Comparison of decompression,decompression plus fusion,and decompression plus stabilization: a long-term follow-up of a prospective,randomized study

BACKGROUND CONTEXTLumbar canal stenosis due to degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis is one of the most common indications for lumbar spinal surgery. However, from a long-term perspective, it is still unclear which of these procedures should be performed: decompression, decompression plus fusion, or decompression plus stabilization.PURPOSEThis study aimed to present the long-term results of a randomized controlled trial of surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis.STUDY DESIGN/SETTINGThis is a long-term follow-up of a previously reported randomized controlled trial.PATIENT SAMPLEPatients aged ≤75 years with single L4/5 level lumbar canal stenosis caused by degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis were enrolled at two hospitals from May 1, 2003, to April 30, 2012; the final follow-up was on May 20, 2021.OUTCOME MEASURESThe following data were collected: modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, visual analog scale (VAS) score for lower back pain, leg pain, and numbness, and scores from eight Short-Form 36 (SF-36) subscales preoperatively, 1 year postoperatively, 5 years postoperatively, and at the final follow-up.METHODSPatients were randomized to undergo decompression alone, decompression plus fusion, or decompression plus stabilization. The primary outcome measure was the change in VAS for lower back pain with secondary outcomes including the modified JOA score, VAS for leg pain, VAS for leg numbness, eight SF-36 subscale scores, and occurrence of reoperation at the last follow-up.RESULTSAmong 85 patients who were randomized, 66 responded to the current survey. The mean follow-up period was 12.3 years. The VAS score for low back pain improvement was not significantly different between the decompression and fusion groups at the mean follow-up of 12.3 years. Of the 12 secondary outcomes, 8 showed no significant difference between decompression and fusion, 12 showed no significant difference between decompression and stabilization, and 10 showed no significant difference between fusion and stabilization.CONCLUSIONSAlthough additional instrumentation surgery did not significantly improve low back pain at the mean follow-up of 12.3 years compared with decompression alone, fusion surgery provided clinically meaningful improvements in patient-reported vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, and mental health compared with decompression alone.TRIAL REGISTRATIONUMIN000028114     

Objective outcome measures may demonstrate continued change in functional recovery in patients with ceiling effects of subjective patient-reported outcome measures after surgery for lumbar degenerative disorders

Background ContextThe 6-minute walking test (6WT) has been previously shown to be a reliable and valid outcome measure. It is unclear if the 6WT may further help to detect differences in well performing patients that reach a ceiling effect in PROMs after surgery.PurposeTo evaluate changes and timing of change in objective functional impairment (OFI) as measured with the smartphone-based 6WT in relation to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after surgery for degenerative lumbar disorders (DLD).Study designProspective observational cohort study.Patient SampleFifty consecutive patients undergoing surgery for DLD.Outcome MeasuresPatients self-determined their OFI using the 6WT application (6WT-app) and completed a set of paper-based PROMs before, 6 weeks and 3 months after surgery.MethodsFifty patients undergoing surgery for DLD were assessed preoperatively (baseline), 6 weeks (6W) and 3 months (3M) postoperatively. Paired sample t-tests were used to establish significant changes in raw 6-minute walking distance (6WD) and standardized Z-scores, as well as PROMs. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to define the relationship between 6WT and PROMs. Floor and ceiling effects were assessed for each PROM (visual analogue scale [VAS], core outcome measure index [COMI], Zurich claudication questionnaire [ZCQ]).ResultsMean 6WT results improved from 377 m (standard deviation - SD 137; Z-score: 1.8, SD 1.8) to 490 m (SD 126; -0.7, SD 1.5) and 518 m (SD 112; -0.4, SD 1.41; all p<.05) at 6W and 3M follow-up. No significant improvement was observed between 6W and 3M for the ZCQ, VAS back and leg pain. While correlation between 6WT and all PROMs were weak at baseline, correlation coefficient increased to moderate at 3M. A considerable ceiling effect (best possible score) was observed, most notably for the ZCQ physical performance, VAS back and leg pain in 24%, 20%, and 16% of patient at 6W and in 30%, 24%, and 28% at 3M.ConclusionSObjective functional tests can describe the continued change in the physical recovery of a patient and may help to detect differences in well performing groups as well as in cases where patients' PROM results cannot further improve because of a ceiling effect.     

