Incidence of tuberculosis infection in psoriatic patients on anti‐TNF therapy: report of a case series with 144 patients

Background Worldwide clinical trials and post‐marketing surveillance data have demonstrated an increased incidence of tuberculosis (TB) disease associated with antitumour necrosis factor (anti‐TNF) agents. The majority of these cases are presumed to result from a reactivation of latent disease, while the rate of new infections is unknown. A study was performed to evaluate the incidence of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in psoriatic patients screened for biological therapy in a high‐incidence area, such as Madrid, Spain. Patients and methods One hundred and forty‐four patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis treated with anti‐TNF agents were recruited. All of them were screened for active TB or LTBI before therapy. The screening included a detailed medical study, physical examination, chest X‐ray, tuberculin skin test (TST) with purified protein derivative and re‐TST. Results A total of 42 (29%) patients were diagnosed with LTBI based on a positive TST or re‐TST, and/or signs of past TB in the chest X‐ray. All of them received chemoprophylaxis with isoniazide. One patient developed a primary active lymphnode TB. Conclusion This is the first study to underscore the incidence of LTBI in patients with psoriasis treated with anti‐TNF therapy in the Spanish population. We support that the use of TST is still reliable and an effective diagnostic method for the detection of LTBI in anti‐TNF therapy.     

Responses to ustekinumab in the anti‐TNF agent‐naïve vs. anti‐TNF agent‐exposed patients with psoriasis vulgaris

Background Approximately 20–30% of patients with psoriasis treated with anti‐tumour necrosis factor α (TNFα) agents will discontinue treatment within 2 years due to loss of efficacy or side‐effects. Switching to another anti‐TNFα agent produces clinical responses inferior to previously untreated patients. Ustekinumab binds to the p40 subunit of interleukin (IL)‐12 and IL‐23 and provides a mechanism of action independent of TNFα. Objective To investigate the efficacy of ustekinumab in a clinical practice setting and to compare treatment responses to ustekinumab in patients previously treated with TNFα inhibitors and anti‐TNFα‐naïve patients. Methods Patients receiving either ustekinumab (n = 71) or the subcutaneous TNFα inhibitors adalimumab or etanercept (n = 108) were identified through the registry of psoriasis patients in our Institutions. Efficacy effect outcome was a 75% improvement in the psoriasis area severity index (PASI75). Kaplan–Meier statistics evaluated the adherence to the treatments expressed as drug survival rate. Results PASI75 was achieved in 80% of the ustekinumab‐treated patients after a median time of 112 days. There was no difference in efficacy in anti‐TNFα‐naïve patients compared with anti‐TNFα unresponsive patients. Patients treated with ustekinumab showed a superior adherence to treatment in comparison with adalimumab and etanercept. Limitations Patients were non‐randomly assigned to treatment, which potentially may lead to biases. Observation time was short (1 year). Conclusion In clinical practice, the short‐term efficacy and patient adherence to ustekinumab are excellent and comparable to the data obtained in clinical trials. Lack of response to previous anti‐TNF treatment does not impair clinical response to ustekinumab.     

Elevation of serum KL‐6 in patients with psoriasis treated with anti‐tumour necrosis factor‐α therapy

We report three patients with psoriasis whose serum level of Krebs Von Den Lungen (KL)‐6 increased during therapy with anti‐tumour necrosis factor (TNF)‐α. A diagnosis of early‐phase or subclinical interstitial pneumonia was made in two patients, and their KL‐6 level decreased after anti‐TNF‐α discontinuation. The rise in KL‐6 in the other patient was attributed to methotrexate. We propose that serum KL‐6 should be monitored routinely in patients treated with anti‐TNF agents.     

