Sudden infant death syndrome: How much mothers and health professionals know

Background: Behavioral risk factors are associated with sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). Education about the risk factors of SIDS is important for prevention. Our aim was to determine the knowledge and attitude of parents and health professionals about SIDS. Methods: A total of 174 health professionals and 150 mothers were enrolled in this study. Mothers' data were collected by telephone interview and health‐care professionals were interviewed by the same investigator. Results: Only 39% of mothers were aware of SIDS. Forty‐six percent of the mothers preferred a supine sleeping position for their infant and 16% of the parents were bed‐sharing with their infants. Seventy‐three percent of health professionals selected side, 17% supine and 10% prone sleeping position as the safest sleeping position. Frequencies for awareness of risk factors were: bed‐sharing (75%), soft bedding (70%), pillow use (52%), toys in bed (90%), high room temperature (67%) and smoking (88%). Total knowledge score of health professionals who selected supine sleeping position as the safest was significantly higher (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Most of the mothers were unaware of SIDS and less than half preferred a supine sleeping position for their infant. Only 72% of health professionals recommended a certain sleeping position during family interviews. Health professionals are more often recommending the side sleeping position or prone. Education of families and health professionals for the risk factors of SIDS may reduce the number of deaths from SIDS in Istanbul.     

Review Article Reducing the risk of sudden infant death syndrome: A review of the scientific literature

In March 1997 a multidisciplinary forum was convened by the National SIDS Council of Australia to review recent evidence concerning risk factors of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) and to revise and refine the current guidelines for reducing the risk of SIDS. The forum provided an assessment of the evidence for recommendations to reduce the risk of SIDS using an evidence-based process. Strong evidence has now accumulated that the intervention campaigns to reduce prone sleeping during infancy have been followed by SIDS rate declines. Recent data indicate that the supine position is not associated with an increase in significant morbidity outcomes and provides greater protection for SIDS than the side position, which may be unstable. Covering of the baby's head by bedding is strongly related to SIDS. The infant's sleeping environment should be carefully set up to ensure that the baby's head, including the face, cannot be obstructed during sleep.
  Parental smoking is strongly associated with SIDS. Structural supportive interventions for parental smoking cessation are required. Bedsharing increases the risk of SIDS amongst smokers and the data are currently not sufficient to provide complete reassurance to nonsmoking parents that bedsharing is safe. Infants should be maintained in a comfortable temperature zone. The evidence for a protective effect of breast-feeding is conflicting, so breast-feeding cannot be promoted strongly as reducing the risk of SIDS. Immunisation has not been associated with SIDS.
  Parents and carers should be aware of the current guidelines. Health professionals should also be aware of the evidence on which the current recommendations are based. Effective health education programmes should lead to a further decline in SIDS mortality in Australia.     

Effect of prone sleeping on circulatory control in infants.

BACKGROUND: The mechanism of death in sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) remains unclear. Progressive bradycardia is the pre-eminent terminal event, suggesting that circulatory failure might be a crucial factor. Vasomotor tone regulates the circulatory system by controlling blood volume distribution while maintaining venous return and blood pressure. AIM: To examine whether prone sleeping, the most consistently identified risk factor for SIDS, has a measurable influence on vasomotor/circulatory control. METHODS: 44 full term infants (mean age, 7.9 weeks) were studied during an overnight sleep. Recordings were made while the infants were horizontal and asleep in the supine and prone positions, and repeated after a head up tilt to 60 degrees, maintained for 30 minutes, while in both sleep positions. Blood pressure, heart rate, anterior shin, and anterior abdominal wall skin temperatures were measured. RESULTS: Systolic blood pressure was lower, but peripheral skin temperature and heart rate were higher during sleep, while horizontal, in the prone rather than the supine position. After tilting, there was a greater reduction in blood pressure and a greater increase in peripheral skin temperature and heart rate when in the prone position. Anterior abdominal wall skin temperature did not vary in either sleeping positions while horizontal or tilted. CONCLUSION: Prone sleeping has a measurable effect on circulatory control, with a reduction in vasomotor tone resulting in peripheral vasodilatation, a higher peripheral skin temperature, a lower blood pressure, and a higher resting heart rate. Because vasomotor tone is crucially important in circulatory control this could be a factor in increasing the risk of SIDS.     

