Effect of remifentanil on the haemodynamic response to orotracheal intubation

We have examined the effect of remifentanil on the haemodynamic response to orotracheal intubation in a randomized, double-blind study. We studied 40 patients allocated to one of four groups of 10 each, to receive the following immediately before induction of anaesthesia: remifentanil 1 microgram kg-1 bolus over 30 s, followed by an infusion of 0.5 microgram kg-1 min-1; saline placebo only; glycopyrrolate 200 micrograms and remifentanil 1 microgram kg-1 bolus over 30 s, followed by an infusion of 0.5 microgram kg-1 min-1; or glycopyrrolate 200 micrograms only. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol, vecuronium and 1% isoflurane with 66% nitrous oxide in oxygen. The trachea was intubated under direct laryngoscopy 3 min after induction of anaesthesia. Arterial pressure and heart rate were measured non- invasively, immediately before induction of anaesthesia and then at 1- min intervals. Remifentanil was found to effectively attenuate the pressor response to intubation (P < 0.05 for the increase in mean arterial pressure; P < 0.01 for the increase in heart rate). In the absence of a concurrent vagolytic agent, remifentanil was associated with bradycardia or hypotension, or both, in five of 10 patients, compared with one patient who received remifentanil and glycopyrrolate.      

Effect of a remifentanil bolus dose on the cardiovascular response to emergence from anaesthesia and tracheal extubation

We have examined the effect of remifentanil on the haemodynamic response to emergence from anaesthesia and tracheal extubation in 40 ASA I-II female patients undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy, in a randomized, double-blind study. All patients received a standard general anaesthetic comprising propofol, vecuronium and 1% isoflurane with 66% nitrous oxide in oxygen. At the end of surgery, a bolus dose of remifentanil 1 microgram kg-1 (n = 20) or saline placebo (n = 20) was given and tracheal extubation was performed when standard criteria were achieved. Arterial pressure and heart rate were recorded non- invasively at 1-min intervals from the end of surgery. Remifentanil attenuated the increase in both mean arterial pressure (P < 0.001) and heart rate (P < 0.05) at extubation. Mean time to extubation was 7.2 (SEM 0.6) min and 4.0 (0.5) min in the remifentanil and saline groups, respectively (P < 0.001). There was no difference in the incidence of coughing at extubation, time to recovery from anaesthesia or time to fitness for discharge from the recovery room.      

Remifentanil vs. fentanyl during interventional rigid bronchoscopy under general anaesthesia and spontaneous assisted ventilation.

The treatment of tracheo-bronchial diseases with rigid bronchoscopy requires general anaesthesia without tracheal intubation. Spontaneous assisted ventilation is a safe modality of ventilation. In this study the use of remifentanil and fentanyl is compared during rigid bronchoscopy with spontaneous assisted ventilation. Ninety high-risk patients received fentanyl or remifentanil with propofol for general anaesthesia. During the maintenance fentanyl was delivered at 6.1 +/- 4.6 micrograms kg-1 h-1 and remifentanil at 0.15 +/- 0.07 microgram kg-1 min-1. The same degree of intra-operative respiratory acidosis with similar good operating conditions resulted in both groups. Patients treated with remifentanil recovered more quickly compared with those in the fentanyl group (3.8 +/- 2 vs. 10.4 +/- 9.2 min, P < 0.001). In conclusion, the use of remifentanil during rigid bronchoscopy under general anaesthesia with spontaneous assisted ventilation is safe and assures good operating conditions. Moreover, remifentanil permits a more rapid recovery than fentanyl. The dose of remifentanil is higher than previously described for spontaneously breathing patients.     

Sympathetic Ganglionic Blockade Masks Beneficial Effect of Isoflurane on Histologic Outcome from Near-complete Forebrain Ischemia in the Rat

Background: Isoflurane-anesthetized rats have better outcome from global cerebral ischemia than rats anesthetized with fentanyl and nitrous oxide. The authors wanted to determine whether circulating catecholamine concentrations depend on the anesthetic agent and whether sympathetic ganglionic blockade affects anesthetic-mediated differences in outcome from near-complete forebrain ischemia.