Efficacy comparison of ustekinumab between anti‐tumor necrosis factor‐α drug‐naïve and anti‐tumor necrosis factor‐α drug‐resistant Japanese psoriasis cases

Ustekinumab is highly efficacious for psoriasis; however, it has not been fully clarified whether previous failure in anti‐tumor necrosis factor‐α (TNF‐α) therapy affects the treatment response with ustekinumab. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy of ustekinumab in anti‐TNF‐α‐naïve and anti‐TNF‐α‐resistant cases and compared the clinical efficacies of adalimumab and ustekinumab in biologic naïve cases. Thirty‐five patients with plaque psoriasis who showed resistance to conventional therapies were enrolled; 26 patients, who had never been treated with biologics, were allocated to ustekinumab or adalimumab; nine patients who failed to achieve psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) 50 at week 16 with one or two TNF‐α antagonists were switched to ustekinumab. The end of the study was defined as 52 weeks after starting the first biologic for anti‐TNF‐α‐naïve patients and after switching to ustekinumab for anti‐TNF‐α‐resistant patients. The primary outcome measurement was the percentage of patients achieving PASI75 at week 16. In patients treated with ustekinumab, 87.5% of anti‐TNF‐α‐naïve and 77.8% of anti‐TNF‐α‐resistant cases achieved a PASI75 response at week 16, and no statistically significant difference was found between the treatment response rates (P = 0.60). When comparing the treatment efficacy of ustekinumab and adalimumab among anti‐TNF‐α‐naïve patients, there was also no statistically significant difference in PASI75 achievement rates (87.5 vs. 83.3%, P = 0.79). Our study suggests that ustekinumab can be considered as a first‐line biologic for psoriasis and a rescue therapy for anti‐TNF‐α‐resistant cases.     

Alopecia areata as another immune‐mediated disease developed in patients treated with tumour necrosis factor‐α blocker agents

Background Tumour necrosis factor antagonists (anti‐TNF‐α) have demonstrated the efficacy in different chronic immune inflammatory disorders. Within the spectrum of adverse events, autoimmune diseases have been observed, including cases of alopecia areata (AA). Objectives The objective of the study is to characterize AA developed during anti‐TNF‐α therapy. Methods We present five new cases and review all the cases reported in the literature (eleven). Results One third of the cases had a positive (personal or family) history of AA. Most of them presented with rapid extensive AA, usually involving the ophiasis area. Prognosis was usually poor, with slight response to treatments. In the cases where anti‐TNF‐α therapy was maintained, the course did not seem to change. Conclusions Although rare, AA developed during anti‐TNF‐α therapy might be more frequent than suggested by reports of isolated cases. Personal and family history of autoimmune disease might alert clinicians to their possible development or relapse once the anti‐TNF‐α therapy is started.     

Asymmetric dimethylarginine but not osteoprotegerin correlates with disease severity in patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis undergoing anti‐tumor necrosis factor‐α therapy

Patients with psoriasis, in particular those with severe disease, have an increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) events compared with the general population. The aim of the present study is to determine whether correlation between asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) and osteoprotegerin (OPG), two biomarkers associated with CV disease, and disease severity may exist in patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis. We also aimed to establish if baseline serum levels of these two biomarkers could correlate with the degree of change in the clinical parameters of disease severity following the use of anti‐tumor necrosis factor (TNF)‐α therapy in these patients. This was a prospective study on a series of consecutive non‐diabetic patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis who completed 6 months of therapy with anti‐TNF‐α‐adalimumab. Patients with kidney disease, hypertension or body mass index of 35 kg/m² or more were excluded. Metabolic and clinical evaluation was performed immediately prior to the onset of treatment and at month 6. Twenty‐nine patients were assessed. Unlike OPG, a significant positive correlation between ADMA and resistin serum levels was found at the onset of adalimumab and also after 6 months of biologic therapy. We also observed a positive correlation between the percent of body surface area affected (BSA) and ADMA levels obtained before the onset of adalimumab and a negative correlation between baseline ADMA levels and a 6‐month BSA change compared with baseline results. In patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis, ADMA levels correlate with clinical markers of disease severity.     

