The somatostatin analog SMS 201-995 induces long-acting inhibition of growth hormone secretion without rebound hypersecretion in acromegalic patients

The acute effect of the somatostatin analog SMS 201-995 (SMS) was investigated in eight acromegalic patients. This substance is an octapeptide [DPhe-Cys-Phe-D-Trp-Lys-Thr-Cys-Thr-(ol)] that inhibits GH release in experimental animals and man. After a control day, 50 micrograms SMS were injected sc, and plasma GH and insulin and blood glucose levels were measured at multiple intervals for 24 h. GH significantly (P less than 0.001) decreased in seven of eight acromegalic patients from 30 +/- 5 (+/- SE) to an average of 10.7 +/- 4 micrograms/l from 1-10 h after drug administration. No rebound effect occurred. Postprandial blood glucose levels were significantly (P less than 0.01) higher between 2 and 4 h after SMS treatment compared with control day values, and there was a substantial reduction in insulin secretion, as estimated by the area under the curve (P less than 0.01), during the first 3 h after SMS administration. Circulating GH was not altered by SMS or the dopamine agonist mesulergine in one patient, but the combination of both substances (50 micrograms SMS, sc, and 0.5 mg mesulergine, orally) reduced GH to below 50% of basal. In vitro studies showed that 1 PM, 0.1 nM, and 10 nM SMS or natural somatostatin exerted a similar inhibitory effect (12-39% reduction; P less than 0.01 for all three strengths) on GH release by cultured human pituitary tumor cells. In conclusion, the somatostatin derivative SMS exerts a potent and prolonged inhibitory action on GH secretion and a shorter lasting suppression of insulin in acromegalic patients. Therefore, it may represent a useful tool in the chronic management of this condition.     

The dawn phenomenon is related to overnight growth hormone release in adolescent diabetics

We have investigated the relation between nocturnal insulin requirements and nocturnal growth hormone (GH) release in 26 diabetic adolescents at various puberty stages and have examined the effect of nocturnal GH suppression on pre-breakfast insulin requirement. In all the studies, euglycaemia was maintained overnight using a computer-calculated variable-rate insulin infusion, and 15-min blood samples were collected for GH assay. During initial clamp studies, insulin infusion rates were greater from 0500-0800 h (15.22 +/- 0.95 mU/kg/h, mean +/- SEM) than from 0100-0400 h (12.42 +/- 0.84 mU/kg/h, P less than 0.001). The increase in insulin infusion rate correlated with mean overnight GH concentration (r = 0.68, P less than 0.001), and was maximal at puberty stage 3 in both sexes. In seven of the subjects, a second identical clamp was performed following administration of 100 mg oral pirenzepine. During these studies, mean overnight GH levels were reduced by 11-85%, from 17.6 +/- 1.6 to 7.5 +/- 2.2 mU/l; P less than 0.01. Insulin requirements were not significantly different between the periods 0100-0400 and 0500-0800 h during these studies, and the reduction in pre-breakfast (0500-0800 h) insulin requirement when compared with the baseline studies correlated with the fall in GH secretion (rs = 0.82, P less than 0.01). The dawn increase in insulin requirement in adolescents with IDDM is related to the overnight GH secretion during puberty, and pre-breakfast insulin requirement can be reduced by suppressing nocturnal GH release.     

The effect of pirenzepine on growth hormone and blood glucose levels in type I diabetes mellitus. A controlled study in patients on basal bolus insulin treatment

Increased GH levels in Type I diabetes mellitus have been implicated in the pathogenesis of metabolic complications such as the so-called dawn phenomenon. GH secretion is under control of cholinergic mechanisms. In 21 Type I diabetic patients the effect of oral administration of the anticholinergic drug pirenzepine in addition to intensive insulin therapy on GH and blood glucose levels was studied. At 21.30, 08.00 and 12.00 h, all patients received in random order 50 mg of pirenzepine or placebo po. Blood for determination of GH, blood glucose, cortisol and C-peptide levels were obtained at 3-h intervals. Serum levels of plasma glucose and GH were significantly lower under pirenzepine than under placebo (P less than 0.05 and P less than 0.01, respectively). Serum levels of cortisol, free insulin and C-peptide were comparable on the test and the control day. Our data indicate that in Type I diabetes mellitus the anticholinergic drug pirenzepine is effective in decreasing both GH and blood glucose levels.     