Effects of the supine and prone position on diaphragm thickness in healthy term infants.

BACKGROUND: The physiological basis underlying the decline in the incidence of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) associated with changing the sleep position from prone to supine remains unknown. AIMS: To evaluate diaphragm thickness (t(di)) and shortening in healthy term infants in the prone and supine positions in order to determine whether changes in body position would affect diaphragm resting length and the degree of diaphragm shortening during inspiration. METHODS: In 16 healthy term infants, diaphragm thickness at the level of the zone of apposition on the right side was measured using ultrasonography. Heart rate (HR), breathing frequency (f), and transcutaneous oxyhaemoglobin saturation (SaO(2)) were recorded simultaneously during diaphragm imaging with the infants in the supine and prone positions during quiet sleep. RESULTS: At end expiratory (EEV) and at end inspiratory lung volumes (EIV), t(di) increased significantly in the prone position. The change in t(di) during tidal breathing was also greater when the infant was prone. SaO(2), HR, and f were not significantly different at EEV and at EIV in both positions. CONCLUSION: In healthy term infants, placed in the prone position, the diaphragm is significantly thicker and, therefore, shorter, both at EEV and EIV. Diaphragm shortening during tidal breathing is greater when the infant is prone. In the prone position, the decreased diaphragm resting length would impair diaphragm strength, and the additional diaphragm shortening during tidal breathing represents added work performed by the diaphragm. This may compromise an infant's capacity to respond to stressful situations when placed in the prone position and may contribute to the association of SIDS with prone position.     

Sudden infant death syndrome in South Australia 1968-97. Part I: changes over time

OBJECTIVE: To compare the epidemiology of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) over three consecutive decades. METHODOLOGY: The birth history, infant's developmental and health history, infant care practices for the infant, death scene investigation and autopsy findings for all infants dying suddenly and unexpectedly in South Australia (SA) between January 1968 and December 1997 were studied. RESULTS: The incidence of SIDS in SA rose through the 1970s and early 1980s with the highest incidence being in infants born in 1986 at 2.4 per 1000 live births (LB). Two factors felt to be dangerous for some infants were identified being left unobserved in the prone position and having the head covered by bed clothes. Publicity about the risk of prone sleeping has been accompanied by a fall in SIDS deaths, to an incidence of 0.5 per 1000 LB in 1997. The incidence in Aboriginal infants, and infants living in lower socio-economic conditions has always been high, but the over-representation of these groups has increased in the last 5 years. CONCLUSION: It no infant under 8 months of age was placed prone or was able to get to prone unobserved before the age when they can easily get back to supine, and no infant was able to get the head completely covered while unobserved, the incidence of SIDS in SA should fall below 0.2 per 1000 LB.     

Prematurity,sleeping position and sudden infant death syndrome

Preterm birth and prone sleeping position significantly increase the risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). The reduced incidence of SIDS with supine sleeping has been well publicised, yet some prematurely born infants are slept prone at the high-risk age for SIDS. This may reflect inadequate educational targeting of high-risk groups and/or concerns about possible adverse effects of supine sleeping. In addition, parents may receive mixed messages about sleeping positions, as they witness their prematurely born infants being nursed prone on neonatal units, often for many weeks. In the neonatal period, the prone position improves oxygenation, tidal volume and compliance of preterm infants with respiratory distress. The limited data available suggest prone positioning is also beneficial for convalescent, preterm infants. Thus, it is not clear when the advantages of prone sleeping cease. Studies are required to determine when supine sleeping for prematurely born infants can safely be recommended and hence an unambiguous message given to parents.     

