Risk of nonfatal venous thromboembolism in women using a contraceptive transdermal patch and oral contraceptives containing norgestimate and 35 microg of ethinyl estradiol

CONTEXT: There is concern that a new transdermal contraceptive patch containing ethinyl estradiol (EE) and the progestin norelgestromin increases the risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) compared to previously marketed oral contraceptives (OCs). OBJECTIVE: Quantitative information was obtained on the risk of nonfatal VTE in women using the contraceptive patch in comparison to women using OCs, norgestimate (either monophasic or triphasic) and 35 microg EE (norgestimate-35), an OC that has been marketed for over a decade. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Nested case-control design based on information from PharMetrics, a US-based company that collects and organizes information on claims paid by managed care plans. The study was nested among all women aged 15 to 44, who started either the contraceptive patch or norgestimate-35 after April 1, 2002. Cases were women with current use of one of these two study drugs and a documented diagnosis of VTE in the absence of identifiable clinical risk factors (idiopathic VTE). Up to four controls were matched to each case by age and calendar time. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Odds ratios (ORs) comparing the risk of nonfatal VTE in new users of the two contraceptives and incidence rates of nonfatal VTE for new users of each of the study contraceptives. RESULTS: We identified 68 newly diagnosed, idiopathic cases of VTE in the study population. In the case-control analysis, the OR comparing the contraceptive patch to norgestimate-35 was 0.9 (95% CI 0.5-1.6). The overall incidence rate for VTE was 52.8 per 100,000 women-years (95% CI 35.8-74.9) among users of the contraceptive patch and 41.8 per 100,000 women-years among users of norgestimate-35 (95% CI 29.4-57.6), and the age-adjusted VTE incidence rate ratio (IRR) for current use of the contraceptive patch vs. norgestimate-35 was 1.1 (95% CI 0.7-1.8). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of nonfatal VTE for the contraceptive patch is similar to the risk for OCs containing 35 microg ethinylestradiol and norgestimate.     

Further results on the risk of nonfatal venous thromboembolism in users of the contraceptive transdermal patch compared to users of oral contraceptives containing norgestimate and 35 microg of ethinyl estradiol

CONTEXT: In 2006, we published a study that indicated that the new transdermal contraceptive patch containing ethinyl estradiol (EE) and the progestin norelgestromin did not increase the risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) compared to oral contraceptive containing norgestimate and 35 microg of EE. OBJECTIVE: This report updates information on the risk of nonfatal VTE in women using the contraceptive patch in comparison to women using oral contraceptives containing norgestimate (either monophasic or triphasic) and 35 microg of EE (norgestimate-35) using an additional 17 months of data. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Nested case-control design based on information from PharMetrics, a US-based company that collects and organizes information on claims paid by managed care plans. The study was nested among all women, aged 15 to 44 years, who started either the contraceptive patch or norgestimate-35 after April 1, 2002. Cases were women with current use of one of these two study drugs and a documented diagnosis of VTE in the absence of identifiable clinical risk factors (idiopathic VTE) who were not in the earlier study. Up to four controls were matched to each case by age and calendar time. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Odds ratios (ORs) comparing the risk of nonfatal VTE in new users of the two contraceptives. RESULTS: We identified 56 new cases of newly diagnosed, idiopathic VTE in the updated study population. The OR comparing the contraceptive patch to norgestimate-35 was 1.1 (95% CI 0.6-2.1). CONCLUSIONS: After evaluating an additional 17 months of data, the results indicate that the risk of nonfatal VTE for the contraceptive patch is closely similar to the risk for oral contraceptives containing 35 mug of EE and norgestimate.     

Postmarketing study of ORTHO EVRA and levonorgestrel oral contraceptives containing hormonal contraceptives with 30 mcg of ethinyl estradiol in relation to nonfatal venous thromboembolism

Background

Concern has been raised that the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in users of the ORTHO EVRA^® patch is higher compared to users of oral contraceptives (OCs).

