Prognostic Evaluation of the New American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer Staging System for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Analysis of 112 Cirrhotic Patients Resected for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background In 2002, the American Joint Committee on Cancer and the International Union Against Cancer redefined the T-classification for hepatocellular carcinoma, shifting the cutoff value for tumor size from 2 to 5 cm and giving more emphasis to vascular invasion.Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 223 consecutive patients with hepatocellular carcinoma observed between 1990 and 2002. One hundred twelve were resected and considered for retrospective analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on several clinicopathologic variables. After classification according to each staging system, the long-term survival of different stages was compared. The prognostic value of each staging system was further evaluated by entering each stage, in turn, into the Cox regression model with other clinicopathologic variables. The median follow-up was 19 months.Results On multivariate analysis, the viral etiology of cirrhosis and the presence of multiple nodules were independent prognostic factors. When the new staging system was entered into the multivariate analysis, it was the only independent factor (P = .02). When stratified according to the old tumor-node-metastasis system, there were no significant differences in the survival between stage I and II (P = .14) or between stage IIIA and IVA (P = .33); only the survival of stage II and IIIA was different (P < .01). When stratified according to the new tumor-node-metastasis system, there were significant differences between stage I and II (71.7% vs. 54.7%; P = .02).Conclusions The new staging system is a more reliable and objective method for T classification. It is easy to use in clinical practice and is better at stratifying curatively resected patients with respect to prognosis.Published by Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. © 2005 The Society of Surgical Oncology, Inc.     

Evaluation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Proposal of a New Staging System

Purpose. To identify and propose corrections for deficiencies in the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) system for staging cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC).
Materials and Methods. Prognostic factors for CSCC were identified by retrospective analysis of the published literature. Limitations and deficiencies in the current AJCC staging system for CSCC were then determined using these prognostic factors.
Results. Size, histologic differentiation, location, previous treatment, depth of invasion, tumor thickness, histologic subtype, perineural spread, and scar etiology are the most powerful tumor prognostic indicators in patients with localized disease. The most important prognostic factors for patients with nodal metastases are the location, number, and size of the positive lymph nodes. Proposed changes for the T classification include increased stratification of tumor size, identification of patients with perineural invasion, and the addition of tumor thickness or depth of invasion. The N classification has been expanded to include the number and size of nodal metastases.
Conclusion. The current AJCC staging system for carcinoma of the skin has deficiencies that limit its use for CSCC. The proposed TMN staging system for CSCC more accurately reflects the prognosis and natural history of CSCC.
SCOTT M. DINEHART, MD, AND STEVEN PETERSON, MD, HAVE INDICATED NO SIGNIFICANT INTEREST WITH COMMERCIAL SUPPORTERS.     

Minimum number of lymph nodes that should be examined for the International Union Against Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM classification of gastric carcinoma

Abstract The classification of lymph node metastasis based on the number of positive nodes has been adopted in the International Union Against Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer (UICC/AJCC) TNM classification of gastric carcinoma. However, the N classification (for condition of the regional lymph nodes) would be underestimated when the number of examined nodes were too small. To determine the minimum number of lymph nodes to examine for a correct classification, we analyzed 926 patients undergoing curative resection for gastric carcinoma. The number of metastatic lymph nodes correlated significantly with the number of examined lymph nodes. The pN0 patients with 10 to 14 examined nodes showed a significantly higher survival rate than did those with 5 to 9 examined nodes, and they had as good a prognosis as those with 15 or more examined nodes. In the pN1 and pN2 categories, patients with 29 or fewer examined nodes tended toward lower survival rates than did patients with 30 or more examined nodes. Among the patients who were classified as stage IA, the survival rate for those with 5 to 9 examined nodes was significantly lower than that for patients with 30 or more examined nodes. Among the patients classified as stage III, those with 10 to 19 examined nodes and those with 20 to 29 examined nodes had lower survival rates than did patients with 30 or more examined nodes. In conclusion, the minimum number of lymph nodes examined for a correct pN0 classification can be reduced from 15 to 10. For pN1–3 classifications, 20 or more nodes should be examined, and examining 30 or more lymph nodes may be desirable. Electronic Publication     

第8版国际抗癌联盟和美国癌症联合委员会胃癌TNM分期系统简介及解读

目前胃癌的TNM分期已经成为临床胃癌诊疗的首选参考依据。在国际抗癌联盟(UICC)、国际胃癌协会(IGCA)和美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)的共同协作推动下,通过对全世界范围内胃癌大数据的收集与分析,于2016年10月颁布了第8版胃癌TNM分期系统。第8版TNM分期系统对食管-胃结合部及贲门癌分期标准的选择做出了明确的定义;同时还在单一分期系统的基础上新增了临床TNM分期(cTNM)和新辅助治疗后分期(ypTNM)。此外,新版的分期系统将N3的两个亚组N3a和N3b作为独立组别纳入到分期系统,还对组织学分级进行了一些调整。总的来说,相比第7版胃癌TNM分期系统,新版的分期系统可以指导临床医生更加合理地制定治疗方案,更加科学地评价治疗效果,更加准确地评估预后。然而,随着临床广泛应用和进一步验证,以及新的预测因子的发现,必将会有新的分期系统替代和完善旧的分期系统。     

Evaluation of the Seventh Edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM Staging System for Gastric Cancer: Results from a Chinese Monoinstitutional Study

Background

To investigate the validity of the 7th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system for gastric cancer with special attention paid to pT2/pT3, pN1/pN2, and pN3a/pN3b category.

