高频超声引导下Mammotome旋切系统在乳腺微小钙化灶切取活检中的价值

目的探讨高频超声引导下Mammotome微创旋切系统在乳腺微小钙化灶切取活检中的临床价值。方法在高频超声引导下应用Mammotome系统对24例乳腺微小钙化灶施行微创旋切术，钙化灶切除后病理检查。结果24例病灶均被准确定位切取。24例乳腺钙化灶病理：乳腺癌3例（12．5％），其中导管原位癌2例，浸润性导管癌1例；乳腺良性病变21例（87．5％），其中囊性小叶增生9例，乳腺导管增生及扩张6例，硬化乳腺病5例，导管内乳头状瘤1例。结论高频超声引导下Mammotome微创旋切系统诊断乳腺疾病安全可靠，微创，是诊断乳腺疾病的有效方法。     

Benign Papilloma on Core Biopsy Requires Surgical Excision

Background  When a papillary lesion is identified on core biopsy of an impalpable breast lesion, standard practice involves excisional biopsy. Recent literature has questioned the need for surgical excision in patients with benign core biopsy and radiological concordance. Our aim was to assess whether surgical excision is required by targeting this concordant group in a large screen-detected population. Methods  A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database of all benign papillary core biopsies between February 1995 and September 2007 at North Western Breast Screen and Monash Breast Screen in Melbourne, Australia was performed. All patients had surgical excision, enabling correlation between core and final excisional biopsy results on all lesions. All histology reports were reviewed and the radiology was reassessed. Results  During a 14-year period, 5783 core biopsies were performed from 633,163 screening mammograms. Eighty patients (0.01%) had benign papilloma on core biopsy, no patients had atypia on core biopsy, and all patients had benign radiological features. Of the 80 patients, 15 patients were found to have ductal carcinoma in situ (8) or invasive ductal carcinoma (7) on final pathology, yielding a 19% malignant rate. Conclusion  Core biopsy showing benign papillary lesion, even where radiology is also suggestive of a benign process, cannot exclude malignancy, and therefore surgical excision is required.     

Percutaneous excisional biopsy of impalpable breast lesions under ultrasound visualization

Within the last ten years, the development of innovative minimally invasive breast biopsy technologies has made a significant impact on the diagnostic evaluation of impalpable breast lesions. The Mammotome minimally invasive biopsy system is a diagnostic tool used under stereotactic or ultrasound guidance. The minimally invasive biopsies for 143 impalpable breast lesions in 86 patients were performed using the B-ultrasound-guided 8-gauge vacuum-assisted Mammotome system at Jinan Military General Hospital. One hundred and forty-three breast lesions in 86 patients were excised completely using this method. The average biopsy procedure time was 17 min (range, 3–45 min). Clinically, suspicious lesions were satisfactorily confirmed by this system. One hundred and twenty-one lesions were diagnosed as fibroadenoma, nineteen lesions as breast adenosis, one lesion as invasive breast cancer, and two lesions as ductal carcinoma in situ. Skin ecchymosis was found in two patients. One hundred and thirty-two impalpable lesions were completely excised, as demonstrated by the follow-up ultrasound examination. The results suggest that the B-ultrasound-guided Mammotome system may be an efficient tool for the diagnosis and treatment of impalpable breast lesions.     

Diagnostic Utility of ABBI(R) (Advanced Breast Biopsy Instrumentation) for Nonpalpable Breast Lesions in Korea

Abstract: Introduction of mammography along with particular attention for the diagnosis and treatment of nonpalpable breast lesions has led to the development of nonresectional biopsies such as mammography-guided core needle biopsy, ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology, and localization and excisional biopsy. The Advanced Breast Biopsy Instrumentation (ABBI®) system, a recently developed device, has made it possible to remove a lesion completely under local anesthesia, thus providing a more reliable and rapid evaluation on an outpatient basis. We studied 159 patients with nonpalpable breast lesions from December 1996 to August 1998. Fifty-nine patients received core needle biopsies and 100 patients received excision with the ABBI system. The ABBI system patients had postexcisional mammography and specimen radiographs to confirm complete excision of the lesions. Pathologists examined permanent section specimens. In cases of malignancy, total mastectomy or reexcision was performed to secure a tumor-free margin. We collected malignant lesions in 23 of 159 patients, of whom 17 had ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Postoperative histopathologic reports showed DCIS in 11 and infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) in 2 among the 13 malignancies proven by stereotactic core biopsy. Among 10 malignancies proven by the ABBI system, there were 6 DCIS, 1 lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), and 3 IDC. In seven patients in whom mammography suggested malignancy but core biopsy showed benign lesion, localization and excisional biopsy confirmed DCIS in four of seven patients. The ABBI system is a more reliable and rapid method of evaluating breast lesions compared with stereotactic core biopsy. It is usually done under local anesthesia, minimizing the deformity of the breast. Therefore the ABBI system can be used as a preferred technique over conventional localization and excisional biopsy.     

