两种长度的颈椎椎弓根螺钉与侧块螺钉拔出试验比较

目的:比较两种长度的颈椎椎弓根螺钉和侧块螺钉的抗拔出力,探讨颈椎经椎弓根短螺钉固定的可行性。方法:5具C3~C5共15节新鲜颈椎标本,用长度为28mm和20mm的皮质骨螺钉分别置入椎弓根,并用20mm的螺钉行侧块双皮质固定,螺钉进入侧块深度约14mm。行拔出试验,比较螺钉的最大轴向拔出力。结果:椎弓根长螺钉的最大拔出力为650N,椎弓根短螺钉为585N,两者比较无显著性差异(P>0.01);侧块螺钉的最大拔出力为360N,与椎弓根短螺钉比较有显著性差异(P<0.0001)。结论:颈椎椎弓根短螺钉固定可提供足够的稳定性,其安全性相对较高。     

通用型脊柱内固定系统椎弓根螺钉翻修作用的生物力学研究

目的测试自行设计的通用型脊柱内固定系统(generalspinesystem,GSS)椎弓根螺钉以及SOCON、TSRH和Diapason螺钉置入椎体的拔出力及旋入力矩,评价GSS螺钉的翻修作用。方法将36个正常成人腰椎椎体标本随机分为三组,每组12个椎体(24侧椎弓根)。各组标本每个椎体的每侧椎弓根均先拧入CCD螺钉(直径6.0mm,长45mm),行螺钉拔出试验,测试并记录螺钉的最大旋入力矩和最大轴向拔出力。然后各组标本每个椎体均随机选择一侧椎弓根经原钉道拧入GSS螺钉(直径6.5mm,长45mm);第一组另一侧拧入SOCON螺钉(直径7.0mm,长45mm),第二组另一侧拧入TSRH螺钉(直径7.0mm,长45mm),第三组另一侧拧入Diapason螺钉(直径6.7mm,长45mm)。分别测试螺钉最大旋入力矩及最大轴向拔出力。结果第一组GSS螺钉最大轴向拔出力为CCD螺钉的114%,SOCON螺钉为CCD螺钉的108%;GSS螺钉最大轴向拔出力大于SOCON螺钉,差异无显著性(P>0.05);GSS螺钉最大旋入力矩小于SOCON螺钉,差异无显著性(P>0.05)。第二组GSS螺钉最大轴向拔出力为CCD螺钉的127%,TSRH螺钉为CCD螺钉的64%;GSS螺钉最大轴向拔出力大于TSRH螺钉,差异有显著性(P<0.01);GSS螺钉最大旋入力矩大于TSRH螺钉,差异有显著性(P<0.01)。第三组GSS螺钉最大轴向拔出力为CCD螺钉的122%,Diapason螺钉为CCD螺钉的8     

胸椎经"椎弓根-肋骨间"螺钉与椎弓根螺钉固定的抗拔出力比较

目的比较胸椎经"椎弓根-肋骨间"螺钉与椎弓根螺钉固定的抗拔出力.方法5例新鲜尸体脊柱(T6～T10)标本,自椎间盘、小关节及上位椎体下肋椎关节处分解为单椎体(附带双侧肋骨)25个.根据配对随机分组的原则,随机选取椎体一侧作椎弓根螺钉固定组,另一侧则为配对的"椎弓根-肋骨间"螺钉固定组,共组成25个配对组.同组中"椎弓根-肋骨间"螺钉长度较椎弓根螺钉长10mm,直径与椎弓根螺钉相同.将25组的50个螺钉分别进行拔出测试(5mm/min的速度垂直方向拔出).结果"椎弓根-肋骨间"螺钉的抗拔出力为423.1±198.7N;椎弓根螺钉的抗拔出力为783.3±199.5N.前者的抗拔出力显著小于后者(P＜0.01).结论"椎弓根-肋骨间"螺钉的力学性能不及椎弓根螺钉,建议仅将前者作为后者的一种补充,特别是在无法完成椎弓根螺钉置入的部分胸椎节段.     

