Effects of acute and chronic nicotine on impulsive choice in rats

Impulsive choice, or preference for small immediate reinforcers over large delayed reinforcers, has been associated with cigarette smoking. The direct effects of nicotine on impulsive choice in laboratory animals are unknown. We examined the effects of acute and chronic nicotine injections, and the termination of injections, on impulsive choice in rats. Five rats made choices between a one- and a three-pellet reinforcer in a discrete trials procedure. The delay to the smaller reinforcer was always 1 s. A computer adjusted the delay to the larger reinforcer until the pattern of choices reflected indifference between the two alternatives. We assessed the effects of acute and chronic nicotine (vehicle, 0.03, 0.1, 0.3 and 1.0 mg/kg nicotine). The latency to make the first response of the session increased under the acute 1.0 mg/kg dose. There were no consistent differences in the effects of acute and chronic nicotine on response latency and lever pressing during the delays between choices. Acute injections of nicotine dose-dependently increased impulsive responding. After chronic injections, impulsive responding was increased equivalently regardless of dose, and it was increased even in the absence of nicotine. After drug injections were terminated, behavior remained impulsive for about 30 drug-free sessions, and then responding gradually returned to baseline levels. The results suggest that increases in impulsive choice were not due to anorectic effects, response biases or changes in conditioned reinforcement. Nicotine may have decreased the value of delayed reinforcers. Chronic nicotine exposure produced long-lasting but reversible increases in impulsive choice.     

Multiple-choice procedure: an efficient approach for investigating drug reinforcement in humans

Two experiments demonstrated the efficiency of assessing drug reinforcement in humans by using a novel multiple-choice procedure. The distinguishing characteristic of the procedure is that it arranges intermittent reinforcement for choices between pairs of potential reinforcers. The procedure has three key operations: (1) a subject is exposed to the potential reinforcers; (2) a subject then makes two or more choices on a questionnaire; for each choice, the subject is required to choose one of two potential reinforcers (e.g. drug vs. drug choices and/or drug vs. money choices); and (3) subsequently only one of the choices, randomly selected, is reinforced. In the present experiments, two variations of the multiple-choice procedure were evaluated in twelve male drug abusers. Both experiments assessed the reinforcing effects of three drug conditions (200 and 400) mg/70kg pentobarbital and placebo) which were presented no more often than every to other day. The experiments demonstrated dose-related choice of pentobarbital over money as well as choice of a higher dose of pentobarbital over a lower dose or placebo. Orderly data were generated with a single-session exposure to each drug condition. Multiple-choice procedures should have applicability, not only to the investigation of drug reinforcement, but also to the study of non-drug reinforcement in humans.     

Effects of dose and infusion delay on cocaine self-administration choice in rhesus monkeys

Rationale. Drug abuse is often considered a problem related to impulse-control disorders, but little is known about the factors that determine the choice to self-administer a drug in a self-control/impulsivity paradigm. Objective. The objective of the present study was to evaluate choice between a low dose of cocaine administered after a relatively short delay (impulsive option) and a high dose of cocaine following a relatively longer delay (self-control option). Methods. Rhesus monkeys self-administered intravenous cocaine in a discrete-trials choice procedure. First, choice was between different 3:1 doses (0.3/0.1 and 0.1/0.03 mg/kg per injection) following equal 30-s delays to infusion. Second, choice was between equal doses (0.1 mg/kg per injection) following 3:1 delays (30 s/10 s, 90 s/30 s, 270 s/90 s, 810 s/270 s). Third, choice was between 0.1 or 0.03 mg/kg per injection after the same 3:1 delays with the larger dose following the longer delay and the smaller dose following the shorter delay. Fourth, the same 3:1 delays were used to study choice between 0.3 and 0.1 mg/kg per injection. Results. With equal delays, the larger dose of cocaine was chosen almost exclusively, and with equal doses, the shorter delay was chosen almost exclusively. When both dose and delay were manipulated, mean large-dose (0.1 mg/kg per injection) choices for three of four subjects was 98% when the delays were the shortest (30 s/10 s), but this preference reversed as the delays increased, so that 74% of choices were for the smaller dose (0.03 mg/kg per injection) at the longest delays (810 s/270 s). This systematic decrease in large-dose choices as the absolute, but not relative, values of the delays were increased, was also observed with the higher dose combination. Conclusion. Delay discounting was supported by the present findings in that the value of a large reinforcer (higher cocaine dose) was decreased as its delay to presentation was increased. The importance of not only relative, but absolute, values of delays to drug reinforcement in determining drug choice was also demonstrated. Thus, a self-control/impulsivity paradigm can be extended to conditions with non-human subjects and drug reinforcers. Electronic Publication     