Study Design

We identified idiopathic cases of VTE and controls, matched on age and index date, from among women in the United States PharMetrics/IMS and MarketScan databases who were current users of the patch or levonorgestrel-containing OCs with 30 mcg of ethinyl estradiol. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

The ORs (95% CI) for VTE in users of the patch compared to levonorgestrel-containing OCs were 2.0 (0.9-4.1) and 1.3 (0.8-2.1) in the PharMetrics and MarketScan databases, respectively. ORs (95% CI) restricted to women aged 39 years or younger were 1.4 (0.6-3.0) and 1.2 (0.7-2.0), respectively.

Conclusion

These results provide evidence that the risk of idiopathic VTE in users of the patch is not materially different than that of users of levonorgestrel-containing OCs in women aged 39 years or younger. We cannot rule out some increase in the risk in women aged 40 years or older.     

Treating acne with oral contraceptives: use of lower doses

Oral contraceptives (OCs) have been shown to effectively treat acne. Clinical trials of various doses of ethinyl estradiol (EE) combined with progestins such as levonorgestrel, desogestrel, norgestimate, gestodene, cyproterone acetate and drospirenone in monophasic, triphasic and combiphasic formulations used to treat acne in women are reviewed here. Open-label and comparative studies beginning in the 1980s were the first to demonstrate objective and subjective reductions in the incidence of acne, severity of existing acne and seborrhea. Placebo-controlled trials have corroborated these findings with a trend toward effective acne treatment with declining doses of EE. Significant reductions in total, inflammatory and noninflammatory lesions compared with placebo have been demonstrated with an OC containing the low dose of 20 microg of EE. Collectively, these findings support the use of low-dose OCs for the treatment of acne.     

Efficacy of second versus third generation oral contraceptives in the treatment of hirsutism

OBJECTIVE: To compare second versus third generation combination oral contraceptives (OCs) in the treatment of hirsutism. METHODS: Women with hirsutism, as defined by a minimum Ferriman-Gallwey score of 10, were randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive an OC containing either ethinyl estradiol/desogestrel or ethinyl estradiol/levonorgestrel for 9 months of treatment. Ferriman-Gallwey scores, androgen levels and sex hormone-binding globulin were measured at baseline and every 3 months for the duration of the study. Hormones were measured in duplicate by radioimmunoassay. RESULTS: Of the 47 women enrolled, 24 were randomized to ethinyl estradiol/desogestrel and 23 were randomized to ethinyl estradiol/levonorgestrel. Mean sex hormone-binding globulin increased significantly in subjects using the desogestrel-containing contraceptive compared with the levonorgestrel-containing contraceptive. Ten subjects completed the 9 months of treatment in the levonorgestrel group and 11 completed the study in the desogestrel group. Mean free testosterone and 3alpha-androstanediol glucuronide decreased significantly in the group receiving ethinyl estradiol/desogestrel but not in the ethinyl estradiol/levonorgestrel group. Mean Ferriman-Gallwey scores decreased significantly in both treatment groups. Improvement in mean Ferriman-Gallwey score was 35.7 +/- 38.1% (p < 0.001) for the ethinyl estradiol/desogestrel arm and 33.4 +/- 27.3% (p < 0.001) for the ethinyl estradiol/levonorgestrel arm. There were no statistically significant differences found in the improvement of Ferriman-Gallwey scores between the two treatment arms, although the power to detect a difference was limited by the small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of hirsute women with third generation OCs containing desogestrel results in a significant increase in sex hormone-binding globulin and decrease in free testosterone and 3alpha-androstanediol glucuronide. Both second and third generation OCs were clinically effective in treating hirsutism.     

Risk of venous thromboembolism from oral contraceptives containing gestodene and desogestrel versus levonorgestrel: a meta-analysis and formal sensitivity analysis.