Methods: For two different experiments, normothermic Sprague-Dawley rats that had fasted were assigned to one of four groups and subjected to 10 min of 30 mmHg mean arterial pressure and bilateral carotid occlusion. Rats were anesthetized with 1.4% isoflurane or fentanyl (25 [micro sign]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] h-1) and 70% nitrous oxide, with or without preischemic trimethaphan (2.5 mg given intravenously). In experiment 1, arterial plasma catecholamine concentrations were measured before, at 2 and 8 min during, and after ischemia (n = 5-8). In experiment 2, animals (n = 15) underwent histologic analysis 5 days after ischemia.

Results: In experiment 1, intraischemic increases in plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine levels were 28 and 12 times greater in the fentanyl-nitrous oxide group than in the isoflurane group (P < 0.01). Trimethaphan blocked all changes in plasma catecholamine concentrations (P < 0.02). In experiment 2, isoflurane reduced the mean +/- SD percentage of dead hippocampal CA1 neurons compared with fentanyl-nitrous oxide (43 +/- 22% vs. 87 +/- 10%; P < 0.001). Trimethaphan abolished the beneficial effects of isoflurane (91 +/- 6%; P < 0.001). Similar observations were made in the cortex.     

An open, randomized comparison of alfentanil, remifentanil and alfentanil followed by remifentanil in anaesthesia for craniotomy

We studied 52 adults undergoing elective craniotomy, allocated randomly to one of three opioid treatments: alfentanil 50 micrograms kg-1 followed by 0.833 microgram kg-1 min-1 until dural closure (group Alf.); alfentanil 50 micrograms kg-1 followed by 0.833 microgram kg-1 min-1 for 2 h, then remifentanil 0.25 microgram kg-1 min-1 (group Alf.- Remi.); or remifentanil 1 microgram kg-1 followed by 0.5 microgram kg-1 min-1 reducing to 0.25 microgram kg-1 min-1 after craniotomy (group Remi.). Anaesthesia was maintained with infusion of propofol and 66% nitrous oxide in oxygen. Infusions of propofol and remifentanil were stopped at head bandaging. Group Remi. had the least intraoperative haemodynamic responses and group Alf. the most (P < 0.05). Times to tracheal extubation and obey commands were similar in all groups. In all patients in group Alf.-Remi. and group Remi., the trachea was extubated 27 min from the end of anaesthesia; three patients in group Alf. were slower to recover. Use of analgesia in the recovery room and time to transfer to the neurosurgical unit were similar in the three groups.      

Effects of remifentanil and fentanyl on intraocular pressure during the maintenance and recovery of anaesthesia in patients undergoing non-ophthalmic surgery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of remifentanil and fentanyl on intraocular pressure during the maintenance and recovery of anaesthesia in patients undergoing elective non-ophthalmic surgery. METHODS: Thirty-two patients (ASA I-II) were randomized into two groups to receive either a continuous infusion of remifentanil (0.25-0.5 microg kg(-1) min(-1), n =16, Group R) or an intermittent bolus of fentanyl (2-5 microg kg(-1), n = 16, Group F) during the maintenance of anaesthesia. For the induction of anaesthesia, Group R received remifentanil 1 microg kg(-1) and Group F received fentanyl 2 microg kg(-1); both groups then received propofol 2 mg kg(-1) with vecuronium 0.1 mg kg(-1). Anaesthesia in both groups was maintained with a continuous infusion of propofol 4-8 mg kg(-1) h(-1). Ventilation of the lungs was controlled to a constant end-tidal PCO2 of 4.7-5.4 kPa. Blood pressure, electrocardiography, heart rate and oxygen saturation were monitored throughout anaesthesia. Intraocular pressure was determined before surgery, during the maintenance of anaesthesia, 2 min after emergence and in the recovery room using a Perkins hand-held applanation tonometer by an ophthalmologist blinded to the anaesthetic technique. RESULTS: After induction of anaesthesia, a significant decrease in intraocular pressure in the remifentanil group from 13.6 +/- 2.6 to 7.1 +/- 3.1 mmHg (P < 0.001) and in the fentanyl group from 13.7 +/- 2.2 to 9.7 +/- 3.4 mmHg (P < 0.001) was observed and maintained during anaesthesia. Thirty minutes after the end of anaesthesia, intraocular pressure returned to baseline values in both groups (remifentanil: 13.9 +/- 2.8 mmHg, P = 0.28; fentanyl: 13.6 +/- 2.3 mmHg, P = 0.59). The intraocular pressure and haemodynamic variables did not differ significantly between the two groups (intraocular pressure, P = 0.7327; blood pressure, P = 0.1295; heart rate, P = 0.8601). CONCLUSIONS: Remifentanil maintains intraocular pressure at an equally reduced level compared with fentanyl.     

