Accuracy and precision of bone mineral density and bone mineral content in excised rat humeri using fan beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

The aim of this study was the evaluation of fan beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for measuring bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content (BMC) of isolated rat humeri. Defleshed rat humeri from male Lewis rats were examined with a Hologic QDR 4500 A (Hologic, Inc., Bedford, MA) high-resolution densitometer both in water and 0.9% saline solution. The small animal scan protocol with the regional high-resolution mode was used. BMC measured by DXA was compared with bone dry weight, ash weight, and bone calcium content. Furthermore, DXA BMD and BMC precision were determined. We also evaluated the effect of salinity of the water bath in which the bones were measured. Correlations (r(2)) of BMC, as determined by DXA with dry weight, ash weight, and bone calcium content, were 0.978, 0.988, and 0.890, respectively. DXA overestimated ash weight by 5%-9%. Precision errors for BMC (BMD) were 0.90% (0.76%) without and 1.3 (0.86) with repositioning. Changes in the salinity of the water bath had a significant influence on the DXA results: At the 0.9% physiological level, BMC (-4.4%) and area (-4.1%), but not BMD, values were significantly lower (p < 0.005) compared with measurements in tap water. Fan beam DXA is a highly accurate and precise technique for measuring BMC and BMD in excised small animal bones. A physiological saline concentration in the water bath had a significant impact on BMC and area, but not on BMD, and should therefore be strictly controlled to avoid an underestimation of BMC.     

Anomalies in the Measurement of Changes in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine by Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is frequently used for longitudinal studies of bone mineral status because of the high precision obtained, but evidence is emerging that the accuracy of measurements of changes may be a limitation because of artefacts of the analysis procedure, in particular, a dependence of the measured bone area (BA) on the bone mineral content (BMC). Results of spine bone mineral measurements taken at intervals with two DXA scanners, a Hologic QDR 1000W, and a Norland XR 26 HS, were examined. There was a consistent correlation between changes in BA and in BMC, with a slope of approximately 0.25 when expressed as percentages. A real change of BA of the magnitude observed is not feasible. There were no differences among the correlations for different instruments, genders, ages, or weight changes. There would appear to be an underestimation of changes in bone mineral density (BMD), but there is a possibility that some of the anomaly is manifested as an overestimation of a change in BMC. Phantom measurements were undertaken with the DXA scanners mentioned above and with a Lunar DPX. The phantoms consisted of simulations of the spine cut from aluminium sheet, so that the effective BMD could be varied. The dependence of the measured BA on BMC varied with the phantom outline, particularly the thickness of the transverse processes. Evidence was obtained of both an underestimate of BMD changes and an overestimate of BMC changes. There are errors in measuring spine changes, but these do not seem to be as serious as a previous report suggests for the Hologic scanner and are not likely to lead to misinterpretation of results. Received: 17 June 1997 / Accepted: 23 January 1998     

Centile Curves for Bone Densitometry Measurements in Healthy Males and Females Ages 5–22 Yr

Normative pediatric bone measurement data are necessary for defining osteopenia in children and for identifying factors associated with normal bone growth. The LMS statistical method is used to produce centile curves plotting a growth characteristic as a function of age. The purpose of this study was to provide centile curves of bone measurements using peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) and dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in 231 (107 male) healthy individuals ages 5 22 yr using the LMS method. pQCT (Norland XCT 2000; Norland, Ft. Atkinson, WI) was used to image a single slice at the 20% distal tibia. Periosteal circumference, endosteal circumference, and cortical density measurements were used to obtain centile curves. Whole-body DXA (Hologic QDR 4500; Hologic, Bedford, MA) was obtained and scans were analyzed using adult whole-body software for total body bone mineral content (BMC) and total body bone area. pQCT measurements showed prepubertal expansion of the tibia that plateaued in females at age 14 and continued in males until age 18. Tibia cortical density increased during the age of puberty more gradually in females than in males. DXA measurement curves showed that total body BMC and total body bone area plateaued in females at approximately age 15, whereas male curves of the same measurements showed a continued increase.     