Materials and Methods

Clinicopathologic data of 1998 patients underwent R0 surgery for histologically proven gastric cancers with >15 lymph nodes retrieved were retrospectively reviewed.

Results

Prognoses were significantly different between pT2 and pT3 categories, between pN1 and pN2 categories, or between pN3a and pN3b categories. Each stage in the 6th edition was divided into the 7th edition stage with different survival rates. Moreover, stage IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC in the 7th edition system was divided into the 6th edition stage with different survival rates. Prognoses for patients in 7th edition T4aN1M0/T3N2M0/T2N3aM0, T4bN0-1M0/T4aN2M0/T3N3aM0, and T4aN3aM0/T4bN2M0 were similar to that of patients in T1N3bM0, T2N3bM0, and T3N3bM0, respectively, but significantly better than that of patients in T2N3bM0, T3N3bM0, and T4aN3bM0, respectively. However, no significant difference could be observed among patients in T4bN3aM0, T4aN3bM0, T4bN3bM0, and stage IV. A revised TNM system was proposed, in which T1N3bM0 was incorporated into stage IIIA, T2N3bM0 into stage IIIB, T3N3bM0 into stage IIIC, T4bN3aM0/T4aN3bM0/T4bN3bM0 into stage IV. Further analyses revealed the revised TNM system had better homogeneity, discriminatory ability, and monotonicity of gradients than the 6th and the 7th edition system.

Conclusions

It is reasonable to subclassify the 6th edition pT2 category and pN1 category into the 7th edition pT2/pT3 category and pN1/pN2 category, respectively. However, for better prognostic stratification, it might be more suitable for pN3a and pN3b categories to be considered individual determinants of the 7th edition TNM staging system.     

Proposed Modification of the Seventh American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Chinese Patients

Background

More data are essential to test the efficacy of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) system for staging esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). On the basis of previous studies, we propose a modification to this system to better represent the survival characteristics of ESCC in the Chinese population.

Methods

We used data from two centers to establish the generating (n = 1006) and validation (n = 783) cohorts. All of the patients underwent curative surgical treatment. On the basis of previous studies, we excluded tumor location as a variable in the modified pathological staging system and defined the modified nodal categories as follows: N0, node negative; N1, 1 positive node; N2, 2 to 3 positive nodes; and N3, >3 positive nodes. The pathological T categories, pathological M categories, and cell differentiation in the seventh AJCC staging system for adenocarcinoma were used in the modified pathological staging system for ESCC.

Results

The median survival times for ESCC patients with stage 0 and Ia, stage Ib, stage IIa, stage IIb, stage IIIa, stage IIIb, stage IIIc were as follows: not reached, 221.2, 151.8, 88.5, 25.0, 19.0, and 13.0 months, respectively, for the entire cohort of patients (n = 1789). The corresponding 5-year survival rates were 86.7, 76.4, 64.9, 55.3, 29.9, 16.9, and 9.7 %, respectively. The survival rates significantly differed between the modified staging groups (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

This modified staging system better discriminates the survival differences between stages than the seventh edition of the AJCC staging system for ESCC in Chinese patients.     

Toward Better Soft Tissue Sarcoma Staging: Building on American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Systems Versions 6 and 7

Background

Based on review of patient data in case conferences over time, we hypothesized that clinically relevant data are omitted in routine soft tissue sarcoma staging.

Methods

We examined subsets of a prospectively collected single institution soft tissue sarcoma database with respect to criteria of the AJCC versions 6 (2002) and 7 (2010) staging systems and examined their clinical outcomes.

Results

Relapse-free survival decreases with increasing primary tumor size in four categories, versus two categories used in AJCC 6 and 7 staging. Disease-specific survival decreases over three categories. Conversely, omission of tumor depth as a prognostic factor in version 7 appears supported, since tumor depth is not an independent risk factor for disease-specific survival by multivariate analysis. Patients with nodal disease and no other metastases fare better than patients with other metastases, but have inferior outcomes compared with patients with large high-grade tumors without nodal metastasis. Multivariate analysis identified size, site, grade, age, nodal metastatic disease, and other metastatic disease as independent risk factors for disease-specific survival. Versions 6 and 7 criteria are tacit regarding anatomic site and histology for tumors with identical FNCLCC grade.

Conclusions

Improved patient risk assessment may be achieved by staging using a larger number of size categories. Staging system refinements come at the cost of a larger number of staging categories. Histology or site-specific staging systems, nomograms or Bayesian belief networks may provide more accurate means to assess clinical outcomes.     

