Role of auditory stimulation in maturation of the auditory pathway

Objective To compare the maturation of the auditory pathway, as shown by electrical brainstem auditory potentials (EABRs), in ears with and without prior auditory stimulation.

Material and Methods Electrophysiological data were collected prospectively from ears which had received cochlear implants. Implant-evoked (Imp)EABRs were recorded. Thirty children, implanted after January 2000, were selected according to a strict inclusion/exclusion protocol. All the children had received a 22-channel Nucleus cochlear implant (CI24 series). Intraoperatively, ImpEABRs were recorded using the Medelec Synergy® Evoked Response system in conjunction with Nucleus Neural Response Telemetry® software. The ImpEABR latencies of waves eII, eIII and eV and the morphology of wave eV were assessed.

Results ImpEABRs alter during the first 12 months of life. The latency becomes shorter during this period and the morphology of wave eV alters from a broad shape to a more distinct waveform. This appears to occur independently, even in the absence of auditory stimulation.

Conclusion The development of electrical brainstem auditory potentials is not dependent on auditory stimulation.     

Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response monitoring of auditory brainstem implant integrity during facial nerve tumor surgery.

Evoked potentials identified as electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABRs) have been recorded from a patient in response to electrical stimulation of the cochlear nucleus via an auditory brainstem implant. Recording such EABRs during surgery for removal of an ipsilateral facial nerve tumor provided a means to monitor the integrity of the implant. The presence of stable EABRs similar to those obtained before surgery indicated that the lead wires had not been severed and that the implanted electrodes had not been dislodged. EABR recording may also be useful for assisting with positioning the stimulating electrodes during initial implantation surgery, by verifying that stimulation can activate the auditory system.     

Activity-dependent developmental plasticity of the auditory brain stem in children who use cochlear implants

OBJECTIVES: 1) To determine if a period of early auditory deprivation influences neural activity patterns as revealed by human auditory brain stem potentials evoked by electrical stimulation from a cochlear implant. 2) To examine the potential for plasticity in the human auditory brain stem. Specifically, we asked if electrically evoked auditory potentials from the auditory nerve and brain stem in children show evidence of development as a result of implant use. 3) To assess whether a sensitive or critical period exists in auditory brain stem development. Specifically, is there an age of implantation after which there are no longer developmental changes in auditory brain stem activity as revealed by electrically evoked potentials? DESIGN: The electrically evoked compound potential of the auditory nerve (ECAP) and the electrically evoked auditory brain stem response (EABR) were recorded repeatedly during the first year of implant use in each of 50 children. The children all had pre- or peri-lingual onset of severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss and received their implants at ages ranging from 12 mo to 17 yr. All children received Nucleus cochlear implant devices. All children were in therapy and in school programs that emphasized listening and required the children to wear their implants consistently. RESULTS: Initial stimulation from the cochlear implant evoked clear responses from the auditory nerve and auditory brain stem in most children. There was no correlation between minimum latency, maximum amplitude, or slope of amplitude growth of initial responses with age at implantation for ECAP eN1, EABR eIII and eV components (p > 0.05). During the first year of implant use, minimum latency of these waves significantly decreased (p < 0.01, p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001, respectively). Neural conduction time, measured using the interwave latency of ECAP eN1-EABR eIII for lower brain stem and EABR eIII-eV for upper brain stem, decreased during the period of 6 to 12 mo of cochlear implant use (p < 0.01 (lower), p < 0.0001(upper)). The ECAP wave eN1 and the EABR wave eV showed significant increases in amplitude during time of implant use (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively). There were no correlations between the rate of interwave latency decrease and the rate of amplitude increases and the age at which children underwent implantation (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Activity in the auditory pathways to the level of the midbrain can be evoked by acute stimulation from a cochlear implant. EABR measures are not influenced by any period of auditory deprivation. Auditory development proceeds once the implant is activated and involves improvements in neural conduction velocity and neural synchrony. Underlying mechanisms likely include improvements in synaptic efficacy and possibly increased myelination. The developmental plasticity that we have shown in the human auditory brain stem does not appear from EABR data to be limited by a critical period during childhood.     

