Nationwide Survey for Current Status of Laboratory Diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Korea

BackgroundThe interest in Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) has increased, and the choice of assays became wider since the first national survey in Korea on CDI diagnosis in 2015. We conducted a survey of the domestic CDI assays with more varied questions to understand the current situation in Korea.MethodsIn April 2018, about 50 questions on the current status of CDI assays and details on implementation and perceptions were written, and a survey questionnaire was administered to laboratory medicine specialists in 200 institutions.ResultsOne-hundred and fifty institutions responded to the questionnaire, of which 90 (60.0%) including one commercial laboratory, performed CDI assays. The toxin AB enzyme immunoassay (toxin AB EIA), nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT), and C. difficile culture, glutamate dehydrogenase assay, alone or in combination with other assays, were used in 75 (84.3%), 52 (58.4%), 35 (36.0%), and 23 (25.8%), respectively, and 65 (73.0%) institutions performed a combination of two or more assays. The sensitivity of toxin AB EIA was more negatively perceived, and that on specificity was more positively perceived. The perception of sensitivity and specificity of NAAT was mostly positive. Perception on the algorithm test projected it as useful but in need of countermeasures. Sixty-three (73.3%) institutions responded that they performed surveillance on CDI.ConclusionThis study provides useful evidence on the current status of CDI laboratory diagnosis in Korea as well as on items that require improvement and is thought to aid in standardizing and improving the CDI laboratory diagnosis in Korea.     

Molecular characterization of Clostridioides difficile ribotype 027 in a major Chinese hospital

BackgroundThe rapid spread of C. difficile 027 has become one of the leading threats of healthcare-associated infections wordwild. However, C. difficile 027 infections have rarely been reported in China. The objective of this study was to strengthen the understanding of the molecular characterizations of C. difficile 027 in China.MethodsIn this study, stool specimens from 176 suspected CDI cases were collected from 1 Jan 2018 to 30 Jun 2019. These specimens were measured by GeneXpert test and C.difficile colonies were identified and analyzed.ResultsThere were five samples positive for tcdA, tcdB, binary toxin genes and had deletions in tcdC gene. These five Clostridioides difficile isolates belonged to ST1 and confirmed as Clostridioides difficile 027 strains by PCR ribotyping. Through using whole genome sequencing, , we found that these five strains were closely clustered into the same predominant evolutionary branch and were highly similar to C. difficile 027 strain R20291. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing result showed they were highly resistant to fluoroquinolones.ConclusionsIn Our study, five C. difficile 027 isolates were identified and characterized using MLST, PCR ribotyping and whole genome sequencing. We proposed that C. difficile 027 infections are probably neglected in China. Further epidemiological studies across the country together with the introduction of routine diagnostic testing and multi-center or national level surveillance are needed to ascertain the size of this potentially significant problem.     

Relationship between remote cholecystectomy and incident Clostridioides difficile infection

ObjectivesCholecystectomy (CCY) is associated with increased faecal levels of secondary bile acids. Secondary bile acids confer resistance to Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI, formerly Clostridium difficile infection) in animal studies. This study tested the hypothesis that CCY confers protection against CDI by increasing gut levels of secondary bile acids.MethodsThis was a retrospective case–control study. Adults hospitalized between January 2010 and June 2017 at our institution were included. CDI cases were defined as a positive stool PCR followed by anti-CDI treatment and were matched 1:1:1 with two control groups (those who tested negative for CDI and those who were not tested for CDI) by sex, age group, body mass index (BMI), and exposure to antibiotics. CCY was defined as a history of CCY at least 6 months prior to the index C. difficile test or the index admission date in the untested controls. Conditional logistic regression modelling was used to estimate the relationship between remote CCY and risk for CDI.ResultsThe final study population was 7077 (2359 CDI cases, 2359 matched controls without CDI, and 2359 matched controls not tested for CDI). Rates of remote CCY did not differ among the three groups (14.4% vs. 15.5% vs. 14.2%) and this result was unchanged after adjusting for additional clinical factors (adjusted OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.76–1.06 comparing CDI cases vs. matched controls without CDI; adjusted OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.78–1.39 comparing CDI cases vs. matched controls not tested for CDI).ConclusionsThere was no association between remote CCY and risk for CDI.     

