Location, size and morphological characteristics of left atrial thrombi as assessed by echocardiography in patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease.

AIMS: This study aimed to assess the use of transthoracic and transoesophageal echocardiography in diagnosing the thrombi located in the left atrium and/or left atrial appendage in patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease, and to investigate the characteristics of thrombi in comparison to intraoperative findings. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study group was comprised of 474 patients who underwent transthoracic and transoesophageal echocardiography prior to mitral valve surgery. Location, thickness and morphological characteristics of thrombi were determined by transoesophageal echocardiography. Intraoperative assessment disclosed left atrial thrombi in 105 patients. Thickness of thrombi < or = 1cm, and thrombi confined to left atrial appendage were associated with false-negative results by transthoracic echocardiography. However, diameter and morphological characteristics of thrombi, left atrial and left atrial appendage size, and the presence of the spontaneous echo contrast were not associated with the diagnosis of thrombi by transthoracic echocardiography. For overall left atrial thrombi, sensitivity and specificity of transthoracic echocardiography were 32%, and 94%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of transoesophageal echocardiography for thrombi in the left atrial appendage were 98%, and 98%, for thrombi in the main left atrial cavity were 81%, and 99%, and for thrombi located in both left atrium and appendage cavities were 100%, and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease, detection of left atrial thrombi by transthoracic echocardiography seems to be determined by thickness and location of thrombi. The multilobed structure of the left atrial appendage and artifacts over posterior wall of the left atrium may still prevent precise diagnosis even with transoesophageal echocardiography.     

Role of transoesophageal echocardiography in evaluation of cardiogenic embolism.

OBJECTIVE--To determine the value of transoesophageal echocardiography in the assessment of selected patients at risk of cardiogenic embolism or after it. DESIGN--Prospective comparison of the results of transoesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography. Transoesophageal echocardiography was performed with a 5 MHz single plane phased array transducer. SETTING--University teaching hospital. PATIENTS--100 patients referred for transoesophageal echocardiography after a cerebral ischaemic event or peripheral arterial embolism (n = 63), before percutaneous balloon dilatation of the mitral valve (n = 23), or before electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (n = 14). RESULTS--Transthoracic echocardiography showed potential sources of embolism in four patients including left ventricular thrombus in two patients (with one false positive), left atrial appendage thrombus (n = 1), and patent foramen ovale (n = 1). Transoesophageal echocardiography showed 59 potential embolic sources in 45 patients including left atrial spontaneous echo contrast (n = 33), left atrial appendage thrombus (n = 13), left ventricular thrombus (n = 5), patent foramen ovale (n = 3), left ventricular spontaneous echo contrast (n = 2), mitral valve prosthesis thrombus (n = 1), mitral valve prolapse (n = 1), and pronounced aortic atheroma (n = 1). Transoesophagal echocardiography showed potential embolic sources in 36/53 (68%) patients with atrial fibrillation compared with 9/47 (19%) patients in sinus rhythm. Percutaneous balloon dilatation of the mitral valve was performed without embolic complications in 18 patients without left atrial thrombi and in three patients with small fixed thrombi in the left atrial appendage. It was cancelled in two patients with large thrombi in the left atrial appendage. Cardioversion was performed without embolic complications in 14 patients without left atrial thrombi. CONCLUSIONS--Transoesophageal echocardiography detects potential sources of embolism better than transthoracic echocardiography in selected patients at risk of cardiogenic embolism or after it.     

Role of transoesophageal echocardiography in evaluation of cardiogenic embolism.