Incidence and characteristics of facial nerve stimulation in children with cochlear implants

OBJECTIVES: Electrical stimulation from a cochlear implant can spread beyond the auditory nerve. The aims of this study were to accurately measure facial nerve stimulation in pediatric implant users and to determine the characteristics and incidence of this unwanted activity. Part A consisted of a prospective study of a randomized sample of 44 pediatric implant users. Part B consisted of a retrospective analysis of 121 children with previously recorded electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABR). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Responses were evoked by 3 electrodes along the implant array in three groups of children: 1) postmeningitic, 2) abnormal cochlea, and 3) neither. Intraoperative measures were obtained under anesthesia; all other recordings were completed in awake children. RESULTS: Intraoperative recordings revealed large nonauditory responses in a number of channels, including the midline EABR. Under paralysis, these responses disappeared, and clear EABRs were recorded. Similarly, prospective postoperative electromyographic (EMG) responses from the facial nerve were found in more than 59% (26 of 44) of experienced implant users (Nucleus 24): 31% of postmeningitic children (4 of 13), 80% of those with abnormal cochlea (8 of 10), and 66% of those with neither (14 of 21). Retrospective analysis of previously recorded postoperative EABRs demonstrated facial nerve stimulation in 35% (42 of 121). In most cases, facial nerve stimulation occurred when levels were perceptually loud but comfortable. CONCLUSIONS: 1) Facial nerve potentials can be recorded using EMG in a large proportion of cochlear implant users at high levels of stimulation. 2) The EABR can be obscured in the presence of facial nerve stimulation and care should be taken to distinguish it from the EMG response, particularly when auditory brainstem activity is in question. 3) Use of surface EMG provides an additional objective measure to ensure the safe and comfortable use of cochlear implants.     

Beneficial auditory and cognitive effects of auditory brainstem implantation in children

CONCLUSION: This preliminary study demonstrates the development of hearing ability and shows that there is a significant improvement in some cognitive parameters related to selective visual/spatial attention and to fluid or multisensory reasoning, in children fitted with auditory brainstem implantation (ABI). The improvement in cognitive paramenters is due to several factors, among which there is certainly, as demonstrated in the literature on a cochlear implants (CIs), the activation of the auditory sensory canal, which was previously absent. The findings of the present study indicate that children with cochlear or cochlear nerve abnormalities with associated cognitive deficits should not be excluded from ABI implantation. OBJECTIVES: The indications for ABI have been extended over the last 10 years to adults with non-tumoral (NT) cochlear or cochlear nerve abnormalities that cannot benefit from CI. We demonstrated that the ABI with surface electrodes may provide sufficient stimulation of the central auditory system in adults for open set speech recognition. These favourable results motivated us to extend ABI indications to children with profound hearing loss who were not candidates for a CI. This study investigated the performances of young deaf children undergoing ABI, in terms of their auditory perceptual development and their non-verbal cognitive abilities. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In our department from 2000 to 2006, 24 children aged 14 months to 16 years received an ABI for different tumour and non-tumour diseases. Two children had NF2 tumours. Eighteen children had bilateral cochlear nerve aplasia. In this group, nine children had associated cochlear malformations, two had unilateral facial nerve agenesia and two had combined microtia, aural atresia and middle ear malformations. Four of these children had previously been fitted elsewhere with a CI with no auditory results. One child had bilateral incomplete cochlear partition (type II); one child, who had previously been fitted unsuccessfully elsewhere with a CI, had auditory neuropathy; one child showed total cochlear ossification bilaterally due to meningitis; and one child had profound hearing loss with cochlear fractures after a head injury. Twelve of these children had multiple associated psychomotor handicaps. The retrosigmoid approach was used in all children. Intraoperative electrical auditory brainstem responses (EABRs) and postoperative EABRs and electrical middle latency responses (EMLRs) were performed. Perceptual auditory abilities were evaluated with the Evaluation of Auditory Responses to Speech (EARS) battery - the Listening Progress Profile (LIP), the Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (MAIS), the Meaningful Use of Speech Scale (MUSS) - and the Category of Auditory Performance (CAP). Cognitive evaluation was performed on seven children using the Leiter International Performance Scale - Revised (LIPS-R) test with the following subtests: Figure ground, Form completion, Sequential order and Repeated pattern. RESULTS: No postoperative complications were observed. All children consistently used their devices for >75% of waking hours and had environmental sound awareness and utterance of words and simple sentences. Their CAP scores ranged from 1 to 7 (average =4); with MAIS they scored 2-97.5% (average =38%); MUSS scores ranged from 5 to 100% (average =49%) and LIP scores from 5 to 100% (average =45%). Owing to associated disabilities, 12 children were given other therapies (e.g. physical therapy and counselling) in addition to speech and aural rehabilitation therapy. Scores for two of the four subtests of LIPS-R in this study increased significantly during the first year of auditory brainstem implant use in all seven children selected for cognitive evaluation.     

