Sporadic duodenal adenoma is associated with colorectal neoplasia

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the association between colorectal neoplasia and sporadic duodenal adenoma. METHODS: A retrospective case control study was conducted using the databases of two major teaching hospitals in Western Australia. The frequency of colorectal neoplasia in patients with sporadic duodenal adenomas was compared with that in a control group of patients presenting for endoscopies. The frequency of colorectal cancer in duodenal adenoma patients was also compared with the population incidence. RESULTS: Of 56 sporadic duodenal adenoma patients, 34 (61%) had been colonoscoped. When comparing the findings between patients with sporadic duodenal adenoma and an endoscoped control group, all colorectal neoplasias were significantly more common in the duodenal adenoma group (56% v 33%; odds ratio (OR) 2.4 (95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.1-5.4)). Although finding either advanced colorectal adenoma or cancer was also more common in duodenal adenoma patients (38% v 19%; OR 2.3 (95% CI 1.0-5.2)), as was finding colorectal cancer alone (21% v 8%; OR 3.0 (95% CI 1.0-9.1)), the results were not statistically significant. However, the incidence of colorectal cancer was much greater in duodenal adenoma patients than in the population (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Sporadic duodenal adenoma has a clinically important association with colorectal neoplasia. Thus patients with duodenal adenomas should undergo colonoscopy to detect colorectal neoplasia.     

Sporadic Duodenal Adenoma and Association with Colorectal Neoplasia: A Case–Control Study

Background

Sporadic duodenal adenomas are uncommon. Prior studies show that patients with sporadic duodenal adenoma have increased risk of colorectal neoplasia and should undergo colorectal screening. However, the nature of the risk, location, and type of colorectal neoplasia are not well studied.

Aim

We aimed to identify the risk of colorectal neoplasia in patients who have duodenal adenomas.

Methods

A retrospective case–control study was conducted to identify sporadic duodenal adenoma patients using the databases at one academic center. Colonoscopic findings including histology and location of colorectal cancer neoplasia in sporadic duodenal adenoma patients were compared with a control group of patients without duodenal adenomas who underwent both gastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy.

Results

Hundred and two patients with sporadic duodenal adenomas or adenocarcinomas were identified. Colonoscopy was performed in 47 patients (46 %), and colorectal neoplasia was present in 22 (46 %). There was a significantly higher rate of colorectal neoplasia in patients with sporadic duodenal adenoma (43 %) compared to the control group (24 %) odds ratio 4.8, 95 % confidence interval (1.7–7.4), but not for advanced colorectal adenoma (9 vs. 26 %, p = 0.17). Case patients had significantly more right-sided lesions than matched controls (p = 0.02).

Limitations

Single-center, retrospective study.

Conclusions

Individuals with sporadic duodenal adenomas have a significantly higher risk of colorectal neoplasia and proximal location of neoplasia. Therefore, these patients should undergo colonoscopy with particular attention to the right colon.     

Increased prevalence of colorectal neoplasia in korean patients with sporadic duodenal adenomas: a case-control study

Background/Aims

Recent data from Western populations have suggested that patients with sporadic duodenal adenomas are at a higher risk for the development of colorectal neoplasia. In this study, we compared the frequency of colorectal neoplasia in patients with sporadic duodenal adenomas to healthy control subjects.

Methods

This retrospective case-control study used the databases of 3 teaching hospitals in Gyeonggi-do Province, South Korea. The colonoscopy findings of patients with sporadic duodenal adenomas were compared with those of age- and gender-matched healthy individuals who had undergone gastroduodenoscopies and colonoscopies during general screening examinations.

Results

Between 2001 and 2008, 45 patients were diagnosed endoscopically with sporadic duodenal adenomas; 26 (58%) of these patients received colonoscopies. Colorectal neoplasia (42% vs 21%; odds ratio [OR], 2.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1 to 7.4) and advanced colorectal adenoma (19% vs 3%; OR, 9.0; 95% CI, 1.6 to 50.0) were significantly more common in patients with sporadic duodenal adenomas than in healthy control subjects.

Conclusions

Compared with healthy individuals, patients with sporadic duodenal adenomas were at a significantly higher risk for developing colorectal neoplasia. Such at-risk patients should undergo routine screening colonoscopies.     

