Clinical factors associated with outcome in patients with metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma treated with vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy

BACKGROUND: Therapy targeted against the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway is a standard of care for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The identification of patients who are more likely to benefit from these agents is warranted. METHODS: In total, 120 patients with metastatic clear-cell RCC received bevacizumab, sorafenib, sunitinib, or axitinib on 1 of 9 prospective clinical trials at the Cleveland Clinic. Clinical features associated with outcome were identified by univariate analysis; then, a stepwise modeling approach based on Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify independent prognostic factors and to form a model for progression-free survival (PFS). A bootstrap algorithm was used to provide internal validation. RESULTS: The overall median PFS was 13.8 months, and the objective response according to the Response Criteria in Solid Tumors was 34%. Multivariate analysis identified time from diagnosis to current treatment <2 years; baseline platelet and neutrophil counts >300 K/microL and >4.5 K/microL, respectively; baseline corrected serum calcium <8.5 mg/dL or >10 mg/dL; and initial Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status >0 as independent, adverse prognostic factors (PF) for PFS. Three prognostic subgroups were formed based on the number of adverse prognostic factors present. The median PFS in patients with 0 or 1 adverse prognostic factor was 20.1 months compared with 13 months in patients with 2 adverse prognostic factors and 3.9 months in patients with >2 adverse prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Five independent prognostic factors for predicting PFS were identified and were used to categorize patients with metastatic RCC who received VEGF-targeted therapies into 3 risk groups. These prognostic factors can be incorporated into patient care and clinical trials that use such novel, VEGF-targeted agents.     

Prognostic factors for survival in previously treated patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To describe survival in previously treated patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who are candidates for clinical trials of new agents as second-line therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The relationship between pretreatment clinical features and survival was studied in 251 patients with advanced RCC treated during 29 consecutive clinical trials between 1975 and 2002. Clinical features were first examined in univariate analyses, and then a stepwise modeling approach based on Cox regression was used to form a multivariate model. RESULTS: Median survival for the 251 patients was 10.2 months and differed according to year of treatment, with patients treated after 1990 showing longer survival. In this group, the median overall survival time was 12.7 months. Because the purpose of this analysis was to establish prognostic factors for present-day clinical trial design, prognostic factor analysis was performed on these patients. Pretreatment features associated with a shorter survival in the multivariate analysis were low Karnofsky performance status, low hemoglobin level, and high corrected serum calcium. These were used as risk factors to categorize patients into three different groups. The median time to death in patients with zero risk factors was 22 months. The median survival in patients with one of these prognostic factors was 11.9 months. Patients with two or three risk factors had a median survival of 5.4 months. CONCLUSION: Treatment with novel agents during a clinical trial is indicated for patients with metastatic RCC after progression to cytokine treatment. Three prognostic factors for predicting survival were used to categorize patients into risk groups. These risk categories can be used in clinical trial design and interpretation.     

Nasal metastases from renal cell carcinoma are associated with Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center poor-prognosis classification

Unusual sites of metastases are recognized in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, the prognostic implications of these sites are not well understood. We used the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) risk classification for metastatic RCC to evaluate 912 consecutive patients with RCC managed at the Singapore General Hospital between 1990 and 2009. Among these patients, 301 had metastases either at diagnosis or during the course of illness. Nasal metastases, all arising from clear cell RCC, were identified histologically in 4 patients (1.3% of those with metastasis). All 4 patients were classified as MSKCC poor prognosis by current risk criteria. Nasal metastases were significantly associated with lung and bone metastases. The frequency of nasal metastases in patients with metastatic RCC is about 1%, occurring predominantly in patients with clear cell RCC. Nasal metastases are associated with poor prognosis as estimated by the MSKCC risk classification, with attendant implications for selection of targeted therapy, and are usually associated with multi-organ dissemination, including concurrent lung and bone involvement.     

