Molecular identification and characterization of the platelet ADP receptor targeted by thienopyridine antithrombotic drugs

ADP plays a critical role in modulating thrombosis and hemostasis. ADP initiates platelet aggregation by simultaneous activation of two G protein-coupled receptors, P2Y1 and P2Y12. Activation of P2Y1 activates phospholipase C and triggers shape change, while P2Y12 couples to Gi to reduce adenylyl cyclase activity. P2Y12 has been shown to be the target of the thienopyridine drugs, ticlopidine and clopidogrel. Recently, we cloned a human orphan receptor, SP1999, highly expressed in brain and platelets, which responded to ADP and had a pharmacological profile similar to that of P2Y12. To determine whether SP1999 is P2Y12, we generated SP1999-null mice. These mice appear normal, but they exhibit highly prolonged bleeding times, and their platelets aggregate poorly in responses to ADP and display a reduced sensitivity to thrombin and collagen. These platelets retain normal shape change and calcium flux in response to ADP but fail to inhibit adenylyl cyclase. In addition, oral clopidogrel does not inhibit aggregation responses to ADP in these mice. These results demonstrate that SP1999 is indeed the elusive receptor, P2Y12. Identification of the target receptor of the thienopyridine drugs affords us a better understanding of platelet function and provides tools that may lead to the discovery of more effective antithrombotic therapies.     

The platelet P2 receptors as molecular targets for old and new antiplatelet drugs

Platelet activation by ADP and ATP plays a crucial role in haemostasis and thrombosis, and their so-called P2 receptors are potential targets for antithrombotic drugs. The ATP-gated channel P2X1 and the 2 G protein-coupled P2Y1 and P2Y12 ADP receptors selectively contribute to platelet aggregation. The P2Y1 receptor is responsible for ADP-induced shape change and weak and transient aggregation, while the P2Y12 receptor is responsible for the completion and amplification of the response to ADP and to all platelet agonists, including thromboxane A2 (TXA2), thrombin, and collagen. The P2X1 receptor is involved in platelet shape change and in activation by collagen under shear conditions. Due to its central role in the formation and stabilization of a thrombus, the P2Y12 receptor is a well-established target of antithrombotic drugs like ticlopidine or clopidogrel, which have proved efficacy in many clinical trials and experimental models of thrombosis. Competitive P2Y12 antagonists have also been shown to be effective in experimental thrombosis as well as in several clinical trials. Studies in P2Y1 and P2X1 knockout mice and experimental thrombosis models using selective P2Y1 and P2X1 antagonists have shown that, depending on the conditions, these receptors could also be potential targets for new antithrombotic drugs.     

Platelet activation by ADP: the role of ADP antagonists

ADP plays a key role in haemostasis and thrombosis. Despite its early identification in 1961 as the first known aggregating agent, the molecular basis of ADP-induced platelet activation is only beginning to be understood. Two purinergic receptors contribute separately to the complex process of ADP-induced platelet aggregation: the P2Y1 metabotropic receptor responsible for mobilization of ionized calcium from internal stores, which initiates aggregation, and P2Y receptor coupled to adenylyl cyclase inhibition, which is essential for the full aggregation response to ADP and stabilization of platelet aggregates. The latter is the molecular target of the ADP-selective antiaggregating drugs ticlopidine and clopidogrel and the ATP analogues of the AR-C series. In addition, it is probably defective in patients with a bleeding diathesis characterized by selective impairment of platelet responses to ADP. Finally, the P2X1 ionotropic receptor is also present in platelets, but its role is not yet known. Studies with P2Y1 knock-out mice as well as the use of selective P2Y1 antagonists have shown that, in addition to the P2Y receptor, which is the target of clopidogrel, the P2Y1 receptor is an important potential target for new antithrombotic drugs.     

Adenine triphosphate nucleotides are antagonists at the P2Y receptor.