OBJECTIVE--To determine the value of transoesophageal echocardiography in the assessment of selected patients at risk of cardiogenic embolism or after it. DESIGN--Prospective comparison of the results of transoesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography. Transoesophageal echocardiography was performed with a 5 MHz single plane phased array transducer. SETTING--University teaching hospital. PATIENTS--100 patients referred for transoesophageal echocardiography after a cerebral ischaemic event or peripheral arterial embolism (n = 63), before percutaneous balloon dilatation of the mitral valve (n = 23), or before electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (n = 14). RESULTS--Transthoracic echocardiography showed potential sources of embolism in four patients including left ventricular thrombus in two patients (with one false positive), left atrial appendage thrombus (n = 1), and patent foramen ovale (n = 1). Transoesophageal echocardiography showed 59 potential embolic sources in 45 patients including left atrial spontaneous echo contrast (n = 33), left atrial appendage thrombus (n = 13), left ventricular thrombus (n = 5), patent foramen ovale (n = 3), left ventricular spontaneous echo contrast (n = 2), mitral valve prosthesis thrombus (n = 1), mitral valve prolapse (n = 1), and pronounced aortic atheroma (n = 1). Transoesophagal echocardiography showed potential embolic sources in 36/53 (68%) patients with atrial fibrillation compared with 9/47 (19%) patients in sinus rhythm. Percutaneous balloon dilatation of the mitral valve was performed without embolic complications in 18 patients without left atrial thrombi and in three patients with small fixed thrombi in the left atrial appendage. It was cancelled in two patients with large thrombi in the left atrial appendage. Cardioversion was performed without embolic complications in 14 patients without left atrial thrombi. CONCLUSIONS--Transoesophageal echocardiography detects potential sources of embolism better than transthoracic echocardiography in selected patients at risk of cardiogenic embolism or after it.     

Transthoracic echocardiography versus transesophageal echocardiography in detecting cardiac sources of embolism

Although the yield of potential cardiac sources of embolism by echocardiography in patients with stroke and arterial embolism has been low, with the advent of transesophageal echocardiography, a renewed enthusiasm for echocardiography in these patients has developed. This article reviews the six major studies comparing transthoracic to transesophageal echocardiography in the search for potential cardiac sources of embolism. The overall yield of transesophageal echocardiography in these studies for potential cardiac sources of embolism is 43% compared to 14% by transthoracic echocardiography in a total of 367 patients. In patients without clinical cardiac disease, the yield is lower but still substantially higher by transesophageal echocardiography (24% compared to 7% by transthoracic echocardiography). For left atrial thrombus, left atrial spontaneous contrast, patent foreman ovale, and atrial septal aneurysm (ASA), transesophageal echocardiography is clearly superior than transthoracic echocardiography. Data on the detection of mitral valve prolapse and left ventricular thrombus are conflicting and neither method is clearly superior. In addition, transesophageal echocardiography identifies certain abnormalities including debris in the aorta and prosthetic strands that transthoracic echocardiography is incapable of identifying. Although transthoracic echocardiography should continue to be the initial screening modality for stroke patients, transesophageal echocardiography should be performed when surface findings are negative or equivocal in patients with likely cardioembolic stroke.     

High risk of cardiogenic cerebral embolism for very elderly patients in sinus rhythm with left atrial appendage flow velocity below 50 cm/s

Recent clinical trials have demonstrated that patients in sinus rhythm after cardioversion are still at risk of suffering from embolic events, but the precise mechanisms underlying the occurrence of cardiogenic cerebral embolism remain to be determined. All 72 patients aged 75 or over who were consecutively referred to our department between October 2003 and March 2006 were divided into three groups; these were: group 1, 17 patients in sinus rhythm after cardioversion; group 2, 18 patients without any history of atrial fibrillation; and group 3, 37 patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. Using transesophageal echocardiography, we evaluated the left atrial appendage flow velocity, left atrial appendage dimension, spontaneous echocardiographic contrast in the left atrium, and the presence of thrombus in the left atrial appendage. Left atrial appendage flow velocity was significantly lower in group 1 compared with group 2 (38.2 ± 6.1 vs 61.4 ± 7.4 cm/s, P  < 0.001), but was even lower in group 3 (25.1 ± 9.8 cm/s, P  < 0.001 vs group 1). Spontaneous echocardiographic contrast in the left atrium, thrombus in the left atrial appendage and cardiogenic cerebral embolism showed a close relationship with left atrial appendage flow velocity, and were more frequent when left atrial appendage flow velocity was less than 50 cm/s. Very elderly patients in long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm with an left atrial appendage flow velocity of less than 50 cm/s would have a high risk of cardiogenic cerebral embolism.     