Magnification error of femoral geometry using fan beam densitometers

Hip axis length (HAL) has been reported as an independent risk factor for hip fracture. DEXA machines using fan beam techniques have become increasingly available. Errors in calculated hip axis length may be expected because of different degrees of magnification by the fan beam. The magnitude of this error on measurement of hip geometry was studied, using an anthropomorphic femur phantom with both fan beam (Lunar Expert and Hologic QDR-2000) and pencil beam (Lunar DPXL) densitometers. The clinical relevance of these findings was also examined using patient measurements of buttock soft tissue thickness. Femoral neck axis length (FNAL), which correlates well with HAL, was used as a measurement of hip geometry. There was a linear increase or decrease of FNAL with increasing distance of the phantom above the scanning table, when measured with the Lunar Expert or Hologic QDR-2000, respectively. There was no significant difference in FNAL at different heights using the pencil beam densitometer. The maximal difference in buttock soft tissue thickness in 30 women studied was 8.7 cm. From the equations, derived from the phantom studies, this difference would result in an 8.2% (1.4 SD) increase, or an 11.4% (1.9 SD) decrease in FNAL in the largest woman as compared with the smallest woman when measured using the Lunar Expert or Hologic QDR-2000, respectively. We conclude that there may be unpredictable degrees of magnification of FNAL in vivo, caused by differences in buttock thickness, when measured using a fan beam densitometers. Until these problems are resolved. FNAL, or related parameters of femoral geometry, should be measured using pencil beam instruments. Received: 22 January 1996/Accepted: 3 May 1996     

Ex vivo bone mineral density of the wrist: influence of medullar fat

The cone beam technology was recently proposed in a third generation of densitometers (dual photon X-ray absorptiometry, DXA such as the Lexxos densitometer). Because fat is a well-known problem with DXA, we have designed a cadaver study to compare the influence of medullary lipids on the measures performed with the Hologic QDR4500 and the Lexxos. Twenty-three human distal radii were obtained and analyzed in parallel on both densitometers; bone mineral density (BMD) was measured at the distal radius with standard softwares and on a standardized square regions of interest (ROI). Bones were then defatted and a new series of measurement was performed. Bones were then thoroughly dried and a cube was prepared at the distal radius with a banding saw. Trabecular and total bone volumes were measured by microcomputerized tomography. Ash eight was obtained after calcination of the blocks. BMD could be measured on the Lexxos before and after delipidation but this was not possible with the QDR4500. The X-ray image quality was better with the Lexxos. Delipidation had a very significant effect on measurements: after defatting, BMD values were considerably reduced (−49.8 ± 19.4%). BMD before/after defatting were significantly correlated (r = 0.81, P < 0.0001) but bone mass appeared to reflect 66% of the variance. BMD was significantly correlated with BV/TV after defatting (r = 0.44, P < 0.03) but the correlation improved when cortices were taken into account (r = 0.70, P < 0.0001). Ash weight was significantly correlated with BMD and total bone volume (respectively, r = 0.84, P < 0.0001; r = 0.53, P < 0.03), but not with BV/TV. BMD at the distal radius is influenced by marrow fat and cortical density.     

Bone Mineral Measurements: A Comparison of Delayed Gamma Neutron Activation, Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry and Direct Chemical Analysis