Preference reversals and effects of D-amphetamine on delay discounting in rats

Impulsive choice is correlated with behavioral problems such as attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and substance abuse. Effects of stimulant drug administration on impulsive choice are not consistent and may depend on baseline differences in impulsive choice. A within-session delay-discounting procedure in which choice was between one food pellet delivered immediately (impulsive choice) and three food pellets delivered after increasing delays (self-controlled choice) was used to determine effects of adding and subtracting delays common to both reinforcers on impulsive choice in male Sprague-Dawley rats (n=8). Delay discounting was observed and impulsive choice was quantified using area under the curve (AUC). Adding delays common to both reinforcers decreased impulsive choice and subtracting delays common to both reinforcers increased impulsive choice. Before administration of D-amphetamine (0.03-1.80 mg/kg, intraperitoneally), subjects were rank ordered into a low-AUC or a high-AUC group. Select doses of D-amphetamine decreased impulsive choice for subjects in the low-AUC group but not for subjects in the high-AUC group. These results indicate that impulsive choice can be altered by changing the delay common to both reinforcers and suggest that effects of D-amphetamine may depend, in part, on baseline differences in impulsive choice.     

The psychopharmacology of impulsive behaviour in rats VIII: effects of amphetamine,methylphenidate, and other drugs on responding maintained by a fixed consecutive number avoidance schedule

Rationale Impulsive behaviour is a component of psychiatric disorders such as bipolar disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), or personality disorders. Most experimental studies on impulsive behaviour punish impulsive choices by loss or delay of reward. In the present study, impulsive behaviour was punished by an explicitly aversive stimulus, using a novel fixed consecutive number (FCN) schedule of electric shock avoidance.Objectives This study was conducted to demonstrate stable performance using the FCN avoidance procedure, and examine the effects of drugs previously shown to affect impulsive behaviour using a conventional FCN schedule.Methods First, rats were trained in the appetitive FCN procedure. Pressing the right lever in an operant conditioning chamber after having pressed the left lever at least six times delivered a food pellet (FCN6). Responses on the right lever before completing this ratio resulted in a time out and restarted the ratio. The rats were then switched to FCN avoidance. Responses on the right lever made before completion of the ratio also resulted in food delivery, but were accompanied by an electric shock.Results Chlordiazepoxide (10.0 mg/kg), ethanol (1.0 g/kg), and haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg) increased impulsive behaviour by reducing the number of left lever responses made before the right lever was pressed. Imipramine (1.0–10.0 mg/kg) and desipramine (1.0–10.0 mg/kg) had no effect on impulsive choice. Amphetamine (0.4 and 0.8 mg/kg) and methylphenidate (6.0 mg/kg) significantly increased the mean chain length, and the proportion of very long chains, indicative of reduced impulsivity, although this did not improve efficiency.Conclusions The increases in impulsivity produced by chlordiazepoxide, ethanol, and haloperidol were similar to those under appetitive FCN schedules. In contrast, amphetamine and methylphenidate, by reducing impulsivity in the FCN avoidance, induced effects opposite to those observed in an appetitive FCN procedure. These results suggest that the therapeutic actions of stimulants, to reduce impulsive behaviour in ADHD, may arise in part by increasing the control of behaviour by aversive stimuli.     

Individual differences in the priming effect of ethanol in social drinkers

OBJECTIVE: Alcohol-dependent individuals frequently report increased desire for alcohol and exhibit increased alcohol-seeking behaviors following a single drink. The phenomenon, known as priming, has been demonstrated in the laboratory in alcohol-dependent humans and in nonhumans, but the effect is inconsistently observed in nonproblem social drinkers. The current experiment examined this effect in healthy, nonproblem social drinkers across a range of preload doses. METHOD: Using a repeated-measures design, 12 social drinkers were given ethanol (0.2, 0.4 or 0.8 g/kg) or placebo preloads. Various subjective effects measures were obtained at regular intervals. In addition, before and after consuming, the preload subjects performed an operant task on which they made repeated choices for either ethanol or money. RESULTS: Ethanol dose-dependently increased subjective reports of drug liking and desire to take more ethanol. When data from all subjects were examined, ethanol did not affect choices for ethanol on the choice task. However, in subjects who reported the greatest positive mood effects from ethanol (0.8 g/kg), the ethanol preload increased choices for ethanol over money on the choice task. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide evidence for a priming effect of ethanol in social drinkers as measured by increased subjective desire for drug. The findings also suggest that the priming effects may be strongest in individuals who experience the greatest subjective positive mood effects from ethanol.     

