Adjuvant therapy for resected colon cancer 2017, including the IDEA analysis

Introduction: Oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy has been the standard of care for resected early colon cancer for over a decade. Recent results from the IDEA meta-analysis attempt to address the question of whether 3 or 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy is preferable in Stage III colon cancer.

Areas covered: A review of the literature and recent conference presentations was undertaken on the topic of adjuvant therapy for resected early colon cancers. This article reviews the current evidence for adjuvant treatment of Stage II and III colon cancer, as well as up-to-date data regarding optimal duration of therapy. This article reviews the evidence for lifestyle modifications in the management of early colorectal cancer and other future directions for research in early colon cancer.

Expert commentary: In recent years, there have been no advances in the development of novel agents for adjuvant therapy in colorectal cancer. Although the IDEA meta-analysis was negative for its primary non-inferiority endpoint, the detailed results provide valuable information that allows personalisation of treatment regimen and duration.     

Therapeutic strategies for organ-confined and non-organ-confined bladder cancer after radical cystectomy

Introduction: In patients with muscle invasive or Bacillus Calmette-Guérin refractory urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder (UCUB) radical cystectomy represents the standard of care. However, a proportion of patients experience disease progression, local recurrence and/or metastatic disease.

Areas covered: This review provides an overview of available therapeutic strategies after radical cystectomy and examines ongoing clinical trials including cytotoxic chemotherapy and immunotherapy.

Expert commentary: Cytotoxic chemotherapy offers limited benefit in UCUB patients. However, the recent introduction of immunotherapy provides new hope for durable responses or possibly complete cures.     

Adjuvant trastuzumab: a 10-year overview of its benefit

Introduction: Anti-HER2 targeted therapy is one of the key advances in the treatment of breast cancer that have occurred in the last 20 years. In the adjuvant setting, the use of trastuzumab has led to prolonged and sustained survival benefit with very little toxicity as also confirmed by the 10-year follow-up results from the pivotal trials. Despite the survival improvement, several key issues are not entirely resolved in this field. These issues have led to multiple research efforts in de-escalating or escalating the standard treatment with chemotherapy and 1 year of adjuvant trastuzumab.

Areas covered: In this paper, we present an in depth overview on the state of the art on these key issues of refining decision-making in adjuvant anti-HER2 therapy.

Expert commentary: Despite many important research efforts in the field, chemotherapy plus trastuzumab for a total duration of 1 year remains the standard of care. However, recent data showed that besides standard anthracycline- and taxane-based cytotoxic therapy, alternative chemotherapy regimens can now be proposed to patients with small tumors without nodal involvement and to women at high-risk of developing cardiotoxicity. Of note, besides HER2 itself, biomarkers predicting patients who may truly benefit from anti-HER2 agents are still lacking.     

Advances in the use of surgery and multimodality treatment for N2 non-small cell lung cancer

Introduction: Stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents a heterogeneous group of bronchogenic carcinomas with locoregional involvement. Different categories of N2 disease exist, ranging from unexpectedly encountered N2 involvement after detailed preoperative staging or ‘surprise’ N2, to potentially resectable disease treated within a combined modality setting, and finally, bulky N2 involvement treated by chemoradiation.

Areas covered: Large randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses on stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC have been published but their implications for treatment remain a matter of debate. No definite recommendations can be provided as diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms vary according to local, national or international guidelines.

Expert commentary: From the literature, it is clear that patients with stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC should be treated by combined modality therapy including chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery. The relative contribution of each modality has not been firmly established. For patients undergoing induction therapy, adequate restaging is important as only down-staged patients will clearly benefit from surgical resection. Each patient should be discussed within a multidisciplinary team to determine the best diagnostic and therapeutic approach according to the specific local expertise. In the near future, it might be expected that targeted therapies and immunotherapy will be incorporated as possible therapeutic options.     

Current challenges in optimizing systemic therapy for patients with pancreatic cancer: expert perspectives from the Australasian Gastrointestinal Trials Group (AGITG) with invited international faculty

Introduction: Despite recent progress, the outlook for most patients with pancreatic cancer remains poor. There is variation in how patients are managed globally due to differing interpretations of the evidence, partly because studies in this disease are challenging to undertake. This article collates the evidence upon which current best practice is based and offers an expert opinion from an international faculty on how latest developments should influence current treatment paradigms.