The aim of the present study was to characterize the pharmacological profile of the P2Y(12) receptor for several adenine triphosphate nucleotides in view of their possible roles as partial agonists or true antagonists. Two distinct cellular systems were used: P2Y(1) receptor deficient mouse platelets ( platelets) previously shown to express a native and functional P2Y(12) receptor and 1321 N1 astrocytoma cells stably expressing the human P2Y(12) receptor (1321 N1 P2Y(12)). ADP and its structural analogues inhibited cAMP accumulation in a dose-dependent manner in both platelets and 1321 N1 P2Y(12) cells with a similar rank order of potency, 2 methylthio-ADP (2MeSADP) >ADP - Adenosine 5'-(betathio) diphosphate (AlphaDPbetaS). Commercial ATP, 2 chloro; ATP (2ClATP) and 2 methylthio-ATP (2MeSATP) also inhibited cAMP accumulation in both cell systems. In contrast, after creatine phosphate (CP)/creatine phosphokinase (CPK) regeneration, adenine triphosphate nucleotides lost their agonistic effect on platelets and behaved as antagonists of ADP (0.5 microm)-induced adenylyl cyclase inhibition with IC(50) of 13.5 +/- 4.8, 838 +/- 610, 1280 +/- 1246 microm for 2MeSATP, ATP and 2ClATP, respectively. In 1321 N1 P2Y(12) cells, CP/CPK regenerated ATP and 2ClATP lost their agonistic effect only when CP/CPK was maintained during the cAMP assay. The stable ATP analogue ATPgammaS antagonized ADPbetaS-induced inhibition of cAMP accumulation in both platelets and 1321 N1 P2Y(12) cells. Thus, ATP and its triphosphate analogues are not agonists but rather antagonists at the P2Y(12) receptor expressed in platelets or transfected cells, provided care is taken to remove diphosphate contaminants and to prevent the generation of diphosphate nucleotide derivatives by cell ectonucleotidases.     

Potent mechanism-based inhibition of human CYP2B6 by clopidogrel and ticlopidine

The thienopyridine derivatives ticlopidine and clopidogrel are inhibitors of ADP-induced platelet aggregation. Pharmacological activity of these prodrugs depends on cytochrome P450 (P450)-dependent oxidation to the active antithrombotic agent. In this study, we investigated the interaction potential of clopidogrel and ticlopidine by using human liver microsomes and recombinantly expressed P450 isoforms. Both clopidogrel and ticlopidine inhibited CYP2B6 with highest potency and CYP2C19 with lower potency. Clopidogrel also inhibited CYP2C9, and ticlopidine also inhibited CYP1A2, with lower potency. Inhibition of CYP2B6 was time- and concentration-dependent, and as shown by dialysis experiments, it was irreversible and dependent on NADPH, suggesting a mechanism-based mode of action. Inactivation was of nonpseudo-firstorder type with maximal rates of inactivation (K(inact)) for clopidogrel and ticlopidine in microsomes (recombinant CYP2B6) of 0.35 (1.5 min(-1)) and 0.5 min(-1) (0.8 min(-1)), respectively, and half-maximal inactivator concentrations (KI) were 0.5 microM (1.1 microM) for clopidogrel and 0.2 microM (0.8 microM) for ticlopidine. Inhibition was attenuated by the presence of alternative active site ligands but not by nucleophilic trapping agents or reactive oxygen scavengers, further supporting mechanism-based action. A chemical mechanism is discussed based on the known metabolic activation of clopidogrel and on the finding that hemoprotein integrity of recombinant CYP2B6 was not affected by irreversible inhibition. These results suggest the possibility of drug interactions between thienopyridine derivates and drug substrates of CYP2B6 and CYP2C19.     

