Efficacy of gabapentin enacarbil in adult patients with severe primary restless legs syndrome

AimAssess efficacy and tolerability of gabapentin enacarbil (GEn) in adults with severe primary restless legs syndrome (RLS).MethodsWe pooled data from three 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trials (NCT00298623, NCT00365352, NCT01332305) across GEn 600-mg, GEn 1200-mg, and placebo treatment groups for severe primary RLS (baseline International Restless Legs Scale (IRLS) total score ≥24). Co-primary end points at week 12 were mean change from baseline in IRLS total score and proportion of responders (“much”/very much” improved) on the investigator-rated Clinical Global Impression – Improvement (CGI-I) Scale. Outcomes for individual IRLS items (eg, sleep, mood, quality of life, pain, safety) were assessed.ResultsA total of 309 patients had severe primary RLS (placebo, n = 110; GEn 600 mg, n = 80; GEn 1200 mg, n = 119). GEn 600 mg and 1200 mg significantly improved least-squares mean IRLS total scores versus placebo at week 12 (placebo, −12.3; GEn 600 mg, −16.3; GEn 1200 mg, −18.0; treatment difference vs. placebo, both p <0.01). Significantly more patients with severe primary RLS treated with GEn 600 mg (64%) and 1200 mg (74%) were CGI-I responders at week 12 versus placebo (42%; p <0.01 for both GEn doses). Both GEn doses led to significant improvements in the other outcomes explored versus placebo at week 12. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were somnolence (GEn, 21–24%; placebo, 3%) and dizziness (GEn, 14–19%; placebo, 3%).ConclusionsGEn (600 mg or 1200 mg) once daily significantly improved RLS symptoms and consequences of these symptoms in severe primary RLS. The most frequent TEAEs were somnolence and dizziness.     

Cabergoline compared to levodopa in the treatment of patients with severe restless legs syndrome: results from a multi-center, randomized, active controlled trial.

We report the first large-scale double-blind, randomly assigned study to compare two active dopaminergic therapies for Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS), the dopamine agonist cabergoline (CAB) and levodopa/benserazide (levodopa). Patients with idiopathic RLS were treated with fixed daily doses of 2 or 3 mg CAB or 200 or 300 mg levodopa for 30 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by changes in the IRLS (International RLS Severity Scale) and by time to discontinuation of treatment due to loss of efficacy or augmentation. 361 of 418 screened patients (age 58 +/- 12 years, 71% females) were randomly assigned and treated (CAB: n = 178; levodopa: n = 183) in 51 centers of four European countries. Baseline IRLS total score was 25.7 +/- 6.8. The baseline-adjusted mean change from baseline to week 6 in IRLS sum score was d = -16.1 in the CAB group and d = -9.5 in the levodopa group (d = -6.6, P < 0.0001). More patients in the levodopa group (24.0%) than in the CAB group (11.9%, P = 0.0029, log-rank test) discontinued because of loss of efficacy (14.2% vs. 7.9%, P = 0.0290) or augmentation (9.8% vs. 4.0%, P = 0.0412). Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 83.1% of the CAB group and in 77.6% of the levodopa group. In both groups, most frequent AEs were gastrointestinal symptoms (CAB: 55.6%, levodopa: 30.6%, P < 0.0001). This first large-scale active controlled study in RLS showed superior efficacy of cabergoline versus levodopa after a 30-week long-term therapy. Tolerability was found more favorable with levodopa than with cabergoline.     

Predictors of clinical response in a double-blind placebo controlled crossover trial of gabapentin enacarbil for restless legs syndrome