Arterial oxygen saturation in infants at risk of sudden death: influence of sleeping position

To study the possible influence of sleeping position on arterial oxygen saturation, measured by pulse oximetry (Sp6₂), 7–h overnight recordings of breathing movements and ECG were performed in 43 infants (median age 2.4 months, range 0.2–11 months) at increased risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). Infants were randomly allocated to start sleeping either in their usual sleeping position or in the opposite position. After 3.5 h, all infants were gently turned over. Thus, each infant served as their own control. Recordings were analysed for sleep time, baseline Sp0₂ (only during regular breathing), and the number and duration of desaturations (a decrease in Sp0₂ to ≤80%). In the prone position, a significantly higher proportion of time was spent asleep (median 79% versus 70%; p < 0.05). Median baseline Sp0₂ was 98.8% (91.7–100%) in the prone and 99.0% (92.0–100%) in the supine position (ns). A total of 191 desaturations were found in 29 recordings; 96 in the prone and 95 in the supine position (ns). One infant subsequently died of SIDS while sleeping in the prone position. He had a relatively high number of desaturations (n = 12) which all occurred in the prone position. These results confirm earlier studies which could not find a significant influence of sleeping position on baseline oxygenation. The occurrence of desaturations in the prone position only in the infant who subsequently died requires further investigation.     

Why is there an increased risk for sudden infant death in prone sleeping? Fear paralysis and atrial stretch reflexes implicated?

Kaada B. Why is there an increased risk for sudden infant death in prone sleeping? Fear paralysis and atrial stretch reflexes implicated. Acta Prediatr 1994;83:548–57. Stockholm. ISSN 0803–5253 A number or recent reports have indicated a higher risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) in the prone sleeping position, compared with the supine position. However, the biological mechanisms for this increased risk have not been established. For this report, two biological explanations are proposed, each of which may be influenced by altered sleeping position in such a way that they may create conditions for increased triggering of SIDS.     

Measures of cardiac repolarization and body position in infants

Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) is the most common cause of death in children between 1 and 6 months of age. Recent data suggest that a prolonged QTc interval on the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is associated with SIDS. Prone body position during sleep is also known to be a risk factor for SIDS; this has prompted the American Academy of Pediatrics to promote the "Back to Sleep" campaign. We postulated that the QTc interval in infants might change as a function of body position, linking the observations relating body position and QTc interval to SIDS. We recorded ECGs in a group of infants in both the supine and prone position to determine if the QTc interval and QT dispersion differ between the 2 positions. Forty-seven standard 12-lead EGGs and high-amplitude, rapid-sweep 12-lead EGGs were performed on 45 healthy infants (mean age 26 +/- 40 days) in both the supine and prone positions. The infants were asleep in a quiet, restful state. The ECGs were reviewed by 2 investigators blinded to the position of the infants during recording. Measurements included the average QTc interval (using Bazett's correction) and QT dispersion (the difference between the longest and the shortest QT intervals on a standard 12-lead EKG). The study was designed to detect a 3% difference in QTc interval with 80% power and alpha = 0.05. All subjects had telephone or clinical follow-up at 1 year. The average QTc interval was 403 +/- 20 milliseconds (msec) in the supine position and 405 +/- 27 msec in the prone position (p = NS). The QT dispersion was 20 +/- 12 msec in the supine position and 22 +/- 13 msec in the prone position (p = NS). One infant in the study group died of SIDS at the age of 3 months. The EGG of this patient revealed a QTc interval of 382 msec in the supine position and 407 msec in the prone position; the QT dispersion was 34 msec in the supine position and 34 msec in the prone position. We found no difference in QTc interval or QT dispersion as a function of body position in healthy infants resting quietly. Prolongation of the QTc interval is unlikely to explain the increased risk for SIDS associated with prone body position in the general population of healthy infants, unless patients with long QT syndrome are somehow more influenced by body position than normal patients are.     