Electrophysiological mapping of the cochlear nucleus with multi-channel bipolar surface microelectrodes

Auditory potentials in response to electrical stimulation of the cochlear nucleus were recorded in guinea pigs using two types of multi-channel surface microelectrodes with inter-electrode distance of 100 and 200 μm. Unequivocal waves of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABRs), which increased in amplitude with increasing stimulation current, were consistently observed. Electrophysiological mapping with these multichannel electrodes could clearly distinguish stimulation points showing positive EABRs from points showing undetectable EABRs, indicating that multi-channel surface microelectrodes have great potential in clinical use to determine the optimal location for the positioning of auditory brainstem implants, and may allow more precise discrimination of pitch. Further study to clarify the optimal inter-electrode distance for humans is necessary before application to physiological mapping in the human cochlear nucleus.     

Cochlear pathology following chronic electrical stimulation using non charge balanced stimuli.

During the course of a chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation study using charge balanced biphasic current pulses, one animal inadvertently received a short period of direct current (DC) stimulation at a level of approximately 1 microA. Subsequent, the animal was chronically stimulated using a poorly charge balanced waveform that produced a DC level of approximately 2 microA. Extensive pathological changes were observed within the cochlea. These changes included widespread spiral ganglion cell loss and new bone growth that extended throughout all turns of the cochlea. Significant changes in the morphology of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR) were associated with these pathological changes. EABRs recorded prior to the DC stimulation exhibited a normal waveform morphology. However, responses recorded during the course of the DC stimulation were dominated by a short latency response believed to be vestibular in origin. The response thresholds were also significantly higher than levels recorded before the DC stimulation. In contrast, the contralateral cochlea, stimulated using charge balanced stimuli, showed no evidence of adverse pathological changes. Furthermore, EABRs evoked from this cochlea remained stable throughout the chronic stimulation period. Although preliminary, the present results illustrate the adverse nature of poorly charge balanced electrical stimuli. These results have important implications for both the design of neural prostheses and the use of DC stimuli to suppress tinnitus in patients.     

Beneficial auditory and cognitive effects of auditory brainstem implantation in children

