Contralateral motor automatisms in neocortical temporal lobe epilepsy

BACKGROUND: The lateralizing value of the motor automatisms is generally doubted in most patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. However, subgroup analysis of the seizures of temporal lobe origin suggests a role for motor automatisms in discriminating seizures of neocortical versus mesial temporal lobe origin. METHODS: Video-EEG of a patient with well-defined neocortical temporal lobe epilepsy was reviewed to assess the localizing value of motor automatisms. RESULTS: We report a patient with left upper extremity motor automatisms and clonic movements of the proximal left lower extremity with altered awareness as the sole manifestations of right temporal neocortical seizures. CONCLUSION: Early onset unilateral motor automatisms without dystonic posturing can localize the seizure origin to the contralateral temporal lobe neocortex.     

Lateralizing value of postictal automatisms in temporal lobe epilepsy

PURPOSE: To describe clinical characteristics and lateralizing value of postictal automatisms in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). METHODS: One hundred and ninety-three videotaped seizures of 55 consecutive patients with refractory TLE and postoperatively seizure-free outcome were analyzed. Ictal as well as postictal (manual, oral and speech) automatisms were monitored. RESULTS: Thirty-four (62%) of the 55 patients showed PA at least once during their seizures. Postictal automatism was observed in 70 (36%) attacks as manual (21%), oral (13%) or speech (9%) automatisms. Fifteen seizures contained a combination of two different postictal automatisms. The presence of postictal oral automatisms did not lateralize the seizure onset zone (p=0.834). Speech automatisms (repetitive verbal behavior) occurred more frequently after left-sided seizures (p=0.002). Postictal unilateral manual automatism showed no lateralizing value occurring by the ipsilateral hand in 10 and the contralateral upper limb in 6 seizures (p=0.454). CONCLUSION: : Postictal automatism is a relatively frequent phenomenon in TLE. Postictal speech automatism lateralizes the seizure onset zone to the left hemisphere. Our observation can help the presurgical evaluation of TLE because verbal perseveration frequently occurs spontaneously, even in seizures without appropriate postictal language testing.     

Semiology of Temporal Lobe Seizures: Value in Lateralizing the Seizure Focus

Summary: Purpose: To determine the lateralizing value of the clinical manifestations of seizures in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), we made a retrospective videotape analysis of complex partial seizures (CPS) in 55 patients who underwent temporal lobectomy and were seizure-free postopera-tively for >2 years. Methods: Blinded to clinical details, we reviewed videotapes from video-EEG telemetry monitoring with attention paid to seizure semiology. Results: Useful lateralizing features included unilateral clonic activity (with the seizure focus contralateral in all patients), unilateral dystonic or tonic posturing (with the seizure focus contralateral in 90 and 86%, respectively), unilateral automatisms (with the seizure focus ipsilateral in 80%), and ictal speech preservation (with the seizure focus contralateral to the language-dominant hemisphere in 80%). Versive head rotation occurring ≤10 s before seizures secondarily generalized consistently predicted a contralateral focus. Seizure manifestations less predictive but suggestive of lateralization included ictal speech arrest and postictal speech status, with predictive values of 67%. Seizure manifestations not providing reliable lateralizing information included eye deviation, type of aura, and versive head movements occurring at times other than immediately before seizures secondarily generalized. Conclusions: In TLE, several clinical seizure manifestations are useful in lateralizing the seizure focus, although some provide no reliable information. Therefore, ictal semiology can assist in the evaluation of patients for seizure surgery, providing additional information in the lateralization of TLE.     

Ictal automatisms with preserved responsiveness in a patient with left mesial temporal lobe epilepsy

PURPOSE: To describe the possible mechanism of ictal automatisms with preserved responsiveness (APRs) in a patient with left mesial temporal lobe epilepsy, which had not been reported previously. METHODS: Ictal EEGs recorded from bilateral foramen ovale electrodes with scalp-sphenoidal electrodes were analyzed in respect to the ictal semiology. RESULTS: The patient had a right hemispheric language dominance in the dextral. Electroclinical analysis revealed that the onset of oroalimentary automatisms coincided with the involvement of the left mesial and lateral temporal structures by spreading ictal discharges. The ictal discharge spreading was limited to the ipsilateral hemisphere throughout the seizure, which explained the intact consciousness and preserved responsiveness of the patient. CONCLUSIONS: This case suggests that APRs take place in seizures originating from the nondominant temporal lobe, during which ipsilateral mesial and lateral temporal structures are diffusely involved without spreading to the contralateral side.     

