Biphasic versus monophasic shock waveform for conversion of atrial fibrillation: the results of an international randomized,double-blind multicenter trial

OBJECTIVES: This study compared a biphasic waveform with a conventional monophasic waveform for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF). BACKGROUND: Biphasic shock waveforms have been demonstrated to be superior to monophasic shocks for termination of ventricular fibrillation, but data regarding biphasic shocks for conversion of AF are still emerging. METHODS: In an international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial, we compared the effectiveness of damped sine wave monophasic versus impedance-compensated truncated exponential biphasic shocks for the cardioversion of AF. Patients received up to five shocks, as necessary for conversion: 100 J, 150 J, 200 J, a fourth shock at maximum output for the initial waveform (200 J biphasic, 360 J monophasic) and a final cross-over shock at maximum output of the alternate waveform. RESULTS: Analysis included 107 monophasic and 96 biphasic patients. The success rate was higher for biphasic than for monophasic shocks at each of the three shared energy levels (100 J: 60% vs. 22%, p < 0.0001; 150 J: 77% vs. 44%, p < 0.0001; 200 J: 90% vs. 53%, p < 0.0001). Through four shocks, at a maximum of 200 J, biphasic performance was similar to monophasic performance at 360 J (91% vs. 85%, p = 0.29). Biphasic patients required fewer shocks (1.7 +/- 1.0 vs. 2.8 +/- 1.2, p < 0.0001) and lower total energy delivered (217 +/- 176 J vs. 548 +/- 331 J, p < 0.0001). The biphasic shock waveform was also associated with a lower frequency of dermal injury (17% vs. 41%, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: For the cardioversion of AF, a biphasic shock waveform has greater efficacy, requires fewer shocks and lower delivered energy, and results in less dermal injury than a monophasic shock waveform.     

Biphasic Versus Monophasic Shock Waveform for Conversion of Atrial Fibrillation

Cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) using traditional monophasic shock waveform is unsuccessful in up to 20% of cases, and often requires several shocks of up to 360 J. Based on the success with biphasic shock waveform in converting ventricular fibrillation, it was postulated that biphasic shocks would allow cardioversion with lower energy. In a international multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial of 203 patients, damped sine wave monophasic shocks were compared with impedance-compensated truncated exponential biphasic waveform shocks. Patients received up to five shocks: 100 J, 150 J, 200 J, a fourth shock at maximum output for the initial waveform (200 J biphasic, 360 J monophasic) and a final cross-over shock at maximum output of the alternate waveform. For each energy level, the biphasic waveform compared favorably to the monophasic waveform in successful cardioversion (100 J: 60% versus 22%, P < 0.0001; 150 J: 77% versus 44%, p < 0.0001; 200 J: 90% versus 53%, p < 0.0001). Success with 200 J biphasic was equivalent to 360 J monophasic shock (91% versus 85%, p = 0.29). Patients randomized to biphasic waveform required fewer shocks and lower total energy delivered; in addition, this waveform was associated with less dermal injury and no blistering. Biphasic shocks converted AF present for less than 48 hours with 80% efficacy, but conversion of AF present for more than 48 hours and more than 1 year the success rate was only 63 and 20%, respectively. The results of this study is similar to other investigations comparing biphasic and monophasic shock waveforms for conversion of atrial fibrillation. We recommend starting with biphasic energy of 100 J for atrial fibrillation of less than 48 hours duration, but using higher energies (150 J, 200 J or greater) when AF has been present for longer periods.     

External cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: comparison of biphasic vs monophasic waveform shocks.

AIMS: It is well established in transthoracic ventricular defibrillation that biphasic truncated waveform shocks are associated with superior defibrillation efficacy when compared with damped sine wave monophasic waveform shocks. The aim of this study was to explore whether biphasic waveform shocks were superior to monophasic waveform shocks for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients in whom cardioversion of AF was indicated were randomized in this prospective study, to transthoracic cardioversion with either monophasic damped sine waveform shocks or biphasic impedance compensating waveform shocks. In the group randomized to monophasic waveform shocks (27 patients), a first shock of 150 J was delivered, followed (if necessary) by a 360 J shock. In the biphasic waveform group (30 patients), the first shock had an energy of 150 J and (if necessary) a second 150 J was delivered. All shocks were delivered in the anterolateral chest pad position. Sinus rhythm was restored in 16 patients (51%) with the first monophasic shock and in 27 patients (86%) with the first biphasic shock. The difference was statistically significant (P=0.02). After the second shock, sinus rhythm was obtained in a total of 24 patients (88%) with monophasic shocks and in 28 patients (93%) with biphasic shocks. No complication was observed in either group and cardiac enzymes (CK, CKmb, troponin I, myoglobin) did not show any significant changes. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that at the same energy level of 150 J, biphasic impedance compensating waveform shocks are superior to monophasic damped sine waveform shocks cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.     