Controversy exists regarding whether oral contraceptives (OCs) containing desogestrel and gestodene are associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) versus OCs containing levonorgestrel. We were interested in synthesizing the available data, exploring explanations for mixed results, and characterizing the degree of uncontrolled confounding that could have produced a spurious association.We performed a meta-analysis and formal sensitivity analysis of studies that examined the relative risk of VTE for desogestrel and gestodene versus levonorgestrel. Twelve studies, all observational, were included. The summary relative risk (95% CI) was 1.7 (1.3-2.1; heterogeneity p = 0.09). If real, the incremental risk of VTE would be about 11 per 100,000 women per year. An association was present when accounting for duration of use and when restricted to the first year of use in new users. However, in the sensitivity analysis, the association abated in many, but not all, scenarios in which an unmeasured confounding factor increased the risk of VTE three to fivefold and in nearly all examined scenarios in which the factor increased the risk 10-fold.The summary relative risk of 1.7 does not appear to be caused by depletion of susceptibles, but is sensitive to a modest degree of unmeasured confounding. Whether such confounding occurred is unknown. However, given this sensitivity, this issue probably cannot be settled unequivocally with observational data. In the absence of a definitive answer, this apparent increased risk, together with its uncertainty and small magnitude and its important consequences, should be considered when selecting an OC for a given woman.     

Use of oral contraceptives containing gestodene and risk of venous thromboembolism: outlook 10 years after the third-generation “pill scare”

Background

This study investigated whether gestodene-containing oral contraceptives (OCs) carry a higher risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) than OCs containing progestins other than desogestrel and gestodene. The study was conducted based on the hypothesis that the biases and confounding factors that were present initially after the introduction of new so-called “third-generation” OCs (i.e., those containing desogestrel and gestodene) in the 1990s, which likely contributed to the alleged increased risk of VTE, may have vanished after 10 years.

Study Design

This was a matched case-control study using data identified for women (aged 15-49 years) with suspected or diagnosed VTE (deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism) that occurred between January 2002 and February 2006 in Austria. All VTE cases were validated by an attending/relevant physician(s), a detailed review of medical records and patient-completed questionnaires. Data were analyzed using an unconditional logistic regression model with adjustment for relevant confounders.

Results

Overall, 451 VTE cases and 1,920 controls without VTE were identified. The adjusted odds ratios for confirmed VTE with OC use versus nonuse were: 3.39 (95% CI 2.36-4.87) for OCs containing gestodene and 3.14 (2.1-4.47) for OCs containing progestins other than desogestrel and gestodene. Adjusted odds ratios for a head-to-head comparison of OCs containing gestodene versus OCs containing progestins other than desogestrel and gestodene were: 0.99 (0.68-1.45) for all cases; 1.01 (0.69-1.47) for confirmed cases and 1.11 (0.73-1.69) for confirmed and idiopathic VTE cases, respectively.

Conclusion

The risk of VTE is not elevated in users of gestodene-containing OCs relative to users of OCs containing progestins other than desogestrel and gestodene. Our study supports the view that (i) the majority of previous results may be explained by differences in the user populations of so-called “third-generation” OCs (containing desogestrel and gestodene) and “second-generation” OCs (containing progestins other than desogestrel and gestodene) that were present shortly after market introduction of gestodene-containing OCs and that (ii) these differences seem to have disappeared over time.     