椎弓根劈裂对内固定稳定性影响的生物力学研究

目的探讨椎弓根螺钉内固定时椎弓根皮质劈裂对骨折椎体稳定性的影响。方法取新鲜成年羊胸腰椎脊柱标本(T14~L2)20具,随机分为A、B两组。在A组和B组标本的L1椎体上分别制作单椎体压缩骨折模型,再单独对B组标本T14胸椎任意一侧的椎弓根行外侧(1/4~1/2)切除,作为椎弓根劈裂椎体骨折模型。然后对A、B两组分别置钉,进钉深度为钉道全长。标本模型固定后,在HY-3080微机控制电子万能材料试验机上,以频率为1.5 Hz的载荷对两组标本模型行10 000次疲劳实验,分别测量疲劳实验后两组标本前屈、后伸、左侧弯、右侧弯4个方向运动范围的大小和疲劳实验后两组标本模型螺钉拔出力大小,并比较两组差异。结果疲劳实验后A组各个方向活动范围:前屈(1.81±0.14)mm,后伸(1.68±0.37)mm,左侧弯(4.08±0.41)mm,右侧弯(4.18±0.12)mm;B组各个方向活动范围大小:前屈(4.49±0.40)mm,后伸(3.72±0.51)mm,左侧弯(6.67±0.64)mm,右侧弯(6.73±0.58)mm;A组各个方向活动范围均小于B组(P0.01)。疲劳实验后A组螺钉最大拔出力为(252.34±51.27)N,B组螺钉最大拔出力为(115.50±36.74)N,最大拔出力A组大于B组(P0.01)。结论椎弓根皮质劈裂将严重影响骨折椎体内固定的稳定性。     

新型寰椎内径锥形螺钉的设计与拔出力的测试

目的比较两种设计的寰椎椎弓根钉的最大拔出力,为临床选择寰椎推弓根钉类型提供生物力学依据。方法设计制作两种寰椎椎弓根钉,根据螺纹部分分为皮质骨螺钉(A型螺钉)、内径锥形螺钉(B型螺钉),利用24节新鲜猪寰椎标本,置入两种类型的椎弓根钉,进行拔出试验,测定每种螺钉的最大拔出力,进行统计学分析比较。结果同一长度,不同设计的螺钉抗拔出力接近,均无显著性差异;同一直径两种设计的螺钉,28 mm比26 mm的抗拔出力略大,但均无显著性差异。结论新型寰椎内径锥形螺钉(3.0 mm)抗拔力高,螺钉根部强度好,抗弯曲、断裂性能好,可提供足够的即刻稳定性,是寰椎椎弓根固定的理想螺钉类型。     

不同椎弓根螺钉固定及骨水泥强化方法在骨质疏松骶骨上锚定强度的比较

目的:通过比较不同椎弓根螺钉固定及骨水泥强化方法在骨质疏松骶骨上的锚定强度,探讨骶骨椎弓根螺钉松动后的理想补救技术.方法:应用11具成人新鲜骶骨标本,经骨密度测试确认为骨质疏松后,在同一骶骨标本上,依次建立5种骶骨螺钉固定模型,A组,单皮质椎弓根螺钉固定(左侧):B组,双皮质椎弓根螺钉固定(右侧);C组,PMMA钉道强化后单皮质椎弓根螺钉固定(建立于A组螺钉拔出后);D组,PMMA钉道强化后侧翼钉固定(右侧);E组,后凸成形技术支持下的PMMA强化后侧翼钉固定(左侧).应用MTS材料测试机进行轴向拔出测试,记录各种骶骨螺钉固定技术的最大拔出力并进行比较.结果:11具标本的骨密度为0.55～0.79g,cm~2,平均0.71±0.08g/cm~2.A～E组最大拔出力分别为508±128N、685±126N、846±230N、543±121N和702±144N.A组与D组间无显著性差异(P>0.05),且均显著低于B、C和E组(P<0.05);B组与E组间无显著性差异(P>0.05),但两组的拔出力均显著低于C组(P<0.05).结论:在骨质疏松患者的骶骨固定中,双皮质骶骨椎弓根钉较单皮质具有更高的锚定强度.骶骨椎弓根钉一旦发生松动,PMMA钉道强化和后凸成形技术支持下的PMMA强化后的侧翼钉固定均可成为理想的补救手段.     