Areas covered: Optimal chemotherapy for first and subsequent lines of therapy; optimal management of locally advanced, non-metastatic cancer including the role of neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy, current evidence for adjuvant chemotherapy, major advances in pancreatic cancer genomics and challenges in supportive care particularly relevant to patients with pancreatic cancer. For each section, literature was reviewed by comprehensive search techniques, including clinical trial websites and abstracts from international cancer meetings.

Expert commentary: For each section, a commentary is provided. Overall the challenges identified were: difficulties in diagnosing pancreatic cancer early, challenges for performing randomised clinical trials in all stages of the disease, some progress in systemic therapy with new agents and in identifying molecular subtypes that may be clinically relevant and move towards personalized therapy, but still, pancreatic cancer remains a very poor prognosis cancer with significant palliative care needs.     

How to use neoadjuvant medical treatment to maximize surgery in melanoma

Introduction: The aim of this work is to discuss the role of neoadjuvant therapy in melanoma patients, namely the potential to improve control and surgical resectability of locoregional disease. Moreover, potential survival benefits for high-risk stage III and IV melanoma patients will be addressed.

Areas covered: In this review, the different available neoadjuvant treatments including chemotherapy, bio-chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy and local therapy will be presented and discussed. The PubMed published articles were identified and searched using the following terms located in the publication title: neoadjuvant therapy and melanoma. Studies investigating targeted therapy, immunotherapy and local melanoma treatments were included. Clinicaltrial.gov was also used as a source for recruiting or ongoing but not recruiting neoadjuvant clinical trials, for which no published results are available.

Expert commentary: Targeted therapy and immunotherapy in a neoadjuvant setting are still under investigation and not yet approved, however several neoadjuvant trials are ongoing. Shortly, results from these trials will answer the question whether neoadjuvant treatment translates into survival benefit and improves local disease control in stage III and IV melanoma patients. Immunotherapy and targeted therapy will play as relevant a role as in the metastatic setting, whereas chemotherapy will be used seldom.     

Preventing central nervous system metastases in non-small cell lung cancer

Introduction: There are no effective central nervous system (CNS) metastases prevention methods in lung cancer patients. Prophylactic cranial irradiation has a limited effectiveness and relatively high toxicity. Systemic chemotherapy is not relevant in reducing the risk of CNS in lung cancer patients. The understanding of molecular background of brain metastases in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients could contribute to the development of personalized treatments for such patients.

Areas covered: This article summarizes the latest clinical trials concerning the use of radiotherapy, chemotherapy, molecularly targeted therapies, and immunotherapy in lung cancer patients, with particular consideration of brain lung cancer metastasis prevention. The literature search was undertaken via PubMed and EMBASE searches and relevant articles are included in this review.

Expert commentary: The recent data supports that EGFR-TKIs and ALK inhibitors are clinically relevant for first-line treatment to prevent and treat CNS metastases in molecularly selected NSCLC patients. In the future, high hopes for the prevention of CNS metastases in NSCLC patients are associated with immunotherapy concerning immune check-points inhibitors.     

Factors influencing radiation treatment recommendations in early-stage Merkel cell carcinoma: a survey of US-based radiation oncologists

Background: It is unclear which subgroups of Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) patients benefit the most from radiation. We surveyed radiation oncologists (RO) that regularly see and treat MCC to understand how they approach the treatment of early-stage MCC.

Methods: A web-based survey was emailed to 63 ROs, who were identified through publications, guideline panel membership, and/or affiliation with institutions of high MCC volume. ROs provided treatment recommendations for two hypothetical case scenarios of early stage MCC.

Results: Among 28 respondents (45%), 26 regularly saw and treated MCC patients for a median 7 years (range, 0–30). While all ROs recommended adjuvant radiation for a stage II upper extremity MCC, only 48% recommended adjuvant radiation for stage I head and neck MCC.