Usefulness of transesophageal echocardiography for the detection of left atrial thrombi in patients with rheumatic heart disease

Transesophageal (TEE) and transthoracic (TTE) echocardiograms were performed in 110 patients with rheumatic heart disease to evaluate the usefulness of these methods for the detection of left atrial thrombi. TEE was better than TTE for detecting left atrial thrombi (21 vs 9). The thrombi not detected by TTE were in the left atrial appendage in ten and over the left atrial posterior wall in two. Patients with left atrial thrombi had significantly smaller mitral valve area (P less than 0.01) and greater left atrial dimension (P less than 0.05) than those without. All patients with left atrial thrombi had atrial fibrillation. Thirty-one patients underwent surgical intervention and 13 were found to have left atrial thrombi. TEE detected left atrial thrombi in all 13 patients with a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 100%, and accuracy of 100%, while TTE detected left atrial thrombi in only nine of these 13 patients with a sensitivity of 69.2%, specificity of 100%, and accuracy of 87.1%. Thus, TEE is superior to TTE for the detection of left atrial thrombi, especially for those thrombi located in the left atrial appendage and along the left atrial posterior wall.     

Atrial thrombi-a prospective follow-up study over 3 years with transesophageal echocardiography and cranial magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial thrombi have an increased risk for cerebral embolism. However, there is little knowledge about the long-term fate of atrial thrombi and the incidence of cerebral embolism in patients under oral anticoagulation. METHODS: Consecutive patients with persistent or permanent AF and left atrial (LA) thrombi were included in the study. We performed serial and prospective transesophageal echocardiography, cranial magnetic resonance imaging, and clinical examinations during a period of 3 years. Oral anticoagulation was continued or initiated in all patients. A target INR of 2.5 was intended in all patients. RESULTS: Forty-three patients with LA thrombi and persistent or permanent AF were included. During the follow-up period 31(72%) of the thrombi disappeared. Patients with disappearance of thrombi had significantly smaller thrombi (P < 0.01), a lower echogenicity of thrombi (P < 0.01), and a lower LA volume (P = 0.02). Twenty-two (51%) patients suffered from cerebral embolism and/or death during the observation period. Five patients died due to embolic events. The only independent predictors of cerebral embolism were an elevated peak emptying velocity of the LA appendage (P < 0.001) and a history of previous thromboembolism (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with persistent or permanent AF and atrial thrombi have a high long-term risk of cerebral embolism and/or death (51%) even despite the oral anticoagulation therapy. Thrombus size may predict thrombus resolution under continued anticoagulation.     

Transthoracic Doppler echocardiographic measurement of left atrial appendage blood flow velocity: comparison with transoesophageal measurement.

