The effect of different air-polishing powders on dentin bonding

PURPOSE: Air-polishing is routinely used for professional tooth cleaning. Therefore, the aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of different air-polishing powders on dentin bonding. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dentin bond strengths of a resin composite (Clearfil AP-X) bonded with different classes of adhesives (4-step etch-and-rinse: Syntac; 3-step etch-and-rinse: OptiBond FL; 2-step etch-and-rinse: Single Bond Plus; 2-step self-etching: AdheSE, Clearfil SE Bond, Clearfil Protect Bond, One Coat Self-Etch Bond; all-in-one/mix: Xeno III; all-in-one/no mix: Clearfil S3 Bond, G-Bond) were measured on flattened dentin surfaces. In test groups, specimens were air polished with Prophypearls (calcium carbonate) or ClinPro Prophypowder (glycine) prior to bonding. Microtensile bond strengths were evaluated after 24 h of storage at 37 degrees C in water. Surfaces and resin-dentin interfaces were observed by SEM, TEM, and CLSM. RESULTS: Mean bond strengths varied from 18 to 73 MPa in control groups. Calcium carbonate air polishing generally caused significantly reduced dentin bond strengths (p < 0.05). TEM exhibited severe nanoleakage after calcium carbonate air polishing. Glycine did not affect dentin bonding performance of the adhesives under investigation. CONCLUSION: Calcium carbonate air polishing should be avoided when dentin-bonded restorations are applied. Glycine powder is an alternative.     

Microtensile bond strength of current dentin adhesives measured immediately and 24 hours after application

PURPOSE: To evaluate the immediate microtensile bond strengths achieved with representative adhesive systems from each of the four current bonding approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Resin composite was bonded incrementally to flat, midcoronal dentin from 33 human molars, using the adhesives (Adper Scotchbond MP; Adper Scotchbond 1; Optibond Solo Plus; Clearfil SE Bond; AdheSE; Tyrian SPE + One Step Plus; Optibond Solo Plus self-etching; One-Up Bond F; iBond; Adper Prompt L-Pop; Xeno III) according to the respective manufacturer's instructions. The bonded specimens were immediately sectioned into sticks and underwent microtensile bond testing either immediately or after 24 h. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and LSD tests. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between immediate and 24-h bond strengths (p > 0.05). However, significant differences were observed among adhesives (p = 0.001). The all-in-one adhesive iBond showed statistically lower values when compared to all the other adhesives. Adper Prompt L-Pop, Xeno III, Tyrian SPE + One Step Plus and One-Up Bond F, all self-etching adhesives, were significantly weaker than AdheSE, Optibond Solo Plus, Adper Scotchbond 1, Optibond Solo Plus self-etching, Clearfil SE Bond, and Adper Scotchbond MP, which did not differ statistically from each other. CONCLUSION: Microtensile bond strengths of representative adhesive systems from the four categories of bonding agents were not equivalent, with the lowest values recorded for the one-step self-etching adhesives. There were no differences in the bond strengths when measured immediately and after 24 h.     

Two-year bond strengths of "all-in-one" adhesives to dentine

Objectives

To test the long-term in vitro bonding performance of “all-in-one” self-etch adhesives to dentine.

Methods

Adper Prompt (3M ESPE), Bond Force (Tokuyama), Brush &; Bond (Parkell), iBond Self Etch (Heraeus Kulzer), OptiBond All-In-One (Kerr), and Xeno IV (Dentsply Caulk) were tested. The two-step self-etch adhesive Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray) served as the control. Extracted human teeth were assigned to groups after creation of smear layer on occlusal dentine. Adhesives were applied according to manufacturers’ instructions, and resin composite (Filtek Z250, 3M ESPE) build-ups were placed. The bonded specimens were sectioned into beams after 24 h of storage in water. Microtensile bond strengths (μTBS) was determined at baseline, and following one and two years of water storage using an EZ-Test device (Shimadzu). Representative specimens were examined under field emission scanning electron microscope. Fracture mode was recorded. The data were analyzed using linear mixed effects and least square means analyses. The significance level was set at 0.01 for the pairwise comparisons and at 0.05 for the overall model effects.