Conclusion: Among US-based MCC RO ‘specialists,’ there is equipoise on the role of radiotherapy for stage I MCC. Ideally, prospective studies are needed to identify which patients may benefit from radiation.     

The safety and efficacy of nivolumab in advanced (metastatic) non-small cell lung cancer

Introduction: Advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a challenging oncological problem. Following standard initial therapy, disease progression will typically develop. Patients with relapsed or refractory disease are left with limited treatment options. The advent of nivolumab, a monoclonal antibody against Program Death-1 (PD-1), has substantially changed the outlook for such patients.

Area covered: Nivolumab is the first checkpoint immunotherapeutic agent to gain regulatory approval for NSCLC. By enabling host immune-mediated cytotoxic activity against tumor cells, nivolumab induces a partial or complete tumor response in 15–20% of patients, regardless of number of previous lines of anti-cancer therapy. Nivolumab-related adverse effects are generally milder and less frequent than those observed with conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy. Although immune-related adverse events such as fatal pneumonitis have been reported with nivolumab therapy, most adverse events are reversible with a prompt immunosuppression. Studies investigating nivolumab in combination with other agents are ongoing.

Expert commentary: Nivolumab represents a significant breakthrough in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. Its therapeutic role for NSCLC may soon expand to include consolidation or maintenance setting. Furthermore, several clinical trials investigating the combination of nivolumab with other immunologic or non-immunologic treatments are ongoing and these will likely result in additional roles of nivolumab in NSCLC.     

Optimum treatment for mediastinal lymph node positive (N2) resectable non-small cell lung cancer: what is the role for surgery?

Introduction: A third of patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) present with Stage III disease with mediastinal (N2) nodal involvement representing an extremely heterogeneous population with a generally poor prognosis.

Areas covered: This article describes the complexity of Stage III-N2 patients reviewing the outcomes of key clinical trials while highlighting the trial designs and subtleties that have created controversy in management. Both bimodality approaches combining chemotherapy with either surgery or radiation and trimodality approaches combining chemotherapy with both local therapies are reviewed. Finally, prognostic factors and future directions are explored for the management of this population.

Expert commentary: Upfront surgery is not recommended for patients with Stage III-N2 NSCLC. Neoadjuvant approaches with both chemotherapy and chemoradiation are acceptable in a multidisciplinary setting if appropriate surgery is performed by a dedicated thoracic surgeon. Non-operative candidates should receive definitive concurrent chemoradiation. Innovative approaches are necessary to improve outcomes in this population.     

Oral vinorelbine-based concomitant chemoradiotherapy in unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review

Introduction: Cisplatin-based chemotherapy administered concomitantly to thoracic radiotherapy is the treatment recommended by the European guidelines for fit patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Cisplatin may be combined with etoposide, vinorelbine or other vinca alkaloids, which act also as radiation sensitizers. Initially administered intravenously, vinorelbine is also available as oral formulation and is the only orally available microtubule-targeting agent. In addition, the oral formulation avoids the risk of extravasation and phlebitis.

Areas covered: A literature search has been performed for articles reporting phase II–III trials aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of oral vinorelbine-based chemoradiotherapy in unresectable locally advanced NSCLC.

Expert commentary: In a series of trials with various protocols published from 2008 to 2018, mostly phase II studies, oral vinorelbine demonstrated a significant activity in concomitant chemoradiotherapy for unresectable locally advanced NSCLC typically as part of combination schedules with cisplatin. Main toxicities were hematologic (neutropenia and anemia); non-hematological toxicities included esophagitis and gastro-duodenal adverse events. Large prospective phase III trials are needed to confirm the role of vinorelbine-based chemotherapy associated to thoracic radiotherapy in unresectable stage III NSCLC and more particularly trials with metronomic oral vinorelbine.     

Evaluating the addition of oxaliplatin to single agent fluoropyrimidine in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction: Multimodality treatment of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has significantly improved local disease control, however the unaltered overall survival (OS) implicates an inability to further control micrometastases, providing rationale for intensified systemic treatment.

A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of adding oxaliplatin to a fluoropyrimidine (intervention) compared with fluoropyrimidine alone (control) in the treatment of LARC.