Early morning hyperglycemia in insulin-dependent diabetes: acute and sustained effects of cholinergic blockade

Nocturnal release of GH has been shown to be related to the early morning rise in plasma glucose (PG) seen in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). We have studied the effects of suppression of nocturnal GH release during a single night (acute study) and after nightly suppression for 1 week (chronic study). Changes in plasma glucose and counter-regulatory hormone concentrations were monitored in six IDDM patients during a constant overnight insulin infusion alone, after addition of the anticholinergic agent pirenzepine to cause acute GH suppression, and again on the seventh night of such treatment. In control experiments (infusion of insulin alone; 0.075 mU/kg.min) PG increased from (mean +/- SEM) 5.6 +/- 0.6 mmol/L at 2400 h to 11.1 +/- 1.3 mmol/L at 0900 h (P = 0.0024). Addition of pirenzepine (100 mg at 2200 h and again at 2400 h) in the acute study resulted in a PG change from 5.6 +/- 0.3 mmol/L at 2400 h to 8.4 +/- 1.4 mmol/L at 0900 h (P = 0.17). After pirenzepine administration at the same dose for 7 nights, PG increased from 4.7 +/- 0.6 mmol/L at 2400 h to 6.8 +/- 1.2 mmol/L at 0900 h (P = 0.11). Increases in PG during the study period were significantly less after chronic treatment than after acute treatment compared with changes on control nights. The nocturnal release of GH, which was demonstrated in all patients during the control nights, was suppressed in all patients during the acute study and in four of six patients during the chronic studies. We conclude that initial reduction of the early morning rise of PG in IDDM is associated with acute suppression of nocturnal GH release, and that the more significant sustained effect of anticholinergic GH suppression on the rise of PG may be associated with additional indirect effects on insulin clearance.     

Interactions of galanin and arginine on growth hormone, prolactin, and insulin secretion in man.

Galanin (GAL), a 29 amino acid neuropeptide, is known to increase both basal and growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH)-induced growth hormone (GH) secretion while not significantly increasing prolactin (PRL) secretion in man. GAL is also endowed with an inhibiting effect on glucose-stimulated insulin release in animals, but not in man. We studied the effect of GAL (80 pmol/kg/min infused over 60 minutes) on the arginine- (ARG, 30 g infused over 30 minutes) stimulated GH, PRL, insulin, and C-peptide secretion in eight healthy volunteers (age, 20 to 30 years). GAL induced an increase of GH (GAL v saline, area under curve [AUC], mean +/- SEM: 316.5 +/- 73.9 v 93.2 +/- 20.9 micrograms/L/h, P less than .05), but failed to modify both PRL and insulin secretion. GAL enhanced the ARG-induced stimulation of both GH (1,634.1 +/- 293.1 v 566.9 +/- 144.0 micrograms/L/h, P less than .02) and PRL secretion (1,541.9 +/- 248.8 v 1,023.8 +/- 158.7 micrograms/L/h, P less than .02). On the contrary, GAL blunted the ARG-stimulated insulin (816.3 +/- 87.7 v 1,322.7 +/- 240.9 mU/L/h, P less than .05), as well as C-peptide secretion (105.1 +/- 9.8 v 132.8 +/- 17.3 micrograms/L/h, P less than .02). ARG administration induced a transient increase of glucose levels (P less than .01 v baseline) followed by a significant decrease (P less than .05 v baseline). This latter effect was prevented by the coadministration of GAL. In conclusion, these results show that in man GAL potentiates the GH response to ARG, suggesting that these drugs act at the hypothalamic level, at least in part, via different mechanisms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Cholinergic blockade with pirenzepine induces dose-related reduction in glucose and insulin responses to a mixed meal in normal subjects and non-insulin dependent diabetics

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess the effects of cholinergic blockade with pirenzepine on glucose and insulin responses to a mixed meal in normal subjects and patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes (NIDDM). Further, to assess in normal subjects the relative importance of nocturnal GH suppression by pirenzepine. DESIGN: Placebo, 100 or 200 mg pirenzepine were given to the normal subjects 1 hour before a standard mixed meal. The effects of placebo or 200 mg pirenzepine at night on nocturnal GH secretion and subsequent breakfast carbohydrate tolerance were also studied. NIDDMs were given placebo or 200 mg pirenzepine before the meal. SUBJECTS: We studied six healthy male volunteers (ages 20-22, body mass indices 20.3-23.3) and ten NIDDMs (eight men, ages 42-74); five obese (BMI 25.5-31.8) and five non-obese (BMI 21.2-24.8). MEASUREMENTS: Serial plasma glucose and insulin concentrations were measured for 3 hours after a standard mixed meal. RESULTS: Acute pretreatment of normal male volunteers with pirenzepine produced a dose-related improvement in carbohydrate tolerance. Peak post-prandial plasma glucose levels were delayed and significantly reduced following 200 mg orally (6.5 +/- 0.1 mmol/l), but not following 100 mg (7.3 +/- 0.3), compared with placebo (7.6 +/- 0.3). Peak insulin levels were similarly delayed and reduced by the 200 mg dose only (36.5 +/- 6.1 mU/l, compared with 49.8 +/- 8.7). Suppression of nocturnal GH by 200 mg pirenzepine at night produced a small reduction in fasting plasma glucose (5.0 +/- 0.1 mmol/l, compared with 5.3 +/- 0.1, P less than 0.02) but did not improve subsequent breakfast carbohydrate tolerance. Peak plasma glucose in NIDDMs was reduced following pirenzepine (12.4 +/- 0.9 mmol/l) compared with placebo (14.3 +/- 1.0, P less than 0.01). This reduction was equally significant in obese and non-obese groups. Peak plasma insulin was also reduced by pirenzepine (22.4 +/- 3.9 mU/l) compared with placebo (42.4 +/- 5.3, P less than 0.01). Insulin suppression was quantitatively greater in obese than in non-obese patients. CONCLUSIONS: Improvement in carbohydrate tolerance after pirenzepine in normal subjects is dose related and largely independent of GH suppression. Cholinergic blockade can also improve meal carbohydrate tolerance with simultaneous reduction in plasma insulin concentrations in non-insulin dependent diabetics, particularly those with obesity.     

