房室折返性心动过速合并房室结双径路的射频消融治疗

目的:探讨房室折返性心动过速(AVRT)合并房室结双径路(AVNDP)的电生理特征和射频消融术式的选择。方法:对640例阵发性室上性心动过速(PSVT)进行电生理检查,观察PSVT发作时传导的顺序,然后进行消融治疗。结果:640例PSVT中检出AVRT AVNDP 68例,检出率为10.6%;有8例诱发房室结折返性心动过速,对此类患者进行慢径消融治疗。随访所有经治患者均无复发。结论:AVRT合并AVNDP者阻断房室旁道是消融成功的关键;房室旁道作为"旁观者"时也应作房室旁道消融;如仅有(AH)跳跃但无心动过速者无需接受房室结改良。     

Dual AV Nodal Pathway Physiology After Injury with Radiofrequency Energy in a Patient Without a History of Reentrant Tachycardia

PATRAWALA, R.A., et al. : Dual AV Nodal Pathway Physiology After Injury with Radiofrequency Energy in a Patient Without a History of Reentrant Tachycardia. Radiofrequency (RF) atrioventricular (AV) nodal modification has been reported to occasionally produce a proarrhythmic effect. Dual AV nodal pathway physiology in patients without reentrant tachychardia has also been reported. This case describes AV nodal modification with RF energy in an anatomically intermediate area resulting in the appearance of discontinuous antegrade conduction curves and reentry in a patient in which these were previously not present. This suggests that AV nodal injury may be a mechanism for acquired AV nodal reentry.     

Alterations of Orthodromic Circus Movement Tachycardia by Dual Atrioventricular Nodal Pathways in a Patient with Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome

In a patient with a left sided accessory pathway (AP) three different types of orthodromic circus movement tachycardia were observed; (1) narrow QRS complex tachycardia with a stable cycle length (CL); (2) wide QRS complex tachycardia with a functional bundle branch block ipsilateral to the AP, which, paradoxically, had a shorter CL. The decrease in CL was due to a decrease of the AH interval; and (3) narrow QRS complex tachycardia with alternating CL, due to alternations of the AH interval. These phenomena were attributed to a concomitant dual airioventricular (AV) node, which was eventually proven after successful catheter ablation of the AP.     

Upper and Lower Common Pathways in Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia:

The concepts of upper and lower common pathways represent long-standing controversies of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Over the last years there has been considerable evidence against the presence of a lower and, especially, an upper common pathway as distinct entities that can be identified in most patients with atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia. The mechanism and relevance of these concepts remain speculative.     

Transvenous Ablation with High Frequency Energy for Atrioventricular Junctional (AV Nodal) Reentrant Tachycardia

We performed transcatheter AV junction ablation with high frequency energy in four patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia where extensive trials of several antiarrhythmic drugs failed to prevent further recurrences of tachycardia. Initially high frequency catheter ablation induced complete AV block in all patients. A recuperation of AV 1:1 conduction followed some time later, persisting in follow-up. No complications have been encountered in either the acute phase or the follow-up (from 6 to 8 months; mean +/- SD: 8.7 +/- 2.5 months). The electrophysiological study was carried out 6 weeks following ablation, and all patients showed AV 1:1 conduction. No dual nodal pathway was encountered and no tachycardia could be triggered. With refinement of the method, the potential application of high frequency energy to interrupt intranodal or perinodal connections responsible for reentrant supraventricular tachycardia or to retard AV nodal conduction appears promising.     

Neurohumoral and Hemodynamic Mechanisms of Diuresis During Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Thirty-two consecutive patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias, with previously defined mechanisms of the tachycardias, were interviewed by noninvestigators about whether they experienced symptoms of diuresis during or at the termination of the tachycardias, to test the hypothesis that patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia would have a feeling of diuresis, polyuria, or both during or at the termination of the tachycardia. Twelve of the 13 patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (92%), two of the 15 patients with AV reentrant tachycardia (13%), and one of the 4 patients with atrial flutter associated with 2:1 AV conduction (25%) felt diuresis during or at the termination of the tachycardias (AV nodal reentrant tachycardia vs other forms of tachycardia; P < 0.001). In 14 of the 32 patients, the right atrial pressure and plasma atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) concentration were measured during both the tachycardias and sinus rhythm. The mean right atrial pressure during AV nodal reentrant tachycardia was significantly elevated compared to that during other forms of tachycardia (P < 0.01). The plasma ANP concentration during AV nodal reentrant tachycardia was also elevated significantly compared to that during other forms of tachycardias (P < O.OO1). There were no significant differences in the cycle lengths of the tachycardias, age, left atrial dimensions, or the left ventricular ejection fraction between the AV nodal reentrant tachycardia and the other forms of tachycardia. We concluded that the feeling of diuresis during or at the termination of tachycardia was a more common symptom in patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. The higher secretion of plasma ANP from the right atrium might be involved in the mechanism of this symptom.     

