SLFN11 promotes CDT1 degradation by CUL4 in response to replicative DNA damage,while its absence leads to synthetic lethality with ATR/CHK1 inhibitors

Schlafen-11 (SLFN11) inactivation in ∼50% of cancer cells confers broad chemoresistance. To identify therapeutic targets and underlying molecular mechanisms for overcoming chemoresistance, we performed an unbiased genome-wide RNAi screen in SLFN11-WT and -knockout (KO) cells. We found that inactivation of Ataxia Telangiectasia- and Rad3-related (ATR), CHK1, BRCA2, and RPA1 overcome chemoresistance to camptothecin (CPT) in SLFN11-KO cells. Accordingly, we validate that clinical inhibitors of ATR (M4344 and M6620) and CHK1 (SRA737) resensitize SLFN11-KO cells to topotecan, indotecan, etoposide, cisplatin, and talazoparib. We uncover that ATR inhibition significantly increases mitotic defects along with increased CDT1 phosphorylation, which destabilizes kinetochore-microtubule attachments in SLFN11-KO cells. We also reveal a chemoresistance mechanism by which CDT1 degradation is retarded, eventually inducing replication reactivation under DNA damage in SLFN11-KO cells. In contrast, in SLFN11-expressing cells, SLFN11 promotes the degradation of CDT1 in response to CPT by binding to DDB1 of CUL4^CDT2 E3 ubiquitin ligase associated with replication forks. We show that the C terminus and ATPase domain of SLFN11 are required for DDB1 binding and CDT1 degradation. Furthermore, we identify a therapy-relevant ATPase mutant (E669K) of the SLFN11 gene in human TCGA and show that the mutant contributes to chemoresistance and retarded CDT1 degradation. Taken together, our study reveals new chemotherapeutic insights on how targeting the ATR pathway overcomes chemoresistance of SLFN11-deficient cancers. It also demonstrates that SLFN11 irreversibly arrests replication by degrading CDT1 through the DDB1–CUL4^CDT2 ubiquitin ligase.

Schlafen-11 (SLFN11) is an emergent restriction factor against genomic instability acting by eliminating cells with replicative damage (1–6) and potentially acting as a tumor suppressor (6, 7). SLFN11-expressing cancer cells are consistently hypersensitive to a broad range of chemotherapeutic drugs targeting DNA replication, including topoisomerase inhibitors, alkylating agents, DNA synthesis, and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors compared to SLFN11-deficient cancer cells, which are chemoresistant (1, 2, 4, 8–17). Profiling SLFN11 expression is being explored for patients to predict survival and guide therapeutic choice (8, 13, 18–24).The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and cancer cell databases demonstrate that SLFN11 mRNA expression is suppressed in a broad fraction of common cancer tissues and in ∼50% of all established cancer cell lines across multiple histologies (1, 2, 5, 8, 13, 25, 26). Silencing of the SLFN11 gene, like known tumor suppressor genes, is under epigenetic mechanisms through hypermethylation of its promoter region and activation of histone deacetylases (HDACs) (21, 23, 25, 26). A recent study in small-cell lung cancer patient-derived xenograft models also showed that SLFN11 gene silencing is caused by local chromatin condensation related to deposition of H3K27me3 in the gene body of SLFN11 by EZH2, a histone methyltransferase (11). Targeting epigenetic regulators is therefore an attractive combination strategy to overcome chemoresistance of SLFN11-deficient cancers (10, 25, 26). An alternative approach is to attack SLFN11-negative cancer cells by targeting the essential pathways that cells use to overcome replicative damage and replication stress. Along these lines, a prior study showed that inhibition of ATR (Ataxia Telangiectasia- and Rad3-related) kinase reverses the resistance of SLFN11-deficient cancer cells to PARP inhibitors (4). However, targeting the ATR pathway in SLFN11-deficient cells has not yet been fully explored.SLFN11 consists of two functional domains: A conserved nuclease motif in its N terminus and an ATPase motif (putative helicase) in its C terminus (2, 6). The N terminus nuclease has been implicated in the selective degradation of type II tRNAs (including those coding for ATR) and its nuclease structure can be derived from crystallographic analysis of SLFN13 whose N terminus domain is conserved with SLFN11 (27, 28). The C terminus is only present in the group III Schlafen family (24, 29). Its potential ATPase activity and relationship to chemosensitivity to DNA-damaging agents (3–5) imply that the ATPase/helicase of SLFN11 is involved specifically in DNA damage response (DDR) to replication stress. Indeed, inactivation of the Walker B motif of SLFN11 by the mutation E669Q suppresses SLFN11-mediated replication block (5, 30). In addition, SLFN11 contains a binding site for the single-stranded DNA binding protein RPA1 (replication protein A1) at its C terminus (3, 31) and is recruited to replication damage sites by RPA (3, 5). The putative ATPase activity of SLFN11 is not required for this recruitment (5) but is required for blocking the replication helicase complex (CMG-CDC45) and inducing chromatin accessibility at replication origins and promoter sites (5, 30). Based on these studies, our current model is that SLFN11 is recruited to “stressed” replication forks by RPA filaments formed on single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), and that the ATPase/helicase activity of SLFN11 is required for blocking replication progression and remodeling chromatin (5, 30). However, underlying mechanisms of how SLFN11 irreversibly blocks replication in DNA damage are still unclear.Increased RPA-coated ssDNA caused by DNA damage and replication fork stalling also triggers ATR kinase activation, promoting subsequent phosphorylation of CHK1, which transiently halts cell cycle progression and enables DNA repair (32). ATR inhibitors are currently in clinical development in combination with DNA replication damaging drugs (33, 34), such as topoisomerase I (TOP1) inhibitors, which are highly synergistic with ATR inhibitors in preclinical models (35). ATR inhibitors not only inhibit DNA repair, but also lead to unscheduled replication origin firing (36), which kills cancer cells (37, 38) by inducing genomic alterations due to faulty replication and mitotic catastrophe (33).The replication licensing factor CDT1 orchestrates the initiation of replication by assembling prereplication complexes (pre-RC) in G1-phase before cells enter S-phase (39). Once replication is started by loading and activation of the MCM helicase, CDT1 is degraded by the ubiquitin proteasomal pathway to prevent additional replication initiation and ensure precise genome duplication and the firing of each origin only once per cell cycle (39, 40). At the end of G2 and during mitosis, CDT1 levels rise again to control kinetochore-microtubule attachment for accurate chromosome segregation (41). Deregulated overexpression of CDT1 results in rereplication, genome instability, and tumorigenesis (42). The cellular CDT1 levels are tightly regulated by the damage-specific DNA binding protein 1 (DDB1)–CUL4^CDT2 E3 ubiquitin ligase complex in G1-phase (43) and in response to DNA damage (44, 45). How CDT1 is recognized by CUL4^CDT2 in response to DNA damage remains incompletely known.In the present study, starting with a human genome-wide RNAi screen, bioinformatics analyses, and mechanistic validations, we explored synthetic lethal interactions that overcome the chemoresistance of SLFN11-deficient cells to the TOP1 inhibitor camptothecin (CPT). The strongest synergistic interaction was between depletion of the ATR/CHK1-mediated DNA damage response pathways and DNA-damaging agents in SLFN11-deficient cells. We validated and expanded our molecular understanding of combinatorial strategies in SLFN11-deficient cells with the ATR (M4344 and M6620) and CHK1 (SRA737) inhibitors in clinical development (33, 46, 47) and found that ATR inhibition leads to CDT1 stabilization and hyperphosphorylation with mitotic catastrophe. Our study also establishes that SLFN11 promotes the degradation of CDT1 by binding to DDB1, an adaptor molecule of the CUL4^CDT2 E3 ubiquitin ligase complex, leading to an irreversible replication block in response to replicative DNA damage.     