MRS2500 [2-iodo-N6-methyl-(N)-methanocarba-2'-deoxyadenosine-3',5'-bisphosphate], a potent, selective, and stable antagonist of the platelet P2Y1 receptor with strong antithrombotic activity in mice

The platelet P2Y(1) ADP receptor is an attractive target for new antiplatelet drugs. However, because of the lack of strong and stable antagonists, only a few studies have suggested that pharmacological inhibition of the P2Y(1) receptor could efficiently inhibit experimental thrombosis in vivo. Our aim was to determine whether the newly described potent and selective P2Y(1) receptor antagonist MRS2500 [2-iodo-N(6)-methyl-(N)-methanocarba-2'-deoxyadenosine-3',5'-bisphosphate] could inhibit platelet function ex vivo and experimental thrombosis in mice in vivo. MRS2500 was injected intravenously into mice, and its effect on ex vivo platelet aggregation and in several models of thrombosis in vivo was determined. MRS2500 displayed high potency and stable and selective P2Y(1) receptor inhibition ex vivo. Although MRS2500 injection resulted in only moderate prolongation of the bleeding time, it provided strong protection in systemic thromboembolism induced by infusion of a mixture of collagen and adrenaline. MRS2500 also potently inhibited localized arterial thrombosis in a model of laser-induced vessel wall injury with two degrees of severity. Moreover, combination of MRS2500 with clopidogrel, the irreversible inhibitor of the platelet P2Y(12) receptor for ADP, led to increased antithrombotic efficacy compared with each alone. These results add further evidence for a role of the P2Y(1) receptor in thrombosis and validate the concept that targeting the P2Y(1) receptor could be a relevant alternative or complement to current antiplatelet strategies.     

A clopidogrel-insensitive inducible pool of P2Y12 receptors contributes to thrombus formation: inhibition by elinogrel, a direct-acting, reversible P2Y12 antagonist

It is known that hepatic metabolism limits the antiaggregatory activity of clopidogrel and, as a consequence, its clinical benefits. In this study, we investigated whether other factors exist that could account for clopidogrel's suboptimal antithrombotic activity. Using an in vivo murine FeCl(3) thrombosis model coupled with intravital microscopy, we found that at equivalent, maximal levels of inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation, clopidogrel (50 mg/kg p.o.) failed to reproduce the phenotype associated with P2Y(12) deficiency. However, elinogrel (60 mg/kg p.o.), a direct-acting reversible P2Y(12) antagonist, achieved maximal levels of inhibition in vivo, and its administration (1 mg/kg i.v.) abolished residual thrombosis associated with clopidogrel dosing. Because elinogrel is constantly present in the plasma, whereas the active metabolite of clopidogrel exists for ～2 h, we evaluated whether an intracellular pool of P2Y(12) exists that would be inaccessible to clopidogrel and contribute to its limited antithrombotic activity. Using saturation [(3)H]2-(methylthio)ADP ([(3)H]2MeSADP) binding studies, we first demonstrated that platelet stimulation with thrombin and convulxin (mouse) and thrombin receptor activating peptide (TRAP) (human) significantly increased surface expression of P2Y(12) relative to that of resting platelets. We next found that clopidogrel dose-dependently inhibited ADP-induced aggregation, signaling (cAMP), and surface P2Y(12) on resting mouse platelets, achieving complete inhibition at the highest dose (50 mg/kg), but failed to block this inducible pool. Thus, an inducible pool of P2Y(12) exists on platelets that can be exposed upon platelet activation by strong agonists. This inducible pool is not blocked completely by clopidogrel, contributes to thrombosis in vivo, and can be blocked by elinogrel.     

Inhibition of the platelet P2Y12 receptor for adenosine diphosphate potentiates the antiplatelet effect of prostacyclin

BACKGROUND: Activation of two receptors for adenosine diphosphate (ADP), P2Y(1) and P2Y(12), is necessary for ADP-induced platelet aggregation (PA). It is generally believed that the antithrombotic effects of drugs inhibiting P2Y(12), such as clopidogrel, are uniquely mediated by inhibition of P2Y(12)-dependent PA. However, as P2Y(12) is negatively coupled to adenylyl cyclase (AC), its inhibition may also exert antithrombotic effects through the potentiation of prostacyclin (PGI(2)), which inhibit PA by stimulating AC. OBJECTIVES: To test whether inhibition of P2Y(12) potentiates the antiplatelet effects of PGI(2). METHODS: We measured the effects of PGI(2) (0.01-10 microm) on PA of washed human platelets induced by thrombin (0.5 U mL(-1)) in the presence or absence of ARC69931MX (anti-P2Y(12)) or MRS2500 (anti-P2Y(1)). Results: PGI(2) inhibited PA in the presence of anti-P2Y(12), but not in the presence of anti-P2Y(1) or in the absence of inhibitors. In contrast, dibutyryl-cyclicAMP inhibited PA both in the presence and absence of anti-P2Y(1) or anti-P2Y(12). PGI(2) increased platelet cyclicAMP levels only in the absence of thrombin or in the presence of thrombin plus anti-P2Y(12). CONCLUSIONS: PGI(2) did not inhibit PA induced by thrombin, because its effect on AC was prevented by released ADP interacting with P2Y(12). Anti-P2Y(12) drugs, by rescuing AC activity, potentiate the antiplatelet effect of PGI(2), which may contribute to their antithrombotic effect.     

