Experience with combination of docetaxel, cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy, and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Background

Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of cisplatin, fluorouracil, and docetaxel chemotherapy plus intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

Methods

Sixty patients with locoregionally advanced NPC were enrolled. Patients received IMRT plus three courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and two courses of adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of docetaxel (60 mg/m²/day on day 1), cisplatin (25 mg/m²/day on days 1–3), and 5-fluorouracil (500 mg/m²/day on days 1–3).

Results

The overall response rate to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 89 %. Three months after the completion of radiotherapy, 53 (93 %) patients achieved complete regression, 3 (5 %) achieved partial response (PR), and 1 experienced liver metastasis. However, among the 3 PR patients, 2 patients had no evidence of relapse in the follow-up. With a median follow-up of 27 months (range, 6–43), the 2-year estimated locoregional failure-free survival, distant failure-free survival, progression-free survival, and overall survival were 96.6, 93.3, 89.9, and 98.3 %, respectively. Leukopenia was the main adverse effect in chemotherapy; 14 patients experienced grade 3 or grade 4 neutropenia, and 1 patient developed febrile neutropenia. The nonhematological adverse events included alopecia, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, and diarrhea. The incidence of grade 3 acute radiotherapy-related mucositis was 28.3 %; no grade 4 acute mucositis was observed. No grade 3 or grade 4 hematological toxicity occurred during radiotherapy. None of the patients had interrupted radiotherapy. The common late adverse effects included xerostomia and hearing impairment.

Conclusions

Neoadjuvant–adjuvant chemotherapy using cisplatin, fluorouracil, plus docetaxel combined with IMRT was an effective and well-tolerated alternative for advanced NPC.     

Phase II trial of neoadjuvant docetaxel and cisplatin followed by intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Purpose

To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy involving docetaxel and cisplatin followed by intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with concurrent cisplatin in patients with newly diagnosed stage III to IVB nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

Methods

Docetaxel (75 mg/m² on day 1) and cisplatin (75 mg/m² on day 1) were administered on a 3-week cycle for 2 courses, followed by radical IMRT (72 Gy/33F/6.5–7 W) with concurrent cisplatin (75 mg/m², on day 1) every 3 weeks for 2 cycles.

Results

From June 2008 to October 2010, forty-six patients were recruited in this trial. Forty-five patients completed neoadjuvant setting, and all patients completed planned concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). The complete and partial response rates were 28.3 and 56.5 % after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 91.3, 8.7 % after CCRT, respectively. After median follow-up of 26 months (range 12–39 months), one patient experienced local recurrence and 4 patients developed distant metastasis. The 3-year overall survival and progression-free survival rate were 94.1 and 72.7 %, respectively. Neutropenia (37.0 %) and vomiting (28.3 %) were the most common Grade 3–4 adverse effects during neoadjuvant course, while mucositis (30.4 %), xerostomia (30.4 %) and radiodermatitis (21.7 %) were the most common Grades 3 acute toxicities during CCRT. Xerostomia (73.9 %), dysphagia (56.5 %), hear loss (30.4 %) and skin reaction (21.7 %) were the common Grade 1–2 late effects. There were no Grades 3–4 late toxicities.

Conclusions

The protocol of neoadjuvant docetaxel and cisplatin followed by IMRT with concurrent cisplatin was well tolerated, with outstanding compliance and efficacy in locally advanced NPC, which deserved further follow-up.     

Comparison of combination chemotherapy with irinotecan and cisplatin regimen administered every 2 or 4 weeks in pretreated patients with unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer: retrospective analysis

Background

Efficacy and safety of irinotecan and cisplatin administration every 2 weeks (biweekly regimen) or 4 weeks (4-weekly regimen) in patients with pretreated unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer was retrospectively evaluated.

Methods

Study patients comprised two cohorts: cohort 1, consisting of 31 patients received chemotherapy on a 4-weekly regimen; and cohort 2, consisting of 32 patients received chemotherapy on a biweekly regimen. In cohort 1, patients received irinotecan (70 mg/m²) on days 1 and 15 and cisplatin (80 mg/m²) on day 1 every 4 weeks; in cohort 2, patients received irinotecan (60 mg/m²) on day 1 and cisplatin (30 mg/m²) on day 1 every 2 weeks.