A system in vitro consisting of a femur from a cadaver and soft-tissue equivalent material was used to test the agreement between several techniques for measuring bone mineral. Calcium values measured by delayed gamma neutron activation (DGNA) and bone mineral content (BMC) by Lunar, Hologic and Norland dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers (DXA) were compared with calcium and ash content determined by direct chemical analysis. To assess the effect of soft-tissue thickness on measurements of bone mineral, we had three phantom configurations ranging from 15.0 to 26.0 cm in thickness, achieved by using soft-tissue equivalent overlays. Chemical analysis of the femur gave calcium and ash content values of 61.83 g ± 0.51g and 154.120 ± 0.004 g, respectively. Calcium measured by DGNA did not differ from the ashed amount of calcium at any of the phantom configurations. The BMC measured by DXA was significantly higher, by 3–5%, than the amount determined by chemical analysis for the Lunar densitometer and significantly lower, by 3–6%, for the Norland densitometer (p<0.001–0.024), but only 1% lower (not significant) for the Hologic densitometer. DXA instruments showed a decreasing trend in BMC as the thickness increased from 20.5 to 26.0 cm (p<0.05). However, within the entire thickness range (15.0–26.0 cm), the overall influence of thickness on BMC by DXA was very small. These findings offer insight into the differences in these currently available methods for bone mineral measurement and challenge the comparability of different methods. Received: 27 July 1998 / Accepted: 9 January 1999     

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry,peripheral quantitative computed tomography,and micro-computed tomography techniques are discordant for bone density and geometry measurements in the guinea pig

This study aims to examine agreement among bone mineral content (BMC) and density (BMD) estimates obtained using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT), and micro-computed tomography (μCT) against high-resolution μCT and bone ash of the guinea pig femur. Middle-aged (n = 40, 86 weeks) male guinea pigs underwent in vivo followed by ex vivo DXA (Hologic QDR 4500A) scanning for intact and excised femur BMC and areal density. To assess bone architecture and strength, excised femurs were scanned on pQCT (Stratec XCT 2000L) as well as on two μCT scanners (LaTheta LCT-200; Skyscan 1174), followed by three-point bending test. Reproducibility was determined using triplicate scans; and agreement assessed using Bland–Altman plots with reference methods being high-resolution μCT (Skyscan) for BMD and bone ashing for BMC. All techniques showed satisfactory ex vivo precision (CV 0.05–4.3 %). However, bias compared to the reference method was highest (207.5 %) in trabecular bone volume fraction (BV/TV) measured by LaTheta, and unacceptable in most total femur and cortical bone measurements. Volumetric BMD (vBMD) and BV/TV derived by LaTheta and pQCT at the distal metaphysis were biased from the Skyscan by an average of 49.3 and 207.5 %, respectively. Variability of vBMD, BV/TV and cross-sectional area at the diaphysis ranged from ?5.5 to 30.8 %. LaTheta best quantified total femur BMC with an upper bias of 3.3 %. The observed differences among imaging techniques can be attributable to inherent dissimilarity in construction design, calibration, segmentation and scanning resolution used. These bone imaging tools are precise but are not comparable, at least when assessing guinea pig bones.     

Reproducibility of DXA in obese women.

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements were analyzed using two versions of software (Hologic V8.1a and V8.21) to compare the short- and long-term precisions of the measurements. Software V8.21 was designed by the manufacturer to better address magnification effects on estimations of soft tissue lean mass. Twenty weight-stable, obese postmenopausal Caucasian women aged 40-70 yr participated in the study. Total and regional body composition measurements were obtained at baseline and after 3 mo, using a fan beam Hologic QDR 4500A absorptiometer. For the estimation of precision, duplicate scans obtained on the same day for nine women were analyzed using both versions of the software. The correlations between duplicate scans ranged from 0.886 to 0.998 and were similar between software versions. The CVs for fat and lean weights and bone mineral content (BMC) were 1.2%, 1.1%, and 1.7%, respectively, for software V8.21 compared to 1.3%, 1.3%, and 2.1%, respectively, for V8.1a. Systematic differences were found between software versions with higher values for fat and lean weights for software version V8.21. The 3-mo, long-term reproducibility of body composition estimates from DXA was only slightly less than short-term reproducibility for both software versions (coefficient of variation [CV] range from 1.3% for BMC weight to 11.0% for arm fat). Software V8.21 yielded smaller percentage mean differences between scale and DXA-estimated weights (-2.4% and -7.2% at baseline and -2.9% and -7.6% at 3 mo, respectively) and higher fat and lean weights (49.12 and 47.1 kg and 49.6 and 44.6 kg, respectively) than V8.1a. Reproducibility of all variables was comparable between software versions.     