Conclusion: This preliminary study demonstrates the development of hearing ability and shows that there is a significant improvement in some cognitive parameters related to selective visual/spatial attention and to fluid or multisensory reasoning, in children fitted with auditory brainstem implantation (ABI). The improvement in cognitive paramenters is due to several factors, among which there is certainly, as demonstrated in the literature on a cochlear implants (CIs), the activation of the auditory sensory canal, which was previously absent. The findings of the present study indicate that children with cochlear or cochlear nerve abnormalities with associated cognitive deficits should not be excluded from ABI implantation. Objectives: The indications for ABI have been extended over the last 10 years to adults with non-tumoral (NT) cochlear or cochlear nerve abnormalities that cannot benefit from CI. We demonstrated that the ABI with surface electrodes may provide sufficient stimulation of the central auditory system in adults for open set speech recognition. These favourable results motivated us to extend ABI indications to children with profound hearing loss who were not candidates for a CI. This study investigated the performances of young deaf children undergoing ABI, in terms of their auditory perceptual development and their non-verbal cognitive abilities. Patients and methods: In our department from 2000 to 2006, 24 children aged 14 months to 16 years received an ABI for different tumour and non-tumour diseases. Two children had NF2 tumours. Eighteen children had bilateral cochlear nerve aplasia. In this group, nine children had associated cochlear malformations, two had unilateral facial nerve agenesia and two had combined microtia, aural atresia and middle ear malformations. Four of these children had previously been fitted elsewhere with a CI with no auditory results. One child had bilateral incomplete cochlear partition (type II); one child, who had previously been fitted unsuccessfully elsewhere with a CI, had auditory neuropathy; one child showed total cochlear ossification bilaterally due to meningitis; and one child had profound hearing loss with cochlear fractures after a head injury. Twelve of these children had multiple associated psychomotor handicaps. The retrosigmoid approach was used in all children. Intraoperative electrical auditory brainstem responses (EABRs) and postoperative EABRs and electrical middle latency responses (EMLRs) were performed. Perceptual auditory abilities were evaluated with the Evaluation of Auditory Responses to Speech (EARS) battery – the Listening Progress Profile (LIP), the Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (MAIS), the Meaningful Use of Speech Scale (MUSS) – and the Category of Auditory Performance (CAP). Cognitive evaluation was performed on seven children using the Leiter International Performance Scale – Revised (LIPS-R) test with the following subtests: Figure ground, Form completion, Sequential order and Repeated pattern. Results: No postoperative complications were observed. All children consistently used their devices for >75% of waking hours and had environmental sound awareness and utterance of words and simple sentences. Their CAP scores ranged from 1 to 7 (average =4); with MAIS they scored 2–97.5% (average =38%); MUSS scores ranged from 5 to 100% (average =49%) and LIP scores from 5 to 100% (average =45%). Owing to associated disabilities, 12 children were given other therapies (e.g. physical therapy and counselling) in addition to speech and aural rehabilitation therapy. Scores for two of the four subtests of LIPS-R in this study increased significantly during the first year of auditory brainstem implant use in all seven children selected for cognitive evaluation.     

Nucleus24型人工耳蜗使用者电诱发听神经复合动作电位的测定

目的 :探讨电诱发听神经复合动作电位 (ECAP)的特点及在人工耳蜗临床中的应用价值和意义。方法 :应用NRT(neuralresponsetelemetry)软件 ,通过体外言语处理器和耳蜗内的植入电极系统 ,采用单极模式电极刺激和近场记录方法 ,对 37例NucleusCI2 4M装置使用者进行ECAP的记录。对其中 12例使用者做了行为测试。结果 :87.6 %的使用者记录到ECAP波形。分析了有行为阈值的 12例测试者的ECAP阈值和行为阈值的关系 ,二者之间存在显著的相关性。结论 :ECAP的检出率高且波形稳定可靠 ,在临床人工耳蜗装置的调试中可作为对行为测试的补充 ;对于年幼儿童和首次开机的患者的调试尤其重要     

Electrophysiologic effects of placing cochlear implant electrodes in a perimodiolar position in young children

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to intraoperatively record the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR) before and after placement of the electrode positioning system (EPS) (CII Bionic Ear with HiFocus I cochlear implant electrode array) as well as before and after stylet removal (Nucleus Contour cochlear implant electrode array). It was hypothesized that physiologic changes would occur after perimodiolar positioning of the electrode array and these changes would be evident from the EABR recordings. STUDY DESIGN: Consecutive young (11-36 month old) pediatric cochlear implant recipients (n = 17) had intraoperative EABRs recorded from three intracochlear electrodes that represented apical, medial, and basal locations. Wave V amplitudes and thresholds were studied relative to electrode location and pre- versus postperimodiolar positioning. These evoked potential measures were analyzed for statistical significance. SETTING: Tertiary referral children's hospital/medical college. RESULTS: Wave V thresholds of the EABR were lower, and amplitudes were larger after perimodiolar positioning, although the changes were dependent on electrode location and implant design. Statistically significant decreases in EABR wave V threshold and increases in suprathreshold wave V amplitude were found for the basal electrode for the CII Bionic Ear HiFocus I and for the apical electrode for the Nucleus Contour. CONCLUSIONS: Placement of either the CII Bionic Ear HiFocus I or Nucleus Contour cochlear implant electrode array in the perimodiolar position in young children resulted in less electrical current necessary to stimulate the auditory system. Changes in electrophysiologic thresholds and amplitudes, measured with EABR, indicate that the electrode array is placed closer to the modiolus with both electrode designs.     