Results

Response rates were for cohorts 1 and 2 were 26% (7/27) and 28% (7/25) in patients with measurable lesions, median progression-free survivals were 3.5 and 4.3 months, and median survival times after irinotecan and cisplatin initiation were 9.5 and 10.1 months, respectively. The incidence of grades 3 and 4 hematological toxicities in cohorts 1 and 2 were 74% and 44% for leukopenia, 81% and 53% for neutropenia, and 45% and 28% for anemia, respectively. Incidences of grades 3 and 4 nonhematological toxicities were 23% and 12% for nausea, 23% and 9% for vomiting, 19% and 12% for anorexia, and 6% and 6% for febrile neutropenia, respectively.

Conclusion

Irinotecan plus cisplatin chemotherapy administered on a biweekly regimen was comparable in efficacy to a 4-weekly regimen and might be more feasible than the 4-weekly regimen.     

Phase II study of ifosfamide and cisplatin for the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer

Purpose

The aim of this phase II study was to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of combined ifosfamide and cisplatin chemotherapy in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

Experimental design

Forty-seven patients with recurrent EOC were treated with ifosfamide 5 g/m² and cisplatin 50 mg/m² on day 1, every 3 weeks for 6 cycles. The primary outcomes were response rate (RR) and toxicity. Other measurements were duration of response, time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS).

Results

All 47 patients with 160 cycles were assessed for response and toxicity. The overall RR was 31.9 %; there were 3 complete responses (6.4 %) and 12 partial responses (25.5 %). Grade 3 and 4 hematologic toxicities included neutropenia (23.6 %), anemia (12.8 %), and thrombocytopenia (10.7 %). Non-hematologic toxicities were mild, and no drug-related toxic deaths occurred. The median duration of response, TTP, and OS was 5.1, 4.8, and 17.0 months, respectively. In the initially platinum-sensitive group, RR and OS were 44.4 % and 20.4 months, while in the initially platinum-resistant group, these values were 15.0 and 8.7 months, respectively (P = 0.027 and P = 0.002, respectively).

Conclusion

Ifosfamide combined with cisplatin is a well-tolerated regimen with modest activity in recurrent EOC. In addition, this regimen was especially effective in patients whose disease was initially platinum-sensitive.     

A multi-center phase II study of docetaxel plus cisplatin as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic squamous cell esophageal cancer

Objective

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel and cisplatin combination chemotherapy in patients with metastatic esophageal cancer.

Methods

Patients with untreated metastatic squamous cell esophageal cancer, which was histologically proven with at least one measurable lesion, were eligible for the study. Docetaxel 70 mg/m² and cisplatin 70 mg/m² were intravenously given on day 1 of 21 days schedule.

Results

From December 2004 to December 2007, total of 39 patients (M/F = 39/0) were enrolled. The median age was 65 years. Thirty-four patients were evaluable for response. There were 3 (7.7%) complete remission, 10 (25.6%) partial remission, 11 (28.2%) stable disease, and 10 (25.6%) progression disease. The objective tumor response rate was 33.3% in intention-to-treat (ITT). Median PFS was 5.0 months and median survival was 8.3 months. Median number of cycles administered was 3. The relative dose intensity of docetaxel and cisplatin was 92 and 91%, respectively. This treatment was comparatively tolerated with grade 3/4 neutropenia in 20.5%/10.3%, grade 3 infection in 2.6% of patients.

Conclusion

Docetaxel plus cisplatin combination chemotherapy showed promising antitumor activity with manageable toxicities in patients with metastatic squamous esophageal cancer.     

Multicenter phase II study of capecitabine combined with nedaplatin for recurrent and metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients after failure of cisplatin-based chemotherapy

Purpose

There is no standard second-line regimen for recurrent and metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients after failure of cisplatin-based chemotherapy. A multicenter phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of capecitabine combined with nedaplatin for these patients.

Patients and methods

In the multicenter, open-label, single-arm phase II study, patients with recurrent and metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma who failed to previous cisplatin-based chemotherapy were enrolled. Patients received oral capecitabine (1,000 mg/m² twice daily from day 1 to 14) and intravenous nedaplatin (80 mg/m², day 1) every 3 weeks for two cycles at least.