Circadian variations in sudden infant death syndrome: associations with maternal smoking, sleeping position and infections. The Nordic Epidemiological SIDS Study

AIM: To study circadian variation in the sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) and possible associations with risk factors for SIDS. METHODS: A questionnaire-based case-control study matched for place of birth, age and gender was conducted in Denmark, Norway and Sweden: The Nordic Epidemiological SIDS Study. The study comprised 244 SIDS victims and 869 control infants between September 1992 and August 1995. The main outcome was hour found dead. RESULTS: A significant circadian pattern was observed among the 242 SIDS victims with a known hour found dead, with a peak at 08.00-08.59 in the morning (n = 33). Of the SIDS victims, 12% were found dead at 00.00-05.59, 58% at 06.00-11.59, 21% at 12.00-17.59 and 9.0% at 18.00-23.59. When comparing night/morning SIDS and day/evening SIDS (found dead 00.00-11.59 and 12.00-23.59, respectively), the proportion of night/morning SIDS was high among infants of smoking mothers (81% vs 53%, p < 0.001), infants with a reported cold (82% vs 64%, p = 0.007) and infants sleeping side/supine (81% vs 60%, p < 0.001). No associations were observed between hour found dead and other sociodemographic risk factors for SIDS. Risk (odds ratio and 95% confidence interval) of night/morning SIDS and day/evening SIDS was 7.0 (4.5-10.9) and 1.5 (0.8-2.5), respectively, for maternal smoking, 2.2 (1.5-3.1) and 0.6 (0.3-1.3), respectively, if the infant had a reported cold, 3.7 (2.1-6.6) and 3.1 (1.1-8.4), respectively, if the infant was put to sleep in the side position (supine reference), and 11.0 (5.9-20.2) and 21.6 (7.6-60.8), respectively, if the infant was put to sleep in the prone position. CONCLUSION: The observed higher proportion of night/morning cases in SIDS if the mother smoked, if the infant was reported to have a cold and if the infant was sleeping side/supine may contribute to the understanding of some epidemiological characteristics of SIDS.     

Prone versus supine sleep position: a review of the physiological studies in SIDS research

A number of physiological studies, published over the last 10 years, have investigated the links between prone sleeping and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). This review evaluates those studies and derives an overview of the different affects of sleeping prone or supine in infancy. Generally, compared with the supine, the prone position raises arousal and wakening thresholds, promotes sleep and reduces autonomic activity through decreased parasympathetic activity, decreased sympathetic activity or an imbalance between the two systems. In addition, resting ventilation and ventilatory drive is improved in preterm infants, but in older infants (>1 month), there is no improvement in ventilation, and in 3-month-old infants, the position is adverse in terms of poorer ventilatory drive (in active sleep only). The majority of findings suggest a reduction in physiological control related to respiratory, cardiovascular and autonomic control mechanisms, including arousal during sleep in the prone position. Since the majority of these findings are from studies of healthy infants, continued reinforcement of the supine sleep recommendations for all infants is emphasized.     