A simple point score system for predicting the efficacy of external rectilinear biphasic cardioversion for persistent atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: To develop a simple point score system that can accurately predict the optimal energy of initial rectilinear biphasic (RLB) waveform shock for cardioversion (DC) of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from 302 consecutive patients with AF who underwent a step-up protocol of sequential shocks of 50 J-from 1 up to 2 J/kg-200 J of RLB waveform DC were prospectively examined. Using a logistic regression model, three variables independently predicted the need for 2 J/kg shocks: AF duration > 7 months, previous DC, and increased left atrial (LA) diameter > 4.5 cm. A simplified point score system (REBICAF score) that spans from 0 to 4 was developed. The score gives two points for AF duration > 7 months and one point for previous DC or LA diameter > 4.5 cm. The area under the receiver operator curve (ROC) of the proposed score for predicting the need for 2 J/kg shock was 0.84. There was a progressive increase in the need for 1 J/kg, 2 J/kg, and 200 J as the point score increased (P < 0.001, chi2 test for trend). More than 90% cumulative success rate was achieved in the low- (0-1), intermediate- (2), and high-REBICAF (3-4) score subgroups with 1 J/kg, 2 J/kg, and 200 J RLB shocks, respectively. CONCLUSION: A simple point score system is useful in prediction of successful initial RLB energy for DC of AF.     

Monophasic versus biphasic waveform shocks for atrial fibrillation cardioversion in patients with concomitant amiodarone therapy.

AIMS: With transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF), biphasic are more effective than monophasic waveforms. We sought to determine the ideal energy levels for biphasic waveforms. Methods We compared biphasic truncated exponential waveforms with monophasic damped sine waveform defibrillators, in a prospective, single-centre, randomized (1:1 ratio) study. The study included 154 patients receiving concomitant amiodarone; 77 received serial biphasic (50, 100, 150, up to 175 J) and 77 monophasic shocks (100, 200, 300, up to 360 J), as necessary. Results First-shock efficacy was similar in the two groups (57 vs. 55%, P = 0.871, respectively), as were serial-shocks (90 vs. 92%, P = 0.780). Both groups received equal numbers of shocks (1.8 +/- 1.1 vs. 1.7 +/- 1.0, P = 0.921). In both groups, serum creatine kinase levels showed a small but significant increase. The increase was, however, higher in the monophasic group. CONCLUSION: In patients with concomitant amiodarone therapy, biphasic truncated exponential shocks, using half the energy, were as effective as monophasic damped sine shocks. The biphasic scheme was not more efficacious for cardioverting AF. In our population, a first shock of at least 100 J seemed advisable with either waveform. If necessary, escalating shocks must be performed, but ideal levels of increase per shock are still uncertain for biphasic waveforms.     

Prospective, randomized comparison of two biphasic waveforms for the efficacy and safety of transthoracic biphasic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine if there is a difference in commercially available biphasic waveforms. BACKGROUND: Although the superiority of biphasic over monophasic waveforms for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) is established, the relative efficacy of available biphasic waveforms is less clear. METHODS: We compared the effectiveness of a biphasic truncated exponential (BTE) waveform and a biphasic rectilinear (BR) waveform for external cardioversion of AF. Patients (N = 188) with AF were randomized to receive transthoracic BR shocks (50, 75, 100, 120, 150, 200 J) or BTE shocks (50, 70, 100, 125, 150, 200, 300, 360 J). Shock strength was escalated until success or maximum energy dose was achieved. If maximum shock strength failed, patients received the maximum shock of the opposite waveform. Analysis included 141 patients (71 BR, 70 BTE; mean age 66.5 +/- 13.7. Forty-seven randomized patients were excluded because of flutter on precardioversion ECG upon blinded review (n = 25), presence of intracardiac thrombus (n = 7), or protocol deviation (n = 15). Groups were similar with regard to clinical and echocardiographic characteristics. RESULTS: The success rate was similar for the two waveforms (93% BR vs 97 BTE, P = .44), although cumulative selected and delivered energy was less in the BTE group. Only AF duration was significantly different between successful and unsuccessful patients. No significant complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Biphasic waveforms were very effective in transthoracic cardioversion of AF, and complication rates were low. No significant difference in efficacy was observed between BR and BTE waveforms. Impedance was not an important determinant of success for either biphasic waveform.     