Nonmanipulative proximal upper extremity automatisms lateralize contralaterally in temporal lobe epilepsy

Purpose : Upper extremity automatisms are considered to be an ipsilateral seizure lateralizing sign in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). Herein we describe different types of contralateral upper extremity automatisms (CUEAs). Methods : One hundred ninety‐three video–(electroencephalography) EEG recordings of 59 patients were reviewed. Other than two patients who refused surgery, all patients underwent standardized temporal lobectomy with favorable postoperative outcome. Fifty‐seven seizures of 21 patients were selected with CUEAs. We evaluated their electroclinical characteristics and their relation to other lateralizing motor symptoms. Results : Two types of CUEAs were observed. Nonmanipulative, proximal upper extremity automatisms were seen unilaterally and contralaterally to the operated side. These automatisms were rhythmic; repetitive; and often occurred with a circulatory component resembling waving, flaunting, circling, or stirring movements. They occurred in 29 seizures (15%) of 11 patients (19%), in most seizures in the first half of the seizure, and never postictally, in various time sequences and combined with dystonic/tonic posturing or limb immobility. Manipulative/distal type of CUEAs occurred in 11 seizures (6%) of 7 patients (12%) on the unexpected contralateral side. These CUEAs were seen in all phases of the seizures, including in the postictal state. Discussion : Nonmanipulative unilateral proximal upper extremity automatism is a reliable lateralizing sign to the contralateral hemisphere in TLE. This sign may be pathophysiologically related to dystonic/tonic posturing. Manipulative distal automatisms have less lateralizing value.     

Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Subtypes: Differential Patterns of Cerebral Perfusion on Ictal SPECT

Summary: Purpose : We studied cerebral perfusion patterns in the various subtypes of TLE, as determined by pathology and good outcome after temporal lobectomy (as confirmation of temporal origin).
Methods : We studied clinical features and ictal technetium ^99m hexamethyl-propyleneamineoxime (99mTc-HM-PAO) single-photon emission-computed tomography (SPECT) in four subgroups of patients with intractable temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) treated with surgery: hippocampal sclerosis (group 1, n = 10), foreign-tissue lesion in mesial temporal lobe (group 2, n = 8), foreign-tissue lesion in lateral temporal lobe (group 3, n = 7), and normal temporal lobe tissue with good surgical outcome (group 4, n = 5).
Results : No major clinical differences in auras, complex partial seizures or postictal states were identified among the groups. Ictal SPECT showed distinct patterns of cerebral perfusion in these subtypes of TLE. In groups 1 and 2, hyperperfusion was seen in the ipsilateral mesial and lateral temporal regions. In group 3, hyperperfusion was seen bilaterally in the temporal lobes with predominant changes in the region of the lesion. Hyperperfusion was restricted to the ipsilateral anteromesial temporal region in group 4. Ipsilateral temporal hyperperfusion in mesial onset seizures can be explained by known anatomic projections between mesial structures and ipsilateral temporal neocortex. Bilateral temporal hyperperfusion in lateral onset seizures can be explained by the presence of anterior commissural connections between lateral temporal neocortex and the contralateral amygdala.
Conclusions : We conclude that the perfusion patterns seen on ictal SPECT are helpful for subclassification of temporal lobe seizures, whereas clinical features are relatively unhelpful. These perfusion patterns provide an insight into preferential pathways of seizure propagation in the subtypes of TLE.     

Electrical stimulation of the contralateral mesial temporal structure induces an ipsilateral seizure pattern in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy

PURPOSE: We examined the mode of seizure development induced by electrical stimulation in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. METHODS: Of 25 patients undergoing intracranial EEG evaluation and electrical stimulation ipsilateral to the presumed site of habitual seizure origin, 17 patients had additional stimulation studies on the contralateral temporal lobe. RESULTS: Fourteen of the 25 patients had seizures induced with ipsilateral stimulation, and two of the 17 patients had seizures with contralateral stimulation. Seizures induced by ipsilateral stimulation started in the ipsilateral temporal lobe, whereas those induced by contralateral stimulation originated from the ipsilateral temporal lobe structure and were identical to the habitual seizures. CONCLUSIONS: Electrical stimulation of the temporal lobe structure opposite the site of habitual seizure origin is said to induce a seizure rarely. However, according to our preliminary results, if contralateral stimulation elicits a habitual seizure in the ipsilateral temporal lobe, it might be considered additional confirmatory evidence of seizure lateralization.     

