Pancreas preservation with University of Wisconsin and Celsior solutions

BACKGROUND: Although the use of Celsior has been recently described for heart, lung, liver, and kidney transplantation, no data are available on its use for clinical pancreas preservation. METHODS: We herein describe the results of 112 pancreas transplants preserved with either University of Wisconsin (UW; (n = 56) or Celsior (n = 56) solution at two Italian transplant centers. The groups were comparable with regard to all donor and recipient characteristics. RESULTS: Mean cold and warm ischemia times were 10.1 +/- 2.2 hours and 37.2 +/- 8.2 minutes for UW compared to 10.8 +/- 2.4 hours and 38.3 +/- 6.7 minutes for Celsior (P = NS). Delayed endocrine pancreas function was recorded in two UW-preserved grafts (3.6%). Actuarial 1-year patient survival was 94.6% for UW as compared with 100% for Celsior (P = NS). Equivalent graft survival figures were 91.0% for UW as compared with 96.4% for Celsior (P = NS). CONCLUSIONS: Within the range of cold ischemia times reported in this study, UW and Celsior solutions have similar safety profiles for pancreas transplantation.     

Pancreas preservation with University of Wisconsin and Celsior solutions: a single-center, prospective, randomized pilot study

BACKGROUND: Celsior is an extracellular-type, low-viscosity, preservation solution already used for heart, lung, liver, and kidney transplantation. We report the results of a single-center, prospective, randomized pilot study specifically designed to compare the safety profile of Celsior solution with University of Wisconsin (UW) solution in clinical pancreas transplantation. METHODS: A total of 105 consecutive procurements were randomized to graft preservation with UW (n=53) solution or Celsior (n=52) solution. The groups were comparable with regard to all donor and recipient characteristics. RESULTS: Five grafts were discarded and 100 grafts (50 UW vs. 50 Celsior) were transplanted. Mean cold and warm ischemia times were 11.0 +/- 2.1 hr and 37.2 +/- 6.0 min for UW compared with 10.8 +/- 1.8 hr and 38.1 +/- 5.9 min for Celsior (P =not significant). Delayed endocrine pancreas function was recorded in one graft preserved with UW solution. Eleven recipients (UW 12% vs. Celsior 10%, P =not significant) required a relaparotomy. The mean serum levels of glucose, amylase, and lipase remained comparable between the study arms at equivalent intervals after transplantation. One recipient died with functioning grafts in each study arm; two further grafts were lost to arterial thrombosis (Celsior) and chronic rejection (UW), respectively. Actuarial 1-year patient and graft survival rates overlapped in the two study arms (98% and 96%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Within the range of cold ischemia time reported in this study, UW and Celsior solutions have similar safety profiles for pancreas preservation.     

Comparison of Celsior and University of Wisconsin solutions in cold preservation of liver from octogenarian donors

BACKGROUND: Celsior (CS) has recently been proposed as a cold storage solution for thoracic and abdominal organs. We compared University of Wisconsin (UW) and CS solutions for the preservation of livers from old donors, with regard to initial function as well as short- and long-term graft and patient survival. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study from 1998 to 2002 includes 30 livers from octogenarian donors preserved in CS (n = 15) or UW (n = 15) solution prior to transplantation. Donor and recipient clinical and laboratory parameters as well as liver biopsy results were evaluated in all cases. RESULTS: The distribution of the main donor variables as well as recipient characteristics were comparable between groups. Mean cold ischemia time was 421 minutes in the CS group and 474 minutes in the UW group. Mild steatosis was present in 8 cases in the CS group and 7 cases in the UW group. No primary graft dysfunction or arterial or biliary complications were noted. There was 1 acute rejection episode in the CS group and 4 in the UW group. Late postoperative deaths were observed only in the UW group (ie, 7 of 15). Actuarial graft survival was 100% in the CS group vs 86.7% in the UW group (P = NS) at 3 months, and 100% in the CS group vs 52.5% in the UW group (P =.007) at 12 months. Patient survival was 100% in the CS group vs 93.3% in the UW group (P = NS) at 3 months, and 100% in the CS group vs 59.3% in the UW group (P =.01) at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Both CS and UW solutions effectively protect livers obtained from donors >80 years of age during the early postoperative course but the CS group had better long-term results.     

