Sleep and comfort after Caesarean section

To compare postoperative well-being after general and epidural anaesthesia, 58 women undergoing Caesarean section were divided into a general anaesthetic group receiving intramuscular opioid postoperatively (26), and an epidural group receiving morphine via the epidural route (32). The epidural group required less analgesia (p less than 0.01 at 0.5 and 8 hours, p less than 0.001 at 4 hours). There was no difference in the use of oral analgesics. At 1, 4 and 24 hours after delivery more patients in the general anaesthesia group described themselves as very comfortable (p less than 0.05). More in the epidural group had a very good night's sleep during each night studied. Patients in the epidural group were slower to use the ward toilet (p less than 0.01) and had more itching (p less than 0.001). Our conclusion is that patients progressed well in both groups.     

Side-effects of epidural infusions of opioid bupivacaine mixtures

The incidence of side-effects occurring with epidural diamorphine (0.05 mg.ml-1), fentanyl (2.0 micrograms.ml-1), methadone (0.1 mg.ml-1), morphine (0.05 mg.ml-1) and pethidine (1.0 mg.ml-1) used by infusion in combination with bupivacaine has been compared. One hundred and sixty patients were studied, 32 receiving each opioid. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was significantly greater with morphine than fentanyl (p = 0.0097) and pethidine (p = 0.0021). The incidence of pruritis was significantly greater with morphine and diamorphine than with methadone (p = 0.012) and pethidine (p = 0.027). Morphine was also associated with a significantly greater incidence of urinary retention than pethidine (p = 0.012) and methadone (p = 0.025).     

A double-blind comparison of epidural ketamine and diamorphine for postoperative analgesia

Twenty patients who had abdominal hysterectomy under general anaesthesia were randomly assigned to receive either epidural ketamine (30 mg), or epidural diamorphine (5 mg) peri-operatively and on first request for analgesia. Failure to obtain satisfactory analgesia with one of the agents was treated by epidural administration of the other. Pain was assessed by an independent observer, and by the patient using a visual analogue scale. The mean (SD) pain score on recovery from general anaesthesia, on a scale of 0-4, was 2.9 (1.2) for the ketamine group and 1.0 (1.0) for the diamorphine group (p less than 0.01). The mean (SD) time to first request for analgesia was 272 (206) and 72 (41) minutes in the diamorphine and ketamine groups respectively (p less than 0.01). All patients in the diamorphine group obtained adequate analgesia, but all patients in the ketamine group were changed to epidural diamorphine. Epidural ketamine does not appear to be a sufficiently effective alternative to epidural diamorphine for routine use in postoperative pain.     

The effects of continuous intravenous naloxone on epidural morphine analgesia

Forty-five patients undergoing Caesarean section under epidural anesthesia with bupivacaine were randomly allocated to three groups. Group 1 received 4 mg of epidural morphine immediately postoperatively and 2 mg naloxone by intravenous infusion for 12 hours postoperatively; group 2 was treated as group 1 but without naloxone infusion; group 3 received 10 mg morphine intramuscularly and 20 ml epidural saline after delivery of the baby. Epidural morphine 4 mg produced better postoperative analgesia than 10 mg of morphine intramuscularly (p less than 0.001) and the intravenous infusion of naloxone did not ablate the analgesic effects of epidural morphine. The incidence of itching and vomiting was higher in the epidural opioid groups (p less than 0.05) and intravenous naloxone, although it reduced the severity of the itching, did not reduce its overall incidence. Respiratory depression was not detected in any of the three groups.     

Postoperative analgesia in major orthopaedic surgery. Epidural and intrathecal opiates

Sixty-two patients were given morphine 2 mg and 69 patients were given diamorphine 0.5 mg by either the epidural or intrathecal route. All had undergone either total hip replacement or spinal disc surgery. Forty-nine out of 131 patients required no further analgesia. Diamorphine was superior to morphine and the intrathecal route more effective than the epidural. Headache, pruritus, urinary retention and nausea and vomiting were recorded, the incidence of the latter being unacceptably high, particularly when the drugs were administered by the intrathecal route: one patient required resuscitation. It is suggested that previously reported respiratory depression using these techniques is associated with the administration of other analgesics contemporaneously; that dosage should be limited to one-fifth of the estimation intramuscular dose; and that patients should be observed in a recovery ward for 24 hours.     

