Lenvatinib for the treatment of kidney cancer

Introduction: Sequential administration of single targeted agents has evolved as the dominant paradigm in advanced RCC treatment. Lenvatinib plus everolimus is the first combination therapy in advanced RCC to show improvement in efficacy compared to monotherapy in advanced RCC while maintaining manageable toxicity profile.

Areas covered: This review gives a brief overview of the contemporary clinical data on lenvatinib including its mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety profile in combination with everolimus. The clinical applications of lenvatinib in combination with everolimus are addressed within the context of the current competitive therapeutic landscape of RCC.

Expert commentary: Lenvatinib is a new VEGF receptor-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved in combination with everolimus for second-line therapy in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma progressing on a first-line VEGF receptor-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor. The combination of lenvatinib with everolimus significantly improved progression-free survival compared with everolimus with a hazard ratio of 0.40 and increased objective response to 43%. Optimal sequence of therapy targeting the tumor and the immune system remains a challenge and further investigation is warranted.     

Renal cell cancer: overview of the current therapeutic landscape

Introduction: The last decade has witnessed dramatic improvements in the diagnosis, classification and treatment of renal cell cancer (RCC). Besides improvements in surgical techniques in early stages, introduction of novel targeted agents has resulted in improved outcomes in advanced RCC for which no effective treatment existed until recently.

Areas covered: This article reviews epidemiology, pathology and pathogenesis, diagnosis, clinical staging, prognostic factors and treatment modalities of early stage and advanced RCC.

Expert commentary: Although treatment options are expanding rapidly, practicing physicians face considerable challenges in the decision-making process. Therapeutic agents may have unique side effects and unexpected drug interactions. RCC represents one of the major success stories of clinical oncology in recent years and the progress appears to be far from having reached a plateau. We aim to present a comprehensive in-depth review of RCC in an attempt to provide evidence-based recommendations and future perspectives for practicing oncologists.     

The safety and efficacy of nivolumab for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma

Introduction: Despite a variety of therapies for advanced advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) including vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, outcomes for these patients are still not optimal. Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors such as nivolumab, a fully human immunoglobulin (Ig) G4 PD-1 inhibitor antibody, is a promising development in RCC and provides a new therapeutic option for patients with advanced disease.

Areas Covered: This article reviews safety and efficacy data from the phase I, II, and III clinical trials that have led to the approval of nivolumab for the treatment of patients with advanced RCC who have previously been treated with VEGF-directed therapy.

Expert Commentary: Given the overall survival advantage with nivolumab compared to previously approved therapy, nivolumab is a new standard of care in the second-line setting for patients with advanced RCC. Additional studies are underway to answer important questions including the identification of biomarkes and the use of nivolumab in treatment-naïve patients.     

Cabozantinib for the treatment of kidney cancer

Introduction: Cabozantinib is a small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor that initially showed activity in medullary thyroid cancer and was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma after progression on first line therapy.

Areas covered: In the METEOR trial, cabozantinib demonstrated significantly improved efficacy in all three endpoints; response rates, progression free survival and overall survival in a randomized trial with everolimus as an active comparator. Cabozantinib also showed activity in the front line setting in RCC within the CABOSUN trial. The study randomized untreated metastatic RCC patients to either cabozantinib or sunitinib and the former showed improved progression free survival which was the primary endpoint. The future holds promise for indications in other malignancies, given the preliminary efficacy and unique mechanism of action of cabozantinib.

In this review we address the mechanism of action, pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of cabozantinib, and also review the development pathway of this agent in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma. The potential benefit in specific patient populations, such as poor risk patients and bone metastases subgroups is also discussed.

Expert commentary: The clinical applications of cabozantinib will be addressed within the context of the current competitive therapeutic landscape of RCC.     

Adjuvant therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma

Introduction: Locally advanced, non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is conventionally managed with surgery. However, patients are at a high risk of RCC recurrence and have poor survival outcomes. An effective adjuvant systemic treatment is needed to improve on these outcomes. Targeted molecular and immune-based therapies have been investigated, or are under investigation, but their role in this setting remains unclear.

Areas covered: A comprehensive search of PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed for relevant literature. The following topics pertinent to adjuvant therapy in RCC were evaluated: strategies for patient selection, cytokine-based immunotherapy, vaccine therapy, VEGF and non-VEGF targeted molecular agents, and immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Expert commentary: Strong evidence for the incorporation of adjuvant therapy in high-risk RCC is lacking. Multiple targeted molecular therapies have been examined with only one approved for use. Genetic and molecular-based prognostic models are needed to determine who may benefit from adjuvant therapy. Developing adjuvant therapy strategies in the future depends on the results of important ongoing trials with immunotherapy and targeted agents.     