Validation of peripheral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the measurement of bone mineral in intact and excised long bones of rats.

We evaluated the precision and accuracy of peripheral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for the measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content (BMC) in intact and excised femurs and tibias from rats. Thirty-one Sprague-Dawley rats (18F/13M; 114-360 g) were used in the study. Precision and accuracy were determined in 23 rats and prediction equations were evaluated in an independent sample of 8 animals. Precision was determined by measuring the right hindquarter three times with repositioning between scans. The femur and tibia were then excised, cleaned, and scanned in triplicate, with repositioning. CVs ranged from 0.66 to 2.24%. Accuracy of BMC was determined by comparison to bone ash values. BMC values for the intact and excised femur significantly overestimated bone ash (p < 0.001) by 33% and 5.5%, respectively. BMC for the intact tibia overestimated ash by 37% (p < 0.001), whereas BMC for the excised tibia underestimated ash by 1% (p < 0.05). However, BMC and bone ash were highly related for both bones, whether BMC was measured in the intact animal or after excision (r2 > 0.99). Cross-validation of prediction equations in an independent sample showed that there were no significant differences between predicted ash (based on BMC from DXA) and measured bone ash. These results suggest the peripheral DXA is a useful tool for measuring intact and excised rat leg bones.     

Regional bone mass measurement from whole-body dual energy X-ray absorptiometry scan.

There are no data on the relative accuracy and precision of regional bone mass measurement from whole-body dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans in small young subjects. Twelve domestic swine piglets (2550-17,660 g) were scanned on a single-beam and on a fan beam densitometer using each humerus and femur as the region of interest to determine the validity of five different scan modes: two infant whole body (IWB), two spine, and one rat whole body (RWB) scan mode in the determination of regional bone mass measurements. DXA bone mineral content (BMC( measurements from RWB and IWB fan beam and IWB single-beam scans were highly predictive of ash weight (adjusted r2 = 0.98, 0.94, 0.94, respectively). Correlation between left and right limbs was highly significant (p < 0.001 for all comparisons) for ash weight (r = 0.99) and for DXA measurements of BMC (r = 0.92-0.99), area (r = 0.92-0.99), and bone mineral density (r = 0.87-0.99) for all modes of DXA scan. Repeatability (as standard deviation of differences of repeated scans) varied with scan mode and DXA parameters and ranged from 1.5 to 7.6%and from 1.8 to 14.7% for intra-and interoperator, respectively. We conclude that regional DXA measurements from IWB and RWB scans can be assessed accurately and with adequate precision for clinical use in subjects with low bone mass comparable with infants and young children. The RWB scan is useful for research studies. However, appropriate training and documentation of precision errors is needed to minimize repeatability errors.     

Population Bone Mineral Density Measurements for Chinese Women and Men in Hong Kong