Ictal Contralateral Paresis in Complex Partial Seizures

Summary: Certain behaviors that occur during a complex partial seizure (CPS) are useful in lateralizing the side of seizure onset. In 5 (5.3%) of 94 consecutive patients with partial epilepsy, we observed ictal unilateral arm and hand paresis during 27 of 34 CPS. In all these seizures, this behavior occurred contralateral to an epileptogenic temporal lobe, as determined by video-EEG monitoring and surgical outcome. In 5 of the 27 seizures, an observer demonstrated that the paretic arm and hand were flaccid. None of these patients had postictal (Todd's) paralysis. In most of the seizures, the arm ipsilateral to seizure onset had simultaneous purposeful movements or automatisms, sometimes with awkward posturing. Ictal unilateral paresis is distinctly different from ictal dystonia or postictal paralysis and consistently lateralizes seizure onset to the contralateral temporal lobe. Recognition of this particular ictal behavior and comparison to other simultaneous behaviors can aid in the lateralization and possibly localization of the epileptogenic zone.     

Spatiotemporal relationship between seizure activity and interictal spikes in temporal lobe epilepsy.

PURPOSE: To analyze the spatio-temporal relationship between seizure propagation and interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) in patients with bitemporal epilepsy. METHODS: We investigated 18 adult patients with intractable temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) who had undergone continuous video-EEG monitoring during presurgical evaluation. Only those patients were selected who had independent IEDs over both temporal lobes. Two authors evaluated the ictal and interictal EEG data independently. RESULTS: We analyzed 52 lateralized seizures of 18 patients. Thirty-one seizures showed ipsilateral seizure spread exclusively, whereas in 21 seizures the contralateral hemisphere was also involved. In lateralized seizures without contralateral propagation, we found that spikes ipsilateral to the seizure onset occurred postictally in a greater ratio than preictally (P<0.001). In lateralized seizures with contralateral propagation, we found no significant changes in the postictal spike distribution. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings showed that the lateralization of IEDs may depend on the brain areas involved by the preceding seizures, suggesting that spikes can be influenced by the seizure activity, and are not independent signs of epileptogenicity.     

Automatisms with preserved responsiveness and ictal aphasia: contradictory lateralising signs during a dominant temporal lobe seizure.

The 25-year-old right-handed woman suffering from temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) was referred to our centre for presurgical evaluation. MRI showed a right-sided hippocampal sclerosis. During video-EEG-recorded seizures, abdominal aura was followed by oral automatisms, during which she was completely reactive to external stimuli, although she was unable to speak. Ictal EEG showed right temporal seizure pattern, without contralateral propagation. She had abnormal speech postictally. Speech-activated functional transcranial Doppler sonography revealed right-sided speech dominance. She has become seizure free after a right-sided amygdalo-hippocampectomy. In our patient, contradictory clinical ictal lateralising signs (automatisms with preserved responsiveness vs. ictal and postictal dysphasia) occurred during right-, speech-dominant-sided seizures. This is the first report when automatisms with preserved consciousness occurred during a seizure originating and involving the speech-dominant hemisphere.     