Lumbar epidural morphine as an effective analgesic following cholecystectomy

Relief of pain with epidural morphine was evaluated in five patient subjects during two consecutive twenty-four hour periods after cholecystectomy. In one period, each subject received lumbar epidural morphine, first 4–6 mg, and twelve hours later, 2–3 mg; in the other period, epidural placebo at the same times. Except for four hours before each injection and twenty minutes thereafter, intramuscular morphine was administered as required throughout. The experiments were double-blind. Epidural morphine, unlike epidural placebo, reduced both a visual pain analogue score (p< 0.05) and a pain questionnaire score (p< 0.01) twenty minutes after injection. Epidural morphine compared to placebo reduced by one-half the total amount of narcotic (epidural plus intramuscular) administered over the twenty-four hour period (p < 0.05). Four of five subjects clearly preferred analgesia with epidural morphine over the effect of placebo plus therapeutic doses of intramuscular morphine. We conclude that epidural morphine, administered in this manner, is effective in relieving pain after cholecystectomy and that it may be preferred by patients over conventional intramuscular morphine.     

Controlled comparison of nalbuphine and morphine for post-tonsillectomy pain

A controlled investigation was conducted to compare the effectiveness of morphine and nalbuphine in the prevention of pain and restlessness after tonsillectomy in children. Sixty children between 4 and 12 years old were randomly allocated to receive intramuscular morphine 0.2 mg/kg, nalbuphine 0.3 mg/kg or no medication approximately 5 minutes before the conclusion of surgery. Pain and restlessness were assessed 1 and 2 hours after injection, and side effects were recorded. The assessments were made double-blind. Both nalbuphine and morphine decreased restlessness and pain 1 hour (p less than 0.01) and 2 hours (p less than 0.05) after surgery. No significant differences were found between the two groups of patients who received opioids. Both nalbuphine and morphine caused more drowsiness than placebo 2 hours after surgery (p less than 0.001). Other side effects were uncommon. Nalbuphine may offer advantages compared with morphine in regard to safety and convenience of use for the treatment of post-tonsillectomy pain in children.     

Comparison of the relative analgesic efficacies of epidural or intramuscular diamorphine following total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Debate has proliferated as to the true site of action of opioids when placed in the epidural space. The aim of this study was to compare the analgesic effects of a bolus of diamorphine given by the epidural or intramuscular route. METHODS: Sixty patients having elective primary total knee replacements were recruited and randomized to receive epidural or intramuscular diamorphine. A lumbar epidural catheter was sited and 10 mL of bupivacaine 0.5% wt vol-1 was injected. Patients subsequently received diamorphine 5 mg into the epidural space or as an intramuscular injection. Patient-controlled analgesia with intravenous morphine was used for postoperative analgesia. The primary outcome measures included time to first patient-controlled analgesia use and total morphine consumption in 24 h. Secondary end-points considered possible treatment complications. RESULTS: All primary end-points showed significant differences in favour of epidural diamorphine. Medians for times to first patient-controlled analgesia use and total 24 h morphine requirements were significantly different (P < 0.001) at 418 vs. 198 min and 11 vs. 39 mg, respectively. There were no significant differences in secondary end-points. CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown the superior analgesic efficacy of epidural diamorphine when compared to intramuscular injection.     

Reversal of epidural morphine-induced respiratory depression and pruritus with nalbuphine

The effect of nalbuphine on the respiratory depression, pruritus and analgesia induced by epidural morphine was determined in a randomized, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled fashion. Twenty ASA physical status I women received 0.1 mg.kg-1 epidural morphine at induction of general anaesthesia for elective total abdominal hysterectomy. Group 1 (n = 14) received 0.3 mg.kg-1 nalbuphine intravenously six hours after the epidural morphine administration. Group 2 (n = 6) received saline. Prior to agent administration, six patients from the nalbuphine group and four patients from the saline group had respiratory depression indicated by a PaCO2 greater than 45 mmHg. After nalbuphine administration the PaCO2 (mean +/- SE) decreased from 49.5 +/- 1.2 mmHg to 42.5 +/- 0.7 mmHg (p less than 0.005) while there was no significant change after saline administration. Nine of the 14 patients receiving nalbuphine appeared to become more sedated, despite an improvement in ventilation. Pruritus was antagonized by 0.1 mg.kg-1 nalbuphine (p less than 0.006). There was no reversal of analgesia after administration of 0.3 mg.kg-1 nalbuphine.     

