Student perceptions of sudden cardiac arrest: a qualitative inquiry

Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) is the number one cause of death in young athletes in high school and university settings. Survival and outcomes of SCA is dependent on appropriate recognition of symptoms and immediate cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), along with a shock from an automatic external defibrillator (AED). The three aims of the authors' study presented in this article were: to describe university students' perceptions and beliefs about sudden cardiac arrest, to describe university students' understanding of an AED and their level of preparedness to recognize and respond to a life threatening emergency event, and to identify university students' experiences of responding to handling life-threatening emergency events. Qualitative methodology was employed using semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis. Three major themes emerged from data analysis: confusion, uncertainty, and fear/uncomfortableness. These themes characterised participant's perceptions about SCA. The authors concluded that a lack of understanding of what SCA is and participants' inability to respond to an emergency event was evident.     

Locational effect on automated external defibrillator use and association of age with on-site return of spontaneous circulation

BackgroundEmergency medical services (EMSs) are used by approximately 383,000 patients with out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) in the United States. Hence, it is crucial to implement automated external defibrillator (AED) programs to prepare responders for an SCA emergency. Taiwanese pass legislature to enforce AED installation in 8 mandatory areas since 2013. Our study investigated the efficacy of the policy regarding AED installation.Materials and methodsWe collected data of patients who had sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) in pre-hospital settings, and received resuscitative efforts, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation or defibrillation with AEDs. The data were from July 11, 2013 to July 31, 2015. In total, 209 adult patients were documented by on-site caregivers of different facilities, and a report was mailed to the central health and welfare unit.ResultsSchools, large-scale gathering places, and special institutions used AEDs the most, accounting for 33 (15.3%) cases. From non-mandatory AED areas, long-term care facilities had the maximum cases of AED use (32 cases; 14.9%). With commuting stations as a reference, long-distance transport had the lowest odds ratio (OR) of 0.481 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24–0.962). The OR for schools, large-scale gathering places, and special institutions was 4.474 (95% CI: 2.497–8.015). Regarding failure of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), the OR for the ≥80-year age group was higher than that for the 20–39-year age group.ConclusionsThe policy regarding the legislation to install AEDs in mandatory areas improved AED accessibility. Elderly patients aged ≥80 years have a higher rate of ROSC failure.     

Feasibility of public access to defibrillation

Immediate defibrillation is the single most effective therapy to reverse ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest today. The once physician-only skill of defibrillation has entered mainstream society and is saving the lives of many sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) victims in a variety of settings. The automated external defibrillator (AED) and the concept of public access defibrillation (PAD) are a result of collaborative efforts between the American Heart Association (AHA) and medical manufacturers. Today, airports, airlines, casinos, cruise ships, and other public venues have modernized their first aid kits to include an AED. The success of these programs has ignited a trend in public safety and subsequently marketed the worth of AEDs in the home. Although optimal placement of AEDs remains uncertain, PAD is showing great promise in reducing the death rate from SCA. The lay public, both trained and untrained, is emerging as the next level of emergency care responders able to use a defibrillator.     

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation alone vs. cardiopulmonary resuscitation plus automated external defibrillator use by non-healthcare professionals: a meta-analysis on 1583 cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

BACKGROUND: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) accounts for 250.000-350.000 sudden cardiac deaths per year in the United States. The availability of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) promoted the implementation of public access defibrillation programs based on out-of-hospital early defibrillation by non-healthcare professionals. AIM OF THE STUDY: To perform a systematic review and a meta-analysis of the pooled effect of studies comparing the outcome of pts receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation plus AED therapy (CPR+AED) vs. cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) alone, both delivered by non-healthcare professionals, for the treatment of OHCA. METHODS: We performed a search of the relevant literature exploring major scientific databases, carrying out a hand search of key journals, analysing conference proceedings and abstracts and discussing the topic with other researchers. Two analyses were planned to assess the outcomes of interest (survival to hospital admission and survival to hospital discharge). RESULTS: Three studies were selected for the meta-analysis. The first meta-analysis evidenced a RR of 1.22 (95% C.I.: 1.04-1.43) of surviving to hospital admission for people treated with CPR+AED as compared to CPR-only. The second meta-analysis showed a RR of 1.39 (95% C.I.: 1.06-1.83) of surviving to hospital discharge for people treated with CPR+AED as compared to CPR-only. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our meta-analysis demonstrate that programs based on CPR plus early defibrillation with AEDs by trained non-healthcare professionals offer a survival advantage over CPR-only in OHCA. The conclusions of our meta-analysis add to previous evidence in favour of developing public-health strategies based on AED use by trained layrescuers.     