Proton pump inhibitor use and risk for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

ObjectivesProton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy is a potentially modifiable risk factor for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). Citing an absence of clinical trials, many guidelines do not provide recommendations for addressing PPI management. Our aim was to perform an updated systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the association between PPI use and recurrent CDI addressing prior methodological limitations.MethodsData sources were MEDLINE and EMBASE. Eligible studies were cohort and case–control studies; there were no restrictions on study setting or duration of follow-up. Participants were adults with prior CDI who did or did not receive PPI therapy and were assessed for recurrent CDI. Summary (unadjusted) odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random effects model. Prespecified subgroup analyses were performed to explore heterogeneity including study design, study quality, duration of follow-up, adjustment for confounders, and outcome definition.ResultsSixteen studies were included in the meta-analysis, comprising 57 477 patients with CDI, of whom 6870 (12%) received PPIs. The rate of recurrent CDI was 24% in patients treated with PPIs versus 18% in those who were not. A meta-analysis that pooled unadjusted odds ratios demonstrated higher odds of recurrent CDI in patients who received PPIs (OR 1.69, 95%CI 1.46–1.96) versus those who did not. There was moderate heterogeneity between studies (I² 56%); however, a sensitivity analysis restricted to studies with 56 days of follow-up substantially reduced the heterogeneity (OR 1.59, 95%CI 1.36–1.85; I² 12%). An analysis restricted to multivariate studies that combined adjusted ORs also demonstrated higher odds of recurrent CDI in patients who received PPIs (OR 1.49, 95%CI 1.12–2.00). No publication bias was identified.ConclusionsWe found significantly higher odds of recurrent CDI among users of PPIs that persisted across multiple sensitivity analyses. These results support stronger recommendations for PPI stewardship at CDI diagnosis.     

Clinical Impact of Empirical Antibiotic Therapy in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Requiring Oxygen Therapy

Despite the low prevalence of secondary bacterial infection in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients, most of them were administered antibiotic therapy empirically. However, the prognostic impact of empirical antibiotic therapy has not been evaluated. We conducted retrospective propensity score-matched case-control study of 233 COVID-19 patients with moderate to severe illnesses who required oxygen therapy and evaluated whether empirical antibiotic therapy could improve clinical outcomes. Empirical antibiotic therapy did not improve clinical outcomes including length of stay, days with oxygen requirement, the proportion of patients with increased oxygen demand, the proportion of patients who required mechanical ventilation, and overall mortality. This finding implies that routine administration of antibiotics for the treatment of COVID-19 is not essential and should be restricted.     

Incidence,Epidemiology and Control of Clostridium difficile Infection in a Tertiary Care Private Hospital in India

Purpose: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a serious healthcare-associated infection (HAI) now being increasingly reported from hospitals across India. However, there is a paucity of data on the incidence of and impact of control measures on CDI in India. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective study conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Mumbai from January 2016 to December 2017. All patients with healthcare-onset diarrhoea were tested for C. difficile by glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH)/toxin assay or nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT). CDI was defined as either GDH and toxin positive or NAAT positive. The incidence of CDI was calculated per 1000 patient days. Demographic features of patients with CDI including age, sex, duration of hospitalisation before onset of CDI, antibiotic use and treatment administered were summarised. Results: A total of 67 patients had CDI in the study period with a mean incidence of 0.2/1000 patient days. A halving of the CDI incidence was seen after intensification of the CDI prevention bundle. The mean age of affected patients was 64 years and CDI occurred at a median duration of 2 weeks after hospitalisation. Eighty-seven per cent of the patients were on antibiotics at the time of diagnosis of CDI. The crude mortality rate was 22%. Conclusions: CDI is an emerging HAI in India. All hospitals need to set up policies for surveillance, testing, treatment and prevention of CDI based on recent international guidelines and local infrastructure/logistics.     

Development of the Korean Standardized Antimicrobial Administration Ratio as a Tool for Benchmarking Antimicrobial Use in Each Hospital

BackgroundThe Korea National Antimicrobial Use Analysis System (KONAS), a benchmarking system for antimicrobial use in hospitals, provides Korean Standardized Antimicrobial Administration Ratio (K-SAAR) for benchmarking. This article describes K-SAAR predictive models to enhance the understanding of K-SAAR, an important benchmarking strategy for antimicrobial usage in KONAS.MethodsWe obtained medical insurance claims data for all hospitalized patients aged ≥ 28 days in all secondary and tertiary care hospitals in South Korea (n = 347) from January 2019 to December 2019 from the Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service. Modeling was performed to derive a prediction value for antimicrobial use in each institution, which corresponded to the denominator value for calculating K-SAAR. The prediction values of antimicrobial use were modeled separately for each category, for all inpatients and adult patients (aged ≥ 15 years), using stepwise negative binomial regression.ResultsThe final models for each antimicrobial category were adjusted for different significant risk factors. In the K-SAAR models of all aged patients as well as adult patients, most antimicrobial categories included the number of hospital beds and the number of operations as significant factors, while some antimicrobial categories included mean age for inpatients, hospital type, and the number of patients transferred from other hospitals as significant factors.ConclusionWe developed a model to predict antimicrobial use rates in Korean hospitals, and the model was used as the denominator of the K-SAAR.     