Comparison of epidural fentanyl with sufentanil

Duration of analgesia and side effects following single bolus doses of epidural fentanyl (100 micrograms) or sufentanil (10, 20, 30 or 50 micrograms) were studied in 50 patients who underwent Caesarean section under epidural anaesthesia. Fewer patients experienced pain peroperatively in the fentanyl group than in a joint group of those given sufentanil 20 or 30 micrograms (p less than 0.05). The combined fentanyl and sufentanil 50 micrograms groups had fewer patients in pain than the sufentanil 10 micrograms group at 3 hours after injection (p less than 0.05). Patients given fentanyl also had a longer pain-free interval than those who received sufentanil 10 micrograms (p less than 0.02). The sufentanil 50 micrograms group had more patients asleep than the 10 micrograms group and also had more patients with pruritus than the 10 micrograms or 30 micrograms groups (p less than 0.02). The patients given sufentanil 30 and 50 micrograms had more emetic sequelae than those who received sufentanil 10 and 20 micrograms or fentanyl 100 micrograms (p less than 0.05). There was no detectable excretion of drug into breast milk and no significant respiratory depression at the time of first postoperative analgesia in the patients who received fentanyl or 30 micrograms or less of sufentanil.     

Lumbar epidural diamorphine following thoracic surgery

Twenty-two patients received a single dose of diamorphine 5 mg through a lumbar epidural catheter before thoracic surgery. The patients were transferred after surgery to a high dependency unit where they were allocated randomly to receive either an infusion of epidural diamorphine at a rate of 1 mg/hour (group 1) or bolus doses of epidural diamorphine 5 mg on demand (group 2). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in visual analogue pain scores in the first 18 postoperative hours. Arterial carbon dioxide tension was elevated in both groups and was consistently higher in group 1 than in group 2, with a statistically significant intergroup difference 12 hours after operation. Respiratory rate was not a useful index of respiratory depression. The commonest nonrespiratory side effect was urinary retention, but the incidences of this and other minor side effects were similar in the two groups.     

Postoperative pain and pulmonary complications: comparison of three analgesic regimens

In a prospective study, patients undergoing cholecystectomy were randomly allocated to receive (a) intermittent intramuscular morphine (n = 25), (b) continuous intravenous morphine infusion (n = 25) or (c) epidural bupivacaine (n = 25) for postoperative pain relief. Morphine by intravenous infusion provided comparable pain relief to intermittent intramuscular morphine; there was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications. Patients receiving epidural bupivacaine for 12 h had better analgesia than patients receiving morphine (P less than 0.001). Arterial oxygen tensions were also significantly higher in the epidural group for the first three postoperative days (P less than 0.05). Epidural analgesia was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of pulmonary complications (P less than 0.01) and chest infection (P less than 0.05).     

Epidural Morphine for Postoperative Pain Relief

Thirty-three patients were randomly assigned to two groups to study the analgesic potency, duration of action and side effects of epidural and intramuscular morphine after hip surgery. Two milligrams of preservative-free morphine chloride in 10 ml of normal saline in the epidural space was compared to 10 mg of intramuscularly administered morphine. There was a more rapid onset of action after intramuscular morphine. However, the quality of pain relief was substantially higher and the duration of action markedly longer after epidural morphine. The total dose required in the epidural group was 3.6 mg and in the intramuscular group 41 mg during the 15-h observation period. The side effects of epidural morphine were few and mild, the most embarrassing being urinary retention (20 %). Nausea and/or vomiting was less common after epidural morphine (20% versus 55%). Pruritus or respiratory depression which have been reported previously were not encountered. However, it is recommended that preservative-free solutions are used to avoid itching and that the patients are monitored, as respiratory depression may occur long after administration of epidural opiate.     

Effects on gastric emptying of thoracic epidural analgesia with morphine or bupivacaine

The effects of thoracic epidural analgesia on gastric emptying were evaluated in healthy fasting volunteers. In ten volunteers, 4 mg of epidural morphine were injected at the T4 level, and ten volunteers received thoracic epidural analgesia with 0.5% bupivacaine, the latter causing block of the sympathetic innervation to the stomach. Acetaminophen absorption was used as an indirect measure of the rate of gastric emptying. After establishment of the analgesia with bupivacaine, or 160 (110-185) minutes after the administration of epidural morphine, 1.5 g acetaminophen dissolved in water was ingested. Serum samples were taken at 15-minute intervals for 2 hours and serum acetaminophen concentrations were determined by an immunologic method. Control acetaminophen absorption studies without thoracic epidural analgesia were performed in all 20 subjects on another occasion. During epidural analgesia with morphine mean serum acetaminophen concentrations were lower (P less than 0.05), the maximum serum acetaminophen concentration was lower (P less than 0.01), the time taken to reach the maximum concentration was longer (P less than 0.02), and the area under the concentration time curve from 0 to 60 minutes was smaller (P less than 0.01) than in the control study. The corresponding values during epidural analgesia with bupivacaine did not differ from the control values. Four subjects with extremely delayed gastric emptying during epidural analgesia with morphine showed no delay in gastric emptying after receiving 4 mg morphine intramuscularly. Serum morphine concentrations were lower after epidural than after intramuscular morphine. In summary, 4 mg epidural morphine delayed gastric emptying. This was not a systemic effect of morphine. Thoracic epidural analgesia with bupivacaine had no influence on gastric emptying.     