椎弓根螺钉把持椎弓根皮质骨对其固定强度的影响

目的：了解椎弓根螺钉把持椎弓根皮质骨对椎弓根螺钉固定强度的影响。方法：将成年羊腰椎椎弓根48个依据椎弓根皮质骨内径和椎弓根螺钉直径（6．25mm）的相对关系分为三组：A组，螺钉直径小于椎弓根皮质骨内径：B组．螺钉直径超出椎弓根皮质骨内径0.01～0．50mm；C组，螺钉直径超出椎弓根皮质骨内径0.51～1．00mm。每组再根据进钉深度与椎弓根长度（平均约8mm）的相对关系分为Ⅰ（进钉深度为16mm）、Ⅱ（进钉深度为8mm）两组。将椎弓根螺钉置入椎弓根中，观察钉道结构、膨胀情况，测量椎弓根螺钉最大轴向拔出力。结果：椎弓根螺钉置入后，椎弓根发生不同程度膨胀；椎弓根螺纹能够切入皮质骨中；C Ⅰ组最大轴向拔出力比A Ⅰ组和B Ⅰ组大（P〈0．05），C Ⅱ组最大轴向拔出力比A Ⅱ组和B Ⅱ组大（P〈0．05），B Ⅱ组比A Ⅱ组大（P〈0.05）。结论：椎弓根螺钉把持椎弓根皮质骨能够增加椎弓根螺钉的固定强度；且椎弓根螺钉把持椎弓根皮质骨量越大，固定强度越大。     

髂骨螺钉松动四种翻修技术的生物力学比较

目的:比较松质骨填塞钉道、增加螺钉长度、传统聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(polymethylmethacrylate,PMMA)强化钉道和外板开窗PMMA强化钉道四种方法翻修松动髂骨螺钉后的固定强度,探讨髂骨螺钉松动的理想补救手段。方法:8具成人防腐尸体骨盆标本,经双能X光吸收法测定骨密度后,将直径7.5mm髂骨短钉(长度为70mm)分别置入左右髂骨(A组),通过MTS材料实验机向螺钉尾部施加100～300N垂直循环载荷2000次后,测试髂骨螺钉的轴向拔出力。用松质骨紧密填塞两侧钉道后,在左侧钉道内置入短钉(B组),右侧钉道置入长度为100mm的髂骨长钉(C组),重复上述测试。将左侧钉道内注满PMMA后,再次置入髂骨短钉(D组);将另1枚髂骨短钉置入右侧钉道,以螺钉中点为中心沿螺钉轴线的髂骨外板处开窗,高度20mm、长度40mm、深度至内板皮质,灌注PMMA(E组);D组和E组重复上述测试。记录各组髂骨螺钉的轴向最大拔出力并进行比较。结果:8具标本的骨密度为0.75～0.91g/cm2,平均为0.85±0.05g/cm2。A～E组的最大拔出力分别为1174±542N、261±89N、769±317N、1954±623N和1820±659N,D组与E组比较无显著性差异(P0.05),D组与E组显著高于A、B和C组(P0.05),C组显著高于B组(P0.05),B组和C组显著低于A组(P0.05)。结论:松质骨填塞钉道和增加螺钉长度不能恢复髂骨螺钉的锚定强度;外板开窗PMMA强化和传统PMMA强化后置钉可使髂骨螺钉获得更高的锚定强度;从微创角度,外板开窗PMMA强化可能成为髂骨螺钉松动的理想补救手段。     