High frequency of colorectal adenoma in patients with duodenal adenoma but without familial adenomatous polyposis

BACKGROUND: Duodenal adenomas are extremely common in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. However, it is uncertain whether patients with duodenal adenomas without familial adenomatous polyposis are at greater risk for colorectal neoplasia and, therefore, should routinely undergo surveillance colonoscopy. The aim of this study was to determine whether there is a correlation between non-papillary duodenal adenoma without familial adenomatous polyposis and colorectal adenoma. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with non-papillary duodenal adenomas without familial adenomatous polyposis, seen from January 1990 to April 2003, were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: Non-papillary duodenal polyps were diagnosed by endoscopy in the 25 patients. Of these, 21 underwent colonoscopy and one underwent proctoscopy. The mean age of these 22 patients (12 women, 10 men) was 69 years (range 50-83 years). Sixteen of the 22 patients (72.7%) with duodenal adenomas had associated colorectal adenomas. A total of 38 adenomas and one colorectal cancer were detected. The mean size of the polyps was 6.2 mm (range 3-15 mm). The adenomas were removed by snare excision or with a biopsy forceps. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of this uncontrolled, retrospective study, the frequency of colorectal adenomas in patients with duodenal polyps without familial adenomatous polyposis appears to be increased compared with the general population. All patients with duodenal polyps should undergo surveillance colonoscopy for colorectal adenomas. A prospective study to definitively establish the frequency of colorectal adenomas in these patients is warranted.     

First-degree relatives of patients with advanced colorectal adenomas have an increased prevalence of colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The risk of colorectal cancer in relatives of patients with adenomatous colonic polyps is not well defined. This study assessed whether finding colonic neoplasia during screening colonoscopy was related to the family history of colorectal cancer among the participants' parents and siblings. METHODS: Self-reported family history of colorectal cancer was recorded for all participants in a screening colonoscopy study. The size and location of all polyps were recorded before their removal and histologic examination. Participants were grouped according to the most advanced lesion detected. RESULTS: Three thousand one hundred twenty-one patients underwent complete colonoscopic examination. Subjects with adenomas were more likely to have a family history of colorectal cancer than were subjects without polyps (odds ratio [OR], 1.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-1.70). The finding of a small (<1 cm) tubular adenoma as the most advanced lesion was associated with only a modest increase in the OR of colorectal cancer in family members (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.99-1.61), but the presence of an advanced adenoma was associated with a higher OR (OR, 1.62;5% CI, 1.16-2.26). Younger age of adenoma diagnosis was not related to a higher prevalence of a family history of colorectal cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Relatives patients with advanced colorectal adenomas have an increased risk of colorectal cancer. Individuals with advanced colorectal adenomas should be counseled about the increased risk of colorectal cancer among their relatives.     

Five-year colon surveillance after screening colonoscopy

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Outcomes of colon surveillance after colorectal cancer screening with colonoscopy are uncertain. We conducted a prospective study to measure incidence of advanced neoplasia in patients within 5.5 years of screening colonoscopy. METHODS: Three thousand one hundred twenty-one asymptomatic subjects, age 50 to 75 years, had screening colonoscopy between 1994 and 1997 in the Department of Veterans Affairs. One thousand one hundred seventy-one subjects with neoplasia and 501 neoplasia-free controls were assigned to colonoscopic surveillance over 5 years. Cohorts were defined by baseline findings. Relative risks for advanced neoplasia within 5.5 years were calculated. Advanced neoplasia was defined as tubular adenoma greater than > or =10 mm, adenoma with villous histology, adenoma with high-grade dysplasia, or invasive cancer. RESULTS: Eight hundred ninety-five (76.4%) patients with neoplasia and 298 subjects (59.5%) without neoplasia at baseline had colonoscopy within 5.5 years; 2.4% of patients with no neoplasia had interval advanced neoplasia. The relative risk in patients with baseline neoplasia was 1.92 (95% CI: 0.83-4.42) with 1 or 2 tubular adenomas <10 mm, 5.01 (95% CI: 2.10-11.96) with 3 or more tubular adenomas <10 mm, 6.40 (95% CI: 2.74-14.94) with tubular adenoma > or =10 mm, 6.05 (95% CI: 2.48-14.71) for villous adenoma, and 6.87 (95% CI: 2.61-18.07) for adenoma with high-grade dysplasia. CONCLUSIONS: There is a strong association between results of baseline screening colonoscopy and rate of serious incident lesions during 5.5 years of surveillance. Patients with 1 or 2 tubular adenomas less than 10 mm represent a low-risk group compared with other patients with colon neoplasia.     