Results

The mean μTBS decreased significantly over time for Adper Prompt, iBond Self Etch, and OptiBond All-In-One. After two years of water ageing, Bond Force, Brush &; Bond, OptiBond All-In-One, and Xeno IV had mean μTBS values not statistically different from Clearfil SE Bond.

Conclusions

After two years of water ageing, Clearfil SE Bond outperformed two of six all-in-one adhesives. That indicates that the composition of the adhesives rather than their application approach is accountable for their performance.

Clinical significance

Despite the data available suggesting that most all-in-one adhesives are severely affected by hydrolytic degradation, results of the present in vitro study suggest that some may perform as well as the clinically proven Clearfil SE Bond in the longer term.     

Slow progression of dentin bond degradation during one-year water storage under simulated pulpal pressure

Objectives

To evaluate the dentin bond durability of simplified adhesives after one-year (1 y) under water storage and simulated pulpal pressure.

Methods

Class I cavities were prepared in sixty human third molars with the pulpal wall located in mid-coronal dentin. The roots were cut off to expose the pulpal chamber, and the teeth were assembled in a pulpal pressure simulator device. A two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive (Single Bond 2/SB), a two-step self-etch adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond/CSE), a three-step self-etch adhesive (Adper Scotchbond SE/SSE) and three all-in-one adhesives (Adper Easy Bond/EB, Clearfil S³ Bond/S3 and Adhese One/AO) were applied according to manufacturer? instructions. No enamel pre-etching was used for the self-etch systems. The cavities were filled with a composite (Z250, 3M ESPE) in four to five horizontal increments and individually cured. Immediately after the final cure, pulpal pressure was set to 15 cm H₂O. After 24 h and 1 y under simulate pulpal pressure the teeth were cut following a ‘nontrimming’ microtensile test technique (n = 30) and tested in tension. Kruskall–Wallis and post hoc multiple comparisons were used at α = 0.05. Weibull statistics was applied to SB, CSE and EB. Fractographic analysis of debonded specimens was performed using scanning electron microscopy.

Results

At 24 h and 1 y periods, SB showed higher bond strength means than all the others adhesives tested. CSE was not statistically different from EB at 24 h and from EB and SB at 1 y. EB showed bond strength statistically higher than the other three self-etch adhesives, which were not statistically different from each other at 24 h. AO showed significantly lower bond strength than all tested materials after 1 y. For all adhesives the mean bond strength at 1 y were not statistically different from the values measured at 24 h (p > 0.05). Shifts in failure mode patterns and Weibull modulus decrease indicate some degree of bond degradation after the 1 y storage period.

Conclusion

One-year of simulated pulpal pressure did not affect dentin bond strength of simplified adhesives in Class I restorations. Signs of degradation were only revealed by fractographic analysis and reliability parameters.     

A randomized controlled 5-year prospective study of two HEMA-free adhesives,a 1-step self etching and a 3-step etch-and-rinse,in non-carious cervical lesions

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate the 5 year clinical dentin bonding effectiveness of two HEMA-free adhesives in Class V non-carious cervical lesions.

Material and methods

A total of 169 Class V restorations were placed in 67 patients with a self-etching adhesive (G-Bond; 67), a 3-step HEMA and TEGDMA free etch-and-rinse (cfm; 51) and a control HEMA-containing etch-and-rinse adhesive (XP Bond; 51) in non-carious cervical lesions without intentional enamel involvement. The restorations were evaluated at baseline and yearly during a 5 year follow-up with modified USPHS criteria. Dentin bonding efficiency was determined by the percentage of lost restorations.

Results

During the 5 years, 159 restorations could be evaluated. Good short time dentin retention was observed for the three adhesives, there all adhesives fulfilled at 18 months the full acceptance ADA criteria. At 5 years a cumulative number of 22 lost restorations (13.8%) was observed. The HEMA-free adhesives showed significantly higher dentin retention compared to the HEMA-containing one. Loss of retention was observed for 5 G-Bond (7.9%), 4 cfm (8.3%) and 13 XP Bond (27.1%) restorations (p < 0.05). No post-operative sensitivity was reported by the participants. No secondary caries was observed.