膨胀式脊柱内固定系统椎弓根螺钉翻修作用的生物力学研究

目的：评价自行设计的膨胀式脊柱同定系统（expansive spinal fixation system，ESFS）的椎弓根螺钉对椎弓根螺钉固定失败后的翻修作用。方法：将30个深低温冰冻的正常成人腰椎体标本随机分为A、B、C三组．每组10个椎体（20侧椎弓根）。各组标本每个椎体的两侧椎弓根均先拧入直径6．0mm、长45mm的CD-Ⅱ螺钉．行螺钉拔出试验，记录螺钉的最大旋入力矩和最大轴向拔出力。然后将CD-Ⅱ螺钉拔出，各组标本每一椎体随机经一侧椎弓根原钉道拧入直径7．0mm、长45mm的ESFS螺钉；A组另一侧椎弓根拧入直径7．0mm、长45mm的CD-Ⅱ螺钉，B组另一侧拧入直径7．0mm、长45mm的TSRH螺钉．C组另一侧拧入直径7．0mm、长45mm的GSS螺钉。分别测试螺钉最大旋入力矩和最大轴向拔出力。结果：A、B、C三组的ESFS螺钉最大轴向拔出力分别为6mm CD-Ⅱ螺钉的113％、110％和112％，而直径7．0mm、长45mm的CD-Ⅱ螺钉、TSRH螺钉和GSS螺钉的最大轴向拔出力分别只有6mm CD-Ⅱ螺钉的80％、82％和88％，各组ESFS螺钉最大轴向拔出力明显高于其它三种螺钉。差异有显著性（P〈0．01）。各组各螺钉最大旋入力矩之间差异无显著性（P〉0．05）。结论：ESFS螺钉具有很好的椎弓根锚固作用及翻修作用。     

聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯强化对骨质疏松椎弓根螺钉固定的生物力学作用

目的探讨聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯 (polymethylmethacrylate,PMMA)骨水泥强化椎弓根螺钉的方法和评价 PMMA强化骨质疏松椎弓根螺钉后的生物力学性质。方法 6具新鲜老年女性胸腰段骨质疏松脊柱标本 (T10～ L5),使用双能 X线骨密度吸收仪测试每个椎体的骨密度,随机取 16个椎体 (32侧椎弓根 ),一侧椎弓根拧入 CCD螺钉,测量最大旋入力偶矩后拔出螺钉作为正常对照组,用 PMMA骨水泥强化椎弓根螺钉作为修复固定组,行螺钉拔出试验;另一侧经导孔直接强化椎弓根螺钉后拔出作为强化固定组,记录三组螺钉的最大轴向拔出力。结果椎体平均骨密度为 (0.445± 0.019)g/cm2;螺钉最大旋入力偶矩为（ 0.525± 0.104） Nm;正常对照组螺钉最大轴向拔出力为 (271.5± 57.3)N;修复固定组为 (765.9± 130.7)N;强化固定组为 (845.7± 105.0)N。 PMMA骨水泥强化或修复骨质疏松椎弓根螺钉后最大抗压力明显高于强化前,差异有非常显著性意义 (P< 0.01)。结论 PMMA骨水泥强化骨质疏松椎弓根螺钉能显著增加螺钉在椎体内的稳固性。     