Drospirenone- and levonorgestrel-containing oral contraceptives and the risk of gallbladder disease

BackgroundStudies have found an association between the use of estrogen-containing oral contraceptives (OCs) and the risk of gallbladder disease. This study evaluated this relation as well as the role of progestogen on the risk of gallbladder disease among users of drospirenone-containing OCs compared to users of levonorgestrel-containing OCs.Study DesignDatabase: The UK General Practice Research Database.We conducted a nested case–control analysis among women aged 14 to 60 years during 2001 through 2008 who had ever received drospirenone- or levonorgestrel-containing OCs. Cases were women with a first diagnosis of gallbladder disease during the study period. Women who received a study OC within 6 months of the index date were exposed. All other women were nonexposed. We matched two controls to each case on year of birth, index date, amount of recorded history and general practice attended.ResultsThe adjusted odds ratio for gallbladder disease comparing drospirenone and levonorgestrel OCs to nonexposure were 0.9 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.7–1.1] and 1.0 (95% CI 0.9–1.1), respectively.ConclusionsThere is no evidence in these data that drospirenone- or levonorgestrel-containing OC use confers an increased risk of gallbladder disease compared to women not currently exposed to an OC. Nor is use of drospirenone OCs associated with a higher risk of gallbladder disease than use of levonorgestrel-containing OCs.     

Oral contraceptives and venous thromboembolism: a five-year national case-control study

The objective of this study was to assess the influence of oral contraceptives (OCs) on the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in young women. A 5-year case-control study including all Danish hospitals was conducted. All women 15-44 years old, suffering a first ever deep venous thrombosis or a first pulmonary embolism (PE) during the period January 1, 1994, to December 30, 1998, were included. Controls were selected annually, 600 per year in 1994-1995 and 1200 per year 1996-1998. Response rates for cases and controls were 87.2% and 89.7%, respectively. After exclusion of nonvalid diagnoses, pregnant women, and women with previous thrombotic disease, 987 cases and 4054 controls were available for analysis. A multivariate, matched analysis was performed. Controls were matched to cases within 1-year age bands. Adjustment was made for confounding influence (if any) from the following variables: age, year, body mass index, length of OC use, family history of VTE, cerebral thrombosis or myocardial infarction, coagulopathies, diabetes, years of schooling, and previous birth.The risk of VTE among current users of OCs was primarily influenced by duration of use, with significantly decreasing odds ratios (OR) over time: <1 year, 7.0 (5.1-9.6); 1-5 years, 3.6 (2.7-4.8); and >5 years, 3.1 (2.5-3.8), all compared with nonusers of OCs. After adjustment for confounders, current use of OCs with second- (levonorgestrel or norgestimate) and third- (desogestrel or gestodene) generation progestins when compared with nonuse resulted in ORs for VTE of 2.9 (2.2-3.8) and 4.0 (3.2-4.9), respectively. After adjusting for progestin types and length of use, the risk decreased significantly with decreasing estrogen dose. With 30-40 microg as reference, 20 and 50 microg products implied ORs of 0.6 (0.4-0.9) and 1.6 (0.9-2.8), respectively (p(trend) = 0.02). After correction for duration of use and differences in estrogen dose, the third/second-generation risk ratio was 1.3 (1.0-1.8; p <0.05). In conclusion, use of OCs was associated significantly to the risk of VTE. The risk among current users was reduced by more than 50% during the first years of use. The risk increased more than 100% with increasing estrogen dose, and the difference in risk between users of third- and second-generation OCs, after correction for length of use and estrogen dose, was 33%.     