ObjectivesRestless Legs Syndrome (RLS) is a sensory-motor disorder which produces sleep disturbance. Using data from a large clinical trial of gabapentin enacarbil (GEn) we sought to assess the ability of baseline, and changes from baseline, in clinical trial endpoints to predict treatment response.MethodsData were derived from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover polysomnography study of gabapentin enacarbil 1200 mg (n = 121) or placebo (n = 123). Efficacy evaluations included: sleep measures from polysomnography, subjective sleep measures, Suggested Immobilization Test (SIT) measures, and International Restless Legs Severity Scale (IRLS) and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I). Correlations were evaluated using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients. Predictors of treatment response were separately assessed for GEn and placebo using categorical IRLS and CGI-I outcomes. Stepwise logistic regression models ascertained which combination of baseline and change from baseline variables predicted response.ResultsModerate to large correlations were observed between changes in the IRLS and changes in subjective sleep for both GEn and placebo, substantially larger for GEn than placebo. Small to moderate correlations were present between the change in IRLS and the change in SIT-discomfort for both GEn and placebo. In the stepwise regression, for both GEn and placebo, baseline and change from baseline SIT discomfort, as well as change in sleep quality, were strong predictors of response.ConclusionsChanges in sleep quality, and baseline and changes in SIT discomfort were prominent predictors of treatment response for GEn and placebo. Predictors of treatment response may allow for more targeted enrollment in future clinical trials and may provide insights into the efficacy of RLS treatments.     

A method to switch from oral dopamine agonists to rotigotine in patients with restless legs syndrome and mild augmentation

BackgroundWe examined the short- and long-term efficacy and tolerability of a cross-titration algorithm from oral dopamine agonists to the rotigotine transdermal patch in patients dissatisfied with their restless legs syndrome (RLS) treatment, predominantly with mild augmentation.MethodsPatients with RLS (n = 20) were recruited at a single site. The cross-titration consisted of decreasing oral dopaminergic agents (ropinirole by 1 mg or pramipexole by 0.25 mg) and increasing rotigotine by 1 mg every two days. Efficacy and adverse events (AEs) were assessed at one, three, six and 12 months after the switch.ResultsPatients had moderate–severe RLS symptoms at the baseline (mean international restless legs syndrome (IRLS) score 19.4 ± 5.5); 85% had augmentation and 45% reported afternoon RLS symptoms. The baseline mean pramipexole equivalent dose was 0.6 ± 0.3 mg. At Week 5, 85% (17/20) had successfully switched from their oral dopamine agonist to rotigotine (mean dose 2.5 ± 0.6 mg; change in IRLS score: −6.7 ± 8.4, p = 0.002); 14 patients were CGI-I responders (much or very much improved). Three patients withdrew due to lack of efficacy. Twelve months after cross-titration, 10 patients continued on rotigotine, of whom four required either higher doses of rotigotine or supplemental RLS medication compared with their optimal Week 5 dose; five patients withdrew due to AEs and two due to lack of efficacy.ConclusionA cross-titration to rotigotine was efficacious after five weeks in 70% of patients dissatisfied with RLS treatment, most of whom had mild augmentation. At one year following the medication switch, 50% had discontinued rotigotine due to lack of continued efficacy or side effects.     

Randomized,placebo-controlled trial of ferric carboxymaltose in restless legs syndrome patients with iron deficiency anemia

ObjectiveIntravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has been shown to be efficacious in treating restless legs syndrome (RLS) symptoms in non-anemic patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of FCM in treating RLS symptoms in patients who also had an iron deficiency anemia (IDA).MethodsThis is a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Subjects with RLS and IDA were enrolled. Subjects received an infusion of either 1500 mg FCM or placebo in Phase I. The primary outcomes were a change-from-baseline at week six on the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group scale (IRLS). Phase II of the study involved long-term (52 weeks) follow-up, for those who responded to treatment in the prior phase, with the potential for further treatment if symptoms returned.ResultsWe enrolled 29 RLS patients with IDA (15 FCM and 14 placebo). At week six post-infusion, FCM compared to placebo group showed significant improvement from baseline in IRLS score (−13.47 ± 7.38 vs. 1.36 ± 3.59). Among secondary outcome variables, quality of sleep showed significant improvement from baseline in the FCM group. 61% of subjects remained off RLS medications at the Phase II, week-52 endpoint. There were no serious adverse events observed in the study.ConclusionThe study showed significant efficacy and safety of FCM 1500 mg treatment both in the short term (6 weeks) and long term (52 weeks) in RLS patients with IDA.     

