Purpose
We examined the cost of 2 common forms of surgical treatment of genuine stress urinary incontinence due to intrinsic sphincter deficiency, that is sling cystourethropexy and periurethral collagen injection.Materials and Methods
Between May 1994 and July 1995, 14 women with intrinsic sphincter deficiency underwent sling cystourethropexies. A total of 14 matched patients with intrinsic sphincter deficiency underwent endoscopic collagen injection during the same period.Results
The total cost per treatment of fascia lata sling cystourethropexy ($10,382) was 2.1 times greater than that for collagen injection ($4,996, p < 0.001). At an average followup of 14.9 months for fascia lata cystourethropexy and 21.3 months for collagen injection, 71.4% of patients in the former and 26.7% in the latter groups were completely continent (p = 0.05). One or no pads were used daily by 85 and 40% of the patients, respectively.Conclusions
Fascia lata sling cystourethropexy may be a more cost-effective surgical treatment than periurethral endoscopic collagen injection for treating genuine stress urinary incontinence in women with intrinsic sphincter deficiency when the greater success rate of the former procedure is considered. 相似文献Purpose
We assessed results of a combined modified rectus fascial sling procedure and augmentation ileocystoplasty in women with neurogenic urinary incontinence.Materials and Methods
We prospectively evaluated 21 patients (mean followup 28.6 months).Results
A total of 20 patients (95.2%) was dry during the day on intermittent catheterization and none had difficulty with catheterization. Subsequently surgery was necessary in 1 case for perforation of the augmented bladder.Conclusions
A combined modified rectus fascial sling procedure and augmentation ileocystoplasty are safe and effective when all available pharmacological treatments and clean intermittent catheterization have failed. 相似文献Background
Midurethral sling procedures have become the prime surgical treatment for women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Single-incision mini-slings (SIMS) potentially offer similar efficacy with reduced morbidity. This international multicenter trial compared the efficacy and morbidity of a SIMS (MiniArc) and a transobturator standard midurethral sling (SMUS) (Monarc).Objective
To compare subjective and objective cure, morbidity, and surgery-related discomfort following SIMS and transobturator SMUS.Design, setting, and participants
Prospective randomized controlled trial with an initial follow-up period of 12 mo. Women with symptomatic SUI were eligible.Outcome measurements and statistical analysis
Primary outcome was subjective cure, defined as an improvement on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I). Coprimary outcome was the mean visual analog scale (VAS) pain score (0–100) during 3 d after surgery. Secondary outcomes were objective cure based on the cough stress test (CST), disease-specific quality of life determined by the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) score, surgical parameters, and physical performance during recovery. Analysis was by intent to treat. Differences between the MiniArc and Monarc groups on dichotomous variables were chi-square tested and presented as relative risks (RR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. We hypothesized that MiniArc was noninferior to Monarc concerning subjective cure and superior concerning postoperative pain.Results and limitations
We randomized 97 women to MiniArc and 96 to Monarc. At 12-mo follow-up, subjective cure was 83% following MiniArc and 86% following Monarc (p = 0.46). Objective cure was 89% following MiniArc and 91% following Monarc (p = 0.65). The mean pain VAS score during the first three postoperative days was 9 following MiniArc and 22 following Monarc (Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.01).Conclusions
At 1-yr follow-up, MiniArc was noninferior to Monarc with respect to subjective and objective cure and superior with respect to postoperative pain.Patient summary
This 1-yr randomized clinical trial showed that MiniArc, a single-incision midurethral sling, is noninferior to Monarc, a transobturator sling, with respect to cure and superior with respect to pain and recovery. 相似文献An esophagectomy followed by reconstruction for esophageal cancer is a highly aggressive operation. The purpose of this study was to justify a two-stage operation for high-risk patients with esophageal cancer.
MethodsThe clinical results of 27 patients who underwent two-stage operation were compared with 118 patients who underwent a simultaneous resection and reconstruction (control subjects). The reasons for the selection of the two-stage operation were underlying general disease in 13 patients (liver dysfunction, n = 6; pulmonary disease, n = 3; poor performance status, n = 2; diabetes and renal failure, n = 1 each) and high-risk operation in 14 other patients (colon interposition, n = 7; salvage operation after definitive chemoradiotherapy, n = 4; and intraoperative events, n = 3). The patients initially underwent an esophagectomy and a cervical esophagostomy. Reconstruction was usually performed 2–3 weeks later.
ResultsThe patients in the two-stage group were older than the control patients (mean 67.8 vs. 61.6 years old). The morbidity rate of the two-stage operation was 29.6%, which was not statistically different than control patients (32.2%). Postoperative complications in the two-stage operation were anastomotic leakage in 5 patients, and pneumonia and wound infection in 1 patient each. No patient experienced in-hospital death. The survival rates were not statistically different between the two groups.
ConclusionA two-stage operation is a safe operation that prevents the occurrence of critical postoperative complications, and it thus may be considered an important treatment strategy for high-risk patients with esophageal cancer.
相似文献