Contraceptives and cerebral thrombosis: a five-year national case-control study

The object of this study was to assess the influence of oral contraceptives (OCs) on the risk of cerebral thromboembolic attacks (CTA) including thrombotic stroke and transitory cerebral ischemic attacks. A 5-year case-control study including all Danish hospitals was conducted. All women 15-44 years old suffering a first ever CTA during the period January 1, 1994 to December 31, 1998, were included. Controls were selected annually, 600 per year in 1994-1995, 1200 per year 1996-1998. Response rates for cases and controls were 88% and 90%, respectively. After exclusion of nonvalid diagnoses, pregnant women, and women with previous thrombotic diseases, 626 cases and 4054 controls were available for analysis. A multivariate matched analysis was performed. Controls were matched to cases within 1-year age bands. Adjustments were made for the following potential confounders: year, length of OC use, smoking, hypertension, migraine, family CTA, and years of schooling. There were 212 and 1208 current users of OCs among cases and controls, respectively. The risk of CTA among current users of OCs decreased significantly with decreasing estrogen dose (nonusers reference): OCs with 50 microg, 30-40 microg, 20 microg ethinyl estradiol (EE) and progestin-only pills implied adjusted odds ratios (ORs) (95% CI) of 4.5 (2.6-7.7), 1.6 (1.3-2.0), 1.7 (1.0-3.1), and 1.0 (0.3-3.0), respectively. Current users of OCs with second- (levonorgestrel or norgestimate) and third- (desogestrel or gestodene) generation progestins combined with 20-30 microg EE had ORs of CTA of 2.2 (1.6-3.0) and 1.4 (1.0-1.9), respectively. After correction for differences in estrogen dose, the third- to second-generation risk ratio was 0.6 (0.4-0.9; p = 0.01). In conclusion, high dose OCs and OCs with second-generation progestins were associated with the risk of CTA. The risk increased 2.5 times with estrogen dose increasing from 20 to 50 microg EE, and users of low-dose OCs with second-generation progestins had a 61% higher risk-association of CTA than users of OCs with third-generation progestins.     

The new pills: awaiting the next generation of oral contraceptives.

Even though oral contraceptives (OCs) with the new 3 progestins are the most widely prescribed OCs in the world, especially in Europe, they still are not available to US women. Gestodene's, desogestrel's, and norgestimate's effective daily dose are only 75 mcg, 150 mcg, and 250 mcg, respectively, while the daily dose of norethindrone in OCs used in the US ranges from 350-1000 mcg. The older progestins alter lipid metabolism, thus increasing cardiovascular disease risks. Some studies indicate that the new progestins induce fewer lipid metabolic changes than the older progestins. A 1988 study in West Germany suggests, however, that women who use gestodene may be at increased risk of thromboembolism. Yet, similar research in the UK and also in West Germany did not find this association. There has been concern for many years about OCs' ability to change glucose metabolism and insulin resistance. 5 studies show that OCs with desogestrel cause fewer such disturbances than those with levonorgestrel. 1 study also finds that OCs with gestodene do not alter glucose and insulin levels. On the other hand, 1 study suggests, that OCs with gestodene increase glucose and insulin levels over 6 months. European studies of the new progestins demonstrate their low 1-year method failure rates (gestodene, 0.07/100 users; desogestrel, 0.04/100 users; and norgestimate, [pregnancy rate] 0.25/100 users). Further, the 3 progestins result in a smaller proportion of women who have side effects (breakthrough bleeding or spotting, 3-9%, breast discomfort or headaches, 10-13%). Yet, researchers have not directly compared the effectiveness and acceptability of the 3 new progestins. A legal dispute between 2 pharmaceutical companies prevented the marketing of norgestimate in 1990. 1 company claims patent infringement. The US Food and Drug Administration is now evaluating gestodene and desogestrel. It probably will not approve gestodene until the question of apparent excess of thromboembolism is resolved.     

A comparison of multiphasic oral contraceptives containing norgestimate or desogestrel in acne treatment: a randomized trial

Objective

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of triphasic combined oral contraceptives (OCs) containing ethinyl estradiol (EE) and norgestimate (NGM) and biphasic combined OCs containing EE and desogestrel (DSG) in the treatment of mild to moderate acne.

Study design

This was an investigator-blinded, randomized, parallel group trial conducted at 3 centers in Thailand. Female subjects 18–45 years old were assigned to one or the other OCs and evaluated for efficacy and safety parameters at the baseline visit and after 1, 3 and 6 months of treatment.

Results

Among 201 randomized subjects, data from 93 subjects in the EE/NGM group and 95 subjects in the EE/DSG group were analyzed. After 6 months of treatment with EE/NGM and EE/DSG, no differences between formulations were found for the decrease in total acne lesion counts (74.4% vs. 65.1%, respectively, p=.070) or facial improvement score. More women using EE/NGM showed a decrease in severity of facial seborrhea than those using EE/DSG (p=.005). No changes in weight were noted in either group as compared to baseline.

