Rectal sensory perception in females with obstructed defecation

PURPOSE: Parasympathetic afferent nerves are thought to mediate rectal filling sensations. The role of sympathetic afferent nerves in the mediation of these sensations is unclear. Sympathetic nerves have been reported to mediate nonspecific sensations in the pelvis or lower abdomen in patients with blocked parasympathetic afferent supply. It has been reported that the parasympathetic afferent nerves are stimulated by both slow ramp (cumulative) and fast phasic (intermittent) distention of the rectum, whereas the sympathetic afferent nerves are only stimulated by fast phasic distention. Therefore, it might be useful to use the two distention protocols to differentiate between a parasympathetic and sympathetic afferent deficit. METHODS: Sixty control subjects (9 males; median age, 48 (range, 20–70) years) and 100 female patients (median age, 50 (range, 18–75) years) with obstructed defecation entered the study. Rectal sensory perception was assessed with an infinitely compliant polyethylene bag and a computer-controlled air-injection system. This bag was inserted into the rectum and inflated with air to selected pressure levels according to two different distention protocols (fast phasic and slow ramp). The distending pressures needed to evoke rectal filling sensations, first sensation of content in the rectum, and earliest urge to defecate were noted, as was the maximum tolerable volume. RESULTS: In all control subjects, rectal filling sensations could be evoked. Twenty-one patients (21 percent) experienced no sensation at all in the pressure range between 0 and 65 mmHg during either slow ramp or fast phasic distention. The pressure thresholds for first sensation, earliest urge to defecate, and maximum tolerable volume were significantly higher in patients with obstructed defecation (P<0.001). In each subject, the pressure thresholds for first sensation, earliest urge to defecate, and maximum tolerable volume were always the same, regardless of the type of distention. CONCLUSION: Rectal sensory perception is blunted or absent in the majority of patients with obstructed defecation. The observation that this abnormality can be detected by both distention protocols suggests that the parasympathetic afferent nerves are deficient. Because none of the patients experienced a nonspecific sensation in the pelvis or lower abdomen during fast phasic distention, it might be suggested that the sympathetic afferents are also deficient. This finding implies that it is not worthwhile to use different distention protocols in patients with obstructed defecation.     

Fecal continence after rectocele repair: a prospective study

Combined transvaginal/transanal rectocele repair was performed in series of 89 consecutive women (mean age 55, range 35–81 years) with obstructed defecation due to a rectocele with a depth of more than 3 cm. The impact of this procedure on anal sphincter pressure and continence status was evaluated prospectively. Anorectal manometry was carried out before and after surgery (at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months). The following measurements were performed: maximal anal resting pressure (MARP), maximal anal squeeze pressure (MASP), and rectal sensory perception including first initial sensation, urge to defecate, and maximum tolerable volumes (MTV). The outcome was successful in 71% of patients with respect to symptoms such as the need for straining at defecation, manual assistance, feelings of incomplete evacuation, sense of rectal fullness, constipation, abdominal pain, and the use of laxatives. However, after rectocele repair seven patients experienced deterioration in fecal continence, and dyspareunia developed in 41% of the sexually active patients. Manometric studies revealed a significant decline in mean of 18% of MARP and 16% of MASP. In contrast to MASP, MARP gradually improved during the follow-up period. Distending volumes required for initial sensation and urge to defecate did not change after the procedure. MTV values were significantly lower 3 and 6 months after rectocele repair than those before and 24 months after surgery. MARP and MASP values after surgery did not differ between patients with impaired and those with normal continence. In conclusion, transvaginal/transanal rectocele repair is beneficial for patients with obstructed defecation; however, care should be taken in sexually active patients, and patients at risk of developing fecal incontinence. Accepted: 24 November 1999     

Selection criteria for anterior rectal wall repair in symptomatic rectocele and anterior rectal wall prolapse