Improved Survival from Cardiac Arrest in the Community

We now know that the elements required to achieve the highest survival rates from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest include: witnessed arrest, rapid telephone notification of the emergency medical service, early initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, rapid arrival within minutes of emergency personnel equipped with a defibrillator, and early advanced airway management and intravenous pharmacology. In the United States, and in several other countries innovative approaches have been tried to bring all these elements together in one system. These approaches include community-wide CPR training programs, telephone-assisted CPR instruction delivered at the time of a cardiac arrest, early defibrillation performed by family members of high risk patients, early defibrillation performed by minimally trained community responders, and early defibrillation performed by minimally trained ambulance personnel. Controlled, prospective studies have demonstrated the effectiveness and practicality of all of these approaches. New studies are in progress with the prehospital use of early transcutaneous cardiac pacing and these show promise. This article reviews the evidence that supports these multi-layered and innovative approaches to the treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.     

T IME TO F IRST S HOCK BY E MERGENCY M EDICAL T ECHNICIANS WITH A UTOMATED E XTERNAL D EFIBRILLATORS

The interval from collapse to electrical rescue shock is a critical determinant of successful defibrillation in cardiac arrest. In order to achieve the earliest possible defibrillation, many emergency medical services (EMS) systems equip first-responding units with an automated external defibrillator (AED). Objective. To measure the time from on-scene emergency medical technician (EMT) recognition of cardiac arrest to AED application and shock in ventricular fibrillation (VF) arrest. In addition, the authors sought to understand the reasons for delays. Methods. Using the AED recordings and written EMS reports, the authors conducted a retrospective cohort study of all persons who experienced an EMS-attended VF cardiac arrest in which an AED was applied and a shock delivered by an EMT, from January 1999 through December 2000 (n = 177). Based on the bimodal distribution of times, two groups were assembled: no delay (time to shock ≤ 90 seconds) and delayed (time to shock > 90 seconds). Patient and event characteristics associated with delay status were determined using Mantel-Haenszel methods. Results. The median (25th, 75th percentile) time from cardiac arrest recognition to shock was 51 (43, 64) seconds. Ninety-four percent (n = 166) of the cohort received a shock within 90 seconds. Delayed shock was associated with unwitnessed arrest status (odds ratio = 9.3, 95% confidence interval = 2.3, 36.8) and nursing home location (odds ratio = 10.0, 95% confidence interval = 2.1, 47.5). Conclusion. The findings suggest that a 1-minute goal and a 90-second minimum standard for time to first shock are appropriate for EMT AED defibrillation in the field.     

Recommendations of the international guidelines 2000 conference on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiac care: an overview

The greatest potential for survival of sudden cardiac arrest can be achieved only by providing early intervention using evidence-based therapies that have been studied over time. Emergency cardiac care and the 2000 advanced cardiac life support guidelines encompass all therapies that have been shown to improve outcomes in patients who experience life-threatening events that involve the cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and pulmonary systems. Early recognition of warning signs, activation of emergency medical systems within the community, basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation, early defibrillation, airway management, and intravenous medication administration are key factors in improving resuscitation outcomes.     

Prompt Advanced Life Support Improves Survival from Ventricular Fibrillation

Objective. To determine whether the interval between the arrival of basic life support (BLS) providers and the arrival of advanced life support (ALS) providers is associated with patient outcome after cardiac arrest. Methods. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all witnessed, out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation (VF) cardiac arrests between January 1, 1991, and December 31, 2007. Eligible patients (n = 1,781) received full resuscitation efforts from both BLS and ALS providers. Results. The BLS-to-ALS arrival interval was a significant predictor of survival to hospital discharge (odds ratio [OR] 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93–0.99); the likelihood of survival decreased by 4% for every minute that ALS arrival was delayed following BLS arrival. Other significant predictors of survival were whether the arrest occurred in public (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.19–1.85), whether a bystander administered cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.07–1.68), and the interval between the 9-1-1 call and BLS arrival (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.73–0.83). Conclusions. We found that a shorter BLS-to-ALS arrival interval increased the likelihood of survival to hospital discharge after a witnessed, out-of-hospital VF cardiac arrest. We conclude that ALS interventions may provide additional benefits over BLS interventions alone when utilized in a well-established, two-tiered emergency medical services (EMS) system already optimized for rapid defibrillation. The highest priorities in any EMS system should still be early CPR and early defibrillation, but timely ALS services can supplement these crucial interventions.     