Risk factors for colorectal adenomas among immediate family members of patients with colorectal cancer in Taiwan: a case-control study

OBJECTIVES: The incidence of colorectal cancer or adenoma among first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer is significantly high. However, a well defined screening and surveillance consensus has not been developed for these families in Taiwan. We conducted this study to evaluate the colorectal adenoma prevalence pattern in screened immediate family members in Taiwan, and to derive implications for future screening programs. METHODS: A total of 234 immediate family members (aged 51.6 +/- 21.5 yr) of 186 patients with colorectal cancer were offered a colonoscopy. Each relative examined was then paired with two control subjects for age, sex, and symptoms. The prevalence of colorectal adenomas was then compared using multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The estimated risk of developing adenomas among immediate family members of patients with colorectal cancer was significantly increased (OR = 2.33; 95% CI, 1.43-3.78; p < 0.001). This trend was more striking for men (OR = 2.46; 95% CI, 1.40-4.31; p = 0.001). Immediate family members were at an increased risk for high-risk adenomas (> or = 1.0 cm, with a villous component, and/or with severe dysplasia) (OR = 4.5; 95% CI, 1.91-10.60; p = 0.002), and developed adenomas at an earlier age than did controls. Individuals with index cancer relatives diagnosed at < 50 yr of age or male relatives posed a higher risk of developing colorectal adenomas. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of colorectal adenoma in persons with a colorectal cancer family history in Taiwan is similar to that reported in Western countries. This high-risk population should be offered a screening colonoscopy beginning at 40 yr of age.     

Clinical impact of colonoscopy for patients with early gastric cancer treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection: A matched case–control study

BackgroundGastric cancer frequently occurs synchronously with colorectal cancer (CRC).AimsThe aim of the present study was to assess the value of colonoscopy in patients with primariy early gastric cancer (EGC) indicated for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and to identify predictors for the risk of high-risk adenomas.MethodsA total of 130 patients with EGC, who underwent both colonoscopy and gastric ESD, and 260 controls matched for age and sex, who underwent a colonoscopy as part of our institutional health check-up program.The prevalence of high-risk adenomas in EGC patients vs. controls was evaluated.ResultsHigh-risk adenomas were found in 43 (33%) EGC patients and 37 (14%) controls (P < 0.01). Multivariate analysis showed the presence of EGC was significantly associated with high-risk adenoma [odds ratio (OR) 2.8, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.7–4.9]. Among EGC patients, high serum CEA level (OR 2.4, 95% CI: 1.2–5.0) was an independent predictor for high-risk adenoma.ConclusionsPatients with EGC had a significant risk for colorectal cancer. When endoscopists detected an early gastric cancer indicated for ESD, colonoscopy should be considered for EGC patients with high serum CEA levels.     

Is there a role for sigmoidoscopy in symptomatic patients? Analysis of a study correlating distal and proximal colonic neoplasias detected by colonoscopy in a symptomatic population

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy is the gold standard exam to investigate patients with colonic complaints. However, its availability is limited in developing countries. Sigmoidoscopy has been advocated as a first procedure in colorectal cancer screening strategies, in order to select those who need colonoscopy. AIM: To study the correlation between distal and proximal colonic neoplasias in symptomatic patients 50 years or older and patients 40 to 49 years old who underwent colonoscopy at a gastrointestinal endoscopy unit in 1999 and 2000 with the purpose to evaluate its role in a symptomatic population. METHODS: All colonoscopies performed in our Department in 1999-2000 were reviewed. The distal colon was defined as the colonic segment aboral to the splenic flexure. Advanced neoplasias were defined as adenomas larger than 10 millimeters and adenocarcinomas. RESULTS: Of the 2,701 colonoscopies retrieved, 1,125 were enrolled in this study. Prevalence rates for adenoma, advanced adenoma and carcinoma were 28.9%, 4.6% and 4% in the group of 830 patients 50 years or older (mean age 65 years, 491 women). The finding of one small (<10 mm) adenoma in the distal bowel doubled the likelihood of finding a proximal neoplasia (OR = 2.12, 95% CI, 1.27-3.54), and multiple (OR = 3.99, 95% CI, 1.72-9.28) or advanced (OR = 3.73, 95% CI, 1.81-7.7) adenomas increased this risk even further. Of the patients without adenoma or carcinoma in the distal colon, 1.93% had proximal advanced neoplasia. In the group of 40 to 49-year-old patients (n = 395; mean age 44.8 years, 208 women) the prevalence of adenomas (14.9%), advanced adenomas (3.4%), and carcinomas (1.7%) was lower. CONCLUSIONS: The likelihood of finding a proximal lesion is greater in patients with distal neoplasias. This likelihood is further increased when adenomas are multiple or larger than 10 mm. One out of 52 patients 50 years or older with an apparently normal distal colon has advanced proximal neoplasia. Sigmoidoscopy is not an adequate exam for symptomatic patients aged 50 years or older.     