Efficacy of renal preservation: comparative study of Celsior and University of Wisconsin solutions

OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the efficacy of Celsior and University of Wisconsin (UW) solutions on the perfusion and cold storage of renal grafts for human transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analyses of 313 kidney transplants were performed between 2002 and 2005; group A (n = 160), UW solution and group B (n = 153), Celsior solution were used in the preservation of the organs. The mean donor age was lower in group B (group A = 42.67 years vs group B = 38.96 years; P < .05), living donors were more frequent in the UW group (group A = 10% vs group B = 0.9%; P < .001). Multiorgan procurement procedures were more common in the Celsior group (group A = 75% vs group B = 81.7%; P < .001). Recipients with no associated comorbidities were more frequent in the UW group (group A = 50% vs group B = 36%; P < .001). Recipient mean age, cold ischemia time, and HLA matches were comparable. RESULTS: Delayed graft function (group A = 22.7% vs group B = 20.6%), acute rejections (group A = 21.4% vs group B = 18.4%), and serum creatinine at 6 months (group A = 1.75 vs group B = 1.67 mg/dL), 1 year (group A = 1.47 vs group B = 1.74 mg/dL), and 2 years (group A = 1.43 vs group B = 1.58 mg/dL) showed no differences (P = NS). Graft (group A = 82.23% vs group B = 84.11%) and patient (group A = 93% vs group B = 93.69%) survivals at 3 years were similar (P = NS). There were no differences in the causes of graft loss. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of UW and Celsior solutions is equivalent in the cold storage and renal preservation for transplantation.     

Kidney transplantation from elderly donors: a prospective randomized study comparing celsior and UW solutions

AIM: The aim of present study was to assess the effect of Celsior as compared with University of Wisconsin (UW) solution on immediate and long-term function of kidney transplants harvested from elderly donors. METHODS: A prospective multicenter randomized study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of Celsior versus UW solution for the clinical preservation of the kidney. Fifty renal transplants were performed from donors over 60 years old. Twenty-five kidneys were stored in Celsior and 25 in UW solution. The groups were comparable with regard to donor and recipient characteristics. Renal function outcomes were compared by evaluating delayed graft function rates, daily urinary output, as well as the evolution of mean serum creatinine at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 15 days. RESULTS: The warm ischemia time was 42.4 +/- 11 minutes among Celsior vs 46.9 +/- 17.9 minutes in the UW cohort (P = NS). The cold ischemia time was 18 +/- 4.5 hours in Celsior and 19 +/- 6.5 hours in UW (P = NS). Delayed graft function occurred in 48% of the Celsior group and in 52% of the UW group (P = NS). Mean serum creatinine levels and mean daily urinary output were also similar. One- and 5-year graft survivals of kidneys preserved with Celsior were 91.8% and 79.3% compared with 96% and 87.4% for UW without any significant statistical difference. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that the preservation of kidneys from elderly donors in Celsior solution is equivalent to that of UW solution.     

Influence of different preservation solutions and intentional hemodilution of recipient on viability of preserved and transplanted rat kidneys

Abstract. A total of 81 rat kidney grafts, flushed out and cold stored in either Sacks' or University of Wisconsin (UW) solution, were transplanted into hemodiluted (Hct = 30%± 4%) or untreated (Hct = 43%± 3%) recipients. The cold ischemia times (CIT) used were 24 and 36 h. One week after transplantation, the surviving recipients ( n = 67) were contralaterally nephrectomized. The experiment was terminated after a total period of 4 weeks, and the percentage of surviving animals was determined for each treatment. Data was pooled and the results show that grafts cold stored in UW solution were viable to a significantly greater extent and after longer CIT than grafts cold stored in Sacks' solution (47% vs 23%; P < 0. 05). Recipient hemodilution did not improve graft viability (39% vs 32%; NS). Kidneys cold stored for 24 h were viable to a greater extent than kidneys with a CIT of 36 h (50% vs 15%; P < 0. 01).     

Comparison of histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution and University of Wisconsin solution for organ preservation in clinical pancreas transplantation

BACKGROUND: University of Wisconsin (UW) solution is currently the standard preservation solution used for abdominal organ transplantation. This study assesses the efficacy of histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) compared with UW in pancreas transplantation. METHODS: Between October 2002 and August 2003, 20 pancreas transplants were performed. Patients were divided into two groups: UW (n=10) and HTK (n=10). Donor and recipient demographics were similar in both groups. The mean cold ischemia time for both groups was 11 +/-3 hr. RESULTS: There was an anticipated difference between total preservative volumes used (HTK: 4.5 +/- 1.2 L vs. UW: 3.4 +/-0.8 L; P =0.03). Patient and graft survivals to date were 100% in both groups. Serum fasting blood glucose, peak amylase, and serial amylase levels remained comparable at all intervals posttransplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Within this range of cold ischemia time, UW and HTK demonstrate similar efficacy in pancreas preservation.     