Changing infants' sleep position increases risk of sudden infant death syndrome. New Zealand Cot Death Study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether the prone sleeping position may increase the risk for sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), particularly in infants unused to prone sleep. DESIGN: A 3-year (1987-1990) case-control study. SETTING: Nationwide study in New Zealand. SUBJECTS: Four hundred eighty-five infants who died of SIDS and 1800 controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Infants were classified as unaccustomed to prone if their usual sleep position was nonprone and they were placed prone for the last sleep. Secondary prone was used to describe infants placed nonprone but found prone. RESULTS: Infants usually and last placed nonprone were at the lowest risk for SIDS (odds ratio [OR], 1.0); those usually and last placed prone were at increased risk (adjusted OR, 4.6; 95% confidence interval, 3.4-6.3). Risk was greatly increased among infants unaccustomed to the prone position (adjusted OR, 19.3; 95% confidence interval, 8.2-44.8). These infants accounted for 8% (31/ 386) of all SIDS deaths. Ninety percent (28/ 31) of infants in this group were found prone, and 71% (20/28) of those found prone were found with their faces turned down into bedding-a position in which asphyxia has been implicated as a mechanism of death. In addition, 138 infants who died of SIDS were last placed nonprone. Forty-seven infants (34%) in this group were found prone (secondary prone), and 60% (28/47) of those found prone were found with their faces turned down into the bedding. This group accounted for 12% of all SIDS deaths. Most of these infants (91% [43/47]) were usually placed nonprone. CONCLUSIONS: Infants placed supine to sleep were at the lowest risk of SIDS, which supports the recommendation that this is the preferred sleeping position for healthy infants. In New Zealand, 20% of SIDS deaths involved lack of experience with the prone sleeping position. Our findings suggest the possibility that an infant's competence in escaping from potentially lethal situations during prone sleep (eg, the face-down position) may be impaired by inexperience in prone sleeping. Great caution should be exercised in placing infants unaccustomed to the prone sleeping position in the prone position.     

SIDS risk factors and factors associated with prone sleeping in Sweden.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the current prevalence of risk factors for sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) in Sweden with a decade earlier, and assess factors associated with prone sleeping. METHODS: The results of a cohort study (Infants of Western Sweden) and a population based case-control study (Nordic Epidemiological SIDS Study) were examined. Subjects were 5600 healthy 6 month old infants born in 2003 in the Western Sweden region and 430 healthy Swedish infants born between 1991 and 1995. RESULTS: Prone sleeping decreased from 31.8% to 5.6% and supine sleeping increased from 35.3% to 47.3%. Side or side/supine sleeping increased from 25.2% to 43.8%. Maternal smoking during pregnancy decreased from 23.5% to 9.5%. The risk for prone sleeping increased if the mother was unemployed (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.5 to 4.0), if she was a heavy smoker in the third trimester (OR 44.1, 95% CI 1.6 to 1199.6), and if the child was irritable (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.3 to 5.1), shared a bedroom with siblings (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.0 to 6.6), or never used a dummy (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.9 to 5.4). CONCLUSIONS: Parents have complied with advice to prevent SIDS given at infant welfare centres for the last 10 years. A change in the preferred sleeping position from side variants to exclusively supine, and reducing the number of pregnant women smoking may be beneficial. Use of a prone sleeping position was associated with maternal employment status, maternal smoking, temperament of the child, dummy use, and sharing a bedroom with siblings.     

Reduced arousals following obstructive apneas in infants sleeping prone

A decreased arousability and an increased risk for sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) have been shown in infants sleeping prone. Obstructive apnea, a known risk factor for SIDS, is less often terminated by an arousal reaction in infants than in adults. The effect of body position on the arousal reaction to spontaneous respiratory events had not been previously studied in infants. The aim of our study was to see if body position has an influence on the frequency and delay of the arousal reaction to obstructive apnea. All obstructive events recorded during two successive nights in 20 infants sleeping one night prone and one night supine were studied. During the supine recording 153 obstructive events were detected, and 217 were detected during the prone session. Prone sleep was not associated with an increased frequency of obstructive apneas. Total sleep time was 382 min (range, 283-456) supine and 423 min (range, 325-521) prone (p = 0.003). Obstructive events duration was 6.5 s (range, 3-21.5) when sleeping supine and 8 s (range, 3.5-30.5) when prone (p = 0.002). Behavioral arousal were found in 57.5 % of obstructive events recorded supine and in 31.3 % of those seen prone (p < 0.001). Arousal occurred after 8 s (range, 0-21) from the start of the obstructions when supine and 10.5 s (range, 3.5-23.5) when prone (p = 0.001). Sighs were found in 34 % of supine obstructive events and in 44.7 % of those prone (p = 0.040). A reaction, i.e. arousal or sigh, was found in 91.5 % of supine events and 76 % of those prone (p < 0.001). We conclude that when sleeping supine, infants arouse to obstructive events more often and after shorter delay than when prone.     