Significance

The durability in non-carious cervical lesions of the HEMA-free adhesives was successful after 5 years. Despite concerns which have been raised, showed the 1-step SEA one of the best reported clinical dentin bonding effectiveness.     

Effect of carbodiimide (EDC) on the bond stability of etch-and-rinse adhesive systems

Objective

Recent studies supported the use of protein cross-linking agents during bonding procedures to inactivate endogenous dentin proteases, preventing dentin collagen degradation thus improving bond durability. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC)-containing conditioner on the stability of the adhesive interface created by two etch-and-rinse adhesives.

Methods

Human dentin was etched with 35% phosphoric acid, treated with 0.3 M EDC-containing conditioner followed by a three-step or a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive. Adhesives were applied to control specimens without EDC pre-treatment. Specimens were subjected to microtensile bond strength test and pulled to failure after 24 h or 1 year of storage and interfacial nanoleakage expression was evaluated and quantified by light microscopy. Additionally, to investigate endogenous dentin matrix metalloproteinase activity a zymographic assay was performed on protein extracts obtained from phosphoric-acid-etched dentin powder with or without EDC treatment.

Results

The use of the EDC-containing conditioner did not affect immediate bond strength to dentin but contributed to preserve the bond strength after 1 year (p < 0.05) for both tested adhesives. No difference was found in the interfacial nanoleakage expression that increased after aging irrespective from the treatment. EDC pre-treatment inhibited dentin endogenous MMPs as assayed with the zymography.

Significance

In conclusion, the results of the study provide proof that EDC can produce long-term inactivation of MMPs in acid-etched dentin matrices contributing to bond strength preservation over time. Future studies are needed to support the use of EDC in vivo.     

Correlation between degree of conversion,resin–dentin bond strength and nanoleakage of simplified etch-and-rinse adhesives

Objectives

The aim of this study was to correlate the degree of conversion measured inside the hybrid layer (DC) with the microtensile resin–dentin bond strength (μTBS) and silver nitrate uptake or nanoleakage (SNU) for five simplified etch-and-rinse adhesive systems.

Methods

Fifty-five caries free extracted molars were used in this study. Thirty teeth were used for μTBS/SNU [n = 6] and 25 teeth for DC [n = 5]. The dentin surfaces were bonded with the following adhesives: Adper Single Bond 2 (SB), Ambar (AB), XP Bond (XP), Tetric N-Bond (TE) and Stae (ST) followed by composite resin build-ups. For μTBS and SNU test, bonded teeth were sectioned in order to obtain stick-shaped specimens (0.8 mm²), which were tested under tensile stress (0.5 mm/min). Three bonded sticks, from each tooth, were not tested in tensile stress and they were immersed in 50% silver nitrate, photo-developed and analyzed by scanning electron microscopy. Longitudinal 1-mm thick sections were prepared for the teeth assigned for DC measurement and evaluated by micro-Raman spectroscopy.

Results

ST showed lowest DC, μTBS, and higher SNU (p < 0.05). All other adhesives showed similar DC, μTBS, and SNU (p > 0.05), except for TE which showed an intermediate SNU level. The DC was positively correlated with μTBS and negatively correlated with SNU (p < 0.05). SNU was also negatively correlated with μTBS (p < 0.05).

Significance

The measurement of DC inside the hybrid layer can provide some information about bonding performance of adhesive systems since this property showed a good correlation with resin–dentin bond strength and SNU values.     

Can 1% chlorhexidine diacetate and ethanol stabilize resin-dentin bonds?

Objectives

To examine the effects of the combined use of chlorhexidine and ethanol on the durability of resin-dentin bonds.