Results

A total of forty-eight patients were enrolled and included in the intention-to-treat analysis of efficacy and adverse events. Treatment was well tolerated. Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (8.4 %), anemia (2.1 %), diarrhea (4.2 %), stomatitis (6.3 %), and hand-foot syndrome (HFS) (4.2 %). There were two complete response (4.2 %), eighteen partial responses (37.5 %), giving an overall response rate of 41.7 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 27.7–55.8]. With a median follow-up period of 12.1 months, the median time to progression was 5.8 months (95 % CI 3.9–7.8 months) and median overall survival was 12.4 months (95 % CI 9.6–16.8 months).

Conclusion

Capecitabine combined with nedaplatin offers a satisfactory clinical activity and an acceptable safety profile for recurrent and metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients after failure of cisplatin-based chemotherapy.     

Concurrent chemoradiation followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Korea

Purpose

Concomitant approach using cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has shown an excellent local control rate and significantly reduced distant metastasis in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, optimal schedule and dosing of chemotherapy still need to be developed to reduce distant metastasis. This retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy, toxicity, and tolerability of a concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) regimen using cisplatin and 5-FU followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in patients with locoregioanlly advanced NPC.

Methods

Forty-three NPC patients who had AJCC stage T3/T4 or N2/N3 and M0 disease were evaluated. The chemotherapy during CCRT consisted of cisplatin (75 mg/m² on day 1) plus 5-FU (750 mg/m²/day on day 1–5), delivered every 4 weeks for two cycles. Three cycles of AC were given with cisplatin (75 mg/m²), epirubicin (37.5 mg/m²) on day 1, and bleomycin (7.5 mg/m² bolus iv. on day 1 followed by 9 mg/m² on day 1–5 by continuous infusion) every 3 weeks.

Results

The overall response rate after CCRT was 95% (22 CRs and 19 PRs in 43) and 100% (16 CRs and 8 PRs in 24) after AC. Grade 3/4 neutropenia, mucositis, and weight loss were observed during CCRT phase in 18, 44, and 26% of patients, respectively. AC caused grade 3/4 neutropenia and emesis in 12.5 and 20.8% of patients, respectively.

Conclusions

CCRT regimen using cisplatin and 5-FU followed by three cycles of BEC chemotherapy was effective in locally advanced NPC patients, with acceptable and reversible acute toxicities.     

Combination of three cytotoxic agents in small-cell lung cancer

Purpose

The established treatment for small-cell lung cancer has been a cisplatin–etoposide combination, as the most effective chemotherapy regimen. Paclitaxel has also been used in combination with cisplatin and etoposide but this has been unacceptable due to the toxicity. This toxicity could be attributed to the three consequent days of treatment with etoposide plus the doses of each of the three drugs. Our objectives were to determine an equal or longer survival and lower toxicity by administering all 3 drugs with low dosage on day one, compared to the established guideline of 3-day administration.

Methods

We tested the aforementioned three-drug combination and avoided the toxicity in the majority of patients by administering all 3 drugs on day one. Fifty-one patients (50 evaluable) were recruited from 4 oncology clinics. All patients had histologically or cytologically confirmed small-cell lung cancer with limited and extensive disease in 40 and 60 % of the patients, respectively. The treatment was: cisplatin 75 mg/m², etoposide 120 mg/m² (maximum 200 mg), and paclitaxel 135 mg/m². The agents were administered on day one and repeated every 3 weeks for 6 cycles.

Results

The median survival was 15 months (95 % CI 13.6–16.4) (mean 16 months). Forty-five (90 %) patients achieved a response: 20 (40 %) patients, a complete response and 25 (50 %), a partial response. Adverse reactions included grade 3 and 4 neutropenia in 12 and 2 % of the patients, respectively. Other side effects were of very low toxicity.

Conclusion

The 1-day, three-agent (cisplatin–etoposide–paclitaxel) treatment of small-cell lung cancer is beneficial with respect to response rate and survival, and the toxicity is low and well-tolerated.     

FOLFIRI as second-line chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer: a GISCAD multicenter phase II study

Purpose

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the activity and the tolerability of the FOLFIRI regimen, administered as second-line chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer after the failure of a gemcitabine-based regimen.