CAP1 binds and activates adenylyl cyclase in mammalian cells

CAP1 (Cyclase-Associated Protein 1) is highly conserved in evolution. Originally identified in yeast as a bifunctional protein involved in Ras-adenylyl cyclase and F-actin dynamics regulation, the adenylyl cyclase component seems to be lost in mammalian cells. Prompted by our recent identification of the Ras-like small GTPase Rap1 as a GTP-independent but geranylgeranyl-specific partner for CAP1, we hypothesized that CAP1-Rap1, similar to CAP-Ras-cyclase in yeast, might play a critical role in cAMP dynamics in mammalian cells. In this study, we report that CAP1 binds and activates mammalian adenylyl cyclase in vitro, modulates cAMP in live cells in a Rap1-dependent manner, and affects cAMP-dependent proliferation. Utilizing deletion and mutagenesis approaches, we mapped the interaction of CAP1-cyclase with CAP’s N-terminal domain involving critical leucine residues in the conserved RLE motifs and adenylyl cyclase’s conserved catalytic loops (e.g., C1a and/or C2a). When combined with a FRET-based cAMP sensor, CAP1 overexpression–knockdown strategies, and the use of constitutively active and negative regulators of Rap1, our studies highlight a critical role for CAP1-Rap1 in adenylyl cyclase regulation in live cells. Similarly, we show that CAP1 modulation significantly affected cAMP-mediated proliferation in an RLE motif–dependent manner. The combined study indicates that CAP1-cyclase-Rap1 represents a regulatory unit in cAMP dynamics and biology. Since Rap1 is an established downstream effector of cAMP, we advance the hypothesis that CAP1-cyclase-Rap1 represents a positive feedback loop that might be involved in cAMP microdomain establishment and localized signaling.

CAP/srv2 was originally identified in yeast biochemically as an adenylyl cyclase–associated protein (1) and genetically as a suppressor of the hyperactive Ras2-V19 allele (2). CAP/srv2-deficient yeast cells are unresponsive to active Ras2, and adenylyl cyclase activity is no longer regulated by Ras2 in these cells (1, 2), indicating the involvement of CAP/srv2 in the Ras/cyclase pathway. However, some mutant CAP/srv2 alleles presented phenotypes not observed in strains with impaired Ras/cyclase pathway (1–3), indicating the existence of Ras/cyclase-independent functions downstream of CAP/srv2. These two phenotype groups, that is, Ras/cyclase-linked and Ras/cyclase-independent, could be suppressed by expression of an N-terminal half and a C-terminal half of CAP/srv2, respectively (4). Subsequent studies showed that the C-terminal half of CAP/srv2 was able to bind monomeric G-actin (5–8) and other actin regulators establishing a role in F-actin dynamics (9–16). Thus, CAP/srv2 is a bifunctional protein with an N-terminal domain involved in Ras/cyclase regulation and a C-terminal domain involved with F-actin dynamics regulation (16–18).CAP1 is structurally conserved in all eukaryotes (18–22); however, their functions are not. Expression of the closely related Schizosaccharomyces pombe cap or mammalian CAP1 in yeast can only suppress the phenotypes associated with deletion of CAP/srv2’s C-terminal but not its N-terminal domain (19, 20, 22), suggesting that only the F-actin dynamics function was conserved while the Ras/cyclase regulation diverged early on in evolution (16–18). CAP/srv2’s N-terminal 1 to 36 domain was sufficient for cyclase binding in yeast involving a conserved RLE motif with predicted coiled-coil folding (23). Interestingly, this domain is also involved in CAP1 oligomerization both in yeast and mammalian cells (24–26), where it purifies as a high-molecular complex of ∼600 kDa consistent with a 1:1 stoichiometric CAP1-actin hexameric organization (12, 25, 27, 28). Importantly, removal of this domain disrupted CAP1 oligomerization, reduced F-actin turnover in vitro and caused defects in cell growth, cell morphology, and F-actin organization in vivo (24, 29). However, whether the conserved RLE motif in mammalian CAP1 interacts with other coiled-coil–containing proteins is for the moment unknown.Ras2-mediated cyclase regulation in yeast requires its farnesylation (30–32). However, the lipid target involved was not identified in the original studies. We have recently shown that mammalian CAP1 interacts with the small GTPase Rap1. The interaction involves Rap1’s C-terminal hypervariable region (HVR) and its lipid moiety in a geranylgeranyl-specific manner; that is, neither the closely related Ras1 nor engineered farnesylated Rap1 interacted with CAP1 (33). Thus, we raised the question whether CAP1-Rap1, similar to CAP/srv2-Ras2 in yeast, plays a role in cAMP dynamics in mammalian cells.In this study, we report that CAP1 binds to and activates mammalian adenylyl cyclase in vitro. The interaction involves CAP1’s conserved RLE motifs and cyclase’s conserved catalytic subdomains (e.g., C1a and/or C2a). Most importantly, we show that both CAP1 and Rap1 modulate cAMP dynamics in live cells and are critical players in cAMP-dependent proliferation.     

A limited role of NKCC1 in telencephalic glutamatergic neurons for developing hippocampal network dynamics and behavior

NKCC1 is the primary transporter mediating chloride uptake in immature principal neurons, but its role in the development of in vivo network dynamics and cognitive abilities remains unknown. Here, we address the function of NKCC1 in developing mice using electrophysiological, optical, and behavioral approaches. We report that NKCC1 deletion from telencephalic glutamatergic neurons decreases in vitro excitatory actions of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and impairs neuronal synchrony in neonatal hippocampal brain slices. In vivo, it has a minor impact on correlated spontaneous activity in the hippocampus and does not affect network activity in the intact visual cortex. Moreover, long-term effects of the developmental NKCC1 deletion on synaptic maturation, network dynamics, and behavioral performance are subtle. Our data reveal a neural network function of NKCC1 in hippocampal glutamatergic neurons in vivo, but challenge the hypothesis that NKCC1 is essential for major aspects of hippocampal development.

Intracellular chloride concentration ([Cl⁻]_i) is a major determinant of neuronal excitability, as synaptic inhibition is primarily mediated by chloride-permeable receptors (1). In the mature brain, [Cl⁻]_i is maintained at low levels by chloride extrusion, which renders γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) hyperpolarizing (2) and counteracts activity-dependent chloride loads (3). GABAergic inhibition in the adult is crucial not only for preventing runaway excitation of glutamatergic cells (4) but also for entraining neuronal assemblies into oscillations underlying cognitive processing (5). However, the capacity of chloride extrusion is low during early brain development (6, 7). Additionally, immature neurons are equipped with chloride uptake mechanisms, particularly with the Na⁺/K⁺/2Cl⁻ cotransporter NKCC1 (8–12). NKCC1 contributes to the maintenance of high [Cl⁻]_i in the developing brain (13), favoring depolarization through GABA_A receptor (GABA_AR) activation in vivo (14, 15).When GABA acts as a depolarizing neurotransmitter, neural circuits generate burst-like spontaneous activity (16–20), which is crucial for their developmental refinement (21–24). In vitro evidence indicates that GABAergic interneurons promote neuronal synchrony in an NKCC1-dependent manner (10, 12, 25–28). However, the in vivo developmental functions of NKCC1 are far from understood (29, 30). One fundamental question is to what extent NKCC1 and GABAergic depolarization supports correlated spontaneous activity in the neonatal brain. In the neocortex, GABA imposes spatiotemporal inhibition on network activity already in the neonatal period (14, 25, 31, 32). Whether a similar situation applies to other brain regions is unknown, as two recent chemo- and optogenetic studies in the hippocampus yielded opposing results (25, 33). Manipulations of the chloride driving force are potentially suited to resolve these divergent findings, but pharmacological (34–36) or conventional knockout (10, 11, 37) strategies suffer from unspecific effects that complicate interpretations.Here, we overcome this limitation by selectively deleting Slc12a2 (encoding NKCC1) from telencephalic glutamatergic neurons. We show that chloride uptake via NKCC1 promotes synchronized activity in acute hippocampal slices, but has weak and event type-dependent effects in CA1 in vivo. Long-term loss of NKCC1 leads to subtle changes of network dynamics in the adult, leaving synaptic development unperturbed and behavioral performance intact. Our data suggest that NKCC1-dependent chloride uptake is largely dispensable for several key aspects of hippocampal development in vivo.     

Replisome bypass of a protein-based R-loop block by Pif1

Efficient and faithful replication of the genome is essential to maintain genome stability. Replication is carried out by a multiprotein complex called the replisome, which encounters numerous obstacles to its progression. Failure to bypass these obstacles results in genome instability and may facilitate errors leading to disease. Cells use accessory helicases that help the replisome bypass difficult barriers. All eukaryotes contain the accessory helicase Pif1, which tracks in a 5′–3′ direction on single-stranded DNA and plays a role in genome maintenance processes. Here, we reveal a previously unknown role for Pif1 in replication barrier bypass. We use an in vitro reconstituted Saccharomyces cerevisiae replisome to demonstrate that Pif1 enables the replisome to bypass an inactive (i.e., dead) Cas9 (dCas9) R-loop barrier. Interestingly, dCas9 R-loops targeted to either strand are bypassed with similar efficiency. Furthermore, we employed a single-molecule fluorescence visualization technique to show that Pif1 facilitates this bypass by enabling the simultaneous removal of the dCas9 protein and the R-loop. We propose that Pif1 is a general displacement helicase for replication bypass of both R-loops and protein blocks.