Comparison of lumbar epidural tramadol and lumbar epidural morphine for pain relief after thoracotomy: a repeated-dose study

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare lumbar epidural morphine and lumbar epidural tramadol with respect to onset and duration of analgesia, analgesic efficacy, and drug-related side effects after muscle-sparing thoracotomy. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, clinical study. SETTING: Single university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Forty patients who underwent elective muscle-sparing thoracotomy. INTERVENTIONS: Before anesthesia induction, an epidural catheter was placed in the L2-3 or L3-4 interspace using the loss-of-resistance technique. On arrival at the intensive care unit, patients were randomized to receive doses of either 100 mg of tramadol (group T) or 4 mg of morphine (group M) via the lumbar epidural catheter. Each dose was diluted in 10 mL of normal saline. On awakening from anesthesia, if the patient's pain score on a 0- to 100-mm visual analog scale was above 40 mm, the initial epidural drug dose was administered. The initial injection in each case was taken as time 0. Subsequent pain scores above 40 mm were considered indications for epidural dosing; each patient was allowed 2 doses in the first 12 hours postoperatively and 2 more in the second 12 hours. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The groups' analgesia onset times were similar, but duration of analgesia was significantly shorter in group T than in group M (p < 0.01). There were no differences between the groups with respect to pain scores at rest or during coughing at any of the time points investigated. Sedation scores were lower in group T than in group M at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 8 hours (p value range, 0.0001-0.05). Compared with group T, group M showed significantly greater drops in arterial oxygen tension from baseline at 3, 4, 8, and 12 hours (p value range, 0.0001-0.05). The group means for arterial carbon dioxide tension and respiratory rate were similar at all time points investigated. CONCLUSION: The study revealed that the quality of analgesia achieved with repeated doses of lumbar epidural tramadol after muscle-sparing thoracotomy is comparable to that achieved with repeated doses of lumbar epidural morphine. Compared with morphine, lumbar epidural tramadol results in less sedation and a less-pronounced decrease in oxygenation.     

Side effects during continuous epidural infusion of morphine and fentanyl

Respiratory effects, nausea, somnolence, and pruritus were compared during a 48-hr period of continuous epidural morphine (n = 34) and fentanyl (n = 32) infusion in 66 patients following elective total replacement of the hip or knee joint. Respiratory effects were assessed by PaCO2. Side effects were assessed by visual analogue scale and considered to be present when the score was above 30. Assessment was made at preoperative visits then 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hr after the epidural injection. The bolus dose and subsequent infusion rate were 3,900 +/- 1,300 micrograms and 427 +/- 213 micrograms.hr-1 for morphine, and 85 +/- 46 micrograms and 56 +/- 27 micrograms.hr-1 for fentanyl. Pain relief was similar in both groups. In the morphine group, PaCO2 elevation and nausea occurred over a period of more than 12 hr (P less than 0.05). In the fentanyl group, there was no PaCO2 change, and nausea was confined to the first few hours. Nausea was more severe (P less than 0.01 at six hours and more frequent (24 hr cumulative incidence, 53 vs 28%, P less than 0.05) in the morphine group. Somnolence was prominent within several hours in two-thirds of patients in both groups. Somnolence continued to decline thereafter in the morphine group, but it was demonstrable in approximately half of the patients throughout the second day in the fentanyl group. The incidence was higher in the fentanyl group at the 48th hr (P less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Epidural infusion of low dose bupivacaine after combined spinal-epidural anesthesia using needle through needle method provided no analgesic effect on postoperative pain after caesarian section