Methods

Patients with locally advanced/metastatic disease who received a first-line chemotherapy (one line only) with gemcitabine ± platinoid (cisplatin, oxaliplatin) and who had measurable disease conform with the RECIST criteria were eligible for the study. FOLFIRI consists of irinotecan 180 mg/m² iv on day 1, leucovorin (l-form) 200 mg/m² iv on day 1 and 2, 5-FU 400 mg/m² iv bolus on days 1 and 2, and 5-FU 600 mg/m² iv by ci for 22 h on days 1 and 2, repeated every 2 weeks. The primary end point was the response rate.

Results

Among the 50 enrolled patients, 4 partial responses (PR) (8 %) and 14 stable diseases were observed, for a disease control rate of 18/50 (36 %). Forty-one patients (82 %) have been pretreated with cisplatin/oxaliplatin+gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy. The median progression-free and overall survivals were 3.2 and 5 months, respectively. The 6-month survival rate was 32 %. Grade 3–4 neutropenia and diarrhea occurred in 10 (20 %) and 6 (12 %) patients, respectively.

Conclusion

The FOLFIRI regimen showed a modest clinical activity in this quite heavily pretreated patients’ population with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer with a manageable toxicity profile.     

A phase II trial of modified weekly irinotecan and cisplatin for chemotherapy-naïve patients with metastatic or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus

Purpose

This phase II study assessed the efficacy and toxicity profile of a modified weekly irinotecan and cisplatin for chemotherapy-naïve patients with metastatic/recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SQCC).

Methods

The eligibility criteria included histologically confirmed esophageal SQCC, no prior chemotherapy, adequate organ functions and written informed consent. Patients received irinotecan 65 mg/m² plus cisplatin 30 mg/m² on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks.

Results

Thirty-two patients were assessed for response and toxicity. Ten patients achieved a partial response (31.3%; 95% CI, 16.0–50.0%). With a median follow-up of 19.0 months, median progression-free and overall survival was 4.4 and 9.6 months, respectively, with a 1-year survival rate of 27.4%. Grade (G) 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 50.0% of the patients, which was the most common cause of dose reduction or therapy delay. G3 non-hematologic toxicity included seven (21.9%) asthenias, four (12.5%) diarrheas, and one (3.1%) nausea/vomiting, but no G4 non-hematologic toxicity was observed.

Conclusions

This modified weekly irinotecan and cisplatin failed to ameliorate hematologic toxicity and to improve efficacy. However, easy administration and favorable non-hematologic toxicity as well as modest anti-tumor activity against metastatic or recurrent esophageal SQCC can make this regimen a potential treatment option, given the complexity of administration and toxicity of conventional infusional 5-FU and cisplatin.     

Polymorphisms in ERCC1 C8092A predict progression-free survival in metastatic/recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy

Objectives

We evaluated whether DNA repair gene polymorphisms had an effect on clinical outcomes in metastatic/recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

Materials and methods

Clinical data of 101 patients with metastatic/recurrent NPC between 2004 and 2011 were reviewed. Five potentially functional polymorphisms (ERCC1 Asn118Asn, ERCC1 C8092A, XPD Lys751Gln, XRCC1 Arg399Gln and XRCC1 Arg280His) were genotyped using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry.

Results

The ERCC1 C8092A polymorphism was an independent predictor of PFS in Chinese NPC patients treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Compared to the patients carrying the C/C genotype, the patients with the C/A or A/A genotype had an increased risk of disease progression on cisplatin-based chemotherapy (7.9 vs. 9.3 months; HR 1.61; 95 % CI 1.08–2.61; p = 0.047). However, no association between the other polymorphisms, response rate, disease progression and survival was detected in metastatic/recurrent NPC patients.

Conclusion

The ERCC1 C8092A polymorphism might be a useful predictive marker in metastatic/recurrent NPC patients treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. However, a large-scale prospective study is warranted to validate our findings.     

Promising overall survival of patients with recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck receiving gemcitabine plus cisplatin treatment: report of a multi-center phase II study

Purpose

The efficacy and safety of gemcitabine in combination with cisplatin (GC) as the first-line treatment in patients with recurrent/metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (SCCHN) was examined.

Patients and methods

Patients with R/M SCCHN without prior treatment for their R/M disease were eligible and treated with gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m² on day 1, day 8 and cisplatin 80 mg/m² on day 8 every 21 days.