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to determine the outcome and changes produced by an endorectal anterior wall repair in objective functional parameters using anorectal manometry and defecography and to asses their usefulness in the selection of patients for the operation. METHODS: Between 1986 and 1990, we performed a prospective study of 76 consecutive patients with symptomatic rectocele and/or an anterior rectal wall prolapse. All patients were studied prospectively according to a fixed protocol. Standard questionnaire, defecation diary, clinical examination, defecography, and anal manometry were performed preoperatively and three to four months postoperatively. RESULTS: Three months postoperatively, 38 patients (50 percent) had no complaints at all (excellent result), 32 (42 percent) had only a minor complaint (good result), and in 6 patients (8 percent) the complaints were essentially unchanged (unsatisfactory result). After one year, similar figures were obtained. The postoperative mean stool frequency in all patients after three months was significantly increased (P <0.05) but not after one year. Postoperative defecographies showed a complete absence or significant diminution of the rectocele at three months and were significantly correlated with relief of symptoms. An inverse correlation was found between improvement in incontinence grade after operation and (larger) preoperative volume at which urge to defecate was elicited, making it a good predictor of improvement in incontinence by the operation. CONCLUSIONS: The anterior rectal wall repair positively influences rectal sensation in patients with incontinence and/or obstructed defecation caused by a rectocele and/or an anterior rectal wall prolapse. Anorectal manometry was useful in studying the beneficial physiologic effects of the endorectal repair. In patients with no previous pelvic surgery, a large urge to defecate volume is a good predictor of a good clinical outcome.     

Analysis of patients with poor outcome of rectocele repair

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to analyze the prognostic value of clinical data and physiologic tests in patients undergoing rectocele repair for obstructed defecation. METHODS: Between 1988 and 1996, 89 consecutive female patients with obstructed defecation caused by a rectocele were enrolled in the study. Median age at time of presentation was 55 (range, 35–81) years. All patients underwent a combined transvaginal and transanal rectocele repair. End evaluation to assess long-term results was performed by an independent observer after a median duration of follow up of 52 (range, 12–92) months. The presence of the following five symptoms was evaluated: prolonged and unsuccessful straining at stool, feelings of incomplete evacuation, manual assistance during defecation, false urge to defecate, and a stool frequency of less than three times per week. When none or just one of these symptoms was present, outcome of rectocele repair was considered successful. The outcome was considered as a failure when two or more of these symptoms were recorded. Furthermore, all patients were asked to score the outcome of their operations as excellent, good, moderate, or poor. Clinical data and the results of physiologic tests obtained in patients with a poor outcome of surgery were compared with those obtained in patients with a successful outcome. RESULTS: Objective outcome of rectocele repair, based on the presence of symptoms, was found to be successful in 63 (71 percent) patients. Sixty-one patients considered outcome of surgery excellent or good (69 percent). Graded subjective outcomes between the two groups showed significantly better grades in cases of success. Duration of symptoms, number of symptoms, age, parity, and previous hysterectomy had no influence on the final outcome of surgery. Defecographic parameters, such as size of the rectocele, barium trapping in the rectocele, poor rectal evacuation, or intussusception, had no prognostic value. Signs of anismus based on defecography, electromyography, and balloon-expulsion studies did not influence outcome of surgery. The presence of symptoms such as defecation frequency, manual assistance, severe straining, false urge to defecate, or feelings of incomplete evacuation had no impact on the outcome. However, in patients without a daily urge to defecate or with a stool frequency of less than once per week, results of rectocele repair were significantly worse than in patients with a daily urge to defecate or a defecation frequency of more than once per week or both. In 14 of 26 patients with a poor outcome, colonic transit studies were performed. A delayed passage was observed throughout the entire colon in seven patients, in the left part of the colon and the rectosigmoid colon in four patients, and in the rectosigmoid colon in one patient. In two patients colonic transit was normal. CONCLUSIONS: Combined transvaginal and transanal rectocele repair is beneficial for the majority of patients with obstructed defecation. In patients without a daily urge to defecate or a stool frequency of less than once per week, indicating colonic malfunctioning, the outcome of rectocele repair seems to be poor.     

The perineorectal reflex The perineorectal reflex in health and obstructed defecation