Biportal endoscopic versus microscopic discectomy for lumbar herniated disc: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND CONTEXTBiportal endoscopic discectomy has been frequently performed in recent years and has shown acceptable clinical outcomes. However, evidence regarding its efficacy and safety remains limited.PURPOSEThis study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of biportal endoscopic with that of open microscopic discectomy in patients with single-level herniated lumbar discs.STUDY DESIGNProspective, randomized, multicenter, open-label, assessor-blind, non-inferiority controlled trial.PATIENT SAMPLESixty-four participants suffering from low back and leg pain with a single-level herniated lumbar disc and required discectomy.OUTCOME MEASURESOutcomes were assessed with the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), visual analog scale (VAS) pain score for surgical site, low back and lower extremity, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for lumbar disabilities, European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions value for quality of life, and painDETECT for neuropathic pain. Surgery-related outcomes such as hospital stay, operation time, and opioid usage were collected. Adverse events occurring during the follow-up period were also noted.METHODSAll participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo biportal endoscopic (biportal group) or microscopic discectomy (microscopy group). The primary outcome was the difference in ODI scores at 12-months post surgically based on a modified intention-to-treat strategy, with a non-inferiority margin of 12.8 points. The secondary outcomes included PROMs, surgery-related outcomes, and adverse events.RESULTSThe ODI score at the 12-month follow-up was 11.97 in the microscopy group and 13.89 in the biportal group (mean difference, 1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], -3.50 to 7.34), showing the non-inferiority of biportal group. The results for the secondary outcomes were similar to those for the primary outcome. Creatinine phosphokinase ratios were low in the biportal group. Early surgical site pain was slightly lower in the biportal group (mean difference of VAS pain score at 48-hr, -0.98; 95% CI, -1.77 to -0.19). Adverse events including reoperation showed no significant difference between the groups.CONCLUSIONBiportal endoscopic discectomy was non-inferior to microscopic discectomy over a 12 month period. Biportal endoscopic discectomy is suggested to be a relatively safe and effective surgical technique with the slight advantage of reduced muscle damage. However, the clinical implications of surgical site pain should be carefully considered.     

Intradural Disc Herniation in the Setting of Congenital Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

IntroductionAccounting for an estimated 1.10-1.76% of all lumbar herniations, lumbar intradural disc herniation (IDH) occurs primarily in males during the fourth to fifth decades of life. While not validated, congenital lumbar spinal stenosis (CLSS) is implicated as one precipitating factor for IDH.Case reportWe report 28-year-old Hispanic female with CLSS, severe obesity, and degenerative disk disease, with a history of minimally invasive surgical (MIS) decompression for a large paracentral L4-5 disc herniation at 25. After three years, the patient developed sudden burning dysesthesias in the L4-5 dermatomes bilaterally and temporary leg weakness. Lumbar magnetic resonance imaging exhibited severe L4-5 spinal stenosis, and the patient underwent repeat MIS decompression, which again provided her with adequate symptom resolution. However, 20 days postoperatively she developed cauda equina syndrome with anal dysfunction, and bilateral leg and foot weakness. Upon open surgical exploration we discovered a tense L4-5 dural protrusion. After a dorsal durotomy, a large IDH with a ventral dural tear was identified. Subsequent to adequate debulking of the IDH, the ventral tear was repaired, and an expansile duraplasty was performed. Overall, the patient's bladder and bowel function, pain, hypoesthesia, and motor strength all improved. Two weeks after surgery she presented with a lumbar pseudomeningocele that was managed conservatively.ConclusionThis report not only highlights an atypical presentation of IDH and is the first case of CLSS linked with IDH, lending support to the hypothesis that CLSS can lead to IDH, but also provides a comprehensive review of IDHs.     

Impact of gender on outcomes following single-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion

BackgroundThere have been a multitude of studies attempting to identify the relationship between gender and postoperative outcomes; however, few studies have examined how this relationship may affect outcomes after anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) surgery. We aim to better characterize the impact that self-reported gender may have on patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and achievement rates of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) after ALIF.MethodsA retrospective database of a single spine surgeon was searched for patients who had undergone single-level ALIF. Indications for surgery including acute trauma, infection, or malignancy were excluded. The population was separated into cohorts by self-reported gender, female or male. PROMs were recorded and compared within groups to their preoperative baselines and between groups. MCID achievement rate was compared between groups.Results140 patients were identified for this study, with 68 patients self-identifying as female gender. The male gender cohort was found to have a significantly greater prevalence of hypertension (p = 0.018). Both cohorts showed significant improvement during at least one or more postoperative time points for each evaluated outcome measure (p ≤ 0.048, all). No significant difference in mean PROM scores was noted between cohorts at any time point for any measured outcome. The female gender cohort had significantly greater MCID achievement rates for visual acuity scale (VAS) back pain overall and at the 6-month time point (p ≤ 0.043, both). The female gender cohort also had significantly greater achievement of MCID at the 1-year time point for VAS leg pain (p = 0.017).ConclusionBoth female and male gender cohorts demonstrated significant improvement in all outcomes measured at one or more postoperative time points. Postoperative outcomes did not differ by gender. MCID achievement was more common in female patients. Female patients may experience more tangible clinical improvement after ALIF compared to male patients.     