Results

Forty patients were enrolled from March 2004 to January 2006, and 30 were evaluable for treatment effectiveness and outcome. The median age of evaluable patients was 50 years and all patients were male. Partial response was observed in 9 (30%) and stable disease in 7 (23.3%) patients. The overall response rate and disease control rate was 30 and 53.3%, respectively. The major toxic effects were ≥grade 3 leukopenia and anemia (65 and 27.5%, respectively). With a follow-up of 72 months, the median time to progression (TTP) was 128 days (95% CI, 78–242) and median overall survival (OS) was 401 days (95% CI, 216 ~not reached).

Conclusions

This GC regimen demonstrates a good activity and a promising survival period in patients with R/M SCCHN.     

Phase II study of docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-FU induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer

Purpose

This study sought to determine the feasibility and safety of induction chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) triple combination chemotherapy (TPF) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC).

Methods

Patients with advanced NPC were treated with three cycles of induction chemotherapy. Docetaxel (70 mg/m²) and cisplatin (75 mg/m²) were given on day 1, followed by 5-FU (1,000 mg/m²) as a continuous infusion for 4 days. After induction chemotherapy, cisplatin was given at a dose of 100 mg/m² every 3 weeks with radiotherapy.

Results

Thirty-three patients were enrolled; all patients were stage III (n = 4, 12.1%) or IV (n = 29, 87.9%). Among the patients, 32 patients completed both induction TPF therapy and CCRT, with responses as follows: five patients (15.2%) achieved a complete response (CR), and 27 patients (81.8%) a partial response (PR). At 6 weeks after CCRT, 23 patients (69.7%) had a CR and 9 patients (27.3%) a PR. The 3-year progression-free survival was 75.6% and the 3-year overall survival was 86.1%. Neutropenia (72.7%), febrile neutropenia (9.1%), and nausea (9.1%) were the most severe toxicities (grade 3–4) during induction chemotherapy, and mucositis (39.4%), fatigue (15.2%), and nausea (9.1%) were the most common toxicities (grade 3–4) during CCRT.

Conclusions

Although most patients had stage IV NPC, the TPF induction chemotherapy followed by CCRT showed promising activity with manageable toxicity. These results demonstrated the possibility of effective treatment with the aim of not only a palliative, but also a curative, approach to the treatment of advanced NPC.     

Safety and efficacy of neratinib in combination with weekly paclitaxel and trastuzumab in women with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer: an NSABP Foundation Research Program phase I study

Purpose

Neratinib is an oral, small-molecule inhibitor that irreversibly binds to pan-HER (ErbB) receptor tyrosine kinases. Studies suggest that dual anti-HER therapies utilized in breast cancer patients are more efficacious than single agents in both the metastatic and neoadjuvant settings. In this phase I study, neratinib was combined with trastuzumab and paclitaxel in metastatic HER2-positive patients.

Methods

Twenty-one patients entered this dose-escalation study to determine the maximum-tolerated dose, safety, and efficacy of neratinib (120 up to 240 mg/day) with trastuzumab (4 mg/kg IV loading dose, then 2 mg/kg IV weekly), and paclitaxel (80 mg/m² IV days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle) in women with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anti-HER agent(s) and a taxane.

Results

The recommended phase II dose of neratinib with trastuzumab and paclitaxel was 200 mg/day. Common grade 3/4 adverse events were diarrhea (38 %), dehydration (14 %), electrolyte imbalance (19 %), and fatigue (19 %). With mandated primary diarrheal prophylaxis, ≥grade 3 diarrhea was not observed. Objective responses, complete (CR) and partial (PR), occurred in eight patients (38 %), with a clinical benefit of CR + PR+ stable disease (SD) ≥24 weeks in 11 patients (52 %). Median time-to-disease progression was 3.7 months.

Conclusions

Dual anti-HER blockade with neratinib and trastuzumab resulted in significant clinical benefit despite prior exposure to trastuzumab, lapatinib, T-DM1, a taxane, and multiple lines of chemotherapy. In selected populations, inhibiting multiple ErbB-family receptors may be more advantageous than single-agent inhibition. Based on favorable tolerance and efficacy, this three-drug combination will be further assessed in a randomized phase II neoadjuvant trial (NSABP FB-7:NCT01008150).     

Multicenter phase II trial of S-1, paclitaxel and cisplatin triplet combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer

Objective

The present study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a combination regimen of S-1, paclitaxel plus cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Methods

Patients with previously untreated metastatic or recurrent, measurable gastric cancer received intravenous paclitaxel 80?mg/m² plus cisplatin 30?mg/m² on days 1, 8 and S-1 35?mg/m² orally twice daily on days 1?C14 based on a 3-week cycle.