Legal aspects of the application of the lay rescuer automatic external defibrillator (AED) program in South Korea

The American Heart Association has stated that the automatic external defibrillator (AED) is a promising method for achieving rapid defibrillation, and emphasized that AED training and use should be available in every community. The demonstrated safety and effectiveness of the AED make it ideally suited for the delivery of early defibrillation by trained laypersons, and the placement of AEDs in selected locations for immediate use by trained laypersons may enable critical intervention that can significantly increase survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The American Heart Association recommends the installation of AEDs in public locations such as airports, thus allowing laypersons to conduct defibrillation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation on the occasion of adverse cardiopulmonary events. In Korea, the Ministry of Health and Welfare officially prohibits the installation of AEDs in public locations on the grounds that cardiopulmonary resuscitation and defibrillation are understood as medical practices that can be conducted only by licensed medical practitioners. The purpose of this article is to discuss the necessity for AEDs and the appropriate process for their implementation in Korea, by examining the current pre-AED status of Korea and the relevant legal aspects.     

Double Sequential Defibrillation for Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation: A Case Report

Abstract

A 40-year-old male struck his chest against a pole during a basketball game and had sudden out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. After bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, fire and emergency medical services personnel provided six defibrillation attempts prior to emergency department arrival. A 7th attempt in the emergency department using a different vector was unsuccessful. On the 8th attempt, using a second defibrillator with defibrillator pads placed adjacent to the primary set of defibrillator pads, two shocks were administered in near simultaneous fashion. The double sequential defibrillation was successful and the patient had return of spontaneous circulation at the next pulse check. He recovered in the intensive care unit, was discharged home 1 month later, and continues to follow up in clinic over 1 year later with a Cerebral Performance Category score of 1 (short-term memory deficits).     

Outcomes after ventricular fibrillation out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: expanding the chain of survival

Coronary heart disease is the most common cause of death in the United States, with ventricular fibrillation (VF) the most common initial rhythm when cardiac disease causes arrest. Survival after VF out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) depends on a sequence of events called the chain of survival, which Includes rapid access to emergency medical services, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, defibrillation, and advanced care. Because of widespread implementation of defibrillation programs, more patients survive VF OHCAs, making subsequent care of these patients important. Early hospitalization must focus on potential neurologic injury and therapy targeted at the underlying cardiac disease and antiarrhythmic therapy for long-term secondary prevention of sudden death. Attention to certain cohorts who are at high risk despite their underlying disease, such as women and elderly patients, is necessary. These cohorts may have the greatest response to short-term and long-term therapies for cardiac rehabilitation. With these approaches, long-term survival and quality of life after VF OHCA are favorable. Broadening the focus of the chain of survival to include in-hospital and long-term care will further improve favorable outcomes achieved in an early defibrillation program.     

心肺脑复苏成功的相关因素分析

目的:探讨脑复苏与心肺复苏开始时间、早期除颤、病发场所、年龄、通气方式等相关因素临床意义.方法:回顾性分析我科2005年12月-2010年12月因心跳骤停行心肺复苏(CPR)283例的临床资料.结果:283例中心肺脑复苏成功41例,心肺脑复苏成功率与心跳骤停发生场所(院内、院外),CPR开始时间、早期电除颤、气道通气方式、年龄等因素相关.结论:开始心肺复苏时间越早,自主循环恢复时间愈快,GCS评分愈高.     