An open-label study of quetiapine in the treatment of fibromyalgia

The aim of this exploratory study was to systematically assess the potential effectiveness and tolerability of quetiapine, an atypical antipsychotic, for the treatment of patients with fibromyalgia. This was a unicentre, open-label study conducted in thirty-five outpatients, 18 years or older, who met the ACR criteria for fibromyalgia and who had not satisfactorily responded to their previous fibromyalgia treatment. Quetiapine, flexibly dosed (25-100 mg/day), was added to their original treatment regimen for 12 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the mean change from baseline to endpoint in the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) total score. Secondary efficacy measures included mean changes from baseline to endpoint in the scores of the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Severity scale, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), and individual items of the FIQ. Thirty (85.7%) patients (mean age 47+/-7.9, 93.3% females) had a postbaseline evaluation and constituted the intent-to-treat efficacy sample. Mean FIQ total score decreased significantly by 10.2 points from a baseline of 63.2 to 53.0 at study endpoint (p<0.001). A statistically significant reduction was observed in FIQ stiffness and FIQ fatigue subscores but not in FIQ pain subscore. Large effect sizes were observed for the FIQ total (1.04), CGI-severity (1.00) and PSQI (1.07), while moderate effect sizes (i.e.> or =0.50) were encountered in the FIQ fatigue, FIQ stiffness and SF-12 mental component summary. Quetiapine was safely administered and well tolerated. Despite the lack of effect on pain, the significant and relevant improvement in overall efficacy measures and quality of life suggests that quetiapine may be a valuable drug for treatment of patients with fibromyalgia that should be further tested in double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.     

A 52-week open-label study of the long-term safety of ropinirole in patients with restless legs syndrome

OBJECTIVE: To assess the long-term safety and efficacy of ropinirole in the treatment of patients with restless legs syndrome (RLS) over 52 weeks. METHODS: A 52-week, multicentre, open-label continuation study involving 310 patients, conducted in 11 countries. Eligible patients from four parent studies were invited to participate. At parent study entry, all patients had a score of > or =15 on the International Restless Legs Scale (IRLS). In this continuation study, all participants received ropinirole, 0.25-4.0 mg once daily, for 52 weeks. The primary study objective was to evaluate the safety of ropinirole. Efficacy was assessed by change in IRLS score, as well as by global improvements (clinical global impression [CGI] scale) and improvements in measures of sleep, work productivity, and quality of life. RESULTS: Overall, 251 (81.0%) patients completed the study. The mean ropinirole dose at study end was 1.90 mg/day. A total of 282 patients (91.3%) reported > or = 1 adverse event. For the majority of patients, the reported adverse events were mild or moderate in intensity. The most common adverse event was nausea. Adverse events led to discontinuation in 8.7% of patients. At week 52, IRLS scores improved by an average of 12.0 points from baseline, and 82.8% of patients were 'much improved' or 'very much improved' on the CGI-improvement scale. Ropinirole treatment was also associated with improvements in measures of sleep and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Ropinirole was well tolerated and therapeutic efficacy was maintained over 52 weeks in patients with RLS.     

Open-label study of the long-term efficacy and safety of pramipexole in patients with Restless Legs Syndrome (extension of the PRELUDE study)

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the long-term efficacy and safety of pramipexole for Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) using physician and patient RLS ratings, along with subjective assays of sleep parameters, in a 26-week, open-label trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among 107 Finnish adults with moderate to severe RLS, pramipexole initiated at 0.125 mg/day was titrated to a maximum 0.75 mg/day. Efficacy evaluations included the International RLS Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS), Patient Global Impression (PGI) scale, Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) scale, Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), and Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey. Subjective Sleep Quality was assessed by patient ratings of sleep and morning tiredness. Safety was documented by Adverse Events reported in >5% of patients. RESULTS: The mean reduction in IRLS score was 73.5% (P<0.05). The IRLS responder rate, defined by score reduction of >or= 50%, was 81.3%. On the PGI scale, 89.7% of patients rated themselves as "very much" or "much" better. By CGI-I assessment, 94.8% of patients were considered either "very much" or "much" improved. Mean ESS score showed a modest but statistically significant reduction (P<0.05) within the normal range, indicating that long-term pramipexole did not increase daytime sleepiness. On the SF-36 all 8 domains showed improvement, 5 of them statistically significant (P<0.05) and 4 of these 5 (role-physical, bodily pain, vitality, and role-emotional) by >10 points on a 100-point scale. Subjective Sleep Quality also improved. The most frequent Adverse Events were influenza (17.8%), headache (15.0%), and fatigue (10.3%). CONCLUSION: Pramipexole is well tolerated and effective for long-term treatment of RLS.     