Double Response of the Ventricle During Transient Entrainment in a Common Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

We report a patient with slow-fast atrioventricuiar (AV)nodal reentrant tachycardia, in which double ventricuJar response was demonstrated during rapid pacing at cycle length of 300 msec or less from the high right atrium. The determinants of double ventricular response during transient entrainment in the present case were: (1)a crucial conduction delay in the slow pathway; (2)the collision between the activation via the antegrade fast pathway (antidromically)of the last paced beat and the activation via the antegrade slow pathway (orthodromically)of the previous paced beat, instead of the unidirectional block in the slow pathway; and (3)the enhanced AV nodal conduction over the antegrade fast pathway.     

Effects of Propafenone on Induction and Maintenance of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Electrophysiologic studies were performed in 10 patients with atrioventricular (A-V) nodal reentrant paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias (PSVT), before and after intravenous administration of propafenone (1.5 mg/kg). All patients utilized an A-V nodal slow pathway for anterograde conduction and an A-V nodal fast pathway for retrograde conduction of the reentrant impulse. Propafenone depressed retrograde fast pathway conduction which was manifested by: 1) complete V-A block at all ventricular paced cycle lengths after propafenone in 3 cases; 2) increase in mean +/- SD of ventricular paced cycle length producing V-A block from less than 308 +/- 37 ms to 432 +/- 63 ms in the remaining 7 patients. Nine of the 10 patients had induction of sustained PSVT before propafenone. In 7 of the 9, PSVT could not be induced or sustained after propafenone, reflecting depression of the retrograde fast pathway conduction with either absence of atrial echoes (5 patients) or induction of nonsustained PSVT, with termination occurring after the QRS (2 patients). In 1 patient, single atrial echoes were induced before propafenone but none were noted after the drug. In only 2 patients was a sustained PSVT inducible after propafenone. In conclusion, propafenone inhibited induction of sustained A-V nodal reentrant PSVT in most patients, reflecting depression of retrograde A-V nodal fast pathway conduction.     

Specificity of Retrograde Conduction in Screening for Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Baseline AV conduction properties (antegrade and retrograde) are often used to assess the presence of dual AV nodal physiology or concealed AV accessory pathways. Although retrograde conduction (RET) is assumed to be a prerequisite for AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), its prevalence during baseline measurements has not been evaluated. We reviewed all cases of AVNRT referred for radiofrequency ablation to determine the prevalence of RET at baseline evaluation and after isoproterenol infusion. Results: Seventy-three patients with AVNRT underwent full electrophysiological evaluation. Sixty-six patients had manifest RET and inducible AVNRT during baseline atrial and ventricular stimulation. Seven patients initially demonstrated complete RET block despite antegrade evidence of dual AV nodal physiology. In 3 of these 7 patients AVNRT was inducible at baseline despite the absence of RET. In the other four patients isoproterenol infusion was required for induction of AVNRT, however only 3 of these 4 patients developed RET. One of these remaining patients had persistent VA block after isoproterenol. Conclusions: The induction of AVNRT in the absence of RET suggests that this is not an obligatory feature of this arrhythmia. Therefore, baseline AV conduction properties are unreliable in assessing the presence of AVNRT and isoproterenol infusions should be used routinely to expose RET and reentrant tachycardia.     

Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia in Children

Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation has been widely used in the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. In atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), the experience has been predominantly in adults. The cardiac electrophysiological records of 18 consecutive children undergoing RF catheter AV node modification for AVNRT were reviewed. The patients (10 females, 8 males) were 8.2–17.9 years of age (mean 13.6 ± 3.0), weight 15.2–88.1 kg (mean 52.2 ± 20.8), and height 103–190 cm (mean 157.1 ± 21.7). Thirteen were on antiarrhythmic medications (1–3, average 1.5 drugs/day). All drugs were discontinued 48 hours prior to the ablations. The procedures were performed under sedation and local anesthesia. Pre- and post-AV node modification electrophysiological studies were performed in all procedures. The 18 patients underwent a total of 25 procedures (1.39 ± 0.61 per patient): the anterior approach aimed at the antegrade fast pathway in the first four patients and the posterior approach aimed at the slow pathway in the remainder. Thenumber of energy applications was 8–54 (19.8 ± 10.7) per procedure. The maximum energy used in each procedure was 30–50 watts (33.8 ± 8.4). The average energy was 24–50 watts (33.0 ± 6.8). The fluoroscopy time was 7.1–73.4 minutes (29.9 ± 20.0) per procedure, for a total catheterization time of 228–480 minutes (300.3 ± 59.1). Preablation spontaneous or induced AVNRT (cycle length 310.4 ± 55.0 msec) was seen in all except one who had the arrhythmia (cycle length 270 msec) on surface ECG. In 22 of 25 studies, the AH interval measured 67.4 ± 13.2 msec pre- and 98.7 ± 58.4 msec post-AV node modification (P < 0.02). Procedures were initially successful in 16 (89%) of 18 patients. One patient developed complete AV block requiring DDD pacemaker and has since recovered normal AV conduction. Transient third- or second-degree block was seen in four. Other complications included airway obstruction in one and excessive emesis in another. In follow-up of 2–26 months (13.0 ± 7.3), one patient underwent surgical ablation for failed initial RF catheter ablation, and two underwent successful RF procedures for recurrences. RF catheter AV node modification for AVNRT in children is a useful technique. Under ideal circumstances, it is safe and efficacious. Follow-up to determine the potential long-term complications is necessary.     

Mechanisms of Spontaneous Tachycardia Termination in a Patient with the Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome and Dual Atrioventricular Nodal Pathways

A patient with the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome and recurrent bouts of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia underwent electrophysiologic studies. These studies revealed evidence of dual atrioventricular nodal pathways and a septal accessory pathway. The tachycardia circuit involved anterograde conduction over a slow atrioventricular nodal pathway and retrograde conduction over the accessory pathway. Spontaneous tachycardia termination was frequently observed, was almost always abrupt, and was associated with a beat-to-beat decrease in the A-H interval, In this patient, the mechanism for spontaneous tachycardia termination appeared to be an abrupt shift in anterograde conduction from the slow to the fast pathway, advancing the tachycardia so that the block occurred in the accessory pathway (or atrium). To our knowledge, this mechanism of spontaneous tachycardia termination has not been described previously. Use of agents to facilitate fast atrioventricular nodal conduction (i.e., atro-pine) may be effective in tachycardia termination for these patients.     

Mechanisms of AV Node Reentrant Tachycardia in Young Patients With and Without Dual AV Node Physiology

Recent advances in electrophysiological mapping and radiofrequency catheter ablation have demonstrated the participation of perinodal atrial tissue or pathways in atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Current concepts of the role of these pathways in the genesis of the various forms of AVNRT continue to evolve. In view of these recent advances, this study investigated the electrophysiology of AVNRT in young patients, and factors potentially associated with variant forms of this arrhythmia. Detailed programmed stimulation and catheter mapping were performed in 35 consecutive young patients with AVNRT. This group consisted of 15 male and 20 female patients, with a mean age of 12.1 ± 4.2 years (range 3–18 years). Of the 35 patients, 23 demonstrated dual AV node physiology, either in response to a critically timed extrastimulus (n = 17) or to rapid pacing (n = 6). The common form (antegrade slow-retrograde fast) of AVNHT was demonstrated in 21 of these 23 patients. Antegrade fast-retrograde slow (n = 1) and antegrade slow-retrograde slow (n = 1) forms of AVNRT were identified in the 2 other patients. In contrast, only 5 of the 12 patients who did not demonstrate dual AV node physiology had the common form of AVNRT (P = 0.03). Eive of these patients also had the slow-slow form of AVNRT, while 1 patient each had a fast-slow and fast-fast form of AVNRT. Patients with dual AV node physiology were older (14.2 ± 2.0 years) and more likely to be female (16 of 23) than patients in whom dual A V node physiology was not identified, where the mean age was 10.6 ± 4.2 years and only 4 of 12 patients were female (P = 0.02 for age and P = 0.07 for gender). These observations suggest that the physiology of AV node reentry may evolve as a function of age, with slow-fast AVNRT prevalent in adolescents. However, absence of dual AV node physiology should not preclude diagnosis of AVNRT in young patients with supraventricular tachycardia, in whom atypical forms of AVNRT may be common.     