Methods

Forty-eight flat dentin surfaces were etched (32% phosphoric acid), rinsed (15 s) and kept wet until bonding procedures. Dentin surfaces were blot-dried with absorbent paper and re-wetted with water (water, control), 1% chlorhexidine diacetate in water (CHD/water), 100% ethanol (ethanol), or 1% chlorhexidine diacetate in ethanol (CHD/ethanol) solutions for 30 s. They were then bonded with All Bond 3 (AB3, Bisco) or Excite (EX, Ivoclar-Vivadent) using a smooth, continuous rubbing application (10 s), followed by 15 s gentle air stream to evaporate solvents. The adhesives were light-cured (20 s) and resin composite build-ups constructed for the microtensile method. Bonded beams were obtained and tested after 24-h, 6-months and 15-months of water storage at 37 °C. Storage water was changed every month. Effects of treatment and testing periods were analyzed (ANOVA, Holm–Sidak, p < 0.05) for each adhesive.

Results

There were no interactions between factors for both etch-and-rinse adhesives. AB3 was significantly affected only by storage (p = 0.003). Excite was significantly affected only by treatments (p = 0.048). AB3 treated either with ethanol or CHD/ethanol resulted in reduced bond strengths after 15 months. The use of CHD/ethanol resulted in higher bond strengths values for Excite.

Conclusions

Combined use of ethanol/1% chlorhexidine diacetate did not stabilize bond strengths after 15 months.     

Primary dentin etching time,bond strength and ultra-structure characterization of dentin surfaces

Objectives

To evaluate the effect of shortening the etching time on roughness, microhardness and bond strength of three adhesive systems to primary tooth dentin.

Methods

Flat dentin surfaces from primary molars were randomly assigned to six experimental groups. Three different adhesive systems were used: an etch-and-rinse adhesive (Single Bond), a two-step self-etching (Clearfil SE Bond), and a one-step self-etching (One-Up Bond F) adhesive. In half of the specimens, the recommended etching time was used, in the other half the etching time was 50% reduced. After applying the adhesive, resin composite build-ups were constructed and stored in a humid environment for 24 h at 37 °C. Specimens were sectioned into 1 mm² beams and tested for microtensile bond strength (MTBS). Debonded surfaces were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Additional surfaces were conditioned for microhardness measurements (KHN) and for atomic force microscopy (AFM) analysis. Intertubular and total surface roughness (Ra) were recorded. Results were analyzed with ANOVA and Student–Newman–Keuls tests (P < 0.05).

Results

Single Bond and Clearfil SE Bond showed higher MTBS than One-Up Bond F. Bond strength and intertubular roughness increased when Single Bond and One-Up Bond F were used with a reduced etching time. For Clearfil SE Bond no differences in MTBS were detected when reducing the etching time. The application of phosphoric acid, Clearfil SE Bond primer and One-Up Bond F decreases dentin microhardness.

Conclusions

Shortening One-Up Bond F application time and reducing the etching time of phosphoric acid to one-half of the manufacturer's recommended etching time when using Single Bond are recommended when bonding to primary dentin.     

Combined effect of smear layer characteristics and hydrostatic pulpal pressure on dentine bond strength of HEMA-free and HEMA-containing adhesives

Objective

This study evaluated the combined effect of smear layer characteristics with hydrostatic pulpal pressure (PP) on bond strength and nanoleakage expression of HEMA-free and -containing self-etch adhesives.

Methods

Flat dentine surfaces were obtained from extracted human molars. Smear layers were created by grinding with #180- or #600-SiC paper. Three HEMA-free adhesives (Xeno V, G Bond Plus, Beautibond Multi) and two HEMA-containing adhesives (Bond Force, Tri-S Bond) were applied to the dentine surfaces under hydrostatic PP or none. Dentine bond strengths were determined using the microtensile bond test (μTBS). Data were statistically analyzed using three- and two-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc comparison test. Nanoleakage evaluation was carried out under a scanning electron microscope (SEM).