Long-term results of various therapy concepts in severe pilon fractures

Introduction Intra-articular fractures of the tibia plafond are among the most challenging of orthopaedic problems. This is a retrospective case-control study of surgically treated pilon fractures which was undertaken to compare the internal fixation with the two external fixation methods. Methods This is a case-control study of 55 patients with 55 pilon fractures. There were 36 type C and 19 type B. Of these fractures, 24 were open and 31 closed. Three surgical protocols were used. In 20 patients, Group A, a half pin external fixator with ankle spanning was performed. The mean age of patients was 42.0 years (22.0–74.0), SD 14.1 and the mean follow-up was 77.7 months (38.0–132.0), SD 25.4. In 22 patients, Group B, a single ankle sparring ring hybrid external fixator under a small arthrotomy was performed. The mean age of patients was 48.4 years (28.0–76.0), SD 12.4 and mean follow-up was 67.9 months (36.0–132.0), SD 27.8. In 13 patients, Group C, a two-staged internal fixation was performed. The mean age was 45.6 years (30.0–66.0), SD 9.7 and the mean follow-up was 78.6 months (55.0–132.0), SD 25.4. We addressed the dissimilarity of the type of fracture in each group performing supplementary stratified analyses within each fracture type group. Results Group A had union in 6.9 months, group B in 5.6 months and group C in 5.1 months; P = 0.009. Six patients (Group A), two (Group B), and one (Group C) had limitation of ankle motion; P = 0.47. One patient from group C developed infection and the plate was removed. Four patients (Group A), one (Group B), and one (Group C) have developed posttraumatic arthritis (loss of joint space and pain); P = 0.25. Seven patients from Group A have reduced their activities; P = 0.004. In stratified statistical analysis by type of fracture, the associations noted for both fracture groups combined were also noted separately within each fracture group. Conclusion In this long term follow-up study, the two-staged internal fixation and the hybrid fixation with small arthrotomy were equally efficacious in achieving bone union. Patients in external fixation with the ankle spanning had a significantly higher rate of delayed union. Also more patients in this group have reduced their activities. Meeting at which the paper was presented: International Annual Meeting Of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2003, Greece.     

骨外固定加压治疗胫骨干骨不连

目的 :通过观察半环槽式外固定器治疗胫骨骨不连的治疗效果 ,评价加压外固定对骨损伤修复的作用。方法 :采用半环槽式外固定器骨外加压固定治疗胫骨干骨不连 49例 (男 37例 ,女 12例 ) ,骨不连时间为 7～ 132个月。其中 7例感染性骨不连偏侧性骨缺损者 ,行病灶清除开放性植骨 ;5例感染性骨不连行病灶清除、内固定物取出、小腿皮瓣转位 ;10例骨不连、骨缺损伴伤肢短缩者 ,行胫骨干骺端截骨或骨骺牵伸延长。结果 :植骨全部成活 ,创面植皮获Ⅰ期愈合 ,肢体延长幅度 4.5～ 13 .5cm ,平均 7.5cm ,达到预期目标 ,49例患者均于术后 2 .5～ 10个月 ,获得骨愈合 ,平均 5 .4个月。结论 :骨外固定加压治疗胫骨干骨不连不仅具有确实的效果 ,而且有以下优点 :(1)方法简便、创伤小、局部血运干扰少 ;(2 )在局部感染的条件下仍可使用 ;(3)骨端始终保持有均匀的压应力和肢体功能锻炼时产生的生理应力刺激 ,有利于促进骨愈合 ;(4)可配合肢体延长联合使用 ,既治愈了骨不连 ,又均衡了双下肢长度 ,有利于肢体功能恢复。     

Bone healing after metal plate fixation and external fixation of the osteotomized rabbit tibia

Controversy still exists as to the best method of treatment of long bone fractures. The purpose of the present study was to compare the effects on the healing bone of external fixation and metal plate fixation. In an experimental model on the rabbit tibia the stiffness of the fixation corresponded intentionally to that of the same methods in human fracture treatment.

A transverse, midshaft osteotomy was made on one tibia, and fixed with a steel plate (45 × 5 × 1 mm) or external mini-fixation. The animals were killed after 4, 6 or 12 weeks. The bone healing was evaluated by radiography, histology and biomechanical testing in three-point bending. There were no significant differences between plate fixation and external fixation in the pattern of bone healing, as it occurred by periosteal, in-tramedullary and intercortical callus after both methods. The stiffness increased more rapidly than the strength, and reached normal values after about 6 weeks. No significant differences in stiffness between the two methods were found. The strength was significantly greater after plate fixation than after external fixation at 6 weeks, while no significant differences were found at either 4 or 12 weeks.