Pembrolizumab for the treatment of bladder cancer

Introduction: Until recently, patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma after progression on cisplatin-containing chemotherapy had limited systemic treatment options with no significant survival benefit and poor tolerability. Advances in the field of immunotherapy with the introduction of checkpoint inhibitors have led to paradigm shifts in the treatment of various malignancies.

Areas covered: The current review will summarize the clinical evidence of checkpoint inhibitors in bladder cancer, with a focus on pembrolizumab.

Expert commentary: Category 1 evidence indicates that the checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab improves overall survival in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who progressed after or during cisplatin-containing therapy as compared to current standard of care chemotherapy. Phase 1 and 2 evidence also indicates that checkpoint inhibitors are active in first line in patients who are ineligible for cisplatin-containing chemotherapy.     

Fulvestrant for the treatment of advanced breast cancer

Introduction: The current issues with endocrine therapy for treatment of advanced breast cancer include balance of efficacy of therapy versus tolerability as well as hormone resistance. The efficacy of fulvestrant, a selective oestrogen receptor degrader (SERD), has been demonstrated in hormone receptor positive patients previously untreated or treated with hormonal therapy.

Areas covered: This article discusses the journey of fulvestrant licensing, its efficacy in combination with other endocrine therapies and the future role it may have within breast cancer treatment.

Expert commentary: Within phase III trials, fulvestrant has demonstrated equivalent or improved clinical efficacy when compared with established endocrine agents. In the recent decade, fulvestrant has achieved licensing as a second line agent in non-operative advanced breast cancer at initially 250mg, increasing to 500mg. Presently, fulvestrant is licensed globally as first line endocrine management for advanced breast cancer in post-menopausal women. Early combination trials of fulvestrant and cyclin dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors have demonstrated good clinical efficacy with improved progression free survival when compared to fulvestrant alone.     

Immunotherapeutic strategies for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma: Where will we go?

Introduction: Historically, renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is considered a chemotherapy-resistant tumor. The cornerstone of systemic therapy included mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Currently, a new era is enteres with promising immunotherapeutic treatments, which are becoming commercially available.

Areas covered: We provide a comprehensive review using PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov about the following immunotherapies in RCC: i) vaccine therapy, ii) adoptive T Cell Transfer and CAR T cells, iii) nonspecific immunotherapy – IL-2 (new formulations), iv) Checkpoint inhibitors, v) other checkpoint-molecules. We will also discuss their mechanism of action and toxicity, the importance of developing new patient selection algorithms (immunoprofiling, guidelines updates) and new biomarkers such as PD-1 expression.

Expert commentary: Immunotherapy shows promise, and the current tools used in clinical practice, including guidelines, staging-classification and algorithms should be revised and adapted to the new immunotherapeutic drugs. Although immunotherapy in RCC show promising results, more research is needed in parallel to discover biomarkers that enable the prediction of a treatment response and therefore lead to better patient selection.     

Treatment of advanced breast cancer with a metronomic schedule of oral vinorelbine: what is the opinion of Italian oncologists?

Background: The aim of this study was to record the opinions of Italian oncologists about the use of oral vinorelbine administered metronomically in patients with advanced breast cancer.

Methods: A series of meetings were held throughout Italy, and participants were asked how much they agreed with each of the several statements.

Results: The majority of oncologists agreed that the concept of the minimum biologically effective dose should be used for drugs administered metronomically. Over 50% agreed that metronomic vinorelbine is an option in first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced breast cancer, including those with a terminal illness and the elderly, as well as in young and fit patients. Just over one-third of experts agreed that a combination of two chemotherapy agents instead of one is not desirable in metastatic breast cancer because of increased toxicity. Most experts agreed that the main aim of a first-line therapy is to control the disease over time and to preserve quality of life.

Conclusion: Metronomically administered oral vinorelbine, either as monotherapy or in combination with other drugs, is effective in the long-term treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer. The clinical profiles of patients should be carefully considered to determine the appropriate treatment strategy.     

The safety and efficacy of sonidegib for the treatment of locally advanced basal cell carcinoma

Introduction: Basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) are the commonest malignancy in the Western world. Locally advanced BCCs (laBCCs) represent tumours that have developed in difficult-to-treat facial sites, aggressively recurrent tumours, large neglected tumours and those in which current treatment options are excluded by clinical or patient-driven criteria. It is estimated laBCCs represent 1% of BCCs.

Areas covered: Sonidegib is an oral hedgehog pathway inhibitor with a novel structure. It has recently been licensed for the treatment of laBCC.

This article provides a comprehensive review of the literature regarding sonidegib, detailing the pharmacology of the compound, clinical trial data, competitor compounds and a future perspective.

Expert commentary: Sonidegib is a novel smoothened (SMO) inhibitor with comparable efficacy to vismodegib, with patient response rates of 44% (sonidegib) and 43% (vismodegib). The adverse effect profile of these two treatments is similar with the main effects being considered to be class effects of SMO inhibitors.     