Epidural hemostasis by autologous fat graft in minimally invasive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: In vivo experimental study

BackgroundEpidural hemostasis needs to use small, adapted material in minimally invasive surgery, including bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach for lumbar spinal stenosis. Most surgeons avoid external material for hemostasis because of possible neural tissue damage or complications. We compared epidural hemostasis in minimally invasive surgery by fat graft versus gelatin sponge.MethodsThe design was a prospective randomized controlled in-vivo human experimental study. The 24 levels operated on for lumbar spinal stenosis were evaluated in two groups: Group A (control group: gelatin sponge) and Group B (experimental group: fat graft). International Normalized Ratio and Prothrombin Time were assessed preoperatively. Number of cotton hemostats and systolic and diastolic blood pressure were assessed intraoperatively. Epidural hemorrhage area, spinal cord size and ratio of epidural hemorrhage area to spinal cord size were evaluated on early postoperative lumbar MRI.ResultsMean epidural hemorrhage area in groups A and B was respectively 1.3 ± 0.5 and 1.2 ± 0.6 cm², and mean spinal cord size 1.2 ± 0.6 and 1.8 ± 0.6 cm² on early postoperative axial lumbar MRI. The two groups did not significantly differ in ratio of epidural hemorrhage/spinal cord size or number of intraoperative hemostats (P = 0.36, and P = 0.71).ConclusionsThe autologous fat graft ensured sufficient and safe epidural hemostasis without serious adverse events in minimally invasive spinal surgery, and is preferable as autologous tissue is easily and quickly harvested. The surgeon feels safe with this technique and does not need external hemostatic agents.     

Anxiety and depression are associated with poor outcomes in open elbow arthrolysis

BackgroundOpen elbow arthrolysis (OEA) is an established treatment for posttraumatic elbow stiffness (PTES); however, its efficacy is debatable for some patients. Poor surgical outcomes have been associated with anxiety and depression in other orthopedic conditions, but no studies have examined this association in OEA. In this study, we aimed to determine whether a high preoperative anxiety and depression score is associated with a worse functional outcome in OEA for PTES.MethodsA retrospective review of prospectively collected data was carried out in patients undergoing OEA between April 2021 and March 2022. Mental state evaluated by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), subjective elbow function valued by Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, objective elbow function valued by Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), pain score measured by visual analog scale (VAS) and the flexion-extension range of motion (ROM) of the affected elbow were collected before and after surgery in outpatient clinic follow-up at 3 months and 6 months. Patient satisfaction was only recorded 6 months postoperatively. All patients were divided into 2 groups based on the preoperative HADS score for analysis: Group A was the nonanxiety-depression group, and Group B was the anxiety-depression group.ResultsA total of 49 patients were included. Both groups improved in DASH, MEPS and ROM at 3 months and at 6 months. The HADS score in Group B decreased significantly at 6 months, showing that the mental state of patients in Group B improved after surgery. Group A had a lower DASH at 3 months and 6 months, larger 6-month ROM and higher satisfaction rate than Group B. Comparing the differences between preoperative and postoperative measurements, Group A improved more in ROM at 6 months. There was no significant difference in other outcome measures between the two groups.ConclusionsOEA is a safe and effective treatment for PTES, and can achieve good clinical outcomes in the short-term follow-up, regardless of whether the patients suffer from anxiety or depression. Patients with a HADS score ≥11 before OEA, however, have worse outcomes than those with a HADS score <11.Level of evidenceLevel II; Retrospective Design; Prognosis Study     

Awake spinal anesthesia facilitates spine surgery in poor surgical candidates: A case series

BackgroundAnnually, hundreds of thousands of patients undergo surgery for degenerative spine disease (DSD). This represents only a fraction of patients that present for surgical consideration. Procedures are often avoided due to comorbidities that make patients poor candidates for general anesthesia (GA) and its associated risks. With increasing interest in awake surgery under spinal anesthesia (SA), the authors have observed that SA may facilitate spine surgery in patients with relative contraindications to GA. With this in mind, the authors set out to summarize the outcomes of a series of highly comorbid patients who received surgery under SA.MethodsCase logs of a single surgeon were reviewed, and patients undergoing spine surgery under SA were identified. Within this group, patients were identified with relative contraindications to GA, such as advanced age and medical comorbidities. For these patients, for whom surgery was facilitated by SA, the medical records were consulted to report demographic information and patient outcomes.ResultsTen highly comorbid patients were identified who received lumbar spine surgery for DSD under SA. Comorbidities included octogenarian status, obesity, and chronic health conditions such as heart disease. The cohort had a mean age of 75.5 and a mean American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) score of 3.1. The patients were predicted to have a 2.74-fold increase of serious complications compared to the average patient. There were no adverse events.ConclusionFor patients with symptomatic, refractory DSD and relative contraindications to GA, SA may facilitate safe surgical intervention with excellent outcomes.     