Results

Coarse smear layer preparation and hydrostatic PP negatively affected the μTBS of HEMA-free and -containing adhesives, but there were no significant differences. The combined experimental condition significantly reduced μTBS of the HEMA-free adhesives, while the HEMA-containing adhesives exhibited no significant differences. Two-way ANOVA indicated that for HEMA-free adhesives, there were significant interactions in μTBS between smear layer characteristics and pulpal pressure, while for HEMA-containing adhesives, there were no significant interactions between them. Nanoleakage formation within the adhesive layers of both adhesive systems distinctly increased in the combined experimental group.

Conclusion

The combined effect of coarse smear layer preparation with hydrostatic PP significantly reduced the μTBS of HEMA-free adhesives, while in HEMA-containing adhesives, these effects were not obvious.

Clinical significance

Smear layer characteristics and hydrostatic PP would additively compromise dentine bonding of self-etch adhesives, especially HEMA-free adhesives.     

Mechanical properties and modeling of drug release from chlorhexidine-containing etch-and-rinse adhesives

Objectives

To evaluate the effects of chlorhexidine (CHX) addition in different concentrations into simplified etch-and-rinse adhesives on the ultimate tensile strength (UTS), water sorption (WS), solubility (SO) and the rate of CHX release over time.

Methods

We added CHX diacetate to Ambar [AM] (FGM) and XP Bond [XP] (Dentsply) in concentrations of 0, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.2 wt%. For UTS (n = 10 for each group), adhesive specimens were constructed in an hourglass shape metallic matrix with cross-sectional area of 0.8 mm². Half of specimens were tested after 24 h and the other half after 28 days of water storage in tension of 0.5 mm/min. For WS and SO (n = 10 for each group), adhesive discs (5.8 mm × 1.0 mm) were prepared into a mold. After desiccation, we weighed and stored the cured adhesive specimens in distilled water for evaluation of the WS, SO and the cumulative release of CHX over a 28-day period. For CHX release (n = 10 for each group), spectrophotometric measurements of storage solution were performed to examine the release kinetics of CHX. We subjected data from each test to ANOVA and Tukey’ test (α = 0.05).

Results

XP Bond adhesive showed significantly more WS and SO and lower UTS than Ambar. In general, the addition of CHX did not alter WS, SO and UTS of the adhesives. XP showed a higher CHX release than AM (p < 0.05) in all concentrations and the final amount of CHX release was directly proportional to the initial CHX concentration added to the adhesives. After 28 days of water storage, approximately 20% of CHX was released from XP and 8.0–12.0% from AM.

Conclusions

Addition of CHX to commercial adhesive is a feasible method to provide a controlled release of CHX over time without jeopardizing WS, SO and UTS of the adhesives.

Significance

Manufacturers should consider adding CHX to commercial adhesives to provide a controlled release of CHX over time.     

Active application improves the bonding performance of self-etch adhesives to dentin

Objectives

To evaluate the effect of application method on immediate and 6-month resin–dentin microtensile bond strength (μTBS) and nanoleakage (NL) of three one-step self-etch adhesives systems (Clearfil S³ Bond (S3), Xeno III (XE) and Adper Prompt L-Pop (AD)).

Methods

The oclusal enamel of 30 human molar was removed in order to expose a flat dentin surface. The adhesives were applied under two modes: inactive (IN) or active (AC) application. After light-curing (600 mW/cm² for 10 s), composite buildups were constructed incrementally and sectioned to obtain bonded sticks (0.8 mm²) to be tested in tension immediately (IM) or after 6 months (6M) of water storage. For NL, three bonded sticks from each tooth at each time were coated with nail varnish, placed in silver nitrate and polished down with SiC paper. The μTBS data were submitted to a two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test for each adhesive (α = 0.05).

Results

The AC showed higher μTBS to dentin when compared to IN in both periods of time (p = 0.001). Only for AD, lower μTBS was seen after 6M for IN and AC techniques. XE and S3 adhesives applied under IN showed a higher amount of silver penetration throughout the hybrid layer. Low silver nitrate deposition was seen for these adhesives under AC. After 6M, AD showed a higher amount of silver nitrate uptake under IN and AC techniques.

Conclusions

AC improves the bonding performance of all one-step self-etch adhesive systems tested regardless of the time and this tendency was maintained over time.     