Effect of lesions of the ascending 5-hydroxytryptaminergic pathways on choice between delayed reinforcers

The possible involvement of the ascending 5-hydroxytryptaminergic (5HTergic) pathways in determining the effectiveness of delayed positive reinforcers was investigated using Mazur's (1984) adjusting-delay paradigm. Fourteen rats received injections of 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine into the dorsal and median raphe nuclei; 12 rats received sham lesions. The rats made repeated choices in a two-lever operant conditioning chamber between a smaller reinforcer delivered after a 2-s delay and a larger reinforcer delivered after a variable delay, the length of which was determined by the subject's previous choices. When the two reinforcers consisted of one and two food pellets, the indifference point (the delay to the larger reinforcer that rendered the two reinforcers equally effective) was shorter in the lesioned group than in the control group. Increasing the sizes of the reinforcers to three and six pellets reduced the indifference point in both groups and abolished the between-group difference. The levels of 5HT and 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5HIAA) in the parietal cortex, hippocampus, amygdala, nucleus accumbens and hypothalamus were greatly reduced in the lesioned group, but the levels of noradrenaline and dopamine were not significantly affected. The results are consistent with the suggestion that the 5HTergic pathways play a role in maintaining the effectiveness of delayed reinforcers.     

Differential effects of psychomotor stimulants on attentional performance in rats: nicotine, amphetamine, caffeine and methylphenidate

Nicotine can improve attentional performance in the rat as assessed by a modified five-choice serial reaction time task (5-CSRTT), but it is not known if the effect is shared with other psychomotor stimulants. This study compared the effects of nicotine, amphetamine, caffeine and methylphenidate on performance in the 5-CSRTT and determined whether presenting stimuli at unpredictable times by using variable inter-trial intervals (ITI) influenced the sensitivity of the task to the drugs. One group of male hooded rats was trained to obtain food reinforcers by nose-poking in response to 1 s light stimuli presented randomly in one of five apertures, with fixed ITI; for a second group of rats, ITI varied randomly (n=12 per group). As observed previously, nicotine (tested in doses of 0.05-0.2 mg/kg) produced dose-related improvements in accuracy, reduced omission errors and response latencies, but increased anticipatory responding. Amphetamine (0.1-0.8 mg/kg) and methylphenidate (2.5-10 mg/kg) increased accuracy and reduced response latency, and decreased anticipatory responding. Caffeine (2.5-20 mg/kg) did not improve performance except at a small dose that decreased omission errors only. Training at different levels of stimulus predictability influenced performance in the undrugged state but had little impact on profiles of responses to the drugs. The findings with methylphenidate support the potential value of the 5-CSRTT for testing drugs that may be useful in the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.     

Effects of selective dopaminergic compounds on a delay-discounting task

Impulsivity is widely regarded as a multidimensional trait that encompasses two or more distinct patterns of behavior, and dopaminergic systems are implicated in the expression of impulsive behavior in both humans and animal subjects. Impulsive choice, or the tendency to choose rewards associated with relatively little or no delay, has been extensively studied in humans and animal subjects using delay-discounting tasks. Here, delay-discounting procedures were used to assess the effects of receptor-selective dopaminergic agonists, antagonists, and dopamine transporter ligands on choices of immediate versus delayed sucrose pellets. The effects of d-amphetamine, GBR 12909, apomorphine, SKF 81297, sumanirole, pramipexole, ABT-724, SCH 23390, L-741,626, PG01037, and L-745,870 were assessed in 24 Sprague-Dawley rats. The only drugs to affect impulsive choice selectively without altering undelayed choice were the D1-like antagonist, SCH 23390 (0.01 mg/kg), and the D4 partial agonist, ABT-724 (3.2 mg/kg), which both increased impulsive choice. The shared effects of these compounds may be explained by their localization within the prefrontal cortex on different groups of neurons. None of the selective agonists and antagonists tested reduced impulsive choice, so further research is needed to determine if direct dopaminergic agonists or antagonists may be therapeutically useful in the treatment of impulse-control disorders.     