The impact of long-term corticosteroid use on acute postoperative complications following lumbar decompression surgery

BackgroundCorticosteroids have a negative impact on the human immune system’s ability to function at an optimal level. Studies have shown that patients on long-term corticosteroids have higher infection rates. However, the rates of infection and other complications following lumbar decompression surgery remains under-investigated. The aim of our study was to determine the impact of preoperative long-term corticosteroid usage on acute, 30-day postoperative complications in a subset of patients undergoing lumbar spine decompression surgery, without fusion or instrumentation. We hypothesize that patients on long-term corticosteroids will have higher rates of infection and other postoperative complications after undergoing lumbar decompression surgery of the spine.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted using data collected from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database data from 2005 to 2016. Lumbar decompression surgeries, including discectomies, laminectomies, and others were identified using CPT codes. Chi-square analysis was used to evaluate differences among the corticosteroid and non-corticosteroid groups for demographics, preoperative comorbidities, and postoperative complications. Logistic regression analysis was done to determine if long-term corticosteroid use predicts incidence of postoperative infections following adjustment.Results26,734 subjects met inclusion criteria. A total of 1044 patients (3.9%) were on long-term corticosteroids prior to surgical intervention, and 25,690 patients (96.1%) were not on long-term corticosteroids. Patients on long-term corticosteroids were more likely to be older (p < 0.001), female (p < 0.001), nonsmokers (p < 0.001), and have a higher American Society of Anesthesiologist class (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that long-term corticosteroid usage was associated with increased overall complications (odds ratio [OR]: 1.543; p < 0.001), and an independent risk factor for the development of minor complications (OR: 1.808; p < 0.001), urinary tract infection (OR: 2.033; p = 0.002), extended length of stay (OR: 1.244; p = 0.039), thromboembolic complications (OR: 1.919; p = 0.023), and sepsis complications (OR: 2.032; p = 0.024).ConclusionLong-term corticosteroid usage is associated with a significant increased risk of acute postoperative complication development, including urinary tract infection, sepsis and septic shock, thromboembolic complications, and extended length of hospital stay, but not with superficial or deep infection in patients undergoing lumbar decompression procedures. Spine surgeons should remain vigilant regarding postoperative complications in patients on long-term corticosteroids, especially as it relates to UTI and propensity to decompensate into sepsis or septic shock. Thromboembolic risk attenuation is also imperative in this patient group during the postoperative period and the surgeon should weigh the risks and benefits of more intensive anticoagulation measures.     

Frailty measured by risk analysis index and adverse discharge outcomes after adult spine deformity surgery: analysis of 3104 patients from a prospective surgical registry (2011–2020)

Background ContextMeasurement of frailty with the Risk Analysis Index (RAI) has demonstrated improved outcome prediction compared to other frailty indices across the surgical literature. However, the generalizability and clinical utility of preoperative RAI scoring for prediction of postoperative morbidity after adult spinal deformity surgery is presently unknown. Thus, recent studies have called for an RAI analysis of spine deformity outcomes.PurposeThe present study sought to evaluate the discriminatory accuracy of preoperative frailty, as measured by RAI, for predicting postoperative morbidity among adult spine deformity surgery patients using data queried from a large prospective surgical registry representing over 700 hospitals from 49 US states and 11 countries.Study Design/SettingSecondary analysis of a prospective surgical registry.Patient SampleAmerican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database (2011–2020).Outcome MeasuresThe primary endpoint was “adverse discharge outcome” (ADO) defined as discharge to a non-home, non-rehabilitation nursing/chronic care facility.MethodsAdult spine deformity surgeries were queried from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database (2011–2020) using diagnosis and procedure codes. The relationship between increasing preoperative RAI frailty score and increasing rate of primary endpoint (ADO) was assessed with Cochran-Armitage linear trend tests. Discriminatory accuracy was tested by computation of concordance statistics (with 95% confidence interval [CI]) in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.ResultsA total of 3104 patients underwent spine deformity surgery and were stratified by RAI score: 0–10: 22%, 11–15: 11%, 16–20: 29%, 21–25: 26%, 26–30: 8.0%, 31–35: 2.4%, and 36+: 1.4%. The rate of ADO was 14% (N=439/3094). The rate of ADO increased significantly with increasing RAI score (p<.0001). RAI demonstrated robust discriminatory accuracy for prediction of ADO in ROC analysis (C-statistic: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.69–0.74, p<.001). In pairwise comparison of ROC curves (DeLong test), RAI demonstrates superior discriminatory accuracy compared to the 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5; p<.001).ConclusionPreoperative frailty, as measured by RAI, is a robust predictor of postoperative morbidity (measured by ADO) after adult spine deformity surgery. The frailty score may be translated directly to the bedside with a user-friendly risk calculator, deployed here: https://nsgyfrailtyoutcomeslab.shinyapps.io/spineDeformity     