Prognostic factors associated with long-term survival in previously untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To identify prognostic factors (PF) for long-term survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a metastatic RCC database at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation consisting of 358 previously untreated patients who were enrolled in institutional review board-approved clinical trials of immunotherapy and/or chemotherapy at our institution from 1987 to 2002. In order to identify patient characteristics associated with long-term survival, we compared 226 'short-term' survivors [defined as overall survival (OS) <2 years] with 31 'long-term' survivors (OS >or=5 years). RESULTS: Using logistic regression models, four adverse PF were identified as independent predictors of long-term survival: hemoglobin less than the lower limit of normal, greater than two metastatic sites, involved kidney (left), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS). Using the number of poor prognostic features present, three distinct risk groups could be identified. Patients with 0 or 1 adverse prognostic feature present had an observed likelihood of long-term survival of 32% (21/66) compared with 9% (8/91) for patients with two adverse features present and only 1% (1/93) for patients with more than two adverse features. CONCLUSIONS: Independent predictors of long-term survival in previously untreated metastatic RCC include baseline hemoglobin level, number of involved sites, involved kidney, and ECOG PS. Incorporation of these factors into a simple prognostic scoring system enables three distinct groups of patients to be identified.     

Tumor biology and prognostic factors in renal cell carcinoma

In the past 15 years, there has been an increased understanding of the tumor biology of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The identification of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), its related receptor (VEGFR), and the mammalian target of rapamycin as dysregulated signaling pathways in the development and progression of RCC has resulted in the rational development of pharmaceutical agents capable of specifically targeting key steps in these pathways. Clinical trials have demonstrated survival benefit with these agents, particularly in clear cell RCC patients. However, metastatic RCC will progress in all patients, resulting in a critical need to determine patient risk and optimize treatment. The goal of this article is to highlight the significant breakthroughs made in understanding the critical genetic alterations and signaling pathways underlying the pathogenesis of RCC. The discovery of prognostic factors and development of comprehensive nomograms to stratify patient risk and predictive biomarkers to facilitate individualized treatment selection and predict patient response to therapy also are reviewed.     

Validation and extension of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering prognostic factors model for survival in patients with previously untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To validate the Motzer et al prognostic factors model for survival in patients with previously untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and to identify additional independent prognostic factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were collected on 353 previously untreated metastatic RCC patients enrolled onto clinical trials between 1987 and 2002. RESULTS: Four of the five prognostic factors identified by Motzer were independent predictors of survival. In addition, prior radiotherapy and presence of hepatic, lung, and retroperitoneal nodal metastases were found to be independent prognostic factors. Using the number of metastatic sites as surrogate for individual sites (none or one v two or three sites), Motzer's definitions of risk groups were expanded to accommodate these two additional prognostic factors. Using this expanded criteria, favorable risk is defined as zero or one poor prognostic factor, intermediate risk is two poor prognostic factors, and poor risk is more than two poor prognostic factors. According to Motzer's definitions, 19% of patients were favorable risk, 70% were intermediate risk, and 11% were poor risk; median overall survival times for these groups were 28.6, 14.6, and 4.5 months, respectively (P < .0001). Using the expanded criteria, 37% of patients were favorable risk, 35% were intermediate risk, and 28% were poor risk; median overall survival times of these groups were 26.0, 14.4, and 7.3 months, respectively (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: These data validate the model described by Motzer et al. Additional independent prognostic factors identified were prior radiotherapy and sites of metastasis. Incorporation of these additional prognostic factors into the Motzer et al model can help better define favorable risk, intermediate risk, and poor risk patients.     