Pancreas transplantation from marginal donors

BACKGROUND: Marginal donor organs are a supplementary source of grafts that has not been fully exploited for pancreas transplantation (PTx). METHODS: A total of 100 PTx were performed with grafts procured from either 48 nonmarginal donors (NMD) or 52 marginal donors (MD), namely age greater than 45 years and/or severe hemodynamic instability at the time of procurement. PTx outcome was evaluated as the incidence of delayed endocrine pancreas function (DEPF), the complication rate, and the patient and graft survivals. RESULTS: The DEPF rate was 6.2% for NMD as compared to 0 for MD (P >.05). Relaparotomy rate was 12.5% for NMD and 9.6% for MD (P >.05). Actuarial 1-year graft survival was 91.7% and 94.2% for NMD and MD, respectively (P >.05). Equivalent figures for patients were 97.9% and 98.1%, respectively (P >.05). CONCLUSIONS: Pancreas from MD may be safely employed and significantly expand the donor pool for PTx.     

Comparison of histidine-tryptophan ketoglutarate and University of Wisconsin solutions as primary preservation in renal allografts undergoing pulsatile perfusion

INTRODUCTION: University of Wisconsin (UW) solution is the standard preservation solution for organ transplantation. Histidine-tryptophan ketogluatarate (HTK) solution has been used increasingly for kidney, pancreas, and liver transplantation. This study compared HTK and UW used during kidney procurement with subsequent pulsatile perfusion. METHODS: Between January and October 2003, 91 deceased renal and simultaneous kidney pancreas transplants were performed (UW, n = 41, and HTK, n = 50). There were no differences with regard to donor and recipient demographics or cold ischemia. RESULTS: Delayed graft function occurred in 3 (7%) of UW and 4 (8%) of HTK-preserved kidneys (P = NS). There were no significant differences between patient or graft survival. There was an anticipated difference between total preservative volumes used (HTK: 4.1 +/- 1.0 vs UW: 3.0 +/- 0.5; P < .005). CONCLUSION: UW and HTK appear to have similar efficacy in kidney preservation with pulsatile perfusion. HTK preservation solution can be used safely in conjunction with pulsatile preservation for cold storage of renal allografts.     

Improved survival of orthotopic liver allograft in swine by addition of trophic factors to University of Wisconsin solution

Serum-free preservation media such as University of Wisconsin (UW) may cause tissue damage through trophic factor (TF) deprivation. This study evaluated whether the addition of TFs to UW solution improves liver graft quality after extended cold preservation time in pigs. UW solution was supplemented with epidermal growth factor, insulin-like growth factor-1, nerve growth factor-beta, bactenecin, and substance P to create TF-supplemented (TFS) UW. Orthotopic liver transplantation was performed after 18 hr of static cold storage at 4 degrees C in UW (n=7) or TFS-UW (n=7) solution. Recipients of grafts preserved with TFS-UW demonstrated significantly better 5-day survival (57%) than those preserved with UW alone (14%) (P<0.05). Adenosine triphosphate content in grafts preserved in TFS-UW was significantly higher than in grafts preserved in UW (17.4+/-5.0 vs. 4.8+/-1.2 nmol/mg protein, respectively) (P<0.05). This study showed that the addition of TFs to UW solution allowed a significant extension of cold ischemic time in pigs.     

Clinical application of the two-layer (University of Wisconsin solution/perfluorochemical plus O2) method of pancreas preservation before transplantation

BACKGROUND: The two-layer method [University of Wisconson solution (UW)/perfluorochemical plus O2] for pancreas preservation has been demonstrated to be superior to simple UW storage alone in the canine model. For the first time, we applied the two-layer method to clinical whole-pancreas transplantation. METHODS: Pancreases were placed in the two-layer method in 10 cases and UW alone in 44 cases before transplant. The mean cold ischemic time was 16.5 hr in the two-layer group versus 18.1 hr in the UW group (P=NS). We compared the condition of graft at the time of reperfusion, and then 3 months posttransplant graft function and complications. RESULTS: At the time of reperfusion, no grafts in the two-layer group were edematous, compared with 10(23.3%) of 43 in the UW group (P=0.18). Seven (70%) of 10 grafts in the two-layer group obtained the best overall quality score, compared with 24(57.1%) of 42 in the UW group (P=0.72). Nine (90%) of 10 recipients in the two-layer group became insulin-independent during hospitalization, compared with 31(70.5%) of 44 in the UW group (P=0.26). Time to insulin independence was no different between the two groups. No pancreas grafts preserved by the two-layer method suffered acute rejection. Conclusions. The two-layer preservation method is feasible in human clinical transplantation. It was at least equivalent and may be superior to UW alone in both morphologic and functional assessment of the transplanted pancreas.     