Biphasic versus monophasic cardioversion in shock-resistant atrial fibrillation:

Biphasic versus Monophasic Cardioversion. INTRODUCTION: Cardioversion of atrial fibrillation using monophasic transthoracic shocks occasionally is ineffective. Biphasic cardioversion requires less energy than monophasic cardioversion, but its efficacy in shock-resistant atrial fibrillation is unknown. Thus, we compared the efficacy of cardioversion using biphasic versus monophasic waveform shocks in patients with atrial fibrillation previously refractory to monophasic cardioversion. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-six patients with prior failed monophasic cardioversion were randomized to either a 360-J monophasic damped sinusoidal shock or biphasic truncated exponential shocks at 150 J, followed by 200 J and then 360 J, if necessary. If either waveform failed, patients were crossed over to the other waveform. The primary endpoint was defined as the proportion of patients achieving sinus rhythm following initial randomized therapy. Stepwise multivariate logistic regression examined independent predictors of shock success, including patient age, sex, left atrial diameter, body mass index, drug therapy, and waveform. Twenty-eight patients were randomized to the biphasic shocks and 28 to the monophasic shocks. Sinus rhythm was restored in 61% of patients with biphasic versus 18% with monophasic shocks (P = 0.001). Seventy-eight percent success was achieved in patients who crossed over to the biphasic shock after failing monophasic cardioversion, whereas only 33% were successfully cardioverted with a monophasic shock after crossover from biphasic shock (P = 0.02). Overall, 69% of patients who received a biphasic shock at any point in the protocol were cardioverted successfully, compared to 21% with the monophasic shock (P < 0.0001). The type of shock was the strongest predictor of shock success (P = 0.0001) in multivariate logistic regression. CONCLUSION: An ascending sequence of 150-, 200-, and 360-J transthoracic biphasic cardioversion shocks are successful more often than a single 360-J monophasic shock. Thus, biphasic shocks should be the recommended configuration of choice for all cardioversions.     

Effect of shock polarity on the efficacy of transthoracic atrial defibrillation

Background The energy requirement for internal ventricular defibrillation is reduced by reversal of shock polarity. The influence of shock polarity on the efficacy of transthoracic atrial defibrillation is unknown. Methods This prospective, randomized study enrolled 110 consecutive patients who were referred for elective cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). The electrodes were placed in the anteroposterior position. The patients were randomized to receive either standard (anterior pad = cathode) or reversed polarity (anterior pad = anode) shocks with a damped sinusoidal monophasic waveform. A step-up protocol was used to estimate the cardioversion threshold. The initial shock energy was 50 J, with subsequent increments to 100, 200, 300, and 360 J in the event of cardioversion failure. Results Sixty-four percent of the patient population were men, with a mean age of 66 ± 13 years and a mean duration of AF of 242 ± 556 days. The overall success rates of cardioversion were 84% for standard polarity and 78% for reversed polarity (P not significant). Among the patients who were successfully cardioverted, the mean atrial defibrillation threshold was 198 ± 103 J for standard polarity and 212 ± 107 J for reversed polarity (P not significant). Conclusions Reversal of shock polarity does not improve transthoracic cardioversion efficacy with a standard damped sinusoidal monophasic waveform. Alternate strategies should be considered for patients who fail external cardioversion, such as adjunctive pharmacologic treatment, use of a biphasic shock waveform, or internal cardioversion. (Am Heart J 2002;143:541-5.)     