Recovery and cognitive function after fentanyl or remifentanil administration for carotid endarterectomy

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare recovery and restoration of cognitive function after fentanyl-propofol or remifentanil-propofol anesthesia administration in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, prospective study. SETTING: Department of Anesthesiology, University hospital. PATIENTS: Seventy patients with ASA physical statuses II and III (53 men and 17 women) undergoing elective carotid endarterectomy. INTERVENTIONS: Anesthetic technique and drugs were identical in the 2 groups, with the exception of remifentanil and fentanyl administration. Induction of anesthesia was obtained with a bolus dose of propofol (1-2 mg/kg), maintenance was achieved with a propofol infusion according to hemodynamics and nitrous oxide/oxygen (FIO(2), 0.50). Muscle relaxation was achieved with rocuronium. The remifentanil group received 1 microg/kg of remifentanil as a single dose during the induction of anesthesia and 0.5 microg/kg per minute as an infusion throughout the procedure. The fentanyl group received 2 microg/kg of fentanyl as a single dose during the induction of anesthesia. MEASUREMENTS: Intraoperative hemodynamic adverse events were recorded. All patients were also evaluated with regard to their recovery and the restoration of their cognitive function, recording the immediate recovery times and using the Aldrete score 15 and 60 minutes after surgery and the Hasegawa scale 6 hours after surgery. For evaluation of postoperative pain, the Numeric Pain Scale (0-10) was used. MAIN RESULTS: Patients receiving remifentanil had significantly (P < .05) fewer episodes of intraoperative hypertension and needed nitroglycerine administration less frequently (P < .05) than those receiving fentanyl. Immediate recovery was significantly earlier (P < .05) with remifentanil (eye opening, 5.1 +/- 1.3 [remifentanil] and 7.2 +/- 3.7 [fentanyl] minutes; extubation time, 5.4 +/- 1.9 [remifentanil] and 7.8 +/- 4.1 [fentanyl] minutes). The Hasegawa Dementia Scale scores 6 hours after surgery and Aldrete scores 15 and 60 minutes after surgery did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. Pain levels were also similar for patients taking remifentanil and fentanyl. CONCLUSIONS: Although intraoperative hemodynamics were better preserved and immediate recovery was more rapid with remifentanil, overall postoperative recovery and restoration of cognitive functions as well as postoperative pain intensity seem to be similar for patients receiving remifentanil and for those receiving fentanyl combined with propofol for carotid endarterectomy operations.     

Bispectral index-guided administration of anaesthesia: comparison between remifentanil/propofol and remifentanil/isoflurane

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The bispectral index of the electroencephalogram is a measure of the hypnotic component of anaesthesia and can be used to guide the administration of anaesthesia. This study compares bispectral index-guided anaesthesia with remifentanil and either propofol or isoflurane. METHODS: Eighty consenting patients were randomly assigned to two groups. Following induction with propofol and remifentanil, anaesthesia was maintained with remifentanil/propofol or remifentanil/isoflurane. Remifentanil infusion rates were guided by haemodynamic responses--maintaining mean arterial pressure and heart rate within 20% of baseline. Propofol and isoflurane administration was guided using the bispectral index (45-60). Thirty minutes before the end of surgery, morphine was administered (0.15 mg kg(-1) intravenously). Fifteen minutes before end of surgery, propofol and isoflurane were reduced (bispectral index 60-75). At the end of surgery, the anaesthetic agents were discontinued. Groups were compared for recovery, remifentanil doses and signs of inadequate anaesthesia using the chi2-test and ANOVA (P < 0.05). RESULTS: The duration of surgery was longer in the propofol/remifentanil group (121 +/- 53 versus 94 +/- 40 min). Recovery data were not different between groups. The remifentanil infusion rate was significantly lower with additional isoflurane (0.18 +/- 0.06 microg kg(-1) min(-1)) than with additional propofol (0.31 +/- 0.20 microg kg(-1) min(-1)). The propofol infusion rate was 123 +/- 48 microg kg(-1) min(-1); isoflurane concentration was 0.66 +/- 0.13%. CONCLUSIONS: Bispectral index-guided anaesthesia with remifentanil plus propofol or isoflurane results in the absence of postoperative recall and a fast recovery with both drug combinations. In our patients, at comparable bispectral index-levels, haemodynamic control requires higher doses of remifentanil with propofol than with isoflurane.     