The ability of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging system to predict progression-free survival after radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVE: To examine, in a retrospective analysis of outcome based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, whether the 1992 and revised 1997 staging criteria for prostate cancer can be used to predict progression-free survival for patients after radical prostatectomy for pT2 and pT3 prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 291 patients with a PSA determination during a 6-month interval after radical prostatectomy were analysed (mean follow-up 5.2 years). In the absence of a uniform system of pathological staging, the histopathological stage was defined according to the 1992 and 1997 American Joint Cancer Committee/Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (AJCC/UICC) tumour-nodes-metastases (TNM) staging classification. Findings were correlated with the PSA value after surgery. The subgroups of pT2 and pT3 disease were compared for the time to PSA progression, using Kaplan-Meier data analysis and the log-rank test. RESULTS: The biochemical progression-free 5-year survival rates for stage pT2 were 83% (pT2a), 81% (pT2b) and 62% (pT2c); there were no significant differences in the pT2 subgroups. The recurrence-free rates for pT3 were 79% (pT3a), 65% (pT3b) and 50% (pT3c); the actuarial recurrence-free rate was significantly different for patients with 1997 AJCC pT3a vs pT3b disease (P=0.0132). There was no significant difference in the 1992 AJCC stages pT2a vs pT2b (P=0.1232) and the recurrence-free rate was not significantly different for patients with 1992 AJCC pT3a vs pT3b disease (P=0.9). There was a significant difference in the likelihood of a PSA relapse between patients with positive and negative surgical margins (P=0.131). CONCLUSION: These results support the current revised 1997 AJCC/UICC staging system for prostate cancer. There is an urgent need to develop a pathological equivalent to the AJCC/UIC TNM clinical staging system. Greater clinical input and evaluation from different institutions are essential to reach consensus on pathological staging categories that maximize the predictability of outcome after definitive therapy. Crucial issues are the definition and quantification of extraprostatic extension and definition of surgical margin categories.     

Validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Vermilion Lip

Annals of Surgical Oncology - The vermilion lip is a unique anatomical junction between cutaneous and mucosal surfaces. Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the vermilion lip (vlSCC) was previously...     

Prediction of survival in gastric carcinoma related to lymph node grading by the new American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union International Contre le Cancer System or the Japanese system.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the classification of gastric cancer adopted by the American Joint Committee on Cancer and the Union International contre le Cancer (AJCC/UICC) (number of nodes involved) with the Japanese classification (sites of nodes involved). DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Teaching hospital, Turkey. SUBJECTS: 134 consecutive patients whose gastric cancer was treated by D2 resection. INTERVENTIONS: Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox's regression model. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Accuracy of prognosis. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in survival rates when pN1 and pN2 categories of the AJCC/UICC classification were subdivided into the n1 and n2 categories of the Japanese classification. However, when those in the n1 and n2 categories of the Japanese classification were subdivided into the pN1, pN2 and pN3 categories of the AJCC/UICC classification, survival differed significantly (p = 0.00001). When both classifications were combined in a multivariate analysis the pN category of the AJCC/UICC classification was found to be the most significant independent prognostic factor (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Classification of lymph node status by number of nodes (AJCC/UICC) rather than anatomical site (Japanese) gives a more accurate prognosis.     

Critical Evaluation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM Nodal Staging System in Patients with Lymph Node-Positive Disease after Radical Cystectomy

Background

The current 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging system for bladder cancer stages lymph node (LN)–positive disease based on LN location rather than LN size. In addition, common iliac LNs are now considered regional LNs. Whether these changes improve prognostication for node-positive patients, however, remains unclear.

Objective

To investigate whether the 7th edition of the TNM nodal staging system provides superior prognostication compared with the 6th edition.

Design, setting, and participants

Patients between 2002 and 2008 with LN metastases after radical cystectomy combined with extended or superextended LN dissection were included. Patients were staged using both TNM staging systems. Median follow-up was 54 mo.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to test associations of pathologic variables with OS and RFS.

Results and limitations

Included were 146 patients with LN metastases of whom 131 patients underwent superextended LN dissection and 15 patients underwent extended LN dissection. Although in the 7th TNM edition many patients moved from the N2 category to the N3 category, RFS did not significantly differ within the nodal subgroups in either editions. LN metastases at or above the aortic bifurcation were not associated with decreased RFS (p = 0.67). On multivariable analysis, the presence of extravesical disease (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.84; p = 0.002), absence of adjuvant chemotherapy (HR: 0.32; p < 0.0001), and more than six positive LNs (HR: 2.72; p = 0.007) were associated with decreased RFS. This was a retrospective study with inherent limitations.

Conclusions

LNs at or above the aortic bifurcation should be considered regional LNs. Neither the 6th nor the 7th TNM staging system performed well as a prognostic tool. A better staging system for LN-positive bladder cancer needs to be developed.