Current Algorithms and Prognostic Factors in the Treatment of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is highly resistant to chemotherapy but responds modestly to cytokine therapy. The prognosis for longterm survival is poor. Approximately 10% of patients who present with metastatic disease or relapse after nephrectomy are alive at 5 years. Identification of prognostic or predictive factors for individual patient outcomes is necessary in order to develop tailored treatments that reduce the risk of relapse and enhance the chance of successful management. The relationship between pretreatment clinical features and survival has been evaluated in studies leading to the creation of a Memorial Sloan- Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) risk model. Additionally, the cloning of the von Hippel—Lindau tumor suppressor gene, and the elucidation of its role in upregulating growth factors associated with angiogenesis, has provided insight into RCC biology and defined a series of targets for novel therapeutic agents. These targeted agents, including sunitinib, sorafenib, temsirolimus, everolimus, and bevacizumab plus interferon-α, have shown benefit in phase III trials in first- and second-line therapy. Analysis of the data from these trials and use of prognostic models have resulted in a new paradigm for the treatment of metastatic RCC. Herein, we review these targeted agents, the MSKCC risk model, and the new paradigm for treatment of metastatic RCC.     

Nephrectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Opinion statement Patients presenting with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) face a dismal prognosis, with a median survival time of only 6 to 12 months and a 2-year survival rate of 10% to 20%. RCC is notoriously chemorefractory, and immunotherapy is associated with total response rates of less than 20% and complete response rates of less than 5%. Therefore, surgery has continued to play a prominent role in the management of patients with metastatic RCC. Recent randomized prospective trials suggest a survival advantage for cytoreductive nephrectomy, and some patients with advanced RCC may also achieve palliation. Patients with limited and resectable metastases should be considered for combined nephrectomy and metastasectomy. The other main option for patients with advanced RCC is systemic immunotherapy followed by assessment for surgical consolidation, but responses in the primary tumor are uncommon and results with this pathway have not been encouraging. Tumor embolization can be a valuable palliative adjunct for some patients with metastatic RCC. Cytoreductive nephrectomy represents the most aggressive pathway for patients with metastatic RCC. Although cytoreductive nephrectomy can extend survival by approximately 50% for many patients, it can be associated with morbidity and delay in administration of systemic therapy. Therefore, patient selection, taking into account performance status and sites and burden of disease, which are well-established prognostic factors for patients with metastatic RCC, is of paramount importance in managing this challenging group of patients.     

Prognostic factors in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with VEGF-targeted agents

The medical treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has undergone a paradigm shift during the last decade with the approval of five drugs targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or its receptors (bevacizumab, sunitinib, sorafenib, pazopanib and axitinib) and of two drugs inhibiting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) pathway (temsirolimus and everolimus). Median survival has now reached 2 years in mRCC patients receiving first-line targeted treatment. A considerable body of work was conducted on the identification of prognostic factors of survival in the earlier era of immunotherapy of mRCC. The current challenge is to pursue this work on biomarkers of prognosis for targeted therapy and, even more importantly, to identify predictive factors of response to such therapy. This review provides an overview of recent key work on prognostic and predictive factors in patients with advanced clear cell RCC treated with VEGF-targeted agents.     

Predicting outcome to VEGF-targeted therapy in metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma: data from recent studies

Attempts to predict outcome in patients with metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have conventionally been based on pretherapy clinical factors such as performance status, disease-free interval, number of metastatic sites and several laboratory variables. These factors were developed before the era of VEGF-targeted therapy. Recent analysis from trials with anti-VEGF agents indicate that these factors continue to be of major importance in patient prognostication. Additionally, several serum and molecular markers, many of which relate to certain alterations of the von Hippel-Lindau pathway, are currently being investigated. Responses to VEGF-targeted agents appear to be related to a greater modulation of serum VEGF and soluble VEGF receptor levels. The impact of von Hippel-Lindau gene status on response to VEGF-targeted therapy was tested in a large study and was not found to predict a higher response rate to these agents. However, a subset of von Hippel-Lindau mutations that predict a 'loss of function' of the von Hippel-Lindau gene seem to have the best response to these agents. Future prognostic models will incorporate molecular markers with clinical variables to refine prognosis and prediction in metastatic clear-cell RCC patients treated with novel VEGF-targeted agents. These models, if externally and prospectively validated, will culminate in the rational selection of patients for specific VEGF-directed therapeutics.     