Association of ipsilateral motor automatisms and contralateral dystonic posturing: a clinical feature differentiating medial from neocortical temporal lobe epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: Clinical features that may help to differentiate medial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) from neocortical temporal lobe epilepsy (NTLE) are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the localizing and lateralizing value of the association of ipsilateral motor automatisms and contralateral dystonic posturing in patients with medically refractory temporal lobe epilepsy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Videotapes of 60 patients with well-defined MTLE, NTLE, or both were reviewed to assess the presence and the localizing value of unilateral dystonic posturing associated with motor automatisms. RESULTS: Twenty-eight of the 60 patients exhibited unilateral dystonic posturing. This sign was observed in patients with MTLE and NTLE. It was mostly contralateral to the seizure focus in patients with MTLE and exclusively ipsilateral in patients with NTLE. Unilateral motor automatisms occurred in 26 of the 60 patients with MTLE or NTLE. It was predominantly ipsilateral to the seizure focus in patients with MTLE and exclusively contralateral in patients with NTLE. The association of ipsilateral motor automatisms and contralateral dystonic posturing was found in 14 patients with MTLE but in none of the patients with NTLE. Two patients who had medial and neocortical seizure onset also exhibited this clinical feature. This association was not significantly correlated with the postoperative outcome in patients with MTLE. CONCLUSIONS: The association of ipsilateral motor automatisms and contralateral dystonic posturing may help to differentiate MTLE from NTLE with a reliable lateralizing value. This clinical association may reflect a specific pattern in the spread of the ictal discharge.     

Localizing Value of Seizure Manifestations of Temporal Lobe Epilepsies and the Consequence of Analyzing Their Sequential Appearance

We investigated the localizing and lateralizing value of principal seizure manifestations in temporal lobe epilepsies (signal symptoms, oroalimentary automatisms, somatomotor manifestations, unilateral dystonic posturing, ictal speech, motionless stare) of 223 complex partial seizures in 50 patients. All the patients had invasive long-term monitoring with the combined implantation of intracerebral electrodes in and subdural electrodes on the bilateral temporal lobes. Postoperative freedom from seizures was ascertained for longer than one year. We found that 35 patients had amygdalohippocampal seizures and 15 had lateral temporal seizures. The value of the manifestations was established in relation to the site and side of seizure origin and to the progression of seizure discharges within the unilateral temporal lobe or to the contralateral cerebral hemisphere. Several signs among the manifestations were found to be reliable in predicting the site or side of the temporal lobe seizure focus. We emphasized the importance of investigating sequential changes of seizure manifestations in relation to ictal EEG findings by means of simultaneous recording.     

Localized Cerebellar Hypometabolism in Patients with Complex Partial Seizures

Summary: Purpose : We sought to determine the cause of cerebellar dysfunction in epilepsy and whether this dysfunction was directly related to seizures.
Methods : Cerebellar metabolism was evaluated in 48 patients with a well-defined region of seizure onset and with corresponding hypometabolism. Regions of interest (ROI) were drawn according to a standardized template. If the ROI/honepileptogenic cortex count rate ratio was outside the 95% confidence interval (CI) of controls, the ROI was defined as abnormal. The ratios from cerebellar hemispheres (defined as ipsi- or contralateral to the seizure onset region), were compared among controls (n = 8); patients who had seizure onsets and corresponding hypometabolism mesially in a temporal lobe (patient group 1, n = 19); patients whose seizures had onset mesially in a temporal lobe but spread rapidly to the ipsilateral frontal lobe and who had hypometabolism both in the affected temporal lobe and frontal lobe (patient group 2, n = 23); and patients who had seizure onsets and corresponding hypometabolism in the frontal lobe (patient group 3, n = 6).
Results : Significant hypometabolism was noted in the contralateral cerebellum of patients in groups 2 and 3 [p = 0.007 and p = 0.008, respectively; two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)]. In contrast, patients in group 1 tended to have lower values in the ipsilateral cerebellum (p = 0.057).
Conclusions : The observed cerebellar changes are consistent with animal data showing that cerebellar connections to frontal lobes are numerous and crossed, whereas the connections to mesial temporal lobes are less abundant, bilateral, with an ipsilateral predominance. The difference between the two groups of patients with mesial temporal seizures suggests that cerebellar dysfunction in partial epilepsy, at least to a certain extent, is related to mechanisms involved in seizure generation and spread.     

The localizing and lateralizing value of ictal/postictal coughing in patients with focal epilepsies.

