The role of low density lipoprotein apheresis in the treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia.

The chief indication for low density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis is the treatment of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), a potentially fatal condition that responds poorly to conventional therapy. Dextran sulfate/cellulose adsorption columns (Kaneka) and on-line heparin precipitation (HELP) are the most popular systems used in LDL apheresis. Weekly or biweekly procedures plus concomitant drug therapy enable LDL cholesterol to be maintained at 30-50% of its untreated level, with regression of xanthomas, arrest of progression of coronary atherosclerosis, and improved life expectancy. However, aortic stenosis may progress despite apheresis and necessitate valve replacement. Better control of hypercholesterolemia results from combining apheresis with a new 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, atorvastatin. LDL apheresis can also be useful in treating drug-resistant FH heterozygotes with coronary disease. However, the FH Regression Study showed no evidence that reduction by apheresis of both LDL and lipoprotein(a), was more advantageous than reduction by combination drug therapy of LDL alone.     

Apheresis technology for prevention and regression of atherosclerosis: an overview.

Low density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis is at present one method of treatment in homozygous cases of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). It is also effective in the prevention of the development of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with heterozygous FH and other types of mild hypercholesterolemia, leading to the regression of the stenosing lesions. In this paper, an overview is presented on the development of the devices for LDL apheresis and its short- and long-term effects on FH mainly based upon experience with the Liposorber system. LDL apheresis has served to protect the lives of patients from life threatening diseases like myocardial infarction although observations for more than 10 years in some laboratories have shown that the progression of atherosclerosis has taken place in many patients, and more importantly, the involvement of the aortic valve with calcification has developed, especially in patients who had homozygous FH, making this the most obstinate complication of FH. Therefore, more aggressive treatment or the combination of LDL apheresis with other therapies is required in the future. LDL apheresis has also been approved for the treatment of glomerulosclerosis and arteriosclerosis obliterans.     

Low-density lipoprotein apheresis for the treatment of refractory hyperlipidemia

The advent of treatment with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A inhibitors has meant that, with a combination of diet and drug therapy, adequate control of serum cholesterol concentrations can be achieved in most patients with hypercholesterolemia. However, some patients, primarily those with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), may require additional therapy to lower their cholesterol levels. In recent years, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis has emerged as an effective method of treatment in these patients. The criteria for commencement of LDL apheresis are LDL cholesterol levels of 500 mg/dL or higher for homozygous FH patients, 300 mg/dL or higher for heterozygous FH patients in whom medical therapy has failed, and 200 mg/dL or higher for heterozygous FH patients with documented coronary disease and in whom medical therapy has failed. In addition to cholesterol lowering in patients with FH, other indications for LDL apheresis are emerging. These include its use in the treatment of graft vascular disease in patients receiving cardiac transplants as well as in the treatment of certain glomerulonephritides. This review examines the role of LDL apheresis in the management of lipid disorders and the evidence available to support its use in clinical practice.     

Beneficial effect of aggressive low-density lipoprotein apheresis in a familial hypercholesterolemic patient with severe diabetic scleredema.

We present a 59-year-old woman with severe diabetic scleredema (DS) associated with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). She had been treated with drugs to lower blood glucose, with insulin for diabetes mellitus (DM), and with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis therapy monthly or every 2 weeks in addition to drugs to lower serum lipids for FH. However, her scleredema had not improved. After we had tried weekly LDL apheresis therapy for a period of 3 years to treat her hyperlipidemia, the levels of her serum lipids were reduced to normal ranges, and scleredema in her nape improved. We also demonstrated the histopathological improvement in dermis of her cervical skin. We conclude that weekly LDL apheresis therapy is effective for diabetic scleredema that is resistant to conventional treatments.     