Efficacy of pramipexole in restless legs syndrome: a six-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study (effect-RLS study).

We evaluated the efficacy of pramipexole versus placebo in restless legs syndrome (RLS) for 6 weeks. Overall, 345 patients were randomly assigned in a 1:2 ratio to receive either placebo (n = 115) or pramipexole (n = 230) with a starting dose of 0.125 mg/day. The dose was individually optimized according to the Patient Global Impression (PGI) assessment, up to a maximum of 0.75 mg/day. The primary endpoint consisted of two assessments: the change from baseline in the International RLS Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS) and the proportion of patients with Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) assessments of "much/very much improved" (CGI-I responders) at week 6. Secondary endpoints included PGI and IRLS responder rates. Patient demographics and baseline characteristics were comparable between treatment groups. At baseline, mean IRLS scores were 24.9 (placebo) and 24.7 (pramipexole), representing severely affected patients. After 6 weeks, adjusted mean reductions (+/-SE) in IRLS score were 5.7 (+/-0.9) for placebo (median dose 0.47 mg/day) and 12.3 (+/-0.6) for pramipexole (median dose 0.35 mg/day; P < 0.0001). CGI-I responder rates were 32.5% (placebo) and 62.9% (pramipexole) (P < 0.0001). For all secondary endpoints, pramipexole showed superior results. Pramipexole was well tolerated throughout the study.     

不安腿综合征的主观睡眠质量评估及多导睡眠图研究

目的了解不安腿综合征(RLS)患者的主、客观睡眠质量,以及RLS严重程度量表评分与睡眠质量的相关性。方法选取30例RLS患者(RLS组)和30名年龄、性别匹配的健康正常人(对照组),通过BECK抑郁量表、BECK焦虑量表、Chalder疲惫量表、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数量表、Epworth嗜睡量表、RLS生活质量量表评估RLS患者主观睡眠质量及生活质量。运用多导睡眠图分析患者客观睡眠质量情况。对RLS严重程度与睡眠质量进行相关性分析。结果与对照组比较,RLS组抑郁量表评分、Chalder疲惫量表评分、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数量表评分均增高。RLS严重程度量表评分(IRLS)与Chalder疲惫量表评分、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数量表评分及RLS生活质量量表评分具有显著相关性。多导睡眠图检测:RLS组总睡眠时间减少,睡眠效率下降;N1期睡眠比例、入睡后清醒时间及微觉醒指数增高;RLS组睡眠期周期性肢体运动(PLMS)指数显著增高(P0.001)。IRLS评分与PLMS指数具有相关性(r=0.371,P=0.044),而与其他客观睡眠参数无相关性。结论 RLS显著影响患者睡眠质量及生活质量,且主观睡眠质量、生活质量及PLMS指数与IRLS具有相关性。     

Ropinirole is effective in the long-term management of restless legs syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.