Postictal coughing has so far been reported to indicate a temporal origin of focal epilepsy. A trend towards non-dominant hemisphere lateralization and mesial temporal localization has been suggested. However, postictal coughing has also been reported in a few patients with extratemporal epilepsies. We have retrospectively evaluated the localizing and lateralizing value of ictal/postictal coughing in 197 patients with temporal and extratemporal epilepsy who received presurgical video-EEG long-term recordings from 1999 to 2001. There was no statistical significant difference in percentage of coughing patients in both groups. However, only patients belonging to the temporal group presented with coughing as a regular element of seizure semiology (simple partial and complex partial seizures) whereas in the extratemporal group coughing occurred more sporadically. Within the temporal group a statistically significant tendency to left-sided seizure onset and a statistically not significant preponderance of mesial seizure onset was observed. Additional vegetative signs were observed only in about half of the patients. These results suggest that coughing occurs in both temporal and extratemporal lobe epilepsy and may only be indicative of temporal lobe seizure onset if representing a regular semiologic element. Coughing may be due to two different mechanisms, one dependent and the other independent from additional vegetative symptoms.     

Spontaneous periictal leaving behavior: A potential lateralizing sign in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy

Purpose:   Seizure-related spontaneous leaving behavior (LB) is an uncommonly reported phenomenon. The aim of this study was to determine its frequency, clinical significance, and especially its lateralizing value.
Methods:   We analyzed retrospectively the spontaneous periictal LB occurring in complex partial seizures (CPS) of 138 patients with medically refractory mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) with excellent postoperative seizure outcome and pathologic finding of hippocampal sclerosis. The relation of LB occurring in different phases of CPS to the side of resection was investigated.
Results:   The overall frequency of periictal LB was 8.3% of 517 CPS and 25.2% of 123 patients. Among the 12 patients with ictal LB, 9 patients had epileptogenic focus ipsilateral to language dominant side, whereas the remaining 3 had seizure onset in the nondominant side. Conversely, 8 of 11 patients with postictal LB had foci in the nondominant side, and only three patients' seizures originated in the dominant side. Therefore, it was more likely for patients with left MTLE to show ictal LB and for those with right foci to display postictal LB (p = 0.03).
Conclusions:   LB may represent a potential lateralizing sign. When LB occurs ictally, it may indicate seizure onset in the dominant temporal lobe, and LB occurring postictally indicates nondominant side seizure onset in patients with MTLE.     

Significance of lateralization of upper limb automatisms in temporal lobe epilepsy: A quantitative movement analysis

Purpose: To evaluate the significance of lateralization of ictal upper limb automatisms in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). Methods: Ictal upper limb automatisms of 28 patients with temporal lobe epilepsy were quantified. Duration of automatisms in relation to total seizure duration, movement speed, extent, length, and predominant frequencies of the movements were analyzed for both upper extremities separately and compared to the lateralization of the epileptogenic temporal lobe. Results: Predominantly ipsilateral upper limb automatisms were more common (n = 19) than predominantly contralateral automatisms (n = 9). The duration of ictal ipsilateral upper limb automatisms was significantly longer than the duration of contralateral automatisms (ipsilateral automatisms: 29 of 86 s total seizure duration; contralateral automatisms: 19 of 110 s total seizure duration; p = 0.048). Patients with ipsilateral upper limb automatisms had more often exclusively unitemporal interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) (84.2%) than patients with contralateral automatisms (11.1%; p < 0.001). The positive predictive value (PPV) of the combination of these parameters is 84.2%. Excellent surgical seizure outcome was better in patients with ipsilateral upper limb automatisms (77.8%) compared to those with contralateral automatisms (20%) (p = 0.09). The quantitative analysis of movement extent, average speed, maximum speed, and repetition rate of ipsilateral and contralateral upper limb automatisms did not show any statistically significant difference in this patient sample. Conclusion: The lateralization of upper limb automatisms in TLE has a good lateralizing value if the lateralization of IEDs were also taken into consideration.     

Asymmetric ending of secondarily generalized seizures: a lateralizing sign in TLE

The authors investigated whether asymmetric ending of the clonic phase of secondarily generalized tonic clonic seizures (SGTCS) has lateralizing value concerning the hemisphere of seizure onset. They studied 70 patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy who underwent epilepsy surgery. Asymmetric ending of the clonic phase occurred in 43% of patients. The last clonic movement appeared on the upper extremity ipsilateral to the hemisphere of seizure onset in 83%.     