Lipoprotein apheresis affects lipoprotein particle subclasses more efficiently compared to the PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab,a pilot study

Lipoprotein apheresis and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors are last therapeutic resorts in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). We explored changes in lipoprotein subclasses and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) function when changing treatment from lipoprotein apheresis to PCSK9 inhibition.We measured the levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and HDL particle subclasses, serum amyloid A1 (SAA1), paraoxonase-1 (PON1) activity and cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC) in three heterozygous FH patients. Concentrations of all LDL particle subclasses were reduced during apheresis (large 68.0?±?17.5 to 16.3?±?2.1?mg/dL, (p?=?0.03), intermediate 38.3?±?0.6 to 5.0?±?3.5?mg/dL (p?=?0.004) and small 5.0?±?2.6 to 0.2?±?0.1?mg/dL (p?=?0.08)). There were non-significant reductions in the LDL subclasses during evolocumab treatment. There were non-significant reductions in subclasses of HDL particles during apheresis, and no changes during evolocumab treatment. CEC was unchanged throughout the study, while the SAA1/PON1 ratio was unchanged during apheresis but decreased during evolocumab treatment.In conclusion, there were significant reductions in large and intermediate size LDL particles during apheresis, and a non-significant reduction in small LDL particles. There were only non-significant reductions in the LDL subclasses during evolocumab treatment.     

LDL apheresis in Japan

LDL apheresis has been developed as the treatment for refractory familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). Currently, plasma exchange, double membrane filtration, and selective LDL adsorption are available in Japan, and selective LDL adsorption is most common method. LDL apheresis can prevent atherosclerosis progression even in homozygous (HoFH). However, in our observational study, HoFH who started LDL apheresis from adulthood had poor prognosis compared with patients who started from childhood. Therefore, as far as possible, HoFH patients need to start LDL apheresis from childhood. Although indication of LDL apheresis in heterozygous FH (HeFH) has been decreasing with the advent of strong statin, our observational study showed that HeFH patients who were discontinued LDL apheresis therapy had poor prognosis compared with patients who were continued apheresis therapy. These results suggest that high risk HeFH need to be treated by LDL apheresis even if their LDLC is controlled by lipid-lowering agents. However, by launching new class of lipid lowering agents, that is, PCSK-9 antibody and MTP inhibitor, indication of LDL-apheresis in FH may be changed near the future. LDL-apheresis can provide symptom relief of peripheral artery disease (PAD). Therefore, PAD patients who have insufficient effect by other therapeutic approach including revascularization are also treated by LDL apheresis. Thus, LDL apheresis is still one of good therapeutic options for severe atherosclerotic diseases in Japan.     

Effects of low-density lipoprotein apheresis on coronary and carotid atherosclerosis and diabetic scleredema in patients with severe hypercholesterolemia.

Correlations between serum cholesterol levels and progression of coronary and peripheral atherosclerosis have been found in many recent studies. It has also been demonstrated that aggressive cholesterol-lowering therapy with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis, a method of LDL elimination by extracorporeal circulation, is effective not only for coronary artery disease, but also for systemic circulatory disturbance in severe hypercholesterolemic patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) in particular. We found that LDL apheresis treatment with medical therapy improved coronary atherosclerotic lesions, based on coronary angiography evaluation and histopathological observation, suppressed progression of early carotid atherosclerotic lesions on annual B-mode ultrasonography, and improved diabetic scleredema in FH patients. This effectiveness of LDL apheresis appears to be due to recovery of vascular endothelial function and improvement of blood rheology. For diseases that are possibly due to circulation disturbance and that are intractable with drugs alone. LDL apheresis may be worth trying, particularly for patients complicated by hyperlipemia.     

Effects of direct adsorption of lipoproteins apheresis on lipoproteins, low-density lipoprotein subtypes, and hemorheology in hypercholesterolemic patients with coronary artery disease.