Risk of colorectal adenomas in patients with a family history of colorectal cancer: some implications for screening programmes.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Most colorectal cancers (CRC) arise in colorectal adenomas. A case-control study was conducted to see whether a family history of CRC is associated with a higher prevalence of colorectal adenomas. SUBJECTS: Subjects were drawn from all patients who underwent colonoscopy at the Royal Brisbane Hospital between 1980-1982 and 1985, and included 141 cases with colorectal adenomas diagnosed at colonoscopy and 882 controls who were free of polyps at colonoscopy. METHODS: The prevalence of family history of CRC was compared between patients with adenomas and negative colonoscopy controls. RESULTS: Overall, patients with one first degree relative with CRC were at no greater risk for adenomas at colonoscopy than patients with no family history (odds ratio (OR) = 0.8, 95% confidence intervals (CI) = 0.4, 1.5). Patients with two or more affected first degree relatives had a more than doubled risk for adenomas (OR = 2.3, 95% CI = 0.5, 8.2), and were also more likely to carry moderately or severely dysplastic adenomas (OR = 14.1, 95% CI = 2.0, 62.9). CONCLUSIONS: These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that some families, in addition to those with familial adenomatous polyposis, have an increased susceptibility to develop colorectal adenomas, and that adenomas in such families may have a greater tendency to undergo malignant transformation.     

Predictors of advanced proximal neoplasia in persons with abnormal screening flexible sigmoidoscopy.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The relationship between distal and proximal colonic findings is uncertain. Thus, there is no consensus on which findings on screening flexible sigmoidoscopy should trigger colonoscopy. METHODS: We analyzed data from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial to assess the relationship between distal and proximal colonic findings. RESULTS: A total of 8802 subjects had an abnormal baseline sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy follow-up. Subjects with <10-mm single or multiple tubular adenomas had similar risks for advanced proximal neoplasia as subjects with hyperplastic polyps or other benign lesions (3%-5%). Subjects with large (>or=10 mm), villous, or severely dysplastic distal adenomas had similarly elevated risks for advanced proximal neoplasia (11%-12%). Multivariate logistic modeling showed a significantly increased risk for advanced proximal neoplasia associated with the presence of a large tubular (odds ratio [OR], 2.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0-3.4) or villous distal adenoma (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 2.1-3.5) but not with the presence of one (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.8-1.3) or multiple (OR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.5-1.2) <10-mm tubular distal adenomas. CONCLUSIONS: Among subjects with a polypoid lesion on screening flexible sigmoidoscopy, those with small tubular distal adenomas are at similar risk for advanced proximal neoplasia as those without distal adenomas. Subjects with a large, villous, or dysplastic distal adenoma are at increased risk. A strategy that encourages individuals with small tubular adenomas on sigmoidoscopy to undergo follow-up colonoscopy and excludes those with nonadenomatous lesions is of questionable validity, because both groups are at similar risk for advanced proximal neoplasia.     