PURPOSE: Many females with obstructed defecation apply digital pressure on their perineum to facilitate defecation. This study investigated the impact of this maneuver on rectal tone. METHODS: Forty-five female patients with obstructed defecation were studied. Thirty-four patients (76 percent) regularly applied digital pressure on their perineum to facilitate defecation. Total colonic transit time was normal in 32 patients and prolonged in 13 patients. For comparison, 17 female controls were studied. With the subject in the left lateral position, a thin, infinitely compliant polyethylene bag was inserted into the rectum at 10 cm from the anal canal. Rectal tone was assessed by measuring variations in bag volume with a computer-controlled electromechanical air injection system. After an adaptation period of 15 minutes, digital pressure was applied to the anterior perineum by one of the authors (WRS). In a second recording session, the tonic response of the rectum to an evoked urge to defecate was examined. RESULTS: During the application of perineal pressure, all controls showed an increase in rectal tone (mean value, 52.8 ± 19 percent). In the whole patient group, this response was significantly lower (mean value, 24.2 ± 19 percent; P < 0.001). Eight of these patients (18 percent) showed no response at all. None of them applied perineal pressure. In the remaining 37 patients (72 percent), the perineorectal reflex was present but was significantly lower (mean value, 29.8 ± 17 percent; P < 0.001). Thirty-four of these females (92 percent) stated that they applied perineal pressure on a regular basis to facilitate their defecation. All controls showed an increase in rectal tone during an evoked urge to defecate (mean value, 37.8 ± 8 percent). In the patients, this response was significantly lower (16.7 ± 6 percent). Eight of these patients showed no increase in rectal tone at all. These patients were the same patients in whom the perineorectal reflex was absent. Regarding the tonic response of the rectum to perineal pressure, no difference was found between patients with a normal colonic transit time and those with a prolonged colonic transit time. CONCLUSION: Digital pressure applied on the perineum results in an increase in rectal tone. This perineorectal reflex is present, although significantly lower, in the majority of females with obstructed defecation. This observation might explain why females with obstructed defecation frequently apply perineal pressure to facilitate defecation.     

Rectal wall contractility in response to an evoked urge to defecate in patients with obstructed defecation

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine rectal sensory perception and rectal wall contractility in response to an evoked urge to defecate and to identify differences between control subjects and patients with obstructed defecation. METHODS: Twenty control patients (10 men; median age, 47 (range, 17–78) years) and 29 female patients with disabling obstructed defecation (median age, 48 (range, 18–70) years) entered the study. Under radiologic control, an infinitely compliant barostat balloon was inserted over a guide wire into the proximal part of the rectum. Additionally, a latex balloon was introduced into the distal part of the rectum. This latex balloon was inflated until an urge to defecate was experienced. Simultaneously, rectal wall contractility was assessed by measuring the variations in barostat balloon volume. These variations were expressed as percentage changes from baseline volume. RESULTS: By comparing controls and patients with obstructed defecation, a significant difference was found regarding mean distending volume required to elicit an urge to defecate (135±38vs. 214±87 ml of air;P<0.001, Mann-WhitneyU-test). In all controls, the evocation of an urge to defecate induced a pronounced increase in rectal tone, proximal to the distal stimulating balloon. By comparing controls and patients, the increase in rectal tone was found to be significantly higher in control subjects (35±10vs. 9±10 percent;P<0.001). Twenty-five patients (86 percent) showed no or only minimum (<20 percent) increase in rectal tone during the perception of an urge to defecate. In 14 of these patients, the threshold for this perception was increased. Only four patients (14 percent) showed a relatively normal increase (>20 percent) in rectal tone. However, their threshold for perception was greatly increased. CONCLUSION: The assembly used in this study provides a useful tool for investigation of rectal evacuation. In all of our patients, obstructed defecation was associated with abnormal rectal sensory perception and/or altered rectal wall contractility.Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, June 22 to 26, 1997.     

The gastrorectal reflex in women with obstructed defecation

This study evaluated the tonic response of the rectum to a meal in women with obstructed defecation. Fifteen control subjects and 60 women with obstructed defecation were studied. Total colonic transit time was normal in 30 patients (group I) and prolonged in the other 30 (group II). After over-night fasting an "infinitely compliant" polyethylene bag was inserted into the rectum. Rectal tone was assessed by measuring variations in bag volume with a computerized electromechanical air injection system. After an adaptation period of 30 min all subjects consumed a 450-kcal liquid meal. Postprandial recordings were continued for 3 h. In a second recording session we investigated the tonic response of the rectum to an evoked urge to defecate. In a third session rectal sensory perception was assessed. Following the meal all controls showed an increase in rectal tone (mean 74.8 +/- 17%). Patients in whom colonic transit time was normal showed a similar tonic response. In group II the increase in rectal tone was significantly lower (mean 27.8 +/- 10%; P < 0.001). Three patients of this group showed no response to a meal at all. All controls showed an increase in rectal tone during an evoked urge to defecate (mean 39.2 +/- 9%). In both groups this tonic response was absent or significantly blunted (mean 15.3 +/- 6% and 16.4 +/- 5%, respectively; P < 0.001). In both groups rectal sensory perception was significantly impaired. In conclusion, patients with obstructed defecation in whom colonic transit time is normal have an intact gastrorectal reflex. The increase in rectal tone after a meal is absent or blunted in patients with obstructed defecation in whom transit time is prolonged. The tonic response of the rectum to an evoked urge to defecate as well as rectal sensory perception are significantly impaired both in patients with a normal and in those with a prolonged transit time.     