Direct adsorption of lipoproteins (DALI) apheresis has been shown to reduce effectively low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and lipoprotein (a) concentrations. However, the effects on nontraditional risk indicators such as hemorheology and LDL subtypes have not been investigated so far. Five patients (2 women, 3 men, age 53 +/- 8 years) with coronary artery disease and severe LDL hypercholesterolemia regularly treated with other LDL apheresis devices entered the study and were then treated with DALI for the first time. Hemorheological and lipoprotein parameters were measured before and immediately after the initial DALI apheresis as well as before the fourth DALI apheresis. Compared to baseline (before the first DALI apheresis), the following parameters were significantly improved (p < 0.05) after the first DALI apheresis: LDL cholesterol (69 +/- 28 versus 208 +/- 82 mg/dl) and cholesterol in each LDL subfraction as well as plasma viscosity (1.23 +/- 0.04 versus 1.37 +/- 0.06 mPa), C-reactive protein, native blood viscosity, red cell aggregation, and red cell deformability. When parameters before the fourth DALI apheresis were compared to baseline, LDL cholesterol was still lower, and red cell deformability was still improved while cholesterol in each subfraction showed a statistical trend to lower concentrations (0.08 < p < 0.14). In conclusion, DALI apheresis not only reduces LDL cholesterol but also induced a significant reduction of cholesterol in all LDL subfractions and improved various hemorheological parameters.     

Exon Skipping of Hepatic APOB Pre-mRNA With Splice-switching Oligonucleotides Reduces LDL Cholesterol In Vivo

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a genetic disorder characterized by extremely high levels of plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL), due to defective LDL receptor-apolipoprotein B (APOB) binding. Current therapies such as statins or LDL apheresis for homozygous FH are insufficiently efficacious at lowering LDL cholesterol or are expensive. Treatments that target APOB100, the structural protein of LDL particles, are potential therapies for FH. We have developed a series of APOB-directed splice-switching oligonucleotides (SSOs) that cause the expression of APOB87, a truncated isoform of APOB100. APOB87, like similarly truncated isoforms expressed in patients with a different condition, familial hypobetalipoproteinemia, lowers LDL cholesterol by inhibiting very low–density lipoprotein (VLDL) assembly and increasing LDL clearance. We demonstrate that these “APO-skip ” SSOs induce high levels of exon skipping and expression of the APOB87 isoform, but do not substantially inhibit APOB48 expression in cell lines. A single injection of an optimized APO-skip SSO into mice transgenic for human APOB resulted in abundant exon skipping that persists for >6 days. Weekly treatments generated a sustained reduction in LDL cholesterol levels of 34–51% in these mice, superior to pravastatin in a head-to-head comparison. These results validate APO-skip SSOs as a candidate therapy for FH.     

Treatment of hypercholesterolemia with heparin-induced extracorporeal low-density lipoprotein precipitation (HELP)

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) can cause early disability and death from premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Patients homozygous for the disease have very high plasma cholesterol, extensive xanthomatosis, and die from atherosclerosis in childhood or early adulthood. Past attempts to improve the prognosis included removal of cholesterol from the circulation by ileal bypass or biliary diversion. Neither treatment was successful. Direct removal by plasmapheresis of low-density lipoprotein (LDL), the primary carrier of cholesterol in plasma, was first performed on an FH homozygous patient in 1966. The treatment was well tolerated and led to rapid diminution of xanthomas. Other experimental treatments included selective LDL apheresis with monoclonal or polyclonal antibody affinity columns. A method for selective LDL apheresis was developed in 1983 by Armstrong, Seidel, and colleagues based on heparin precipitation of LDL at low pH. This method, called HELP, removes all apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins including LDL and lipoprotein (a), as well as some fibrinogen. LDL apheresis by HELP is well tolerated; the incidence of side effects is low, and the treatment has been associated with regression of cardiovascular disease. LDL apheresis, rather than liver transplantation, is the treatment of choice for patients with severe, life-threatening hypercholesterolemia which does not respond to diet and drug therapy. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Comparison of different treatment regimens in a case of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.