Efficient and faithful replication of the genome is essential to maintain genome stability and is carried out by a multiprotein complex called the replisome (1–4). There are numerous obstacles to progression of the replisome during the process of chromosome duplication. These obstacles include RNA-DNA hybrids (R-loops), DNA secondary structures, transcribing RNA polymerases, and other tightly bound proteins (5–9). Failure to bypass these barriers may result in genome instability, which can lead to cellular abnormalities and genetic disease. Cells contain various accessory helicases that help the replisome bypass these difficult barriers (10–20). A subset of these helicases act on the opposite strand of the replicative helicase (1, 2, 14, 19).All eukaryotes contain an accessory helicase, Pif1, which tracks in a 5′–3′ direction on single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) (11–16). Pif1 is important in pathways such as Okazaki-fragment processing and break-induced repair that require the removal of DNA-binding proteins as well as potential displacement of R-loops (11–13, 21, 15–18, 22–25). Genetic studies and immunoprecipitation pull-down assays indicate that Pif1 interacts with PCNA (the DNA sliding clamp), Pol ε (the leading-strand polymerase), the MCMs (the motor subunits of the replicative helicase CMG), and RPA (the single-stranded DNA-binding protein) (15, 26, 27). Pif1 activity in break-induced repair strongly depends on its interaction with PCNA (26). These interactions with replisomal components suggest that Pif1 could interact with the replisome during replication. In Escherichia coli, the replicative helicase is the DnaB homohexamer that encircles the lagging strand and moves in a 5′–3′ direction (20). E. coli accessory helicases include the monomeric UvrD (helicase II) and Rep, which move in the 3′–5′ direction and operate on the opposite strand from the DnaB hexamer. It is known that these monomeric helicases promote the bypass of barriers during replication such as stalled RNA polymerases (5). The eukaryotic replicative helicase is the 11-subunit CMG (Cdc45, Mcm2–7, GINS) and tracks in the 3′–5′ direction, opposite to the direction of Pif1 (25, 28). Once activated by Mcm10, the MCM motor domains of CMG encircle the leading strand (29–32). We hypothesized that, similar to UvrD and Rep in E. coli, Pif1 interacts with the replisome tracking in the opposite direction to enable bypass of replication obstacles.In this report, we use an in vitro reconstituted Saccharomyces cerevisiae replisome to study the role of Pif1 in bypass of a “dead” Cas9 (dCas9), which is a Cas9 protein that is deactivated in DNA cleavage but otherwise fully functional in DNA binding. As with Cas9, dCas9 is a single-turnover enzyme that can be programmed with a guide RNA (gRNA) to target either strand. The dCas9–gRNA complex forms a roadblock consisting of an R-loop and a tightly bound protein (dCas9), a construct that is similar to a stalled RNA polymerase. This roadblock (hereafter dCas9 R-loop) arrests replisomes independent of whether the dCas9 R-loop is targeted to the leading or lagging strand (30). Besides its utility due to its programmable nature (33), the use of the dCas9 R-loop allows us to answer several mechanistic questions. For example, the ability to program the dCas9 R-loop block to any specific sequence enables us to observe whether block removal is different depending on whether the block is on the leading or lagging strand. Furthermore, the inner diameter of CMG can accommodate double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) and possibly an R-loop, but not a dCas9 protein. Using the dCas9 R-loop block allows us to determine the fate of each of its components.Here, we report that Pif1 enables the bypass of the dCas9 R-loop by the replisome. Interestingly, dCas9 R-loops targeted to either the leading or lagging strand are bypassed with similar efficiency. In addition, the PCNA clamp is not required for bypass of the block, indicating that Pif1 does not need to interact with PCNA during bypass of the block. We used a single-molecule fluorescence imaging to show that both the dCas9 and the R-loop are displaced as an intact nucleoprotein complex. We propose that Pif1 is a general displacement helicase for replication bypass of both R-loops and protein blocks.     

Design of a native-like secreted form of the hepatitis C virus E1E2 heterodimer

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a major worldwide health burden, and a preventive vaccine is needed for global control or eradication of this virus. A substantial hurdle to an effective HCV vaccine is the high variability of the virus, leading to immune escape. The E1E2 glycoprotein complex contains conserved epitopes and elicits neutralizing antibody responses, making it a primary target for HCV vaccine development. However, the E1E2 transmembrane domains that are critical for native assembly make it challenging to produce this complex in a homogenous soluble form that is reflective of its state on the viral envelope. To enable rational design of an E1E2 vaccine, as well as structural characterization efforts, we have designed a soluble, secreted form of E1E2 (sE1E2). As with soluble glycoprotein designs for other viruses, it incorporates a scaffold to enforce assembly in the absence of the transmembrane domains, along with a furin cleavage site to permit native-like heterodimerization. This sE1E2 was found to assemble into a form closer to its expected size than full-length E1E2. Preservation of native structural elements was confirmed by high-affinity binding to a panel of conformationally specific monoclonal antibodies, including two neutralizing antibodies specific to native E1E2 and to its primary receptor, CD81. Finally, sE1E2 was found to elicit robust neutralizing antibodies in vivo. This designed sE1E2 can both provide insights into the determinants of native E1E2 assembly and serve as a platform for production of E1E2 for future structural and vaccine studies, enabling rational optimization of an E1E2-based antigen.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a global disease burden, with an estimated 71 million people infected worldwide (1, 2). Roughly 75% of HCV infections become chronic (3–5) and in severe cases can result in cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma (6). Viral infection can be cured at high rates by direct-acting antivirals, but multiple public health and financial barriers (7, 8), along with the possibility of reinfection or continued disease progression (7, 9, 10), have resulted in a continued rise in HCV infections. An HCV vaccine remains essential to proactively protect against viral spread, yet vaccine developments against the virus have been unsuccessful to date (11, 12). The challenges posed by HCV sequence diversity (12, 13), glycan shielding (14, 15), immunodominant nonneutralizing epitopes (16–19), and preparation of a homogeneous E1E2 antigen all contribute to the difficulty in generating protective B cell immune responses. Although multiple studies in chimpanzees and humans have used E1E2 formulations to induce a humoral immune response, their success in generating high titers of broadly neutralizing antibody (bnAb) responses has been limited (20). Optimization of E1E2 to improve its immunogenicity and elicitation of bnAbs through rational design may lead to an effective B cell-based vaccine (21).HCV envelope glycoproteins E1 and E2 form a heterodimer on the surface of the virion (22–24). Furthermore, E1E2 assembly has been proposed to form a trimer of heterodimers (25) mediated by hydrophobic C-terminal transmembrane domains (TMDs) (24, 26, 27) and interactions between E1 and E2 ectodomains (28–30). These glycoproteins are necessary for viral entry and infection, as E2 attaches to the CD81 and SR-B1 coreceptors as part of a multistep entry process on the surface of hepatocytes (31–34). Neutralizing antibody responses to HCV infection target epitopes in E1, E2, or the E1E2 heterodimer (18, 35–40). Structural knowledge of bnAb antibody–antigen interactions, which often target E2 epitopes in distinct antigenic domains B, D, or E (18, 41, 42), can inform vaccine design efforts to induce bnAb responses against flexible HCV epitopes (43–45). E1E2 bnAbs, including AR4A, AR5A (46), and others recently identified (38), are not only among the most broadly neutralizing (35) but also represent E1E2 quaternary epitopes unique to antibody recognition of HCV.Although much is known about bnAb responses to E1E2 glycoproteins, induction of B cell-based immunity with an E1E2-based vaccine immunogen (47–49) has remained difficult. The inherent hydrophobicity of E1 and E2 TMDs (24, 50) may impede uniform production of an immunogenic E1E2 heterodimer that could be utilized for both vaccine development and E1E2 structural studies. Although partial E1 and E2 structures have been determined (39, 51–54), many other enveloped viruses have structures of a complete and near-native glycoprotein assembly (55–59), providing a basis for rational vaccine design (60–62). Viral glycoproteins of influenza hemagglutinin (63), respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) (55), severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (64), and others (65, 66) have been stabilized in soluble form using a C-terminal attached foldon trimerization domain to facilitate assembly. HIV gp120–gp41 proteins have been designed as soluble SOSIP trimers in part by introducing a furin cleavage site to facilitate native-like assembly when cleaved by the enzyme (56, 67). Previously described E1E2 glycoprotein designs include covalently linked E1 and E2 ectodomains (68, 69), E1E2 with TMDs intact and an immunoglobulin G (IgG) Fc tag for purification (70), as well as E1 and E2 ectodomains with a cleavage site (68), which presented challenges for purification either due to intracellular expression or to high heterogeneity. Two recently described scaffolded E1E2 designs, while promising, have not been shown to engage monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that recognize the native E1E2 assembly, though they were engaged by E1-specific and E2-specific mAbs, as well as coreceptors that recognize E2 (71). Therefore, these presentations of E1E2 glycoproteins may not represent a native and immunogenic heterodimeric assembly, and thus their potential as vaccine candidates remains unclear.Here, we describe the design of a secreted E1E2 glycoprotein (sE1E2) that mimics both the antigenicity in vitro and the immunogenicity in vivo of the native heterodimer through the scaffolding of E1E2 ectodomains. In testing our designs, we found that both replacing E1E2 TMDs with a leucine zipper scaffold and inserting a furin cleavage site between E1 and E2 enabled secretion and native-like sE1E2 assembly. We assessed the size, heterogeneity, antigenicity, and immunogenicity of this construct (identified as sE1E2.LZ) in comparison with full-length membrane-bound E1E2 (mbE1E2). sE1E2.LZ binds a broad panel of bnAbs to E2 and E1E2, as well as coreceptor CD81, providing evidence of assembly into a native-like heterodimer. An immunogenicity study indicated that sera of mice injected with sE1E2.LZ neutralize HCV pseudoparticles at levels comparable to sera from mice immunized with mbE1E2. This sE1E2 design is a form of the native E1E2 heterodimer that both improves upon current designs and represents a platform for structural characterization and engineering of additional HCV vaccine candidates.     

