择区性颈清扫术在临床N0舌鳞状细胞癌治疗中的应用

目的比较择区性颈清扫术(selective neck dissection，SND)与经典性或改良性颈清扫术(radical neck dissection，RND)在治疗舌鳞状细胞癌颈淋巴结临床阴性(cN0)患者中的效果。方法将1998年1月-2002年12月之间采用肩胛舌骨肌上颈清扫术(Ⅰ～Ⅲ区)14例及Ⅰ～Ⅳ区清扫19例(SND组)共33例与1980年1月-1997年12月之间112例采用经典性或改良性颈清扫术(RND组)的病例，根据T分期、综合治疗方式和淋巴结病理情况进行随机配对分析。Kaplan—Meier方法计算复发率和颈部淋巴结复发或生存趋势。结果RND组5年颈部复发率为9．1％(3例)，SND组5年同侧颈部复发率12．1％(4例)；两组的5年生存率分别是78．8％和82．9％(分别为26例和28例)。Ⅰ-Ⅲ区清扫组5年颈部复发率为21．2％(3例)，清扫野外复发率为14．3％(2例)；Ⅰ-Ⅳ区清扫组5年同侧颈部复发率5．3％(1例)，清扫野外复发率为0。结论与经典性或改良性颈清扫术相比，择区性颈清扫术并不影响cN0舌癌患者的肿瘤治疗效果，术式以Ⅰ～Ⅳ区清扫为适宜。     

舌活动部鳞癌颈淋巴结阴性（cN0）的处理

目的：通过分析舌活动部鳞癌病人临床检查颈淋巴结阴性（cN0)的隐匿性淋巴结转移在颈部各区的分布，显示舌活动部鳞癌的淋巴结转移规律，并指导舌活动部鳞癌cN0的分区性颈淋巴清扫的范围。方法：回顾分析33例cN0的舌活动部鳞癌行选择性全颈淋巴结清扫和挽救性颈淋巴结清扫术的病例，分析手术后病理阳性淋巴结（pN^ )在颈部各区的分布。结果：病理证实单个淋巴结转移14例，其中Ⅰ区淋巴结转移3例，Ⅱ区淋巴结转移7例，Ⅲ区淋巴结转移4例，Ⅳ区和Ⅴ区未见淋巴结转移，多个淋巴结转移19例，各区转移频率分别为：Ⅰ区27.45%,Ⅱ区39.22%，Ⅲ区31.37%,Ⅳ区0%，Ⅴ区1.96%。结论：舌活动部鳞癌cN0的颈部处理没有必要采用经典性全颈清扫术，建议行肩胛舌骨肌上的分区性清扫，即Ⅰ区清扫 Ⅱ区清扫 Ⅲ区清扫即可，避免全颈清术给患者造成的术后损害。     

颈清扫术在临床Ⅰ期舌鳞状细胞癌患者中的疗效评价

目的探讨颈清扫在临床Ⅰ期（cT1NOM0期）舌鳞状细胞癌（简称鳞癌）治疗中的作用。方法回顾性分析1984年11月-1999年11月130例临床Ⅰ期舌活动部鳞癌患者的临床病理资料，该组患者的治疗方式以手术为主，3l例（23．8％）只行原发灶手术，99例行原发灶手术加颈清扫术，包括择区性颈清扫（Ⅰ-Ⅲ区或Ⅰ～Ⅳ区颈清扫）20例和全颈清扫（Ⅰ～Ⅴ区颈清扫）79例。结果术后病理证实颈清扫组的隐匿淋巴结率为12．0％（12／99）。全组病例随访5年以上，单纯行原发灶手术组、原发灶手术加择区性颈清扫组和原发灶手术加全颈清扫组的颈部控制失败率分别为25．8％（8／31）、15．0％（3／20）和7．6％（6／79）。单纯原发灶手术组和颈清扫组之间的颈部控制失败率差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。3组手术后总体生存率差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。结论颈清扫术可能提高临床Ⅰ期舌鳞癌患者的颈部控制率，本研究未能证实颈清扫术能降低其远处转移率以及能提高其生存率。是否需要对所有临床。     