High-dose interleukin-2 for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma : a retrospective analysis of response and survival in patients treated in the surgery branch at the National Cancer Institute between 1986 and 2006

BACKGROUND: The treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with high-dose interleukin-2 (HD IL-2) has resulted in durable tumor regression in a minority of patients. The current study presents the authors' 20-year experience administering this immunotherapeutic agent. METHODS: Patients with metastatic RCC (n = 259) were treated with HD IL-2 alone from January 13, 1986 through December 31, 2006 at the Surgery Branch of the National Cancer Institute. Potential predictive factors for response and survival, both pretreatment and treatment-related, were first subjected to univariate analysis and then to multivariate logistic regression or a Cox proportional hazards model. Finally, the authors investigated Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) prognostic factors for survival to assess their predictive value in the patient population in the current study. RESULTS: A total of 23 patients experienced a complete response and 30 patients achieved a partial response, for an overall objective response rate of 20%. All partial responders had developed disease recurrence at the time of last follow-up, but only 4 complete responders had experienced disease recurrence by that time. Despite toxicities, only 2 patients developed treatment-related mortalities over this same time period. A higher baseline weight (P = .05) and MSKCC prognostic factors (P = .02) were found to be the variables most associated with response. For survival >4 years and overall survival, several pretreatment and treatment-related factors maintained significance, but none more so than response (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: HD IL-2 can induce complete tumor regression in a small number of patients, and many patients have experienced extended disease-free intervals. Given its relative safety, HD IL-2 should still be considered a first-line therapy in patients with metastatic RCC who have an overall good performance status.     

Carbonic anhydrase IX is an independent predictor of survival in advanced renal clear cell carcinoma: implications for prognosis and therapy.

PURPOSE: Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has a poor prognosis and an unpredictable course. To date, there are no molecular markers which can reliably predict RCC outcome. We investigated whether a novel kidney cancer marker, carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX), is associated with progression and survival. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Immunohistochemical analysis using a CAIX monoclonal antibody was performed on tissue microarrays constructed from paraffin-embedded specimens from patients (N = 321) treated by nephrectomy for clear cell RCC. CAIX staining was correlated with response to treatment, clinical factors, pathologic features, and survival. RESULTS: CAIX staining was present in 94% of clear cell RCCs. Survival tree analysis determined that a cutoff of 85% CAIX staining provided the most accurate prediction of survival. Low CAIX (相似文献   

Prognostic factors for survival in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with recombinant interleukin-2.

A database of 327 patients with advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) has been analyzed in order to identify potential baseline prognostic factors predicting for survival, following recombinant Interleukin-2 treatment (rIL-2). All patients received a continuous infusion (CIV). Eligibility criteria were uniform across studies, and included patients with an ambulatory performance status (PS), measurable disease, no CNS metastases, and no major organ compromise. Multivariate analyses identified baseline PS (ECOG 0 vs. 1), time from diagnosis to treatment (DTI greater than 24 months vs. less than or equal to 24 months), and the number of metastatic sites (1 vs. greater than or equal to 2, where lung, bone and other sites are considered as separate sites) as important predictors for survival. Patients can be classified into 4 subgroups, which are a function of the number of risk factors present. Median survival for each subgroup is 28, 17, 10 and 5 months, respectively. The model was validated in an independent cohort of 125 patients with RCC treated with subcutaneous (s/c) rIL-2, and predicted for survival accurately. By determining in which risk group category patients may fall, treating physicians may be better equipped to decide on patient management. The model may also be of value in order to stratify patients in randomized clinical trials.     