Methylphenidate reduces impulsive behaviour in juvenile Wistar rats, but not in adult Wistar, SHR and WKY rats

Rationale Impulsivity is a core symptom of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) is a strain commonly used as an animal model of ADHD. However, there is no clear evidence that psychostimulants, which are used for treatment of ADHD, reduce impulsivity in SHR. Because ADHD mainly affects children, it may be relevant to study psychostimulants on juvenile animals. Objectives Using tolerance to delay of reward as index of impulsivity, the effects of methylphenidate were assessed in adult SHR, Wistar Kyoto (WKY) and Wistar rats and in juvenile Wistar rats. Materials and methods Animals were trained in a T-maze to choose between a small-but-immediate and a large-but-delayed reward. Adult SHR, WKY and Wistar rats were compared for their ability to tolerate a 15-s delay. The effect of methylphenidate on the tolerance to a 30-s delay was studied in adult rats of the three strains and in juvenile (4.5 to 6.5-week-old) Wistar rats. Results In adult rats, the waiting ability was lower in SHR than in control strains. Waiting ability was improved by methylphenidate (3 and 5 mg/kg) in juveniles, but not by methylphenidate (3 mg/kg) in adults. Conclusions These data support the idea that SHR are more impulsive than control strains. However, at the dose studied, methylphenidate fails to improve tolerance to delay in adult rats whatever the strain used. The reduction of impulsivity induced by methylphenidate in juvenile Wistar rats indicates that juvenile animals may be suitable for testing the therapeutic potential of drugs intended to the treatment of ADHD in children.     

Effects of acute and chronic methylphenidate on delay discounting

Methylphenidate (MPH) is one of the most common therapeutics used for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), which consists of symptoms of inattention, and/or impulsivity and hyperactivity. Acute administration of MPH has been found to decrease impulsive choice in both humans and nonhuman animals, however, little is known about potential long-term changes in impulsive choice due to chronic administration of MPH. In the present experiment, effects of acute and chronic MPH (1.0-10.0 mg/kg) were assessed on impulsive choice in the adult male Spontaneously Hypertensive Rat (SHR) to determine the extent of behavioral changes after chronic MPH exposure. Subjects chose between an immediate single food pellet and three food pellets delivered after a delay that increased within session (0 to 16 s). At relatively higher doses during acute and chronic administration, choice maintained by the larger reinforcer was disrupted when there was no delay to either outcome, suggesting that MPH may be affecting stimulus control under the current delay-discounting task. When this disruption was not observed, however, MPH effects were selective in that only one intermediate dose (3.0 mg/kg) decreased mean impulsive choice at one delay (8 s) following acute administration. The same effect was observed following chronic MPH administration except that the dose was higher (5.6 mg/kg) and the delay was shorter (4 s). Chronic administration of MPH did not show any negative indicators (e.g., an increase in impulsive choice) when administration was discontinued.     

Effects of amphetamine and methylphenidate on delay discounting in rats: interactions with order of delay presentation

Rationale

Drug effects on delay discounting are thought to reflect changes in sensitivity to reinforcer delay, although other behavioral mechanisms might be involved. One strategy for revealing the influence of different behavioral mechanisms is to alter features of the procedures in which they are studied.

Objective

This experiment examined whether the order of delay presentation under within-session delay discounting procedures impacts drug effects on discounting.

Methods

Rats responded under a discrete-trial choice procedure in which responses on one lever delivered one food pellet immediately and responses on the other lever delivered three food pellets either immediately or after a delay. The delay to the larger reinforcer (0, 4, 8, 16, and 32 s) was varied within session and the order of delay presentation (ascending or descending) varied between groups.

Results

Amphetamine (0.1–1.78 mg/kg) and methylphenidate (1.0–17.8 mg/kg) shifted delay functions upward in the ascending group (increasing choice of the larger reinforcer) and downward in the descending group (decreasing choice of the larger reinforcer). Morphine (1.0–10.0 mg/kg) and delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (0.32–5.6 mg/kg) tended to shift the delay functions downward, regardless of order of delay presentation, thereby reducing choice of the larger reinforcer, even when both reinforcers were delivered immediately.