It is concluded that the speed of bone healing was more rapid after plate fixation. However, in the later stages of healing the plated bones were secondarily weakened because of the stress-protecting effect of the plate.     

Mechanical Testing of Seven Fixation Methods for Generation of Compression Across a Midtarsal Osteotomy: A Comparison of Internal and External Fixation Devices

The purpose of this study was to assess 7 methods of fixation for a midtarsal osteotomy. Polyurethane foam models (N = 6) and cadaver specimens (N = 4-7) were used to examine the force generated by the different constructs of fixation. A midtarsal osteotomy was performed on each specimen in the test groups. The osteotomies were fixated either with 2 parallel 0.062-in Kirschner wires and 40-mm-long, 4-mm partially threaded, cancellous, cannulated titanium screws, an external ring fixator (frame), a frame with wires tensioned (tension), a frame with wires tensioned and compressed toward the osteotomy (tension and compression), a frame with tension, compression, and parallel Kirschner wires, or a frame with tension, compression, and two 4.0 cannulated parallel screws, respectively. Each model was fixated, and the force generated by the construct across the osteotomy was recorded via the use of pressure-sensitive film. Statistical analysis of the data in the polyurethane foam group determined that the use of frame with tension, compression, and two 4.0 parallel cannulated screws was statistically superior to 1) frame, 2) frame with tension, 3) 2 parallel Kirschner wires, 4) two 4.0 cannulated parallel screws, and 5) frame with tension and compression. A cadaver study determined that the frame with tension, compression, and 2 parallel Kirschner wires was statistically superior to 1) frame and 2) two parallel Kirschner wires. These findings suggest that there is a difference in the force generated by the type of fixation construct across a midtarsal osteotomy.     

Ensuring precision in lower limb deformity correction through a combination of temporary external fixation followed by internal fixation: Results of a retrospective study

Background:

It is important to plan preoperatively when contemplating internal fixation following deformity correction. Surgeons often find it difficult to retain the achieved correction till the end of internal fixation. To maintain precise correction we used hybrid technique which uses both external and internal fixation. The objective of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of this hybrid technique in achieving and retaining desired correction.

Materials and Methods:

In this retrospective study, we evaluated the magnitude of deformity with radiological parameters. We compared correction which was planned and correction which was achieved. The technique was used during surgery for corrective osteotomies. Before carrying out the osteotomy, rail fixator with two swivel clamps was applied. After osteotomy swivel clamps were loosened. Desired correction was achieved. While fixator held the fragments in corrected position, definitive internal fixation was carried out. External fixator was removed after completion of internal fixation. Position of mechanical axis ratio, mechanical lateral distal femoral angle and mechanical medial proximal tibial angle were measured before and 12 weeks after surgery. Student t-test was used to analyze the difference between correction which was planned and correction which was achieved.

Results:

There was no statistical difference between the desired correction and the correction achieved.

Conclusions:

Temporary use of external fixator while correcting angular deformities of lower limb allows to achieve accurate correction.     

夹板固定内翻位锻炼治疗踝部旋前外旋型Ⅲ度骨折

目的 探讨内翻位锻炼对距骨、内踝关节间隙的影响。方法 手法整复后,在小夹板的轻度内翻内旋微跖屈位固定下,每日将足放在内翻位进行稍用力的内翻活动10余次,每次10－15分钟,持续内翻锻炼4周。结果 25例患者的距骨、内踝的关节间隙均正常,腓骨、内踝均对位良好或佳,1例好转,全部有效。结论 及早进行内翻的功能锻炼,可使外翻分离的内踝骨折逐步复位,使踝关节功能早日恢复。     