Intraoperative ultrasound facilitates surgery for early breast cancer

Background Mammogram-directed wire localization for nonpalpable cancer requires surgeon’s time and coordination and some patient discomfort. Up to half of these nonpalpable lesions can be visualized by ultrasound. Use of intraoperative ultrasound streamlines the process of image-guided surgery. Methods We prospectively visualized 69 nonpalpable breast cancers between January 1998 and July 2001. Ultrasound localization was performed in the operating room immediately before definitive surgery. Breast cancers were localized using either blue dye or a guide wire. Results Ultrasound correctly localized all lesions at surgery. Negative margins for invasive carcinoma were found in 97% (67 of 69) of patients. Re-excisions were performed in only 6% (4 of 69) of patients. Overall negative margins were found in 90% (62 of 69) of patients. Most positive margins (71%) were due to the presence of noncalcified ductal carcinoma in situ. Mastectomy was necessary in 4% of patients, usually due to multifocal invasive carcinoma. Conclusions Increased familiarity with ultrasound has allowed the surgeon to localize breast cancer in the operating room, improving the process of image-guided surgery. Ultrasound localization is accurate, time efficient, technically feasible, and easier for the patient. The re-excision rate is very low and is similar to that for mammographic localization. Intraoperative ultrasound localization should be considered whenever a breast cancer needs image-guided excision.     

Mucocele‐like lesions diagnosed on breast core biopsy: Low risk of upgrade and subsequent carcinoma

Mucocele‐like lesions of the breast diagnosed on core biopsy are usually excised to exclude the possibility of partial sampling of an invasive mucinous carcinoma. The goal of this study was to correlate the pathologic and radiologic features of mucocele‐like lesions to determine if excision is mandatory. Over a 16 year period we identified 32 patients with mucocele‐like lesions diagnosed on 27 (84%) stereotactic and 5 (16%) ultrasound‐guided core biopsies. The indications for core biopsy were: calcifications in 24 (75%), a mass in 7 (22%), and a mass with calcifications in 1 (3%). There were 22 (69%) mucocele‐like lesions without atypia and 10 (31%) with atypical ductal hyperplasia or detached groups of atypical cells. Of the 22 mucocele‐like lesions without atypia, 19 (86%) were excised: 15/19 (79%) were benign, 3/19 (16%) had atypical ductal hyperplasia and 1/19 (5%) had ductal carcinoma in situ. None of the patients with mucocele‐like lesions without atypia were upgraded to invasive carcinoma. The single patient who was upgraded to low‐grade ductal carcinoma in situ had a history of ductal carcinoma in situ in the same breast. Of the 10 patients with mucocele‐like lesions with atypia, 9 (90%) were excised: 5/9 (56%) were benign, 1/9 (11%) had atypical ductal hyperplasia and 3/9 (33%) had invasive carcinoma. Of the patients with mucocele‐like lesions with atypia who were upgraded to invasive carcinoma, one had a BIRADS 5 mass and discordant pathology and one had a history of Hodgkin lymphoma and mantle radiation. There were 24 patients with mucocele‐like lesions with or without atypia who were not upgraded on excision, and none developed breast cancer after a median of 51 months (range 7‐192). These findings indicate that mucocele‐like lesions without atypia are unlikely to be upgraded on excision and are associated with a low risk for the subsequent development of carcinoma.     