Rectal Hyposensitivity

PURPOSE: Blunted rectal sensation, or rectal hyposensitivity, has been reported anecdotally in patients with functional disorders of evacuation and continence. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of rectal hyposensitivity and whether the finding of such an abnormality was associated with any clinical impact. METHODS: One thousand three hundred fifty-one patients, referred for anorectal physiologic investigation, were divided according to presenting symptoms into the following categories: constipation (subdivided into infrequency of and/or obstructed defecation), fecal incontinence (subdivided into passive, postdefecation, and urge incontinence), fecal incontinence and constipation, or other. Rectal hyposensitivity was judged to be present when at least one of the sensory threshold volumes was elevated beyond the normal range (mean plus 2 standard deviations). The prevalence of rectal hyposensitivity was then calculated in each group and in relation to other investigations. RESULTS: Rectal hyposensitivity was present in 16 percent of patients, with males and females equally affected. Twenty-three percent of patients with constipation, 10 percent of patients with fecal incontinence, 27 percent of patients with incontinence associated with constipation, and only 5 percent of patients with other symptoms were found to have rectal hyposensitivity. In patients with obstructed defecation, rectal hyposensitivity was present in 33 percent with rectocele, 40 percent with intussusception, and 53 percent with no mechanical obstruction evident on evacuation proctography. CONCLUSION: Rectal hyposensitivity is common in patients with constipation and/or fecal incontinence and may thus be important in the etiology of such conditions. Although the clinical relevance of this physiologic abnormality is unknown, its presence may have implications regarding the management of hindgut dysfunction and particularly the selection of patients for surgery.     

Viscous fluid retention: A new method for evaluating anorectal function

The ability to retain viscous fluid in the standing position was tested in 22 patients with fecal incontinence, 11 patients with constipation, and 26 control subjects. Viscous fluid was introduced into the rectum in increments of 50 ml. The examination was stopped when the patient complained of discomfort or the viscous fluid leaked. Eighteen of 22 patients with fecal incontinence leaked fluid, while none of the control subjects and only four of the constipated patients did so. Patients with fecal incontinence retained significantly less viscous fluid than did control subjects, whereas no difference was found between patients with constipation and control subjects. Rectal sensation from distention with air was tested in the patients as well as in the control group. The following volumes and pressures at each sensation were measured: 1) earliest defecation urge (EDU), 2) constant defecation urge (CDU), and 3) maximum tolerable volume (MTV). Patients with fecal incontinence had lower volumes than control subjects at all sensations, while patients with constipation had higher volumes at earliest defecation urge and at constant defecation urge. Rectal compliance was higher in patients with fecal incontinence than in control subjects, whereas patients with constipation did not differ from control subjects. Regression analysis showed a linear relationship between viscous fluid retention and the maximum tolerable volume and also between viscous fluid retention and rectal compliance. No difference in the ability to retain viscous fluid between male and female control subjects was found; regression analysis of viscous fluid retention in relation to age revealed decreasing volumes with increasing age. Day-to-day variation of the ability to retain viscous fluid was tested in eight persons, and reproducibility was found to be good.     

Rectal tone in response to bisacodyl in women with obstructed defecation

This study investigated the tonic response of the rectum to topical application of bisacodyl in women with obstructed defecation. Forty-five women with obstructed defecation, and 15 female controls were studied. Total colonic transit time was normal in 35 patients, and prolonged in 10. For the purpose of this study an "infinitely compliant" polyethylene bag was inserted into the rectum. Rectal tone was assessed by measuring variations in bag volume with a computerized electromechanical "barostat" system. After an adaptation period of 30 min, a suppository containing 10 mg bisacodyl was inserted into the rectum. Recording was continued for 90 min. In a second recording session rectal tone in response to an evoked urge to defecate was assessed. In a third session we investigated rectal sensory perception. After a mean time interval of 30 +/- 15 min following intrarectal application of bisacodyl, all controls showed a significant increase in rectal tone (mean value: 68.2 +/- 12%). In patients with a normal transit time, a similar increase was observed. In patients with prolonged transit time, the tonic response of the rectum to bisacodyl was significantly lower (mean 21.1 +/- 11%; P < 0.001). Five of these patients showed no response at all. In the second recording session, all controls showed an increase in rectal tone during an evoked urge to defecate (mean 36.3 +/- 7%). In both patient groups this tonic response was absent or significantly blunted (mean 19.2 +/- 6%) (P < 0.001). In both patient groups rectal sensory perception was impaired significantly. In conclusion, rectal tone increases significantly after topical application of bisacodyl in controls as well as in patients with obstructed defecation in whom transit time is normal. This tonic response is absent or significantly blunted in patients with a prolonged transit time. Both the tonic response of the rectum to an evoked urge to defecate and rectal sensory perception are significantly impaired in patients with a normal and those with a prolonged transit time.     