An engineered 4-1BBL fusion protein with “activity on demand”

Engineered cytokines are gaining importance in cancer therapy, but these products are often limited by toxicity, especially at early time points after intravenous administration. 4-1BB is a member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, which has been considered as a target for therapeutic strategies with agonistic antibodies or using its cognate cytokine ligand, 4-1BBL. Here we describe the engineering of an antibody fusion protein, termed F8-4-1BBL, that does not exhibit cytokine activity in solution but regains biological activity on antigen binding. F8-4-1BBL bound specifically to its cognate antigen, the alternatively spliced EDA domain of fibronectin, and selectively localized to tumors in vivo, as evidenced by quantitative biodistribution experiments. The product promoted a potent antitumor activity in various mouse models of cancer without apparent toxicity at the doses used. F8-4-1BBL represents a prototype for antibody-cytokine fusion proteins, which conditionally display “activity on demand” properties at the site of disease on antigen binding and reduce toxicity to normal tissues.

Cytokines are immunomodulatory proteins that have been considered for pharmaceutical applications in the treatment of cancer patients (1–3) and other types of disease (2). There is a growing interest in the use of engineered cytokine products as anticancer drugs, capable of boosting the action of T cells and natural killer (NK) cells against tumors (3, 4), alone or in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (3, 5–7).Recombinant cytokine products on the market include interleukin-2 (IL-2) (Proleukin) (8, 9), IL-11 (Neumega) (10, 11), tumor necrosis factor (TNF; Beromun) (12), interferon (IFN)-α (Roferon A, Intron A) (13, 14), IFN-β (Avonex, Rebif, Betaseron) (15, 16), IFN-γ (Actimmune) (17), granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (Neupogen) (18), and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (Leukine) (19, 20). The recommended dose is typically very low (often <1 mg/d) (21–23), as cytokines may exert biological activity in the subnanomolar concentration range (24). Various strategies have been proposed to develop cytokine products with improved therapeutic index. Protein PEGylation or Fc fusions may lead to prolonged circulation time in the bloodstream, allowing the administration of low doses of active payload (25, 26). In some implementations, cleavable polyethylene glycol polymers may be considered, yielding prodrugs that regain activity at later time points (27). Alternatively, tumor-homing antibody fusions have been developed, since the preferential concentration of cytokine payloads at the tumor site has been shown in preclinical models to potentiate therapeutic activity, helping spare normal tissues (28–34). Various antibody-cytokine fusions are currently being investigated in clinical trials for the treatment of cancer and of chronic inflammatory conditions (reviewed in refs. 2, 33, 35–37).Antibody-cytokine fusions display biological activity immediately after injection into patients, which may lead to unwanted toxicity and prevent escalation to therapeutically active dosage regimens (9, 22, 38). In the case of proinflammatory payloads (e.g., IL-2, IL-12, TNF-α), common side effects include hypotension, nausea, and vomiting, as well as flu-like symptoms (24, 39–42). These side effects typically disappear when the cytokine concentration drops below a critical threshold, thus providing a rationale for slow-infusion administration procedures (43). It would be highly desirable to generate antibody-cytokine fusion proteins with excellent tumor-targeting properties and with “activity on demand”— biological activity that is conditionally gained on antigen binding at the site of disease, helping spare normal tissues.Here we describe a fusion protein consisting of the F8 antibody specific to the alternatively spliced extra domain A (EDA) of fibronectin (44, 45) and of murine 4-1BBL, which did not exhibit cytokine activity in solution but could regain potent biological activity on antigen binding. The antigen (EDA+ fibronectin) is conserved from mouse to man (46), is virtually undetectable in normal adult tissues (with the exception of the placenta, endometrium, and some vessels in the ovaries), but is expressed in the majority of human malignancies (44, 45, 47, 48). 4-1BBL, a member of the TNF superfamily (49), is expressed on antigen-presenting cells (50, 51) and binds to its receptor, 4-1BB, which is up-regulated on activated cytotoxic T cells (52), activated dendritic cells (52), activated NK and NKT cells (53), and regulatory T cells (54). Signaling through 4-1BB on cytotoxic T cells protects them from activation-induced cell death and skews the cells toward a more memory-like phenotype (55, 56).We engineered nine formats of the F8-4-1BBL fusion protein, one of which exhibited superior performance in quantitative biodistribution studies and conditional gain of cytokine activity on antigen binding. The antigen-dependent reconstitution of the biological activity of the immunostimulatory payload represents an example of an antibody fusion protein with “activity on demand.” The fusion protein was potently active against different types of cancer without apparent toxicity at the doses used. The EDA of fibronectin is a particularly attractive antigen for cancer therapy in view of its high selectivity, stability, and abundant expression in most tumor types (44, 45, 47, 48).     

DLL1 orchestrates CD8+ T cells to induce long-term vascular normalization and tumor regression

The immunosuppressive and hypoxic tumor microenvironment (TME) remains a major obstacle to impede cancer immunotherapy. Here, we showed that elevated levels of Delta-like 1 (DLL1) in the breast and lung TME induced long-term tumor vascular normalization to alleviate tumor hypoxia and promoted the accumulation of interferon γ (IFN-γ)–expressing CD8⁺ T cells and the polarization of M1-like macrophages. Moreover, increased DLL1 levels in the TME sensitized anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte–associated protein 4 (anti-CTLA4) treatment in its resistant tumors, resulting in tumor regression and prolonged survival. Mechanically, in vivo depletion of CD8⁺ T cells or host IFN-γ deficiency reversed tumor growth inhibition and abrogated DLL1-induced tumor vascular normalization without affecting DLL1-mediated macrophage polarization. Together, these results demonstrate that elevated DLL1 levels in the TME promote durable tumor vascular normalization in a CD8⁺ T cell– and IFN-γ–dependent manner and potentiate anti-CTLA4 therapy. Our findings unveil DLL1 as a potential target to persistently normalize the TME to facilitate cancer immunotherapy.