The objective of this study was to investigate the long-term efficacy of ropinirole in patients with restless legs syndrome (RLS) and to assess the potential for relapse after the discontinuation of active treatment. Patients with primary RLS (n = 202) received single-blind ropinirole for 24 weeks. Patients meeting treatment continuation criteria were randomized to double-blind treatment with ropinirole or placebo for a further 12 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was the proportion of patients relapsing during double-blind treatment. Additional efficacy measures included time to relapse, withdrawals due to lack of efficacy, improvement on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scale, change in International Restless Legs Scale (IRLS) score during double-blind treatment, and changes in sleep and quality of life (QoL) parameters. Significantly fewer patients relapsed on ropinirole than on placebo (32.6% vs. 57.8%; P = 0.0156). Time to relapse was longer with ropinirole and more patients withdrew due to lack of efficacy with placebo. Patients showed improvements in IRLS and CGI-I scores, sleep and QoL parameters with single-blind ropinirole, which were better maintained when ropinirole was continued during the double-blind phase, but reduced with placebo. Ropinirole was well tolerated; adverse events were typical for dopamine agonists. Ropinirole was highly effective and well tolerated in the long-term management of RLS, with pharmacological effect over 36 weeks.     

Clinical characteristics of restless legs syndrome in end‐stage renal failure and idiopathic RLS patients

This study was done to identify the clinical characteristics of uremic restless legs syndrome (RLS). Consecutive uremic RLS patients (n = 15) and idiopathic RLS patients (iRLS; n = 20) were evaluated. The groups were compared with respect to their clinical course, subjective symptoms [using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and the International Restless Legs Syndrome Severity Scale (IRLS)], polysomnographic (PSG) variables, the results of the suggested immobilization test (SIT), and the drug doses used to treat RLS. The duration of the disorder was significantly shorter in the uremic RLS group than in the iRLS group. The PSQI and IRLS scores before treatment were higher in the uremic RLS group than in the iRLS group. The periodic leg movement index (PLM index) on PSG and the SIT index were also higher in the uremic RLS group (P < 0.001, respectively). The bromocriptine equivalent dose of dopaminergic agonists used to treat RLS was significantly higher in the uremic RLS group (P < 0.001). Uremic RLS appears to deteriorate faster and to become more severe than iRLS. Moreover, uremic RLS patients appear to have a decreased response to dopaminergic agonists. © 2007 Movement Disorder Society     

普拉克索治疗原发性不宁腿综合征的疗效和安全陛观察

目的 观察普拉克索对我国原发性不宁腿综合征(RLS)患者的治疗效果以及可能发生的不良反应. 方法 选择自2009年5月至11月在哈尔滨医科大学第二附属医院神经内科就诊的10例中到重度原发性RLS患者,给予普拉克索0.125～0.75mg/d,每日睡前2～3h顿服,持续治疗6周.利用国际RLS研究小组的RLS严重程度量表(mLS)、临床总体印象改善量表(CGI-I)、患者总体印象量表(PGI)和Epworth嗜睡量表(ESS)对患者治疗前后的RLS症状严重程度和嗜睡程度进行评估.并对结果进行统计学分析,同时记录不良反应.结果 (1)治疗后患者的IRLS评分较治疗前平均降低73.7%,比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),9例患者IRLS评分降低在50%以上;(2)治疗结束时,8例患者PGI评估选择"很好"或"非常好",9例患者CGI-I评估为"明显改善"或"非常明显改善";(3)患者ESS评分在治疗后较治疗前平均降低3.80±1.75,比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);(4)1例患者在治疗末期加量至0.5mg/d时出现轻度恶心,胃区不适,治疗结束停药2 d后症状自行消失;(5)1例患者首次用药后双下肢感觉异常和睡眠障碍即有明显改善.结论 为期6周的临床实验表明,在每日口服剂量为0.125～0.75 mg时,普拉克索对于我国原发性RLS的治疗是安全有效的.     

Impact of sleep-related complaints on depressive symptoms in patients with restless legs syndrome