Time course and mechanism of growth hormone's negative feedback effect on its own spontaneous release.

Endogenous pulsatile GH secretion is blunted by the administration of exogenous GH; however, few data are available on the time course of GH negative feedback, and the mechanism by which this occurs still remains unclear. In the present study, we examined the temporal pattern of the inhibitory effect induced by an acute (single) and chronic (5 days) sc recombinant human (rh) GH injection regimen on spontaneous GH release in the rat and assessed the possible involvement of the hypothalamic GH-inhibitory peptide, somatostatin (SRIF), in this response. Eight-hour (0800-1600 h) GH secretory profiles, obtained from free-moving adult male rats administered a single sc injection of 200 micrograms rhGH at 0800 h, revealed a marked suppression of spontaneous GH pulses (GH peak amplitude: 45.7 +/- 10.9 vs. 207.8 +/- 31.7 ng/ml in H2O-injected control rats; P less than 0.001) lasting for up to 4.1 +/- 0.1 h after the injection (mean 4-h plasma GH level: 13.6 +/- 3.6 vs. 49.4 +/- 7.0 ng/ml in H2O-injected controls; P less than 0.01). During the subsequent 4- to 8-h period, recovery of spontaneous GH secretory bursts was evident, and neither the GH peak amplitude nor mean 4-h plasma GH level of rhGH-treated rats was significantly different from that of H2O-injected controls. The magnitude, time course, and recovery of the rhGH-induced inhibitory effect on pulsatile GH release after chronic rhGH treatment was similar to that after a single injection. Passive immunization of rhGH-treated rats with SRIF antiserum reversed the rhGH-induced inhibition of spontaneous GH pulses (peak amplitude: 131.7 +/- 53.7 vs. 7.1 +/- 3.4 ng/ml in rhGH-treated control rats given normal sheep serum; P less than 0.05) and restored both the GH peak amplitude and mean plasma GH level to values similar to those in H2O-injected controls. Taken together, these results demonstrate that: 1) the inhibitory effect of rhGH on endogenous pulsatile GH release is of short duration (approximately 4 h); 2) the time course of this response does not change after 5-day repeated rhGH administration; and 3) the feedback effect of GH on its own spontaneous release is exerted, at least in part, by increasing hypothalamic SRIF secretion. Such a mechanism of GH feedback may be important in the physiological control of pulsatile GH secretion.     

Role of growth hormone in the pathogenesis of dawn phenomenon in IDDM]

The early morning hyperglycemia of diabetic patients has been commonly referred to as the "dawn phenomenon". Recently the nocturnal surges of growth hormone (GH) have been suggested as an important factor in the pathogenesis of the dawn phenomenon. In order to reassess the role of the nocturnal GH secretion in the dawn phenomenon, seven C-peptide negative diabetic patients were studied during 48hr-feedback control using a closed-loop insulin infusion device (Biostator). They received oral sleeping medication only on the first night (control) and sleeping medication with anticholinergic agent (pirenzepine 75mg) on the second night, and blood glucose, insulin requirements, GH and cortisol concentrations during 0000hr and 0700hr were measured. The peak of sleep-induced GH secretions was markedly suppressed by pirenzepine in comparison with the control night (19.8 +/- 3.7 vs. 3.0 +/- 1.2ng/ml; p less than 0.05). Insulin requirements during 0500hr and 0700hr were suppressed significantly by pirenzepine (3.0 +/- 0.2 vs. 2.0 +/- 0.2U/2hr; p less than 0.05). Insulin infusion ratio, i.e. insulin requirements during 0500hr and 0700hr divided by those during 0000hr and 0200hr, was decreased by pirenzepine (2.2 +/- 0.3 vs. 1.5 +/- 0.2; p less than 0.05). There were no significant differences in blood glucose and cortisol concentrations whether or not the anticholinergic agent was given. In conclusion, these results have shown that an anticholinergic agent may be useful in the management of insulin-treated patients with marked dawn phenomenon.     