骨盆骨折的手术治疗

目的 :探讨骨盆骨折各种手术方法的适应证及治疗效果。方法 :选择 3 2例骨盆骨折手术治疗病人 ,根据Tile’s分型及病人情况选择手术方法。多发伤、Tile’sB型早期 (平均 6.2h )行骨折闭合复位及外固定架固定 ,单纯骨盆骨折、Tile’sC型在伤后 5～ 7d行开放复位 ,用 3 .5～ 4.5mm重建钢板、拉力螺钉固定。结果 :本组 3 0例得到随访 ,平均随访 2 3 .4个月 ,骨折均愈合良好 ,肢体功能恢复良好。结论 :对于骨盆骨折 ,无论采取哪一种治疗方法 ,只要适应证选择得当 ,均能获得良好效果。     

肩胛骨骨折的手术治疗

目的探讨肩胛骨骨折的手术适应证与手术复位内固定的临床效果。方法自1998年2月至2003年6月，对一组26例经手术复位内固定治疗的肩胛骨骨折患者进行回顾性分析，骨折按Hardegger分型，肩胛体部骨折14处，肩胛颈部骨折12处，其中解剖颈骨折1处，外科颈骨折11处，肩胛冈骨折5处，肩峰骨折4处，肩胛盂窝骨折5处。手术入路采用肩胛骨外侧缘入路17例，肩关节后方入路9例。术后早期行功能锻炼。结果本组26例均获随访，随访时间为12～56个月，平均30．5个月。X线片显示，所有患者均在8～12周达到骨性愈合，平均9周。根据Hardeg—ger功能评定标准评定，优16例，良7例，可2例，差1例，优良率为88．5％。术后创伤性关节炎2例，异位骨化1例，无伤口感染和骨不连。结论手术治疗肩胛骨骨折恢复了肩关节的动力平衡和稳定性，是一种安全可靠的治疗方法．合理的运用手术入路和内固定方式，早期行功能锻炼，可取得满意的临床疗效。     

Pilon骨折三种不同治疗方法疗效探讨

目的探讨Pilon骨折的三种不同治疗方法临床适应证及其疗效评价。方法对2000年2月至2006年3月间治疗的63例Pilon骨折患者进行回顾性分析。其中开放性损伤15例，闭合性损伤48例。根据骨折类型与周围软组织损伤程度，分别采用三种不同治疗方法：跟骨牵引加小夹板固定组（29例）均为闭合性骨折，内固定组（23例），外固定器组（11例）。结果所有患者均获得随访，随访8～31个月（平均15．3个月），骨愈合时间8～14周，平均10周。按Helfet疗效评价标准，本组优良者57例（90．5％），其中Ⅰ型骨折优良者26例，Ⅱ型骨折优良者15例，Ⅲ型骨折优良者16例。结论根据骨折类型及软组织条件，恰当选择固定方法是取得Pilon骨折满意疗效的关键，可有效避免并发症的发生。     

动力跨关节型外固定架在不稳定性桡骨远端骨折中的应用

目的 探讨手法复位或辅以有限内固定结合动力跨关节型外固定架跨腕关节固定治疗不稳定性桡骨远端骨折的效果.方法 应用手法复位或辅以内固定结合动力跨关节型外固定架跨腕关节固定治疗35例不稳定性桡骨远端骨折,骨折愈合后拆除外固定架.结果 随访6～16个月,骨折愈合时间7～9周.最后一次随访时,按Cooney腕关节评分系统(包括疼痛、功能状况、腕关节活动度、握力):优18例,良14例,可1例,优良率为91.4%.结论 手法复位或辅以有限内固定结合动力跨关节型外固定架跨腕关节固定治疗桡骨远端骨折既能使骨折复位、固定满意,又有利于术后早期手和腕部的功能康复锻炼,是治疗不稳定性桡骨远端骨折的有效方法.