AIM: We validated transthoracic echocardiographic measurements of left atrial appendage flow velocity by comparing them with transoesophageal echocardiographic measurements. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighty-four consecutive patients (mean age, 64.6 years) with various cardiac diseases, who underwent both transthoracic echocardiography and transoesophageal echocardiography were studied. Thirty-two patients were in sinus rhythm, and the remaining 52 patients were in atrial fibrillation. On transthoracic echocardiography, the transducer was placed somewhat superior and outside from the position viewing the conventional parasternal short-axis image of the aortic valve, so that the angle between left atrial appendage midline and Doppler beam could be narrowed. The left atrial appendage flow velocity pattern was recorded by pulsed Doppler mode with a sampling volume placed at the left atrial appendage orifice on both transthoracic echocardiography and transoesophageal echocardiography. In both approaches, the peak emptying velocity (LAA-E) and the peak filling velocity (LAA-F) of the left atrial appendage were measured. In sinus rhythm, the LAA-E was detectable in 25 of the 32 patients (78.1%) and the LAA-F in 20 of the 32 patients (62.5%). Both LAA-E and LAA-F were detectable in 46 of the 52 patients (88.5%) in atrial fibrillation. Good correlations of LAA-E and LAA-F were observed between transthoracic echocardiography and transoesophageal echocardiography measurements in sinus rhythm (r=0.94, r=0.95, respectively; both, P<0.0001) and in atrial fibrillation (r=0.89, r=0.95, respectively; both, P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The left atrial appendage flow velocities could be sufficiently recorded and assessed by transthoracic echocardiography in 84 Japanese unselected consecutive patients with sinus rhythm or atrial fibrillation.     

Left atrial thrombi despite anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy

To investigate risk factors for embolization in patients with echocardiographically detected left atrial thrombi and to evaluate thrombus development, we examined 29 patients with transesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography at two points during a follow-up of 18 months. We compared patients with a history of possible arterial embolization0 (n = 13) with those without (n = 16) in regard to age, gender, left atrial dilatation, localization of the thrombus in the left atrial cavity, spontaneous echo contrast, and atrial fibrillation. Eight patients were treated with aspirin, 20 with phenprocoumon. Only left atrial spontaneous contrast was associated with thrombembolism (10/15 patients with spontaneous contrast experienced arterial embolism; p = 0.038). in six patients arterial embolism occurred after thrombus detection (14% per patient per year). Four of these patients were treated with phenprocoumon, two with aspirin. At reexamination, one thrombus was detected in the patient without anticoagulant treatment and one thrombus was detected in the 8 patients treated with aspirin (13%), compared with ten thrombi detected in the 20 patients (50%) treated with phenprocoumon (p = NS). in 17 patients no thrombus was seen at reexamination. Since only 2 patients had undergone thrombectomy and 3 experienced arterial embolism during follow-up, thrombi disappeared under medical therapy in 12 patients. Patients with left atrial thrombi have a high risk of arterial embolization despite proper anticoagulative or antiplatelet treatment. Embolization occurs significantly more often if spontaneous echo contrast can be visualized. Left atrial thrombi can be reduced in size by the administration of antiplatelet and anticoagulative agents. Detection of left atrial thrombi with transesophageal echocardiography identifies this patient population at an increased risk of embolization.     

Visualization of left atrial appendage and assessment of its function by transthoracic second harmonic imaging and contrast-enhanced pulsed Doppler.

BACKGROUND: Low flow velocity within the left atrial appendage, as assessed by transoesophageal echocardiography, is a predictor of thromboembolism and of a low success rate of cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. However, the semi-invasive nature does limit its serial application as a screening technique. METHODS AND RESULTS: We investigated the value of transthoracic second harmonic echocardiography and pulsed Doppler at baseline and after intravenous contrast injection to visualize the left atrial appendage and assess blood flow velocities within its cavity. We studied 51 consecutive patients undergoing transoesophageal echocardiography. After transoesophageal echocardiography, transthoracic second harmonic imaging was performed and the left atrial appendage was visualized in 46 patients. Interpretable pulsed Doppler tracings of left atrial appendage flow were obtained at baseline in 39 patients and in 45 patients during Levovist administration. The correlations between peak emptying velocity of left atrial appendage as measured by transoesophageal echocardiography and by transthoracic standard and contrast-enhanced Doppler were 0.81 and 0.91, respectively. The agreement between transoesophageal echocardiography and transthoracic contrast-enhanced pulsed Doppler echocardiography in classifying left atrial appendage flow velocity patterns was 93%. Left atrial appendage thrombus was detected by transthoracic second harmonic imaging in only one of the eight patients shown by transoesophageal echocardiography to have a thrombus. However, all but one of the patients with left atrial appendage thrombus and/or spontaneous echocardiographic contrast at transoesophageal echocardiography had <30cm/s left atrial appendage flow velocity by transthoracic Doppler. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that left atrial appendage can be visualized by transthoracic second harmonic imaging and that the flow velocity within its cavity is reliably measured by pulsed Doppler in a substantial fraction of patients. Contrast enhancement improves the feasibility and the accuracy of transthoracic evaluation of left atrial appendage flow velocity. The practical value of these results in predicting thromboembolic risk and success of cardioversion of atrial fibrillation needs to be proved by prospective studies.     