舌鳞状细胞癌颈部淋巴结转移的治疗

目的 分析舌鳞状细胞癌颈部淋巴结转移性的分布规律,探讨舌鳞状细胞癌cN0患者的颈部处理。方法 回顾性分析1975年1月-2000年12月初次在我院诊治的329例舌鳞状细胞癌患者的临床资料。cN0 179例,cN1 131例,cN2＋3 19例（2例出现双侧颈淋巴结转移）。在cN0患者中,肩胛舌骨肌上清扫或单纯颔下清扫20例,根治性颈清扫93例,扩大的肩胛舌骨上（包括Ⅳ区）清扫8例。在cN1患者中,30例接受颈部单纯放疗;肩胛舌骨肌上清扫6例,根治性颈清扫94例,扩大的肩胛舌骨上清扫1例。所有cN2＋3患者均行根治性颈清扫。结果 舌鳞状细胞癌颈部淋巴结隐性转移率为8．3％（10／121）,其中T1为1．3％（1／76）,T2为4．3％（4／93）,T3为44．4％（4／9）,T4 100％（1／1）。实际颈部淋巴结转移率为71．7％（81／113）。91例患者组织学检查发现颈清扫标本中淋巴结转移阳性,Ⅰ区淋巴结转移占39．6％（36／91）、Ⅱ区71．4％（65／91）、Ⅲ区19．8％（18／91）和Ⅳ区8．8％（8／91）。有2例患者发生对侧Ⅰ、Ⅱ和Ⅳ区的淋巴结转移。在cN0患者中,颈部单纯放疗的同侧颈部复发率为7．5％（3／40）,综合治疗为7．5％（6／80）,单纯手术为2．4％（1／41）,等待观察为16．7％（3／18）;颈部单纯放疗的5年生存率分别为42.0％,综合治疗为55．6％,单纯手术为79．6％,等待观察为48．6％。结论 Ⅱ区是舌鳞状细胞癌最易转移的部位,不主张对所有cN0患者实施择区性颈清扫,对T3和T4患者可考虑扩大的肩胛舌骨肌上清扫（Ⅰ～Ⅳ）。     

头颈部鳞癌颈淋巴结隐匿性转移

目的探讨头颈部鳞癌隐匿性颈淋巴结转移的特点和规律。方法对111例头颈部鳞癌N0M0患者的颈淋巴结清扫标本进行切片观察。结果隐匿性转移总体发生率为26．12％(29／111)。其中口腔癌18．75％(15／80)，口咽癌25．00％(1／4)，下咽癌54．54％(6／11)，喉癌43．75％(7／16)。原发癌临床分期、肿瘤细胞分化程度是影响颈淋巴结隐匿性转移的重要因素。111例N0M0患者5年生存率为66．7％，其中pN^-为74．39％(61／82)，pN^ 为44．82％(13／29)。结论对临床T3和T4期、癌组织分化程度低和深度浸润的cN0头颈部鳞癌应行选择性颈清扫术以治疗颈淋巴结隐匿性转移并提高患者的生存率。     

颈清扫术治疗晚期颈转移癌的远期效果及复发相关因素分析

目的 探讨颈清扫术治疗晚期颈转移癌的远期效果及术后颈部复发的相关影响因素。方法 对112例接受全颈清扫手术的头颈部鳞状细胞癌N2、N3患者，利用手术标本病理检查及随访资料进行回顾性分析。结果 晚期颈转移癌全颈清扫术后5年颈部复发率为27．7％(31／112)，其中N2、N3患者的术后5年颈部复发率分别为16．5％(13／79)、54．5％(18／33)。31例全颈清扫术颈部复发患者，Kaplan-Meier法统计术后3年生存率、5年生存率分别为16．1％(5／31)、9．7％(3／31)。单因素χ^2分析显示，临床N分期、病理颈淋巴结大小、转移淋巴结包膜外扩散、颈部非淋巴组织结构受侵情况与术后颈部复发有关。多因素Logistic回归分析结果表明，仅病理检查颈淋巴结大小与术后颈部复发明显相关。结论 颈部复发是晚期颈转移癌患者最常见的术后肿瘤复发原因。转移颈淋巴结大小是全颈清扫术后颈部复发根本和决定性影响因素。而临床N分期、转移淋巴结包膜外扩散、颈部非淋巴组织结构受侵情况对全颈清扫术后颈部复发具有重要影响。     