Bonding potential of self-adhesive luting agents used at different temperatures to lute composite onlays

Objectives

To assess whether the bonding potential to dentin of self-adhesive resin cements was affected by their pre-cure temperature.

Methods

Composite overlays (Paradigm MZ100, 3M ESPE) were luted on 100 extracted molars with G-Cem (GC Corp.), BisCem (Bisco), Multilink Sprint (Ivoclar Vivadent), SAC-A (Kuraray Co.), XP Bond/Calibra (Detrey Dentsply). The cements were used at pre-cure temperatures that recur in their handling (4 °C refrigerator, 24 °C room and 37 °C intraoral), as well as following pre-heating up to 60 °C. Microtensile bond strengths to dentin were measured and compared with statistical tests. Scanning electron microscope observations of cement–dentin interfaces were performed.

Results

The bond strength of G-Cem and Calibra was not significantly affected by temperature changes from refrigerator storage to intraoral application. At any assessed pre-cure temperature the total-etch luting agent Calibra achieved a significantly stronger adhesion than the auto-adhesive cements. Limited to null adhesion was yielded by BisCem and SAC-A. The procedure of 60 °C pre-heating, proposed in previous studies for restorative resin composites, was of no use for the tested luting agents. Only the total-etch luting agent Calibra developed a distinct hybrid layer. The self-adhesive cements exhibited a more superficial interaction with dentin.

Conclusions

Regardless of the pre-cure temperature, the bonding potential of the self-adhesive resin cements was inferior to that of the total-etch luting agent tested as control. The adhesive properties of the BisCem and SAC-A were extremely scarce.     

Adhesive performance of a multi-mode adhesive system: 1-Year in vitro study

Objectives

The aim of this study was to investigate the adhesive stability over time of a multi-mode one-step adhesive applied using different bonding techniques on human coronal dentine. The hypotheses tested were that microtensile bond strength (μTBS), interfacial nanoleakage expression and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) activation are not affected by the adhesive application mode (following the use of self-etch technique or with the etch-and-rinse technique on dry or wet dentine) or by ageing for 24 h, 6 months and 1 year in artificial saliva.

Methods

Human molars were cut to expose middle/deep dentine and assigned to one of the following bonding systems (N = 15): (1) Scotchbond Universal (3M ESPE) self-etch mode, (2) Scotchbond Universal etch-and-rinse technique on wet dentine, (3) Scotchbond Universal etch-and-rinse technique on dry dentine, and (4) Prime&Bond NT (Dentsply De Trey) etch-and-rinse technique on wet dentine (control). Specimens were processed for μTBS test in accordance with the non-trimming technique and stressed to failure after 24 h, 6 months or 1 year. Additional specimens were processed and examined to assay interfacial nanoleakage and MMP expression.

Results

At baseline, no differences between groups were found. After 1 year of storage, Scotchbond Universal applied in the self-etch mode and Prime&Bond NT showed higher μTBS compared to the other groups. The lowest nanoleakage expression was found for Scotchbond Universal applied in the self-etch mode, both at baseline and after storage. MMPs activation was found after application of each tested adhesive.

Conclusions

The results of this study support the use of the self-etch approach for bonding the tested multi-mode adhesive system to dentine due to improved stability over time.

Clinical significance

Improved bonding effectiveness of the tested universal adhesive system on dentine may be obtained if the adhesive is applied with the self-etch approach.     

Inhibition of cell survival, viability and proliferation by dentin adhesives after direct and indirect exposure in vitro

Objectives

The influence of dentin adhesive systems (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, XP Bond, Xeno V, Clearfil Protect Bond, AdheSE) on cell survival, viability and proliferation was characterized after direct and indirect exposure using different cell culture techniques.

Materials and methods

The primers and cured bonding parts were directly exposed to cells using cell culture inserts, and complete materials were analyzed in a dentin barrier test. Cell responses were examined in 3T3 mouse fibroblasts after 24- and 72-h exposure periods by the estimation of total cell numbers (survival), apoptosis (viability) and cell proliferation.