Diagnostic value of transesophageal echocardiography in atrial septal aneurysm

Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography was performed in 40 consecutive adult patients with an atrial septal aneurysm. In 11 (27%) of 40 patients transthoracic echocardiography failed to demonstrate the lesion and the diagnosis was established by the transesophageal approach only. Interatrial shunting, assessed by echocardiographic contrast study and/or color flow mapping, was detected in 13 (54%) of 24 patients on transthoracic imaging and in 29 (76%) of 38 patients during transesophageal echocardiography. Identification of multiple fenestrations (n=9) and thrombi within the aneurysm (n=2) could be achieved only by transesophageal ultrasound. A cerebrovascular event of suspected embolic origin occurred in 20 (50%) of 40 patients; 11 (55%) of the 20 patients had repeated cerebral events. Except for mitral valve prolapse in 2 patients and spontaneous left atrial contrast phenomenon in 1 patient no other potential cardiac source of embolism could be identified by transesophageal echocardiography. A marked thickening of the aneurysm was present in 14 (70%) of 20 patients with a cerebrovascular event versus only 4 (20%) of 20 patients without a cerebrovascular event (p<0,01). The mechanism of embolization may be both primary thrombus formation within the aneurysm and paradoxical embolization through an interatrial communication as suggested by the findings on transesophageal ultrasound in 2 patients. Although the patients of this study represent a highly selected group it may be concluded that atrial septal aneurysm is a cardiac abnormality with embolic potential. Transesophageal echocardiography has to be regarded the imaging method of choice for evaluation of this lesion.     

Left atrial appendage function in patients with mitral stenosis in sinus rhythm.

AIMS: Left atrial appendage thrombi are believed to be the source of embolism in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis in atrial fibrillation. There are a few studies which search the effects of left atrial appendage dysfunction in patients with mitral stenosis in sinus rhythm. METHODS AND RESULTS: Left atrial appendage function and flow patterns in 41 patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis in sinus rhythm and 11 healthy subjects were studied by transoesophageal echocardiography. Left atrial appendage flow profiles were recorded within the proximal third of the appendage. The left atrial appendage ejection fraction was expressed as (maximal area of appendage minimal area of appendage)/maximal area of appendage. In addition, two-dimensional imaging was used to determine the presence of spontaneous echocardiographic contrast and thrombus formation. Patients with mitral stenosis in sinus rhythm had significantly decreased left atrial appendage emptying and filling velocities compared to controls (0.40+/-0.15m/s vs 0.82+/-0.19 m/s and 0.42+/-0.21 m/s vs 0.68+/-0.28, respectively, P<0.001 and P<0.05). Compared with the control subjects, patients with mitral stenosis had significantly greater maximal area of the appendage and had reduced left atrial appendage ejection fraction (5.3+/-2.2 cm(2) vs 2.4+/-0.5 cm(2) and 50+/-16% vs 70+/-7%, respectively, P<0.001 and P<0.05). Of the patients with mitral stenosis in sinus rhythm, seven patients had spontaneous echocardiographic contrast and one of these had left atrial appendage thrombus. Compared with patients without spontaneous echocardiographic contrast, patients with spontaneous echocardiographic contrast had decreased left atrial appendage ejection fraction (33+/-21% vs 54+/-13%,P <0.01). One of the patients with mitral stenosis had central retinal artery occlusion, but thrombus was not observed in left atrial appendage. CONCLUSION: The study found that left atrial appendage dysfunction may occur in patients with mitral stenosis in sinus rhythm.     