Arthroscopic knee debridement in osteoarthritis in the older age can be satisfactory

IntroductionKnee arthroscopy is one of the treatments for knee pain. In recent years, the use of knee arthroscopy in the treatment of osteoarthritis was challenged by several randomized-controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses. However, some design flaws are making the clinical decision harder. This study specifically explores the patient satisfaction from these surgeries to aid in clinical decision.HypothesisKnee arthroscopy can relieve symptoms and delay further surgical treatment in the older age.Patients & methodsFifty patients accepted participation and were invited to a follow-up examination eight years post knee arthroscopy. All patients were above age 45 and diagnosed with degenerative meniscus tear and osteoarthritis. The patients filled follow-up questionnaires of function (WOMAC, IKDC, SF-12) and pain. The patients were asked to appreciate if they would have repeated the surgery retrospectively. The results were compared to a previous data base.ResultsThirty-six patients (72%) reported satisfaction of 8 and above (scale of 0–10) from the surgery and would have repeated it. A higher SF-12 physical score pre-surgery predicted a higher satisfaction rate (p = 0.027). Patients who were more satisfied from the surgery improved post-surgery in all parameters compared with the less-satisfied group (p < 0.001). Patients above the age 60 had similar parameters pre- and post-surgery compared with patients under the age 60 (p > 0.05).ConclusionsPatients between the ages 46–78 with degenerative meniscus tear and osteoarthritis felt they benefited from knee arthroscopy in an eight-year follow-up and would repeat the surgery. Our research may help with better patient selection and suggest knee arthroscopy can relive symptoms and delayed further surgical treatment for the older patient with clinical symptoms and signs of meniscus related pain, mild osteoarthritis, and failed conservative treatment.Level of evidenceIV.     

潜行减压单侧改良TLIF手术治疗腰椎退行性疾患的初步疗效

目的：观察椎管潜行减压单侧改良经椎间孔腰椎间融合术（transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion,TLIF）手术治疗腰椎退行性疾病的临床疗效。方法：自2009年8月至2011年12月,采用椎管潜行减压单侧改良TLIF手术治疗腰椎退行性疾病患者28例,其中男16例,女12例;年龄46-71岁,平均61岁;病程6个月-6年。腰椎管狭窄症20例,腰椎间盘突出症8例。潜行减压范围：单节段24例,双节段4例。左侧15例,右侧13例。采用JOA下腰痛评分系统（29分）评价手术前后临床症状、体征及括约肌功能;并采用视觉模拟评分（VAS）评估手术前后腰腿痛情况。结果：28例患者获随访,时间6-28个月,平均14个月。术后JOA、VAS评分（17.9±2.2、2.8±0.7）与术前（8.5±1.7、8.6±1.2）比较有明显改善（P〈0.05）。28例患者椎间均达到骨性融合。结论：采用椎管潜行减压单侧改良TLIF手术治疗单侧根性症状的腰椎管狭窄症、腰椎间盘突出症,具有创伤小、疗效确切的优点;能明显节省医疗费用,值得临床研究推广。     

Current state of benefits of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in spinal surgeries: A systematic review of the literature

IntroductionRecent years have been characterized by a great technological and clinical development in spine surgery. In particular, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs, started to gain interest also in this surgical field. Here we tried to analyse the current state of art of ERAS technique in spine surgery.Material and methodA systematic review of the literature has been performed in order to find all the possible inclusions. Using the PRISMA guidelines, a search of the PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Reviews, Embase, Medline databases was conducted to identify all full-text articles in the English-language literature describing the use of ERAS programs or techniques for spine surgery in adult patients.ResultsOut of the 827 studies found, only 21 met the inclusion criteria has been retained to be included in the present study. The most frequently benefits of ERAS protocols were shorter hospitalisations (n = 15), and decreased complication rates (n = 8) lower postoperative pain scores (n = 4). These benefits were seen in the 3 main categories considered: lumbar spine surgeries, surgeries for correction of scoliosis or deformity, and surgeries of the cervical spine.ConclusionThere are an arising amount of data showing that the use of ERAS programs could be helpful in reducing the days of hospitalizations and the number of complications for certain spinal procedures and in a highly selected group of patients. Despite the large interest on the topic; there is an important lack of high level of scientific evidences. Because of that, there is the need to encourage the design and creation of new randomized clinical trials that will validate the present findings.     

