Follow-up study of morbidity in patients with angina pectoris and normal coronary angiograms and the value of investigation for esophageal dysfunction

A postal questionnaire was used to assess the symptoms, use of medical facilities, and employment status of patients with angina pectoris and normal coronary angiograms following cardiac catheterization. In a retrospective study of 187 patients, 66 had left ventricular dysfunction demonstrated by abnormal regional wall motion and 121 had normal left ventricular function. At follow-up twelve to forty-six months following catheterization, 89% with left ventricular dysfunction and 82% with normal ventricular function had continued to experience chest pain. There was no significant change in the admission rate to hospital because of chest pain or the proportion of patients who were working, after catheterization as compared with before, in either group. Some patients with left ventricular regional wall motion abnormalities appeared to have progressive left ventricular dysfunction. In a prospective study of 63 patients, detailed investigation of esophageal function was performed. Twenty-two patients had left ventricular wall motion abnormalities. The majority of the 41 patients with normal left ventricular wall motion had esophageal abnormalities that were treated appropriately. At follow-up six to twenty-four months following catheterization significantly fewer patients with normal left ventricular function continued to experience chest pain compared with those with left ventricular dysfunction. Following catheterization the hospital admission rate fell significantly and the proportion of patients working increased significantly in the group with normal left ventricular function. The hospital admission rate and employment status of patients with left ventricular dysfunction did not change significantly following angiography. These findings suggest, therefore, that investigation for and treatment of esophageal dysfunction should be performed in patients with angina pectoris, normal coronary angiograms, and normal left ventricular function.     

Aorto-coronary bypass surgery in 62 patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction--a follow-up study

Long-term follow-up of 62 consecutive patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction = less than 0.30) and disabling angina pectoris following aorto-coronary bypass surgery was investigated. Prior to surgery all patients had angina pectoris and a history of remote myocardial infarction, 35% were in congestive heart failure (CHF). Significant stenoses in 3 major coronary vessels were present in 51 patients (82%). An average of 3.5 grafts per patient were employed. Operative mortality (30 days) rate was 4.8% (3 patients) and 13 patients died during the following period. The average follow-up was 37 months (range: 6 to 116 months). At follow-up, the 5-year survival probability for these patients was 70% (SD = 9%). Thirty-one patients (67%) of the 46 survivors had complete relief of angina, but signs of CHF were still evident in 17 patients (36%). Compared to patients with ejection fractions above 0.30% (surgical mortality 1.4% and 5-year survival rate 94% (SD = 3%] the outcome of coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with poor left ventricular function showed a significantly higher surgical mortality (P = 0.03) and impaired long-term survival (P = 0.02). However, aorto-coronary bypass grafting can be performed in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction with reasonable relief of angina and with an acceptable surgical mortality.     

Early and mid-term impacts of cardiopulmonary bypass on coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with poor left ventricular dysfunction: a propensity score analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary bypass may exacerbate myocardial damage in compromised left ventricles. Early and mid-term outcomes of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) vs on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (On-pump CABG) were compared in patients with poor left ventricular dysfunction, using an analysis of a propensity score matching. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between December 2000 and November 2005, 1,473 patients underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting in our institute and 153 patients who had a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) lower than 35% were enrolled. The OPCAB group contained 100 patients and the On-pump CABG group contained 53 patients. Preoperative risk factors were compared and 50 patients in each group were matched. The mean follow-up time was 35.5+/-17.3 months. Three deaths (3.0%) occurred in the matched cohort, with no significant difference between 2 groups. The operation time, ventilation time, intensive care unit admission time and occurrence of respiratory failure were significantly lower in the OPCAB group. The mean LVEF of the 2 groups improved significantly. The overall 6-year actuarial survival rates of the OPCAB and On-pump CABG group were 88.2% and 72.4% (p=0.2), respectively, and there were no significant differences in 6-year rates of freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (p=0.97). CONCLUSIONS: Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with poor left ventricular dysfunction improved myocardial function. Postoperative respiratory failure was significantly related to the cardiopulmonary bypass for surgical myocardial revascularization. Off-pump and On-pump surgical revascularization resulted in equivalent mid-term outcomes.     

Multivessel coronary angioplasty from 1980 to 1989: procedural results and long-term outcome

From June 1980 to January 1989, 3,186 patients had coronary angioplasty of two (2,399 patients) or three (787 patients) of the three major epicardial coronary systems. A mean of 3.6 lesions (range 2 to 14) were dilated per patient, with a 96% success rate. Acute complications were seen in 94 patients (2.9%) and included Q wave infarction in 47 (1.4%), urgent coronary artery bypass surgery in 33 (1%) and death in 31 (1%). Multivariate correlates of in-hospital death included impaired left ventricular function, age greater than or equal to 70 years and female gender. Complete long-term follow-up data were available for the first 700 patients and the follow-up period averaged 54 +/- 15 months in duration. Actuarial 1 and 5 year survival rates were 97% and 88%, respectively, and were not different in patients with two or three vessel disease. By Cox regression analysis, age greater than or equal to 70 years, left ventricular ejection fraction less than or equal to 40% and prior coronary artery bypass surgery were associated with an increased mortality rate during the follow-up period. Repeat revascularization procedures were required in 322 patients (46%). Restenosis resulted in either repeat angioplasty or bypass surgery in 227 patients (32%). Repeat coronary angioplasty was performed for isolated restenosis in 126 patients (18%), for restenosis and disease progression at new sites in 85 patients (12%) and for new disease progression alone in 54 patients (8%). Coronary bypass surgery was required in 110 patients (16%) during the follow-up period.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Coronary artery bypass surgery in women