Effects of propofol and isoflurane on the neuromuscular block induced by atracurium]

Speed of onset, duration of action and recovery time for a bolus injection of atracurium were measured in two groups of patients. In group I anaesthesia considered of propofol, fentanyl, nitrous oxide and oxygen mixture. The induction dose of propofol was 2 mg/kg-1 followed by an infusion of 9.0 mg/kg-1/h-1 for first half hour and 4.5 mg/Kg-1/h-1 subsequently. In group II anaesthesia consisted of isoflurane, fentanyl, nitrous oxide and oxygen mixture. Isoflurane was given upon clinical needs. Speed of onset, duration of action, and recovery time for atracurium were measured in the two groups. No statistically significant differences between speed of onset and duration of action between the two groups were found. The recovery period from T1 = 10% to T1 = 70% twitch response was considerably longer with isoflurane (25 min +/- 6) than with propofol (18 min +/- 3) (p less than 0.01). Results obtained suggest that for adequate relaxation during tracheal intubation smaller doses of atracurium are not needed during isoflurane than propofol administration. Because of the longer recovery period of residual neuromuscular blockade during isoflurane anaesthesia decreasing doses of atracurium and careful monitoring of twitch depression tension are also suggested.     

Recovery and discharge of patients after long propofol infusion vs isoflurane anaesthesia for ambulatory surgery

Fifty unpremedicated patients scheduled for outpatient restorative dentistry and/or oral surgery lasting 2 to 4 h were anaesthetized with either propofol infusion or isoflurane inhalation. Before induction of anaesthesia with propofol (2.5 mg.kg-1), all patients were given 75 mg of diclofenac and 0.01 mg.kg-1 vecuronium intravenously. Intubation was facilitated with suxamethonium (1.5 mg.kg-1) and anaesthesia was maintained in random order either with propofol infusion (12 mg.kg-1.h-1 for the first 20 min, 9 mg.kg-1.h-1 for the next 20 min, and 6 mg.kg-1.h-1 for the rest of the anaesthesia) or with isoflurane (inspired concentration 1-2.5%), both with nitrous oxide and oxygen (30%). The patients breathed spontaneously using a non-rebreathing circuit. Patients given propofol infusion became re-orientated faster (11.0 +/- 5.5 min vs. 16.5 +/- 7.5 min; P less than 0.01) and at 30 min walked along a straight line better (P less than 0.01). At 60 min, none of the propofol patients displayed an unsteady gait, whereas 11 of the 25 isoflurane patients did (P less than 0.001). None of the patients receiving propofol had emesis at the clinic, compared with 10 of the 25 patients receiving isoflurane (P less than 0.001). The overall incidence of emesis was 2 of 25 and 14 of 25 in the propofol and isoflurane groups, respectively (P less than 0.01). Patients receiving propofol were discharged home earlier than patients receiving isoflurane (80 +/- 14 min and 102 +/- 32 min, respectively; P less than 0.01). It is concluded that propofol allows early discharge of patients, even after long anaesthesias.     

Comparison of different doses of remifentanil on the cardiovascular response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation

We have compared three bolus and infusion regimens of remifentanil on the cardiovascular response to laryngoscopy and orotracheal intubation in three groups of 20 ASA I-II female patients, in a randomized, double- blind study. Patients in group 1 received glycopyrolate 200 micrograms i.v. followed by a bolus dose of remifentanil 1 microgram kg-1 over 30 s and an infusion of remifentanil at a rate of 0.5 microgram kg-1 min- 1. The other patients received remifentanil 0.5 microgram kg-1 over 30 s and an infusion of 0.25 microgram kg-1 min-1 with (group 2) or without (group 3) pretreatment with glycopyrrolate 200 micrograms. All patients then received a sleep dose of propofol, rocuronium 0.6 mg kg-1 and 1% isoflurane with 67% nitrous oxide in oxygen. Laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation were performed 3 min later. Heart rate and arterial pressure were recorded at 1-min intervals from before induction of anaesthesia until 5 min after intubation. Baseline heart rate was similar in all groups, but decreased in group 3 (no glycopyrrolate) after induction and remained significantly lower after intubation compared with the other groups (P < 0.05). Heart rate and arterial pressure increased slightly after intubation in each group but there were no significant differences in mean arterial pressure between groups at any time. The incidence of bradycardia (one patient in group 2) and hypotension (two patients in groups 1 and 2 and three patients in group 3) was low.      