BACKGROUND: In order to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of low dose epidural bupivacaine infusion with and without morphine after caesarean section we performed combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) using needle through needle method. Three different epidural analgesic regimens were compared retrospectively. METHODS: The number of analgesic use during 24 hours after operation was compared. Patients were categorized into three groups; group N : intraoperative bolus epidural morphine (2.5 mg) alone, group L : bolus morphine (2.5 mg) plus epidural bupivacaine infusion (32 ml of 0.2% bupivacaine) at a rate of 2.1 ml x hr(-1), group M : bolus morphine (2.4 mg) plus epidural bupivacaine-morphine (33 ml of 0.2% bupivacaine containing morphine 2.3 mg) infusion at a rate of 2.1 ml x hr(-1). Used analgesics included pentazocine 15 mg i.m., diclofenac 25 mg suppo. and loxoprofen 60 mg p.o.. RESULTS: The mean number of analgesic use during the first 24 hours in group M (0.29 +/- 0.46) was significantly smaller than those of group N (0.97 +/- 0.91) and group L (0.84 +/- 0.95). Percentage of patients requiring no analgesic during the first 24 hours was significantly less in group M (70.8%) than in group N (33.4%) and group L (42.1%). CONCLUSIONS: A 2.1 ml x hr(-1) infusion of epidural bupivacaine has no analgesic effect after caesarean section under CSEA using NTN method.     

Postoperative analgesia: epidural injection of dexamethasone sodium phosphate

Epidural administration of steroids has been suggested for the prevention of postoperative epidural fibrosis after lumbar lamino-arthrectomy. In order to assess the efficacy of this technique on pain occurring after such surgery, the demand of pentazocine during the first 24 postoperative hours was studied in 39 patients randomly assigned to two groups. Pain intensity was assessed by a five-point verbal scale (0: none; 1: poor; 2: moderate; 3: severe; 4: very severe) at five intervals (0-4, 5-8, 9-12, 13-16 and 17-24 h). The patients in group T (n = 20) did not receive any steroid, whereas those in group C (n = 19) were given, just after the end of surgery, a single dose of dexamethasone (4 mg) via an epidural lumbar catheter previously inserted by the surgeon. In group T, 18 patients required one or several intramuscular injections of pentazocine, whereas only three patients of group C (p less than 0.001) did so. Patients in group T expressed more severe pain (4 moderate, 12 severe, 3 unbearable) than those patients who had received steroids (1 moderate, 1 severe, 1 unbearable). As a consequence, they requested more pain killer (30 injections vs 8 injections, respectively; p less than 0.001) and sooner than patients of the steroid group (8 h vs 12 h; p less than 0.05). It was concluded that epidural administration of dexamethasone was helpful in preventing postoperative pain after lumbar lamino-arthrectomy.     

Preoperative infiltration of the surgical area enhances postoperative analgesia of a combined low–dose epidural bupivacaine and morphine regimen after upper abdominal surgery

In a randomized, blinded trial we assessed the value of adding preoperative infiltration of the surgical area with bupivacaine to a low dose epidural regimen for postoperative pain treatment. Forty–nine patients scheduled for major upper abdominal surgery during combined thoracic epidural (bupivacaine + morphine) and general anaesthesia were studied. Postoperative analgesia was epidural bupivacaine 10 mg hr^-1 + morphine 0.2 mg hr^-1 for 72 h. The patients randomly received preoperative infiltration of the surgical area with bupivacaine 0.25%, 40 ml (group I); or no infiltration (group II). Pain was evaluated at rest, during cough and during mobilization six and eight h after start of surgery, and at 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. on the following days until 72 h after start of surgery. The sensory level of analgesia was evaluated by pin prick. We found no difference between the two groups during rest and cough. However, during mobilization group I had lower pain scores compared to group II ( P < 0.05). There was a significant reduction in the need for supplemental intramuscular morphine in the treatment group compared to the control group ( P <0.05). Thus an enhanced analgesic effect was demonstrated by adding preoperative infiltration of the surgical area with local anaesthetic to a low dose epidural bupivacaine/morphine regimen after upper abdominal surgery.     

Comparison of epidural methadone with epidural diamorphine for analgesia following caesarean section

Analgesia provided by either 5 mg diamorphine, or 5 mg methadone administered by the epidural route during elective caesarean section was compared in 40 women. The median time to further analgesia in the methadone group was 395 min, and 720 min in the diamorphine group, P = 0.0003. Linear analogue scores to assess pain were measured 2-hourly for 12 h, then again at 24 h postoperatively. Pain scores were significantly lower in the diamorphine group at 8 and 10 h. The median cumulative i.m. morphine dose administered during the first 24 h was 20 mg in the methadone group and 0 mg in the diamorphine group (P = 0.0005). Nausea and pruritis were common side effects in both groups. Continuous pulse oximetry data were available for 12 h post-operatively in 15 patients receiving methadone, and in 17 patients receiving diamorphine. One or more episodes of significant desaturation (<90% for 30 s), occurred in three patients receiving methadone, and in nine patients receiving diamorphine. Desaturation to 90–92% occurred in a further three patients given epidural diamorphine, and in one further patient given epidural methadone.