Influence of different preservation solutions and intentional hemodilution of recipient on viability of preserved and transplanted rat kidneys

A total of 81 rat kidney grafts, flushed out and cold stored in either Sacks' or University of Wisconsin (UW) solution, were transplantated into hemodiluted (Hct=30%±4%) or untreated (Hct=43%±3%) recipients. The cold ischemia times (CIT) used were 24 and 36 h. One week after transplantation, the surviving recipients (n=67) were contralaterally nephrectomized. The experiment was terminated after a total period of 4 weeks, and the percentage of surviving animals were determined for each treatment. Data was pooled and the results show that grafts cold stored in UW solution were viable to a significantly greater extent and after longer CIT than grafts cold stored in Sacks' solution (47% vs 23%;P<0.05). Recipient hemodilution did not improve graft viability (39% vs 32%; NS). Kidneys cold stored for 24 h were viable to a greater extent than kidneys with a CIT of 36 h (50% vs 15%;P<0.01).     

A prospective randomized multicenter trial comparing histidine–tryptophane–ketoglutarate versus University of Wisconsin perfusion solution in clinical pancreas transplantation

We aimed to evaluate early pancreas transplant graft function after histidine–tryptophan–ketoglutarate (HTK) versus University of Wisconsin (UW) perfusion. Prospective randomized multicenter study including 68 pancreas transplantations stratified according to preservation fluid used (27 HTK vs. 41 UW). Primary endpoint was pancreas graft survival at 6 months. Serum α-amylase, lipase, C-peptide, HbA1C and exogenous insulin requirement were compared at several time points. Mean pancreas cold ischemia time was 10.8 ± 3.7 (HTK) vs. 11.8 ± 3.4 h (UW) ( P  = 0.247). Simultaneous pancreas–kidney transplantation was performed in 95.6% of the patients, pancreas transplantation alone in 2.9%, and pancreas after kidney transplantation in 1.5%. Six months graft survival was 85.2% (HTK) vs. 90.2% (UW) ( P  = 0.703). Serum amylase and lipase values did not differ between both the groups during the observation period. C-peptide levels were elevated in both the groups without significant differences at each time point. Higher exogenous insulin requirement early after transplantation in the UW group had resolved at 3 months. Six month patient survival was 96.3% (HTK) vs. 100% (UW) ( P  = 0.397). With a mean cold ischemia time of 10 h in this study, HTK and UW solutions appear to be equally suitable for perfusion and organ preservation in clinical pancreas transplantation.     

Organ preservation with histidine-tryptophan ketogluatarate solution in clinical pancreas transplantation: an update of the indiana university experience

In May 2003, University of Wisconsin (UW) solution was replaced with Histidine-Tryptophan Ketoglutarate (HTK) solution as the preservation fluid for abdominal organ procurements in our center. Herein we have reported our updated results with HTK in pancreas transplantation. Between May 2003 and October 2006, 152 pancreas transplantations were performed in which 146 used HTK. The procedures were as follows: simultaneous kidney pancreas transplantation (n = 85; 55%), pancreas after kidney transplantation (n = 41; 30%), and solitary pancreas transplantation (n = 20; 15%). Donor and recipient data were collected with primary outcomes as primary nonfunction (PNF), and 30-day and 1-year graft and patient survival. Patient demographics are as follows: age (36 +/- 12 years), gender (males, 89: females, 57), race (white, 135; African American, 11). Mean flush volume was 3.8 +/- 1 L. The mean cold ischemia time was 8 +/- 3 hours. Mean warm ischemia time was 48 +/- 23 minutes. There were no cases of PNF in this cohort. Thirty-day and 1-year patient survival rates were 99% and 95%, respectively. The 30-day and 1-year graft survivals rates were 95% and 93%, respectively. There were 10 grafts lost with 7 vascular complications (6 venous and 1 arterial thrombosis). There were 2 cases of chronic rejection and 1 graft lost to noncompliance. These statistics compare favorably with International Pancreas Transplant Registry reported 1-year survival for pancreas allografts. All other patients were insulin independent by discharge. Serum fasting blood glucose and serial amylase remained comparable at all intervals posttransplantation to those of a historical UW cohort. Within this range of cold ischemia times, HTK appears to provide effective pancreas preservation.     