Molecular typing of Clostridioides difficile isolates from clinical and non‐clinical samples in Iran

Clostridioides difficile is a major cause of nosocomial infectious diarrhea in hospitalized patients throughout the world. We aimed to characterize C. difficile isolates among hospitalized patients, hospital staffs, and hospital environment samples obtained in three tertiary care hospitals of Iran with regard to their molecular types between June 2016 and November 2017. The toxigenicity of C. difficile isolates was determined by toxigenic culture and multiplex‐PCR. Toxigenic C. difficile isolates collected were ribotyped using capillary gel electrophoresis‐based PCR and the database of WEBRIBO ( http://webribo.ages.at ). Of 500 clinical and non‐clinical samples, toxigenic C. difficile were identified in 35 of 250 stool samples (14%) and in 3 of 250 swabs (1.2%). The most frequently found ribotypes (RTs) were 039, AI‐12, and AI‐21 (15.8, 10.52, and 10.52% of all isolates, respectively). Further RTs were: 017, 001, AI‐3, AI‐15, AI‐18, AI‐10, AI‐4, and PR21195 (as new ribotype). The epidemic RTs (027 and 078) seen in the Europe, North America, and Asia were completely absent in this study.     

Universal screening for Clostridioides difficile in a tertiary hospital: risk factors for carriage and clinical disease

ObjectivesThe role of asymptomatic carriers in Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) epidemiology is not fully understood. Our aim was to evaluate CD carriage prevalence on admission, associated risk factors, and the risk of developing CDI.MethodsA 10-week surveillance program for CD carriage of all medical patients admitted to the Sheba Medical Centre was implemented, utilizing an admission rectal swab PCR. Healthcare facility-onset CDI (HO-CDI) was recorded and divided into HO-CDI diagnosed in CD carriers and non-carriers.ResultsA total of 4601 admissions were recorded in 3803 patients; 2368 patients had technically analysable rectal swabs, of whom 81 (3.4%) were CD carriers. A multivariate logistic regression model showed that previous hospitalization, old age (>85 years) and low Norton scores were significant independent predictors of CD carriage. Carriers were more likely to receive antimicrobial therapy during hospitalization than non-carriers were. The incidence of HO-CDI in non-carriers was 4.6 cases per 10 000 patient-days; the incidence of HO-CDI in carriers was 76.7 cases per 10 000 patient-days (RR 16.6, 95% CI 4.0–69.1, p .002).ConclusionsIn a prospective study, the rate of CD carriage on admission in medical patients was 3.4%. CD carriers were older, frailer, and more likely to have been hospitalized recently. HO-CDI incidence was significantly higher among CD carriers than among non-carriers, with at least a third of CDI in screened patients developing in carriers. Targeted screening of high-risk groups for CD carriage should be further considered.     

Antibiotic prescribing in patients with COVID-19: rapid review and meta-analysis

BackgroundThe proportion of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 that are prescribed antibiotics is uncertain, and may contribute to patient harm and global antibiotic resistance.ObjectiveThe aim was to estimate the prevalence and associated factors of antibiotic prescribing in patients with COVID-19.Data SourcesWe searched MEDLINE, OVID Epub and EMBASE for published literature on human subjects in English up to June 9 2020.Study Eligibility CriteriaWe included randomized controlled trials; cohort studies; case series with ≥10 patients; and experimental or observational design that evaluated antibiotic prescribing.ParticipantsThe study participants were patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, across all healthcare settings (hospital and community) and age groups (paediatric and adult).MethodsThe main outcome of interest was proportion of COVID-19 patients prescribed an antibiotic, stratified by geographical region, severity of illness and age. We pooled proportion data using random effects meta-analysis.ResultsWe screened 7469 studies, from which 154 were included in the final analysis. Antibiotic data were available from 30 623 patients. The prevalence of antibiotic prescribing was 74.6% (95% CI 68.3–80.0%). On univariable meta-regression, antibiotic prescribing was lower in children (prescribing prevalence odds ratio (OR) 0.10, 95% CI 0.03–0.33) compared with adults. Antibiotic prescribing was higher with increasing patient age (OR 1.45 per 10 year increase, 95% CI 1.18–1.77) and higher with increasing proportion of patients requiring mechanical ventilation (OR 1.33 per 10% increase, 95% CI 1.15–1.54). Estimated bacterial co-infection was 8.6% (95% CI 4.7–15.2%) from 31 studies.ConclusionsThree-quarters of patients with COVID-19 receive antibiotics, prescribing is significantly higher than the estimated prevalence of bacterial co-infection. Unnecessary antibiotic use is likely to be high in patients with COVID-19.     