The laboratory results of five periods of different treatment regimens were compared in a 19-year-old girl with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH): weekly low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis sessions with dextran sulfate columns (LA 15, Kaneka Corporation, Osaka, Japan) without statin administration; weekly LDL apheresis with polyacrylate columns (DALI, Fresenius Adsorber Technology, Bad Homburg, Germany) without statin; LDL apheresis as in Period 2 with 40 mg atorvastatin daily; LDL apheresis as in Period 2 with 80 mg atorvastatin daily; and fortnightly LDL apheresis sessions with polyacrilate and administration of 80 mg atorvastatin daily. The five treatments were given in the above order, and each lasted at least 2 months. To compare the effectiveness of the different methods, the blood levels of total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol were measured before each session, and the percentage decreases in the blood levels of total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol were recorded during sessions in Periods 1 and 2. In Periods 1 and 2, the biological effectiveness of LDL apheresis was comparable. Atorvastatin (40 mg daily) improved the blood levels of total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol, but lowered HDL-cholesterol values. Increasing the daily dose of atorvastatin from 40 mg to 80 mg did not significantly improve LDL-cholesterol levels. When the time between two sessions was longer (Period 5), the total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol values worsened and were comparable to those of Period 2 during which there was no atorvastatin treatment. In this case of homozygous FH, weekly sessions of LDL apheresis in association with atorvastatin at dose of 40 mg per day gave the best results.     

Genetic and biochemical analyses in dyslipidemic patients undergoing LDL apheresis

Objective : Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) can be due to mutations in LDLR, PCSK9, and APOB. In phenotypically defined patients, a subset remains unresponsive to lipid‐lowering therapies and requires low density‐lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis treatment. In this pilot study, we examined the genotype/phenotype relationship in patients with dyslipidemia undergoing routine LDL apheresis. Design : LDLR, APOB, and PCKS9 were analyzed for disease‐causing mutations in seven patients undergoing routine LDL apheresis. Plasma and serum specimens were collected pre‐ and post‐apheresis and analyzed for lipid concentrations, Lp(a) cholesterol, and lipoprotein particle concentrations (via NMR). Results : We found that four patients harbored LDLR mutations and of these, three presented with xanthomas. While similar reductions in LDL‐cholesterol (LDL‐C), apolipoprotein B, and LDL particles (LDL‐P) were observed following apheresis in all patients, lipid profile analysis revealed the LDLR mutation‐positive cohort had a more pro‐atherogenic profile (higher LDL‐C, apolipoprotein B, LDL‐P, and small LDL‐P) pre‐apheresis. Conclusion : Our data show that not all clinically diagnosed FH patients who require routine apheresis have genetically defined disease. In our small cohort, those with LDLR mutations had a more proatherogenic phenotype than those without identifiable mutations. This pilot cohort suggests that patients receiving the maximum lipid lowering therapy could be further stratified, based on genetic make‐up, to optimize treatment. J. Clin. Apheresis 29:256–265, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

The effect of selective low-density lipoprotein apheresis on plasma lipoperoxides and antioxidant vitamins in familial hypercholesterolemic patients.

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an autosomal dominant genetic disorder characterized by a lifelong elevation in the concentration of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) bound cholesterol in blood by cholesterol deposits and by early coronary artery disease. The LDL apheresis technique has been introduced with the goal of reducing LDL cholesterol levels, thereby preventing the development of atherosclerosis. The literature on LDL apheresis reports 2 different facets, the therapeutic aspect associated with the lessening of LDL concentration and the initiation of a peroxidation process associated with the biocompatibility of the artificial membrane. Lipid and protein peroxidation gives rise to toxic and atherogenic hydroperoxide, mostly lipid hydroperoxides, and derivative compounds, which may offset the benefit of the procedure. In this paper, plasma hydroperoxide levels are determined along with the elevation of the serum and LDL antioxidant status in hypercholesterolemic patients before and following repeated LDL apheresis sessions. Hydroperoxide concentration has been expressed both in terms of plasma volume and LDL concentration. A highly significant increase in LDL lipid hydroperoxides is demonstrated when expressed in terms of LDL concentration and is associated with the LDL apheresis procedure. The usefulness of antioxidant supplementation in LDL apheresis is discussed.     

Low-density lipoprotein apheresis using the Liposorber system: features of the system and clinical benefits.