Cholinergic involvement in the growth hormone releasing hormone-induced growth hormone release: studies in normal and acromegalic subjects

To throw light onto the mechanism(s) by which the cholinergic system influences growth hormone (GH) release, the effects of two muscarinic receptor blockers, pirenzepine and atropine, and of an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, pyridostigmine bromide, on the GH response to GHRH-44 were studied in 19 normal volunteers. Moreover, the effects of pirenzepine administration on plasma GH levels both in basal conditions and after stimulation by GHRH-44 and TRH were studied in 9 acromegalics. Both pirenzepine (0.6 mg/kg i.v., 5 min before GHRH) and atropine (1 mg i.m., 15 min before GHRH) blunted the GH response to GHRH (1 microgram/kg i.v. bolus) (area under the response curve, AUC: 81.3 +/- 17.3 vs. 481.2 +/- 211.3 ng/ml/h for pirenzepine and 100.2 +/- 27.0 vs. 364.7 +/- 81.0 ng/ml/h for atropine; p less than 0.01). Pyridostigmine (120 mg orally, 30 min before GHRH) induced a variable but significant (p less than 0.02) rise in basal plasma GH levels and, furthermore, an unequivocal potentiation of the GH response to GHRH (AUC: 1044.6 +/- 245.3 vs. 481.2 +/- 211.3 ng/ml/h; p less than 0.01). In all but one acromegalics 0.6 mg/kg i.v. pirenzepine was unable to modify the basal GH levels whilst it showed a variable inhibitory effect on the GH response to GHRH. The GH response to TRH (200 micrograms i.v. bolus) was instead unmodified by pirenzepine. In conclusion, muscarinic receptor blockade inhibits while cholinergic potentiation seems to positively modulate the GH response to GHRH. Therefore, the cholinergic system seems to positively modulate the GHRH effect on somatotrophs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Cholinergic modulation of growth hormone responses to growth hormone-releasing hormone in uraemic patients on peritoneal dialysis

BACKGROUND: Hypothalamic cholinergic neurotransmission plays a major role in the regulation of GH secretion. Pyridostigmine, a cholinesterase inhibitor, is able to decrease hypothalamic somatostatinergic tone and release GH in normal subjects. Blockade of muscarinic receptor with pirenzepine blunts the GH release in several clinical situations. However, little information is available on the role played by central cholinergic pathways in GH regulation in uraemic patients. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess GH responses to GHRH after pretreatment with pyridostigmine and pirenzepine in a group of uraemic patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD). GH responses of the patients treated with recombinant human erythropeitin (rhEPO) were compared to patients without treatment. DESIGN: We studied 14 male patients on PD and nine control subjects. All subjects underwent three endocrine test in random order after an overnight fast. Each subject received GHRH (100 microg, i.v. in bolus at 0 minutes). Sixty minutes before the injection of GHRH subjects were given oral placebo, pyridostigmine (120 mg), or pirenzepine (100 mg). MEASUREMENTS: Blood samples for GH were collected at -60, 0, 15, 30, 45, 60 and 90 minutes The hormonal secretory responses were studied by a time-averaged (area under the curves, AUC) and time-independent (peak values) analysis. RESULTS: Baseline GH concentrations were similar in patients and controls. GH responses to placebo plus GHRH were also comparable in patients and controls (peak 26.6 +/- 3.8 vs. 33.2 +/- 4.4 mU/l, AUC 28.2 +/- 3.4 vs. 27.8 +/- 4.6 mU/h/l). Pyridostigmine administration induced a significant potentiation of GH responses to GHRH both in patients (peak 43.2 +/- 5.2 mU/l, AUC 47.6 +/- 6.0 mU/h/l; P < 0.01) and in control subjects (peak 79.2 +/- 8.6 mU/l, AUC 78.0 +/- 9.4 mU/h/l; P < 0.01). However, the increment in GH peak and AUC was significantly (P < 0.05) greater in controls in relation to values found in patients. Pirenzepine administration induced an abolishment of GH release after GHRH stimulation both in PD patients (peak 5.4 +/- 2.6 mU/l, AUC 6.0 +/- 2.4 mU/h/l; P < 0.01) and in healthy controls (peak 3.8 +/- 0.6 mU/l, AUC 4.0 +/- 0.4 mU/h/l; P < 0.05). Responses to pyridostigmine plus GHRH and pirenzepine plus GHRH were similar in patients on chronic therapy with recombinant human erythropeitin and in patients without rhEPO therapy. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the cholinergic regulation of GH release is preserved in uraemic patients on peritoneal dialysis. The significantly lower increase in GH response to GHRH induced by pyridostigmine suggests that cholinergic stimulatory tone is attenuated in patients in relation to control subjects. Long-term therapy with rhEPO seems not to affect GH responses to cholinergic stimulation or blockade.     