房室结双径路伴房室结折返性心动过速的室房传导探讨

根据电生理检查结果,将接受射频消融术患者62例分为房室旁道伴房室折返性心动过速(AVRT)32例,房室结双径路(DAVNP)伴房室结折返性心动过速(AVNRT)30例。以房室旁道伴AVRT室房(VA)传导特征为对照,探讨DAVNP伴AVNRT VA传导特征。结果表明DAVNP伴AVNRT其VA传导发生率为100％;室房逆传多经房室结快径;快径逆传具有房室旁道逆传特征。     

Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia in Identical Twins with the Same Left Lateral Accessory Pathways and Innocent Dual Atrioventricular Pathways

LU, C.-W., et al. : Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia in Identical Twins with the Same Left Lateral Accessory Pathways and Innocent Dual Atrioventricular Pathways. We report on 16-year-old, female identical twins who both have atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia caused by the same left lateral atrioventricular accessory pathway. The Kent pathway in twin A was a unidirectional retrograde accessory pathway. A manifest Kent pathway was demonstrated in twin B. Both pathways were successfully ablated by radiofrequency (RF) energy and without recurrence. In addition, innocent dual AV nodal pathways were shown in both patients. These findings suggest that genetic factors may play a role in the pathogenesis of the formation of accessory atrioventricular pathways and dual AV nodal pathways.     

Ablation of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia in a Patient with Reversal of Slow and Fast Pathways Inputs into the Atrioventricular Node

We report a case of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) coexistent with His bundle anomaly and atrial septal defects. The His‐bundle potential was recorded at the coronary sinus (CS) ostium. Fractionated atrial potentials and an A:V electrogram ratio 1:3 were recorded at the anterior septum of the tricuspid annulus approximately 2 cm from CS ostium. Radiofrequency catheter ablation at the anterior septum of the tricuspid annulus effectively eliminated AVNRT. (PACE 2012; 35:e17–e19)     

Atrial Tachycardia as a Proarrhythmic Effect of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Radiofrequency catheter ablation is now the first line treatment for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. The success rate is high with a low incidence of complications. However, a possible proarrhythmic effect of radiofrequency energy has been rarely reported and no study has demonstrated a direct correlation between the anatomic site of the radiofrequency application and the origin of a new post‐ablation arrhythmia. We present a case of a focal atrial tachycardia that occurred after slow pathway radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial nodal reentrant tachycardia and originating close to the previous ablation site. This tachycardia was successfully treated with a second ablation session. (PACE 2011; 34:e33–e37)     

Coincident Idiopathic Left Ventricular Tachycardia and Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia: Control by Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of the Slow Atrioventricular Nodal Pathway

A healthy 37-year-old male presented with a history of frequent palpitations and sustained wide QRS complex tachycardia with a right bundle branch block and left axis morphology. Serial electrophysiological studies revealed two inducible tachycardias, which were shown to represent atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia and idiopathic left ventricular tachycardia. Transformation from one tachycardia to the other occurred spontaneously as well as following atrial or ventricular pacing. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of the slow atrioventricular nodal pathway resulted in cure of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia and the prevention of spontaneous recurrence of ventricular tachycardia, suggesting a role of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in triggering the clinical episodes of ventricular tachycardia. The patient has remained asymptomatic without antiarrhythmic therapy for 8 months.     

Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Atrioventricular Junctional ("AV Nodal") Reentrant Tachycardia in Patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators

Catheter ablation of tachycardias has been undertaken successfully in patients with ICDs without damage to the ICD or lead. Ablation of the slow AV nodal pathway, however, is technically challenging because the lead of the ICD lies close to the ablation site. We report successful ablation of AV Junctional reentrant tachycardia (AVJRT) in three patients with ICDs, In all cases, the ablation site was within a few millimeters of the ICD lead. The ablation was successful in all cases and did not cause damage to the ICD or lead. The patients have remained free of recurrence of AVJRT during a mean follow-up of 12 months.