Nucleotide receptor signaling in platelets

Upon injury to a vessel wall the exposure of subendothelial collagen results in the activation of platelets. Platelet activation culminates in shape change, aggregation, release of granule contents and generation of lipid mediators. These secreted and generated mediators trigger a positive feedback mechanism potentiating the platelet activation induced by physiological agonists such as collagen and thrombin. Adenine nucleotides, adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and adenosine triphosphate (ATP), released from damaged cells and that are secreted from platelet-dense granules, contribute to the positive feedback mechanism by acting through nucleotide receptors on the platelet surface. ADP acts through two G protein-coupled receptors, the Gq-coupled P2Y1 receptor, and the Gi-coupled P2Y12 receptor. ATP, on the other hand, acts through the ligand-gated channel P2X1. Stimulation of platelets by ADP leads to shape change, aggregation and thromboxane A2 generation. ADP-induced dense granule release depends on generated thromboxane A2. Furthermore, costimulation of both P2Y1 and P2Y12 receptors is required for ADP-induced platelet aggregation. ATP stimulation of P2X1 is involved in platelet shape change and helps to amplify platelet responses mediated by agonists such as collagen. Activation of each of these nucleotide receptors results in unique signal transduction pathways that are important in the regulation of thrombosis and hemostasis.     

Pharmacokinetics, drug metabolism, and safety of prasugrel and clopidogrel

Thienopyridines are platelet adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonists used in the treatment and prevention of thrombotic events in patients with acute coronary syndrome. The pharmacokinetic profile of the thienopyridine clopidogrel has resulted in highly variable pharmacokinetics and efficacy responses. The purpose of this review is to provide a brief overview of the pharmacokinetics of prasugrel and clopidogrel and discuss factors that would influence the metabolism of those drugs. Clinical studies have shown that the coadministration of prasugrel with other drugs is less likely to result in clinically relevant pharmacokinetic drug interactions compared with clopidogrel. The lack of effect of variant genotypes on the efficacy of prasugrel suggests that more patients will receive adequate platelet inhibition after administration of prasugrel. The efficient generation of the active metabolite of prasugrel results in greater and more rapid inhibition of P2Y(12) receptor-mediated platelet aggregation.     

Evidence that pre-existent variability in platelet response to ADP accounts for ''clopidogrel resistance''

BACKGROUND: Clopidogrel is a widely used antithrombotic agent that inhibits the platelet P2Y(12) adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor. There is increasing interest in 'clopidogrel resistance'. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether 'clopidogrel resistance' is accounted for by a pre-existent variability in platelet response to ADP. METHODS: Platelet response to 20 microm ADP was analyzed by four independent whole blood flow cytometric assays: platelet surface activated GPIIb-IIIa, platelet surface P-selectin, monocyte-platelet aggregates and neutrophil-platelet aggregates. In 25 consecutive, non-aspirin-treated healthy subjects, we studied platelet response before and after clopidogrel administration. In addition, we studied the platelet response in 613 consecutive aspirinated patients with or without coronary artery disease (CAD, as determined by angiography) who had or had not been treated with clopidogrel. In these patients, we tested for homogeneity of variance across all durations of clopidogrel exposure and severity of CAD by estimating the 'goodness of fit' of two independent models. RESULTS: In the healthy subjects, pre-clopidogrel response to ADP predicted post-clopidogrel response to ADP. In the patients, clopidogrel, as expected, inhibited the platelet response to ADP. However, irrespective of the duration of clopidogrel administration, the severity of CAD, and the dose of aspirin, clopidogrel did not increase the variance in the platelet response to ADP in any of the four assays of platelet response. CONCLUSIONS: These studies provide evidence that 'clopidogrel resistance' is accounted for by a pre-existent variability in platelet response to ADP and this variability is not increased by clopidogrel administration.     