Methods: We searched CENTRAL, Medline Ovid, PubMed and EMBASE databases. Randomised trials comparing the intervention and control delivered either pre- or post-operatively were included.

Results: Seven trials involving 4444 patients were identified; five studies evaluated the intervention vs control preoperatively; one study peri-operatively; and one, post-operatively. There was no significant difference in OS with oxaliplatin addition, HR 0.89, 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.06. There was however an improvement in disease free survival, 3-year local and distant recurrence rates (RR) favouring oxaliplatin. Preoperative oxaliplatin improved pathological complete response (pCR), but with a greater toxicity and reduced compliance with radiation.

Conclusion: There is no OS benefit with oxaliplatin, despite improved pCR, local and distant RR. Before drawing definitive conclusions, longer follow-up in included trials and availability of published data from other eligible studies, including the induction setting, are needed.     

Post-prostatectomy radiation therapy for locally recurrent prostate cancer

Introduction: Approximately 15–30% of men with localized prostate cancer will experience biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy. Postoperative radiation therapy is used in men with adverse pathological features to reduce the risk of BCR or with curative intent in men with known BCR. In this study, we review the evidence for the adjuvant and salvage radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy.

Areas covered: A literature review of the Medline and Embase databases was performed. The search strategy included the following terms: prostate cancer, adjuvant radiotherapy, salvage radiotherapy, radical prostatectomy, biochemical recurrence, and prostate cancer recurrence. Prospective randomized trials for the adjuvant radiotherapy and observational studies supporting salvage radiotherapy were included for discussion.

Expert commentary: As postoperative radiotherapy is associated with non-trivial risks of acute and long-term toxicity and given the absence of compelling data supporting adjuvant over early salvage radiotherapy, the authors advocate, with rare exceptions, close observation and timely (early) salvage radiotherapy for patients with BCR and long life expectancy. Adjuvant radiotherapy may be considered in patients at high-risk for recurrence. Observation is appropriate in patients with limited life expectancy and/or absence of adverse features.     

Therapeutic approaches for refractory germ cell cancer

Introduction: Most germ cell cancer patients with metastatic disease are cured by cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy. 30% of metastatic patients will develop relapse or progress despite adequate first-line treatment and will require salvage therapy, with about 10% of metastasized patients ultimately developing platinum-resistant and fatal disease.

Areas covered: Based on a comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and conference proceedings of ESMO, ASCO and EAU meetings, this review provides an overview on current and potential future treatment options for platinum-refractory germ cell cancer patients including cytostatics and molecularly targeted therapies.

Expert commentary: Treatment of platinum-refractory disease remains challenging and long-term survival is rarely achieved despite multimodal treatment approaches. Targeted treatment approaches do not yet play a role in the treatment of platinum-refractory disease due to lacking efficacy in small, unselected clinical trials. Inclusion of patients into clinical trials is strongly recommended.     

Current and future therapeutic approaches for osteosarcoma

Introduction: Current treatment of osteosarcoma includes surgical resection of all gross disease in conjunction with systemic chemotherapy to control micro-metastatic disease. This yields a 5-year event free survival (EFS) of approximately 70% for patients with localized osteosarcoma while patients with metastatic or recurrent disease fare poorly with overall survival rates of less than 20%.

Areas covered: This review outlines the current and future approach towards the treatment of osteosarcoma. A literature search was performed utilizing PubMed. Several recent clinical trials are reviewed in detail, as is innovative research evaluating novel agents and surgical techniques which hold promise.

Expert commentary: The outcome for patients with osteosarcoma has not changed in several decades. This plateau in survival rates highlights the need for a novel approach towards research. There remains a great deal of interest in utilizing the very high risk population of recurrent osteosarcoma patients to rapidly and sequentially evaluate novel agents to determine if any of these agents hold promise. Several phase II studies are ongoing or in development that offer hope based on intriguing preclinical data. Furthermore, initiatives in obtaining specimens to further explore the genetic and immunological profile behind osteosarcoma will be essential towards identifying novel pathways and targets to exploit.     