The aim of the study was to establish population ranges of bone mineral density (BMD) for Hong Kong Chinese men and women for the Hologic QDR 2000 bone densitometer, to compare these values with the manufacturer’s reference ranges, to compare these values with population ranges for women obtained for the Norland X26 bone densitometer, and to examine variations between the two densitometers. The subjects were 164 men aged 40–79 years and 436 women aged 20–89 years, who were all ethnic Chinese, recruited from volunteers, social centers for the elderly and general practice clinics. BMD in women began to decline rapidly between ages 50 and 79 years, averaging about 10% loss per decade from the young adult (20–29 years) mean. The percentage losses from young adult mean values in the spine, femroal neck, trochanter and total femur were 23%, 30%, 31% and 33%, respectively, from 20 to 79 years. In the ninth decade no further decrease in BMD occurred with the exception of a further 4% at the hip sites. In men, no decrease in spine BMD occurred between 40 and 70 years. Compared with BMD in the fourth decade, 10%, 13%, and 11% of BMD was lost at the femoral neck, trochanter and total femur, respectively, by the seventh decade. These values show differences compared with the manufacturer’s reference ranges for Caucasians and Japanese. BMD values for the spine were comparable between Hologic and Norland densitometers, but Hologic values for femoral neck and trochanteric regions were lower than the Norland values. Data provided by this study may thus be used as normative values for the Hologic QDR2000 bone densitometer, instead of values provided by the manufacturer. BMD values at the hip sites are not interchangeable between Norland and Hologic bone densitometers, and estimation of numbers of the population with osteoporosis will depend on the model of densitometer used. Received: 31 May 2000 / Accepted: 31 October 2000     

Interpretation of whole body dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measures in children: comparison with peripheral quantitative computed tomography

The assessment of bone health in children requires strategies to minimize the confounding effects of bone size on dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) areal bone mineral density (BMD) results. Cortical bone composes 80% of the total skeletal bone mass. The objective of this study was to develop analytic strategies for the assessment of whole body DXA that describe the biomechanical characteristics of cortical bone across a wide range of body sizes using peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) measures of cortical geometry, density (mg/mm³), and strength as the gold standard. Whole body DXA (Hologic QDR 4500) and pQCT (Stratec XCT-2000) of the tibia diaphysis were completed in 150 healthy children 6–21 years of age. To assess DXA and pQCT measures relative to age, body size, and bone size, gender-specific regression models were used to establish z scores for DXA bone mineral content (BMC) for age, areal BMD for age, bone area for height, bone area for lean mass, BMC for height, BMC for lean mass, and BMC for bone area; and for pQCT, bone cross-sectional area (CSA) for tibia length and bone strength (stress-strain index, SSI) for tibia length. DXA bone area for height and BMC for height were both strongly and positively associated with pQCT CSA for length and with SSI for length (all P < 0.0001), suggesting that decreases in DXA bone area for height or DXA BMC for height represent narrower bones with less resistance to bending. DXA BMC for age (P < 0.01) and areal BMD (P < 0.05) for age were moderately correlated with strength. Neither DXA bone area for lean mass nor BMC for lean mass correlated with pQCT CSA for length or SSI for length. DXA BMC for bone area was weakly associated with pQCT SSI for length, in females only. Therefore, normalizing whole body DXA bone area for height and BMC for height provided the best measures of bone dimensions and strength. DXA BMC normalized for bone area and lean mass were poor indicators of bone strength.     

Effect of bone strontium on BMD measurements.

Strontium ranelate is a new treatment for osteoporosis that is of interest for, among other reasons, its unusual effect on measurements of bone mineral density (BMD). When some of the calcium in bone is replaced by strontium, X-ray absorptiometry measurements of BMD are overestimated because strontium attenuates X-rays more strongly than calcium. In this study, we report the first theoretical estimation of this effect for measurements made using axial (spine and hip) dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), peripheral DXA (pDXA), and single-energy quantitative computed tomography (SEQCT). Tables of X-ray attenuation coefficients were used to calculate values of the strontium ratio defined as the ratio of the percentage overestimation of BMD to the molar percentage of strontium (%Sr/[Ca+Sr]) in bone. For DXA measurements, the theoretical value of the strontium ratio increased slightly with increasing effective photon energy of the X-ray beam with figures of 9.0 for Osteometer DTX200 and G4 pDXA devices (Osteometer Meditech Inc., Hawthorne, CA), 10.0 for GE-Lunar DPX and Prodigy DXA systems (GE-Lunar, Madison, WI), 10.4 for Hologic QDR1000 and QDR2000, and 10.8 for Hologic QDR4500 and Discovery (Hologic Inc., Bedford, MA). Results for SEQCT also varied with the effective photon energy with strontium ratios of 6.2 at 60 keV and 4.4 at 80 keV. The results of the theoretical study are in good agreement with the experimental value of 10 reported by Pors Nielsen and colleagues for a variety of different axial DXA systems. A reliable figure for the strontium ratio is important for adjusting BMD measurements in strontium ranelate treated patients for the effect of bone strontium content. This latter correction will be required for the interpretation of future DXA scans in patients who have discontinued strontium ranelate treatment.     