Therapeutischer Einsatz der Tumor‐Nekrose‐Faktor‐α‐Hemmer Infliximab und Etanercept bei entzündlichen Hauterkrankungen

Background: The treatment of inflammatory skin diseases is at present often empirical as causal therapeutic approaches are not available because of incomplete knowledge of the immune pathogenesis. The current therapeutic approaches can induce remission, but often produce undesirable side effects. On the basis of experience gained in cytokine modulation therapy of chronic inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis, the use of TNF‐alpha inhibitors could represent a further, more specific and effective therapeutic option for other selected inflammatory skin diseases. Patients and Methods: The current status of the therapeutic effect of anti‐TNF‐alpha blockers is discussed based on our own observations and a review of the current literature. Potential undesirable side effects and possible contraindications for this therapy are also considered. Results and Conclusions: Based on the recent findings, the use of TNF‐alpha blockers seems to be promising in the treatment of therapy‐resistant inflammatory dermatoses. At present, guidelines for indications and contraindications for anti‐TNF‐alpha treatment of inflammatory skin disorders do not exist. Such guidelines are necessary to improve the efficacy of anticytokine treatment and to reduce side effects.     

Cross‐sectional multicenter observational study of psoriatic arthritis in Japanese patients: Relationship between skin and joint symptoms and results of treatment with tumor necrosis factor‐α inhibitors

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is an inflammatory arthritis with as yet unclear pathophysiology. This retrospective, multicenter, cross‐sectional study was conducted in 19 facilities in western Japan and aimed to identify patients’ characteristics and factors that affect the results of treatment with biologic agents. Of 2116 patients with psoriasis, 285 (13.5%) had PsA. Skin manifestations preceded joint manifestations in 69.8%, the onset was simultaneous in 17.2%, whereas PsA preceded skin manifestations in 2.5%. Peripheral arthritis was most common, occurring in 73.7%, compared with axial disease in 21.8%, enthesitis in 23.5% and dactylitis in 35.4%. Patients with severe skin manifestations were significantly younger at onset (P = 0.02) and more frequently had axial disease (P < 0.01). Biologic agents were used in 206 patients (72.3%), anti‐tumor necrosis factor (TNF)‐α antibodies being prescribed first to 157 of them. Anti‐TNF‐α antibodies were continued by 105 participants and discontinued by 47, the remaining five patients being lost to follow up. Patients who discontinued anti‐TNF‐α antibodies were significantly older than those who continued (55 vs 51 years, P = 0.04) and significantly older at onset of joint manifestations (50 vs 44 years, P = 0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed that patients over 50 years significantly more frequently terminated anti‐TNF‐α antibodies (P < 0.01). In conclusion, patients with PsA and severe skin manifestations have earlier onset and axial disease, which seriously impacts on quality of life. Anti‐TNF‐α antibodies were generally effective enough to continue but less so in patients aged over 50 years. Further detailed research is needed.     

Effects of anti‐TNF‐α agents on circulating endothelial‐derived and platelet‐derived microparticles in psoriasis

Psoriasis involves TNF‐α secretion leading to release of microparticles into the bloodstream. We investigated the effect of TNF blockers on microparticles levels before and after treatment in patients (twenty treated by anti‐TNF‐α agents and 6 by methotrexate) with severe psoriasis. Plasmatic microparticles were labelled using fluorescent monoclonal antibodies and were analysed using cytometry. Three months later, 70% of patients treated with anti‐TNF‐α agents achieved a reduction in PASI score of at least 75%. The clinical improvement in patients treated with anti‐TNF‐α agents was associated with a significant reduction of the mean number of platelet microparticles (2837/μl vs 1849/μl, P = 0.02) and of endothelial microparticles (64/μl vs 22/μl, P = 0.001). Microparticles are significantly decreased in psoriatic patients successfully treated by anti‐TNF‐α. Microparticles levels as circulating endothelial cells represent signs of endothelial dysfunction and are elevated in psoriasis. Then, TNF blockade may be effective to reduce cardiovascular risk through the reduction of circulating microparticles.     

Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in patients with psoriasis previously treated with anti‐tumour necrosis factor agents: subanalysis of BELIEVE

Background Few large clinical studies have evaluated whether switching tumour necrosis factor antagonists (anti‐TNFs) is likely to improve psoriasis in patients with prior anti‐TNF treatment. Objective The aim of this subanalysis of the BELIEVE study was to assess the efficacy and safety of adalimumab for psoriasis in patients with and without previous anti‐TNF treatment. Methods The BELIEVE study enrolled patients with moderate to severe psoriasis and prior failure, intolerance or contraindication to ≥2 systemic therapies. In this 16‐week, double‐blind, randomized, controlled trial, patients received adalimumab (80 mg, week 0; 40 mg every other week, weeks 1–15) with either topical vehicle or topical calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate (C/B) applied once daily for 4 weeks, then as needed. The primary endpoint was ≥75% improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (PASI 75) at week 16. This post hoc subanalysis evaluated the safety and efficacy of adalimumab, with and without topical therapy, in BELIEVE patients who had prior exposure to anti‐TNFs. Results Of 730 patients enrolled, 282 (38.6%) had prior anti‐TNFs and 448 (61.4%) were anti‐TNF‐naïve. Combining topical vehicle and topical C/B study populations, 61.7% of patients with prior anti‐TNFs achieved PASI 75 at week 16, compared with 71.7% of anti‐TNF‐naïve patients (P = 0.095). Adalimumab resulted in clinically meaningful improvement regardless of which prior anti‐TNF agent had been used, the number of prior anti‐TNFs tried, or reasons for discontinuation of prior anti‐TNF therapy. Adverse event incidences were similar between patients with and without prior anti‐TNF therapy. Conclusion Adalimumab was effective and well‐tolerated in patients with psoriasis previously treated with anti‐TNF therapy.     

Impact of anti‐tumor necrosis factor‐α agents on serum levels of KL‐6 and surfactant protein‐D in patients with psoriasis

We longitudinally examined the influence of anti‐tumor necrosis factor (TNF)‐α treatment on serum levels of KL‐6 and surfactant protein‐D (SP‐D). The study group comprised 22 patients with psoriasis treated with infliximab or adalimumab and with no history of interstitial lung disease (ILD). KL‐6 and SP‐D levels were measured in serum samples. Twelve of the 22 patients (55%) showed at least a 20% increase in KL‐6 levels compared with baseline. Of these 12 patients, none exhibited any signs of ILD on chest computed tomography and nine who showed an increase in KL‐6 levels (75%) showed at least a 20% increase in SP‐D levels. Some patients showed simultaneous increases in KL‐6 and SP‐D levels after treatment with anti‐TNF‐α agents. Although these patients may have undetectable or subtle alveolar damage, careful observation is needed.     

Treatment of refractory adult‐onset pityriasis rubra pilaris with TNF‐alpha antagonists: a case series

Background Pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP) is a rare inflammatory dermatosis with frequent clinical presentation as erythroderma. Conventional systemic treatment is often unsatisfactory and limited by long‐term toxicity. The use of tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists has been reported previously in single cases, but lacking long‐term follow‐up or comparison between different biological agents. Objectives To assess the long‐term efficacy and safety of TNF‐alpha antagonist, infliximab and etanercept, either in monotherapy or in combination therapy of severe, refractory adult‐onset PRP. Methods Seven patients of adult‐onset PRP, six newly diagnosed type‐I and 1 type‐II, which were resistant or ineligible to conventional systemic treatment, received a single course of infliximab or etanercept therapy, alone or in combination with low‐dose acitretin (>0.25 mg/kg/daily). After complete remission and treatment discontinuation, a follow‐up period of 12 months was evaluated for relapses. Results Six patients obtained complete remission after a single course of anti‐TNF‐alpha therapy: mean therapy duration was 19.3 weeks (range 6–48 weeks). All patients obtained significant clearing (>75% of body surface area) of skin lesions at week 12. Two patients with marked keratoderma developed localized disease recurrence during treatment. During follow‐up, only a single patient, affected by type II PRP, had disease relapse. Conclusions Both TNF‐alpha antagonists proved successful for the treatment of refractory, adult‐onset PRP, yielding complete and persistent clinical responses in type‐I PRP. Infliximab was associated with a more rapid onset of action, while treatment duration was comparable with etanercept. PRP type II warranted long‐term therapy and showed relapse after drug discontinuation.     