舌体癌的手术治疗方法探讨

目的：回顾性总结我科1988年至1995年间舌体鳞癌手术治疗经验，探讨舌体鳞癌手术治疗方法相关问题。材料与方法；入选病例为1988年5月-1995年6月我科住院初治舌体鳞状细胞癌共185例，男102例，女82例，年龄28-88岁，临床分期；Ⅰ-Ⅱ期72例，Ⅲ-Ⅳ期113例，所有病例均行原发灶手术切除 颈淋巴清扫术，原发灶手术切除术后缺损及下颌骨体部处理根据不同情况采用不同术式，cN0148例行选择性颈淋巴清扫术，cN1-337例行治疗性根治性颈淋巴清扫术，结果：185例中177例获5年随访，随访率95.68%。185例舌体鳞癌5年生存率为72.43%。已死亡43例中，因肿瘤局部复发30例，淋巴转移7例，远处转移5例，其它1例，舌体缺损修复；未修复者42例，用前臂皮瓣修复117例，胸大肌皮瓣修复26例，下颌骨体部处理；未切除者92例，方块切除75例，下颌骨体部部分切除18例，185例颈淋巴转移率为29.19%，cN0者颈淋巴pN^ 转移机率为19.59%，结论：舌体鳞癌行下颌骨体部切除者适用于癌肿已侵犯口底颌舌沟舌侧粘骨膜者，舌体鳞癌舌体缺损小于1/3时可不修复，大于1/2者可应用前臂皮瓣，大于2/3者行胸大肌肌皮瓣修复，cN0选择性颈清扫术，T1者颈部严密观察，T2行肩胛舌骨上清扫术，T3-4者行功能性颈清术，已超越中线的cN0T3-4患者可作双侧功能性颈清扫术，但不同期行双侧根治性颈清扫术。     

颈分区性清扫术治疗头颈部鳞状细胞癌的远期疗效

目的 研究颈分区性清扫术在头颈部鳞状细胞癌(简称鳞癌)治疗中的效果。方法 回顾性分析1997年1月～2001年12月在中国医学科学院肿瘤医院接受分区性清扫术的头颈部鳞癌患者123例，其中喉癌77例、口腔癌29例、口咽癌2例、下咽癌15例。分区性清扫术后发现淋巴结病理阴性(pNO)99例，淋巴结病理阳性(pN )24例。随访时间中位数为25个月。结果 101例cNO患者行分区性清扫术后发现pN 14例(13．9％)；22例cN 患者行分区性清扫术后发现pN 10例(45．5％)。157侧分区性清扫标本中共发现52枚阳性淋巴结，其在颈部的分布如下：I区25％，Ⅱ区48％，Ⅲ区25％，Ⅳ区2％。根据Kaplan—Meier方法计算5年颈部复发率，pNO患者为5．87％(95％可信区间0．8％，10．9％)，pN 患者为9．2％(95％可信区间0．0％，21．5％)。结论 颈分区性清扫术从微创观念出发，只要选择恰当，对于头颈部鳞癌患者可以取得与传统颈清扫术相当的效果。更重要的是保留了患者的功能和外观，提高了生活质量。     

肩胛舌骨肌上颈清扫术在临床N0口腔癌治疗中的应用

目的探讨肩胛舌骨肌上颈清扫术在口腔癌治疗中的应用价值。方法对27例临床N0(T1~3)口腔鳞状细胞癌患者行肩胛舌骨肌上颈清扫,清扫范围为第Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ区淋巴结。记录颈清扫手术时间、术后淋巴结病理检查结果、术后肩功能及随访结果。结果手术时间平均(x±s)为(16±02)h。术后病理检查证实5例出现颈淋巴转移(19%),转移发生于第Ⅰ区2例(7%)、第Ⅱ区4例(15%),其中1例同时存在第Ⅰ、Ⅱ区转移。肩功能在术后3个月内基本恢复。术后随访2~4年,随访率100%,未见原发灶复发及颈淋巴转移。结论肩胛舌骨肌上颈清扫术是临床颈部N0口腔癌的合适术式,它既能达到治疗目的,又能最大程度地保留肩颈部外形与功能。     