Conclusion

The effects of amphetamine and methylphenidate under delay discounting procedures differed depending on the order of delay presentation, indicating that drug-induced changes in discounting were due, in part, to mechanisms other than altered sensitivity to reinforcer delay. Instead, amphetamine and methylphenidate altered responding in a manner consistent with increased behavioral perseveration.     

Blockade of sensitization to methylphenidate by MK-801: partial dissociation from motor effects

The role of MK-801's locomotor effect in blocking the development of sensitization to methylphenidate was investigated utilizing a computerized locomotor activity monitoring system. After 7 days of acclimation to a 12:12 light-dark cycle (lights on at 07:00), male Sprague-Dawley rats (n=62) were housed in test cages and motor activity was recorded continuously for 16 days. The first 2 days of recording served as a baseline for each rat, and on day 3 each rat received a saline injection. On days 4 to 9 rats were randomly divided into seven groups: Rats received either six daily s.c. injections of methylphenidate (2.5 mg/kg; Group 1), or six daily i.p. injections of 0.30 mg/kg, 0.05 mg/kg MK-801 (Groups 2 and 3, respectively); two MK-801 pre-treatment groups received a single i.p. injection of 0.05, or 0.30 mg/kg MK-801 one hour prior to 2.5 mg/kg methylphenidate (n=8 each) on day 4 followed by five daily injections of 2.5 mg/kg methylphenidate; and finally, two cotreatment groups received a challenge dose of 2.5 mg/kg methylphenidate on day 4 followed by either 0.05 or 0.30 mg/kg MK-801 i.p. one hour prior to 2.5 mg/kg methylphenidate from days 5 to 9. All groups were allowed five days of no treatment before being re-challenged on day 15 with the same treatment they received on day 4. Methylphenidate and 0.30 mg/kg MK-801 sensitized to their own locomotor effects, but 0.05 mg/kg MK-801, which had no acute motor effects, did not. The administration of MK-801 (0.30 mg/kg) prior to methylphenidate either singly on day 4, or coadministered throughout the repeated methylphenidate treatment phase, blocked the development of sensitization to methylphenidate. However, MK-801 at 0.05 mg/kg delayed the development of sensitization when co-administered on days 5 to 9, but a single injection 1 h prior to methylphenidate on day 4 did not prevent sensitization to subsequent methylphenidate administration. In conclusion, MK-801 prevents sensitization to methylphenidate; motor stimulation by MK-801 is not necessary for short-term prevention or delay of sensitization to methylphenidate but may be necessary for a persistent blockade of sensitization.     

Impulsive action induced by amphetamine, cocaine and MK801 is reduced by 5-HT(2C) receptor stimulation and 5-HT(2A) receptor blockade

Previous work has shown that 5-HT_2C receptor agonists and 5-HT_2A receptor antagonists reduce impulsive action, as well as the locomotor stimulant effect of psychomotor stimulants. Since psychomotor stimulants also increase impulsive action we examined the effects of the 5-HT_2C receptor agonist Ro60-0175, and the 5-HT_2A receptor antagonist M100907 on impulsive action induced by amphetamine, cocaine and the NMDA receptor antagonist MK801 (dizocilpine). Impulsive action was measured in adult male Long-Evans rats as premature responding in the 5-choice serial reaction time (5-CSRT) test. Initially, we determined that amphetamine (0.3 mg/kg), cocaine (15 mg/kg) and MK801 (0.03 mg/kg) induced comparable premature response rates of approximately 50-70 per session, compared to 10-15 responses under baseline conditions. Each drug and its vehicle were then tested in combination with Ro60-0175 (0.1 and 0.6 mg/kg) or its vehicle, or M100907 (0.5 mg/kg) or its vehicle. At 0.1 mg/kg Ro60-0175 did not modify the effects of amphetamine, cocaine or MK801. In contrast, the 0.6 mg/kg dose reduced premature responses induced by amphetamine, cocaine and MK801. M100907 also reduced premature responding induced by all three of these drugs. In general, treatment with Ro60-0175 or M100907 by itself did not consistently alter any of the other aspects of task performance in the 5-CSRT test including number of trials completed, and accuracy of responding. These data show that activation of 5-HT_2C receptors and blockade of 5-HT_2A receptors have seemingly similar functional effects on a measure of impulsive action.     