One of the major challenges currently facing cancer treatments is the aberrant tumor microenvironment (TME), characterized as hypoxia, immunosuppression, acidity, and high interstitial fluid pressure (IFP) (1–5). These properties render tumors resistant to many kinds of cancer treatment modalities. High IFP prevents the penetration and distribution of drug agents into the tumor parenchyma, while hypoxia compromises the effectiveness of chemotherapy and radiotherapy because both treatment modalities often require reactive oxygen species to evoke antitumor activities (4, 6). In addition, hypoxia induces the secretion of multiple immune inhibitory factors and promotes the accumulation of immune regulatory cell populations, such as transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), interleukin 10 (IL10), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), M2-like tumor-associated macrophages (M2-TAMs), and regulatory T cells (Tregs) (1, 3, 7–9). Thus, the hypoxic and immunosuppressive TME hinders cancer immunotherapy to efficiently eradicate cancer cells.Emerging evidence suggests that the abnormal tumor vasculature contributes largely to the aberrant TME (1, 3, 4). Tumor blood vessels are tortuous, dilated, and leaky with low pericyte coverage. The resulting blood flow is often static and fluctuated and therefore creates a hypoxic and acidic TME with high IFP (4). Therefore, tumor vascular normalization has been proposed as a promising approach to alleviate the aberrances within the TME, thus enhancing the efficacy of a range of cancer treatment modalities, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy (10–18). Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) ligands and receptors constitute one of the most potent proangiogenic signaling pathways (19). Various VEGF signaling inhibitors, such as Bevacizumab and Cediranib, have been approved to treat several types of cancers. VEGF signaling inhibitors can induce tumor vascular normalization; however, the duration of the normalization is usually transient, and therefore, the improvement to the concurrent chemotherapy and immunotherapy is marginal (4, 19–21). In addition, many kinds of cancer are intrinsically resistant to VEGF signaling targeted therapy (4, 19). Thus, novel approaches are needed to induce tumor vascular normalization for longer periods and in broad tumor types.The evolutionarily conserved Notch signaling pathway plays critical roles in cell differentiation and blood vessel formation. The Notch signaling pathway consists of four Notch receptors (Notch 1 to 4) and four ligands (Jagged1, Jagged2, Delta-like 1 [DLL1], and DLL4) in murine (22). Both Notch receptors and ligands are membrane proteins. DLL1, DLL4, and Jagged1 have been shown to express in endothelial cells and play important roles in vascular development and postnatal vessel formation (23, 24). DLL1 and DLL4 are also associated with tumor angiogenesis (24–26). DLL4 is usually expressed in tumor endothelial cells but rarely in tumor cells (27, 28). Blockade of DLL4 suppresses tumor growth through the induction of nonfunctional tumor vessel formation (24, 25, 29). Thus, activation of DLL4/Notch signaling has the potential to increase tumor vascular maturation. Indeed, higher expression of DLL4 in bladder tumor endothelial cells was correlated with vessel maturation (30). Unfortunately, long-term DLL4 blockade led to vascular neoplasms, and persistent activation of DLL4/Notch signaling promoted T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) (31–33).Because of these potential safety concerns of chronic blockade or activation of DLL4/Notch signaling, we proposed instead to remodel tumor vessels via the activation of DLL1/Notch signaling. In contrast to the extensive attention of DLL4 in tumor angiogenesis, the roles of DLL1 in tumor vessel formation is largely unknown. Here, we showed that overexpression of DLL1 in EO771 breast and LAP0297 lung tumor cells not only induced durable tumor vascular normalization but also stimulated CD8⁺ T cell activities. Interestingly, in vivo depletion of CD8⁺ T cells prior to tumor implantation or host IFN-γ deficiency abrogated the effects of DLL1 overexpression on tumor vessels, suggesting that selective activation of DLL1/Notch signaling induces long-term tumor vascular normalization via T cell activation. Moreover, DLL1/Notch signaling activation in combination with anti-CTLA4 therapy prolonged survival. Thus, this study uncovered DLL1 as a potential target to induce long-term tumor vascular normalization to enhance cancer immunotherapy.     

Butyrate enhances CPT1A activity to promote fatty acid oxidation and iTreg differentiation

Inducible regulatory T (iTreg) cells play a crucial role in immune suppression and are important for the maintenance of immune homeostasis. Mounting evidence has demonstrated connections between iTreg differentiation and metabolic reprogramming, especially rewiring in fatty acid oxidation (FAO). Previous work showed that butyrate, a specific type of short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) readily produced from fiber-rich diets through microbial fermentation, was critical for the maintenance of intestinal homeostasis and capable of promoting iTreg generation by up-regulating histone acetylation for gene expression as an HDAC inhibitor. Here, we revealed that butyrate could also accelerate FAO to facilitate iTreg differentiation. Moreover, butyrate was converted, by acyl-CoA synthetase short-chain family member 2 (ACSS2), into butyryl-CoA (BCoA), which up-regulated CPT1A activity through antagonizing the association of malonyl-CoA (MCoA), the best known metabolic intermediate inhibiting CPT1A, to promote FAO and thereby iTreg differentiation. Mutation of CPT1A at Arg243, a reported amino acid required for MCoA association, impaired both MCoA and BCoA binding, indicating that Arg243 is probably the responsible site for MCoA and BCoA association. Furthermore, blocking BCoA formation by ACSS2 inhibitor compromised butyrate-mediated iTreg generation and mitigation of mouse colitis. Together, we unveil a previously unappreciated role for butyrate in iTreg differentiation and illustrate butyrate–BCoA–CPT1A axis for the regulation of immune homeostasis.

Regulatory T (Treg) cells are CD4⁺ T cells expressing Foxp3 that play a key role in immune suppression (1–3). They can be divided into natural Treg (nTreg) and inducible Treg (iTreg) cells (1–3). nTreg cells, which are often referred to as thymic Treg (tTreg), arise during CD4⁺ T cell differentiation in the thymus under the influence of relatively high-avidity interactions of the T cell receptor (TCR) with self-antigens (1–3). iTreg cells, also called peripherally induced Treg (pTreg), develop in secondary lymphoid tissues. In the presence of TGFβ1, naive CD4⁺ T are induced into iTreg cells upon TCR ligation and costimulation by antigen-presenting cells (APCs) in response to non-self antigens, such as allergens, food, and the commensal microbiota (1–3).It has been demonstrated that iTreg cells are enriched in gut-associated lymphoid tissues (GALTs) and are important for the maintenance of intestinal immune homeostasis (3–5). Intestinal iTreg cells were found to be important for the regulation of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), such as Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), which can potentially affect any portion of the gastrointestinal tract and induce many further complications such as tissue fibrosis, stenosis, fistulas, and colon cancer over time (6). Enhancement of intestinal iTreg function or adoptive transfer of iTreg could significantly alleviate IBDs in mice (7–9).Different types of T cells are featured by distinct metabolic characteristics. Unlike effector CD4⁺ T cells (Teffs), including Th1, Th2, Th9, and Th17 cells, that are mainly reliant on aerobic glycolysis, iTreg cells largely rely on fatty acid oxidation (FAO) (10–12). Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that T cell differentiation is always coupled with metabolic reprogramming (13, 14). For instance, FAO needs to be established in the process of iTreg differentiation. Up-regulation of FAO improved iTreg generation, whereas impairment in FAO compromised iTreg differentiation (12, 13, 15, 16).FAO, comprised of a cyclical series of reactions, demands different fatty acids (FAs), which can be divided into long-, medium-, and short-chain fatty acids (LCFAs, SCFAs, and MCFAs). It dominantly occurs in mitochondria and results in acetyl-CoA (AcCoA), which could be consumed in tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle. For the oxidation of LCFA, it initiates from LCFA activation in cytoplasm, resulting in long-chain acyl-CoA. Subsequently, these resulting molecules are converted into long-chain acyl-carnitine by carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1 (CPT1), which is anchored on the mitochondrial outer membrane. Following its shuttling into mitochondria, long-chain acyl-carnitine experiences a chain of reactions to support FAO. Apparently, the transportation of LCFA from cytoplasm into mitochondria is a prerequisite for FAO. CPT1, the rate-limiting enzyme controlling this key step, is thus recognized as a determinant for FAO. In contrast, SCFAs and MCFAs can diffuse across mitochondrial membrane and drive FAO in a CPT1-independent manner (17). Nevertheless, extensive investigations have suggested an important role for CPT1 in iTreg differentiation (12, 13, 15, 16).In recent years, butyrate, a specific type of SCFA produced from fiber-rich diets through microbial fermentation, was shown to play a critical role in the maintenance of intestinal homeostasis and was therefore recognized as an effective ingredient from food (18–24). By modulating distinct types of immune cells, including dendritic cells (18, 19), macrophages (20), and B and T cells (21–24), butyrate contributes to the orchestration of the delicate balance in intestinal immune system. Elegant investigations have elucidated that butyrate is able to facilitate iTreg differentiation by up-regulating Foxp3 expression as a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor (22, 23). Meanwhile, butyrate, as metabolic fuel and energy source, could also support FAO in colonic epithelial cells (25). However, whether butyrate could regulate FAO to promote iTreg differentiation is unclear.In this study, we found that increased FAO contributed to enhanced iTreg cell differentiation in response to butyrate. Butyrate was processed, by acyl-CoA synthetase short-chain family member 2 (ACSS2), into butyryl-CoA (BCoA), which played a critical role in the control of FAO by targeting CPT1A. We found that BCoA competed with malonyl-CoA (MCoA), the best-known metabolic intermediate inhibiting CPT1A, to unleash CPT1A activity for FAO and thereby iTreg differentiation. Inhibition of ACSS2 to block BCoA generation compromised butyrate-mediated iTreg generation as well as mitigation of mouse colitis. Collectively, we depicted a previously unappreciated mechanism, namely, the butyrate–BCoA–CPT1A regulatory axis, for iTreg differentiation.     