Incidence and recurrence rates of colorectal adenomas in first-degree asymptomatic relatives of patients with colon cancer

OBJECTIVES: Subjects with one first-degree relative affected with colorectal cancer are considered to be at increased risk of colorectal adenomas. We compared the recurrence and incidence rates of colorectal adenomas among subjects with one first-degree relative with colorectal cancer and those without family history. METHODS: A series of consecutive asymptomatic subjects successfully underwent a colonoscopy, were found to have either normal results or at least one adenoma, provided a detailed family history, and were offered a second colonoscopy 3 yr later; 190 out of 436 subjects accepted, 134/172 with one or more adenomas and 56/264 with no abnormalities at the initial examination. A first-degree family history was reported by 43/134 and 26/56, respectively. RESULTS: By multivariate analysis, the presence of adenomas at follow-up examination was significantly associated with a positive family history of colorectal cancer in both subgroups, those with a previously resected adenoma (odds ratio = 2.23, 95% CI = 1.04-4.79) and those without (odds ratio = 8.95, CI = 1.29-62.22). CONCLUSION: A history of one first-degree relative with colorectal cancer is associated with a significant increase in 3-yr cumulative incidence and recurrence rates of adenomas.     

New occurrence and recurrence of neoplasms within 5 years of a screening colonoscopy

OBJECTIVE: The fear that colorectal adenomas were missed on initial colonoscopy or that new adenomas have developed is often a rationale for repeating a colonoscopic examination. The aim of this study was to delineate risk factors associated with recurrence of colorectal adenomas after an initial baseline screening colonoscopy. METHODS: The study population comprised 875 subjects who underwent a baseline screening colonoscopy followed by a second examination 1-5 yr later. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess the influence of potential risk factors on the occurrence or recurrence of colorectal adenomas, the strength of the influence being expressed as an OR with a 95% CI. RESULTS: Colorectal adenomas were detected in 484 of all patients (55%) at baseline colonoscopy. Within a 1- to 5-yr time interval, 181 patients (37%) had recurrent adenomas (adenomas were removed during the first colonoscopy) and 73 patients (19%) had newly developed adenomas (adenomas were absent on the first colonoscopy). The occurrence of adenomas at baseline screening colonoscopy was the only factor associated with an increased risk for the recurrence of adenomas at follow-up (OR = 2.51, 95% CI = 1.77-3.55). Recurrence was associated with multiple baseline adenomas (4.45, 2.98-6.64) and baseline adenomas larger than 1 cm (2.62, 1.99-3.11). Recurrence was not associated with histology type or family history of colorectal cancer. There was a significant trend for adenomas to recur in the same proximal or distal segment as the baseline adenomas (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Colon adenomas tend to recur with greater frequency if the adenomas removed at baseline were either large or multiple. Although patients with large adenomas or multiple adenomas at baseline screening colonoscopy are at a 2.6- to 4.5-fold risk for recurrence of adenomas, the rate of de novo adenoma formation in patients without baseline adenomas may be large enough to warrant repeat colonoscopy at some time in the future. The exact timing of the follow-up colonoscopy needs to be determined.     

Excessive alcohol consumption favours high risk polyp or colorectal cancer occurrence among patients with adenomas: a case control study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Excessive alcohol consumption is a risk factor for developing colorectal adenomas. This study aimed to investigate the influence of excessive alcohol consumption on the occurrence of high risk polyps (adenoma > or = 10 mm, villous component, high grade dysplasia) or colorectal cancer among patients with at least one colonic adenoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three groups of patients with at least one colorectal adenoma were included in a case control study: 401 heavy drinkers (group HD, mean daily alcohol intake 117 (SD 4) g/day for a mean duration of 22 (SD 0.6) years), aged 57 (0.5) years (78% men); 152 patients suffering from irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), aged 61 (0.9) years (57% male); and 108 patients with a family history (FH) of colorectal adenoma or cancer, aged 55 (1) years (64% male). Exclusion criteria were: anaemia, haematochezia, personal history of colorectal adenoma or cancer, and for groups HD and IBS a family history of colorectal adenoma and/or cancer. Relative risks were estimated by the odds ratio (OR) using a logistic regression model and were expressed with 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: After age and sex adjustment, the likelihood of having an adenoma > or = 10 mm was higher in group HD than in the IBS group (OR 1.8, 95% CI (1.2-2.7)) and the likelihood of having high risk adenomas or cancer was higher in group HD compared with the IBS group (OR 1.6, 95% CI (1.2-2.1)) and the FH group although this was not significant (OR 1.6, 95% CI (0.97-2.6) (p=0.081); 90% CI (1.03-2.4)). After age and sex adjustment, the likelihood of having an adenoma with high grade dysplasia or cancer was higher in group HD than in the IBS group (OR 1.7, 95% CI (1.02-2.8)) or group FH, although this was not significant (OR 3.7, 95% CI (0.98-15) (p=0.076); 90% CI (1.10-12.47)). CONCLUSION: In patients with at least one colorectal adenoma, excessive alcohol consumption increases the likelihood of developing high risk adenomas or colorectal cancer.     