Comparison of UW solution and Euro-Collins solutions for cold preservation of human liver grafts

University of Wisconsin solution, a new organ preservation medium, is reported to extend the period of cold storage. In order to evaluate the efficacy of UW solution in human liver preservation we compared 58 donor liver grafts preserved in Euro-Collins (EC) solution. All livers were harvested in a similar manner. Donor and recipient characteristics in the two groups were comparable. The mean preservation time of the UW solution was 11.5 +/- 4.2 hr (range 3-20 hr), significantly longer than the EC mean preservation time of 4.9 +/- 1.6 hr (2-9.6 hr) (P = 0.0001). Evaluation of mean postoperative liver function tests and coagulation factors on days 1-7 showed no statistical difference between the two groups. There was one primary graft nonfunction in the EC group and none with the UW organs. Hepatic artery thrombosis was similar in each group. The incidence of early retransplantation was similar. Three-month graft survival was 81% in the UW group vs. 73% in the EC group. Patient survival at three months was 87% with the UW organs and 84% with the EC organs. We conclude that cold storage of liver grafts in the UW solution has allowed for significantly longer preservation, permitting transplantation to be performed under semielective conditions and procurement of organs from much further distances. Grafts stored in UW solution perform as well as those stored in Euro-Collins, with no significant difference in liver function abnormalities postoperatively.     

Early pancreas transplant outcomes with histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate preservation: a multicenter study

Little is known about the use of histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) preservation solution for pancreas preservation. We compared early pancreas graft outcomes at four pancreas transplant programs within the state of Michigan in 2002 and 2003 (University of Wisconsin [UW] era) with those in 2004 (HTK era). The primary endpoint was early graft loss. The UW group (n=41) and the HTK group (n=36) had similar outcomes with respect to: technical graft loss (9.8% vs. 8.3%, P=NS), 90-day graft function (90.2% vs. 86.1%, P=NS), and rate of pancreatic leak/abscess (12.2% vs. 11.1%, P=NS). There were also no significant differences in postoperative amylase and lipase levels between the two groups. The HTK group did have significantly more acute rejection within the first 180 days (25.0% vs. 9.8%, P<0.05). HTK is a suitable substitute for UW in the preservation of pancreas allografts.     

Functional and structural integrity of porcine pancreatic grafts subjected to a period of warm ischemia and cold preservation with histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (custodiol) or University of Wisconsin solution

BACKGROUND: University of Wisconsin (UW) solution (Viaspan) is currently used to preserve organs from nonheartbeating donors. Histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) solution (Custodiol) is of proven efficacy in experimental pancreas preservation, but its efficacy in combined warm ischemia (WI) and cold ischemia (CI) is unknown. The viability of HTK-preserved porcine pancreatic grafts was assessed after various periods of WI and compared with grafts flushed and preserved with UW solution. METHODS: A total of 14 pigs were used: G1 (n=4, UW) and G2 (n=4, HTK) with 15-min WI and 16-hr cold storage; G3 (n=3, UW) and G4 (n=3, HTK) with 30-min WI and 16-hr cold storage. RESULTS: All animals in G1 and G2 were normoglycemic, whereas only 66% of pancreases were functioning in G3 and G4. HTK perfusion was associated with increased wet weight. Transient hyperinsulinemia was noted in all the groups on postoperative day 1 (mean range: 8.9-12.4 microU/L). Postoperative serum amylase and lipase were more pronounced in G3 and G4. However, HTK-stored grafts exhibited less evidence of biochemical pancreatitis as compared with UW-stored grafts on the first postoperative day in the group with 15-min WI. Mean K values of intravenous glucose tolerance tests on postoperative day 14 were similar in both groups. Vascular congestion was uniformly observed and was considered a typical feature of WI. CONCLUSIONS: Porcine pancreatic grafts are viable after 16-hr CI following 15-min WI in this experimental nonheartbeating donor model. HTK solution seems to provide reliable graft function in this setting and to be equivalent to UW.     