To fuse or not to fuse: The elderly patient with lumbar stenosis and low-grade spondylolisthesis. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

BackgroundThe optimum surgical intervention for elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and low-grade degenerative-spondylolisthesis (LGDS) has been extensively debated. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised-controlled-trials (RCTs) comparing the effectiveness of decompression-alone against the gold-standard approach of decompression-with-fusion (D + F) in elderly patients with LSS and LGDS.MethodsA systematic literature search was performed on published databases from inception to October-2021. English-language RCTs of elderly patients (mean age over-65) with LSS and LGDS, who had undergone DA or D + F were included. The quality and weight of evidence was assessed, and a meta-analysis performed.ResultsSix RCTs (n = 531; mean age: 66.2 years; 57.8% female) were included. There was no difference in visual-analogue-scale (VAS) scores of back-pain (BP) or leg-pain (LP) at mean follow-up of 27.4 months between both DA and D + F groups (BP: mean-difference (MD)0.24, 95%CI: ?0.38–0.85; LP MD:0.39, 95%CI: ?0.34–1.11). No difference in disability, measured by Oswestry-Disability-Index scores, was found between both groups (MD:0.50, 95%CI: ?3.31–4.31). However, patients in DA group had less hospital complications and fewer adverse events (total-surgical-complications OR:0.57, 95%CI: 0.36–0.90), despite a higher rate of worsening DS (OR:3.49, 95%CI: 1.05–11.65). No difference in BP or LP was found in subgroup-analysis of open-laminectomy compared to posterolateral-fusion (PLF) (BP: MD: ?0.24, 95%CI: ?1.80–1.32; LP MD:0.80, 95%CI: ?0.95–2.55).ConclusionsDA is not inferior to D + F in elderly patients with LSS and LGDS. DA carries a lower risk of hospital complications and fewer adverse events, however, surgeons should weigh these findings with the increased risk of DS progressing post-operatively.     

Discordance in lumbar bone mineral density measurements by quantitative computed tomography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in postmenopausal women: a prospective comparative study

Background ContextLevel-specific lumbar bone mineral density (BMD) evaluation of a single vertebral body can provide useful surgical planning and osteoporosis management information. Previous comparative studies have primarily focused on detecting spinal osteoporosis but not at specific levels.PurposeTo compare the detection rate of lumbar osteoporosis between quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA); to explore and analyze the distribution models of QCT-derived BMD and DXA T-score at the specific levels; and to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of level-specific BMD thresholds for the prediction of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) in postmenopausal women.Study Design/SettingA comparative analysis of prospectively collected data comparing QCT-derived BMD with DXA T-score.Patient SampleA total of 296 postmenopausal women who were referred to the spine service of a single academic institution were enrolled.Outcome MeasuresQCT-derived BMD and DXA T-score at specific levels, with or without osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.MethodsPostmenopausal women who underwent QCT and DXA within a week of admission from May 2019 to June 2022 were enrolled. The diagnostic criteria for osteoporosis recommended by the World Health Organization and the American College of Radiology were used for lumbar osteoporotic diagnosis. To evaluate differences in lumbar BMD measurements at specific levels, a threshold of T score=-2.5 and QCT-derived BMD = 80 mg/cm³ were used to categorize level-specific lumbar BMD into low and high BMD. Disagreements in BMD categorization between DXA and QCT were classified as a minor or major discordance based on the definition by Woodson. Data between QCT and DXA were visualized in a stacked bar plot and analyzed. Correlations between DXA and QCT at the specific levels were evaluated using Pearson's linear correlation and scatter plots. Curve fitting of BMD distribution, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and area under the curve (AUC) for each single vertebral level was performed.ResultsOf the 296 patients, QCT diagnosed 61.1% as osteoporosis, 30.4% as osteopenia and 8.4% as normal. For those screened with DXA, 54.1% of the patients had osteoporosis, 29.4% had osteopenia and 16.6% had normal BMD. Diagnoses were concordant for 194 (65.5%) patients. Of the other 102 discordant patients, 5 (1.7%) were major and 97 (32.8%) were minor. Significant correlations in level-specific BMD between DXA and QCT were observed (p<.001), with Pearson's correlation coefficients ranging from 0.662 to 0.728. The correlation strength was in the order of L1 > L2 > L3 > L4. The low BMD detection rate for QCT was significantly higher than that for DXA at the L3 and L4 levels (65% vs. 47.9% and 68.1% vs 43.7, respectively, p<.001). Patients with OVCF showed significantly lower QCT-derived BMD (47.2 mg/cm³ vs. 83.2 mg/cm³, p<.001) and T-score (-3.39 vs. -1.98, p<.001) than those without OVCF. Among these patients, 82.8% (101/122) were diagnosed with osteoporosis by QCT measurement, while only 74.6% (91/122) were diagnosed by DXA. For discrimination between patients with and without OVCF, QCT-derived BMD showed better diagnosed performance (AUC range from 0.769 to 0.801) than DXA T-score (AUC range from 0.696 to 0.753).ConclusionQCT provided a more accurate evaluation of lumbar osteoporosis than DXA. The QCT-derived BMD measurements at a specific lumbar level have a high diagnostic performance for OVCF.     