Long-Term Results of the Anterior Delorme’s Operation in the Management of Symptomatic Rectocele

PURPOSE Although the results of surgery for symptomatic rectocele seem satisfactory initially, there is a trend toward deterioration with time. This study was designed to assess the long-term outcome of Anterior Delormes operation for rectocele.METHODS Questionnaires were sent to all females who had Anterior Delormes operation performed in Auckland between 1990 and 2000. The questionnaires included obstructed defecation symptoms and a validated fecal incontinence severity index questionnaire and fecal incontinence quality of life questionnaire. Preoperative and postoperative obstructed defecation symptoms and incontinence score were compared.RESULTS A total of 150 females (mean age, 56 (range, 30–83) years) who had an Anterior Delormes operation for a rectocele were identified. One hundred seven patients (71.5 percent; mean age, 56 years) completed the questionnaire. Median follow-up was four (range, 2–11) years. The number of patients with obstructed defecation reduced from 87 preoperatively to 23 postoperatively using Rome II criteria (P < 0.0001). Postoperatively there was a reduction in the number of patients with each of the symptoms of obstructed defecation from 83 to 27 for straining, 87 to 33 for incomplete emptying, 64 to 14 for feeling of blockage, 41 to 10 for digitation (P < 0.0001 for all). The median incontinence score reduced from 20 of 61 preoperatively to 12 of 61 postoperatively (P = 0.0001).CONCLUSIONS In patients with symptomatic rectocele, Anterior Delormes operation provides long-term benefit for patients with obstructed defecation and leads to a significant improvement of incontinence scores.Presented at the scientific meeting of the Surgical Society of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand, September 17, 2003.     

Rectoanal Sensorimotor Response in Humans During Rectal Distension

PURPOSE: Rectal perception facilitates maintenance of continence and defecation. Whether perception is associated with motor changes in anorectum is unclear. We examined sensory and motor responses of the anorectum during rectal distention. METHODS: Stepwise graded rectal balloon distensions were performed in 23 healthy subjects by placing a six-sensor probe in the anorectum. Manometric changes, rectoanal reflexes, and sensory thresholds were assessed. Studies were repeated in six subjects. RESULTS: All subjects showed rectoanal inhibitory and contractile reflexes, but rectal perception was associated with an anal contractile response (sensorimotor response). In 4 subjects (17 percent) the sensorimotor response first occurred synchronously with a sensation of fullness (Group 1) and in 19 (83 percent) with a desire to defecate (Group 2). Mean balloon volume for inducing the sensorimotor response in Groups 1 and 2 were 80 +/- 14 ml and 96 +/- 26 ml (P > 0.05). The onset, amplitude, duration, and area under curve of the response were similar in both groups. At higher volumes of balloon distention, all subjects (n = 23) reported a desire and an urge to defecate. The sensorimotor response associated with an urge to defecate had higher amplitude (P = 0.01) and higher area under curve (P = 0.001) compared with that associated with a desire to defecate. Repeat studies showed good reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.9; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A desire to defecate is associated with a unique, consistent, and reproducible anal contractile response: the sensorimotor response. This response could play an integral role in regulating anorectal sensation and function.     

Role of defecography in predicting clinical outcome of rectocele repair

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of defecography in predicting clinical outcome of rectocele repair. METHODS: Between January 1988 and July 1994, 74 consecutive patients (median age, 54 (range, 35–81) years) with a rectocele and symptoms of obstructed defecation were studied prospectively. After preoperative evaluation by a standardized questionnaire, physical examination, and defecography, a combined transvaginal/transanal rectocele repair was performed. At follow-up, all patients had defecography. Long-term results were qualified by an independent observer after a median follow-up of 58 (range, 14–89) months as excellent, good, or poor. RESULTS: Rectocele repair was considered excellent in 37 patients and good in 13 patients. Defecography six months after surgery did not show persistent or recurrent rectocele in any of the patients. Size of the rectocele, barium-trapping in the rectocele, internal intussusception, rectal evacuation, and perineal descent did not appear to influence clinical outcome. Radiologic evidence of anismus did not correlate with longterm results of rectocele repair. CONCLUSIONS: Combined transanal/transvaginal repair of rectocele is an efficient therapy in patients with obstructed defecation. Various defecographic parameters (size of rectocele, internal intussusception, rectal evacuation, perineal descent, radiologic signs of anismus) do not appear to influence clinical outcome of surgery. The main value of defecography is the objective demonstration of rectocele and any associated abnormalities such as an enterocele preoperatively and again in objective assessment of the postoperative results.     