Optimization of transthoracic ventricular defibrillation-biphasic and triphasic shocks,waveform rounding,and synchronized shock delivery

The aim of this study is to optimize the truncated exponential waveform for transthoracic ventricular defibrillation. Discharge of a capacitor gives a fast-rising waveform with a spike; rounding of the waveform slows the rate of rise and removes the spike. Defibrillation thresholds for electrically induced VF were determined for rounded and conventional biphasic and triphasic waveforms (apex-anterior paddles; 130 microF capacitor; 3-10 ms phase duration), and for the Lown waveform in 29 anesthetized pigs. Rounding of the leading edge of the biphasic waveform reduced the threshold voltage and current for defibrillation at 3 + 3 ms and 6 + 6 ms phase duration, relative to the conventional unrounded biphasic or the Lown waveforms. The threshold delivered energy was lower for rounded truncated exponential biphasic shocks at 3 + 3 ms (55.3 +/- 2.5 J) than at 6 + 6 ms (67.6 +/- 2.9 J; reduction 15.9 +/- 3.8%; P <.001; n = 29) phase duration. Triphasic shocks (total duration 6-12 ms) showed no advantages over biphasic shocks in this model. The rounded waveform (6 + 6 ms phase duration) had a reduced delivered energy at threshold (9%) with transthoracic shock delivery synchronized to peak (71.1 +/- 4.2 J) or trough (71.5 +/- 4.9 J) of the high amplitude body surface electrocardiogram signal in ventricular fibrillation, compared with unsynchronized shocks (78.7 +/- 4.7 J; P <.05). In this study a biphasic, rounded waveform of total duration 6 or 12 ms, was optimal for the correction of electrically-induced ventricular fibrillation. Synchronization to the peak or trough of the high amplitude electrocardiogram signal gave a further reduction in the energy to defibrillate.     

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of two biphasic defibrillator waveforms for the conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm

The overall efficacy of transthoracic biphasic shocks delivered for conversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) has been demonstrated. We compared 2 different energy waveforms, either the biphasic rectilinear (BRL) waveform or the biphasic truncated exponential (BTE) waveform, in the conversion of AF to sinus rhythm. The relation between energy required for the conversion of AF, the type of biphasic waveform, and patient characteristics were examined. Serum levels of cardiac troponin I were measured before and after cardioversion, as well as postprocedural skin erythema and discomfort. In this prospective trial, 101 patients (mean age 61 +/- 15 years, 72 men [71%]) referred for elective electrical cardioversion of AF were randomized to either a BTE or a BRL device. Shocks were delivered in a step-up fashion beginning with 50 J (then 100 J, 200 J, repeat 200 J, and then crossover to 360 J). One hundred patients were successfully converted to sinus rhythm (99% success rate). There was no difference in efficacy at any energy level used, regardless of the duration of the arrhythmia. In addition, there was no difference in cumulative success. Troponin I did not significantly increase after cardioversion, regardless of the total energy used. A positive correlation between skin erythema and skin discomfort after shock (24 to 48 hours) was seen with increasing cumulative energies. There was also a positive trend toward increasing energy requirements as chest circumference and body mass index increased. Thus, biphasic waveforms are safe and effective at converting AF to sinus rhythm. In this study population, there was no clinical difference between the BRL and the BTE waveforms.     

Encircling overlapping multipulse shock waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation

Objectives. This study was performed to determine the efficacy of new encircling overlapping multipulse, multipathway waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation.

Background. Alternative waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation may improve shock success.

Methods. First, we determined the shock success achieved by three different waveforms at varying energies (18–150 J) in 21 mongrel dogs after short-duration ventricular fibrillation. The waveforms tested included the traditional damped sinusoidal waveform, a single pathway biphasic waveform, and a new encircling overlapping multipulse waveform delivered from six electrode pads oriented circumferentially. Second, in 11 swine we compared the efficacy of encircling overlapping multipulse shocks given from six electrode pads and three capacitors versus encircling overlapping shocks given from a device utilizing three electrodes and one capacitor.

Results. In the first experiment, the encircling overlapping waveform performed significantly better than biphasic and damped sinusoidal waveforms at lower energies. The shock success rate of the overlapping waveform (six pads) ranged from 67 ± 4% (at 18–49 J energy) to 99 ± 3% at ≥150 J; at comparable energies biphasic waveform shock success ranged from 26 ± 5% (p < 0.01 vs. encircling overlapping waveforms) to 99 ± 5% (p = NS). Damped sinusoidal waveform shock success ranged from 4 ± 1% (p < 0.01 vs. encircling overlapping waveform) to 73 ± 9% (p = NS). In the second experiment the three electrode pads, one capacitor encircling waveform achieved shock success rates comparable with the six-pad, three-capacitor waveform; at 18–49 J, success rates were 45 ± 15% versus 57 ± 12%, respectively (p = NS). At 100 J, success rates for both were 100%.