Clinical and echocardiographic risk factors for embolization in the presence of left atrial thrombus

AIMS: The aim of our study was to evaluate the factors leading to embolization in patients with left atrial thrombi (LAT). With this purpose, we retrospectively analyzed clinical, transthoracic, transesophageal echocardiographic data of patients with LAT in the transesophageal echocardiographic evaluation. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred ninety-two patients with LAT not on anticoagulant therapy were divided into two groups according to the presence of prior ischemic stroke. The group with ischemic stroke included more patients with sinus rhythm and less patients with mitral stenosis. They had smaller left atrial diameter, more left atrial appendage spontaneous echo-contrast, higher appendage ejection fraction, and emptying velocity. CONCLUSION: Once the thrombus has been formed, cerebral embolization seems to be higher in patients with relatively preserved appendage ejection fraction and emptying velocity. Presence of atrial appendage spontaneous echo-contrast also favor embolization. Factors leading to embolization seem to differ in some respects from the causes of thrombus formation.     

Assessment of left atrial appendage by live three-dimensional echocardiography: early experience and comparison with transesophageal echocardiography

BACKGROUND: Live Three-Dimensional Echocardiography (L3D, Sonos 7500, Philips) has the potential to visualize all cardiac structures including left atrial appendage (LAA). We tested the feasibility of evaluating LAA by L3D and compared the findings to transthoracic echocardiography (2D) and in a subset of patients with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). METHODS: L3D images were obtained in 204 consecutive patients referred for routine 2D or TEE. We performed wide-angled acquisitions from parasternal and apical views. TomTec system (4D Cardio-view, RT 1.2) was used to visualize LAA from multiple vantage points. RESULTS: LAA was adequately visualized by L3D in 139 of 204 (68.1%) patients. L3D visualization was dependent on image quality, suboptimal in 100 and diagnostic in 104 patients. Overall, LAA was visualized in 93 (45.5%) patients by 2D compared to 139 (68.1%) by L3D (P < 0.0001). In 100 patients with suboptimal image quality by L3D, LAA visualization was 16% by 2D and 35% by L3D, whereas in 104 patients with diagnostic images, LAA was visualized in 77 (74%) by 2D and in all 104 (100%) patients by L3D (P < 0.0001). In 37 patients referred for transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), live three-dimensional echocardiography (L3D) visualized left atrial appendage (LAA) in 34 patients with diagnostic image quality. Eight patients with LAA thrombi on TEE had thrombi detected by L3D as well. All patients with LAA thrombus had enlarged LA by both 2D and TEE. CONCLUSIONS: L3D is a promising technique in evaluation of LAA with and without thrombi. In patients with good quality transthoracic images L3D may be used as a screening tool in assessment of LAA.     