The influence of age on posterior pelvic floor dysfunction in women with obstructed defecation syndrome

Background

Knowledge of risk factors is particularly useful to prevent or manage pelvic floor dysfunction but although a number of such factors have been proposed, results remain inconsistent. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of aging on the incidence of posterior pelvic floor disorders in women with obstructed defecation syndrome evaluated using echodefecography.

Methods

A total of 334 patients with obstructed defecation were evaluated using echodefecography in order to quantify posterior pelvic floor dysfunction (rectocele, intussusception, mucosal prolapse, paradoxical contraction or non-relaxation of the puborectalis muscle, and grade III enterocele/sigmoidocele). Patients were grouped according to the age (Group I?=?patients up to 50?years of age; Group II?=?patients over 50?years of age) to evaluate the isolated and associated incidence of dysfunctions. To evaluate the relationship between dysfunction and age-related changes, patients were also stratified into decades.

Results

Group I included 196 patients and Group II included 138. The incidence of significant rectocele, intussusception, rectocele associated with intussusception, rectocele associated with mucosal prolapse and 3 associated disorders was higher in Group II, whereas anismus was more prevalent in Group I. The incidence of significant rectocele, intussusception, mucosal prolapse and grade III enterocele/sigmoidocele was found to increase with age. Conversely, anismus decreased with age.

Conclusions

Aging was shown to influence the incidence of posterior pelvic floor disorders (rectocele, intussusception, mucosa prolapse and enterocele/sigmoidocele), but not the incidence of anismus, in women with obstructed defecation syndrome.     

Rectal afferent hypersensitivity and compliance in irritable bowel syndrome: differences between diarrhoea-predominant and constipation-predominant subgroups

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the differences in rectal compliance and sensory thresholds for the urge to defecate and discomfort between irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) subgroups and controls, and to correlate these parameters with rectal symptoms. METHODS: A total of 38 IBS patients [Rome II criteria; 19 diarrhoea-predominant IBS (D-IBS), 16 constipation-predominant IBS (C-IBS), three with alternating diarrhoea and constipation IBS (Alt-IBS)] and 10 controls were studied. A barostat was used to measure rectal compliance and sensory thresholds, in the 'unprepared' rectum. The thresholds for the urge to defecate and discomfort were determined using phasic rectal balloon distension in a double random staircase sequence. RESULTS: D-IBS had significantly lower rectal compliance and threshold for the urge to defecate compared with controls [4 ml/mmHg interquartile range (IQR) 3.99 versus 8.4 ml/mmHg IQR 5.69; P=0.001; 8 mmHg IQR 6 versus 20 mmHg IQR 4; P=0.003]. D-IBS also had significantly lower rectal compliance and threshold for the urge to defecate compared with the C-IBS group (5.8 ml/mmHg IQR 4.61; P=0.027; 16 mmHg IQR 12; P=0.003). The volume at the threshold for discomfort was significantly lower in D-IBS compared with controls (163 ml IQR 99.5 versus 212 ml IQR 147.25; P=0.016). The severity of abdominal pain and rectal symptoms showed a significantly negative correlation with rectal sensory thresholds. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the sensory threshold for the urge to defecate and rectal compliance is significantly lower in D-IBS compared with C-IBS and controls. The consequent inability to tolerate rectal faecal loading may account for the symptoms of the passage of frequent, small-volume stools in D-IBS patients.     

Transperineal Rectocele Repair with Polyglycolic Acid Mesh: A Case Series

Purpose

This study was designed to evaluate the outcome of transperineal rectocele repair using polyglycolic acid mesh.

Methods

Eighty-three consecutive females with predominant, symptomatic Stage II or Stage III rectocele underwent transperineal rectocele repair using polyglycolic acid (Soft PGA Felt®) mesh and finished their six-month follow-up. No additional interventions, including levatoroplasty or perineorraphy, were performed. The preoperative and postoperative symptom scores and stages of the posterior vaginal wall prolapse were recorded. The end points were reassessed at six months, postoperatively.