Development of MGUS in psoriatic patients: a possible undiagnosed event during anti‐TNF‐α‐treatment

Background Monoclonal gammopathies are haematological conditions characterized by the clonal proliferation of plasma cells which produce a monoclonal immunoglobulin that accumulates in the blood. They have already been reported during treatment with a range of drugs but never before during treatment with the anti‐TNF‐α treatments: adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab currently used in the therapy of moderate‐severe psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Objective This is a case series describing the development of MGUS in psoriatic patients treated with anti‐TNF‐α. Methods Three hundred patients receiving an anti‐TNF‐α treatment for chronic plaque psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis in a clinical setting in Italy, These patients were screened through serum protein electrophoresis to investigate the possible development of MGUS. Results Eight patients were found to have developed monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. The median treatment duration for the eight patients was 1 year with excessive IgG present in five patients, IgM accumulation in one patient and a double monoclonal component in two patients. Conclusion Our data suggest that there may be an association between anti‐TNF‐α therapy and development of MGUS.     

Antinuclear antibodies associate with loss of response to antitumour necrosis factor‐α therapy in psoriasis: a retrospective,observational study

Background An increasing number of patients with severe psoriasis are failing to respond to antitumour necrosis factor (TNF)‐α therapy (etanercept, infliximab and adalimumab). Objectives We observed that many of these patients developed antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and antidouble‐stranded DNA (anti‐dsDNA) antibodies while on treatment prompting us to investigate whether their development is associated with anti‐TNF treatment failure. Methods All patients with psoriasis who had received anti‐TNF therapies were identified and their blood results and treatment histories were obtained from electronic patient records and case notes. Results A total of 97 patients had been treated with anti‐TNF agents (60 were on their first agent, 22 had been on and stopped one agent, nine had been on and stopped two agents and six had been on and stopped all three agents). ANA developed in 17% of patients on their first treatment, 54% of patients who had failed one treatment, 78% of patients who had failed two treatments and 83% of patients who had failed all three treatments. Anti‐dsDNA antibodies developed in 2%, 27%, 33% and 83% of patients from the same respective groups. Significantly, the antibodies developed before treatment had failed with all three agents and their development was not related to the total time that patients had been on anti‐TNF therapy. Conclusions This study suggests that the development of ANA and anti‐dsDNA antibodies on anti‐TNF treatment may act as a marker of forthcoming treatment failure. Large‐scale prospective studies are required to assess the importance of this observation.     

Clinical applicability of T‐cell interferon‐α release assay for tumour necrosis factor‐α inhibitor therapy in severe psoriasis

Many studies have found that screening and treatment of latent tuberculosis (TB) before starting treatment with tumour necrosis factor (TNF)‐α inhibitors reduces associated TB infections. The new T‐cell interferon‐α release assay (TIGRA), is more specific and sensitive for detection of latent TB compared with the tuberculin skin test (TST). We report results of TIGRA in our first 63 patients commencing TNF‐α inhibitors for severe psoriasis. Of the 63 patients, 5 (7.9%) had a positive TIGRA result and were started on treatment for latent TB. We found that the only risk factor for TB associated with a positive TIGRA was a history of travel to countries with high TB incidence. To our knowledge, this is the first study to identify the background risk (7.9%) of latent TB in an endemic UK population. This result emphasizes the importance of TIGRA testing to reduce the risk of TB in patients treated with TNF‐α inhibitor.     