Vacuum-assisted stereotactic breast biopsy: histologic underestimation of malignant lesions

HYPOTHESIS: The histopathologic correlation between stereotactic core needle biopsy and subsequent surgical excision of mammographically detected nonpalpable breast abnormalities is improved with a larger-core (11-gauge) device. DESIGN: Retrospective medical record and histopathologic review. SETTING: University-based academic practice setting. PATIENTS: Two hundred one patients who underwent surgical excision of mammographic abnormalities that had undergone biopsy with an 11-gauge vacuum-assisted stereotactic core biopsy device. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Correlation between stereotactic biopsy histologic results and the histologic results of subsequent surgical specimens. RESULTS: Results of stereotactic biopsy performed on 851 patients revealed atypical hyperplasia in 46 lesions, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in 89 lesions, and invasive cancer in 73 mammographic abnormalities. Subsequent surgical excision of the 46 atypical lesions revealed 2 cases of DCIS (4.3%) and 4 cases of invasive carcinoma (8.7%). Lesions diagnosed as DCIS on stereotactic biopsy proved to be invasive carcinoma in 10 (11.2%) of 89 patients on subsequent excision. Stereotactic biopsy completely removed 21 (23.6%) of 89 DCIS lesions and 20 (27.4%) of 73 invasive carcinomas. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, 11-gauge vacuum-assisted core breast biopsy accurately predicts the degree of disease in the majority of malignant lesions; however, understaging still occurs in 11% to 13% of lesions showing atypical hyperplasia or DCIS.     

Margins and outcome of screen-detected breast cancer with extensive in situ component

BACKGROUND: In situ disease surrounding invasive tumours is an important consideration in the management of patients with early breast cancer. This study of screen-detected breast cancers assessed the influence of in situ disease including an extensive in situ component (defined as ductal carcinoma in situ involving more than 25% of the area within the invasive tumour) on surgical management, local recurrence and survival of a group of patients. METHODS: A total of 595 cases of invasive breast cancer detected at St Vincent's BreastScreen were retrospectively reviewed to determine presence and extent of in situ disease, the surgical procedure and adequacy of excision. Outcome was examined in a cohort of 126 cases. RESULTS: A total of 438 (74%) patients had in situ foci in or around the invasive tumour and 107 (18%) were defined as extensive in situ component (EIC)-positive. The initial procedure was mastectomy in 20% of the cases and breast-conserving surgery in 80% including 18% who underwent further surgery. Re-excision (P = 0.02) or mastectomy (P = 0.01) was more often required in patients with EIC. After definitive local excision, margins were close or involved with invasive disease in 3% but the patients with EIC were more likely to have margins close or involved with in situ disease (16 vs 2%; P = 0.001). There were seven deaths and one local invasive recurrence in the follow-up group and none of the deaths were in patients who were EIC-positive. CONCLUSIONS: EIC predicts for a higher rate of re-excision and/or mastectomy. For patients with EIC, there is an acceptably low risk of local recurrence if margins are clear.     

Impact of core-needle breast biopsy on the surgical management of mammographic abnormalities

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of percutaneous, image-guided core-needle breast biopsy (CNBx) and to compare the surgical management of patients with breast cancer diagnosed by CNBx with patients diagnosed by surgical needle-localization biopsy (SNLBx). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Percutaneous, image-guided CNBx is a less invasive alternative to SNLBx for the diagnosis of nonpalpable mammographic abnormalities. CNBx potentially spares patients with benign lesions from unnecessary surgery, although false-negative results can occur. For patients with malignant lesions, preoperative diagnosis by CNBx allows definitive treatment decisions to be made before surgery and may affect surgical outcomes. METHODS: Between 1992 and 1999, 939 patients with 1,042 mammographically detected lesions underwent biopsy by stereotactic CNBx or ultrasound-guided CNBx. Results were categorized pathologically as benign or malignant and, further, as invasive or noninvasive malignancies. Only biopsy results confirmed by excision or 1-year-minimum mammographic follow-up were included in the analysis. Patients with breast cancer diagnosed by CNBx were compared with a matched control group of patients with breast cancer diagnosed by SNLBx. RESULTS: Benign results were obtained in 802 lesions (77%), 520 of which were in patients with adequate follow-up. Ninety-five of the 520 evaluable lesions (18%) were subsequently excised because of atypical hyperplasia, mammographic-histologic discordance, or other clinical indications. There were 17 false-negative CNBx results in this group; 15 of these lesions were correctly diagnosed by excisional biopsy within 4 months of CNBx. In two patients (0.9%), delayed diagnoses of ductal carcinoma in situ were made at 15 and 19 months after CNBx. Malignant results were obtained in 240 lesions (23%), 220 of which were surgically excised from 202 patients at our institution. Two lesions diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ were reclassified as atypical ductal hyperplasia and considered false-positive results (0.4%). For malignant lesions, the sensitivity and specificity of CNBx for the detection of invasion were 89% and 96%, respectively. During the first surgical procedure, 115 of 199 patients (58%) diagnosed by CNBx underwent local excision; 194 of 199 patients (97%) evaluated by SNLBx underwent local excision. For patients whose initial surgery was local excision, those diagnosed before surgery by CNBx had larger excision specimens and were more likely to have negative surgical margins than were patients initially evaluated by SNLBx. Overall, patients diagnosed by CNBx required fewer surgical procedures for definitive treatment than did patients diagnosed by SNLBx. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis by CNBx spares most patients with benign mammographic abnormalities from unnecessary surgery. With the selective use of SNLBx to confirm discordant results, missed diagnoses are rare. When compared with SNLBx, preoperative diagnosis of breast cancer by CNBx facilitates wider initial margins of excision, fewer positive margins, and fewer surgical procedures to accomplish definitive treatment than diagnosis by SNLBx.     