Prognostic factors for progression-free and overall survival with sunitinib targeted therapy and with cytokine as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

BackgroundAnalysis of prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was performed using final data from a randomized phase III trial of sunitinib versus interferon-α (IFN-α) as first-line metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) therapy.DesignA multivariate Cox regression model analyzed baseline variables for prognostic significance. Each variable was investigated univariately and then multivariately using a stepwise algorithm.ResultsEach treatment arm comprised 375 patients. For sunitinib, multivariate analysis of PFS identified five independent predictors, including serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level, presence of ≥2 metastatic sites, no prior nephrectomy, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, and baseline platelet count, while multivariate analysis of OS identified serum LDH level, corrected serum calcium level, time from diagnosis to treatment, hemoglobin level, ECOG performance status, and presence of bone metastasis as predictors. For IFN-α, LDH level and presence of ≥2 metastatic sites were common predictors of PFS to those for sunitinib, as were all predictors of OS except ECOG status.ConclusionsThis analysis identified prognostic factors for PFS and OS with sunitinib as first-line metastatic RCC therapy and confirmed that the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center model is applicable in the era of targeted therapy.     

A new prognostic classification for overall survival in Asian patients with previously untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma

The aims of the present study were to: (i) develop a clinically useful prognostic classification in Asian patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) by combining metastatic features with several pretreatment parameters; and (ii) evaluate the validity of this prognostic classification. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were collected for 361 patients who underwent interferon‐α‐based therapy between 1995 and 2005. Relationships between overall survival (OS) and potential prognostic factors were assessed using Cox's proportional hazard model. The predictive performance of the model was evaluated using bootstrap resampling procedures and by using an independent dataset obtained from randomly selected institutions. The predictive accuracy was measured using the concordance index (c‐index). Four factors were identified as independent prognostic factors: time from initial diagnosis to treatment, anemia, elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and poor prognostic metastatic group (liver only, bone only, or multiple organ metastases). Each patient was assigned to one of three risk groups: favorable risk (none or one factor; n = 120), in which median OS was 51 months; intermediate risk (two factors; n = 101), in which median OS was 21 months; and poor risk (three or four factors; n = 102), in which median OS was 10 months. The c‐index was 0.72 in the original dataset and 0.72 in 500 random bootstrap samples. In the independent dataset for external validation, the c‐index was 0.73. Thus, the new prognostic classification is easily applicable for Asian patients with previously untreated metastatic RCC and should be incorporated into patient care, as well as clinical trials performed in Asia.     

Clinical outcome and prognostic survival factors in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with very low-dose interleukin-2, interferon-α, and tegafur-uracil: a single-institution experience

BACKGROUND: The objective of the current study was to determine the efficacy and safety of very low-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2), interferon (IFN)-alpha, and tegafur-uracil for patients with unresectable renal cell carcinoma (RCC), metastatic RCC, or both. Clinical prognostic factors were also investigated. METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients underwent a 3-week treatment cycle of IL-2 (0.7 x 10(6) Japanese reference units [JRU])/person on days 1-3 weekly), IFN-alpha (3 x 10(6) international units/person, on days 1-5 weekly), and tegafururacil (300 mg/person daily). RESULTS: The median follow-up after treatment initiation was 11.3 months. A median of three (range, 1-20) treatment cycles was administered. Of 47 eligible patients, 4 had a treatment response (3 complete responses and 1 partial response; objective response rate, 8.5%). The median progression-free and overall survivals were 8.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.5-10.9 months) and 38.8 months (95% CI, 27.8-49.7 months), respectively. Only 8 patients had grade III/IV toxicities. Two parameters, i.e., the absence of a previous nephrectomy and a low hemoglobin level, were identified as independent factors predictive of poor survival. Patients with low or intermediate risk (presence of none or one of the two prognostic factors) had a durable median survival exceeding 30 months. High-risk patients with both risk factors had rapid disease progression despite treatment. CONCLUSION: While the effectiveness of this immunochemotherapy resulted in a limited antitumor response, low-and intermediate-risk patients with metastatic RCC seemed likely to have a survival benefit. Patient selection is essential to enhance treatment efficiency and avoid useless treatment for high-risk patients.     