The high-affinity immunoglobulin receptor FcγRI potentiates HIV-1 neutralization via antibodies against the gp41 N-heptad repeat

The HIV-1 gp41 N-heptad repeat (NHR) region of the prehairpin intermediate, which is transiently exposed during HIV-1 viral membrane fusion, is a validated clinical target in humans and is inhibited by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drug enfuvirtide. However, vaccine candidates targeting the NHR have yielded only modest neutralization activities in animals; this inhibition has been largely restricted to tier-1 viruses, which are most sensitive to neutralization by sera from HIV-1–infected individuals. Here, we show that the neutralization activity of the well-characterized NHR-targeting antibody D5 is potentiated >5,000-fold in TZM-bl cells expressing FcγRI compared with those without, resulting in neutralization of many tier-2 viruses (which are less susceptible to neutralization by sera from HIV-1–infected individuals and are the target of current antibody-based vaccine efforts). Further, antisera from guinea pigs immunized with the NHR-based vaccine candidate (ccIZN36)₃ neutralized tier-2 viruses from multiple clades in an FcγRI-dependent manner. As FcγRI is expressed on macrophages and dendritic cells, which are present at mucosal surfaces and are implicated in the early establishment of HIV-1 infection following sexual transmission, these results may be important in the development of a prophylactic HIV-1 vaccine.

Membrane fusion between HIV-1 and host cells is mediated by the viral envelope glycoprotein (Env), a trimer consisting of the gp120 and gp41 subunits. Upon interaction with cellular receptors, Env undergoes a dramatic conformational change and forms the prehairpin intermediate (PHI) (1–3), in which the fusion peptide region at the amino terminus of gp41 inserts into the cell membrane. In the PHI, the N-heptad repeat (NHR) region of gp41 is exposed and forms a stable, three-stranded α-helical coiled coil. Subsequently, the PHI resolves when the NHR and the C-heptad repeat (CHR) regions of gp41 associate to form a trimer-of-hairpins structure that brings the viral and cell membranes into proximity, facilitating membrane fusion (Fig. 1).Open in a separate windowFig. 1.HIV-1 membrane fusion. The surface protein of the HIV-1 envelope is composed of the gp120 and gp41 subunits. After Env binds to cell-surface receptors, gp41 inserts into the host cell membrane and undergoes a conformational change to form the prehairpin intermediate. The N-heptad repeat (orange) region of gp41 is exposed in the PHI and forms a three-stranded coiled coil. To complete viral fusion, the PHI resolves to a trimer-of-hairpins structure in which the C-heptad repeat (blue) adopts a helical conformation and binds the NHR region. Fusion inhibitors such as enfuvirtide bind the NHR, preventing viral fusion by inhibiting formation of the trimer of hairpins (1–3). The membrane-proximal external region (red) is located adjacent to the transmembrane (TM) region of gp41.The NHR region of the PHI is a validated therapeutic target in humans: the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drug enfuvirtide binds the NHR and inhibits viral entry into cells (4, 5). Various versions of the three-stranded coiled coil formed by the NHR have been created and used as vaccine candidates in animals (6–10). The neutralization potencies of these antisera, as well as those of anti-NHR monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) (11–15), are modest and mostly limited to HIV-1 isolates that are highly sensitive to antibody-mediated neutralization [commonly referred to as tier-1 viruses (16)]. These results have led to skepticism about the PHI as a vaccine target.Earlier studies showed that the neutralization activities of mAbs that bound another region of gp41, the membrane-proximal external region (MPER) (Fig. 1), were enhanced as much as 5,000-fold in cells expressing FcγRI (CD64) (17, 18), an integral membrane protein that binds the Fc portion of immunoglobulin G (IgG) molecules with high (nanomolar) affinity (19, 20). This effect was not attributed to phagocytosis and occurred when the cells were preincubated with antibody and washed before adding virus (17, 18). Since the MPER is a partially cryptic epitope that is not fully exposed until after Env engages with cellular receptors (21, 22), these results suggest that by binding the Fc region, FcγRI provides a local concentration advantage for MPER mAbs at the cell surface that enhances viral neutralization (17, 18). While not expressed on T cells, FcγRI is expressed on macrophages and dendritic cells (23), which are present at mucosal surfaces and are implicated in sexual HIV-1 transmission and the early establishment of HIV-1 infection (22–34).Here we investigated whether FcγRI expression also potentiates the neutralizing activity of antibodies targeting the NHR, since that region, like the MPER, is preferentially exposed during viral fusion. We found that D5, a well-characterized anti-NHR mAb (11, 12), inhibits HIV-1 infection ∼5,000-fold more potently in TZM-bl cells expressing FcγRI (TZM-bl/FcγRI cells) than in TZM-bl cells that do not. Further, while antisera from guinea pigs immunized with (ccIZN36)₃, an NHR-based vaccine candidate (7), displayed weak neutralizing activity in TZM-bl cells, they exhibited enhanced neutralization in TZM-bl/FcγRI cells, including against some tier-2 HIV-1 isolates that are more resistant to antibody-mediated neutralization (16) and that serve as benchmarks for antibody-based vaccine efforts. These results indicate that FcγRI can play an important role in neutralization by antibodies that target the PHI. Since these receptors are expressed on cells prevalent at mucosal surfaces thought to be important for sexual HIV-1 transmission, our results motivate vaccine strategies that harness this potentiating effect.     

Neuromodulator release in neurons requires two functionally redundant calcium sensors

Neuropeptides and neurotrophic factors secreted from dense core vesicles (DCVs) control many brain functions, but the calcium sensors that trigger their secretion remain unknown. Here, we show that in mouse hippocampal neurons, DCV fusion is strongly and equally reduced in synaptotagmin-1 (Syt1)- or Syt7-deficient neurons, but combined Syt1/Syt7 deficiency did not reduce fusion further. Cross-rescue, expression of Syt1 in Syt7-deficient neurons, or vice versa, completely restored fusion. Hence, both sensors are rate limiting, operating in a single pathway. Overexpression of either sensor in wild-type neurons confirmed this and increased fusion. Syt1 traveled with DCVs and was present on fusing DCVs, but Syt7 supported fusion largely from other locations. Finally, the duration of single DCV fusion events was reduced in Syt1-deficient but not Syt7-deficient neurons. In conclusion, two functionally redundant calcium sensors drive neuromodulator secretion in an expression-dependent manner. In addition, Syt1 has a unique role in regulating fusion pore duration.

To date, over 100 genes encoding neuropeptides and neurotrophic factors, together referred to as neuromodulators, are identified, and most neurons express neuromodulators and neuromodulator receptors (1). Neuromodulators travel through neurons in dense core vesicles (DCVs) and, upon secretion, regulate neuronal excitability, synaptic plasticity, and neurite outgrowth (2–4). Dysregulation of DCV secretion is linked to many brain disorders (5–7). However, the molecular mechanisms that regulate neuromodulator secretion remain largely elusive.Neuromodulator secretion, like neurotransmitter secretion from synaptic vesicles (SVs), is tightly controlled by Ca²⁺. The Ca²⁺ sensors that regulate secretion have been described for other secretory pathways but not for DCV exocytosis in neurons. Synaptotagmin (Syt) and Doc2a/b are good candidate sensors due to their interaction with SNARE complexes, phospholipids, and Ca²⁺ (8–11). The Syt family consists of 17 paralogs (12, 13). Eight show Ca²⁺-dependent lipid binding: Syt1 to 3, Syt5 to 7, and Syt9 and 10 (14, 15). Syt1 mediates synchronous SV fusion (8), consistent with its low Ca²⁺-dependent lipid affinity (15, 16) and fast Ca²⁺/membrane dissociation kinetics (16, 17). Syt1 is also required for the fast fusion in chromaffin cells (18) and fast striatal dopamine release (19). Synaptotagmin-7 (Syt7), in contrast, drives asynchronous SV fusion (20), in line with its a higher Ca²⁺ affinity (15) and slower dissociation kinetics (16). Syt7 is also a major calcium sensor for neuroendocrine secretion (21) and secretion in pancreatic cells (22–24). Other sensors include Syt4, which negatively regulates brain-derived neurothropic factor (25) and oxytocin release (26), in line with its Ca²⁺ independency. Syt9 regulates hormone secretion in the anterior pituitary (27) and, together with Syt1, secretion from PC12 cells (28, 29). Syt10 controls growth factor secretion (30). However, Syt9 and Syt10 expression is highly restricted in the brain (31–33). Hence, the calcium sensors for neuronal DCV fusion remain largely elusive. Because DCVs are generally not located close to Ca²⁺ channels (34), we hypothesized that DCV fusion is triggered by high-affinity Ca²⁺ sensors. Because of their important roles in vesicle secretion, their Ca²⁺ binding ability, and their high expression levels in the brain (20, 31, 35–38), we addressed the roles of Doc2a/b, Syt1, and Syt7 in neuronal DCV fusion.In this study, we used primary Doc2a/b-, Syt1-, and Syt7-null (knockout, KO) neurons expressing DCV fusion reporters (34, 39–41) with single-vesicle resolution. We show that both Syt1 and Syt7, but not Doc2a/b, are required for ∼60 to 90% of DCV fusion events. Deficiency of both Syt1 and Syt7 did not produce an additive effect, suggesting they function in the same pathway. Syt1 overexpression (Syt1-OE) rescued DCV fusion in Syt7-null neurons, and vice versa, indicating that the two proteins compensate for each other in DCV secretion. Moreover, overexpression of Syt1 or Syt7 in wild-type (WT) neurons increased DCV fusion, suggesting they are both rate limiting for DCV secretion. We conclude that DCV fusion requires two calcium sensors, Syt1 and Syt7, that act in a single/serial pathway and that both sensors regulate fusion in a rate-limiting and dose-dependent manner.     