儿童孤独症患者脑干听觉诱发

目的通过观察儿童孤独症患者脑干听觉诱发电位的改变,探讨听觉诱发电位检测在听觉障碍儿童孤独症诊断中的临床意义.方法按DSM-IV诊断标准确诊的15例孤独症患儿和14例正常对照组,同期接受听觉诱发反应检测,比较两组间波I～V各波峰潜伏期、波峰潜伏期差和波幅的差异.结果孤独症患儿左侧波V、右侧波II峰间潜伏期和右侧I～III、I～V峰间潜伏期差较对照组显著延长(P<0.05～0.005),孤独症组右侧波III振幅较对照组增高(P<0.05),其他各指标两组间无显著性差异.结论孤独症患儿脑干听觉诱发电位的突出改变是潜伏期有延长的趋势;对就诊于耳鼻咽喉科的听阈正常而有听觉障碍,言语交往能力差,脑干听觉诱发电位检查潜伏期延长的儿童,应警惕孤独症或其他神经精神发育障碍.     

听神经病听力学分析

目的 探讨听神经病的听觉电生理特点。方法 总结了10例听神经病患者的病史、纯音测听、镫骨肌反射、听性脑干反应（auditory brainstem response,ABR)、耳蜗电图、畸变产物耳声发射（distortion product otoacoustic emission,DPOAE)及对侧白噪声抑制试验、中潜伏期反应和慢皮层反应。5例患者作了颅脑CT或磁共振成像（magnetic resonance imaging,MRI)。结果 患者男女兼有，平均年龄为20．3岁，10余岁的青少年占多数。9例主诉双耳听力下降，1例双耳鸣。纯音测听示19耳为轻度至中度的低频下降型感音神经性听力损失，听力损失最严重的频率为0．5kHz或（和）0．25kHz；1耳听力正常。19耳镫骨肌反射消失，1耳纯音测听为上升型曲线者反射阈提高。ABR不能引出或仅出现波V和（和）波1。全部病例均可记录到DPOAE，但不能被对侧噪声抑制。耳蜗电图示大部分病例动作电位（action potential,AP)消失或振幅很小，负总和电位（negative summating potential,-SP)振幅绝对平均值为0．595μV，慢皮层反应皆正常，6例测中潜伏期反应5例正常。CT或MRI无异常发现。结论 听神经病早期纯音测听可正常，但其镫骨肌反射和ABR消失或阈值升高，其确切病变部位尚不明了，可能位于脑干平面以下的听觉系统。     

Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates. IV. Effects of stimulus intensity.

High rate intracochlear electrical stimulation using stimulus intensities well above clinical limits can induce a significant reduction in the excitability of the auditory nerve as measured by a reduction in the amplitude of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR). The purpose of the present study was to assess the effect of stimulus intensity on these stimulus induced changes by comparing the effects of acute stimulation using stimulus intensities within normal clinical levels (6 dB and 12 dB above EABR threshold) and significantly above normal clinical levels (> 20 dB above EABR threshold; 0.34 microC/phase). Stimulus rates of 200, 400, or 1000 pulses/s (pps) were delivered to bipolar scala tympani electrodes. EABRs were recorded before and periodically following 2 h of continuous stimulation. No reduction in EABR amplitude was observed following stimulation at 6 dB above EABR threshold for the three stimulus rates examined. However, EABRs were reduced when stimulated at 12 dB above EABR threshold at 400 pps, and significantly reduced when stimulated at a rate of 1000 pps. Immediate post-stimulus response amplitudes of wave III were 63% and 35% of the pre-stimulus amplitude at 400 and 1000 pps respectively. More significant reductions in EABR amplitude were observed following stimulation at levels more than 20 dB above EABR threshold for both 400 and 1000 pps stimuli. Our findings indicate that stimulus induced changes in EABR amplitude are related to both stimulus rate and stimulus intensity. Moreover, stimulation using intensities within the normal clinical range show little evidence of prolonged reductions in auditory nerve excitability at stimulus rates of up to 1000 pps.     