颈侧清扫术

正颈淋巴结清扫术是治疗头颈肿瘤颈淋巴结转移的重要方法,能够有效提高头颈肿瘤的治疗效果。颈择区性清扫术是颈淋巴结清扫术的常用术式,依据清扫区域不同可分为颈肩胛舌骨肌上清扫术、颈肩胛舌骨肌上扩大清扫术、颈侧清扫术、颈后侧清扫术、颈中央区清扫术,需依据原发肿瘤部位及T分期、淋巴结N分期不同,采取不同的颈侧清扫术策略。我们将结合手术视频说明颈侧清扫术(Ⅱ-Ⅳ区)的基本手术方法。     

Levels II and III neck dissection for larynx cancer with N0 neck

The removal of level II, III, and IV metastases has gained importance in the treatment of squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) of the neck and larynx. This study assessed the possibility of removing level II and level III metastases only, given the low likelihood of occurrence of metastatic lymph nodes on level IV in SCCs of the larynx.ObjectiveThis study aimed to analyze the prevalence rates of metastatic lymph nodes on level IV in laryngeal SCC patients.MethodsThis prospective study enrolled consecutive patients with laryngeal SCC submitted to neck lymph node dissection. Neck levels were identified and marked for future histopathology testing.ResultsSix percent (3/54) of the necks had level IV metastatic lymph nodes. All cN0 necks (42) were free from level IV metastasis. Histopathology testing done in the cN (+) necks (12) revealed that 25% of the level IV specimens were positive for SCC. The difference between cN0 and cN (+) necks was statistically significant (p = 0.009). Level IV metastases never occurred in isolation, and were always associated with level II or level III involvement (p = 0.002).ConclusionThe prevalence rate for lymph node metastasis in cN0 necks was 0%. Level IV metastatic lymph nodes were correlated to cN (+) necks. Level IV metastasis was associated with the presence of metastatic lymph nodes in levels II or III.     

Treatment of contralateral N0 neck in early squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue: elective neck dissection versus observation

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Prophylactic treatment of contralateral N0 neck in early squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oral tongue is a controversial issue. The aim of this study was to analyze the rates of occult metastases and their prognostic effects in stage I and stage II SCC of the oral tongue, and to compare the results of elective neck dissection to observation of the contralateral N0 neck in the treatment of these patients. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 54 patients who were treated at Severance Hospital from 1992 to 2003 and had been diagnosed with stage I or stage II SCC of the oral tongue and had not received prior treatment. All patients underwent an ipsilateral elective neck dissection simultaneously with the primary lesion. The management of the contralateral N0 necks involved "watchful waiting" in 29 patients and elective neck dissection in 25 patients. Surgical treatment was followed by radiotherapy in 20 patients. Of these, seven patients belonged to the "observation" group who did not receive contralateral elective neck dissection. The follow-up period ranged from 3 to 110 months, with a mean of 56.3 months. Data were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, the log-rank test, and the chi(2) test. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (28%, 15 of 54) had occult metastases. Of these, 14 patients (26%, 14 of 54) had ipsilateral pathologic metastases. The remaining case (4%, 1 of 25) had the only contralateral level II occult neck metastasis without ipsilateral metastasis. Disease recurred in 17 of 54 patients (31%). Of these, eight cases (47%, 8 of 17) had regional recurrences. All regional recurrences developed in the ipsilateral neck; there were no cases of contralateral neck recurrence. The 5-year actuarial disease-free survival rates were 82% for the "observation" group and 68% for the elective neck dissection group. This difference was not statistically significant (P = .182). The 5-year actuarial disease-free survival rates were 83% for the "observation" group when those patients who underwent radiotherapy were excluded (n = 22) and 68% for the elective supraomohyoid neck dissection group (n = 25), which showed no statistically significant difference (P = .127). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that ipsilateral elective neck management is indicated for stage I and II SCC of the oral tongue. On the other hand, our series suggests that contralateral occult lymph node metastasis was unlikely in early-stage oral tongue SCC, and that there was no survival benefit for patients who underwent elective neck dissection in place of observation. Thus, it may not harmful to observe the contralateral N0 neck in the treatment of early oral tongue cancer.     