T-cell responses to hybrid insulin peptides prior to type 1 diabetes development

T-cell responses to posttranslationally modified self-antigens are associated with many autoimmune disorders. In type 1 diabetes, hybrid insulin peptides (HIPs) are implicated in the T-cell–mediated destruction of insulin-producing β-cells within pancreatic islets. The natural history of the disease is such that it allows for the study of T-cell reactivity prior to the onset of clinical symptoms. We hypothesized that CD4 T-cell responses to posttranslationally modified islet peptides precedes diabetes onset. In a cohort of genetically at-risk individuals, we measured longitudinal T-cell responses to native insulin and hybrid insulin peptides. Both proinflammatory (interferon-γ) and antiinflammatory (interluekin-10) cytokine responses to HIPs were more robust than those to native peptides, and the ratio of such responses oscillated between pro- and antiinflammatory over time. However, individuals who developed islet autoantibodies or progressed to clinical type 1 diabetes had predominantly inflammatory T-cell responses to HIPs. Additionally, several HIP T-cell responses correlated to worsening measurements of blood glucose, highlighting the relevance of T-cell responses to posttranslationally modified peptides prior to autoimmune disease development.

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a prototypical organ-specific autoimmune disease that develops in stages (1, 2). The stages are marked by the presence of islet autoantibodies directed against insulin and other β-cell proteins, followed by impaired glucose tolerance, and finally clinical diabetes marked by hyperglycemia and the need for insulin treatment (3). The T1D disease course provides a defined preclinical period and the ability to measure immune responses prior to clinical symptoms.Self-reactive T cells target pancreatic β-cells in both murine models of spontaneous autoimmune diabetes and human T1D (4), with a number of antigens implicated as T-cell epitopes (5, 6). Recently, posttranslationally modified (PTM) epitopes have been characterized as novel autoantigens that may lead to a break in tolerance, thus resulting in T-cell–mediated immunity to pancreatic islets. PTM of antigens is well-described in autoimmune diseases, such as celiac disease (gluten sensitivity), in which tissue transglutaminase mediates deamidation of glutamine to glutamic acid within gliadin to create immunogenic CD4 T-cell epitopes (7–10). In rheumatoid arthritis, citrullinated peptides form epitopes from cartilage proteins that both elicit antibody responses and activate CD4 T cells (11). Similarly, a novel class of epitopes within T1D are hybrid insulin peptides (HIPs) that are formed within lysozymes of β-cells through a covalent bond between an insulin peptide fragment and another β-cell peptide, thereby generating a neo-epitope (12, 13).Recent studies provide strong evidence for the role of HIPs in the development of diabetes in the nonobese diabetic (NOD) mouse model of spontaneous autoimmune diabetes (12, 14–16). Notably, the antigen for the well-studied “diabetogenic” BDC2.5 T-cell clone and transgenic mouse model is a HIP formed between a peptide fusion of C-peptide and a cleavage product of chromogranin A, termed WE14 (12, 17, 18). C-peptide is cleaved from the A and B chains of insulin prior to secretion from the β-cell. In the NOD mouse, HIP-reactive CD4 T cells have a proinflammatory phenotype, can be detected prior to the onset of diabetes, and their frequency increases as the disease progresses (15). Another CD4 T-cell epitope critical for NOD diabetes development is a fragment of the insulin B chain, consisting of amino acids 9 to 23 (B:9–23) (19–21). A strongly stimulating T-cell epitope is very likely a HIP consisting of a fragment of this insulin B-chain peptide with a portion of C-peptide fused to the C-terminal end (22). HIP-reactive CD4 T cells have also been studied in the context of human T1D, with multiple CD4 T-cell clones and lines grown from the residual pancreatic islets of T1D organ donors subsequently responding to these neo-epitopes (12, 23, 24). A number of HIP-reactive T cells have also been measured from the peripheral blood in newly diagnosed T1D patients (25–30); however, the timing of when these T cells appear in the disease course and whether these responses directed at PTM peptides precede those toward native antigens remains to be addressed. We hypothesized that HIP T-cell responses precede clinical diabetes development and are more robust than responses to native insulin peptides.In this study, we longitudinally collected peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from genetically at-risk individuals and measured reactivity to a panel of HIPs and native antigens using sensitive enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assays, which have previously been used to identify CD4 T-cell responses in T1D (31). We show that PBMCs respond to native insulin peptides, but the cells respond more robustly to specific HIPs, including the insulin B chain B:9–23 HIP (B22E) and two C-peptide–derived HIPs (C-peptide/islet amyloid polypeptide-2 [C:IAPP-2] and C:A chain). We demonstrate that T-cell responses fluctuate between pro- and antiinflammatory during the preclinical phase prior to T1D development. Interestingly, individuals who progressed to clinical disease or who seroconverted to islet autoantibody positivity during the course of the study had a distinct polarization toward proinflammatory responses to specific HIPs. Remarkably, the T-cell response to the C:IAPP-2 HIP correlated with worsening measures of blood glucose. Overall, the data support a pathogenic role for PTM epitopes in the preclinical stage of T1D, and the fluctuating nature of the T-cell responses has implications for timing therapies to prevent T1D and potentially other autoimmune disorders.     

Oncogenic KRAS engages an RSK1/NF1 pathway to inhibit wild-type RAS signaling in pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a lethal malignancy with limited treatment options. Although activating mutations of the KRAS GTPase are the predominant dependency present in >90% of PDAC patients, targeting KRAS mutants directly has been challenging in PDAC. Similarly, strategies targeting known KRAS downstream effectors have had limited clinical success due to feedback mechanisms, alternate pathways, and dose-limiting toxicities in normal tissues. Therefore, identifying additional functionally relevant KRAS interactions in PDAC may allow for a better understanding of feedback mechanisms and unveil potential therapeutic targets. Here, we used proximity labeling to identify protein interactors of active KRAS in PDAC cells. We expressed fusions of wild-type (WT) (BirA-KRAS4B), mutant (BirA-KRAS4B^G12D), and nontransforming cytosolic double mutant (BirA-KRAS4B^G12D/C185S) KRAS with the BirA biotin ligase in murine PDAC cells. Mass spectrometry analysis revealed that RSK1 selectively interacts with membrane-bound KRAS^G12D, and we demonstrate that this interaction requires NF1 and SPRED2. We find that membrane RSK1 mediates negative feedback on WT RAS signaling and impedes the proliferation of pancreatic cancer cells upon the ablation of mutant KRAS. Our findings link NF1 to the membrane-localized functions of RSK1 and highlight a role for WT RAS signaling in promoting adaptive resistance to mutant KRAS-specific inhibitors in PDAC.