Efficacy and safety of Celsior preservation fluid in liver transplantation: one-year follow up of a prospective, multicenter, non-randomized study

The purpose of this prospective, nine-center, non-randomized study was to assess the efficacy and safety of Celsior preservation fluid in liver transplantation using unselected donors. As data comparing allograft outcomes following liver transplantation using Celsior and University of Wisconsin (UW) preservation fluids are limited, we also compared our cohort with matched controls selected from the European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR) who received total liver grafts preserved with UW solution during the same period. One hundred and forty patients who received livers preserved with Celsior were included. The primary endpoint, graft loss at one-yr post-transplantation, was observed in 24 patients (17.1%) which was not significantly different from the 20.0% pre-defined threshold rate (95% confidence interval [CI] 10.9, 23.4; p=0.398). Predictive factors for graft loss on univariate analysis were moderate-to-severe steatosis on the donor graft (5/22 patients with graft loss vs. 8/107 patients without, p=0.046) and duration of warm ischemia (1.4±1.1 h in patients with graft loss vs. 0.9±0.5 h in patients without, p=0.034). Hepatic artery thrombosis and stenosis occurred in seven (5.0%) and six (4.3%) patients, respectively. The comparison of our patients to 420 ELTR controls showed that one-yr graft survival rates (Celsior: 82.9%, 95% CI 75.8, 88.2; UW: 78.6%, 95% CI 74.4, 82.2) and Kaplan-Meier one-yr graft survival distributions (p=0.285) were similar. Within the cold ischemia time achieved in our study, liver preservation with Celsior appeared efficient and safe. Comparison with ELTR patients suggested that liver allograft survival was similar using Celsior or UW solution for preservation of unselected donor grafts.     

Pancreas transplants from donors aged 45 years or older

AIMS: Since donor age of 45 years or more is considered a relative contraindication for pancreas transplantation (PTx), we herein report our experience with these donors. METHODS: Pancreases from donors aged 45 years or older were used in 16 of 147 PTx procedures (11%). The final decision to accept a graft for PTx was based mainly on the quality of visceral perfusion and the gross appearance of the pancreas and the vessels. There were 9 men and 7 women, ranging in age from 45 to 55 years (average, 48.9 years) who were donors, due to cerebrovascular accidents (n = 11; 68.7%). Among the donor group, 5 patients were receiving multiple vasopressor agents (31.2%), and 2 had a history of cardiac arrest (12.5%). Pancreases were transplanted either simultaneously with a cadaveric kidney (n = 6) or as solitary grafts (n = 10). RESULTS: After a mean period of cold preservation of 616 minutes (range, 475 to 844 min), delayed endocrine function occurred in 1 recipient (6%), who subsequently achieved insulin independence. Two recipients died suddenly, with functioning grafts. Two further grafts were lost due to portal vein thrombosis (6%) or late arterial thrombosis (6%). Three patients required repeat surgery (18.7%). After a mean follow-up period of 26.6 months, actuarial 1-year and 5-year patient survival rates were 87.5%, with insulin independence in 81.2% and 67.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Meticulous donor selection and short preservation times allow the safe use of pancreases procured from donors aged 45 years or older, thus expanding the donor pool for PTx procedures.     

Follow-up experience using histidine-tryptophan ketoglutarate solution in clinical pancreas transplantation

In May 2003, at Indiana University, the standard cold preservation solution University of Wisconsin (UW) solution was replaced by histidine-tryptophan ketogluatarate (HTK) solution. Earlier, we presented our initial experience with HTK in pancreas preservation with an analysis of the first 10 pancreas transplants. Here we report updated results with HTK in pancreas transplantation over the past 18 months. Between May 2003 and March 2005, a total of 87 pancreas transplants were performed with 78 of these organs utilizing HTK. Seventy five patients received 78 organ transplants. Surgical procedures performed were: simultaneous kidney pancreas transplantation (n = 50, 64%), pancreas after kidney transplantation (n = 19, 24%), solitary pancreas transplantation (n = 9, 12%). Donor and recipient data were collected with primary outcomes as primary nonfunction and 30-day graft and patient survivals, and compared to the UW cohort from our original report. Donor and recipient demographics were similar. Mean follow-up time is 12 +/- 6 months. The mean cold ischemia time was 9 +/- 3 hours. There were no cases of primary graft nonfunction. Thirty-day and 1-year patient survivals were 99% and 93%. The 30-day and 1-year graft survivals were 96% and 93%. There were five grafts lost, including three within the first month (two venous and one arterial thrombosis). There was one case of chronic rejection and one noncompliance. All other patients were insulin-independent by discharge. Serum fasting blood glucose and serial amylase remained comparable at all intervals posttransplantation. Within this range of cold ischemia time, HTK appears to provide effective pancreas preservation.