Management of the N0 neck in patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma

Abstract

Background: Neck lymph node status is the chief prognostic index in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), yet the management of a clinically negative neck in this setting is still controversial, especially in patients with laryngeal SCC (LSCC).

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of selective neck dissection (SND) to control occult disease in patients with LSCC and clinically negative (cN0) necks.

Materials and methods: Medical records of 1476 patients with cN0 LSCC were analyzed. In conjunction with primary treatment, 126 (8.5%) underwent at least unilateral elective neck dissection, whereas most 1350 (91.5%) followed a wait-and-see protocol. Prognostic significance was indicated by the Kaplan–Meier survival estimates.

Results: The rate of occult neck disease was 15%. Five-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 74.4% and 66.7%, respectively. Prognosis was closely related to T stage, preoperative tracheotomy, and postoperative recurrence. There was no significant correlation with age, sex, or preoperative neck dissection; but in patients with supraglottic LSCC, the relation between prognosis and preoperative neck dissection was significant, with fewer neck and local recurrences than the wait-and-see group (p?<?.05).

Conclusions and significance: Selective neck dissection is serving as an accurate prognostic tool in patients with supraglottic laryngeal cancers.     

Indications for and extent of elective neck dissection for lymph node metastasis from external auditory canal carcinoma

ObjectivesWe aim to clarify the frequency of lymph node metastasis of external auditory canal (EAC) carcinoma, including susceptible locations, adequate extent of elective neck dissection, and the relationship between the tumor infiltration site and lymph node metastasis.Patients and MethodsFrom 2003 to 2018, 63 patients with EAC carcinoma at Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital were enrolled in this study. The T and N stages, locations of clinically positive lymph nodes, prognoses, and anatomic site of tumor infiltration were analyzed after treatment.ResultsClinically positive lymph node metastasis (cN+) was detected in 18 patients (28.6%), consisting of T1, T2, T3, and T4 disease in 1 (6%), 2 (22%), 8 (38%), and 7 (41%) patients, respectively. The metastatic locations were at level II in 10 patients, parotid gland nodes in 7, preauricular nodes in 5, level Ib in 3, level Va in 3, level III in 1, and superficial cervical nodes in 1. Neck recurrence was determined in two of 45 patients with clinically negative lymph nodes (cN0), with the metastatic locations being levels II, Ib, and III. Among 18 cN+ cases, neck recurrence was noted in 2 of 9 patients who underwent neck dissection. Neck lesions were found to be manageable in all five patients who underwent docetaxel, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and radiation therapy (TPF-RT). No relationship was noted between the tumor infiltration site and lymph node metastasis among T3/4 canrcinoma patients.ConclusionsElective neck dissection could be indicated only in T3/4 patients with free flap reconstruction. Levels Ib to III are considered appropriate for elective neck dissection in cN0 cases. Levels Ib to III and Va indicated favorable sites, even in cases with metastasis in the parotid gland or preauricular area. Furthermore, TPF-RT could be a useful option even in cN+ cases.     