Determinants of infant sleep position in an urban population

The incidence of SIDS has decreased by 40% since the Back to Sleep campaign was initiated. However, the rate of SIDS in the District of Columbia continues to be approximately double the national rate. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and determinants of prone sleeping among infants in the District of Columbia and to ascertain what information is being provided to parents by health care professionals by a cross-sectional survey of parents of infants 0-6 months of age presenting for well child care at Children's Health Center, Children's National Medical Center, in Washington, DC. We recruited a consecutive sample of 126 parent-infant pairs, of which 92.9% were African-American. The average infant was 73 days old, was 3,003 grams at birth, and was full term. When asked how the infants were placed for sleep the night before the interview, 34.1 % of parents had placed the infant supine, 50.8% side, and 15.1% prone. Nearly half (48%) of infants slept in an adult bed with the mother. More than one third of the infants had been placed prone for sleep at least once since hospital discharge. Most common reasons for sleeping supine included SIDS risk reduction or health care professional advice. Side sleepers did so primarily because of concern about vomiting, health care provider advice, or SIDS. Infants were placed prone primarily because the infant slept better. When asked about information received from a health care provider, 70.6% of parents stated that they had received information about sleep position and 64.3% about the hazards of passive smoking. Eight parents observed nursery personnel placing their infants prone. Only 16.7% of the total study population had received a Back to Sleep brochure, read it, and recalled that it recommended back sleeping. Infants were more likely to sleep prone if there was a grandparent in the home (OR 2.9, p<0.05) or if they were the firstborn (OR 2.17, p<0.05). Infants were more likely to sleep supine if parents had heard a back recommendation from a health care professional (OR 5.7, p<0.001). Infants were least likely to sleep supine if the parents had heard a side or a side/back recommendation (OR 0.26, p=0.001). Infant sleep position was not ter, reading the Back to Sleep brochure. In conclusion, more than one third (35.7%) of infants in this predominantly African-American population have been placed prone for sleep at least once; 15% slept prone the night before the interview. Almost one third of parents received no information about sleep position, but parents receiving a verbal supine recommendation were most likely to place their infant supine. Receiving written information did not affect sleep position. Improved educational efforts for parents of African-American newborns should continue to focus on encouraging supine positioning, smoke cessation, and other safe sleep practices.     

Stop SIDS--sleeping solitary supine, sucking soother, stopping smoking substitutes

The recognition of prone sleeping and maternal smoking as modifiable risk factors for sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), has drastically decreased SIDS incidence. However, during the last years other factors have become necessary to consider to further reduce the risk of SIDS. Side sleeping implies a greater risk than supine sleeping but is still common. Bed sharing may increase the risk of SIDS, while use of a pacifier seems to be protective. Replacement of maternal smoking with nicotine substitutes is not harmless.

Conclusion: To further reduce the risk of SIDS, exclusive supine sleeping should be encouraged and side sleeping discouraged. When the breast-feeding is established, a pacifier can very well be used at bedtime. Bed sharing can increase the risk of SIDS if the infant is below 2-3 months of age, especially if the mother is a smoker. Any nicotine use should be avoided during pregnancy and breast-feeding.     

Child care practices and the sudden infant death syndrome

Southern New Zealand has one of the highest reported rates of the sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) in the world. Data were collected on 49 infants who died from SIDS in the Dunedin and Invercargill Health Districts of southern New Zealand. Forty-two of the families were interviewed at home following the loss of their infant. In the week prior to death, 17 infants (40%) had an upper respiratory tract infection, although in 11 of these infants their infection had apparently resolved at least 24 h prior to death. Thirty infants (71%) had their faces down into the bedding or their heads covered with bedding. Thirty-four infants (81%) were found dead in the prone position, whereas 49% of New Zealand infants aged 3 months would be expected to sleep prone. Sleep position and the terminal position of the head in relation to SIDS requires further study.     