OBJECTIVE: Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a distressing sensorimotor disorder with a 5% to 10% prevalence in the United States and Western Europe. The nocturnal occurrence of symptoms often leads to severe sleep disturbances. RLS has been reported to be associated with depression and anxiety. The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between RLS symptom severity, sleep disturbances, and depressive symptoms. METHOD: Questionnaire data from 100 consecutive patients with idiopathic RLS who had been investigated in our Sleep Disorders Unit from April 1999 to December 2004 were evaluated. Patients were untreated regarding RLS, depression, or sleep disturbances. Severity of RLS was assessed with the International RLS Study Group rating scale (IRLS). Depressive symptoms and subjective sleep quality were determined using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), respectively. RESULTS: IRLS scores indicated moderate-to-severe RLS symptoms in the population studied (mean +/- SD IRLS score = 23.6 +/- 6.7). The mean +/- SD BDI score was 9.3 +/- 5.6, with highest values on the "reduced sleep," "loss of energy," and "work difficulties" items, indicating predominating somatic symptoms of depression. Fourteen patients had a BDI score of 15 to 20 ("mild depression"), and 3 patients had a BDI score of 20 to 30 ("mild to moderate depression"). Overall, patients estimated their sleep quality as moderately impaired (mean +/- SD PSQI score = 10.9 +/- 3.7). Severity of RLS correlated with the impairment of subjective sleep quality (r = 0.281, p = .007) but not with self-rated depressive symptoms (r = 0.119, p = .237). CONCLUSION: RLS patients scored high on the somatic items of the BDI, particularly on those related to sleep disturbance, but not on the other items that mostly address cognitive symptoms. Our results indicate that RLS might be associated with some features of depression but not with the full spectrum of a depressive disorder. The relationship between the 2 disorders should be investigated in further studies.     

普拉克索治疗原发性不安腿综合征疗效观察

目的观察普拉克索治疗原发性不安腿综合征（RLS）的临床疗效及安全性。方法将66例原发性RLS患者随机分为普拉克索组与美多巴组,应用国际不安腿综合征评估量表（IRLS）和汉密尔顿抑郁量表（HAMD）分别于治疗前及治疗后6周进行病情评估,观察比较2组治疗前后各量表评分情况,并记录2组患者出现的药物不良反应。结果2组患者治疗后IRLS与HAMD评分较治疗前均明显下降（P〈0．05）,相比美多巴组,普拉克索组治疗后IRLS评分差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）,但HAMD评分下降更为明显（P〈0．01）,2组药物不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。结论普拉克索能有效缓解原发性RLS症状,且药物不良反应较小,相比美多巴其抗抑郁的优势更为明显。     

Relationship of periodic leg movements and severity of restless legs syndrome: a study in unmedicated and medicated patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship of the severity of restless legs syndrome (RLS) as assessed by a subjective, patient-rated scale (International RLS Study Group Rating Scale, IRLS), and of periodic leg movements in sleep (PLMS) as an objective parameter, in two different patient populations. METHODS: Data of 200 unmedicated patients with idiopathic RLS were evaluated. Group 1 (n=100) consisted of selected patients participating in the Pergolide European Australian RLS (PEARLS) study. Group 2 (n=100) represented an outpatient RLS population investigated in a Sleep Disorders Center. Additionally, Group 1 was also evaluated after a 6 week double-blind treatment period, where 47 patients received pergolide and 53 patients placebo. RESULTS: In unmedicated patients, IRLS scores correlated with the PLMS-arousal index (r=0.22, p=0.033) but not with the PLMS index in Group 1 while no correlation was found in Group 2. The change of the IRLS score under treatment in Group 1 correlated significantly both with the change of the PLMS index (r=0.42, p<0.001) and the change of the PLMS-arousal index (r=0.38, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The IRLS adequately reflects treatment changes of PLMS indices. In unmedicated patients, the IRLS correlates with PLMS indices probably only in selected RLS populations with predefined PSG criteria and high PLM activity. SIGNIFICANCE: The IRLS is an appropriate subjective rating scale for measuring treatment effects in RLS.     