Plasma concentrations of growth hormone during hyperglycemic clamp with or without somatostatin infusion in obese subjects

It is known that obese subjects have a blunted GH secretory response to stimulation, but little is known about the inhibition of GH secretion in obesity. The present study was designed to evaluate the effects of obesity on the suppression of GH by hyperglycemia and/or somatostatin. Plasma GH concentrations were measured in eight nondiabetic obese subjects and eight nonobese healthy controls during a 4-h hyperglycemic clamp. During the third hour synthetic cyclic somatostatin-14 was infused at the rate of 2.5 nmol/min. Baseline plasma GH levels were similar in obese and nonobese subjects (0.9 +/- 0.1 vs. 0.8 +/- 0.2 micrograms/L; mean +/- SEM). In the last 20 min of the glucose infusion period preceding somatostatin administration (100-120 min of the study) plasma GH averaged 0.8 +/- 0.1 micrograms/L in obese patients and 0.4 +/- 0.1 micrograms/L in control subjects (P less than 0.01), with a reduction of 6 +/- 5% in the former and 35 +/- 10% in the latter (P less than 0.01). In both groups somatostatin infusion did not result in a further decrease in plasma GH. Discontinuation of the somatostatin infusion resulted in a rise in both groups; the increase was higher in nonobese subjects (8.1 +/- 3.8 vs. 2.3 +/- 0.9 micrograms/L in the period 220-240 min; P = NS). These results suggest that in human obesity, hyperglycemia has a diminished inhibitory effect on GH secretion, and somatostatin administration has no additional effect in either obese or nonobese nondiabetic subjects.     

Effect of withdrawal of somatostatin plus growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone as a stimulus of GH secretion in Cushing's syndrome

OBJECTIVE: Somatostatin (SS) may not merely be inhibitory to GH secretion but, under appropriate temporal conditions, may act in a paradoxically positive manner to sensitize somatotroph responsiveness to GHRH. SS infusion withdrawal (SSIW) produces a rebound GH rise in humans and increases GHRH-induced GH release. Theoretically SSIW leaves the somatotroph cell in a situation of low endogenous SS. In Cushing's syndrome, GH secretion appears blunted to all stimuli. The mechanisms by which glucocorticoids impair GH secretion in Cushing's syndrome are unknown. There are no data evaluating GH responsiveness to SSIW plus GHRH in Cushing's syndrome patients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the GH response to SSIW plus GHRH in a group of Cushing's syndrome patients, in order to further understand the deranged GH secretory mechanisms in Cushing's syndrome. PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS: Eight female patients with Cushing's syndrome were studied. As a control group, eight normal subjects of similar age and sex were studied. Three tests were done. On one day, SS intravenous (i.v.) infusion (500 micro g for 0-90 min) was performed followed by placebo i.v. bolus at min 90 after SS withdrawal (SSIW). On another day, SS i.v. infusion (500 micro g for 0-90 min) was performed followed by GHRH (100 micro g) i.v. bolus at min 90 after SS withdrawal. On a third day, slow infusion of 150 mmol/l NaCl administration was performed followed by GHRH (100 micro g) i.v. bolus at min 90 after the start of the infusion. Blood samples were taken at appropriate intervals for determination of GH. RESULTS: GHRH-induced GH secretion in normal subjects showed a mean peak of 15.4 +/- 2.1 micro g/l (conversion factor: 1 micro g/l = 1.2 mUI/l). Normal control subjects had a mean peak of 3.3 +/- 1.6 micro g/l after SSIW-induced GH secretion. When GHRH was administered after SSIW there was increased GH secretion with a mean peak of 23.7 +/- 4.2 micro g/l significantly greater than the response after SSIW alone (P < 0.05) and GHRH alone (P < 0.05). The patients with Cushing's syndrome had a blunted GH response after GHRH administration with a mean peak of 1.4 +/- 0.4. After SSIW, Cushing's syndrome patients had a mean peak of 1.0 +/- 0.5 micro g/l. When GHRH was administered after SSIW there was a similar GH response with a mean peak of 1.7 +/- 0.6 micro g/l, not statistically different than the response after SSIW alone (P = ns) and GHRH alone (P = ns). When we compare the response of normal subjects and Cushing's syndrome patients, after SSIW plus GHRH, it was decreased in Cushing's syndrome patients (P < 0.05), with a mean GH peak of 23.7 +/- 4.2 micro g/l and 1.7 +/- 0.6 micro g/l for normal subjects and Cushing's syndrome patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated a significantly blunted peak GH response to somatostatin infusion withdrawal plus GHRH in Cushing's syndrome patients. In this theoretical situation of decreased somatostatinergic tone there is persistence of GH hyposecretion in Cushing's syndrome, suggesting the existence of a pituitary defect responsible for the decreased GH secretion in Cushing's syndrome.     