In-hospital cardiac arrest

To review the current management of in-hospital cardiac arrest and to identify variables that influence outcomes, OLDMEDLINE from 1950 to 1966 and MEDLINE from 1966 to March 2005 were searched using the keywords cardiopulmonary resuscitation, cardiac arrest, in hospital, and adult. Secondary sources were derived from review publications and personal communications by one of the authors. There is no secure evidence that the ultimate outcomes after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in settings of in-hospital cardiac arrest have improved in the >40 yrs that followed the landmark report by Kouwenhoven, Jude, and Knickerbocker, which launched the modern era of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. A paucity of objective measurements preclude secure protocols for sequencing of interventions and, even more, when to initiate and discontinue cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The preparedness of both physicians and nursing professionals to implement the published guidelines has itself been questioned. Whereas early access defibrillation with automated external defibrillators may be of benefit in out-of-hospital settings, there has as yet been no secure evidence that automated external defibrillators have had a favorable impact on in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation when used on infrequent occasions by first responders. This contrasts with the much greater success of advanced life support providers and especially when electrical defibrillation is promptly performed by expertly trained personnel after onset of cardiac arrest. Outcomes are therefore improved in critical care settings and especially in coronary care units in which patients are continuously monitored.     

How to launch a community early defibrillation program

More than 60 emergency services professionals attended an EMS Today 2001 preconference symposium, "How to Champion Public Access Defibrillation in Your Community: Leadership, Art and Science," hosted by AED manufacturer Philips/Heartstream. Their goal: to learn the practicalities of starting and maintaining an early defibrillation program in their communities. The recent increase in research and attention to community early defibrillation programs led Philips/Heartstream to host the symposium, which featured cardiac arrest survivor Diane Jackson, as well as three community early defibrillation program advocates who've implemented early defibrillation programs in their communities. Their advice for kick-starting early defibrillation programs in your community follows.     

In-hospital cardiac arrest

In-hospital sudden cardiac arrest and resuscitation is distinct from out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest (OOHSCA) and warrants specific attention. Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) is a manifestation of an underlying process rather than a disease itself. The complex, multiorgan system dysfunction common among the inpatient population can precipitate SCA by both similar and very different mechanisms than OOHSCA. The diagnostic and treatment algorithms of SCA remain largely the same between the inpatient and outpatient arenas. The application of complex diagnostic and therapeutic interventions is permissible, but such tools must not interrupt or delay the important basics of cardiac arrest management in the inpatient setting, including adequate chest compressions and timely defibrillation when appropriate.     

Resuscitating Resuscitation: Advanced Therapies for Resistant Ventricular Dysrhythmias

BackgroundMore than 640,000 combined in-hospital and out-of-hospital cardiac arrests occur annually in the United States. However, survival rates and meaningful neurologic recovery remain poor. Although “shockable” rhythms (i.e., ventricular fibrillation (VF) and pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VT)) have the best outcomes, many of these ventricular dysrhythmias fail to return to a perfusing rhythm (resistant VF/VT), or recur shortly after they are resolved (recurrent VF/VT).ObjectiveThis review discusses 4 emerging therapies in the emergency department for treating these resistant or recurrent ventricular dysrhythmias: beta-blocker therapy, dual simultaneous external defibrillation, stellate ganglion blockade, and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. We discuss the underlying physiology of each therapy, review relevant literature, describe when these approaches should be considered, and provide evidence-based recommendations for these techniques.DiscussionEsmolol may mitigate some of epinephrine's negative effects when used during resuscitation, improving both postresuscitation cardiac function and long-term survival. Dual simultaneous external defibrillation targets the region of the heart where ventricular fibrillation typically resumes and may apply a more efficient defibrillation across the heart, leading to higher rates of successful defibrillation. Stellate ganglion blocks, recently described in the emergency medicine literature, have been used to treat patients with recurrent VF/VT, resulting in significant dysrhythmia suppression. Finally, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation is used to provide cardiopulmonary support while clinicians correct reversible causes of arrest, potentially resulting in improved survival and good neurologic functional outcomes.ConclusionThese emerging therapies do not represent standard practice; however, they may be considered in the appropriate clinical scenario when standard therapies are exhausted without success.     

Police AED programs: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Approximately 359,400 out-of-hospital cardiac arrests occur in the United States every year, and around 60% of them are treated by emergency medical services (EMS) personnel. In order to alleviate the impact of this public health burden, some communities have trained police officers as first responders so that they can provide cardiopulmonary resuscitation and defibrillation to cardiac arrest patients. This paper is a review of the current literature on the impact of police automated external defibrillators (AEDs) programs in these communities.