Differential impacts of CYP2C19 gene polymorphisms on the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel and ticlopidine

We examined the influence of CYP2C19 polymorphisms on the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel and ticlopidine. The platelet aggregation induced by 20 μmol/l adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and CYP2C19 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (*2 and *3) was determined in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) who were taking aspirin alone (n = 21), aspirin plus clopidogrel (n = 97), or aspirin plus ticlopidine (n = 47). The degree of platelet aggregation in the clopidogrel group, although not in the ticlopidine group, depended on the CYP2C19 polymorphism, and the maximal platelet aggregation in poor metabolizers (PMs) taking clopidogrel was equivalent to that in the group taking aspirin alone. After being switched from clopidogrel to ticlopidine, all seven of the PMs showed markedly lower platelet aggregation. These results suggest that CYP2C19 polymorphisms have a profound impact on the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel but not on that of ticlopidine. Ticlopidine may be an effective therapeutic option for CYP2C19 PMs.     

Oral antiplatelet agents in ACS: from pharmacology to clinical differences

Antiplatelet agents play an essential role in the treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Numerous clinical trials have established the value of antiplatelet therapies for ACS. Aspirin (ASA), thienopyridines and GP IIb/IIIa antagonists comprise the major classes of antiplatelet therapies demonstrated to be of benefit in the treatment of ACS. Thienopyridines are a class of drugs that function via inhibition of the adenosine diphosphate (ADP) P2Y12 platelet receptors. Currently, clopidogrel, a second generation thienopyridine, is the main drug of choice and the combination of aspirin and clopidogrel is administered orally for the treatment of ACS. Recently, a third generation of thienopyridines has been introduced represented by prasugrel that has demonstrated promising results in ACS patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A number of nonthienopyridine oral antiplatelet drugs are under development, and one of them, ticagrelor has already been tested in a major phase III clinical trial, PLATO, with the inclusion of a broad spectrum of patients with ACS. The present review aims to discuss the present knowledge about the safety and efficacy of oral antiplatelet treatment of patients with ACS.     

The active metabolite of prasugrel inhibits adenosine diphosphate- and collagen-stimulated platelet procoagulant activities

Summary.  Background : Prasugrel is a novel antiplatelet prodrug of the same thienopyridine class as clopidogrel and ticlopidine. Metabolism of prasugrel generates the active metabolite R-138727, an antagonist of the platelet P2Y₁₂ adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor, leading to inhibition of ADP-mediated platelet activation and aggregation. ADP also enhances the platelet response to collagen, and these two agonists contribute to the generation of platelet procoagulant activity. We therefore examined whether R-138727 inhibits ADP- and collagen-triggered platelet procoagulant activities. Methods and results : As shown by whole blood flow cytometry, R-138727 inhibited surface phosphatidylserine expression on ADP plus collagen-stimulated platelets and tissue factor (TF) expression on ADP-, collagen-, and ADP plus collagen-stimulated monocyte–platelet aggregates. R-138727 reduced monocyte–platelet aggregate formation, thereby further inhibiting TF expression. ADP, collagen, and ADP plus collagen accelerated the kinetics of thrombin generation in recalcified whole blood and R-138727 significantly inhibited this acceleration. Clot strength in a modified thromboelastograph system was also inhibited by R-138727 (IC₅₀ 0.7 ± 0.1 μ m ). Conclusions : In addition to its previously known inhibitory effects on platelet activation and aggregation, the active metabolite of prasugrel, R-138727, inhibits platelet procoagulant activity in whole blood (as determined by phosphatidylserine expression on platelets and TF expression on monocyte–platelet aggregates), resulting in the functional consequences of delayed thrombin generation and impaired clot development.     