LDL apheresis using the Liposorber system is indicated for use to remove selectively LDL from the plasma of hypercholesterolemic patients for whom diet and maximum cholesterol-lowering drug therapy have been ineffective or not tolerated. The dextran sulfate immobilized to porous cellulose beads is contained in the adsorption column as the adsorbent. The dextran sulfate has a structure similar to that of the LDL receptor and seems to act as a type of pseudoreceptor for LDL. There have been reported a number of clinical benefits using the Liposorber system for drug refractory hypercholesterolemic patients. Among them, the improvement of endothelial cell function of coronary and brachial arteries by a single treatment is the focus of the world's attention. Moreover, it is also noteworthy that LDL apheresis reduced the incidence of the cardiac events by 70% compared to drug therapy alone. In addition to the clinical benefits of the Liposorber system on familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), the preliminary data suggest that LDL apheresis may improve arteriosclerosis obliterans (ASO) of the lower extremities and focal glomerular sclerosis (FGS).     

Distinct effects of LDL apheresis by hemoperfusion (DALI) and heparin-induced extracorporeal precipitation (HELP) on leukocyte respiratory burst activity of patients with familial hypercholesterolemia

Hypercholesterolemia and oxidative stress are major risk factors in atherogenesis. In the last years, lipid apheresis has been established as an effective clinical therapy by lowering not only elevated plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels but also by reducing the incidence of cardiovascular events. The aim of the present study was to investigate peripheral leukocyte oxidant generation in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) undergoing regular LDL apheresis. The activity state of leukocytes was estimated prior to, immediately after, and 2 days after LDL apheresis carried out by two distinct techniques: hemoperfusion with the DALI system and heparin-induced extracorporeal LDL precipitation (HELP). Oxidant generating activity was measured by chemiluminescence (CL) in whole blood and isolated polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNL). The results of our study show increased baseline respiratory burst activities in FH patients as compared to healthy controls. Apheresis with the HELP system was followed by increases in leukocyte count, zymosan-induced whole blood CL, and plasma PMNL elastase levels. The DALI technique caused no changes in leukocyte count and elastase levels and decreased whole blood CL activity. Two days after lipid removal the observed changes returned to pre-apheresis levels. Leukocyte activity parameters before and after apheresis did not correlate with the corresponding plasma levels of triglycerides, total cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol, suggesting that different handling in the framework of both apheresis techniques rather than lipid profile changes during therapy accounted for leukocyte activity modulation.     

Comparison of different LDL apheresis methods

This article presents the generally accepted indications for LDL apheresis treatment. The available LDL apheresis methods differ with respect to acute relative reductions of LDL cholesterol; mean values after the LDL apheresis treatments are not different. Serum triglycerides, HDL-cholesterol, and lipoprotein(a) are also acutely reduced. Available LDL apheresis methods differ with respect to their impact on the coagulation system, on C-reactive protein and on leukocyte count. Cardiovascular events are clearly reduced by the LDL apheresis methods. There is an urgent need to prospectively compare the different LDL apheresis methods taking into account hard end points. The lower target values for LDL cholesterol suggested by international guidelines for high-risk patients will certainly require a more widespread use of LDL apheresis.     

Comparison of different LDL apheresis methods

This article presents the generally accepted indications for LDL apheresis treatment. The available LDL apheresis methods differ with respect to acute relative reductions of LDL cholesterol; mean values after the LDL apheresis treatments are not different. Serum triglycerides, HDL-cholesterol, and lipoprotein(a) are also acutely reduced. Available LDL apheresis methods differ with respect to their impact on the coagulation system, on C-reactive protein and on leukocyte count. Cardiovascular events are clearly reduced by the LDL apheresis methods. There is an urgent need to prospectively compare the different LDL apheresis methods taking into account hard end points. The lower target values for LDL cholesterol suggested by international guidelines for high-risk patients will certainly require a more widespread use of LDL apheresis.     