Results

Forty-four patients were enrolled in the current study, among whom 38 were assessable for efficacy and all assessable for toxicity. Two complete response and 24 partial responses were confirmed, giving an overall response rate of 59.1%. At a median follow-up of 11.4?months, the median time to progression and median overall survival was 9.4 (95% CI 6.8?C12.1) months and 11.2 (95% CI 7.6?C14.8) months, respectively. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 45 events (20.9%) and febrile neutropenia was observed in five events (2.3%). The common non-hematologic toxicity was nausea (grade 1/2, 27.2%) and diarrhea (grade 1/2, 9.0%).

Conclusion

The combination of S-1, paclitaxel and cisplatin was found to be well tolerated and effective in patients with advanced gastric cancer.     

Interferon alpha plus 13-cis-retinoic acid modulation of BCL-2 plus paclitaxel for recurrent small-cell lung cancer (SCLC): an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study (E6501)

Background

Patients with recurrent small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) have dismal outcomes. The failure of salvage therapy is due to the possible development of resistance mechanisms, such as the upregulation of the anti-apoptosis protein, Bcl-2. We conducted a phase II study to evaluate if modulation of Bcl-2 with 13-cis-retinoic acid (13-CRA) and interferon alpha could improve response rates when combined with paclitaxel in patients with recurrent SCLC.

Methods

Patients with recurrent SCLC and measurable disease were treated with interferon alpha at 6 million units/m² subcutaneously and 13-CRA 1 mg/kg orally on days 1 and 2 and paclitaxel 75 mg/m² intravenously on day 2 of each week for 6 weeks of an 8-week treatment cycle. Treatment was continued until disease progression, development of unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was response rate with secondary endpoints of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Bcl-2 levels were assessed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs).

Results

Thirty-seven patients were enrolled; 34 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis as 3 patients were ineligible for the study. There were 3 partial responses (9 %), and 5 patients had stable disease (15 %) as best response. The median PFS was 2 months, and median OS was 6.2 months. Although mean Bcl-2 protein levels decreased with therapy in PBMCs, there was no association between Bcl-2 levels and response rate or survival.

Conclusion

Despite sound pre-clinical evidence, the addition of 13-CRA and interferon alpha to paclitaxel did not improve outcomes for recurrent SCLC.     

Long-term results of combined chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin for metastatic urothelial carcinomas

Background

This retrospective study aimed to determine the long-term effects and toxicity of a combined chemotherapeutic regimen of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) in the treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinomas (UCs).

Methods

Seventy-one patients with metastatic UC were treated with GC (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² on days 1, 8, and 15 and cisplatin 70 mg/m² on day 2 every 28 days). The patients were divided into 3 groups: patients who had not undergone prior chemotherapy (group 1), patients who relapsed more than 6 months after being treated with the prior cisplatin-based regimen (group 2), and patients in whom the prior cisplatin-based regimen demonstrated no effect (group 3). The median follow-up was 42 months.

Results

In group 1, 20 of the 32 patients (63%) showed an objective response, with 6 achieving a clinically complete response (CR) and 14 a partial response (PR) with GC. Ten of 32 patients (31%) and 1 of 7 patients (14%) showed objective responses in groups 2 and 3, respectively. Patients in group 2 who had previously been treated with regimens other than GC showed a better objective response (58%) than those with GC (15%). The median time to progression in group 1 was 6 months, and the median overall survival was 14 months. In all, the nonhematological toxicities associated with GC were quite mild. Grade 3–4 toxicity was primarily hematological, including anemia (19%), neutropenia (36%), and thrombocytopenia (42%).

Conclusions

GC is therefore considered to be a highly effective and well-tolerated regimen with moderate toxicity for the treatment of metastatic UCs.     

Platinum and anthracycline therapy for advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma

Background

Because metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) is rare, standard chemotherapy has not been fully established. In Japan, combination platinum and anthracycline chemotherapy has been used for elderly patients with advanced CSCC because of its low toxicity. However, the clinical benefit of this therapy has not been fully examined.

Methods

We retrospectively examined the response rate of combination platinum and anthracycline chemotherapy for metastatic CSCC.