Update on medical treatment of small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors

Introduction: Small intestinal (SI) neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are relatively rare tumors. Due to the lack of symptom or specific symptoms, SI-NETs are often diagnosed at an advanced stage, making therapy challenging. The management of patients with advanced stage SI-NETS requires a multidisciplinary approach that combines surgical and medical treatment including novel targeted molecular therapies.

Areas covered: This article summarizes current strategies for the medical treatment of SI-NETS.

Expert commentary: The treatment plan of advanced-stage SI-NETs should be tailored in a case-by-case manner with the adoption of a multidisciplinary approach that combines different treatment options, including biological targeted therapies. In particular, we believe that the identification of the optimal treatment sequence(s), correct treatment timing and the selection of patients eligible to different treatments need specific investigation in controlled clinical trials.     

Evaluating the addition of oxaliplatin to single agent fluoropyrimidine in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction: Multimodality treatment of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has significantly improved local disease control, however the unaltered overall survival (OS) implicates an inability to further control micrometastases, providing rationale for intensified systemic treatment.

A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of adding oxaliplatin to a fluoropyrimidine (intervention) compared with fluoropyrimidine alone (control) in the treatment of LARC.

Methods: We searched CENTRAL, Medline Ovid, PubMed and EMBASE databases. Randomised trials comparing the intervention and control delivered either pre- or post-operatively were included.

Results: Seven trials involving 4444 patients were identified; five studies evaluated the intervention vs control preoperatively; one study peri-operatively; and one, post-operatively. There was no significant difference in OS with oxaliplatin addition, HR 0.89, 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.06. There was however an improvement in disease free survival, 3-year local and distant recurrence rates (RR) favouring oxaliplatin. Preoperative oxaliplatin improved pathological complete response (pCR), but with a greater toxicity and reduced compliance with radiation.

Conclusion: There is no OS benefit with oxaliplatin, despite improved pCR, local and distant RR. Before drawing definitive conclusions, longer follow-up in included trials and availability of published data from other eligible studies, including the induction setting, are needed.     

Understanding dendritic cell immunotherapy in ovarian cancer

Introduction: Approximately eighty percent of patients with ovarian cancer are diagnosed with advanced disease. Even with cutting edge surgical techniques and the best regimens of standard therapies most patients relapse and die of drug resistant disease within five years of diagnosis. Dendritic cell (DC) immunotherapy can induce anti-tumor T cell immunity in patients and holds great potential in the era of modern anti-cancer treatment.

Areas Covered: This review outlines critical factors regulating the outcome of DC immunotherapy in ovarian cancer, summarizes the important findings in ovarian cancer DC clinical trials, and discusses new directions which may improve the effectiveness of DC immunotherapy.

Expert Commentary: Administration of DC vaccines with other forms of immunotherapy may enhance the efficacy of these treatments, ultimately increasing cures for this disease.     

Advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with activating EGFR mutations: first-line treatment with afatinib and other EGFR TKIs

Introduction: Based on the results of several randomised controlled trials, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have now replaced platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring an activating EGFR mutation.

Areas covered: This review describes the EGFR pathway and its abnormalities in NSCLC and discusses the differential molecular and clinical activity of first and next-generation EGFR TKIs in the first-line treatment of tumors with an activating EGFR mutation, with a special focus on the second-generation agent afatinib. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify all relevant clinical trials including abstracts from most recent meetings to provide up-to-date information on this topic.

Expert commentary: While the first-generation EGFR TKIs erlotinib and gefitinib exhibited good tolerability and improved progression-free survival compared with a platinum doublet, they failed to improve overall survival (OS). In contrast, clinical trials of afatinib (LUX-Lung 3 and 6) demonstrated a significant OS advantage over a platinum doublet, particularly in patients whose tumors harbored the Del19 mutation. Moreover, in a head-to-head comparison afatinib improved efficacy versus gefitinib in patients with common EGFR mutations across a range of clinically relevant endpoints. Afatinib is therefore a promising first-line option in these patients.     

Multimodality treatment of operable gastric and oesophageal adenocarcinoma: evaluating neoadjuvant,adjuvant and perioperative approaches

Introduction: Treatment patterns for locally advanced operable gastric and oesophageal adenocarcinoma vary, with the optimal approach an area of debate within oncology. Strategies for treatment include a variety of neo-adjuvant, adjuvant and peri-operative regimens involving differing chemotherapy and radiotherapy combinations.

Areas covered: This review will critically appraise the evidence base underpinning the main treatment approaches in operable oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma, highlighting variations in treatment by factors such as geographical area and primary tumor site.

Expert commentary: The expert commentary will focus on the optimal evidence-based approaches for clinicians at the present time and explore how increased understanding of the molecular and genetic determinants of the disease may lead to refinements in treatment through the development of both biomarker-driven approaches and the application of novel targeted and immune-modulating agents to early treatment.     