Right Atrial Thrombi and Depressed Right Atrial Appendage Function After Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND: It has been shown that cardioversion of atrial fibrillation may result in left atrial chamber and appendage dysfunction and cause new thrombi in the left atrium. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate right atrial appendage function and assess the incidence of new right atrial thrombi after electrical cardioversion. METHODS: Transthoracic echocardiography was performed in 25 patients 4 h before and at 24 h and 7 days after electrical cardioversion to determine right and left atrial mechanical function (internal atrial defibrillation, n = 16; external electrical cardioversion, n = 9), as assessed by peak A wave velocities derived from the transtricuspid and transmitral velocity profiles. In addition, transesophageal echocardiography was performed 4 h before and 24 h after cardioversion to evaluate postcardioversion thrombus formation in the right and left atrial chambers and to assess right and left atrial appendage function. The degree of spontaneous echo contrast was noted, and peak emptying velocities of the appendages were measured before and after cardioversion. RESULTS: Peak emptying velocities of both the right atrial appendage (mean +/- SD, 0.23 +/- 0.1 vs 0.32 +/- 0.11 m/sec; P = 0.02) and the left atrial appendage (0.3 +/- 0.15 vs 0.4 +/- 0.15 m/sec; P = 0.01) were significantly lower 24 h after cardioversion compared with 4 h before cardioversion, respectively. The degree of spontaneous echo contrast increased in the left atrium after cardioversion from 1.0 +/- 1.2 to 1.9 +/- 2.1 (P = 0.02), and in the right atrium, it increased from 0.8 +/- 1.1 to 1.2 +/- 1.1 (P = 0.1) after cardioversion. Peak A wave transtricuspid velocity increased from 0.26 +/- 0.05 m/sec at 24 h to 0.38 +/- 0.06 m/sec (P = 0.001) after 7 days; respective values for transmitral peak A wave velocity were 0.39 +/- 0.15 and 0.54 +/- 0.16 m/sec (P = 0.009). No thrombi were found in either the right or left atrium before cardioversion. In two patients, new thrombi in the right atrium were detected 24 h after internal atrial defibrillation. Thrombi were located at the superior rim of the fossa ovalis in both patients with patent foramen ovale. Another patient had developed a thrombus in the left atrial appendage. CONCLUSIONS: Electrical cardioversion may not only cause left atrial chamber and appendage dysfunction and left atrial thrombi but also lead to depressed right atrial appendage function and the generation of new thrombi in the body of the right atrium.     

Comparison of transthoracic and transesophageal assessment of prosthetic valve dysfunction

Transesophageal echocardiography has added another dimension to the assessment of prosthetic valve dysfunction with high-resolution images that allow for more detailed structural evaluation of tissue and mechanical valves. This study is a retrospective analysis of 140 prosthetic valves (90 tissue, 50 mechanical) in the mitral (89), aortic (45), and tricuspid (6) position in 116 patients studied by transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography techniques. Transesophageal echocardiography was consistently better than the transthoracic technique in the evaluation of structural abnormalities of tissue valves in the mitral and aortic positions with respect to leaflet thickening, prolapse, flail, and vegetations. With transesophageal echocardiography, five tissue mitral valves had flail leaflets that were not identified by the transthoracic technique. Transesophageal echocardiography was better than transthoracic in the detection, quantification, and localization of prosthetic mitral regurgitation. Physiological mitral regurgitation was detected in 31 valves by transesophageal echocardiography compared to seven by transthoracic technique. By transesophageal echocardiography, mitral regurgitation was paravalvular in 24% compared with 4% by transthoracic technique. Left atrial spontaneous contrast was seen in 42% of the patients with a mitral prosthesis detected only by transesophageal echocardiography. Six patients had left atrial or left atrial appendage thrombus and in five patients they were detected only by transesophageal echocardiography. We conclude that transesophageal echocardiography should be a complimentary test to transthoracic studies in patients with suspected prosthetic valve dysfunction or for the follow-up of older tissue valves.     

Assessment of left atrial appendage function by biplane transesophageal echocardiography in patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation: Identification of a subgroup of patients at increased embolic risk