Results

Eight patients received combination chemotherapy for metastatic lesions; there were lymph node lesions in 6 patients and skin and lung lesions in one patient each. The combination regimens were as follows: cisplatin (CDDP) (60–90 mg/m²/day, day 1) and adriamycin (ADM) (20–40 mg/m²/day, day 1 or 2) was administered in 5 patients; CDDP (10–15 mg/m²/day, days 1–5) and epirubicin (epi-ADM) (10–15 mg/m²/day, days 1–5) was administered in 2 patients; and carboplatin (CBDCA) (200–400 mg/m²/day, day 1) and ADM (20–40 mg/m²/day, day 1 or 2) was administered in one patient. The responses were as follows: complete response in 2 patients (CDDP + ADM for lung metastasis, CDDP + epi-ADM for lymph node metastasis), partial response in 1 (CDDP + ADM for lymph node metastasis), stable disease in 2, and progressive disease in 3. A durable response was observed in 2 patients showing complete responses (58 and 112 months).

Conclusions

The clinical effect of the combination of platinum and anthracycline for metastatic CSCC was limited despite the findings of two patients showing durable complete responses.     

A phase II trial of prolonged,continuous infusion of low-dose gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma

Purpose

Low-dose, prolonged infusion of gemcitabine has effects similar to standard doses in several cancers. We evaluated the toxicity and efficacy of low-dose gemcitabine in prolonged infusion plus cisplatin in patients with advanced pleural mesothelioma.

Methods

Patients with mesothelioma received gemcitabine (250 mg/m²) in a 6-h infusion plus cisplatin (35 mg/m²) on days 1 and 8 every three weeks. We used the modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumours. This study is registered in clinical trials (NCT01869023).

Results

We included 39 patients; 82.1 % were low risk according to the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer prognostic group. Partial response was observed in 53.8 % (21/39), stable disease in 33.3 % (13/39) and progression in 12.8 % (5/39). The median progression-free survival was 6.9 months (95 % CI 3.2–10.6 months), and the associated factors were the EORTC risk and histology. The median overall survival was 20.7 months (95 % CI 10.7–30.8 months). The functional, physical and emotional roles and dyspnoea, insomnia and pain symptom scales improved. The most commonly graded 3/4 side effects were neutropenia (24.4 %), lymphopenia (14.6 %), thrombocytopenia (14.7 %) and anaemia (12.2 %).

Conclusions

Low-dose, prolonged gemcitabine infusion plus cisplatin has acceptable toxicity and high efficacy with improved quality of life, representing an affordable regimen for the low-income population.     

Phase II study of S-1, docetaxel and cisplatin combination chemotherapy in patients with unresectable metastatic gastric cancer

Purpose

We evaluated the activity and toxicity of docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 (DCS) combination chemotherapy in patients with unresectable metastatic gastric cancer.

Methods

Patients with histologically proven, unresectable metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma, performance status (PS) 0–2, and no prior chemotherapy were eligible. Patients received oral S-1 (40 mg/m² b.i.d.) on days 1–14 and intravenous cisplatin (60 mg/m²) and docetaxel (60 mg/m²) on day 8 every 3 weeks.

Results

Thirty-four patients were enrolled between March 2005 and April 2007. Three patients were considered ineligible and did not receive the DSC therapy. Clinical characteristics were as follows: median age, 63 years (range, 44–77); PS, 0/1/2: 23/8/0; women/men, 8/23; and well-differentiated/undifferentiated adenocarcinoma, 10/21. The objective response rate was 87.1% with 1 complete response (3.2%) and 26 partial responses (83.9%) in 31 assessable patients. Four had stable disease (12.9%) but none had progressive disease. Of these 27 responders, 8 (25.8%) achieved downstaging and 7 (22.6%) underwent curative surgery. The median survival time and progression-free survival were 687 days [confidence interval (95% CI), 600.0–1,138.1] and 226 days (95% CI, 182.5–379.3), respectively. Most common grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity was neutropenia (77.4%). Most common grade 3 nonhematologic toxicities included anorexia (35.5%) and nausea (32.3%). All treatment-related toxicities resolved, and no toxic deaths were observed.

Conclusions

DCS combination chemotherapy is highly active against unresectable metastatic gastric cancer and can be given safely with proper management of adverse events. Further studies of this combination are warranted.