Conclusions. We conclude that encircling overlapping multipulse multipathway waveforms facilitate transthoracic defibrillation at low energies. These waveforms can be generated from a device that requires only three electrodes and one capacitor.     

Transthoracic defibrillation of short-lasting ventricular fibrillation: a randomised trial for comparison of the efficacy of low-energy biphasic rectilinear and monophasic damped sine shocks

BACKGROUND: Biphasic rectilinear shocks are more effective than monophasic shocks for transthoracic atrial defibrillation and for ventricular arrhythmias during electrophysiological testing.We undertook the present study to compare the efficacy of 100 J rectilinear biphasic waveform shocks with 150 J monophasic damped sine waveform shocks for transthoracic defibrillation of true ventricular fibrillation during defibrillation threshold testing (DFT).The second aim of the study was to analyse the influence of patch positions on the efficacy of defibrillation. METHODS: 50 episodes of 14 patients (age ranging from 37 to 82 years) who underwent DFT testing were randomised for back-up shocks with either a sequence of 100 and 200 J biphasic waveform, or a sequence of 150 and 360 J conventional monophasic shocks. A binary search protocol was used at implantation and before hospital discharge. Patients were also randomised to an anteroposterior position versus a right-anterior-apical position. A crossover was performed between implantation and pre-hospital discharge for biphasic versus monophasic sequence as well as for the 2 different positions. RESULTS: After failed internal shocks, 27 episodes were treated with biphasic, and 23 with monophasic shocks.The first attempt by the external device did not terminate II episodes (2 biphasic, 9 monophasic).The first shock efficacy was significantly greater with biphasic than with monophasic shocks (p < 0.02).The overall success rate was 93% with biphasic shocks and 64% with monophasic shocks. In multivariate regression analysis including patch position, arrhythmia duration, type of waveform, testing order and session, only waveform was associated with successful defibrillation (p < 0.02). CONCLUSION: For transthoracic defibrillation of ventricular fibrillation, low-energy rectilinear biphasic shocks are more effective than monophasic shocks.The position of the defibrillation shock pads has no influence on the biphasic shock efficacy, but anteroposterior pad position is more effective using monophasic shocks.     

Transvenous internal cardioversion for atrial fibrillation: a randomized study on defibrillation threshold and tolerability of asymmetrical compared with symmetrical shocks.

The aim of the study was to compare, according to a randomized cross-over design, two different biphasic waveforms (6.5/2.5 ms and 3.0/3.0 ms phases duration, respectively) for low energy internal atrial cardioversion with regard to energy requirements for cardioversion and shock induced discomfort. METHODS: Nineteen patients with chronic persistent atrial fibrillation (AF)(mean duration 16+/-20 months) were submitted to internal atrial cardioversion (shock delivery between catheters in right atrium and coronary sinus, respectively) and were randomly allocated to baseline cardioversion with an asymmetrical biphasic shock (6.5/2.5 ms) or with a symmetrical biphasic shock (3.0/3.0 ms), according to a step up protocol. After baseline cardioversion, a sustained AF was reinduced and the patients crossed to the alternative waveform. The procedure was performed without routine administration of sedatives and shock induced discomfort was monitored by a subjective score (1 to 5). Sedatives or anesthetics were administered at patient's request. RESULTS: The procedure was effective in all the patients and was performed without need for sedatives/anesthetics in 17/19 patients (89%). Leading edge voltage of effective shocks resulted lower for asymmetrical shocks compared to symmetrical shocks (290+/-76 vs. 337+/-104 V, P<0.001) with no statistically significant differences in delivered energy (7.74+/-4.25 vs. 8.65+/-5.94 J). Moreover shock induced discomfort resulted lower for asymmetrical shocks compared to symmetrical (pain score=4.18+/-0.73 vs. 4.59+/-0.62, P<0.02). Shock impedence of effective shocks was 59+/-10 ohms for both waveforms. No significant complications occurred during the procedure and no ventricular arrhythmia was observed after atrial cardioversion. Transient bradycardia requiring support ventricular pacing was observed in one patient. CONCLUSIONS: Delivery of biphasic asymmetrical shocks (6.5/2.5 ms) results in lower leading edge voltage of effective shocks and better patients tolerability compared with conventional biphasic symmetrical shocks (3.0/3.0 ms). These findings are of interest both for transvenous internal cardioversion of chronic persistent AF and for implantable atrial defibrillators.     