Effects of lesions of the orbitofrontal cortex on sensitivity to delayed and probabilistic reinforcement

RATIONALE: Lesions of the orbital prefrontal cortex (OPFC) can cause pathologically impulsive behaviour in humans. Inter-temporal choice behaviour (choice between reinforcers differing in size, delay and/or probability) has been proposed as a model of "impulsive choice" in animals. OBJECTIVE: The effect of lesions of the OPFC on rats' inter-temporal choice behaviour was examined in two experiments: (1) rats chose between a smaller immediate reinforcer and a larger delayed reinforcer; (2) rats chose between a smaller certain reinforcer and a larger probabilistic reinforcer. METHODS: Under halothane anaesthesia, rats received injections of the excitotoxin quinolinate into the OPFC (0.1 M, 0.5 microl, two injections in each hemisphere), or sham lesions (injections of vehicle). They were trained to press two levers (A and B) for food-pellet reinforcers in discrete-trials schedules. In free-choice trials, a press on A resulted in immediate delivery of one food pellet; a press on B resulted in delivery of two pellets, either following a delay ( d) (experiment 1), or with a probability ( p) <1 (experiment 2). The values of d and p were manipulated across phases of the experiments. The locations of the lesions were verified histologically at the end of the experiment. RESULTS: In experiment 1, both groups showed declining choice of lever B as a function of d. The lesioned rats showed significantly shorter indifference delays ( D50: the value of d corresponding to 50% choice of lever B) than the sham-lesioned rats. In experiment 2, both groups showed declining choice of lever B as a function of the odds against delivery of the two-pellet reinforcer, theta ( theta =[1/ p]-1). The lesioned rats showed lower indifference odds ( theta50: the value of theta corresponding to 50% choice of lever B) than the sham-lesioned rats. In both experiments, the lesioned rats showed extensive atrophy of the OPFC, with sparing of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that lesions of the OPFC can promote preference for the smaller and more immediate, and the smaller and more certain of two reinforcers. The results are consistent with two interpretations: the lesion may have altered (i) the rates of delay and odds discounting, and/or (ii) sensitivity to the ratio of the sizes of the two reinforcers.     

Effects of quinolinic acid-induced lesions of the orbital prefrontal cortex on inter-temporal choice: a quantitative analysis

Abstract Rationale. Lesions of the orbital prefrontal cortex (OPFC) can cause pathologically impulsive behaviour in humans. Inter-temporal choice behaviour (choice between reinforcers differing in size and delay) has been proposed as a model of "impulsive choice" in animals. Objective. A quantitative method was used to analyse inter-temporal choice in rats with lesions of the OPFC and sham-lesioned control rats. Methods. Under halothane anaesthesia, rats received injections of the excitotoxin quinolinate into the OPFC (0.1 M, 0.5 μl; two injections in each hemisphere), or sham lesions (injections of the vehicle). They were trained to press two levers (A and B) for sucrose reinforcement (0.6 M) in discrete-trials schedules. In free-choice trials, a press on A resulted in delivery of 50 μl of the sucrose solution after a delay d _A ; a press on B resulted in delivery of 100 μl of the same solution after a delay d _B . d _B was increased progressively across successive blocks of six trials in each session, while d _A was manipulated systematically across phases of the experiment. The indifference delay, d _B(50) (value of d _B corresponding to 50% choice of B) was estimated for each rat in each phase. Linear functions of d _B(50) versus d _A were derived, and the parameters of the function compared between the groups. The locations of the lesions were verified histologically at the end of the experiment. Results. In both groups, d _B(50) increased linearly with d _A (r ²>0.98 in each case). The slope of the function was significantly steeper in the lesioned group than the sham-lesioned group, whereas the intercept did not differ significantly between the groups. The brains of the lesioned rats showed extensive atrophy/gliosis of the OPFC, with sparing of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Conclusions. The results indicate that lesions of the OPFC can alter inter-temporal choice, either promoting or suppressing "impulsive choice", depending upon the relative sizes and delays of the two choice alternatives. Theoretical analysis based on a quantitative model of inter-temporal choice indicates that the pattern of effect of the OPFC lesion is likely to reflect two actions: (i) an increase in the rate of time discounting; (ii) an increase in sensitivity to the ratio of the sizes of two reinforcers. Electronic Publication     