Rectal aberrant crypt foci identified using high-magnification-chromoscopic colonoscopy: biomarkers for flat and depressed neoplasia

BACKGROUND: Aberrant crypt foci may represent preneoplastic lesions in the human colon. The prevalence of aberrant crypt foci detected using magnification chromoscopic colonoscopy is known to follow a stepwise progression from normal subjects to those with exophytic adenomas and colon cancer. No studies have addressed the prevalence of rectal aberrant crypt foci in patients with flat and depressed colonic lesions that cluster within the right hemi-colon and may undergo de novo neoplastic transformation. METHODS: All patients underwent total colonoscopy by a single endoscopist using the Olympus CF240Z magnifying colonoscope. Flat and depressed lesions were diagnosed using targeted indigo carmine chromoscopy. Prior to extubation, pan high-magnification-chromoscopy using indigo carmine was applied to the rectum and the distal 10 cm of mucosa examined using forward and retroflexed views. Aberrant crypt foci were defined as two or more crypts with dilated or slit-like openings that were raised above the adjacent mucosa. Using high-magnification chromoscopic colonoscopy we assessed the prevalence and dysplastic features of aberrant crypt foci in three groups: endoscopically "normal" subjects, patients with flat/depressed adenoma, and flat/depressed cancer. RESULTS: Two thousand five hundred and fifty-nine patients underwent colonoscopy of which 1,000 were eligible for inclusion. The median number of aberrant crypt foci per patient in the endoscopically normal, adenoma, and cancer group was 1 (range: 0-5), 9 (range: 0-22), and 38 (range: 14-64), respectively. The estimated relative risk of dysplastic aberrant crypt foci when comparing the flat adenoma group with the endoscopically "normal" group was 4.68 (95% CI: 2.23-9.91) with the relative risk for flat cancer versus endoscopically normal group being 21.8 (95% CI: 10.9-23.8). Patients with >5 flat adenomas had higher crypt foci densities than those with <5 adenomas (r=0.53; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The number of aberrant crypt foci in normal patients, patients with flat adenoma, and flat cancer follow a stepwise incremental change as previously observed for exophytic adenomas and cancer. Detection of aberrant crypt foci in the rectum may be a useful biomarker for proximal colonic flat neoplasia and could be used at index flexible sigmoidoscopic screening to stratify risk of proximal colonic neoplasia. Patients with dysplastic aberrant crypt foci of high density should receive total colonoscopy.     

Prevalence and risk of colorectal polyps among the Korean population under 50 years

Colorectal cancer is a common cancer; generally, adults aged ≥ 50 years are screened using stool occult blood tests and colonoscopy. However, colorectal adenoma and cancer have been found in patients under the aged of 50, and studies on characteristics and risk factors in young patients are lacking. We evaluated the prevalence and risk factors of colorectal adenoma and cancer in young adults aged under 50 years.We retrospectively analyzed 570 individuals aged under 50 years who underwent colonoscopy at the Haeundae Paik Hospital, Korea, from January to June 2018. Logistic regression model was used to identify the risk factors for colorectal adenoma and colorectal cancer.The prevalence of colorectal adenoma in group of 19–29 years was 3.2% (1 of 31), 30–39 years was 13.8% (30 of 217) and in the group of 40–49 years was 21.1% (68 of 322) (P = .009). In multivariable analysis, age over 45 years (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.941; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.187–3.172; P = .008) and male sex (adjusted OR, 1.711; 95% CI, 1.044–2.806; P = .033) were independent risk factors for colorectal neoplasia including cancer.The prevalence of colorectal adenoma increases as the age increased in young adults under 50 years of age, especially after the age of 45 years, the risk of colorectal neoplasia increases; hence, early screening should be considered before the age of 50 years.     