Coronary bypass surgery is performed more frequently in men than in women. A selection bias in favor of men may exist in currently utilized evaluation precesses for patients with both chest pain syndromes and documented coronary artery disease. Surgery should be considered in women with significant left main coronary artery stenosis, "left main equivalent" coronary disease, severe three-vessel coronary disease with/without left ventricular dysfunction, two-vessel coronary disease (including a proximal left anterior descending artery stenosis), and unstable angina pectoris with decreased left ventricular function. Women and men undergoing coronary bypass surgery seem to benefit from internal mammary artery grafts used alone or in combination with saphenous vein grafts. Surgical mortality, incomplete revascularization, early and late graft occlusion, and recurrent angina are more prevalent in women who undergo surgery. However, long-term mortality following surgery is similar in men and women.     

Do the presence and amount of dysfunctional but viable myocardium affect the perioperative outcome of coronary artery bypass graft surgery?

The aim of our study was to assess the influence of the presence and amount of dysfunctional but viable myocardium on the perioperative outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease and moderate-to-severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction, who underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Viability evaluation with low-dose dobutamine echocardiography was performed in 302 consecutive patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular ejection fraction < or =40%, who were referred for coronary angiography and potential coronary revascularization. To quantify the amount of dysfunctional but viable myocardium, wall motion was scored using a 16-segment model. The dysfunctional segments were defined as viable if they exhibited improvement in their thickening by at least one grade. One hundred and twenty-seven patients underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The perioperative outcomes were evaluated in 122 of them. Five patients were excluded because of inability to revascularize all vessels supplying dysfunctional but viable myocardial segments. Twenty-five patients exhibited a large amount of dysfunctional but viable myocardium (> or =6 segments, group A), 59 patients had a small amount of such myocardium (2-5 segments, group B), and 38 patients were found to have their dysfunctional myocardium irreversibly damaged (group C). The perioperative mortality in groups A, B, and C was 4, 10, and 11% (all P = NS), respectively. The rate of perioperative Q-wave myocardial infarction was 8, 10, and 3% (all P = NS), respectively. Similarly, there were no significant differences among the groups with respect to perioperative outcome variables including ventricular arrhythmias, duration and magnitude of catecholamine support, renal failure, pulmonary edema, and need for mechanical ventricular support or artificial ventilation. In patients with coronary artery disease and moderate-to-severe left ventricular dysfunction who underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery, the presence and amount of dysfunctional but viable myocardium did not influence the perioperative outcome.     

Coronary bypass surgery improves global and regional left ventricular function following thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. TAMI Study Group

Coronary bypass surgery was performed prior to hospital discharge in 303 (22%) of 1387 consecutive patients enrolled in the TAMI 1 to 3 and 5 trials of intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Bypass surgery was of emergency nature (less than 24 hours from treatment with intravenous thrombolytic therapy) in 36 (2.6%) and was deferred (greater than 24 hours) in 267 (19.3%) patients. The indications for bypass surgery included failed angioplasty (12%); left main or equivalent coronary disease (9%); complex or multivessel coronary disease (62%); recurrent postinfarction angina (13%); and refractory pump dysfunction, mitral regurgitation, ventricular septal rupture or abnormal predischarge functional test (1% each). Although patients having bypass surgery were older (59.5 +/- 9.8 versus 56.0 +/- 10.2 years, (p less than 0.0001), had more extensive coronary artery disease (46% with three-vessel disease versus 11%, (p less than 0.0001), had more frequent diabetes mellitus (19% versus 15%, (p = 0.048), had more prior infarctions (p less than 0.0001), had more severe initial depression in global left ventricular ejection fraction (48.0 +/- 11.9% versus 51.8 +/- 11.9%, p = 0.0002), and regional infarct zone (-2.7 +/- 0.94 versus -2.5 +/- 1.1 SD/chord, p = 0.02) and noninfarct zone function (-0.36 +/- 1.8 versus 0.43 +/- 1.6 SD/chord, p less than 0.0001) than patients not having coronary bypass surgery, no difference in the incidence of death in hospital (7% surgical versus 6% nonsurgical) or death at long-term follow-up of hospital survivors (7% surgical versus 6% nonsurgical) was noted between groups. Surgical patients demonstrated a greater degree of recovery in left ventricular ejection fraction (3.4 +/- 9.8% versus 0.16 +/- 8.5%, p = 0.036) and infarct zone regional function (0.71 +/- 1.1 versus 0.34 +/- 0.99 SD/chord, p = 0.001) when immediate (90 minutes following initiation of thrombolytic therapy) and predischarge (7 to 14 days after treatment) contrast left ventriculograms were compared than did patients who received only intravenous thrombolytic therapy with or without coronary angioplasty. These data suggest a beneficial influence of coronary bypass surgery on left ventricular function and possibly on the clinical outcome of patients initially treated with intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction.     