The effect of lidocaine on neutrophil respiratory burst during induction of general anaesthesia and tracheal intubation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Respiratory burst is an essential component of the neutrophil's biocidal function. In vitro, sodium thiopental, isoflurane and lidocaine each inhibit neutrophil respiratory burst. The objectives of this study were (a) to determine the effect of a standard clinical induction/tracheal intubation sequence on neutrophil respiratory burst and (b) to determine the effect of intravenous lidocaine administration during induction of anaesthesia on neutrophil respiratory burst. METHODS: Twenty ASA I and II patients, aged 18-60 years, undergoing elective surgery were studied. After induction of anaesthesia [fentanyl (2 microg kg-1), thiopental (4-6 mg kg-1), isoflurane (end-tidal concentration 0.5-1.5%) in nitrous oxide (66%) and oxygen], patients randomly received either lidocaine 1.5 mg kg-1 (group L) or 0.9% saline (group S) prior to tracheal intubation. Neutrophil respiratory burst was measured immediately prior to induction of anaesthesia, immediately before and 1 and 5 min after lidocaine/saline. RESULTS: Neutrophil respiratory burst decreased significantly after induction of anaesthesia in both groups [87.4 +/- 8.2% (group L) and 88.5 +/- 13.4% (group S) of preinduction level (P < 0.01 both groups)]. After intravenous lidocaine (but not saline) administration, neutrophil respiratory burst returned towards preinduction levels, both before (97.1 +/- 23.6%) and after (94.4 +/- 16.6%) tracheal intubation. CONCLUSION: Induction of anaesthesia and tracheal intubation using thiopentone and isoflurane, inhibit neutrophil respiratory burst. This effect may be diminished by the administration of lidocaine.     

Differential Effects of Anesthetic Agents on Outcome from Near-complete but Not Incomplete Global Ischemia in the Rat

Background: It has been postulated that anesthetic agents that reduce cerebral metabolic rate will protect the brain against ischemia when electroencephalographic (EEG) activity is persistent, but will provide no protection when ischemia is severe enough to cause EEG isoelectricity. No outcome studies have addressed this issue. The authors studied anesthetic agents to determine if they provide differential effects on outcome from global cerebral ischemic insults that cause either an attenuated or isoelectric EEG.

Methods: Fasted rats were subjected to either (1) incomplete ischemia (attenuated EEG; 20 min of mean arterial pressure [MAP] = 50 mmHg and bilateral carotid occlusion) or (2) near-complete ischemia (isoelectric EEG; 10 min of MAP = 30 mmHg and bilateral carotid occlusion) while anesthetized with 1.4% isoflurane, 1 mg [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1 ketamine, or 25 [micro sign]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] h-1 70% nitrous oxide and fentanyl. The brain was maintained at normothermia during ischemia and for 22 h after ischemia. Five days later, hippocampal CA1 and cortical injury were measured.

Results: There was no difference among anesthetic agents during incomplete ischemia for mean +/- SD percentage dead CA1 neurons (fentanyl, 38% +/- 20%; isoflurane, 31% +/- 10%; ketamine, 40% +/- 19%; P = 0.38). During near-complete ischemia, there was a difference among anesthetic agents (fentanyl, 88% +/- 9%; isoflurane, 37% +/- 20%; ketamine, 70% +/- 28%; P = 0.00008). Isoflurane was protective compared with fentanyl (P = 0.00007) and ketamine (P = 0.0061). There was no difference between fentanyl and ketamine (P = 0.143). Similar observations were made in the cortex. Neurologic function correlated with histologic damage.     