Bone mineral measurements in mice: comparison of two devices.

Animal models are widely used to explore the pathogenesis and management of osteoporosis. Mice are increasingly being used in animal models. We have evaluated the precision, accuracy, and ability to monitor changes in bone mineral measurements of mice with the Piximus and Hologic QDR 2000 devices. One hundred and twenty-two C57/BL6 mice were used in this study; 70 of them were put on a low calcium diet and followed prospectively for 14 wk. They were measured using both devices at baseline and at wk 14. Using the Piximus, we measured the whole body, the tibia, and two caudal vertebrae. Using the Hologic, we measured the tibia, which we divided into three equal parts. The remaining mice were used to evaluate the precision and accuracy of the measurement. The accuracy, which was determined only for the Hologic device, revealed a mean difference between the in vivo bone mineral content (BMC) and the ash weight of 0.1 mg. The precision, evaluated from the coefficient of variation (%) and the Smallest Detectable Difference (SDD, in absolute values) was good for both devices, confirming their ability to detect small differences in longitudinal studies: as little as 0.004 g for the BMC of the total tibia on both devices, and 0.003 g/cm2 for whole body bone mineral density (BMD) on the Piximus. The BMC found using the two devices was comparable, whereas the BMD obtained on the Hologic device was nearly double that found using the Piximus. The comparison of the results by Bland and Altman's method showed that the difference between the results was not dependent on the magnitude of the measurement. We concluded that bone density and bone-density changes in mice can be measured precisely in vivo using the Hologic and Piximus devices; the latter being able to measure the whole body BMD with good precision.     

Cross-calibration of DXA equipment: Upgrading from a hologic QDR 1000/W to a QDR 2000

Summary In this study, the cross-calibration of a fan beam DXA system (Hologic QDR-2000) to a pencil beam scanner from the same manufacturer (Hologic QDR-1000/W) is described. The scanners were calibrated by the manufacturer using the same anthropomorphic spine phantom at installation. To verify consistent machine calibration, a group of 69 female subjects, aged 46–75, had anteroposterior (AP) spine and proximal femur scans on the QDR-1000/W followed by pencil and array scans of the same sites on the QDR-2000 during the same visit. Many of the subjects had bilateral examinations of the proximal femur for a total of 123 hip scans. Pencil and array area, bone mineral content (BMC), and bone mineral density (BMD) from the QDR-2000 were compared with the values obtained on the QDR-1000/W, and linear regression equations were derived for relating the two instruments. At the spine, no differences were found between the QDR-1000/W BMD values and the QDR-2000 array BMD values. A slight difference between pencil beam modes was detected but was not deemed clinically significant. Linear regression models relating the QDR-2000 and QDR-1000/W AP spine BMD measurements showed correlation coefficients greater than 0.99, with slopes of 1.00, intercepts equivalent to zero, and small root mean square errors. Comparisons at the proximal femur showed equivalency at the femoral neck and trochanter regions for the two machines in pencil mode, but slight increases in BMC and BMD at the other femoral sites on the QDR-2000 in both pencil and array mode. Correlation coefficients were 0.97–0.99 for all measurement regions except for Ward's. Regression slopes relating the BMD for the femoral regions were 1.00–1.04, with intercepts not significantly different from zero and small residual errors. As with the spine, the differences were small enough that they were not of clinical significance. However, in longitudinal drug trials requiring highly precise determination of spinal and femoral BMD changes, these differences may be important.     

Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry in Small Rats with Low Bone Mineral Density

The feasibility of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) using the Norland XR-26 Mark II bone densitometer for measurements of bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD) in small rats was evaluated. Thirty-two young, isogenic, Lewis rats (weights from 119 g to 227 g) were used; normal rats (n = 7) and rats with low BMD obtained from three different vitamin D-depleted models (n = 25). DXA measurements were performed using the special software for small animals. Duplicate scans of excised femurs performed at 2 mm/second (pixel size of 0.5 mm × 0.5 mm) were very precise measurements with a coefficient of variation (CV) below 1.6% in animals with normal BMD; in rats with low BMD, the CV was significantly higher (P= 0.02–0.04), 7.8% and 4.4% for BMC and BMD, respectively. Regression analysis demonstrated that these measurements were related to the ash weight (R² > 98.6%). The CV for measurements of the lumbar spine at 10 mm/second (pixel size 0.5 mm × 0.5 mm) was 2.6% and 2.2% for BMC and BMD, respectively in rats with normal BMD, and again higher (P= 0.03–0.14) in rats with low BMD, 7.3% and 4.7%, respectively, for BMC and BMD. Even though low CVs were obtained for total body duplicate scans (scan speed of 20 mm/second and a pixel size of 1.5 mm × 1.5 mm), the measurements were problematic for accuracy because of an overestimation of both BMC and the area of bone. Using these scan parameters the measurements of total body bone mineral could not be recommended in small rats with low BMD. Received: 21 May 1999 / Accepted: 3 August 2000 / Online publication: 22 December 2000     

Precision and Accuracy of a Transportable Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Unit for Bone Mineral Measurements in Guinea Pigs

Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is a valuable tool for measuring bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD) in small-animal research. The present study was devised to establish guidelines and to define sites for bone mineral measurements in guinea pigs and to evaluate the accuracy of a new transportable research DXA unit. Repeated scans were performed on 30 guinea pig hindlimbs (in situ) as well as the isolated bones from these limbs (ex situ). Nine exactly specified regions of interest (ROIs) were analyzed twice for BMC and BMD by three different observers. Additionally, the BMC of whole bones and bone segments as measured by DXA was correlated to ash weights of bone in a subset of five animals to determine the accuracy of the DXA measurements. On ex situ scans, intra-observer variability for BMD ranged from 0.09% to 2.33% and inter-observer variability from 0.23% to 5.86% depending on the site studied, with smaller ROIs exhibiting more variability. Coefficients of variance (CV) for BMC measurements were slightly higher than for BMD. However, BMC offered a better correlation between in situ and ex situ values than BMD. On in situ scans, observer variability for BMD and BMC for comparable sites was higher than the ex situ variability. The results of this study indicate that DXA provides an accurate measurement of BMC even in small specimens. The precision of BMC and BMD measurements in situ can be improved considerably by using specific, well-defined ROIs and by careful placement of the bones to be scanned in close proximity to the scanning surface.     

Comparison of two Hologic DXA systems (QDR 1000 and QDR 4500/A) for in vivo bone mass measurement in the baboon (Papio ursinus).