Outcomes of palliative surgery for bone metastasis of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the era of targeted therapy

IntroductionThe introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors has revolutionized treatment strategies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and has improved survival rates. The number of patients with bone metastases from RCC requiring surgery will increase as survival rates improve. However, there is insufficient evidence to standardize the treatment of bone metastases after the introduction of targeted therapy for metastatic RCC. We aimed to determine the outcomes of palliative surgical treatment of bone metastases in the extremities of patients with metastatic RCC.Materials and methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 26 lesions from 17 patients who underwent surgery for extremity and acetabular bone metastases and were treated with targeted therapies for advanced RCC between 2008 and 2020. The median follow-up duration was 19 months (range, 4–76). We assessed the patients’ activities of daily living, quality of life, and pain and analyzed their postoperative values relative to preoperative values. Postoperative overall survival (OS), local progression-free survival (LPFS), and the factors affecting them were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test.ResultsThe 5-year OS and LPFS rates were 39.5% and 65.6%, respectively. The factors affecting OS were sex, Katagiri score, visceral metastases, and preoperative targeted therapy, while the factors affecting LPFS were pathologic fractures and surgical technique.ConclusionIn this study, the postoperative outcomes of palliative surgery for bone metastases from metastatic RCC were good. We suggest that systemic treatment should be prioritized over local control for advanced bone metastasis in RCC and surgery before pathological fracture should be performed for local control.     

Phase II study of interferon alpha in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma: a progress report

Partially purified interferon alpha (IFN alpha) was administered to 50 patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma (RCC) studied for more than two years. Complete or partial remissions were observed in 26% of the patients. Duration of remissions range from two to 16 months (median, six months). No distinct prognostic factors were clearly identified in the responsive patients, but responses occurred more frequently in men with optimal performance status who had undergone nephrectomy and in whom the metastatic disease was confined to the lungs, pleura, or mediastinum. Leukopenia and granulocytopenia were useful markers of biological activity but did not predict tumor response. Side effects and toxicity at the dosage used (3 X 10(6) units intramuscularly daily) were well-tolerated and consisted predominantly of fatigue and asthenia. We concluded that IFN alpha is useful for palliating metastatic RCC, but no impact on survival was demonstrated. Further studies are required to determine the optimal dose, routes of administration, and treatment schedules.     

Clinicopathological and prognostic factors for long-term survival in Chinese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sorafenib: a single-center retrospective study

Data on long-term survival and prognostic significance of demographic factors and adverse events (AEs) associated with sorafenib, an orally administered multikinase inhibitor in Chinese population with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are limited. Outcome data from adult patients (n = 256) with advanced RCC who received sorafenib (400 mg twice daily) either as first-line or second-line therapy between April 2006 and May 2013 were analyzed retrospectively. The primary endpoint was median overall survival (OS), determined to be 22.2 (95% CI: 17.1–27.4) months, and the secondary endpoint was overall median progression-free survival (PFS), determined to be 13.6 (95% CI: 10.7–16.4) months at a median follow-up time of 61.8 (95% CI: 16.2–97.4) months. Analysis of the incidence of AEs revealed the most common side effect as hand-foot skin reactions (60.5%) followed by diarrhea (38.7%), fatigue (35.5%), alopecia (34.0%), rash (24.6%), hypertension (21.5%) and gingival hemorrhage (21.1%). Multivariate regression analysis revealed older age (≥ 58 years), lower Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center score, time from nephrectomy to sorafenib treatment, number of metastatic tumors and best response as significant and independent demographic predictors for improved PFS and/or OS (p ≤ 0.05). Alopecia was identified as a significant and independent predictor of increased OS, whereas vomiting and weight loss were identified as significant predictors of decreased OS (p ≤ 0.05). Sorafenib significantly improved OS and PFS in Chinese patients with advanced RCC. Considering the identified significant prognostic demographic factors along with the advocated prognostic manageable AEs while identifying treatment strategy may help clinicians select the best treatment modality and better predict survival in these patients.