Identification and validation of two peptide markers for the recognition of Clostridioides difficile MLST-1 and MLST-11 by MALDI-MS

ObjectivesClostridioides difficile infection (CDI) has become the main cause of nosocomial infective diarrhoea. To survey and control the spread of different C. difficile strains, there is a need for suitable rapid tests. The aim of this study was to identify peptide/protein markers for the rapid recognition of C. difficile strains by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS).MethodsWe analysed 44 well-characterized strains, belonging to eight different multi-locus sequence types (MLST), using ultrahigh-resolution Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance (FTICR) MS. The amino acid sequence of two peptide markers specific for MLST-1 and MLST-11 strains was elucidated by MALDI-TOF-MS/MS. The investigation of 2689 C. difficile genomes allowed the determination of the sensitivity and specificity of these markers. C18-solid-phased extraction was used to enrich the MLST-1 marker.ResultsTwo peptide markers (m/z 4927.81 and m/z 5001.84) were identified and characterized for MLST-1 and MLST-11 strains, respectively. The MLST-1 marker was found in 786 genomes of which three did not belong to MLST-1. The MLST-11 marker was found in 319 genomes, of which 14 did not belong to MLST-11. Importantly, all MLST-1 and MLST-11 genomes were positive for their respective marker. Furthermore, a peptide marker (m/z 5015.86) specific for MLST-15 was found in 59 genomes. We translated our findings into a fast and simple method that allowed the unambiguous identification of the MLST-1 marker on a MALDI-TOF-MS platform.ConclusionsMALDI-FTICR MS-based peptide profiling resulted in the identification of peptide markers for C. difficile MLST-1 and MLST-11.     

Survey of Incidence of Clostridium difficile Infection in Canadian Hospitals and Diagnostic Approaches

A questionnaire relating to Clostridium difficile disease incidence and diagnostic practices was sent to 380 Canadian hospitals (all with >50 beds). The national questionnaire response rate was 63%. In-house testing was performed in 17.6, 61.5, and 74.2% of the hospitals with <300, 300 to 500, and >500 beds, respectively. The average test positivity rates were 17.2, 15.3, and 13.2% for hospitals with <300, 300 to 500, and >500 beds, respectively. The average disease incidences were 23.5, 30.8, and 40.3 cases per 100,000 patient days in the hospitals with <300, 300 to 500, and >500 beds, respectively. In the 81 hospitals where in-house testing was performed, cytotoxin testing utilizing tissue culture was most common (44.4%), followed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (38.3%), culture for toxigenic C. difficile (32.1%), and latex agglutination (13.6%). The clinical criteria for C. difficile testing were variable, with 85% of hospitals indicating that a test was done automatically if ordered by a doctor. Our results show that C. difficile-associated diarrhea is a major problem in hospitals with ≥200 beds. Despite a lower disease incidence in smaller hospitals, there was a higher diagnostic test positivity rate. This may reflect the preference of smaller hospitals for culture and latex agglutination tests.     

Clostridium difficile Infection after Adult Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation: A Multicenter Study of Epidemiology and Risk Factors

We sought to describe the epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) among adult recipients of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) within the first year after HSCT in centers with variable epidemiology of hypertoxigenic strains. A multicenter, retrospective nested case-control study was conducted among 873 auto-HSCT recipients at Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHH) and Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont (HMR) between January 2003 and December 2008. Despite center differences in the prevalence of NAP-1 strains during the study period (21% to 43% at JHH versus 80% to 84% in HMR), the 1-year incidence of CDI was similar in the 2 hospitals (6.2% at JHH versus 5.7% at HMR). The median time to infection was 11 days (interquartile range, 1 to 27 days). In case-control analyses, grade ≥2 mucositis (odds ratio [OR], 3.00; P = .02) and receipt of a fourth-generation cephalosporin (OR, 2.76; P = .04) were identified as predictors for CDI. Mucositis was the strongest predictor of risk for CDI in multivariate analysis (adjusted OR, 2.77; P = .03). CDI is a common and early complication of auto-HSCT. Treatment-related gastrointestinal mucosal damage, along with the potentially modifiable risk of antimicrobial exposure, influence the risk for CDI early after auto-HSCT.     