Holmes tremor in a monocentric series of resected brainstem cavernomas

ObjectSeveral scientific papers report clinical symptoms, indications, complications and outcomes of brainstem cavernous malformation (BSCM) surgery without reporting on the occurrence of postoperative Holmes tremor (HT). Our purpose is to report our experience with HT in a monocentric series of resected brainstem cavernomas.MethodsWe reviewed all the BSCM surgical records between 2002 and 2018 at Saint-Luc University Hospital's Department of Neurosurgery, Brussels and selected patients developing HT postoperatively. Patients’ demographics, symptoms, pre- and postoperative imaging, recurrence and complications were analysed. A PubMed literature review was performed to compare our results with those in the existing literature.ResultsIn a total series of 18 resected BSCM, 5 patients: 1 male and 4 females, with a median age of 51 years (range 29–59 years), developed HT. The median preoperative mRS score was 2 (range 1–4). GTR was achieved in all patients without surgery-related death. BSCM were located in the mesencephalon in 4 patients (80%) who developed HT. Tremor was noticed between ten days and one year after surgery. One patient saw significant improvements to the point of stopping treatment. The median follow-up period was 2 years (range 1–14 years). At the last follow-up, 40% of our patients showed a worse mRS score, 40% stayed unchanged, and 20% improved.ConclusionWe are reporting an original single-center series of patients suffering from HT after BSCM surgery. The risk for HT after surgery is significant for midbrain BSCM. A spontaneous favorable evolution is possible.     

Patient-related risk factors and lifestyle factors for lumbar degenerative disc disease: a systematic review

ObjectiveBack pain is a very widespread disease pattern and is one of the most frequent causes for consultation of a physician in general. In most cases, discogenic changes are the pathomorphological correlate of back pain. Numerous risk factors have been identified for these degenerative changes, but the influence and significance of the risk factors remain unclear, which was the aim of this systematic review.MethodsA systematic literature search of the commonly used Pubmed database was performed using specific MESH terms. Further selection of the included studies was performed according to the PRISMA scheme, taking into account scientific merit as well as the relation to the research question.ResultsA total of 111 studies out of 1035 found were finally included in the literature search. 134 risk factors for disc degeneration and disc herniation were identified. These were divided into (1) patient-specific risk factors (n░=░34), (2) radiological risk factors (n░=░31), (3) lifestyle risk factors (n░=░6), (4) workplace-related risk factors (n░=░12), (5) genetic risk factors (n░=░50), and (6) other risk factors (n░=░1). Non-adjustable risk factors were age >50 years (OR 1.7/year), female gender (OR 1.41), family disposition (OR 4.0), comorbidities like atherosclerosis (OR 2.24), arthritic changes in other joints (OR 3.1) and history of injuries of the back (OR 3.1). Adjustable factors were elevated BMI (OR 2.77), comorbidities like hypertension (OR 1.25), dyslipidemia (OR 1.26) and diabetes mellitus (OR 6.8), as well as lifestyle habits like smoking (OR 3.8).DiscussionIn summary, intervertebral disc degenerations and herniations represent multifactorial events whose risk factors can be partly influenced and partly not influenced. This systematic review highlights the current state of knowledge as a basis for creating patient-specific algorithms to calculate risk for the development or progression of degenerative disc changes and disc herniations.     