P2Y12 regulates platelet adhesion/activation,thrombus growth,and thrombus stability in injured arteries

The critical role for ADP in arterial thrombogenesis was established by the clinical success of P2Y12 antagonists, currently used at doses that block 40-50% of the P2Y12 on platelets. This study was designed to determine the role of P2Y12 in platelet thrombosis and how its complete absence affects the thrombotic process. P2Y12-null mice were generated by a gene-targeting strategy. Using an in vivo mesenteric artery injury model and real-time continuous analysis of the thrombotic process, we observed that the time for appearance of first thrombus was delayed and that only small, unstable thrombi formed in P2Y12-/- mice without reaching occlusive size, in the absence of aspirin. Platelet adhesion to vWF was impaired in P2Y12-/- platelets. While adhesion to fibrinogen and collagen appeared normal, the platelets in thrombi from P2Y12-/- mice on collagen were less dense and less activated than their WT counterparts. P2Y12-/- platelet activation was also reduced in response to ADP or a PAR-4-activating peptide. Thus, P2Y12 is involved in several key steps of thrombosis: platelet adhesion/activation, thrombus growth, and stability. The data suggest that more aggressive strategies of P2Y12 antagonism will be antithrombotic without the requirement of aspirin cotherapy and may provide benefits even to the aspirin-nonresponder population.     

Plasma ectonucleotidases prevent desensitization of purinergic receptors in stored platelets: importance for platelet activity during thrombus formation

BACKGROUND: Platelets (PLTs) contain purinergic receptors for ATP (P2X1) and ADP (P2Y1 and P2Y12) that rapidly desensitize upon stimulation with these nucleotides. In vivo, this is antagonized by ectonucleotidases on the surface of endothelial cells and white blood cells (WBCs). The receptor desensitization of ATP- and ADP-induced responses of PLTs stored in plasma without WBCs was investigated. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: ATP- and ADP-induced PLT shape change (shear-induced) aggregation and Ca2+ signaling were measured in the presence or absence of plasma. Degradation of nucleotides in plasma was quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: Washed PLTs became refractory for ATP and ADP in shape change, aggregation, and Ca2+ responses during a 90-minute incubation at 37 degrees C. The PLT responses mediated by P2X1, P2Y1, and P2Y12 receptors gradually reduced or disappeared. When plasma was present, however, the PLTs persistently showed high responses to ATP and ADP. Heat treatment of plasma abolished this effect. Also under conditions of flow and high shear, PLTs in plasma kept high P2X1 activity, mediating aggregate formation. In isolated plasma, not containing WBCs, nucleotides were degraded in the order of ADP/UDP>ATP/UTP. Degradation of ATP was partly inhibited by blocking the ecto-NTPDase CD39, whereas degradation of both ATP and ADP was inhibited by blocking ectopyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase activity. Part of the nucleotide-degrading activities appeared to be membrane-bound. CONCLUSION: Ectonucleotidases in plasma preserve the functionality of P2X1 and P2Y receptors. Upon PLT storage, these plasma activities are essential to ensure adequate (shear-dependent) formation of aggregates and thrombi.     

The greater in vivo antiplatelet effects of prasugrel as compared to clopidogrel reflect more efficient generation of its active metabolite with similar antiplatelet activity to that of clopidogrel''s active metabolite