Risk factors for sudden infant death syndrome following the prevention campaign in New Zealand: a prospective study

OBJECTIVES: To identify the risk factors for sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) following a national campaign to prevent SIDS. METHODS: For 2 years (October 1, 1991 through September 30, 1993) data were collected by community child health nurses on all infants born in New Zealand at initial contact and at 2 months. RESULTS: There were 232 SIDS cases in the postneonatal age group (2.0/1000 live births) and these were compared with 1200 randomly selected control subjects. Information was available for 127 cases (54.7%) and 922 (76.8%) of controls. The previously identified modifiable risk factors were examined. The prevalence of prone sleeping position of the infant was very low (0.7% at initial contact and 3. 0% at 2 months), but was still associated with an increased risk of SIDS. In addition, the side sleeping position was also found to have an increased risk of SIDS compared with the supine sleeping position (at 2 months: adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 6.57; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.71, 25.23). Maternal smoking was found to be the major risk factor for SIDS. Bed sharing was also associated with an increased risk of SIDS. There was an interaction between maternal smoking and bed sharing on the risk of SIDS. Compared with infants not exposed to either bed sharing or maternal smoking, the adjusted OR for infants of mothers who smoked was 5.01 (95% CI = 2.01, 12.46) for bed sharing at the initial contact and 5.02 (95% CI = 1.05, 24. 05) for bed sharing at 2 months. In this study breastfeeding was not associated with a statistically significant reduction in the risk of SIDS. The other risk factors for SIDS identified were: unmarried mother, leaving school at a younger age, young mother, greater number of previous pregnancies, late attendance for antenatal care, smoking in pregnancy, male infant, Maori ethnicity, low birth weight, and shorter gestation. CONCLUSIONS: After adjustment for potential confounders, prone and side sleeping positions, maternal smoking, and the joint exposure to bed sharing and maternal smoking were associated with statistically significant increased risk of SIDS. A change from the side to the supine sleeping position could result in a substantial reduction in SIDS. Maternal smoking is common in New Zealand and with the reduction in the prevalence of prone sleeping position is now the major risk factor in this country. However, smoking behavior has been difficult to change. Bed sharing is also a major factor but appears only to be a risk to infants of mothers who smoke. Addressing bed sharing among mothers who smoke could reduce SIDS by at least one third. Breastfeeding did not appear to offer a statistically significant reduction in SIDS risk after adjustment of potential confounders, but as breastfeeding rates are comparatively good in New Zealand, this result should be interpreted with caution as the power of this study to detect a benefit is small.     

The healthy human infant tends to sleep in the prone rather than the supine position

There are few reports about developmental behavior relating to roll over among healthy infants. We assessed the relationship between the placed position on sleeping and altered sleeping position the next morning by roll over among healthy infants. A health check-up clinic distributed a total of 1626 questionnaires to parents whose infant's ages are 1.5 years (or 18 months) old. The age at the first roll over and the change in sleeping position the next morning after they started to roll over, were investigated. The mean age of roll over from the supine to the prone among infants who were placed mainly in the prone sleeping position, at least in the first week of life, was 4.0 months (S.D., 1.1). The mean age of roll over from the supine to the prone among infants who were placed mainly in the supine sleeping position during early neonatal life and thereafter was 4.4 months (S.D., 1.2). The age of the first roll over from supine to prone was significantly younger in infants who were placed mainly in the prone sleeping position during early neonatal life. Among 651 infants who had been placed supine, 34.7% were found prone by roll over the next morning. Among 211 infants who had been placed prone, 14.2% were found supine by roll over the next morning. The number of infants who rolled over from supine to prone position was statistically greater than those from prone to supine. It is likely that the healthy human infant tends to sleep in the prone rather than the supine position. The finding is especially important for the correct assessment of the position in which SIDS cases were found dead.