Construct validity and responsiveness of commonly used patient reported outcome instruments in decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis

BackgroundValidity and responsiveness of Oswestry disability index (ODI), Roland Morris disability questionnaires (RMDQ), Short Form-12 Physical Component Score (SF-12 PCS) and Short Form-12 Mental Component Score (SF-12 MCS) in patients undergoing open decompression for lumbar canal stenosis has not been previously reported.MethodsOutcome assessment was prospectively evaluated using the ODI, RMDQ, SF-12 PCS and SF-12 MCS pre-intervention and at average follow-up of three months post-intervention. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the association between change in values of ODI, RMDQ, SF-12 PCS and SF-12 MCS. Distribution based methods (Effect size [ES], standardised response mean [SRM]) and anchor based method (Area under the curve [AUC] of receiver operating curve [ROC]) were used to determine responsiveness. AUC value ≥ 0.70 is considered as adequate level of responsiveness and the outcome instrument with the largest AUC is considered to be the most responsive outcome instrument.ResultsThis study included 77 participants. Responsiveness was assessed at a mean follow-up of 12 weeks postoperatively. There was significant strong correlation between ODI and RMDQ (r = 0.65, p < 0.0001). The ES of ODI, RMDQ, SF-12 PCS and SF-12 MCS were 1.54, 1.48, 1.85 and 0.51 respectively. The SRM of RMDQ, ODI, SF-12 PCS and SF-12 MCS were 1.22, 1.17, 1.0 and 0.47 respectively. AUC of ODI, RMDQ, SF-12 PCS and SF-12 MCS were 0.83–0.88, 0.82 to 0.86, 0.78 to 0.81 and 0.69 to 0.70 respectively.ConclusionIt is recommended to use either ODI or RMDQ as region specific patient reported outcome instrument and SF-12 PCS as a health related quality of life outcome instrument to evaluate outcome after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis.     

Derivation and Validation of a Machine Learning Algorithm for Predicting Venous Thromboembolism in Injured Children

BackgroundVenous thromboembolism (VTE) causes significant morbidity in pediatric trauma patients. We applied machine learning algorithms to the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database to develop and validate a risk prediction model for VTE in injured children.MethodsPatients ≤18 years were identified from TQIP (2017–2019, n = 383,814). Those administered VTE prophylaxis ≤24 h and missing the outcome (VTE) were removed (n = 347,576). Feature selection identified 15 predictors: intubation, need for supplemental oxygen, spinal injury, pelvic fractures, multiple long bone fractures, major surgery (neurosurgery, thoracic, orthopedic, vascular), age, transfusion requirement, intracranial pressure monitor or external ventricular drain placement, and low Glasgow Coma Scale score. Data was split into training (n = 251,409) and testing (n = 118,175) subsets. Machine learning algorithms were trained, tested, and compared.ResultsLow-risk prediction: For the testing subset, all models outperformed the baseline rate of VTE (0.15%) with a predicted rate of 0.01–0.02% (p < 2.2e⁻¹⁶). 88.4–89.4% of patients were classified as low risk by the models.High-risk predictionAll models outperformed baseline with a predicted rate of VTE ranging from 1.13 to 1.32% (p < 2.2e⁻¹⁶). The performance of the 3 models was not significantly different.ConclusionWe developed a predictive model that differentiates injured children for development of VTE with high discrimination and can guide prophylaxis use.Level of EvidencePrognostic, Level II.Type of StudyRetrospective, Cross-sectional.     

Beyond the 10-Year Horizon: Mitral Valve Repair Solely With Chordal Replacement and Annuloplasty

BackgroundThe long-term outcomes of mitral valve repair by nonresection techniques, such as annuloplasty and chordal replacement, for degenerative mitral valve regurgitation were investigated.MethodsAll consecutive patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation who received solely chordal replacement and annuloplasty for mitral valve repair between 2003 and 2010 at the German Heart Center Munich were reviewed. The endpoints of this retrospective study were survival, cumulative incidence of reoperation on the mitral valve, and cumulative incidence of significant recurrent mitral regurgitation.ResultsA total of 346 patients were evaluated. The median follow-up period was 10.86 (range, 0.01-15.86) years. The 30-day mortality rate was 0.58% (n = 2 of 346), whereas the 5-year survival was 92.97% ± 1.41%. At 5 years, cumulative incidence of recurrent mitral regurgitation was 6.87% ± 1.57% and cumulative incidence of reoperation on the mitral valve was 3.69% ± 1.05%. Survival at 10 years was 83.35% ± 2.15%. At 10 years, cumulative incidence of recurrent mitral regurgitation was 13.31% ± 2.22% and cumulative incidence of reoperation was 7.84% ± 1.55%. Cox regression analysis identified age, diabetes mellitus, and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction <55% as independent risk factors for death. Left ventricular ejection fraction <55% was revealed as independent risk factor for significant recurrent mitral regurgitation.ConclusionsThis study demonstrated excellent long-term outcomes with low incidence of reoperation after mitral valve repair using chordal replacement in a highly selected patient cohort. Our findings emphasized the importance of early intervention in severe degenerative mitral regurgitation, especially in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction.