Is cross-femoral bypass grafting a disadvantage of aortomonoiliac endovascular aortic aneurysm repair?

PURPOSE: The need for cross-femoral bypass grafting (CFBG) is considered by some to be a major disadvantage of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with the aortomonoiliac technique. To determine the durability of CFBG in this setting, we examined data from 148 consecutive high-risk patients in a clinical trial of EVAR with a custom-made aortomonoiliac endovascular stent graft. METHODS: All data were collected prospectively. After hospital discharge, patients were evaluated at 1, 3, and 6 months and annually thereafter. All CFBG was constructed of expandable polytetrafluoroethylene. RESULTS: During follow-up averaging 23.6 +/- 16.2 months, nine CFBG complications developed in 8 patients (5.4%), including disruption (n = 2), infection (n = 3), thrombosis (n = 2), and pseudoaneurysm (n = 3). Four patients with CFBG complications died, of consequences of infection (n = 2), intracranial hemorrhage during attempted CFBG thrombolysis (n = 1), and intracranial hemorrhage during anticoagulation (n = 1). There were no amputations. At life table analysis, freedom from CFBG complication was 96.3% +/- 1.6% at 12 months, 94.1% +/- 2.2% at 24, 36, and 48 months, and 86.2% +/- 7.8% at 60 months. Overall survival for this high-risk patient group was 83.4% +/- 3.1% at 12 months, 70.4% +/- 4.1% at 24 months, 56.5% +/- 5.3% at 36 months, and 44.8% +/- 6.4% at 48 months. CONCLUSION: CFBG is durable, with a low rate of complications in patients undergoing aortomonoiliac EVAR. Need for CFBG should not discourage use of aortomonoiliac devices in patients with anatomy unfavorable for other EVAR approaches.     

Does endovascular aortic aneurysm repair justify a reduced cardiology work-up?

Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVAR) has been introduced as an alternative to open surgery with the purpose of reducing operative risk and improving survival. Since cardiac co-morbidity is a major risk factor for both the operative procedure and long-term survival, it seems worthwhile to compare the cardiac implication of the 2 procedures. If EVAR would indeed afford a cardioprotective effect, this could have clinical consequences. Preoperative cardiology work-up could be reduced and more high-risk patients could be treated. A review of the literature has been made focusing on studies that examined cardiology work-up and cardiac risk profile of EVAR and open surgery. Most literature data suggest that cardiac risk is indeed reduced with EVAR, since hemodynamic alterations are less severe, episodes of anaemia are less frequent, plasma catecholamine levels are lower and general anaesthesia can be avoided. There is no level I or II evidence that immediate or late cardiac complications are indeed reduced with EVAR. At present, there are not enough literature data on the cardiac implications of EVAR to justify a reduced preoperative cardiology work-up. Even if conclusive evidence was available that EVAR reduces operative cardiac risk, the value of preoperative cardiac screening and myocardial revascularisation would remain unchanged: the purpose of cardiology work-up is not only to reduce operative risk but also to improve long-term survival.     

The once-daily formulation of tacrolimus: a step forward in kidney transplantation?

Nonadherence is a critical issue in transplantation. Recently, Astellas designed a once-daily-extended release formulation of tacrolimus (Tac). Despite initial reports showing bioequivalence of Tac once-daily (Advagraf) with the original formulation requiring twice-daily intake (Tac twice-daily, Prograf), several groups have now shown a sustained decrease in Tac exposure upon conversion from Prograf to Advagraf. Here, we discuss the possible reasons for this observation and how it could affect the expected benefits of Advagraf, and we comment on the fact that a similar lack of bioequivalence might prevail with generic immunosuppressive drugs.     

Does a postimplantation syndrome following endovascular treatment of aortic aneurysms exist?

The postimplantation syndrome (PIS) is a weakly defined condition that has been observed following endovascular treatment of aortic aneurysms; the postulated criteria include significant leukocytosis, fever, and/or coagulation disturbances. Among the factors that are supposed to contribute to this syndrome are contact activation by the stent covering with consecutive endothelial activation. Associated clinical parameters of a PIS were perioperatively monitored in the postoperative phase in a total of 69 patients with infrarenal aortic aneurysms treated with Y-stent grafts. C-reactive protein (CRP)-levels, leukocyte concentrations, and body temperature curves were directly compared to those of 50 patients undergoing conventional transperitoneal aneurysm resection. A subgroup of 10 patients of the endovascular group was compared with 13 operated-on patients with regard to an ischemia-reperfusion syndrome of the lower extremities. The mediator determinations were performed on venous (femoral vein) as well as in systemic (arterial) blood samples. The incidence of temperature values above 38 degrees C was higher in patients following endovascular treatment (72%) compared to conventionally operated-on patients (28%). CRP levels were not significantly different within the first 8 post-operative days. During open surgery, significantly higher values for lactate and lower pH levels were observed (p<0.01), as well as higher 6 keto prostaglandin F1alpha (PGF1alpha) levels. There was a short peak of PGF1alpha during eventeration of the intestine during the operative procedure that could not be detected during endovascular manipulations. The clinical and biochemical parameters do not prove the presence of a PIS following endovascular treatment of aortic aneurysms. In contrast, during open surgery the unspecific inflammatory reaction is higher, but not long-lasting. In the future, the suggested phenomenon of a decreased antiinflammatory cytokine response during endovascular surgery needs to be further examined.     

Does a positive neural margin affect outcome in facial nerve grafting?

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine the effect of positive neural margins on subsequent facial nerve function following facial nerve grafting. METHODS: In this retrospective review, 19 patients had sacrifice of their facial nerve with immediate facial nerve grafting, 8 had positive neural margins, and 11 had negative neural margins. Facial nerve function was analyzed using the House-Brackman scale. RESULTS: In the first group (8 patients), 5 had positive proximal margins and 3 had positive distal neural margins. Outcome by House-Brackman score was III (2 patients), IV (3 patients), V (1 patient), and VI (2 patients). In the second group (no evidence of neural spread, 11 patients), outcome was III (3 patients), IV (2 patients), V (2 patients), and VI (4 patients). CONCLUSION: No significant difference in the outcome of facial nerve function was seen between these 2 groups. Facial nerve grafting should be considered in patients whose facial nerve is sacrificed, even when there is evidence of tumor in the perineurium at the margin of resection.     

Does Japanese coronary artery bypass grafting qualify as a global leader?

Since the introduction of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, Japanese cardiothoracic surgeons have made significant contributions to the continuing evolution of the procedure, particularly to progress in arterial conduits. In 1988, Kitamura et al. described the internal thoracic artery (ITA) as a "live" conduit for pediatric patients requiring CABG. Since then, the physiological and clinical characteristics of the ITA graft have been investigated and reported by numerous Japanese surgeons. Since the development of the use of the right gastroepiploic artery as a graft by Suma, Japanese surgeons have contributed significantly to its clinical usage worldwide. In the 21st century, energetic Japanese surgeons have been making every effort to improve their surgical outcomes by performing off-pump CABG. While only 15% of surgeons in Europe and North America use the off-pump technique, more than 60% of surgeons in Japan do so. Despite a much smaller surgical volume, Japanese surgeons have achieved comparable outcomes to those abroad. This also is attributable to the medical insurance system in Japan. In conclusion, CABG in Japan now qualifies as a global leader.     

Does yawning represent a transient arousal-shift during intravenous induction of general anesthesia?

Although yawning occurs frequently during the IV induction of general anesthesia, the significance of this response remains unknown. In this study, we induced 30 surgical patients with 4 mg/kg thiopental IV, and 30 patients with 2 mg/kg propofol IV. Thereafter, the occurrence of yawning was continuously assessed, as the only clinical end-point, for 1 min. The electroencephalographic bispectral index was monitored throughout the observation period. The criterion for an arousal response was a transient increase during a continuing decrease in the bispectral index value. On the basis of this criterion, the sensitivity and specificity of the yawning response as an arousal sign were 77% and 80%, respectively. If a patient exhibited a yawning response, the chance of arousal was 84% (positive predictive value). With no yawning response, the chance of nonarousal was 71% (negative predictive value). According to simple logistic regression, the yawning response was predictive of a transient arousal-shift with an odds ratio of 13.5 (95% confidence interval: 3.8-48; P < 0.001). The occurrence of a yawning response during IV induction may be a clinical indicator of a transient arousal-shift during progressive loss of consciousness. IMPLICATIONS: Yawning elicited by IV anesthetic induction was related to a transient increase during the continuing decrease in the electroencephalographic bispectral index value (sensitivity and specificity, 77% and 80%, respectively). This type of yawning may be a clinical indicator of a transient arousal-shift during progressive loss of consciousness.     

Surgical repair and stent positioning for type A acute aortic dissection: a step forward?

We report two cases of type A acute aortic dissection in which the traditional ascending aorta replacement was completed by aortic arch stenting to achieve a complete treatment and to avoid the risks that are connected to aortic arch replacement. Correct deployment of the stent was evaluated through an endoscope inserted in the transverse arch, which avoided fluoroangiography and the involvement of a radiologic team.     

Does transradial cardiac catheterization affect coronary artery bypass grafting?

Recent technological advances have enabled the miniaturization of catheters for coronary angiography and intervention. As a result of this advancement, the transradial approach is becoming more popular. The advantages of this approach include a lower incidence of access site complications, earlier patient ambulation, improved patient satisfaction, and lower cost. The cardiologists of our institute have introduced this technique without delay and have taken the initiative in Japan. However, there are concerns regarding the effect of transradial cardiac catheterization on the condition of radial artery grafts for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). In this study, we evaluated the influence of transradial catheterization on CABG. We retrospectively evaluated 157 patients who had undergone CABG using the radial artery. The condition of the grafts was assessed intraoperatively. Postoperative coronary angiography was carried out 3 months after the surgical intervention. The patency of the grafts was assessed by 2 cardiologists. One-quarter of the radial artery grafts were affected by transradial catheterization. Since most of them were located only at the puncture site, the graft itself was capable of being used for grafting after the resection of its affected distal end. The patency rate was not affected by transradial catheterization.     