Methods and results

A literature search of electronic journal databases was conducted to identify articles that evaluated police AED programs and quantified survival rates. The 10 articles that met the inclusion criteria were very heterogeneous in terms of study design, controlling for confounders, outcome definitions, and comparison groups. Two communities found a statistically significant difference in survival and 6 studies reported a statistically significant difference in time to defibrillation after the implementation of these programs. The weighted mean survival rate of the study groups was higher than that of the control groups (p < 0.001), as was the weighted mean survival rate of the group first shocked by police compared to those first shocked by EMS (39.4% vs. 28.6%, p < 0.001). The pooled relative risk of survival was 1.4 (95% CI: 1.3–1.6).

Conclusions

Though there are many challenges in initiating these programs, this literature review shows that time to defibrillation decreased and survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrests increased with the implementation of police AED programs.     

Short-term health system costs of paediatric in-hospital acute life-threatening events including cardiac arrest

ObjectivesAcute life-threatening events in children are medical emergencies requiring immediate intervention. They can be due to cardiac arrest, respiratory arrest or another cause of sudden compromise for example, choking. Internationally, hospital systems are being introduced to reduce preventable acute life-threatening events and, despite having significant resource implications, have not yet been subject to economic analysis. This study presents the additional short-term health service costs of in-hospital acute life-threatening events to inform a cost-effectiveness analysis of prevention strategies.MethodologyPatient level costs (GB pounds, price year 2005), in excess of baseline costs, were collected from a short-term NHS perspective. The cost per survivor to hospital discharge included the cost of the cardiopulmonary resuscitation attempt, resuscitation preparedness, and the cost of in-hospital post-resuscitation care. Acute life-threatening events calls were classified into two groups: cardiac arrest, and respiratory arrest and other acute life threatening events. Outcomes from these groups were compared to a similar group of unplanned Paediatric Intensive Care (PIC) admissions. All survival and length of stay outcomes were calculated for the first episode.ResultsThe survival to hospital discharge was 64.4% (65/101), (95% Confidence Intervals 55.02, 73.70) for all acute life-threatening event calls, and 41.3% (12/29), (95% Confidence Intervals 23.45, 59.31) for cardiac arrest. The mean cost of the resuscitation attempt was £3664 for all acute life-threatening event calls, and £3884 for cardiac arrest. The annual cost of cardiopulmonary resuscitation preparedness was £181,565.The mean cost of the post-event length of stay in hospital was £22,562 for cardiac arrest, £26,335 for other acute life-threatening events, and £26,138 for urgent PIC admissions. The cost per survivor to hospital discharge was £53,289.ConclusionThe short-term costs of paediatric in-hospital acute life-threatening events, including cardiac arrest, from an NHS perspective, are more expensive than those reported for adults, but similar to other life saving treatments. This new information will serve to improve efficiency in the current resuscitation programme and contribute to cost-effectiveness analysis of prevention strategies.     

A MIODARONE AND R URAL E MERGENCY M EDICAL S ERVICES C ARDIAC A RREST P ATIENTS : A C OST A NALYSIS

Objective: Recent American Heart Association guidelines suggest amiodarone as an antiarrhythmic in refractory ventricular fibrillation (VF) and pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VT). The authors sought to assess the impact of amiodarone use on outcomes and cost associated with this practice in a rural emergency medical services (EMS) state. Methods: Statewide EMS records were reviewed for the calendar year 1999. Data reviewed included prehospital diagnosis, medications given by prehospital providers to patients with cardiac arrest, and procedures performed, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and defibrillation. Cost-benefit analysis assumed the cost of amiodarone treatment to be $137.65 per patient encounter. Absolute risk reduction (ARR) and number needed to treat (NNT) analysis utilized resuscitation rates published in the ARREST and ALIVE trials. Results: During the study period, EMS providers diagnosed 2,189 patients as having cardiac arrest. Five hundred thirty-five (24.4%) cardiac arrest patients were defibrillated. One hundred sixty patients (7.3%), including 15 who did not receive defibrillation, were given lidocaine during resuscitation efforts. The annual cost increase from current practice for a statewide amiodarone VF/VT protocol was $21,822.40 (10,572.87%). The initial cost to stock EMS vehicles for this protocol would be $50,115.52. The cost-benefit analysis yielded a potential for one additional patient survival to hospital discharge in Maine per 3.125 years of system-wide practice at a cost of $68,840.00. Conclusion: Based on current data, instituting amiodarone treatment for refractory VF and pulseless VT in a rural EMS setting requires the investment of substantial resources, relative to current treatment strategies, for any potential survival benefit.