Recent advances in the management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Introduction: Pancreatic cancer (PC) demonstrates very poor prognosis and its incidence continues to increase, despite developments in chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and targeted therapies. Surgical resection is currently the only curative approach for PC. The role of radiotherapy in adjuvant and locally advanced PC continues to be increasingly controversial. This review article aims to explore the current knowledge of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, focusing on diagnosis, treatment strategies, and the best supportive care.

Areas covered: The current literature on pancreatic adenocarcinoma treatment modalities has been summarized, with a focus on clinical trials and reviews. New treatment strategies and their impact on clinical practice have also been discussed.

Expert commentary: Despite many therapeutic developments, only modest improvements in survival rates have been achieved. There is an essential need to increase survival by developing more innovative treatment approaches for patients with PC.     

Durvalumab in urothelial cancers

Introduction: Urothelial bladder cancer is one of the most predominant malignancies worldwide with a poor prognosis when presented at an advanced or metastatic stage. Improving the therapeutic landscape in this setting has been an unmet medical need. Palliative cisplatin-based chemotherapy is currently the standard of care in first line therapies, but many patients are ineligible and few alternative therapies exist. Moreover second-line chemotherapy has minimal activity. Recently, immune-checkpoint inhibitors have shifted the therapeutic armamentarium of bladder cancer and it is now necessary to redesign the therapeutic paradigm.

Areas covered: In this article, we focus on the development of durvalumab and provide an overview of the safety, activity, efficacy and future perspectives of this drug in urothelial carcinoma.

Expert commentary: Durvalumab is a well-tolerated drug and demonstrated major and durable response in advanced bladder cancer. Combinations with durvalumab will probably emerge as promising therapeutic strategies for the treatment of urothelial carcinoma. Further research efforts are needed to identify predictive biomarkers of response to immune-oncology agents.     

Opportunities and challenges of long term anti-estrogenic adjuvant therapy: treatment forever or intermittently?

Introduction: Extended adjuvant (5–10 years) therapy targeted to the estrogen receptor (ER) has

significantly decreased mortality from breast cancer (BC).

Areas covered: Translational research advanced clinical testing of extended adjuvant therapy with tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors (AIs). Short term therapy or non-compliance increase

recurrence, but surprisingly recurrence and death does not increase dramatically after 5 years of adjuvant therapy stops.

Expert commentary: Compliance ensures optimal benefit from extended antihormone adjuvant therapy.Retarding acquired resistance using CDK4/6 or mTOR inhibitors is discussed. Preventing acquired resistance from mutations of ER could be achieved with Selective ER Downregulators (SERDs), eg fulvestrant. Fulvestrant is a depot injectable so oral SERDs are sought for extended use. In reality, a ‘super SERD’ which destroys ER but improves women’s health like a Selective ER Modulator (SERM), would aid compliance to prevent recurrence and death. Estrogen-induced apoptosis occurs in 30% of BC with antihormone resistance. The ‘one in three’ rule that dictates that one in three unselected patients respond to either hormonal or antihormonal therapy in BC occurs with estrogen or antiestrogen therapy and must be improved. The goal is to maintain patients for their natural lives by blocking cancer cell survival through precision medicine using short cycles of estrogen apoptotic salvage therapy, and further extended antihormone maintenance.     

The role of external beam radiation therapy in well-differentiated thyroid cancer

Introduction: This review article explores the use of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in well differentiated thyroid cancer.

Areas covered: The published literature on EBRT for advanced pT4 disease and macroscopic unresectable disease to improve locoregional control is reviewed. EBRT techniques, volumes and doses are discussed in detail. The potential acute and late toxicities of EBRT are discussed in the context of the published literature. The use of EBRT for patients with metastatic disease is also described.

Expert commentary: There is good retrospective evidence for EBRT in the setting of unresectable gross residual well-differentiated thyroid cancer as this can result in long-term local control. However, the benefit of EBRT in patients with locally advanced disease that is completely resected is less clear. The use of EBRT for these patients requires careful consideration of age, pathologic factors, comorbidities and patient preference, preferably by a multi-disciplinary team.     

Current and future therapeutic approaches for the treatment of small cell lung cancer

Introduction: Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a very aggressive disease characterized by a high response rate to first-line chemotherapy, but most patients relapse within 1 year with disappointing results to second-line treatments. Chemotherapy has reached a plateau of effectiveness and new therapeutic strategies are needed to change the natural history of SCLC.

Areas covered: This review will focus on the current results and the future development of the therapeutic approaches for the treatment of SCLC.

Expert commentary: Immunotherapy is becoming a new frontier for the management of SCLC with preliminary interesting results. To date, no targeted drugs have been approved for clinical practice but several novel agents are in an advanced stage of clinical development in SCLC.