Intracranial EEG findings in patients with lesional lateral temporal lobe epilepsy

PURPOSE: Intracranial EEG in patients with lesional lateral temporal lobe epilepsy is rarely reported. Therefore, the number of patients with seizures arising independently from ipsilateral mesial structures or contralateral hemisphere has not been clarified. We analyzed the intracranial EEG of cases with localized lesion in the lateral temporal cortex. METHODS: We studied 15 patients who satisfied the following criteria: (1) MRI depicted a lesion less than 4cm in diameter located lateral to the collateral sulcus and at least 3cm posterior to the temporal pole; (2) intracranial EEG with electrodes placed on bilateral temporal lobes captured at least one complex partial seizure; and (3) postoperative follow-up period of 2 years or longer. The mean age of seizure onset was 16.6 years (range, 11-25) and that at surgery was 26.7 years (range, 16-36). RESULTS: A total of 147 complex partial seizures, 51 simple partial seizures, 16 secondarily generalized seizures, and over 80 subclinical seizures were recorded. On the lesional side, many clinical seizures were recorded from the lateral cortex. Independent of the lateral temporal onset seizures, ictal discharges originating from the mesial temporal structures were recorded in 7 of 15 patients (47%). Moreover, onset of ictal discharges from the contralateral temporal lobe was recorded in 7 of 15 patients (47%). Interictal spikes from ipsilateral mesial structures were recorded in all patients. The presence of ipsilateral mesial onset seizures was not associated with hippocampal neuron losses. CONCLUSION: Intracranial EEG analysis revealed that approximately one-half of the patients with structural lesions in the lateral cortex showed independent epileptogenic areas in ipsilateral mesial structures. Although ictal discharges originating from the contralateral temporal lobe were recorded in a half of these patients, this finding does not constitute a contraindication of resective surgery. Interictal spike is not an indicator of whether mesial structures should be resected.     

Electrode manipulation automatism during temporal lobe seizures.

OBJECTIVE: To describe clinical characteristics and lateralizing value of peri-ictal electrode manipulation automatism (EMA) in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) and compare our data with ictal manual automatisms described in the literature. METHODS: Two-hundred and five videotaped seizures of 55 consecutive patients with refractory TLE and postoperatively seizure-free outcome were analyzed and EMA (tugging, scratching or adjusting the electrodes and cables) were monitored. RESULTS: Twenty-eight (51%) patients showed EMA during 47 (23%) seizures. Ictal start was noted in 22 seizures and in 19/22 cases EMA finished before the end of seizure. Ictal EMAs were always associated with automotor seizure components. During 25 seizures, exclusively postictal EMAs were observed. Electrode manipulation was presented during 24/112 left-sided and 23/93 right-sided seizures (p = 0.742). Peri-ictal EMA was unilateral (completed by one hand) in 24/47 seizures (10 ictal, 14 postictal); it was done by the hand ipsilateral to the seizure onset zone in 17/24 and by contralateral hand in 7/24 cases (p = 0.064). We observed concomitant contralateral dystonic posturing during 3/10 seizures with unilateral ictal EMA. Unilateral hand automatism, temporally independent from the EMA appeared in 30 (64%) of the 47 seizures. CONCLUSION: Peri-ictal EMA is a frequent phenomenon but shows no lateralizing value in TLE. The mechanism of EMA is in many ways dissimilar from that of earlier described manual automatisms.     

Electrophysiology of Bimanual-Bipedal Automatisms

Summary: To determine the localizing value and electrophysiology of bimanual-bipedal automatisms (BBAs), we studied these behaviors in 54 seizures of 8 patients with temporal or frontal lobe seizure onset. BBAs occurred with a frequency of 27% in frontal lobe epilepsy (FLE) and of 7% in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). The distribution of electrode sites showing ictal activity during these automatisms was significantly different in the two patient groups (0.0001 Chi-square). Mesioand/or laterotemporal plus orbital frontal areas were involved areas when the behaviors appeared in patients with TLE; dorsolateral and mesiofrontal regions were the most commonly involved when the behaviors occurred during the course of frontal lobe seizures. We concluded that BBAs represent activation of frontal lobe circuitry but are not unique to seizures of frontal lobe origin. Eyelid flutter and repetitive body movements in either the axial or sagittal plane were significantly associated with the frontal lobe group whereas oral-alimentary automatisms were associated with the temporal lobe group. Thus, these associated behaviors may help indicate whether a frontal or temporal lobe seizure onset has occurred when BBAs are observed. A new concept of ictal expression is proposed to conform with the results as well as with other apparently disparate ictal behaviors that may have localizing value.