Plateau waveform shape allows a much higher patient shock energy tolerance in AF patients

Objectives: To evaluate the possible pain reduction of the plateau waveform in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Background: Previous studies have indicated that reduced amplitude waveforms would be less painful than a conventional (65/65% tilt) biphasic waveform. Computer modeling suggested that a moderately long (10–12 msec) plateau (flat topped) shock waveform would deliver equivalent effectiveness with the lowest possible peak amplitude. Methods: We enrolled 27 patients at two sites with persistent AF with a total of 220 shocks delivered during internal atrial cardioversion using an interleaved crossover design. Patient response was scored in three ways: (1) a verbally reported discomfort score, (2) visual analog scale (VAS), and (3) a blinded observer reporting a contraction score. Results: All scores were significantly reduced (P < 0.0001) by the plateau waveform with impressive statistics: Verbal discomfort (3.51 ± 0.13 to 2.89 ± 0.12), VAS (7.00 ± 0.56 to 5.91 ± 0.36), and contraction scores (1.94 ± 0.12 to 1.62 ± 0.12). The average pain threshold shift (TS) for the Verbal score was 2.34, while that for the VAS score was 2.30. (This means that the patient typically could tolerate 2.34 times as much energy with the plateau waveform for the same level of verbally reported discomfort.) The contraction TS was less at 1.57. Response scores were also corrected for the shock sequence number to control for the sensitization effect from multiple shocks. This increased the TS for the Verbal score to 3.58, but the shock number was not significant for the VAS. A pulmonary artery electrode return was associated with lower pain compared with a coronary sinus position. Conclusion: A plateau shaped biphasic waveform resulted in significantly increased shock energy pain tolerances. Controlling for session sensitization, patients tolerated over three times as much energy for the same verbally reported discomfort score.     

Impact of biphasic electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation on early recurrent atrial fibrillation and shock efficacy

INTRODUCTION: Early recurrent atrial fibrillation (ERAF) after external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) occurs in 12% to 26% of patients. Whether biphasic cardioversion has an impact on the incidence of ERAF after cardioversion of AF is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients (n = 216, mean age 66 years, 71% male, 88% with structural cardiovascular disease or hypertension) underwent cardioversion with a biphasic (Bi) or monophasic (Mo) shock waveform in randomized fashion. Energies used were 120-150-200-200 Ws (Bi) or 200-300-360-360 Ws (Mo). The two study groups (Bi vs Mo) did not differ with regard to age, sex, body mass index, underlying cardiovascular disease, left atrial diameter, left ventricular ejection fraction, duration of AF fibrillation, and antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Mean delivered energy was significantly lower in the Bi group (Bi: 186 +/- 143 Ws vs Mo: 324 +/- 227 Ws; P < 0.001). Overall incidence of ERAF (AF relapse within 1 minute after successful cardioversion) was 8.9% and showed no difference between the two groups (Bi: 8.1% vs Mo: 9.7%, P = NS). Cardioversion was successful in 95.4% of patients. The success rate was comparable in both groups (Bi: 94.3% vs Mo 96.8%; P = NS). First shock efficacy did not differ between Bi and Mo (76.4% vs 67.7%; P = NS). Mean number of shocks were 1.4 shocks per patient in both groups. CONCLUSION: Biphasic cardioversion allows comparable success rates with significantly lower energies. However, the incidence of ERAF is not influenced by biphasic cardioversion. With the energies used, biphasic and monophasic shock waveforms are comparable with regard to first shock and cumulative shock efficacy.     