Adjuvant therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma

Introduction: Locally advanced, non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is conventionally managed with surgery. However, patients are at a high risk of RCC recurrence and have poor survival outcomes. An effective adjuvant systemic treatment is needed to improve on these outcomes. Targeted molecular and immune-based therapies have been investigated, or are under investigation, but their role in this setting remains unclear.

Areas covered: A comprehensive search of PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed for relevant literature. The following topics pertinent to adjuvant therapy in RCC were evaluated: strategies for patient selection, cytokine-based immunotherapy, vaccine therapy, VEGF and non-VEGF targeted molecular agents, and immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Expert commentary: Strong evidence for the incorporation of adjuvant therapy in high-risk RCC is lacking. Multiple targeted molecular therapies have been examined with only one approved for use. Genetic and molecular-based prognostic models are needed to determine who may benefit from adjuvant therapy. Developing adjuvant therapy strategies in the future depends on the results of important ongoing trials with immunotherapy and targeted agents.     

Applications of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer

Introduction: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) plays a pivotal role in the current treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from colorectal cancer (CRC). Since the first demonstration, benefits for patients and especially an increase in survival have been described. In recent years, feasibility, efficacy and safety of HIPEC have been improved and progress has been made in understanding its oncological mechanism.

Areas covered: In this article, leading publications have been reviewed including clinical trials to describe the clinical presentation of PC due to CRC and present recent evidence of the CRS/HIPEC procedure. The surgical approach including evaluation of the extent of PC is described and, in addition, the article reports about different HIPEC techniques as well as several protocols. Furthermore, the development and prognostic benefit of the combination of intraperitoneal and intravenous chemotherapy are outlined. Consideration has been given in particular to patient selection and the use of HIPEC if complete cytoreduction is not feasible.

Expert commentary: The CRS/HIPEC procedure represents a curative approach to treat patients with PC from CRC. However, surgical skills and the HIPEC technique still require specialized oncological centers.     

The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ovarian cancer

Introduction: Ovarian cancer is mostly diagnosed at advanced stage. Better survival is achieved through complete debulking surgery and chemotherapy. Historically, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has been introduced for unresectable disease to decrease tumor load and perform a unique complete surgery. Four randomized control trials have compared primary debulking surgery to NAC, but there is still controversy about the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and questions about its modalities.

Areas covered: We made a review of knowledge on benefits of NAC compared to primary debulking chemotherapy, in terms of survival and morbidity, methods of administration, new drugs in early and late phase trials, the selection of patients. Similar survival was observed after NAC and interval debulking surgery or primary debulking surgery. Morbidity of surgery was decreased after interval debulking compared primary debulking surgery. Conventional drugs are carboplatin and paclitaxel. Safety of bevacizumab was evaluated in phase 2 trials associated with conventional drugs. Immunotherapy trials are enrolling patients in phase 1 study.

Expert commentary: NAC followed by debulking surgery is the best treatment for patients with advanced ovarian cancer.     

Optimizing treatments for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Introduction: The majority of patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) will recur. The treatment of patients with recurrent/metastatic (R/M HNSCC) is rapidly evolving.

Areas covered: This article will comprehensively review the current systemic treatment of R/M HNSCC.

Expert commentary: For the time being, the EXTREME regimen (cetuximab in combination with platinum and 5-fluorouracil) still remains standard of care in previously untreated R/M HNSCC patients who are candidates for combination chemotherapy. Single agents with well documented activity in HNSCC include methotrexate, cisplatin, 5-FU, docetaxel, and paclitaxel. The anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody nivolumab can be considered the current standard of care in patients with R/M HNSCC progressing after platinum-based therapy based on the results of CheckMate 141 showing a survival benefit over standard of care drugs, such as single agent weekly cetuximab, methotrexate, or docetaxel.

Multiple randomized phase III trials comparing anti-PD(L)-antibodies either as single agent or in combination with chemotherapy or an anti-CTLA-4 with the EXTREME as fist line treatment are ongoing or planned. The outcome of these trials might change the current treatment paradigm in previously untreated R/M HNSCC. Immunotherapeutic agents under active investigation include Toll-like receptor 8 agonists and inhibitors of IDO1.