Faecal calprotectin levels in a high risk population for colorectal neoplasia

BACKGROUND: Faecal concentrations of the protein calprotectin have been found to be elevated in patients with colorectal neoplasia, suggesting that it might be used as a screening tool for colorectal cancer as well as adenomas. AIMS: To measure the sensitivity and specificity of faecal calprotectin for the detection of adenomas in high risk individuals undergoing colonoscopy. Also, to investigate between and within stool variability of calprotectin concentrations. SUBJECTS: A total of 814 patients planned for colonoscopy were included for the following indications: positive faecal occult blood test, 25; neoplasia surveillance, 605; newly detected polyp, 130; and family risk, 54. METHODS: Two faecal samples from each of two stools were analysed using the PhiCal ELISA test device (Nycomed Pharma AS). RESULTS: Adenoma patients had significantly higher calprotectin levels than normal subjects (median 9.1 (95% confidence interval 7.5-10.1) v 6.6 (5.6-7.4)mg/l). There was no significant decrease in calprotectin levels after polypectomy. Levels in cancer patients were significantly higher than those in all other subgroups (median 17.6 mg/l (11.5-31.0)). With a cut off limit of 10 mg/l, the sensitivity for cancer was 74% and for adenoma 43%. Corresponding specificity values were 64% for no cancer and 67% for no neoplasia (cancer+adenoma). Specificity varied from 71% for one stool sample to 63% for four samples. Stool variability was small, suggesting that two spots from one stool were as discriminative as two spots from each of two stools. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity and specificity of faecal calprotectin levels as a marker for colorectal adenoma and carcinoma justifies its use in high risk groups, but specificity is too low for screening of average risk persons. Lack of a decrease in levels after polypectomy may be due to a more widespread leucocyte migration into the intestinal lumen than that at the polyp site, and needs further investigation.     

Prevalence and risk of colorectal neoplasia in consumers of alcohol in a screening population

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although studies suggest a positive association between alcohol consumption and risk for colorectal neoplasia, the impact on screening has not been fully examined. It is also unclear whether all types of alcohol are associated with an increased risk. We performed a cross-sectional study to examine the impact of regular alcohol consumption on the detection of significant colorectal neoplasia in a screening population. METHODS: Data collected for 2,291 patients presenting for screening colonoscopy: known risk factors for colorectal neoplasia and alcohol drinking pattern. Our outcome was the endoscopic detection of significant colorectal neoplasia, which included adenocarcinoma, high-grade dysplasia, villous tissue, adenomas 1 cm or greater and multiple (>2) adenomas of any size. RESULTS: When compared to abstainers, we found an increased risk for significant neoplasia in those patients who consumed more than eight drinks of spirits alcohol (26.3%; OR = 2.53; 95% CI = 1.10-4.28; p < 0.01) and those who drank more than eight servings of beer per week (21.7%; OR = 2.43; 95% CI = 1.11-5.32; p= 0.02). Consuming one to eight glasses of wine per week was associated with a decreased risk for significant neoplasia (OR = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.34-0.87; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: While there was a more than twofold increased risk of significant colorectal neoplasia in people who drink spirits and beer, people who drank wine had a lower risk. In our sample, people who drank more than eight servings of beer or spirits per week had at least a one in five chance of having significant colorectal neoplasia detected by screening colonoscopy.     

High frequency of colorectal neoplasia in patients with sporadic adenomas or adenocarcinomas of the papilla of Vater: The same adenoma-carcinoma sequence?

BackgroundData on the frequency of colorectal neoplasia in sporadic ampullary tumors remains scarce.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 135 patients undergoing endoscopic ampullectomy from January 2018 to July 2021, and identified 95 patients with sporadic ampullary adenoma who underwent total colonoscopy. Colonoscopy findings were compared with 380 asymptomatic controls using the chi-squared test. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed on one patient with synchronous adenomas of the ampulla of Vater and ascending colon.ResultsColorectal polyps were present in 60% of Cases vs. 34.7% of Controls (P = 0.001), advanced adenoma in 20% vs. 5.5%, and adenocarcinoma in 4.2% vs. 0.8%. Cases tended to have larger polyps than Controls (P<0.001), while there was no difference in polyp location and histology between the two groups. The odds ratio of all the colorectal lesions, advanced colorectal adenoma and adenocarcinoma in Cases was 1.7, 4.2, and 4, respectively. WES in one patient revealed that both of ampullary adenoma and colonic adenoma shared somatic ABCB1 mutation.ConclusionsThe frequency of colorectal polyps or neoplasia was significantly higher in Cases than Controls. We proposed that ampullary neoplasia is analogous to colon lesions and warrants total colonoscopy screening in patients diagnosed with ampullary tumors.