Does the endovascular repair of aortoiliac aneurysms pose a radiation safety hazard to vascular surgeons?

OBJECTIVES: Endovascular aortoiliac aneurysm (EAIA) repair uses substantial fluoroscopic guidance that requires considerable radiation exposure. Doses were determined for a team of three vascular surgeons performing 47 consecutive EAIA repairs over a 1-year period to determine whether this exposure constitutes a radiation hazard. METHODS: Twenty-nine surgeon-made aortounifemoral devices and 18 bifurcated devices were used. Three surgeons wore dosimeters (1) on the waist, under a lead apron; (2) on the waist, outside a lead apron; (3) on the collar; and (4) on the left ring finger. Dosimeters were also placed around the operating table and room to evaluate the patient, other personnel, and ambient doses. Exposures were compared with standards of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). RESULTS: Total fluoroscopy time was 30.9 hours (1852 minutes; mean, 39.4 minutes per case). Yearly total effective body doses for all surgeons (under lead) were below the 20 mSv/y occupational exposure limit of the ICRP. Outside lead doses for two surgeons approximated recommended limits. Lead aprons attenuated 85% to 91% of the dose. Ring doses and calculated eye doses were within the ICRP exposure limits. Patient skin doses averaged 360 mSv per case (range, 120-860 mSv). The ambient (> 3 m from the source) operating room dose was 1.06 mSv/y. CONCLUSIONS: Although the total effective body doses under lead fell within established ICRP occupational exposure limits, they are not negligible. Because radiation exposure is cumulative and endovascular procedures are becoming more common, individuals performing these procedures must carefully monitor their exposure. Our results indicate that a team of surgeons can perform 386 hours of fluoroscopy per year or 587 EAIA repairs per year and remain within occupational exposure limits. Individuals who perform these procedures should actively monitor their effective doses and educate personnel in methods for reducing exposure.     

Does ASA classification impact success rates of endovascular aneurysm repairs?

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the technical success, clinical success, postoperative complication rate, need for a secondary procedure, and mortality rate with endovascular aneurysm repair (EAR), based on the physical status classification scheme advocated by the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA). At a single institution 167 patients underwent attempted EAR. Query of a prospectively maintained database supplemented with a retrospective review of medical records was used to gather statistics pertaining to patient demographics and outcome. In patients selected for EAR on the basis of acceptable anatomy, technical and clinical success rates were not significantly different among the different ASA classifications. Importantly, postoperative complication and 30-day mortality rates do not appear to significantly differ among the different ASA classifications in this patient population.     

Does hostile neck anatomy preclude successful endovascular aortic aneurysm repair?

OBJECTIVES: Poor outcomes have been reported with endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in patients with hostile neck anatomy. Unsupported endografts with active fixation may offer certain advantages in this situation. We compared EVAR results using the Ancure (Guidant) endograft in patients with and without hostile neck anatomy. METHODS: Records of EVAR patients from October 1999 to July 2002 at a tertiary care hospital were retrospectively reviewed from a division database. Patients with elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair during the same period were reviewed to determine those unsuitable for EVAR. Hostile neck anatomy, assessed by computer tomography (CT) scans and angiograms, was defined as one or more of the following: (1) neck length 3 mm, (3) >2-mm reverse taper within 1 cm below the renal arteries, (4) neck thrombus > or =50% of circumference, and (5) angulation > or =60 degrees within 3 cm below renals. RESULTS: Three hundred and twenty-two patients underwent EVAR with an average follow-up of 18 months. Patients in Phase II trials (n = 41), repaired with other graft types (n = 48), or without complete anatomic records (n = 27) were excluded. Demographics and co-morbidities were similar in the 115 good-neck (GN) and 91 bad-neck (BN) patients except for age (mean, 72.9 years GN vs 75.7 BN; P = 0.13), gender (11% female GN vs 22% BN; P =.04); neck length (mean, 21.8 mm GN vs 14.4 mm BN: P <.001), and angulation (mean, 22 degrees GN vs 40 degrees BN; (P <.001). Perioperative mortality (0 GN vs 1.1% BN), late mortality (5.2% GN vs 4.4% BN), all endoleaks (19.1% GN vs 17.6% BN), proximal endoleaks (0.8% GN vs 2.1% BN), and graft migration (0 for both groups) did not reach statistical significance. Neck anatomy precluded EVAR in 106 of 165 (64%) patients with open AAA. CONCLUSIONS: Unsupported endografts with active fixation can yield excellent results in treating many medically compromised patients with hostile neck anatomy. Nonetheless, an unsuitable neck remains the most frequent cause for open abdominal AAA.