Do breast columnar cell lesions with atypia need to be excised?

Columnar cell lesion with atypia (CCLA) is a newly recognized pathologic entity seen in breast specimens. The breast cancer risk associated with this finding is unclear, although CCLA had been found adjacent to both in situ and invasive carcinomas, but the incidence is unknown. Breast specimens from patients with a columnar cell lesion were reviewed by a pathologist for atypia. Twenty-one specimens with CCLA were identified [core biopsy (8), excisional biopsy (11), and simple mastectomy (2)]. Six of eight specimens with CCLA on core had adjacent abnormal pathology: infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC)/lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) (1), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)/LCIS (1), DCIS (1), LCIS (1), and papillomatosis (2). Five of 11 specimens with CCLA on excisional biopsy had adjacent abnormal pathology: IDC (3), DCIS/LCIS (1), and atypical ductal hyperplasia/papilloma (1). Two of two simple mastectomy specimens had CCLA associated with IDC (1) and DCIS (1). Overall, abnormal pathology was found adjacent to CCLA in 62 per cent of specimens (13/21). Breast pathologic specimens containing a columnar cell lesion should be carefully examined for atypia. Surgical excision is warranted for CCLA found on core biopsy. The future risk of breast cancer based on the finding of CCLA alone requires further investigation.     

Radial scars diagnosed on breast core biopsy: Frequency of atypia and carcinoma on excision and implications for management

AimsThe risk of finding carcinoma in excisions following a core needle biopsy diagnosis of radial scar is not well defined and clinical management is variable.The aim of this study is to determine the frequency of high-risk lesions, ductal carcinoma in situ, and invasive carcinoma in excisions following a core biopsy diagnosis of radial scar.Methods and resultsDedicated breast pathologists and radiologists correlated the histologic and radiologic findings and categorized radial scars as the target lesion or an incidental finding. High-risk lesions were defined as atypical hyperplasia or classical lobular carcinoma in situ.Of the 79 radial scars identified over a 14-year period, 22 were associated with atypia or carcinoma in the core biopsy. Thirty-seven (37) of the 57 benign radial scars underwent excision with benign findings in 30 (81%), high-risk lesions in six (16%), and flat epithelial atypia in one (3%). There were no upgrades to carcinoma. One patient with a benign radial scar developed a 3-mm focus of intermediate-grade estrogen receptor-positive ductal carcinoma in situ in the same quadrant of the ipsilateral breast 72 months after excision. One patient with an incidental un-excised benign radial scar was diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ at a separate site of suspicious calcifications.ConclusionsIn this series, none of the benign radial scars was upgraded to carcinoma. Radial scar was the targeted lesion in all cases with high-risk lesions on excision. Surgical excision may not be mandatory for patients with benign incidental radial scars on core biopsy.     

Natural history of in situ breast cancer in a defined population.