Brainstem auditory evoked potentials after irradiation of nasopharyngeal carcinoma--report on two cases with myelopathy of the brainstem

Brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEP) were recorded in two patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) irradiated 14 and three years ago respectively and compared with 15 healthy controls. The patients had features of post-irradiation myelopathy of the brainstem with reduced gag reflex, unilateral vocal cord paralysis and fasciculation of the tongue. The first patient had a blind left eye. The second patient had quadriparesis. All ears revealed post-irradiation otitis media changes and mixed deafness. BAEP was not recognizable in the left ear of the first patient and was normal in the left ear of the second patient. Simultaneous electrocochleogram and BAEP were recorded from the right ear of the first case. The wave I-V latency interval were prolonged in both right ears. In the absence of local recurrence and brain secondaries, these BAEP changes are attributed to the post-irradiation myelopathy of brainstem.     

Electrical stimulation activates two different sites within the guinea pig cochlea

This study investigates whether auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) can be used to assess the functioning of electrically stimulated cochleas. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABRs) were recorded in guinea pigs with normal hearing and guinea pigs deafened by amikacin, a powerful ototoxic antibiotic, combined with diuretic aminooxyacetic acid (AOAA). Two different types of EABRs were observed in normal animals, depending on the electrical pulse intensity applied to the round window: long-latency brainstem responses were evoked by low stimulation intensities, short-latency brainstem responses by high intensities. The absence of effect of strychnine applied intracochlearly ruled out the possibility of medial efferents being involved in these responses. Conversely, an intracochlear application of tetrodotoxin (TTX), an Na⁺-channel blocker, resulted in the disappearance of both types of responses, attesting that the sites activated by the electrical stimulation were located within the cochlea. In AOAA/ amikacin poisoned cochleas, in which most of the hair cells were missing with apparently normal ganglion neurons, the long-latency brainstem responses evoked by low intensities were completely lacking. These findings suggest that low currents applied to the round window of the guinea pig cochlea primarily activate the hair cells, the neurons being directly excited at higher intensities.     

Effect of stimulation parameters on electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses

It is evident that the conventional technique for cochlear implant adjustment is not suitable for children in their first years of life. In order to find a solution to this problem, the possibility of electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR) recording was investigated. EABRs were recorded in 9 patients with the Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant. The main problems that have to be solved during EABR recording in cochlear implantees are: i) EABR distortion due to the stimulus artefact: and ii) difference in the stimulus presentation rate during EABR registration (low pulse rate) and conventional psychophysical threshold estimation (high pulse rate) in cochlear implant patients. The influence of stimulus artefact on the recording results was minimized by setting the implant to the widest amplifier frequency band and by zeroing the initial segment containing the stimulus artefact with subsequent zero-phase digital filtering. The dependence of the EABR amplitude and latency on the stimulus intensity, width, electrode location and interstimulus interval was investigated. It was concluded that despite the difference revealed between absolute values of EABR thresholds and psychophysical threshold levels, it is possible to calculate implant adjustment parameters based on the EABR data with the proper correction applied.     

Abnormal timing delays in auditory brainstem responses evoked by bilateral cochlear implant use in children.

HYPOTHESIS: A period of unilateral implant use before bilateral implantation affects timing of brainstem processes measured by the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR). BACKGROUND: EABR latencies decrease with unilateral implant use potentially disrupting binaural timing cues important in auditory brainstem processing of bilateral input. METHODS: EABRs were evoked by electrical pulses from the left, right, and both implants simultaneously in 3 groups of children. All were initially implanted at ages younger than 3 years and had the following: 1) a long delay (>2 yr [n = 16]), 2) a short delay (<1 yr [n = 15]), or 3) no delay (n = 15) between left and right ear implantation. Responses were recorded on the first day of bilateral implant use and 3 and 9 months thereafter. RESULTS: Relative to responses evoked in the experienced ear, the naive ear showed prolonged latency in both the EABR peaks and the binaural difference response. After 3 and 9 months of bilateral implant use, the relative prolongation decreased in the long and short delay groups, but significant differences persisted in the former. No clear differences in latencies evoked by the left versus right implant were found at any time point in children receiving bilateral implants simultaneously. CONCLUSION: Results suggest potential disruptions to binaural brainstem processing based on timing cues in children receiving a second cochlear implant after more than 2 years of unilateral implant use that persist through at least the first 9 months of bilateral implant use.     