淋巴转移阳性舌体鳞癌的颈部治疗策略探讨

目的 分析影响淋巴转移阳性(pathologically node positive,pN+)舌体鳞癌患者颈部复发的相关因素和淋巴转移规律,探讨pN+舌体鳞癌的颈部治疗策略.方法 回顾性分析1991年1月至2006年12月期间138例pN+舌体鳞癌患者的临床和随访资料,分析pN+舌体鳞癌颈部转移淋巴结和复发淋巴结的分布规律和pN+舌体鳞癌临床病理因素和治疗方法对颈部复发的影响.结果 全部病例随访2年以上或至患者死亡.Kaplan-Meier法计算3年生存率为46.4%,5年生存率为36.2%.138例共203个分区发生转移,其中同侧Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ区累及频率达94.6%,47例共66个分区出现颈部淋巴结复发,其中同侧Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ区复发频率达77.3%.颈部复发率与pT分期、pN分期、pTNM分期、淋巴结包膜外侵犯有关(P值均＜0.05);当淋巴结有包膜外侵犯时,术后放疗组的颈部复发率低于未放疗组,但差异无统计学意义(P=0.076);不同颈清扫方式间的颈部复发率差异无统计学意义(P值均＞0.05).Cox多因素生存分析显示,pTNM分期和淋巴结包膜外侵犯是影响pN+舌体鳞癌预后的独立危险因素.结论 pT分期、pN分期、pTNM分期、淋巴结包膜外侵犯是影响pN+舌体鳞癌颈部复发的因素;当淋巴结有包膜外侵犯时,术后放疗有可能降低颈部复发率;改良性颈清扫的颈部复发率与经典性颈清扫没有差异,对非淋巴结构无肿瘤侵犯的pN+舌体鳞癌尽量行改良性颈清扫;pN+舌体鳞癌转移和复发淋巴结主要分布在同侧Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ区,择区性颈清扫可应用于pN+舌体鳞癌.     

Immunohistochemical detection of cervical lymph node micrometastases from T2N0 tongue cancer

CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that extensive, multiple cervical micrometastases occurred from an early stage in patients with T2N0 tongue cancer. The presence of micrometastases suggests the necessity of preventive neck dissection for Level I-IV nodes as a radical treatment. OBJECTIVE: Cervical lymph node metastases occur with a relatively high frequency in patients with T2N0 squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue, and control of the metastases greatly influences the prognosis of patients. In this study, micrometastases in the cervical lymph nodes were investigated to clarify the necessity and required extent of preventive neck dissection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We investigated micrometastases in 24 subjects who had previously been diagnosed with T2N0 tongue cancer. We performed immunostaining with anti-cytokeratin antibody cocktail AE1/AE3 of sections of 401 paraffin-embedded lymph nodes obtained from these patients. RESULTS: Micrometastases were observed in 14 patients (58%) and were most abundant in Level II nodes (n=11; 46%). Micrometastases were observed in the Level IV nodes of 3 patients (13%), and upstaging to pN2b occurred in 7 patients (29%).     

Treatment strategy for cervical node metastasis from squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx

The purpose of this study is to ascertain the role of neck surgery and radiation therapy for cervical lymph node metastasis in oropharyngeal cancer patients. We reviewed 217 previously untreated patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx who were treated at the Cancer Institute Hospital in Tokyo between 1971 and 1995. The N stage distribution was; N0: 83(38.2%), N1: 42(19.4%), N2a: 23(10.6%), N2b: 27(12.4%), N2c: 33(15.2%), and N3: 9(4.2%). A predominance of cervical node metastases in level II and III was revealed and there were no skip metastases outside of level II and III. The control rate of cervical metastasis for each N stage was; N0: 96.9%, N1: 90.0%, N2a: 76.5%, N2b: 62.5%, N2c: 50.0%, and N3: 0%. Definitive irradiation provided sufficient treatment for small nodes, when the primary tumor growth was well controlled by radiation therapy. Neck dissection was necessary for more advanced neck metastases. Selective limited neck dissection (level II and III) is recommended for N0 and N1 patients, and modified or classical RND is considered to be better for most cases with N2 and N3.     