Remifentanil infusion for cleft palate surgery in young infants

BACKGROUND: The residual depressant effect of opioid is a major concern in infants scheduled for cleft palate repair. Remifentanil is associated with a fast and predictable recovery, independent of age. METHODS: About 40 infants in the 2-12 month age range were prospectively enrolled in this open study, to receive either remifentanil (infusion starting at 0.25 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) or sufentanil as part of a balanced anaesthesia regimen. Isoflurane was maintained at an endtidal concentration of 1.2% in oxygen and nitrous oxide and the opioid dosing was titrated to autonomic responses. Postoperative pain relief was provided by morphine infusion. Morphine administration started intraoperatively in the remifentanil group. RESULTS: Consistent haemodynamic stability was achieved throughout surgery in both groups. Infants of the remifentanil group required, on average, lower concentrations of isoflurane than children of the sufentanil group (1.2 +/- 0.2% vs 1.7 +/- 0.3%, P < 0.001). The median time from last suture to tracheal extubation was 12.5 min (5-25 min) in the remifentanil group and 15.0 min (10-30 min) in the sufentanil group. There was no evidence of hyperalgesia or enhanced morphine consumption in the remifentanil group compared with the sufentanil group. Postoperative pain scores were even lower in the remifentanil group, compared with the sufentanil group, soon after arrival in the postanaesthesia care unit. CONCLUSIONS: Remifentanil-based anaesthesia appeared well suited for primary cleft palate repair in young infants.     

TIVA mit Propofol/Remifentanil oder balancierte Anästhesie mit Sevofluran/Fentanyl bei laparoskopischen Operationen

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to investigate the differences between TIVA with propofol/remifentanil (P/R) and balanced anaesthesia with sevoflurane/fentanyl (S/F) in gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. Emphasis was put on haemodynamic reaction, recovery profile, postoperative side effects and patient satisfaction. METHODS: Sixty patients were randomly assigned to receive either total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol/remifentanil or anaesthesia with sevoflurane/fentanyl. After premedication (midazolam) and induction of anesthesia (propofol, atracurium) in both groups, either 1 microgram/kg fentanyl (S/F) or 1 microgram/kg remifentanil (P/R) was injected. Anaesthesia was maintained with 0.5 microgram/kg/min remifentanil (reduced to 50% after 5 min) and 0.06 microgram/kg/min propofol (P/R) or 1.7 vol % sevoflurane (S/F). Both groups were mechanically ventilated with 30% oxygen in air. The administration of sevoflurane and the infusion of the anaesthetics were adjusted to maintain a surgical depth of anaesthesia. For postoperative analgesia 1 g paracetamol was administered rectally prior to surgery. After recovery 20 mg/kg metamizol was given intravenously. At the end of surgery the anaesthetics were discontinued and haemodynamics, early emergence from anaesthesia, pain level, frequency of analgesic demand, incidence of PONV, shivering and patient satisfaction were assessed. Parameters were recorded for 24 h postoperatively. RESULTS: Recovery time after propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia was significantly shorter than after administration of sevoflurane and fentanyl (spontaneous ventilation 4.1 vs. 6.3 min, extubation 4.3 vs. 9.3 min, eye opening 4.4 vs 8.2 min, stating name 5.3 vs. 13.2 min, stating date of birth 5.4 vs. 13.3 min). There were no significant differences between the groups in shivering, pain score, analgesic demand and PONV. The S/F group responded to tracheal intubation with significantly higher blood pressure than the P/R group. During maintenance of anaesthesia heart rate in patients with S/F was significantly higher (P/R:HR max +16/-10; S/F:HR max +24/-0.). Measured on a scale (S/F 62%). CONCLUSION: Compared with patients given balanced anaesthesia with sevoflurane and fentanyl, TIVA with propofol and remifentanil proved to be particularly suited for gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. Its major advantages are haemodynamic stability, significantly shorter times of emergence, and the exceptional acceptance by the patients.     