Results

Preoperatively, 39 patients had Stage II and 44 patients had Stage III rectocele. The mean total symptom score was 9.87?±?1.93, which was reduced to 1.62?±?0.59 postoperatively (P?

Conclusions

Transperineal repair of rectocele with the polyglycolic acid mesh is an efficient therapy for patients with rectocele. It is highly successful in eliminating symptoms of obstructed defecation, and it is free of significant complications.

     

Laparoscopic or Transanal Repair of Rectocele? A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study

PURPOSE The aim of the study was to analyze the functional and physiologic outcome of patients undergoing laparoscopic rectocele repair compared to a matched cohort undergoing transanal repair.METHODS Forty patients with a rectocele who had undergone laparoscopic pelvic floor repair by a laparoscopic gynecologist were matched for age and rectocele size with 40 patients who had undergone a transanal repair by a colorectal surgeon. All patients had clinical evidence of a symptomatic rectocele. All patients were assessed postoperatively with a quality of life (SF-36) score, a modified St. Marks continence score, a urinary dysfunction score, a Watts sexual dysfunction score, and a linear analog patient satisfaction score. Fifteen patients in each group had also undergone preoperative and postoperative anal manometry.RESULTS At 44 months median follow-up, the transanal approach resulted in significantly more patients reporting bowel symptom alleviation (P < 0.002) and higher patient satisfaction (P < 0.003). The bowel symptom improvement was also sustained over a significantly longer period (P < 0.03). Only 11 patients (28 percent) in the laparoscopic group reported more than 50 percent improvement in their bowel symptoms compared to 25 patients (63 percent) in the transanal group. On univariate analysis of 50 percent bowel symptom improvement, a larger rectocele (P < 0.009), transanal repair (P < 0.02), and presenting with obstructive defecation rather than fecal incontinence (P < 0.03) were statistically significant. Rectocele size (P < 0.012) and treatment cohort (P < 0.006) remained significant on multivariate analysis. Postoperatively, bowel symptom alleviation correlated with patient satisfaction in both groups (P < 0.015). Although not statistically significant, five patients (13 percent) in the transanal group developed postoperative fecal incontinence, which was associated with a low maximum anal resting pressure preoperatively that was further diminished postoperatively (P > 0.06). Only one patient (3 percent) in the laparoscopic group reported a decline in fecal continence, but four patients (10 percent) reported worsening of their symptoms of obstructed defecation. Postoperative dyspareunia was reported by 24 patients in total (30 percent), with significantly more in the transanal group (P > 0.05).CONCLUSIONS The transanal repair results in a statistically greater alleviation of bowel symptoms and greater patient satisfaction scores. However, this approach may have a greater degree of functional co-morbidity than the laparoscopic rectocele repair.The work was supported by grants from The Harry Triguboff Research Scholarship, Sydney Colorectal Associates, Sydney, Australia.This study was presented at the Australian Gynecologic Endoscopy Society Annual Scientific Meeting, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, May 21 to 24, 2003.Reprints are not available.     

Anal Continence After Rectocele Repair

INTRODUCTION: Rectocele may be associated with both chronic constipation and anal incontinence. Several different surgical procedures have been advocated for rectocele repair. The aim of the present study was to evaluate anorectal function and clinical outcome in a consecutive series of patients who underwent selected endorectal or transperineal surgery for rectocele for whom operative treatment was determined by clinical and proctographic features. Attention was paid to the cohort of rectocele patients presenting with incontinence as a leading symptom. METHODS: Sixty consecutive patients with symptomatic rectocele underwent surgical treatment at our institution. Fifty-eight of the patients were female (mean age 56; range, 21–70 years). Incontinence was graded according to a previously reported scoring system that accounts for the type and frequency of incontinence episodes. Preoperative anorectal manometry was performed using an open perfused polyethylene probe. Rectal sensation was recorded by balloon distention. Endoanal ultrasonography was performed with a 7.5-MHz probe. Preoperative defecography was performed at rest and on maximal squeeze and straining. Patients with obstructed defecation as their principal symptom, with associated mucosal rectal prolapse, underwent an endorectal procedure. For patients with associated anal incontinence (Grade B2 or greater), and without a rectal mucosal prolapse, a transperineal approach was performed with either an anterior external overlapping sphincteroplasty or levatorplasty. The median follow-up was 48 (range, 9–122) months. RESULTS: There was no operative mortality. Postoperative complications occurred in 18 patients (30 percent). Of 43 patients with incontinence, 34 (79 percent) were available for postoperative evaluation. None were fully continent. However, in 25 patients (73.5 percent), continence improved after surgery; half had only mucus soiling or loss of gas. Incontinence scores decreased (i.e., improved) from 4.8 ± 0.9 to 3.9 ± 0.9 (P = 0.002). A significant improvement was found both after transanal and perineal procedures. Only ten initially continent patients were available for postoperative assessment. All patients stated that they had clinical improvement in constipation. Their preoperative mean anal resting pressure was 62.5 ± 3.9 (standard error of the mean) mmHg, with a postoperative mean of 75.5 ± 7 mmHg. The preoperative mean squeeze pressure was 83.1 ± 8.5 mmHg, with a mean postoperative squeeze pressure of 88.5 ± 7.9 mmHg (P = not significant). The maximal tolerable volumes were all within normal limits, confirming the proctographic evidence that there were no cases of megarectum in our patient series. The pudendal nerve terminal motor latency was abnormal in all but two patients with incontinence (mean pudendal nerve terminal motor latency = 3.1; range, 1.2–4 milliseconds). Rectoceles recurred in six patients (10 percent): five after a Block procedure and one after a Sarles-type operation. The postoperative endosonographic appearance varied according to the nature of the procedure performed. CONCLUSION: There are few data concerning patients with rectocele who have associated anal incontinence, however, surgical decision analysis resulted in improvement in both constipation and incontinence in the majority of our patients with rectocele. Nevertheless, because none of the patients gained full continence postoperatively, pelvic floor rehabilitation might be also needed to achieve better sphincter function in patients with incontinence.     