Distributions of cervical lymph node metastases in oropharyngeal carcinoma: therapeutic implications for the N0 neck

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate the patterns and distributions of lymph node metastases in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and improve the rationale for elective treatment of N0 neck. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred four patients with oropharyngeal SCC who underwent neck dissection between 1992 and 2003 were analyzed retrospectively. All patients had curative surgery as their initial treatment for the primary tumor and neck. A total of 161 neck dissections on both sides of the neck were performed. Therapeutic dissections were done in 71 and 5 necks and elective neck dissection was done on 33 and 52 necks on the ipsilateral and contralateral sides, respectively. Surgical treatment was followed by postoperative radiotherapy for 78 patients. The follow-up period ranged from 1 to 96 months (mean, 30 months). RESULTS: Of the 161 neck dissection specimens evaluated, 90 (56%) necks were found to have lymph node metastases found by pathologic examination. These consisted of 76 (73% of 104 necks) of the ipsilateral side and 14 (25% of 57 necks) of the contralateral side dissections. The occult metastatic rate was 24% (8 of 33) of ipsilateral neck samples and 21% (11 of 52) of contralateral neck samples. Of the 68 patients who had a therapeutic dissection on the ipsilateral side and had lymphatic metastasis, the incidence rate of level IV and level I metastasis was 37% (25 of 68) and 10% (7 of 68), respectively. Isolated metastasis to level IV occurred on the ipsilateral side in three patients. There were no cases of isolated ipsilateral level I pathologic involvement in an N-positive neck or occult metastasis to this group. The incidence rate of level IV metastasis in patients with ipsilateral nodal metastasis was significantly higher in base of tongue cancer (86% [6 of 7]) compared with tonsillar cancer (34% [20 of 59]) (P=.013). Patients with level IV metastasis had significantly worse 5-year disease-free survival rates than patients with metastasis to other neck levels (54% versus 71%; P=.04). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that elective N0 neck treatment in patients with oropharyngeal SCC, especially base of tongue cancer, should include neck levels II, III, and IV instead of levels I, II, and III.     

Ⅵ区淋巴结在甲状腺乳头状癌颈淋巴转移中的意义

目的 进一步认识Ⅵ区淋巴结在甲状腺乳头状癌(papillary thyroid carcinoma,PTC)颈转移中的地位及PTC患者颈部转移淋巴结的分布特点,为PTC的颈部淋巴结处理提供依据.方法 回顾性总结2002年1月至2004年12月97例病变局限于一侧腺叶的PTC患者的临床资料:72例术前检查为cNO,25例为cN+;32例原发灶长径≤1 cm,65例原发灶长径＞1 cm.术中常规取Ⅲ、Ⅳ区淋巴结做冰冻病理检查,根据淋巴结病理结果、肿瘤原发灶大小及位置决定颈部淋巴结的清扫范围.Ⅲ、Ⅳ区淋巴转移患者行包括Ⅵ区的改良性颈清扫;伴有肿瘤包膜外侵患者行双侧Ⅵ区清扫;原发灶长径≤1 cm行患侧Ⅵ区清扫;原发灶长径＞1 cm行双侧Ⅵ区清扫.结果 97例患者行Ⅵ区清扫122侧,45.1%(55/122)发生淋巴转移.72例cN0患者45.8%(33/72)发生Ⅵ区淋巴转移,25例cN+患者76.0%(19/25)发生Ⅵ区淋巴转移,差异有统计学意义(x2=6.790,P=0.009).10例原发灶包膜外侵患者的淋巴转移发生率为65.0%(13/20),87例无包膜外侵患者的淋巴转移发生率为41.2%(42/102),差异有统计学意义(x2=3.833,P=0.047).32例原发灶长径≤1 cm的患者行患侧Ⅵ区清扫,43.8%(14/32)发生淋巴转移,65例原发灶长径＞1 cm患者行双侧Ⅵ区清扫,69.2%(45/65)有患侧Ⅵ区转移,23.1%(15/65)有双侧Ⅵ区转移,两组间同侧Ⅵ区转移率的差异有统计学意义(x2=5.843,P=0.016).结论 Ⅵ区为FTC较早发生淋巴转移的区域,伴有原发灶包膜外侵犯者易发生Ⅵ区淋巴转移.原发灶长径≤1 cm的患者可发生同侧Ⅵ区转移;原发灶长径＞1 cm者可发生双侧Ⅵ区转移.PTC颈淋巴转移可单独或同时发生在Ⅵ区或侧颈区的任何一个区域.术中应常规做Ⅲ、Ⅳ区淋巴结冰冻病理检查,淋巴结阳性者行包括Ⅵ区的改良性颈清扫.