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: Prasugrel is a novel orally active thienopyridine prodrug with potent and long-lasting antiplatelet effects. Platelet inhibition reflects inhibition of P2Y(12) receptors by its active metabolite (AM). Previous studies have shown that the antiplatelet potency of prasugrel is at least 10 times higher than that of clopidogrel in rats and humans, but the mechanism of its higher potency has not yet been fully elucidated. RESULTS: Oral administration of prasugrel to rats resulted in dose-related and time-related inhibition of ex vivo platelet aggregation, and its effect was about 10 times more potent than that of clopidogrel. The plasma concentration of prasugrel AM was higher than that of clopidogrel AM despite tenfold higher doses of clopidogrel, indicating more efficient in vivo production of prasugrel AM than of clopidogrel AM. In rat platelets, prasugrel AM inhibited in vitro platelet aggregation induced by adenosine 5'-diphosphate (ADP) (10 microm) with an IC(50) value of 1.8 microm. Clopidogrel AM similarly inhibited platelet aggregation with an IC(50) value of 2.4 microm. Similar results were also observed for ADP-induced (10 microm) decreases in prostaglandin E(1)-stimulated rat platelet cAMP levels. These results indicate that both AMs have similar in vitro antiplatelet activities. CONCLUSIONS: The greater in vivo antiplatelet potency of prasugrel as compared to clopidogrel reflects more efficient in vivo generation of its AM, which demonstrates similar in vitro activity to clopidogrel AM.     

Variable effect of P2Y12 inhibition on platelet thrombus volume in flowing blood

Summary. Background and objectives: Patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention receive aspirin and P2Y12 ADP receptor inhibitors to reduce thrombotic complications. The choice of methodology for monitoring the effects of treatment and assessing its efficacy is still a topic of debate. We evaluated how decreased P2Y12 function influences platelet aggregate (thrombus) size measured ex vivo. Methods and results: We used confocal videomicroscopy to measure in real time the volume of platelet thrombi forming upon blood perfusion over fibrillar collagen type I at a wall shear rate of 1500 s^?1. The average volume was significantly smaller in 31 patients receiving aspirin and clopidogrel (19) or ticlopidine (12) than in 21 controls, but individual values were above the lower limit of the normal distribution, albeit mostly within the lower quartile, in 61.3% of cases. Disaggregation of platelet thrombi at later perfusion times occurred frequently in the patients. Vasodilator‐stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation, reflecting P2Y12 inhibition, was also decreased in the patient group, and only 22.6% of individual values were above the lower normal limit. We found no correlation between volume of thrombus formed on collagen fibrils and level of P2Y12 inhibition, suggesting that additional and individually variable factors can influence the inhibitory effect of treatment on platelet function. Conclusions: Measurements of platelet thrombus formation in flowing blood reflects the consequences of antiplatelet therapy in a manner that is not proportional to P2Y12 inhibition. Combining the results of the two assays may improve the assessment of thrombotic risk.     

Platelet aggregation disorders

Irrespective of their mechanism of action, anticoagulants reduce the formation and action of thrombin. Thus they interfere with a final step in coagulation. Among platelet inhibitors only the GPIIb/IIIa antagonists inhibit the common pathway of aggregation, namely the formation of platelet-to-platelet bridges which are mediated by fibrinogen or von Willebrand factor. In contrast, acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), NSAIDs, clopidogrel (Plavix) or ticlopidine (Tyklid) inhibit platelet activation by abrogating the formation or action of a secondary platelet agonist, namely of thromboxane A(2) or ADP. They do not block platelet aggregation which is directly induced by thrombin. Therefore, ASA, clopidogrel, or ticlopidine are not associated with a significant risk of bleeding as long as other factors such as an extensive thrombocytopenia or anticoagulation are not involved. Therefore, in contrast to anticoagulants, therapeutic drug monitoring is not necessary with ASA, clopidogrel, nor ticlopidine. On the other hand, ASA has even to be applied at a dosage that almost completely inhibits thromboxane synthesis in order to act on platelet aggregation at all. Among the GPIIb/IIIa-antagonists only parenteral drugs have been approved for therapeutic use, e. g. abciximab (ReoPro), eptifibatide (Integrilin), and tirofiban (Aggrastat). Clinical studies revealed an increased risk of bleeding without a sufficient therapeutic benefit of oral GPIIb/IIIa antagonists. GPIIb/IIIa antagonists may induce thrombocytopenia that is attributed to an out-side-in signalling or immunological phenomena. A test system (Ultegra, Accumetrics) is available for a therapeutic drug monitoring of GPIIb/IIIa antagonists. However, estimation of the bleeding risk always requires an evaluation of all factors influencing the haemostatic system, especially when heparin or other inhibitors are applied additionally.