Objectives. This study was conducted to identify a subgroup of patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation with an increased risk for cardiogenic embolism by assessing left atrial appendage function.Background. Patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation have an increased risk for thromboembolic complications. The left atrial appendage is the most likely source for thrombus formation. It is likely that the appendage function (contraction, filling dynamics) is related to the pathogenesis of thrombus formation.Methods. Twenty-nine patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation (group I) underwent biplane transesophageal echocardiography. The maximal and minimal areas during a cardiac cycle and the peak emptying and filling velocities of the appendage were measured in both scan planes. For comparison, two additional groups were also analyzed. Group II consisted of 12 patients with chronic atrial fibrillation due to significant mitral stenosis, and group III consisted of 30 patients who were in sinus rhythm.Results. Patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation showed two distinct appendage flow patterns: either well defined peak filling and emptying waves (≥25 cm/s) with visible fibrillatory contractions of the appendage wall (“high flow profile”) or irregular, very low, peak filling and emptying waves (<25 cm/s) associated with almost no visible appendage contractions (“low flow profile”). The left atrial appendage function in the first subgroup resembles that seen in patients with sinus rhythm, whereas the appendage function in the latter subgroup resembles more the “static pouch” seen in patients with rheumatic atrial fibrillation. Events suggestive of cardiogenic embolism occurred in six patients from group I, five of whom were in the low flow profile subgroup (p < 0.05). The spontaneous echo contrast phenomenon was observed in 80% of the low flow profile subgroup but in only 5% in the high flow profile subgroup (p < 0.05). Three thrombi confined to the left atrial appendage were detected by transesophageal echocardiography in group I; all three of the patients were in the low flow profile subgroup.Conclusions. The assessment of left atrial appendage function by transesophageal echocardiography may be helpful to identify subgroups of patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrilation with an increased risk of thrombus formation.     

Secondary prognosis after cardioembolic stroke of atrial origin: the role of left atrial and left atrial appendage dysfunction

BACKGROUND: Secondary prevention studies for cardioembolic strokes show a remarkable variability in stroke recurrence rates. Various reports have raised questions regarding differences in baseline clinical characteristics and in methodology to explain this wide variability. HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of the present study is to examine the 2-year outcome after first cardioembolic stroke of atrial origin and to correlate secondary prognosis with left atrial and left atrial appendage dysfunction. METHODS: Baseline evaluation included computed tomographic and/or magnetic resonance scanning, Doppler scanning, digital subtraction angiography, and transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography to establish the diagnosis of atrial source of emboli. Twenty-six patients in nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation and 13 in sinus rhythm were followed for recurrent stroke and vascular death as endpoints (event +/-). RESULTS: Patients in sinus rhythm had a total of 23% (standard deviation +/- 12%) recurrence rate. All event (+) patients were on aspirin and died from this second cardioembolic stroke. Of patients in nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation, 50% were event (+) at the end of the first year (death rate 46%). Patients on warfarin therapy had 20% recurrence rate versus 70% on aspirin (relative risk 0, 18, 95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.48, p 0.041). Inward peak velocity of left atrial appendage was the only echocardiographic variable significantly reduced in event (+) patients (21 +/- 7 vs. 31 +/- 17 cm/s, p 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation and first atrial origin cardioembolic stroke are at increased risk for recurrence if severe dysfunction of the left atrial appendage is present and if they do not receive warfarin treatment. Patients with sinus rhythm and first atrial origin cardioembolic stroke form a small stroke subgroup, in which recurrences are accompanied by a remarkably high death rate.     

Simultaneous Right and Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus in a Patient with Atrial Fibrillation: A Lesson to Remember

We report a case of simultaneous right and left atrial appendage thrombi in a 76‐year‐old‐man with atrial fibrillation. Although transesophageal echocardiography is considered a routine diagnostic procedure, complete and comprehensive visualization of both atrial appendages is of paramount importance, particularly with the introduction of new therapeutic options like left atrial appendage exclusion devices. We expect to raise awareness among clinicians of the prevalence and implications of bilateral atrial appendage thrombi in common clinical practice.     

Transesophageal echocardiographic evidence of atrial fibrillation with systolic flow in the right atrial appendage and systolic reversal pulmonary flow in a patient with DDD permanent pacing

We report the case of a patient with atrial fibrillation on standard electrocardiogram who underwent transesophageal echocardiography to rule out presence of thrombi in heart cavities. Pulsed-wave Doppler investigation revealed multiphasic waves consistent with atrial fibrillation in the left atrial appendage, while in the right atrial appendage, a biphasic flow was registered after QRS depolarization. Some hypotheses are made about the origin of this signal.