The entire experience of in situ breast cancer in Alberta from 1953 to 1984 was examined. Of 243 patients coded, 226 were available for review by a panel of three pathologists. In 149 cases the diagnosis of in situ disease was confirmed. One hundred and eight patients had 109 ductal carcinomas in situ, 38 patients had lobular carcinomas in situ, with 3 patients having both. A multitude of treatments was used, ranging from local excision to radical mastectomy. Survival at a mean of 6 years follow-up was equal in all groups, with only two patients with a confirmed diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ dying from clinically suspected systemic disease. In patients treated by local excision, ipsilateral cancers were seen in 12% of ductal carcinoma in situ patients who had local excision and 13% of patients with lobular carcinoma in situ. Contralateral metachronous invasive cancers were seen in 6% of ductal carcinoma in situ patients and 3% of lobular carcinoma in situ patients. No lymph node involvement was seen in any of these patients, either with prophylactic dissection or in follow-up. The conclusion reached was that both in situ lesions are similar in their clinical course. Lymph node dissection is not necessary. Pathologic review is critical for accurate studies, with a change in diagnosis of 36% of diagnoses. Treatment does not appear to affect prognosis. The most appropriate treatment needs to be determined in prospective randomized trials.     

Factors associated with upgrading to malignancy at surgery of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed on core biopsy

Previous studies have shown that 4-54% of breast lesions reported on core biopsies as atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) are upgraded on further excision to ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or invasive carcinoma. We evaluated the rate of upgrading ADH to carcinoma at surgery for ADH diagnosed by percutaneous biopsy, and examined characteristics associated with malignancy. We identified 13,488 consecutive biopsies conducted at one center over a nine-year period. A total of 422 biopsies with ADH in 415 patients were included. DCIS or invasive carcinoma was found in 132 cases (31.3% upgrading). Multivariate model revealed that ipsilateral breast symptoms, mammographic lesion other than microcalcifications alone, 14G core needle biopsy, papilloma co-diagnosis, severe ADH and pathologists with lower volume of ADH diagnosis were factors statistically associated with malignancy. However, no subgroups were identified for safe clinical-only follow-up. Surgery is recommended in all cases of ADH diagnosed by percutaneous breast biopsy.     

Assessment of 142 stellate lesions with imaging features suggestive of radial scar discovered during population-based screening for breast cancer

Because some lesions diagnosed as radial scars (RS) on core biopsy have been found to be malignant on excision, core biopsy has not had an established role in the assessment of RS. In our breast cancer-screening program, we have avoided core biopsy if RS is suspected on imaging. Recently, two reports have expanded the experience with core biopsy of RS, prompting this review of our assessment protocols for lesions suspected as being RS. Between January 1996 and January 2003, stellate lesions with imaging features of RS in which core biopsy was omitted because of a presumptive radiologic diagnosis of RS are included. Demographic, radiologic, and cytologic data were correlated with the histologic findings in the excised specimen. On imaging, 9% (142) of all stellate lesions were suspected to be RS. Only 66.2% (94) were confirmed as RS on histology; 38 cases (28.6%) were carcinomas (36 invasive, 2 in situ) and 7% showed benign fibrocystic changes; 87.1% of the carcinomas required further surgery for positive margins. Axillary staging was also needed for the invasive cancers. Among the histologically proven RS, 28 of 94 (29.8%) showed areas of atypical ductal hyperplasia, lobular neoplasia, ductal carcinoma in situ, or invasive carcinoma. These proliferations were typically focal and unpredictable and were usually completely excised by the initial diagnostic biopsy. Core biopsy would be valuable in the assessment of lesions with imaging features suggestive of RS since 28.6% of such lesions are indeed carcinomas that mimic RS. Identification of these cancers would permit one stage breast and axillary surgery to be planned. The policy of mammographic surveillance for lesions with nonmalignant core biopsies remains controversial because of the paucity of data. Ongoing evaluation is needed as more experience is reported.     

Fine-wire localization and biopsy of non-palpable breast lesions

We have undertaken fine-wire localization and biopsy of 130 impalpable breast lesions identified by mammography and considered suspicious of malignancy. Histologically 22 of these lesions were invasive carcinomas and 24 were in situ carcinomas (35 per cent malignant). Twenty-nine per cent of the lesions were identified during the screening of asymptomatic women. In the remainder, the presenting symptoms bore no relation to the eventual histological diagnosis. Clusters of microcalcification were more often malignant than were abnormal soft-tissue masses. Malignancy in the absence of microcalcification was almost always invasive.     