Corticotropin-releasing hormone inhibition of growth hormone-releasing hormone-induced growth hormone release in man

Recent studies in the rat have shown that intracerebroventricular administration of CRH inhibited spontaneous pulsatile GH secretion and prevented GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)-induced GH release. We have studied the effect of CRH on GHRH-induced GH release in man. In the first study, CRH was injected iv at three different doses (100, 50, or 25 micrograms) at 0800 h together with 50 micrograms GHRH in six men and six women. In a second study, 100 micrograms CRH were given iv at 0800 h, 1 h before the administration of 50 micrograms GHRH in five men and five women. Each subject demonstrated a normal GH response after the administration of 50 micrograms GHRH plus saline. All doses of CRH administered simultaneously with GHRH significantly inhibited GHRH-induced GH release in women [peak value +/- SE after GHRH plus saline, 28.9 +/- 2.9 micrograms/L; after GHRH plus 100 micrograms CRH, 9.9 +/- 0.7 micrograms/L (P less than 0.001); after GHRH plus 50 micrograms CRH, 8.7 +/- 0.8 micrograms/L (P less than 0.001); after GHRH plus 25 microgram CRH, 9.5 +/- 1.6 microgram/L (P less than 0.001]). In contrast, in men, while a dose of 100 micrograms CRH was capable of suppressing GHRH-induced GH secretion (peak value +/- SE, 8.1 +/- 0.6 vs. 20 +/- 2.9 micrograms/L; P less than 0.001), no inhibition was observed after 50- and 25-micrograms doses. When 100 micrograms CRH were injected 1 h before the administration of 50 micrograms GHRH, it strongly inhibited GHRH-induced GH secretion in both men (peak value +/- SE, 6.2 +/- 2.8 vs. 24.6 +/- 5.9 micrograms/L; P less than 0.02) and women (peak value +/- SE, 14.2 +/- 4.5 vs. 37.8 +/- 6.7 micrograms/L; P less than 0.005), and this inhibition lasted up to 2 h post-CRH administration. These results demonstrate that CRH is capable of inhibiting GHRH-induced GH release in both men and women. Furthermore, the findings suggest that a sexual dimorphism in the neuroregulation of GH secretion may be present in man. In view of the inhibitory action of CRH on GH secretion, simultaneous administration of CRH and GHRH for testing should be avoided in clinical practice.     

Growth hormone (GH) provocative testing frequently does not reflect endogenous GH secretion

GH secretion was studied in 73 children with classical GH deficiency or GH neurosecretory dysfunction (GHND), intrinsic short stature, or normal stature. The GH-deficient group was defined by a peak GH secretory response below 10 ng/ml to all provocative tests (arginine, L-dopa, insulin hypoglycemia, and clonidine). GHND was defined by a mean serum 24-h GH concentration below 3 ng/ml, with a normal response (greater than or equal to 10 ng/ml) to provocative testing. Twenty-one GH-deficient children, 21 children with GHND, and 18 short control children underwent provocative GH testing and a 24-h study with GH sampling every 20 min. A group of 13 normal stature control children also underwent 24-h GH sampling. The mean stimulated peak serum GH level [4.7 +/- 0.6 (+/- SEM) ng/ml] in the GH-deficient group was significantly below that in the GHND (19.5 +/- 1.7 ng/ml) and short control groups (24.0 +/- 3.5 ng/ml; P less than 0.01). The mean 24-h serum GH concentration was reduced in GH-deficient (1.5 +/- 0.2 ng/ml) and GHND (2.0 +/- 0.1 ng/ml) children compared to those in short (5.6 +/- 0.5 ng/ml) and normal stature (5.8 +/- 0.8 ng/ml) control children (P less than 0.01). Peak GH concentrations after provocative testing correlated poorly with 24-h mean concentrations in GH-deficient, GHND, and short control children (r = 0.38, 0.23, and 0.41, respectively; P = NS for all groups). Mean serum GH concentrations from blood sampling intervals of 12 h (day/night; 0800-2000/2000-0800 h, respectively) or even 6 h (day; 0900-1500 h) were statistically different in GHND or GH-deficient groups compared to those in control children; however, there was significantly more overlap for individual children using the 6- and 12-h daytime intervals than for the 24-h data. Plasma somatomedin-C/insulin-like growth factor I correlated with mean 24-h GH concentration endogenous secretion (r = 0.7; P less than 0.001). These data suggest that provocative GH testing frequently does not correlate with endogenous GH secretion.     

Histamine-induced paradoxical growth hormone response to thyrotropin-releasing hormone in normal men

GH responses to TRH occur in patients with certain diseases, such as acromegaly, severe liver disease, uremia, and mental disorders, and presumably reflect disruption of normal hypothalamic control of GH secretion. Since histamine (HA) inhibits hypothalamic stimulation of GH secretion, we investigated the combined effect of HA receptor activation and TRH administration on GH secretion in normal men. Eight men were given 4-h infusions of the following: saline, HA, HA plus mepyramine (Me; and H1-antagonist), HA plus cimetidine (C; an H2-antagonist), and C alone. TRH (200 micrograms) was injected iv 2 h after the start of each infusion. HA alone or in combination with either antagonist had no effect on basal or TRH-stimulated TSH secretion and no effect on basal GH secretion. However, when TRH was injected during H1 stimulation by HA plus C, GH secretion increased significantly [from 0.7 +/- 0.1 to 7.1 +/- 1.8 (+/- SEM) ng/ml; P less than 0.01] in seven of eight subjects. This GH response was reproducible and did not occur when saline was administered instead of TRH. A smaller and delayed GH response to TRH occurred during infusions of HA alone (from 0.8 +/- 0.1 to 4.9 +/- 1.0 ng/ml; P less than 0.05). No effect of TRH on GH secretion occurred during the infusion of saline (1.2 +/- 0.3 ng/ml), HA plus Me (0.9 +/- 0.1 ng/ml), or C (2.2 +/- 1.0 ng/ml). There was a significant increase in GH secretion after cessation of the infusions of HA (from 3.4 +/- 1.1 to 7.5 +/- 2.2 ng/ml) and HA plus Me (from 0.8 +/- 0.1 to 5.1 +/- 1.8 ng/ml). This rebound in GH secretion might indicate an inhibitory effect of TRH during H2-receptor stimulation. This concept is supported by the significantly smaller GH response to TRH during HA infusion than during HA plus C infusion (P less than 0.01). The study indicates that H1-receptor stimulation induces a stimulatory effect of TRH on GH secretion in normal men and that H2-receptor stimulation possibly induces an inhibitory effect of TRH on GH secretion.     

Blunted growth hormone (GH) responsiveness to GH-releasing hormone in obese patients: influence of prolonged administration of the serotoninergic drug fenfluramine

The aim of the present study was to ascertain if reduced central serotoninergic activity might contribute to the well-known blunted growth hormone (GH) response to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) in obese patients. Thus, we studied the effect of prolonged stimulation of the serotoninergic system by fenfluramine (FF; 60 mg twice daily for 7 days) on GHRH-induced GH release in nine obese and seven normal subjects. In controls, GHRH (100 micrograms intravenously [IV]) injection increased GH levels from 2.3 +/- 1.8 (+/- SE) to 18.5 +/- 2.8 mU/L, P less than .002. FF administration enhanced both basal and GHRH-stimulated GH levels (peak, 38.4 +/- 8.3 v 6.9 +/- 2.6 mU/L, P less than .002). This response was significantly higher (P less than .02) than in pretreatment. In obese patients, GH responsiveness to GHRH was slight (peak, 7.1 +/- 2.0 v 0.6 +/- 0.18 mU/L, P less than .01) and lower (P less than .01) than in controls. FF administration did not affect this response. In controls, the enhanced FF-induced GH release after a maximal dose of GHRH indicates that serotoninergic activation influences GH secretion and that the mechanism involved is independent of endogenous GHRH. In obese patients, we found a blunted GH responsiveness to GHRH that was not affected by FF, thus supporting the hypothesis that the serotoninergic control on GH release is impaired.     

Effect of cholinergic muscarinic receptor blockade on human growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone-(1-44)-induced GH secretion in anorexia nervosa

The presence of hypothalamic disturbances affecting GH secretion in anorexia nervosa has been suggested, although a normal GH response to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) administration has been shown in these patients. The present study was performed to investigate the role of acetylcholine in regulating GH secretion by using pirenzepine, which selectively blocks muscarinic cholinergic receptors. Paired tests were performed in nine anorexia nervosa patients (age +/- SEM, 19.1 +/- 1.2 yr; percent ideal body weight, -32.7 +/- 2.2%) and in six normal controls (20.1 +/- 0.3 yr; -3.1 +/- 1.8%). GHRH-(1-44) (1 microgram/kg) was infused iv with and without pirenzepine pretreatment (0.6 mg/kg, iv). Basal levels of GH were not different in anorexia nervosa compared to normal controls, whereas, somatomedin-C levels were significantly lower in anorexia nervosa patients. However, after pirenzepine administration, the GHRH-stimulated GH responses were completely blocked in normal controls, but not in anorexia nervosa patients. These results suggested that altered muscarinic cholinergic mechanism are involved in the modulation of GH secretion in patients with anorexia nervosa.     