Results

Cell numbers were effectively reduced by the primers of AdheSE, Protect Bond, and Scotchbond Multi-Purpose as well as XP bond after direct exposure in a cell culture insert test device. Likewise, Scotchbond Multi-Purpose primer induced a rate of apoptosis (93.9%) even higher than detected with Protect Bond primer (91.6%). Cell proliferation was entirely inhibited by primers and by Xp Bond as well. The Scotchbond Multi-Purpose was most cytotoxic in a dentin barrier test device after a 24-h indirect exposure. It also increased the percentage of cells in apoptosis to 15.4% compared to untreated controls.

Conclusion

Unpolymerized primers of dentin adhesives were more cytotoxic than polymerized bonding counterparts. Moreover, total etch dentin adhesives were more cytotoxic than self-etch adhesives.

Clinical relevance

When dentin adhesives are used in deep cavities without a protective dentin barrier the leachable hydrophobic and hydrophilic component of dentin adhesive systems can penetrate to the pulp and may induce cytotoxic responses in pulp tissues.     

Rationale behind the design and comparative evaluation of an all-in-one self-etch model adhesive

Objective

To investigate and compare bonding and dentin sealing efficacy of a marketed all-in-one and an experimental model adhesive with minimum effective amounts of acidic monomer and water.

Materials and methods

Composition of model adhesive (NAD) in mass%: UDMA (45), 4-META (20), H₂O (7.5), and acetone (27.5). For characterization of a reasonable NAD application procedure shear bond strengths (SBS, n = 8) were determined on human enamel and dentin. Clearfil S³ Bond (TSB; Kuraray) served as reference. SBSs were evaluated after 10 min, 1 and 7 days, and 1 month, marginal adaptation (n = 8) was assessed in cylindrical butt-joint dentin cavities. Diffusive and convective water fluxes through 1 mm thick adhesive-coated dentin disks (n = 6) were qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed.

Results

SBSs proved that application of NAD in one coat with 20 s agitated dwell time was ≥20 MPa, enamel SBSs (24 h) were 25 MPa, p > 0.05. Dentin SBSs for TSB and NAD were not different (p > 0.05) at the four stages (means: 18.9, 23.5, 25.4, and 23.6 MPa). Five and seven of the eight bonded restorations with TSB and NAD were gap-free (p > 0.05). Dentin disks treated with EDTA from both sides or one side only were highly permeable for liquid, whereas adhesive-coated dentin disks showed no permeability at 0 and 2.5 kPa water pressure.

Conclusions

Within the limitations of this study the model adhesive tested represents a promising basic composition for all-in-one adhesives, eliminating common problems encountered with single step adhesives such as phase separation and permeability.     

Effect of bur-cut dentin on bond strength using two all-in-one and one two-step adhesive systems

PURPOSE: To compare the microtensile bond strength (MTBS) of two all-in-one adhesive systems and one experimental two-step self-etching adhesive system to two types of bur-cut dentin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using one of the three adhesives, Xeno CF Bond (Xeno), Prompt L-Pop (PL), or the experimental two-step system ABF (ABF), resin composite was bonded to flat buccal and root dentin surfaces of eight extracted human premolars. These surfaces were produced using either regular-grit or superfine-grit diamond burs. After storage overnight in 37 degrees C water, the bonded specimens were sectioned into six or seven slices approximately 0.7 mm thick perpendicular to the bonded surface. They were then subjected to microtensile testing. The surfaces of the fractured specimens were observed microscopically to determine the failure mode. In addition, to observe the effect of conditioning, the two types of bur-cut dentin surfaces were conditioned with the adhesives, rinsed with acetone, and observed with SEM. RESULTS: When Xeno and PL were bonded to dentin cut with a regular-grit diamond bur, MTBS values were lower than to superfine bur-cut dentin, and failures occurred adhesively at the interface, whereas the experimental two-step adhesive showed no significant difference in microtensile bond strength between two differently cut surfaces. CONCLUSION: The all-in-one adhesives tested here improved bond strengths when bonded to superfine bur-cut dentin as a substrate, whereas the experimental two-step adhesive system showed unchanged bonding to both regular and superfine bur-cut dentin surfaces.     