Conclusion

Multiphasic OCs containing EE/NGM and EE/DSG provided comparable efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of acne. However, EE/NGM had a more beneficial effect on facial seborrhea reduction than EE/DSG.

Implications

EE/NGM and EE/DSG are multiphasic OCs, which were shown to be clinically equally effective for mild to moderate facial acne, and the multiphasic combined OC with NGM was more effective for women with facial seborrhea. Clinicians may apply the results of this study when considering treatment options for facial acne and seborrhea.     

Ovulation incidence with oral contraceptives: a literature review

BACKGROUND AND METHODOLOGY: Combined oral contraceptives (COCs) provide reliable and convenient contraception, although contraindications and tolerability issues may limit their use in some women. Progestogen-only pills (POPs) may be more suitable for some women, however, traditional POPs do not have the same contraceptive efficacy as COCs. A literature search was performed in order to assess the incidence of ovulation with available COCs, traditional POPs and with a desogestrel POP [Cerazette, 75 microg desogestrel (DSG)]. The following databases were searched: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Biosis, Derwent Drug File, Current Contents and the in-house Organon database 'Docs' (which contains all published reports of Organon products). Searches used free-text terms [e.g. Contraceptive$ in combination with (Ovulat$ adj Rate$), (Ovar$ adj Activ$) or (Escap$ adj Ovulat$)] and were limited to the search criteria 'Human' and 'from 1979 onwards'. The searches included publications up to July 2008. RESULTS: Many of the studies were hampered by inadequate ovulation criteria; however, the overall incidence of ovulation determined by the reports uncovered in the literature search was 2.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-3.3] with COCs containing 30-35 microg ethinylestradiol (EE), 1.1% (95% CI 0.60-2.0) with 15-20 microg EE COCs, 4.6% (95% CI 2.8-6.9) with phasic COCs, 1.25% (95% CI 0.03-6.8) with Cerazette and 42.6% (95% CI 33.4-52.2) with traditional POPs. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that COCs and the desogestrel POP are equally effective in suppressing ovulation, whilst the traditional POP formulations are less effective.     

The effects of two progestogen-only pills containing either desogestrel (75 microg/day) or levonorgestrel (30 microg/day) on lipid metabolism.

The effects of two progestogen-only pills (POPs) containing either desogestrel (75 microg/day) or levonorgestrel (30 microg/day) on lipid metabolism were compared in a double-blind, randomized study in Sweden and Finland. Eighty-one healthy female volunteers received either desogestrel 75 microg/day or levonorgestrel 30 microg/day for seven treatment periods of 28 days. The following lipid parameters were measured at screening and at treatment Periods 3 and 7: total cholesterol, total triglycerides, HDL-cholesterol, HDL(2)-cholesterol, HDL(3)-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, apolipoprotein A-I, apolipoprotein A-II, apolipoprotein B, lipoprotein (a), and the carrier proteins sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) and cortisol-binding globulin. Overall, both study medications had similar, minimal effects on lipid metabolism. To summarize, compared with pre-treatment, no changes were observed for LDL-cholesterol and its protein fraction apolipoprotein B. The concentrations of total cholesterol and triglycerides decreased marginally. Decreasing trends were also seen for lipoprotein (a), HDL-cholesterol and its subfractions, HDL(2)-cholesterol and HDL(3)-cholesterol, and the apolipoproteins, apolipoprotein A-I and apolipoprotein A-II. The results indicated no significant differences between the groups in any of the parameters, with the exception of a smaller decrease in HDL(3)-cholesterol at treatment Period 7 for the desogestrel-containing POP compared with the levonorgestrel-containing POP and a significant difference between the two treatments for lipoprotein (a) at Period 3. The serum concentration of the carrier protein SHBG was found to be slightly higher in the desogestrel group, which may be a manifestation of the higher androgenicity of levonorgestrel compared with desogestrel. It can be concluded that the POP containing 75 microg desogestrel has a negligible effect on lipid metabolism. Despite the higher progestogen dose, the effect of this new POP is similar to that of a traditional POP containing 30 microg levonorgestrel.     