Effects of selective LDL apheresis on plasma concentrations of ICAM-1, VCAM-1 and P-selectin in diabetic patients with arteriosclerosis obliterans and receiving maintenance hemodialysis

BACKGROUND: Arteriosclerosis obliterans (ASO) is a serious complication in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) caused by diabetic nephropathy. Adsorption of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) has been performed to treat ASO. While efficacy of this treatment has been reported in limb ischemia, the mechanism underlying the benefit remains unclear. We investigated how LDL adsorption affected soluble adhesion molecules; P-selectin, an endothelial and platelet activation marker; inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-1beta, IL-6 and tissue necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha; and lipids in serum. METHODS: Selective LDL adsorption by dextran sulfate columns (LDL apheresis) was performed weekly for 10 weeks to treat eight hemodialysis patients with ASO, ESRD, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Serum was sampled before and immediately after apheresis. RESULTS: LDL apheresis was performed safely. After LDL apheresis lipid concentrations were significantly reduced and clinical findings, such as Fontaine's classification and ankle brachial pressure index values, were improved. Pretreatment concentrations of soluble intercellular and vascular cell adhesion molecules (sICAM-1 and sVCAM-1) and also P-selectin were higher in patients than healthy controls. After apheresis these decreased, especially P-selectin. IL-1beta, IL-6, and TNF-alpha concentrations before apheresis were similar to those in controls and were unaffected by treatment. CONCLUSION: Effectiveness of LDL apheresis against ASO may involve decreased endothelial cell and platelet activation.     

Familial hypercholesterolaemia: optimum treatment strategies

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a hereditary metabolic disorder characterised by defects in the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor, elevated LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and an extremely high risk for premature cardiovascular disease. Heterozygous FH occurs in about one of every 500 individuals in the United States and Europe. The high prevalence of FH and associated morbidity and mortality strongly support aggressive screening and treatment. There are two major barriers to effective management of FH: 1) the failure to screen for this disease in people who may be at increased risk for it; and 2) the inability of most available therapies to enable achievement of LDL-C goals. More aggressive screening, coupled with new genetic screening techniques, and more powerful 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors have the potential to overcome these limitations. Automated genetic assays are now available for detection of common LDL receptor mutations in individuals at risk for FH, and they have been used effectively to identify patients with this condition. Recent clinical trial results with the new synthetic statin rosuvastatin (Crestor; AstraZeneca, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, Cheshire, UK; licensed from Shionogi & Co, Ltd, Osaka, Japan) in patients with heterozygous FH have shown that it decreased LDL-C by 58% and increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) by 12%. Rosuvastatin was significantly superior to high-dose atorvastatin in improving these lipid parameters as well as total cholesterol, apolipoprotein (apo) B, apo A-I, and the LDL-C/HDL-C ratio. Thus, new screening tools and medical therapies have the potential to significantly improve management and reduce cardiovascular disease risk for patients with FH.     

The familial hypercholesterolemia regression study: a randomized comparison of therapeutic reduction of both low-density lipoprotein and lipoprotein(a) versus low-density lipoprotein alone.

Lipoprotein (a) [Lp (a)] is a risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD), especially in the presence of a raised low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol (LDL-C). To ascertain whether reduction of both LDL and Lp(a) is more advantageous than reduction of LDL alone, patients with heterozygous FH and CHD were selected randomly to receive either LDL apheresis fortnightly plus simvastatin 40 mg/day or colestipol 20 g plus simvastatin 40 mg/day. Quantitative coronary angiography was undertaken before and after 2.1 years. Changes in serum lipids were similar in both groups except for the greater reduction of LDL-C and Lp(a) by apheresis. There were no significant differences in primary angiographic endpoints, and none of the angiographic changes correlated with Lp(a). Although LDL apheresis plus simvastatin was more effective than colestipol plus simvastatin in reducing LDL-C and Lp(a), it was not more beneficial in influencing coronary atherosclerosis. Decreasing Lp(a) seems unnecessary if LDL-C is reduced below 130 mg/dl.