Nicardipine HCL: clinical experience in patients undergoing anaesthesia for intracranial aneurysm clipping

Previous studies have reported haemodynamic interactions between dihydropyridine calcium antagonists and general anaesthesia. During anaesthesia for intracranial aneurysm surgery, we prospectively compared haemodynamic values obtained from 13 patients being treated with nicardipine HCl (0.15 mg.kg-1.hr-1 IV) for cerebral vasospasm against values obtained from 11 untreated controls. Prior to induction of anaesthesia, nicardipine-treated patients had significantly elevated mean +/- SD cardiac index (5.67 +/- 1.30 vs 3.99 +/- 0.73 L.min-1.m-2) while MAP (86 +/- 10 vs 99 +/- 14 mmHg) and systemic vascular resistance (647 +/- 227 vs 1141 +/- 404 dynes.sec-1.cm-5) were reduced. Heart rate, CVP, and PACWP were similar between groups. Anaesthesia induction and tracheal intubation resulted in similar haemodynamic values between groups with the exception of CVP (10 +/- 5 vs 5 +/- 2 mmHg) and PACWP (15 +/- 5 vs 8 +/- 3 mmHg) which were elevated in the nicardipine group (P less than 0.01). Mannitol infusion and deliberate hypotension resulted in nearly identical haemodynamic responses in both groups. Nicardipine-treated patients required more intravenous fluids during the operative procedure (2.4 +/- 0.3 L vs 1.5 +/- 0.4 L, P less than 0.05) and were less likely to require isoflurane supplementation to morphine sulphate/nitrous oxide anaesthesia (P less than 0.01). In summary, our experience with nicardipine HCl revealed no major untoward effects with respect to maintenance of intraoperative haemodynamic stability despite continuous antivasospasm therapy with this vasodilator.     

Sympathetic ganglionic blockade masks beneficial effect of isoflurane on histologic outcome from near-complete forebrain ischemia in the rat

BACKGROUND: Isoflurane-anesthetized rats have better outcome from global cerebral ischemia than rats anesthetized with fentanyl and nitrous oxide. The authors wanted to determine whether circulating catecholamine concentrations depend on the anesthetic agent and whether sympathetic ganglionic blockade affects anesthetic-mediated differences in outcome from near-complete forebrain ischemia. METHODS: For two different experiments, normothermic Sprague-Dawley rats that had fasted were assigned to one of four groups and subjected to 10 min of 30 mm Hg mean arterial pressure and bilateral carotid occlusion. Rats were anesthetized with 1.4% isoflurane or fentanyl (25 microg x kg(-1) x h(-1)) and 70% nitrous oxide, with or without preischemic trimethaphan (2.5 mg given intravenously). In experiment 1, arterial plasma catecholamine concentrations were measured before, at 2 and 8 min during, and after ischemia (n = 5-8). In experiment 2, animals (n = 15) underwent histologic analysis 5 days after ischemia. RESULTS: In experiment 1, intraischemic increases in plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine levels were 28 and 12 times greater in the fentanyl-nitrous oxide group than in the isoflurane group (P<0.01). Trimethaphan blocked all changes in plasma catecholamine concentrations (P<0.02). In experiment 2, isoflurane reduced the mean +/- SD percentage of dead hippocampal CA1 neurons compared with fentanyl-nitrous oxide (43+/-22% vs. 87+/-10%; P<0.001). Trimethaphan abolished the beneficial effects of isoflurane (91+/-6%; P<0.001). Similar observations were made in the cortex. CONCLUSIONS: Isoflurane attenuated the peripheral sympathetic response to ischemia and improved histologic outcome compared with fentanyl and nitrous oxide. This outcome benefit was reversed by sympathetic ganglionic blockade. The beneficial effects of isoflurane may result from a neuroprotective influence of an intermediate sympathetic response that is abolished by trimethaphan.     

Desflurane maintains intraocular pressure at an equivalent level to isoflurane and propofol during unstressed non-ophthalmic surgery

We have investigated the effects of desflurane compared with isoflurane and propofol on intraocular pressure (IOP) in 48 ASA I-II patients undergoing elective non-ophthalmic surgery. Anaesthesia was induced with thiopental 3-5 mg kg-1, fentanyl 2-4 micrograms kg-1 and vecuronium 0.1 mg kg-1. Patients were allocated randomly to receive propofol (n = 16) 4-8 mg kg-1 h-1, isoflurane (n = 16) or desflurane (n = 16) for maintenance of anaesthesia. Fentanyl was added if necessary. The lungs were ventilated with 70% nitrous oxide in oxygen. Arterial pressure, electrocardiography, heart rate and end-tidal carbon dioxide were measured throughout anaesthesia. IOP was measured before surgery, during maintenance and after emergence from anaesthesia with applanation tonometry by an ophthalmologist blinded to the anaesthetic technique. There was a significant decrease in IOP after induction of anaesthesia which did not differ between groups. Desflurane maintained IOP at an equivalent level to isoflurane and propofol.      