A cross-over study of three oral contraceptives containing ethinyloestradiol and either desogestrel or levonorgestrel

A randomised cross-over trial was performed to compare the pharmacodynamic actions of three low-dose oral contraceptives (OCs): Marvelon (150μg desogestrel (DSG) + 30μg ethinyloestradiol (EE)), Mercilon (150μg DSG + 20μg EE) and Microgynon (150μg levonorgestrel (LNG) + 30μg EE). None of the OCs produced any significant changes in serum cholesterol, LDL-C and apoprotein B. Triglycerides were increased by the desogestrel OCs but not by Microgynon. The latter however increased the glucose and insulin responses to a glucose tolerance test whereas Marvelon and Mercilon had no effect. HDL-C increased with Marvelon, was unchanged with Mercilon and was decreased with Microgynon. Apoprotein AII was increased by all three OCs but only the DSG OCs increased apoprotein AI. All OCs produced similar increases in caeruloplasmin but the increase in SHBG was much greater with Marvelon and Mercilon than with Microgynon. Testosterone was reduced more with Microgynon than with the DSG OCs. Many of the changes reflect the strong anti-oestrogenic action of LNG on metabolic parameters compared to DSG. Except for the effect on HDL-C, there was little difference between Marvelon and Mercilon on metabolic parameters and this complements the findings from large-scale clinical trials of the two OCs. Mercilon, therefore, provides a very satisfactory alternative to Marvelon.     

A comparative study of monophasic oral contraceptives containing either drospirenone 3 mg or levonorgestrel 150 microg on premenstrual symptoms

This open-label randomized study compared the effects of two combined oral contraceptives (OCs) containing 3 mg drospirenone (DRSP)/30 microg ethinyl estradiol (EE) with 150 microg levonorgestrel (LNG)/30 microg EE on the prevalence and changes from baseline of premenstrual symptoms after six cycles. The symptoms were measured using the Women's Health Assessment Questionnaire. Subjects receiving DRSP/EE had fewer prevalence of premenstrual symptoms than those receiving LNG/EE after six cycles. A significantly lower score of negative affect category in the premenstrual phase was demonstrated in those receiving DRSP/EE more than LNG/EE. The DRSP/EE group showed a greater improvement of mean scores from baseline in the premenstrual phase compared with those who received LNG/EE on negative affect as seen in the items on anxiety, irritability, feeling sad or blue and weight gain in the category of water retention. In conclusion, OCs containing DRSP have beneficial effects in reducing the prevalence of premenstrual symptoms especially the symptoms of negative affect and weight gain, particularly when compared to LNG/EE. Hence, it should be recommended for women who are susceptible to these adverse symptoms.     

Venous thromboembolic disease in users of low-estrogen combined estrogen-progestin oral contraceptives