Role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in high-risk ductal carcinoma in situ patients

BACKGROUND: The role of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is poorly defined. However, up to 20% of patients with DCIS will have invasive carcinoma; these patients require staging for axillary metastasis. The aim of this study was to identify patients with a core biopsy diagnosis of DCIS who may benefit from SLNB. METHODS: In a prospective study, we performed SLNB on patients with a preoperative diagnosis of >2.5 cm of high-grade DCIS or DCIS when mastectomy was indicated. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients underwent surgery for high-grade DCIS, and 35 of these patients underwent SLNB. Postsurgical excision histology revealed invasive disease in 20 patients, 19 of whom had undergone SLNB. Before the adoption of SLNB in selected DCIS patients, all 20 with occult invasive disease would have required second surgery axillary staging (P < .01, chi-square test). CONCLUSIONS: SLNB should not be performed routinely for all patients with an initial diagnosis of DCIS. However, selective lymphadenectomy may be a useful clinical adjuvant in selected high-risk DCIS patients.     

The significance of surgical margins for patients with atypical ductal hyperplasia

BACKGROUND: The significance of surgical margins for patients with atypical ductal hyperplasia is unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed our experience with atypical ductal hyperplasia and correlated the margin status of the specimens removed with the risk of recurrence as atypical ductal hyperplasia, ductal carcinoma in situ, and invasive carcinoma. Seven hundred forty-seven patients were identified between February 1995 and September 2005 as having biopsy proven atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH). One hundred fifty-five of these patients were found to have "pure" atypical ductal hyperplasia without associated premalignant or malignant breast disease or a history of ipsilateral disease. Margin status of the initial excisional biopsy was noted and was correlated with the risk of recurrence. RESULTS: Of the 155 patients whose excisional biopsy specimens were "pure" atypical ductal hyperplasia, 44% (68) had negative margins, 5% (7) had positive margins, and 52% (80) were not reported. No patient underwent re-excision for close or positive margins. Follow-up ranged from 0 to 119 months, with a mean of 26 months. Seven patients (5%) presented with new findings at the site of their initial excisional biopsy, 1 of whom was found to have an invasive ductal carcinoma and 6 of whom had benign findings. Of the 87 patients with margins positive or unknown for ADH at surgical excision, none went on to develop malignancy. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that clear surgical margins at surgical excision for atypical ductal hyperplasia did not affect the risk of subsequently developing a malignancy.     

Benign breast papilloma: Is surgical excision necessary?

In many centers internationally, current standard of care is to excise all papillomas of the breast, despite recently reported low rates of upgrade to malignancy on final excision. The objective of this study was to determine the upgrade rate to malignancy in patients with papilloma without atypia. A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of all cases of benign intraductal papilloma in a tertiary referral symptomatic breast unit between July 2008 and July 2018 was performed. Patients with evidence of malignancy or atypia on core biopsy and those with a history of breast cancer or genetic mutations predisposing to breast cancer were excluded. One hundred and seventy‐three cases of benign papilloma diagnosed on core biopsy were identified. Following exclusions, the final cohort comprised of 138 patients. Mean age at presentation was 51. Mean follow‐up time was 9.6 months. The most common symptom was a lump (40%). Of the 124 patients who underwent excision, three had ductal carcinoma in situ and there were no cases of invasive disease, giving an upgrade rate to malignancy of 2.4%. Upgrade to other high‐risk lesions (atypical lobular and ductal hyperplasia and lobular carcinoma in situ) was demonstrated in 15 cases (12.1%). Benign papilloma was confirmed in 100 cases (81.5%), and 6 (4.8%) had no residual papilloma found on final excision. Twelve patients (8.7%) were managed conservatively. Of those, one later went on to develop malignancy. Patients with a diagnosis of benign papilloma without atypia on core biopsy have a low risk of upgrade to malignancy on final pathology, suggesting that observation may be a safe alternative to surgical excision. Further research is warranted to determine which patients can be safely managed conservatively.     