Spectrum of autoantibodies other than anti‐desmoglein in pemphigus patients

Background Pemphigus is a life‐threatening autoimmune blistering disease mediated by autoantibodies against adhesion molecule of the skin. Its concurrence with systemic and organ‐specific autoimmune disease was described in case reports. Objectives To evaluate the presence of a broad spectrum of organ‐specific and non‐organ‐specific autoantibodies other than anti‐desmoglein antibodies in pemphigus patients. Patients and methods Serum samples were obtained from 105 pemphigus foliaceus (PF) patients, 51 pemphigus vulgaris (PV) patients and 50 controls. Both indirect immunofluorescence assay and ELISA were used to assess the presence of autoantibodies related to connective tissue diseases, autoimmune hepatitis, vasculitis, rheumatoid arthritis, coeliac disease, diabetes and thyroiditis. Results Significant difference was observed between the three groups for anti‐thyroglobulin antibodies in the pemphigus foliaceus group (18% vs. 4%, P = 0.03). A significantly higher occurrence of IgM anti‐cardiolipin (P = 0.03), IgG anti‐reticulin (P = 0.01) and IgG anti‐gliadin antibodies (P = 0.008) were observed in the PV group. Cases with more than four autoantibodies were frequently positives for both anti‐desmoglein 1 and anti‐desmoglein 3. Conclusion Autoantibodies other than anti‐desmoglein antibodies are not rare in pemphigus patients. Clinical and serological follow‐up of pemphigus patients with positive autoantibodies are needed to clarify their impact in disease evolution.     

Clinical applicability of Quantiferon-TB-Gold testing in psoriasis patients during long-term anti-TNF-alpha treatment: a prospective, observational study

Background Psoriasis patients who are treated with tumour necrosis factor (TNF)‐alpha antagonists are at increased risk of reactivation of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) and should be adequately screened and monitored during active treatment. Objectives To evaluate in a prospective study, the performance of Quantiferon‐TB‐Gold in tube (QFT) in vitro assay compared to the conventional tuberculin skin test (TST) in detecting LTBI among a cohort of non‐BCG‐vaccinated patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis during long‐term treatment (12 months) with TNF‐alpha antagonists. Methods A total of 50 patients underwent QFT and TST testing at baseline and after 6 and 12 months of continuous anti‐TNF‐alpha treatment. Diagnosis of LTBI was made on the basis of a positive QFT result and negative chest‐radiographic and microbiological assays. Patients with LTBI were subjected to standard isoniazid chemoprophylaxis and after 1 month, they resumed anti‐TNF‐alpha treatment with subsequent QFT and TST testing after 6 months. In all the cases, a follow‐up period of 12 months was observed. Results During the 12‐month‐study period, 14% of patients presented a QFT conversion. During active anti‐TNF‐alpha treatment, a QFT conversion was observed in 10% of patients (five cases). Agreement between QFT and TST was moderate (κ = 0.408) at screening, good (κ = 0.734) after 6 months and fair (κ = 0.328) after 12 months of treatment. A total of 18% of patients presented a positive, discordant TST during the study period. Conclusions A single‐test QFT‐based screening strategy for LTBI in psoriasis patients receiving long‐term anti‐TNF‐alpha treatment could reduce the incidence of false‐positive LTBI cases, preventing unnecessary TB chemoprophylaxis.     

Clinical course of guttate psoriasis: Long‐term follow‐up study

Guttate psoriasis, known to have a better prognosis than other types of psoriasis, shows rapid involution and longer remission, but its clinical course has barely been studied. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical course and to compare the clinical and laboratory features of guttate psoriasis. This is a retrospective study of 26 patients with guttate psoriasis. The patients were divided into two groups; the good one with complete remission and long remission for at least 1 year (group A) and the poor one with incomplete remission and progression into chronic plaque psoriasis (group B). Among 36 patients, 22 patients (61.1%) were group A and 14 patients (38.9%) were group B. In group A, most of the skin lesions disappeared within 8 months. In group B, two patients without proper treatment progressed to plaque psoriasis. The onset age was younger and more frequent upper respiratory infection and high anti‐streptolysin O (ASO) titer were found in group A, but family history of psoriasis was more common in group B. Patients had two distingushable clinical courses: rapid involuting course with long‐term remission and chronic course without remission. There was a tendency toward younger age of onset with elevated ASO titer in patients with rapid involuting course.