Monetary alternative reinforcers more effectively decrease intranasal cocaine choice than food alternative reinforcers

Cocaine dependence continues to be a significant public health concern. Contingency management, wherein alternative reinforcers are made available upon cocaine abstinence, has shown promise for decreasing cocaine use. Other research has modeled this effect and demonstrated that alternative reinforcers also reduce cocaine self-administration in the laboratory. Results from both clinical and laboratory studies suggest that the type and value of alternative reinforcers influences their ability to decrease drug choice. The purpose of the present experiment was to determine the effect of money or food alternative reinforcers, valued at $0.01, 0.25, 0.50 and 1.00, on intranasal cocaine (4 [placebo] and 30 mg) choice. Cocaine was chosen to a greater extent than placebo across alternative reinforcer types and values, but the monetary alternative reinforcer suppressed drug choice to a greater degree than the food reinforcer. These results are concordant with previous findings and suggest that money may be a more effective alternative reinforcer for decreasing cocaine use. Future research should determine the sensitivity of this model to specific behavioral aspects of contingency management and whether food could compete with drugs as reinforcers in humans under laboratory conditions.     

Fenfluramine effects on impulsivity in a sample of adults with and without history of conduct disorder

RATIONALE: The role of serotonin in impulsivity was examined by administering the serotonin-releasing drug, d,l-fenfluramine, and measuring effects on impulsive responding of male subjects with and without a history of conduct disorder (CD) under controlled laboratory conditions. METHODS: Five adult male subjects with a history of CD and five matched controls were recruited into a study to determine the acute effects of d,l-fenfluramine on a laboratory measure of impulsive behavior. This laboratory measure, based upon delay of gratification, presented subjects with choices between a small reward after a short delay and a larger reward after a longer delay. Impulsive behavior was indicated by frequent choices for the smaller reward. RESULTS: Acute oral doses of d,l-fenfluramine (0.21, 0.42, and 0.85 mg/kg) produced decreases in the number of impulsive choices in all subjects with a history of CD, but had no effect on the control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: This data suggests that a deficit in serotonin and/or dopamine may play a role in impulsivity in CD subjects, and drugs which act to reduce this biological deficit can reduce impulsiveness.     

Effects of lithium chloride on induction and expression of methylphenidate sensitization

Repeated administration of psychomotor stimulants produces an enduring and progressively enhanced behavioral response known as behavioral sensitization, which has been implicated as a model for psychiatric disorders such as mania, schizophrenia, and drug addiction. The objective of the study was to determine whether lithium chloride (LiCl), an anti-manic agent, is effective in blocking the development and/or the expression of behavioral sensitization to methylphenidate. Male Sprague-Dawley rats (n=64) weighing 170-190 g were randomly divided into seven treatment groups. A computerized animal activity monitor system continuously recorded locomotor activity for 16 days. Effects of LiCl on induction of methylphenidate sensitization were studied by giving LiCl before or during six daily methylphenidate administrations. Effects of LiCl on the expression of methylphenidate sensitization were studied by injecting LiCl after sensitization to methylphenidate was induced. It was shown that LiCl treatment modulated the acute methylphenidate effects by transiently attenuating the locomotor response to methylphenidate during the six daily methylphenidate administrations but neither single nor multiple treatments with LiCl blocked the development or the expression of behavioral sensitization.     

Beyond discounting: possible experimental models of impulse control

Animal studies of impulsivity have typically used one of three models: a delay of reward procedure, a differential reinforcement for low rate responding (DRL) procedure, or an autoshaping procedure. In each of these paradigms, we argue, measurement of impulsivity is implicitly or explicitly equated with the effect delay has on the value of reward. The steepness by which delay diminishes value (the temporal discount function) is treated as an index of impulsivity. In order to provide a better analog of human impulsivity, this model needs to be expanded to include the converse of impulsivity – self-control. Through mechanisms such as committing to long range interests before the onset of temptation, or through bundling individual choices into classes of choices that are made at once, human decision-making can often look far less myopic than single trial experiments predict. For people, impulsive behavior may be more often the result of the breakdown of self-control mechanisms than of steep discount functions. Existing animal models of self-control are discussed, and future directions are suggested for psychopharmacological research. Received: 17 March 1999 / Final version: 6 June 1999