Invasive mammary carcinoma after immediate and short-term follow-up for lobular neoplasia on core biopsy

Lobular neoplasia (LN), including atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) and lobular carcinoma in situ, may be encountered in breast core biopsies performed for mammographic abnormalities even though LN is often not, in itself, responsible for the abnormal mammogram. The need for surgical excision following a diagnosis of LN on core biopsy is not well defined. We examined pathologic and mammographic findings in a consecutive series of cases diagnosed as LN to address this issue. Radiology/pathology records were reviewed for cases with a pathology diagnosis of pure LN during the period 1998-2001. Specifically excluded were cases with associated atypical ductal hyperplasia, ductal carcinoma in situ, invasive mammary carcinoma, or any history of breast malignancy. Thirty-five women 39-76 years of age (mean 52 years) were identified. Specimens were obtained as stereotactic core (31) or limited wire-guided biopsy (four). The diagnoses were lobular carcinoma in situ (12), lobular carcinoma in situ/ALH (10), and ALH (13). Fourteen patients did not undergo excisional biopsy and had no subsequent clinical follow-up to warrant additional biopsy (follow-up 6 months to 3 years). Five patients had no immediate excision, but eventually during clinical follow-up for LN (1 month to 3 years), two developed mammographic lesions in the ipsilateral (one patient) or contralateral breast (one patient) that led to diagnoses of invasive mammary carcinoma (lobular and composite ductal-lobular types, 10 and 8 mm, respectively); three patients had subsequent mammographic findings in the ipsilateral or contralateral breast leading to biopsies showing only LN (two patients) or no neoplastic pathology (one patient). The remaining 16 patients (all core biopsied) underwent immediate wire-guided excisions. Thirteen (81%) showed additional foci of LN, one (6.3%) with atypical ductal hyperplasia, and two (12.5%) with invasive lobular carcinoma (3 mm and <1 mm). Three (19%) had no residual disease; however, additional clinical follow-up in one of these patients revealed an invasive mammary carcinoma in the contralateral breast (false-negative mammography). Radiographic findings were calcifications and density/mass lesions in 27 and 8 cases, respectively. Of 27 cases presenting with Ca, 10 showed colocalization of LN and Ca. In the eight cases presenting with density/mass, incidental microscopic microcalcifications colocalized to LN were found in two cases. When present, histologic Ca was associated with LN in 12 of 29 cases studied (41%). Of the 21 patients with immediate or subsequent excision, five (24%) were found to have an associated invasive mammary carcinoma (two on immediate excision and three after short-term follow-up of up to 3 years). The bilaterality of cancer risk was expected; however, the number of invasive carcinomas was not. That the invasive carcinomas detected at follow-up were small implies that they might have been present (but occult) at initial presentation. We conclude that lobular carcinoma in situ detected on core biopsy is potentially a significant marker for concurrent and near-term breast pathology requiring complete intensive multidisciplinary clinical follow-up with specific individualization of patient care.     

Accuracy of 11-Gauge Vacuum-Assisted Core Biopsy of Mammographic Breast Lesions

Background: Image-guided percutaneous biopsy has largely replaced excisional biopsy of mammographic lesions. Vacuum-assisted core biopsy has improved sampling of such lesions. The objectives of this study were to define the accuracy of the vacuum-assisted 11-gauge stereotactic core biopsy in sampling of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and to define histologic and mammographic features of target lesions, which predict sampling errors.Methods: Between October 1996 and March 2000, 1341 patients underwent stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy. Patients with ADH or DCIS were encouraged to undergo excisional biopsy.Results: Surgical excision of 37 ADH lesions revealed 5 missed DCIS lesions and 1 missed invasive cancer. Twelve of 91 DCIS lesions were upstaged to invasive cancer upon excision. The underestimation rate was highest in patients with DCIS when the target lesion for biopsy was a zone of calcifications >1.5 cm. No correlation existed between the histologic features of DCIS lesions diagnosed by stereotactic biopsy and the presence of infiltrating disease on excision.Conclusions: Vacuum-assisted 11-gauge stereotactic core biopsy understages 13.2% and 13.5% of DCIS and ADH lesions, respectively. In patients with DCIS found by stereotactic biopsy, a target zone of calcifications >1.5 cm is associated with a higher underestimation rate of infiltrating disease.