Systematic evaluation of augmentation during treatment with ropinirole in restless legs syndrome (Willis-Ekbom disease): results from a prospective, multicenter study over 66 weeks

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of augmentation over 66 weeks of treatment with ropinirole in patients with primary restless legs syndrome (RLS). Augmentation is the main complication of long-term dopaminergic treatment of RLS. Despite widespread use of ropinirole in RLS, no studies have prospectively and systematically assessed the incidence of augmentation with its use. The study consisted of 26 weeks of double-blind flexible-dose treatment with ropinirole or placebo, followed by 40 weeks of open-label ropinirole treatment.. Patients had no previous history of augmentation. Potential cases of augmentation were identified with the Structured Interview for the Diagnosis of Augmentation and the Augmentation Severity Rating Scale and through reporting of adverse events. Cases were blindly evaluated by an expert panel using the NIH diagnostic criteria for augmentation. Four hundred and four patients participated in the double-blind study and 269 in the open-label phase, with a discontinuation rate of 42%. IRLS baseline scores improved at the end of the double-blind (DB) phase (mean ± SE) by -15.9 ± 0.76 for ropinirole, by -13.4 ± 0.77 for placebo (P < .05) and by -20.4 ± 0.55 during the open-label phase. The incidence rates of augmentation were 3.5% for ropinirole and <1% for placebo during the DB phase and 3% during the open-label phase. Clinically significant augmentation occurred in 3%, <1%, and 2%, respectively. Discontinuation of treatment occurred in 50% of all patients (7 of 14) with augmentation. The incidence of augmentation was 3.1% higher with ropinirole than with placebo. New patients with first episodes of augmentation continued to cumulate at a stable rate over the duration of this study.     

Ropinirole is effective in the treatment of restless legs syndrome. TREAT RLS 2: a 12-week, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study.

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a neurological condition with significant impact on sleep and quality of life (QoL). This double-blind, randomized, 12-week, multinational study compared the efficacy and safety of ropinirole and placebo in RLS. In total, 267 outpatients with moderate-to-severe RLS were randomly assigned to ropinirole (0.25-4.0 mg/day) or placebo, 1 to 3 hours before bedtime. The primary endpoint was the change in International Restless Legs Scale (IRLS) score at week 12. Key secondary endpoints were the percentage of patients showing significant improvement on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scale at week 12 and changes in IRLS and CGI-I scale scores at week 1. Other measures included the Medical Outcomes Study sleep scale and Restless Legs Syndrome Quality of Life questionnaire. Improvements were significantly greater for ropinirole than placebo for change in IRLS score at week 12 (-11.2 [SE 0.76] vs. -8.7 [0.75], respectively; adjusted treatment difference -2.5 [95% confidence interval [CI], -4.6, -0.4], P = 0.0197); all key secondary endpoints; sleep and QoL parameters. Adverse events were typical for dopamine agonists; disease augmentation, although not directly assessed, was not reported during treatment. Ropinirole improves symptoms, associated sleep disturbance, and QoL of RLS patients and is generally well tolerated.     

Enhanced external counter pulsation (EECP) as a novel treatment for restless legs syndrome (RLS): a preliminary test of the vascular neurologic hypothesis for RLS

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Enhanced external counter pulsation (EECP) is used to treat angina. With sustained treatment this increases collateral circulation to the coronary arteries as well as to the body as a whole. We found some patients who underwent EECP for angina or congestive heart failure who also coincidentally had severe Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS). Case reports are presented. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six patients with RLS (1F, 5M, ages 55-80) underwent EECP treatment. All patients were given the International RLS Study Group rating scale for RLS (the IRLS) before and immediately after 35 days of EECP treatment. RESULTS: The average IRLS rating scale score of the six patients before treatment was 28.8 (range 23-35), which indicates frequent and moderate to very severe RLS. After 35 days of EECP treatment the IRLS score was 6 (P<0.03), which indicates clinically insignificant RLS. Long-term follow-up in three patients indicates sustained improvement in all three at 3-6 months after EECP was completed (IRLS score 28.3-3.33). Further follow-up in four patients showed sustained improvement in two patients 1 year after EECP was completed. CONCLUSION: EECP improves RLS symptoms significantly and could be considered as an adjunct treatment for patients with RLS. In some cases, the improvement lasts for months after the course of treatment. In this way EECP is unique and unlike pharmacotherapy which requires continuous daily treatment. Furthermore, our results suggest that decreases in vascular flow influence the peripheral or central nervous system leading to the sensory symptoms of RLS. A larger number of patients studied under blinded conditions is needed to draw further conclusions.