Transmission of Clostridium difficile spores in isolation room environments and through hospital beds

The aim of this study was to determine the dissemination of Clostridium difficile (CD) spores in a hospital setting where the potassium monopersulfate‐based disinfectant Virkon^TM was used for cleaning. In the initial part of the study, we sampled 16 areas of frequent patient contact in 10 patient rooms where a patient with CD infection (CDI) had been accommodated. In the second part of the study, we obtained samples from 10 patient beds after discharge of CDI patients, both before and after the beds were cleaned. In the first part, CDspores were isolated in only 30% of the rooms. In the second part, which focused on transmission to hospital beds, C. difficile was found in four of 10 beds either before or after cleaning. In conclusion, in both parts of the study, we demonstrated a moderate spread of CD spores to the environment despite routine cleaning procedures involving Virkon^TM.     

Recommendations and guidelines for the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection in Taiwan

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a major enteric disease associated with antibiotic use and a leading cause of hospital-acquired infections worldwide. This is the first guideline for treatment of CDI in Taiwan, aiming to optimize medical care for patients with CDI. The target audience of this document includes all healthcare personnel who are involved in the medical care of patients with CDI. The 2018 Guidelines Recommendations for Evidence-based Antimicrobial agents use in Taiwan (GREAT) working group was formed, comprising of infectious disease specialists from 13 medical centers in Taiwan, to review the evidence and draft recommendations using the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) methodology. A nationwide expert panel reviewed the recommendations during a consensus meeting in March 2019. The recommendation is endorsed by the Infectious Diseases Society of Taiwan (IDST). This guideline describes the epidemiology and risk factors of CDI, and provides recommendations for treatment of CDI in both adults and children. Recommendations for treatment of the first episode of CDI, first recurrence, second and subsequent recurrences of CDI, severe CDI, fulminant CDI, and pediatric CDI are provided.     

Oral Vancomycin Prophylaxis as Secondary Prevention Against Clostridioides difficile Infection in the Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Hematologic Malignancy Population

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a common complication in the hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and hematologic malignancy (HM) population. CDI is associated with increased hospital length of stay, health care and societal costs, morbidity, and mortality. Identifying strategies for secondary prevention of CDI is of extreme importance in the HSCT/HM population. In this study, our primary objective was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of an oral vancomycin prophylaxis (OVP) protocol for secondary prevention of CDI in a retrospective cohort of adult autologous/allogeneic HSCT recipients and patients with HM who did not undergo HSCT with a first CDI episode treated with concomitant broad-spectrum antibiotics (BSA). Patients were diagnosed and treated for CDI as inpatients and/or outpatients and were divided into 2 groups based on a preprotocol versus postprotocol analysis: the OVP group, comprising patients who received planned monotherapy with oral vancomycin 125 mg every 6 hours for 14 days for a first episode of CDI and subsequently received OVP posttreatment and a no OVP (NOVP) group, comprising patients who received planned monotherapy with oral vancomycin 125 mg every 6 hours for 14 days for a first episode of CDI and subsequently did not receive OVP posttreatment. OVP was defined as vancomycin 125 mg every 12 hours for up to 7 days after BSA discontinuation. The primary endpoint was recurrent CDI (rCDI), defined as symptoms of loose stools/diarrhea with high clinical suspicion for CDI prompting empiric therapy within 60 days of completion of treatment/prophylaxis for the first CDI episode. The incidence of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal (VRE) infection and 60-day mortality were also compared between the 2 groups. Multivariate logistic regression was created from associated variables to identify independent associations with rCDI. A total of 50 patients were included, 21 in the OVP group (42%) and 29 in the NOVP group (58%). The mean patient age was 58 years, and the cohort was 60% male and 86% Caucasian. HSCT was performed in 60% of the patients, and 76% of CDI cases were diagnosed during hospitalization. The rate of rCDI was significantly lower in the OVP group compared with the NOVP group (5% [1 of 21] versus 35% [10 of 29]; P= .016), with no subsequent increase in VRE infection rate (14% [3 of 21] versus 10% [3 of 29]; P = .686). By multivariable logistic regression, rCDI was inversely associated with OVP (odds ratio [OR], .14; 95% confidence interval [CI], .007 to .994; P = .049) and directly associated with outpatient CDI diagnosis (OR, 8.72; 95% CI, 1.816 to 49.158; P = .007). No between-group differences were found in 60-day mortality (10% [2 of 21] for OVP versus 7% [2 of 29] for NOVP; P > 0.999). OVP appears to be safe and effective for secondary prevention of CDI in the HSCT/HM population. Prospective trials are needed to validate the effectiveness of OVP in this vulnerable population to prevent rCDI.