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the gold standard for bone mass measurement in humans. New generation osteodensitometers have been introduced and numerous studies have been performed to compare new and old devices for in vivo measurements of bone mineral density (BMD). However similar studies in nonhuman primates have yet to be performed. In this longitudinal study, two generation of osteodensitometers from the same manufacturer (Hologic QDR 1000 and Hologic QDR 4500/A) were used to detect bone changes in a cohort of 24 ovariectomized (OVX) Chacma baboons (Papio ursinus) during a period of 36 mo. Correlation between the same osteodensitometers were also obtained for the lumbar spine (L1-L4) area, BMD, and bone mineral content (BMC) in a cohort of 33 adult female baboons and for the total hip area, BMD, and BMC in a group of 25 adult female baboons. The QDR 1000 to QDR 4500/A area, BMC, and BMD correlation coefficient (r(2)) were 0.848, 0.939, and 0.916, respectively; r(2) for total hip BMD was 0.818. Percentage of variation (PV) among the total vertebral (L1-L4) area measured by the two osteodensitometers was 5.3 +/- 2.3 (mean +/- SD). BMC had the lowest PV and the highest r(2). The mean lumbar BMD was higher when measured by QDR 1000 with a PV% of 7.7 +/- 3.1 (mean +/- SD). The mean hip BMD was higher measured by QDR 1000 with a PV% of 9.3 +/- 7.1 (mean +/- SD). Slopes of two regression lines for the lumbar spine (L1-L4) and total hip BMD were 0.928 and 0.914, respectively. Longitudinal analysis of lumbar BMD in OVX baboons showed that QDR 4500/A detected a significant bone density increase at 36 and 48 mo post- OVX, compared to time 12, whereas the QDR 1000 did not. Our results indicate that both osteodensitometers can be used to measure bone changes in longitudinal studies in primates, but that before upgrading to a newgeneration osteodensitometer, a calibration curve has to be obtained so that both devices can be equally used in regular experimental study in nonhuman primates.     

Total dose incurred by patients and staff from BMD measurement using a new 2D digital bone densitometer

Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is a widely used and precise technique for non-invasive assessment of bone mineral density. The DXA systems have evolved from pencil X-ray beam (single detector) to fan beam (linear array detector) and recently cone beam densitometers (bi-dimensional detector), allowing for an examination to occur without any scanning and with a short acquisition time. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient and staff dose from a new cone beam densitometer, the DMS Lexxos. Measurements were performed on a DMS Lexxos bone densitometer prototype. An anthropomorphic phantom and thermoluminescent dosimeters were used to evaluate the effective dose. Ionization chambers and electronic personal dosimeters were used to evaluate the staff dose. The effective dose is 8.4 micro Sv for an anteroposterior spine examination and 4.8 micro Sv for a femoral neck in standard mode. The averaged scattered dose rate (ambient dose equivalent) at 1 m from the beam is evaluated at 226 micro Sv/h. Assuming six patients per hour with two views per patient, the time averaged dose rate is evaluated at 2.9 micro Sv/h. By the personal dosimeter, the staff dose (Hp 10) at 1 m from the beam is evaluated at 0.23 micro Sv per examination. For one examination, patient and staff dose from this new technology remains low: in the same range as the fan-beam densitometer.     

Bone mass in young women is dependent on lean body mass.

Relationships between bone mineral density (BMD) and body mass, height, fat mass, and lean mass have been reported. This study examined the relationship between body size and composition on bone density in young premenopausal women. In this study, a cross-sectional design was used. Seventy-one healthy women aged between 24 and 36 yr selected to have a wide range of boy habitus (mean body mass index, 22.7+/-3.0) underwent a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) whole-body bone density scan (Hologic QDR 2000). Their bone density and soft tissue body composition and anthropometric parameters (skinfolds, girths, limb lengths, bone breadths, height, and body mass) were analyzed, and their body composition was assessed by underwater weighing (UWW). Bone-free lean mass (BFLM) determined by DXA was correlated with both bone mineral content (BMC) and BMD (r=0.74, p<0.001; r=0.48, p<0.001, respectively). In addition, fat-free mass (FFM) determined by UWW was correlated with BMC and BMD (r=0.80, p<0.001; r=0.48, p<0.001, respectively). Controlling for height in the model removed most of the correlations with whole-body BMD, with the exception of FFM, BFLM, and shoulder breadth (r=0.39, p<0.001; r=0.37, p<0.01; and r=0.34, p<0.01, respectively). No correlation was found between fat mass by DXA, UWW, and sum of skinfolds and BMD. These results indicate that bone mass in premenopausal women is dependent on lean body mass.