Remifentanil and fentanyl during anaesthesia for major abdominal and gynaecological surgery. An open, comparative study of safety and efficacy.

BACKGROUND: and objective This open, multicentre study compared the efficacy and safety of remifentanil with fentanyl during balanced anaesthesia with 0.8% isoflurane (end-tidal concentration) for major abdominal and gynaecological surgery, and the efficacy and safety of remifentanil for pain management in the immediate postoperative period. METHODS: Two-hundred and eighty-six patients were randomized to receive remifentanil 1 microg kg(-1) followed by 0.2 microg kg(-1) min-1 (n=98), remifentanil 2 microg kg(-1) followed by 0.4 microg kg(-1) min(-1) (n=91) or fentanyl 3 microg kg(-1) (n=97) at induction. Thereafter, the study opioids and isoflurane were titrated to effect during the operation. RESULTS: Compared with fentanyl, remifentanil 2 microg kg(-1) followed by 0.4 microg kg(-1) min(-1) reduced the incidence of response to tracheal intubation (30% vs. 13%, P < 0.01), skin incision (33% vs. 4%, P < 0.001) and skin closure (11% vs. 3%, P < 0.05), respectively. Patients receiving remifentanil 1 microg kg(-1) followed by 0.2 microg kg(-1) min(-1) had fewer responses to skin incision than the fentanyl group (12% vs. 33%, P < 0.001), but the incidences of response to tracheal intubation and skin closure were similar. Significantly fewer patients in both remifentanil groups had > or = 1 responses to surgical stress intraoperatively compared with fentanyl (68% and 48% vs. 87%, P < 0.003). The mean isoflurane concentrations required were less in both remifentanil groups compared with the fentanyl group (0.1%, P=0.05). In remifentanil-treated patients, continuation of the infusion at 0.1 microg kg(-1) min(-1) with titration increments of +/- 0.025 microg kg(-1) min(-1) was effective for the management of immediate postoperative pain prior to transfer to morphine analgesia. However, a high proportion of patients experienced at least moderate pain whilst the titration took place. CONCLUSIONS: Anaesthesia combining isoflurane with a continuous infusion of remifentanil was significantly more effective than fentanyl at blunting responses to surgical stimuli. Significantly fewer patients responded to tracheal intubation with remifentanil at 0.4 microg kg(-1) min(-1), supporting the use of a higher initial infusion rate before intubation. Both remifentanil and fentanyl were well-tolerated, with reported adverse events typical of mu-opioid agonists.     

Nitrous oxide potentiates vecuronium neuromuscular blockade in humans

This study was designed to measure the potency of vecuronium with and without nitrous oxide. Anaesthesia was induced with thiopentone and fentanyl in 56 adult patients. The subjects were randomly assigned to receive nitrous oxide, 70%, or intermittent boluses of thiopentone and fentanyl for maintenance of anaesthesia. Train-of-four stimulation was applied to the ulnar nerve every 20 sec, and the force of contraction of the adductor pollicis muscle was measured. Vecuronium, 20, 30 or 40 micrograms.kg-1 was given by random allocation five minutes after induction of anaesthesia. Maximum depression of the first response (T1) in the train-of-four was measured, and dose-response curves were constructed. In the absence of nitrous oxide, the ED50 and ED95 were mean +/- standard error of the mean (SEM), 29.2 +/- 1.8 and 59.3 +/- 3.6 micrograms.kg-1, respectively. In the group receiving nitrous oxide, these values were 25.3 +/- 1.2 and 42.3 +/- 2.0 micrograms.kg-1 respectively. By analysis of covariance, the dose-response curves were shown to be shifted with respect to one another (P less than 0.05). Administration of nitrous oxide was associated with a 19.5% increase in potency (95% confidence limits: 1.7 to 40.4%). It is concluded that nitrous oxide has a slight potentiating effect on neuromuscular blockade, and that this effect occurs within five to ten minutes after the beginning of its administration.