Cholinergic muscarinic receptor blockade suppresses arginine- and exercise-induced growth hormone secretion in type I diabetic subjects

Stimulatory cholinergic pathways participate in the regulation of GH release, and cholinergic receptor antagonists inhibit GH secretion in normal man. Whether similar mechanisms are active in subjects with insulin-dependent diabetes is not known, yet this is of potential importance since GH hypersecretion has been implicated in both the acute and chronic complications of diabetes mellitus. To address this question we studied the effects of cholinergic receptor blockade on stimulated GH release in 18 type I diabetic men. Paired tests were performed using 1 of 2 different stimuli (30 g arginine, iv, or physical exercise for 30 min) with or without prior administration of the selective cholinergic muscarinic receptor antagonist pirenzepine (30 mg, iv). Arginine elicited a mean peak serum GH level of 9.0 +/- 1.9 (+/- SEM) micrograms/L, which was completely suppressed by pirenzepine (1.5 +/- 0.4 micrograms/L; n = 8; P less than 0.01). Blood glucose rose after arginine infusion and was not affected by pirenzepine. Serum GH levels rose during physical exercise to a mean peak of 7.3 +/- 1.6 micrograms/L, which was abolished by pirenzepine (1.2 +/- 0.3 micrograms/L; n = 10; P less than 0.01). Blood glucose was not influenced by pirenzepine. Two subjects had no serum GH response to exercise. We conclude that GH secretion in subjects with insulin-dependent diabetes, as in normal subjects, is modulated by cholinergic pathways and is responsive to pharmacological suppression by muscarinic receptor blockade. This may have implications for therapeutic trials designed to lower elevated GH levels in subjects with diabetes mellitus.     

Arginine potentiates but does not restore the blunted growth hormone response to growth hormone-releasing hormone in obesity.

A blunted growth hormone (GH) response to several stimuli, including growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH), has been shown in obesity. Arginine (ARG) has been demonstrated to potentiate the GHRH-induced GH increase in normal subjects, likely acting via inhibition of hypothalamic somatostatin release. To shed further light onto the mechanisms underlying the blunted GH secretion in obesity, we studied the effect of ARG (0.5 g/kg infused intravenously [IV] over 30 minutes) on both basal and GHRH (1 micron/kg IV)-stimulated GH secretion. Eight obese subjects (aged 26.4 +/- 3.9 years; body mass index, 39.0 +/- 1.9 kg/m2) and eight normal control volunteers (aged 27.0 +/- 1.7 years; body mass index, 22.3 +/- 0.5 kg/m2) were studied. In obese subjects, the GH response to both GHRH and ARG was lower (P less than .01 and P less than .002, respectively) than in controls. ARG potentiated the GH response to GHRH in obese patients (P less than .0003). However, in these patients, the GH secretion elicited by GHRH, even when coadministered with ARG, persisted at reduced levels (P less than .005) when compared with controls. Basal insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels did not significantly differ in obese subjects and in normal subjects (161.1 +/- 37.0 v 181.0 +/- 12.8 micrograms/L). In conclusion, ARG enhances the blunted GHRH-induced GH increase in obese patients, but the GH responses to ARG alone and to ARG + GHRH persist at lower levels than in normals. Thus, our results suggest the existence of a reduced pituitary GH pool in obesity.     

Growth hormone does not inhibit its own secretion during prolonged hypoglycemia in man

In man, continuous infusion of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) does not sustain GH secretion, unlike prolonged hypoglycemia. To further evaluate this difference in the stimulation of GH release we measured GH concentrations for 3 h during prolonged insulin-induced hypoglycemia and GHRH-(1-29)NH2 (100 micrograms/h) infusion in normal individuals. We also assessed the GH response to combined and separate administration of insulin and GHRH. Plasma GH levels increased during prolonged hypoglycemia and remained elevated for the third hour (22-24 micrograms/L). GH concentrations increased during GHRH infusion, peaked at 60 min (23.5 micrograms/L), and rapidly declined. Thus, our findings confirmed that prolonged hypoglycemia, unlike GHRH infusion, sustained elevated GH levels and that these high levels did not appear to influence GH secretion from the pituitary. Changes in FFA did not account for the sustained GH secretion. FFA levels initially declined during insulin infusion, but after 3 h of hypoglycemia they returned to near-basal values (basal, 0.1 +/- 0.02 g/L; 180 min, 0.09 +/- 0.02). The maximal GH concentration attained during the combined insulin and GHRH test was significantly higher than that with the insulin tolerance test or GHRH test (insulin plus GHRH, 71.9 +/- 13.5; insulin tolerance test, 34.2 +/- 2.9; P less than 0.025; GHRH test, 27.9 +/- 3.2; P less than 0.02), indicating an additive effect on GH secretion. These data suggest that insulin-induced hypoglycemia stimulates GH secretion through a mechanism partly independent of GHRH. The release from somatostatin inhibition and stimulation through other neuropeptides (e.g. galanin) is suggested as possible causes of hypoglycemia-induced GH secretion.