An evoked potential study of the developmental time course of the auditory nerve and brainstem in children using cochlear implants

Central auditory responses to electrical stimulation from a cochlear implant were studied in 75 pre-lingually deafened children and 11 adults. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR) latencies significantly decreased with duration of cochlear implant use and were not significantly affected by the age at implant activation. Significant decreases in early latency waves and interwaves occurred within the first 1-2 months of implant use, whereas longer term changes (6-12 months) were found for eV and eIII-eV, which measure activity in the more rostral brainstem. Comparisons to acoustically evoked auditory brainstem response (ABR) in children with normal hearing suggested shorter interwave EABR latencies, reflecting either distinct neural generators or increased neural synchrony, but similar rates of change in the later latency eV and eIII-eV with time in sound. In sum, normal-like development of the rostral auditory brainstem is promoted by cochlear implant use in children of a wide range of ages.     

Sensorineural hearing loss during development: morphological and physiological response of the cochlea and auditory brainstem

We have investigated the effects of sensorineural hearing loss on the cochlea and central auditory system of profoundly deafened cats. Seventeen adult cats were used: four had normal hearing; 12 were deafened neonatally for periods of < 2.5 years (five bilaterally, seven unilaterally); and one animal had a long-term (approximately 8 years) profound bilateral hearing loss. Bipolar scala tympani stimulating electrodes were bilaterally implanted in each animal, and electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABRs) were recorded in an acute study to evaluate the basic physiologic response properties of the deafened auditory pathway. The cochleae and cochlear nuclei (CN) of each animal were examined with light microscopy. Spiral ganglion cell density in neonatally deafened cochleae was 17% of normal, and only 1.5% of normal in the long-term deaf animal. There was a 46% reduction in total CN volume in neonatally deafened animals compared to normal, and a 60% reduction in the long-term deaf animal. Neural density in the anteroventral CN of bilaterally deafened animals was 37% higher than normal; 44% higher in the long-term deaf animal. Significantly, however, we saw no evidence of a loss of neurones within the anteroventral CN in any deafened animal. There was a significant increase in EABR threshold and wave IV latency in the deafened animals, and a significant decrease in response amplitude and input/output function gradient. Again, these changes were more extensive in the long-term deaf animal. These data show that a sensorineural hearing loss can evoke significant morphological and physiological changes within the cochlea and auditory brainstem, and these changes become greater with duration of deafness. It remains to be seen whether these changes can be reversed following the introduction of afferent activity via chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.     

First auditory brainstem implant in the Czech Republic

In the Czech Republic, the first implantation of a stimulation electrode into the brainstem was performed on 11 January 1999 in the Department of ORL, Head and Neck Surgery, The First Medical Faculty, Charles University in Prague, University Hospital Motol. The selected patient was a 40-year-old woman with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) who had previously undergone bilateral vestibular schwannoma surgery. Both tumours had been radically removed, the left-sided tumour in 1987, the right-sided one in 1988. She had been completely deaf since the last operation, i.e., for 11 years. The surgery was realized by the international cooperation of three teams. Placement of the electrode pad of the Nucleus CI21 + 1M system on the ventral and dorsal cochlear nuclei was performed. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABRs) proved the correct position of the electrode array. The post-operative course was uneventful. Six weeks after the surgery the patient received her speech processor. Since that time, the patient already absolved several sessions of a speech processor tune-up. She uses the device as an aid in lip-reading. No adverse or pathological side effects have been observed. The patient was the 45th person in Europe to receive an ABI and the first in the Czech Republic.