A total of 60,430 new cases of pancreatic cancer were estimated for 2021, and the 5-y relative survival rate has consistently remained below 11% (1). About 85% of these pancreatic cancer tumors are pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) (2). Poor outcomes of PDAC cases result from late diagnoses leading to unresectable and heterogeneous tumors as well as ineffective therapies, which only prolong survival on the order of months (3–5). Mutations in the KRAS proto-oncogene are present in over 90% of PDAC cases and are associated with a poor prognosis (6). Furthermore, mice expressing mutant KRAS in the pancreas develop precursor lesions, which sporadically progress into frank PDAC. This progression is accelerated when combined with other mutations or deletion of tumor suppressor genes (7–11). Additionally, independent studies have shown that the maintenance of murine PDAC cells require KRAS (12–14).As a RAS GTPase, KRAS acts as a molecular switch at the plasma membrane that relays growth factor signaling from receptor tyrosine kinases to downstream pathways such as RAF/MEK and PI3K/AKT (15). GTP binding alters the conformation of the KRAS G domain, thereby creating binding sites for downstream effectors to trigger enzymatic cascades that promote cell transformation (16–19). Intrinsically, KRAS slowly hydrolyzes GTP into GDP to halt signaling; however, GTPase activating proteins (GAPs) such as neurofibromin 1(NF1) catalyze this process (20). In contrast, guanine nucleotide exchange factors, such as son of sevenless homolog 1 (SOS1), catalyze the exchange of GTP for bound GDP. In most PDAC cases, KRAS is mutated at the 12th residue located in the G domain from glycine to either a valine (G12V), or more commonly, aspartate (G12D). These mutations sterically prevent the “arginine finger domain” of GAPs from entering the GTPase site, thereby blocking extrinsic allosteric GTPase activation and stabilizing RAS-GTP (21, 22). Activating mutations in KRAS constitutively trigger RAF/MEK and PI3K/AKT pathways leading to increased cell proliferation as well as other prooncogenic behaviors (15). KRAS signaling not only relies on the G domain but also the C-terminal hypervariable domain (HVR), which is required to stabilize KRAS on membranes where signaling is most efficient (23–26). Independent studies suggest that specific biochemical and cellular consequences of KRAS activation are attributed to the unique properties of the HVR of the predominant splice form KRAS4B, namely the polybasic domain and the lipid anchor (27–30). Localization of RAS proteins to the plasma membrane requires the prenylation of the CAAX motif (23). Additionally, for KRAS4B, the hypervariable region contains a highly polybasic domain consisting of several consecutive lysines, which can interact with the negative charges on the polar heads of phospholipids and stabilize protein interactions (31). Structural and biochemical characterization of the HVR and G domain has contributed to a better understanding of the signaling outputs of KRAS and led to KRAS-targeting strategies.Various approaches to inhibit KRAS include direct inhibition, expression interference, mislocalization, and targeting of downstream effectors (32). Thus far, direct inhibitors against KRAS have only successfully targeted the G12C mutant, which comprises 2.9% of KRAS mutant PDAC (21, 33). For other KRAS mutants, targeting downstream effectors of KRAS in pancreatic cancer remains an alternative approach. Unfortunately, dual inhibition of MEK and AKT pathways was ineffective in PDAC patients (34). Difficulty in targeting KRAS due to adaptive resistance and feedback regulation motivates a better understanding of KRAS biology (35). For example, although PDAC typically features a mutant KRAS, there may be a role for its wild-type (WT) counterpart as well as WT RAS paralogs (HRAS and NRAS), which are GAP sensitive and subject to signaling feedback. While oncogenic KRAS has been shown to activate WT HRAS and NRAS via allosteric stimulation of SOS1 (36), WT KRAS has been proposed to be a tumor suppressor in some KRAS mutant cancers based on the commonly observed mutant-specific allele imbalance that occurs throughout tumor progression (37). Additionally, the reintroduction of WT KRAS abolished tumor T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia development and impaired tumor growth in KRAS mutant lung cancer cells in vivo (37–39). The discovery of novel KRAS protein interactors involved in downstream signaling or feedback and compensatory pathways may elucidate why inhibition of downstream pathways have had limited clinical impact in PDAC. Here, we perform proximity labeling experiments by expressing a fusion of BirA^R118G biotin ligase and KRAS in PDAC cells, which, in the presence of high concentrations of biotin, generates reactive biotinoyl-AMP that labels lysines of nearby proteins, such as interactors of its fusion partner KRAS (40–42). The biotinylated interactor proteins can be isolated by streptavidin pulldown and analyzed by proteomics to identify novel protein interactors (43–45). Because covalent labeling occurs in living cells, enzymatic labeling may potentially identify transient interactors and protein complexes.Two recent studies used proximity-dependent biotin identification (BioID) labeling methods to identify KRAS interactors in 293T and colon cancer cells (46, 47). These studies uncovered and validated the functional relevance of PIP5KA1 and mTORC2 in PDAC cells. However, BirA-KRAS screens in PDAC models have not yet been performed. Since the tumor context may determine protein expression and relevant interactions, we sought to perform a BirA-KRAS screen in PDAC cells. We hypothesize that proximity labeling with BioID presents a means for identifying new mutant KRAS-specific interactions in PDAC, which may unveil new insights into therapeutic design for this malignancy.     

A conserved Ctp1/CtIP C-terminal peptide stimulates Mre11 endonuclease activity

The Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex (MRN) is important for repairing DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) by homologous recombination (HR). The endonuclease activity of MRN is critical for resecting 5′-ended DNA strands at DSB ends, producing 3′-ended single-strand DNA, a prerequisite for HR. This endonuclease activity is stimulated by Ctp1, the Schizosaccharomyces pombe homolog of human CtIP. Here, with purified proteins, we show that Ctp1 phosphorylation stimulates MRN endonuclease activity by inducing the association of Ctp1 with Nbs1. The highly conserved extreme C terminus of Ctp1 is indispensable for MRN activation. Importantly, a polypeptide composed of the conserved 15 amino acids at the C terminus of Ctp1 (CT15) is sufficient to stimulate Mre11 endonuclease activity. Furthermore, the CT15 equivalent from CtIP can stimulate human MRE11 endonuclease activity, arguing for the generality of this stimulatory mechanism. Thus, we propose that Nbs1-mediated recruitment of CT15 plays a pivotal role in the activation of the Mre11 endonuclease by Ctp1/CtIP.

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are potentially lethal lesions that threaten genomic integrity and cell viability. DSBs can occur spontaneously as a result of faulty DNA metabolism or by exposure to genotoxins. In eukaryotes, these DSBs have “dirty ends” that lack ligatable 3ʹ-hydroxyl/5ʹ-phosphate groups and are often firmly attached to proteins such as the Ku70-80 heterodimer and topoisomerases (1, 2). During meiosis, the topoisomerase-like Spo11 protein generates DSBs and remains covalently attached to the 5ʹ DNA ends (3). To enable further processing, these DSB ends must be converted to “clean” ends with 3ʹ-hydroxyl/5ʹ-phosphate groups properly exposed. This step is achieved by endonucleolytic cleavage, or clipping, by Mre11 (4–7).In mammals, the MRE11, RAD50, and NBS1 complex (Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 [MRN]), together with CtIP, is involved in the clipping reaction. MRE11 is the nuclease subunit that has both endonuclease and 3′-to-5′ exonuclease activities, but only the former is essential for clipping (4, 8–12). RAD50, a member of the Structural Maintenance of Chromosomes protein family, binds to MRE11 to form an (MRE11)₂-(RAD50)₂ ring structure (MR complex) (13–15). NBS1 binds to the MR complex via MRE11 to form the MRN complex (16). Homologs of CtIP include Ctp1 in Schizosaccharomyces pombe and Sae2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (17–19). Upon phosphorylation, these proteins physically interact with their cognate MRN complex via the N-terminal forkhead-associated domain of NBS1, leading to activation of the MRE11 endonucleolytic clipping activity (20–24). However, the mechanistic details underlying this activation have not yet been determined.Through biochemical reconstitution using fission yeast proteins, we made three key findings regarding how Ctp1 activates MRN. First, MRN activation is mediated by Ctp1 phosphorylation, which promotes the direct association of Ctp1 with the Nbs1 subunit of MRN. Second, the highly conserved extreme C terminus of Ctp1 retains the ability to promote the endonuclease activity of MRN. Strikingly, a synthetic polypeptide comprising the 15 amino acids from the extreme C terminus of Ctp1 was sufficient for the full activation of MRN. Third, we verified the evolutionary significance of these findings by demonstrating that the conserved C-terminal polypeptide of CtIP can also stimulate the endonuclease activity of human MRN. Together, our results strongly suggest that the Ctp1-promoted MRN activation mechanism consists of at least two fundamentally separable elements: phosphorylation-induced Ctp1-MRN association and activation of MRN by the C-terminal peptide of Ctp1. Thus, recruitment of the Ctp1 C terminus to MRN is likely pivotal in this activation mechanism.