Differential bonds degradation of two resin-modified glass-ionomer cements in primary and permanent teeth

Objectives

To evaluate the effect of chemical degradation on bond strength of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements bonded to primary and permanent dentin.

Methods

Class I cavities of permanent and primary extracted human molars were restored with two resin-modified glass-ionomer cements: Fuji II LC and Vitremer, and stored in water for 24 h. Half samples were immersed in 10% NaOCl aqueous solution for 5 h. Teeth were sectioned into beams and tested for microtensile bond strengths. Results were analyzed with multiple ANOVA and Tukey's tests (p < 0.05). Analysis of debonded surfaces was performed by SEM.

Results

24 h bond strengths for Vitremer and Fuji II LC were similar. For Fuji II, bond strength values were higher for primary than for permanent dentin. Vitremer bond strength was similar for both. Chemical degradation did not affect Fuji II LC bond strength to dentin. However, decreases in bond strength were found for Vitremer groups after NaOCl immersion. Signs of glass ionomer–dentin interaction were evident by SEM analysis for Fuji II LC specimens.

Conclusions

Vitremer and Fuji II presented similar bond strength at 24. Vitremer dentin bonds were prone to chemical degradation. Fuji II LC–dentin bonds showed typical features of glass-ionomer dentin interaction at the bonded interfaces, and were resistant to in vitro degradation.     

Shear bond strength of seventh generation bonding agents on dentin of primary teeth--an in vitro study

This controlled, randomized, in vitro study evaluated the shear bond strength of several seventh generation bonding agents on the dentin of primary teeth. Six different adhesives were used: Xeno IV, Clearfil S3 Bond, Adper Prompt-L-Pop, AdheSE One, Bond Force, and Optibond (control). Ninety primary teeth were prepared by wet grinding with a 320-grit silicon carbide paper on a polishing wheel running at 110 RPM. After 24 hours of storage in water, shear bond strengths of each group were determined. The mean shear bond strength of the tested adhesive systems to primary dentin was 12.27 MPa. One-way ANOVA testing showed a statistically significant difference between adhesive products (P < 0.001). Tukey HSD post hoc tests were used to assess which means were significantly different from one another. There was no statistically significant difference between the fifth generation adhesive system (Optibond) and the two seventh generation systems (Xeno IV and Bond Force), with Optibond exhibiting a lower mean shear bond strength compared to Bond Force. Within the limitations of this study, there is a significant difference between seventh generation bonding materials. Bond Force and Optibond appear to exhibit higher shear bond strengths than the other products.     

A new use for self-etching resin adhesives: Cementing bone fragments

Objectives

To evaluate the bond capacities of four self-etching resin cements and the self-etching adhesives of the same manufacturer when used to cement bone fragments and compare them with a well-known N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate bone adhesive.

Methods

125 cylindrical bone specimens from pig mandibular ramus bone were prepared using terphane burs and cemented to the corticals of 125 other specimens obtained from pig mandibular body bone using the following bond systems: Group A: Adper PLP/Relyx; group B: Optibond/Maxcem; group C: Hystoacryl; group D: AdheSE/Multilink; group E: G-Bond/G-Cem. Shear bond strength was measured 15 min after cement application using a universal testing machine.

Results

Shear bond strength results: group A 2.54 ± 0.23 MPa; group B 4.83 ± 0.4 MPa; group C 2.90 ± 0.24 MPa; group D 2.10 ± 0.17 MPa; group E 4.22 ± 0.24 MPa. Values for shear bond strength were significantly greater for group B and E compared to groups A, C and D (p < 0.005, test Mann–Whitney). SEM images showed the presence of a hybrid layer similar to that formed by these bond systems when used on dentine.

Conclusion

Within the limitations of an in vitro investigation, results show that self-etching resin cements together with self-etching adhesives may be used for cementing bone fragments.