Ambulatory electrocardioversion of atrial fibrillation by means of biphasic versus monophasic shock delivery. A prospective randomized study

Transthoracic electrical cardioversion using a monophasic waveform is the most common method converting persistent atrial fibrillation into sinus rhythm. Recently, cardioversion with a new biphasic waveform has shown promising results for treatment of atrial fibrillation. We undertook a randomized prospective trial comparing the efficacy and safety of the two waveforms for ambulatory cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. A total of 118 consecutive patients (mean age 62 years [SD 11]) presenting with persistent atrial fibrillation (mean duration 8 months [SD 11]) for ambulatory electrical cardioversion were randomized to receive either monophasic (n = 57) or biphasic shocks (n = 61). We used a standardized step-up protocol with increasing shock energies (100-360 joules) in either group. In all patients an anterior-posterior shock electrode position was used. If sinus rhythm was not achieved with the third (360 joules) shock, cardioversion was repeated with the opposite waveform. The two groups did not differ in demographic or disease-related data. The success rate was 100% for the biphasic and 73.7% for the monophasic waveform (p < 0.001). Biphasic patients required fewer shocks (1.5 versus 2.9) and a lower mean cumulative energy (203 versus 570 joules) (p < 0.001). Twelve out of 15 unsuccessfully treated monophasic patients were converted with biphasic shocks. The success rate for all 118 patients was 97.5%. No major acute complications were observed. For ambulatory transthoracic cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation biphasic shocks are of greater efficacy and require less energy than monophasic shocks. The procedure can be performed ambulatory and is safe regardless of shock waveform used.     

Effect of rapid biphasic shock subpulse switching on ventricular defibrillation thresholds

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to demonstrate that significant reductions in defibrillation threshold (DFT) can be achieved by rapidly switching defibrillation pulses within an overall biphasic envelope between multiple endovascular electrode sets. METHODS AND RESULTS: Defibrillation electrodes were implanted in four locations in nine anesthetized swine (41.7 +/- 8.7 kg). Electrodes were implanted into the right ventricular apex (RV), the superior vena cava (SVC), over the left pectoral region as a "hot can" (Can), and within the middle cardiac vein on the posterior left ventricular (LV) surface. The 50% DFT (level for which 50% of delivered shocks successfully defibrillated) for control shocks (7-ms first phase, 0.5-ms interpulse period, 4-ms second phase, RV- --> SVC+ + Can+) were determined to have energy of 20.5 +/- 5.5 J (mean +/- SD). Mean 50% DFTs were also determined for waveforms that split each phase of the same overall biphasic waveform between various electrode sets. Each phase was divided into 2, 3, 4, or 6 subpulses, the defibrillation shock was sequentially delivered to multiple electrode sets, and DFTs were determined (11.9 +/- 4.8 J, 11.7 +/- 2.9 J, 17.9 +/- 8.7 J, 16.7 +/- 6.1 J, respectively). DFT energy was statistically lower than the control (Wilcoxon sign rank test; P < 0.05) when each phase was divided into 2 or 3 subpulses. CONCLUSION: Rapid shock switching within an overall biphasic waveform between electrode sets including an electrode in the middle cardiac vein potentially can lower DFT energy by 40% or more.     

Defibrillation efficacy and pain perception of two biphasic waveforms for internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation

Efficacy and Pain Perception of Two Biphasic Waveforms. INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the influence of the peak voltage of waveforms used for internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation on defibrillation efficacy and pain perception. A low peak voltage biphasic waveform generated by a 500-microF capacitor with 40% tilt was compared to a standard biphasic waveform generated by a 60-microF capacitor with 80% tilt. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 19 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (79% male, age 55 +/- 11 years, 21% with heart disease), the atrial defibrillation threshold (ADFT) was determined during deep sedation with midazolam for both waveforms in a randomized fashion using a step-up protocol. Internal cardioversion with a single lead (shock vector: coronary sinus to right atrium) was successful in 18 (95%) of 19 patients. ADFT energy and peak voltage were significantly lower for the low-voltage waveform (2.1 +/- 2.4 J vs 3.5 +/- 3.9 J, P < 0.01; 100 +/- 53 V vs 290 +/- 149 V, P < 0.01). Sedation then was reversed with flumazenil after ADFT testing. Two shocks at the ADFT (or a 3-J shock if ADFT >3 J) were administered to the patient using each waveform in random order. Pain perception was assessed using both a visual scale and a numerical score. ADFTs were above the pain threshold in 17 (94%) of 18 patients, even though the ADFT with the 500-microF waveform was <100 V in 63% of the patients. Pain perception was comparable for both waveforms (numerical score: 6.5 +/- 2.4 vs 6.3 +/- 2.6; visual scale: 5.4 +/- 2.6 vs 5.2 +/- 3.1; P = NS, 500-microF vs 60-microF). The second shock was perceived as more painful in 88% of the patients, independent of the waveform used. CONCLUSION: Despite a 66% lower peak voltage and a 40% lower energy, the 40% tilt, 500-microF capacitor biphasic waveform did not change the pain perceived by the patient during delivery of internal cardioversion shocks. Pain perception for internal cardioversion probably is not influenced by peak voltage alone and increases with the number of applied shocks.     

Internal Cardioversion of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Using Rectilinear Biphasic Waveform

Internal electrical cardioversion is currently used in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation resistant to external electrical cardioversion. In external cardioversion, biphasic waveforms have shown a greater efficacy than monomorphic waveforms. The present study aimed to test the safety and efficacy of rectilinear biphasic waveform in converting patients with persistent atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm using internal electrical cardioversion, and to compare it with that of classical monophasic waveform. Twenty-seven consecutive patients with persistent AF received 31 internal cardioversions, using monophasic waveform in 11 (group I), and rectilinear biphasic waveform in 20 cases (group II). Baseline patients characteristics were similar in both groups. Multipolar catheters were positioned in the distal coronary sinus and in the high right atrium. Synchronised shocks were delivered using an escalating protocol of 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, and 50 Joules. In group I, 1 patient was resistant to maximal energy (success rate 91%). The mean energy of the maximal shock was 18 ± 13 J. In group II, all patients were converted to sinus rhythm. The mean energy of the maximal shock was 9 ± 5 J (p < 0.01 vs. group I). No significant complications occurred. At 3 months follow-up, 45% of group I and 60% of group II patients remained in sinus rhythm (p = NS).We conclude that internal cardioversion using rectilinear biphasic waveform is feasible and safe, and requires less energy than classical monophasic waveforms.     

Effect of Electrode Configuration and Capacitor Size on Internal Atrial Defibrillation Threshold Using Leads Currently Used for Ventricular Defibrillation.

Background: Previous studies have shown that endocardial atrial defibrillation, using lead configurations specifically designed for ventricular defibrillation, is feasible but the substantial patient discomfort might prevent the widespread use of the technique unless significant improvements in shock tolerability are achieved. It has been suggested that the peak voltage or the peak current but not the total energy delivered determines the patient pain perception and therefore, lower defibrillating voltage and current achieved with modifications in lead and waveforms may increase shock tolerability. This study was undertaken to evaluate the effect, on the atrial defibrillation threshold (ADFT), of the addition of a patch electrode (mimicking the can electrode) to the right ventricle (RV)-superior vena cava (SVC) lead configuration. The influence of capacitor size on ADFT using the RV-SVC+skin patch configuration was also assessed.Methods: In 10 patients (pts) (Group 1) cardioversion thresholds were evaluated using biphasic shocks in two different configurations: 1) right ventricle (RV) to superior vena cava (SVC); 2) RV to SVC+skin patch. In a second group of twelve patients (Group 2) atrial defibrillation thresholds of biphasic waveforms that differed with the total capacitance (90 or 170 µF) were assessed using the RV to SVC+skin patch configuration.Results: In Group 1 AF was terminated in 10/10 pts (100 %) with both configurations. There was no significant difference in delivered energy at the defibrillation threshold between the two configurations (7.1 ± 5.1 J vs 7.1 ± 2.6 J; p < 0.05). In group 2 AF was terminated in 12/12 pts (100%) with both waveforms. The 170 µF waveform provided a significantly lower defibrillating voltage (323.7 ± 74.6 V vs 380 ± 70.2 V; p < 0.03) and current (8.1 ± 2.7 A vs 10.0 ± 2.3 A; p < 0.04) than the 90 µF waveform. All pts, in both groups, perceived the shock of the lowest energy tested (180 V) as painful or uncomfortable.Conclusions: The addition of a patch electrode to the RV-SVC lead configuration does not reduce the ADFT. Shocks from larger capacitors defibrillate with lower voltage and current but pts still perceive low energy subthreshold shocks as painful or uncomfortable.