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between venous thromboembolic disease (VTE) and use of low-estrogen dose (<50 microg) combined estrogen-progestin oral contraceptives (OC) and three thrombosis-related gene mutations in a United States population. DESIGN: This case-control study was conducted in 1998-2000 among women ages 15-44 years who were members of the Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program [KPMCP] (Northern and Southern California). Cases were women with incident VTE; about three times as many women frequency matched for age were randomly selected as controls from the KPMCP membership in the same years. Data were collected in a 1 h face-to-face interview; blood was drawn to extract DNA to test for gene polymorphisms. The analysis data set comprised 196 cases (mean age 35.3 years) and 746 controls (mean age 36.2 years). RESULTS: The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for VTE associated with current OC use was 4.07 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.77-6.00). The OR associated with OC use was higher for women who were obese than in the nonobese (p = 0.01 for likelihood test for interaction) and in women without predisposing medical conditions (p = 0.02 for interaction). The adjusted OR for VTE was 7.10 (95% CI: 2.33-21.61) in women with factor V Leiden (G1691A) mutation, 2.83 (95% CI: 0.70-11.63) in women with prothrombin G20210A mutation and 0.26 (95% CI: 0.10-0.65) in women with the MTHFR C677T mutation. The OR for VTE in OC users with factor V Leiden mutation (11.32) was elevated more than in OC users without the mutation (3.20) and women with the mutation who were non-OC users (8.42), but confidence intervals overlapped. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of VTE is increased in users of low-estrogen OC formulations. Obese women appear to be at greater risk of VTE when using OCs.     

Effect of four oral contraceptives on hemostatic parameters

This is the first double-blind, controlled, randomized study comparing the effect of different estrogen components in oral contraceptives (OCs) on hemostasis variables. Four groups of 25 women each were treated for six cycles with monophasic combinations containing 21 tablets with either 30 microg ethinylestradiol (EE) + 2 mg dienogest (DNG) (30EE/DNG), 20 microg EE + 2 mg DNG (20EE/DNG), 10 microg EE + 2 mg estradiol valerate (EV) + 2 mg DNG (EE/EV/DNG) or 20 microg EE + 100 microg levonorgestrel (LNG) (EE/LNG). Blood samples were taken on Days 21-26 of the control cycle and on Days 18-21 of the first, third and sixth treatment cycle. Treatment with all four OCs caused an increase in levels of fibrinogen, prothrombin fragment 1+2, D-dimer, plasminogen, plasmin-antiplasmin complex and an increase in protein C activity, a decrease in antithrombin activity, tissue-plasminogen activator (t-PA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI), and a slight decrease in the sensitivity to activated protein C, but no significant change in that of the thrombin-antithrombin complex. In users of the DNG-containing OCs, the reduction in total and free protein S, and in t-PA and PAI was dependent on the EE dose, while factor VII activity was elevated, but not significantly different from EE/LNG. The results are in agreement with those of previous studies. The effects of EE/EV/DNG on total and free protein S and on t-PA and PAI were lower than those of 20EE/DNG, suggesting that the impact of 2 mg EV on several hemostasis variables is less than that of 10 microg EE. The results show an antagonistic effect of LNG on the EE-induced rise of factor VII activity and fragment 1+2 and on the EE-dependent reduction of total and free protein S.     

Plasma hormone levels in women receiving new oral contraceptives containing ethinyl estradiol plus levonorgestrel or desogestrel

The changes in plasma hormone levels were evaluated in matched healthy female volunteers investigated before and after 6 months' use of three new oral contraceptives (OCs): Trigynon^R (n = 13), a triphasic OC containing low doses of ethinylestradiol (EE) + levonorgestrel (LNg); Marvelon^R (n = 14), a monophasic OC containing low doses of EE + desogestrel (DOG, a new progestogen derived from LNg); and Ovidol^R (n = 10), a sequential OC containing higher doses (50 νg) of EE + DOG. Serum levels of FSH, LH, estradiol and progesterone were decreased in all cases to levels incompatible with ovulation. Prolactin concentrations were unchanged. Sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) and Transcortin (CBG) levels were significantly increased by all three OCs (Ovidol>Marvelon>Trigynon); free testosterone levels decreased significantly while free cortisol concentrations remained unchanged.

Collectively, these data indicate that (a) all three OCs are effective ovulation inhibitors, (b) Ovidol and Marvelon have greater estrogenic effects than Trigynon, (c) LNg is more effective than DOG in reducing the EE-induced increase in SHBG levels, and (d) free testosterone levels are equally well suppressed by all three Ocs.