Outcomes of Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection vs. Biofeedback for the Treatment of Outlet Obstruction Associated with Rectal Intussusception and Rectocele: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial

Purpose  This study was designed to assess the safety and outcomes achieved with stapled transanal rectal resection vs. biofeedback training in obstructed defecation patients. Methods  A total of 119 women patients who suffered from obstructed defecation with associated rectocele and rectal intussusception were randomized to stapled transanal rectal resection or biofeedback training. Stapled transanal rectal resection was performed by using two circular staplers to produce transanal full-thickness rectal resection. Primary outcome was symptoms of obstructed defecation resolution at 12 months; secondary outcomes included safety, change in quality of life score, and anatomic correction of rectocele and rectal intussusception. Results  Fourteen percent (8/59) stapled transanal rectal resection and 50 percent (30/60) biofeedback training patients withdrew early. Eight (15 percent) patients treated with stapled transanal rectal resection and 1 (2 percent) biofeedback patient experienced adverse events. One serious adverse event (bleeding) occurred after stapled transanal rectal resection. Scores of obstructed defecation improved significantly in both groups as did quality of life (both P < 0.0001). Successful treatment was observed in 44 (81.5 percent) stapled transanal rectal resection vs. 13 (33.3 percent) evaluable biofeedback training patients (P < 0.0001). Functional benefit was observed early and remained stable during the study. Conclusions  In this controlled trial, stapled transanal rectal resection was well tolerated, was more effective than biofeedback training for the resolution of obstructed defecation symptoms, and improved quality of life, with minimal risk of impaired continence. Thus, stapled transanal rectal resection offers a new treatment alternative for obstructed defecation after failure of conservative measures including biofeedback training, a noninvasive approach. Supported by grants from Ethicon Endo-Surgery (Europe) GmbH, Norderstedt, Germany. Presented at the meeting of the European Society of Colo-Proctology (ESCP), Malta, September 26 to 29, 2007. An erratum to this article can be found at     

慢性特发性便秘患者肛门直肠的动力改变

目的　测定慢性特发性便秘患者肛门直肠压力 ,探讨肛门直肠动力障碍在便秘发病机制中的作用。方法　采用美国Sandhill公司生产的BioLAB动力学参数监测系统及固态压力传感器导管 ,对 40例CIC患者进行肛门直肠压力测定 ,并与 40例正常人进行对比。结果　便秘组肛管静息压、最大缩榨压、最大缩榨间期及缩榨指数均明显低于对照组 (P <0 0 5 ,P <0 0 5 ,P <0 0l,P<0 0 1) ;模拟排便动作时肛管剩余压明显高于对照组 (P <0 0 0 1) ,肛管松弛率、排便指数均低于对照组 ,统计学处理具有显著性差异 ;初始感阈值容量大于对照组 (P <0 0 0 1) ,排便感阈值大于对照组 (P <0 0 5 ) ,最大耐受量明显低于对照组 (P <0 0 1)。结论　慢性特发性便秘病人存在肛管直肠的动力学异常及直肠敏感性降低