Intensive care unit readmission after elective coronary artery bypass grafting

Prospective data of 3,120 consecutive patients who had elective coronary artery bypass were analyzed to identify patient profile, cost, outcome and predictors of those readmitted to the intensive care unit. Group A (n=3,002) had a single intensive care unit admission and group B (n=118) were readmitted within 30 days after surgery. Parsonnet score, EuroSCORE, age, body mass index, chronic obstructive airway disease, peripheral vascular disease, renal dysfunction, unstable angina, congestive cardiac failure, and poor left ventricular function were higher in group B. Bypass and crossclamp times were longer, and the prevalence of inotropic and balloon pump support, arrhythmias, myocardial infarction, re-exploration, blood loss and transfusion, cerebrovascular accident, wound infection, sternal dehiscence, and multisystem failure were higher in group B. Despite a 4-fold increase in cost of care, the mortality rate (32.4%) of patients readmitted to intensive care was 23-times higher than routine patients (1.4%). Crossclamp time>80 min, Parsonnet score>10, EuroSCORE>9, sternal dehiscence, ventricular arrhythmias, and renal failure predicted readmission.     

Percutaneous left ventricular assist device: "TandemHeart" for high-risk coronary intervention.

Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with severely compromised left ventricular systolic function and complex coronary lesions, including multivessel disease, left main disease, or bypass graft disease, are at higher risk of adverse outcomes from hemodynamic collapse. The TandemHeart percutaneous ventricular assist device may provide circulatory support during high-risk PCI. We implanted the TandemHeart device in eight patients who underwent high-risk PCI. The patients were considered to be at exceptionally high risk for decompensation due to procedural complexity combined with underlying LV dysfunction. The mean ejection fraction was 30% +/- 9% and five patients were turned down for surgical revascularization. Seven patients underwent multivessel PCI, including three patients who underwent unprotected left main coronary artery PCI. There was 100% procedural success. The TandemHeart was removed immediately post-PCI with no groin complications. Six patients are event- and symptom-free at 189 +/- 130 days; one patient died 10 days post-PCI after lower extremity bypass surgery and another developed acute renal failure postprocedure, requiring hemodialysis. Our initial clinical experience with the TandemHeart ventricular assist device demonstrates that hemodynamic support can be rapidly achieved percutaneously during high-risk PCI, with excellent procedural success in highly complex and critically ill patients.     

Identification of patients with improved survival following coronary bypass surgery

This study was designed to determine whether left ventricular performance measured noninvasively from the systolic time intervals could identify patients in whom coronary bypass surgery may improve survival. 71 patients with two- or three-vessel disease undergoing coronary bypass surgery were compared with 78 matched medically treated patients. All patients had recuperated from myocardial infarction by a mean of 17.6 months when systolic time intervals were performed. Surgical and medical patients were classified preoperatively into those with normal and those with abnormal left ventricular performance by preejection period/left ventricular ejection time (PEP/LVET less than or equal to 0.42 and greater than 0.42, respectively). Survival was analyzed by life table and log-rank test. Cumulative 5-year survival in patients with normal left ventricular performance was not statistically different in surgical and medical groups (96 vs. 93%, respectively). In contrast, cumulative survival in patients with abnormal left ventricular performance was significantly greater in the surgical group when compared to the medical group (84 vs. 62, p less than 0.01). Among the patients with abnormal left ventricular function, the mean PEP/LVET and the average vessel disease were not different in the medical and surgical groups. Multivariate analysis of 17 other clinical and laboratory risk variables were not different between these two groups. It is concluded that coronary bypass surgery my improve survival in patients with two- or three-vessel disease and left ventricular dysfunction.     

严重左心室功能不全冠心病的外科手术治疗

目的总结严重左心室功能不全（LVEF≤35％）冠心病患者行冠状动脉旁路移植术（CABG）的临床经验。方法回顾性研究分析23例有严重左心室功能不全冠心病患者行CABG的临床资料,其中合并左主干病变18例,合并室壁瘤6例,合并室间隔穿孔1例;16例采取非体外循环下冠状动脉旁路移植术,7例在体外循环下行冠状动脉旁路移植术。结果死亡2例,21例患者治愈出院。随诊6～36个月,无死亡．2例患者有心绞痛发作。结论CABG术对有严重左心室功能不全的冠心病是有效的治疗方法,手术效果取决于存活心肌的多少和可再血管化血管的数量。     

In-hospital and one-year outcomes for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction

Previous studies have identified risk factors for short- and long-term outcomes for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, it remains unknown whether they can be generalized to current PCI practice for a broader cohort of patients. We analyzed the follow-up information (mortality and revascularization procedures) obtained from a nationwide Japanese registry during 1997 of a total of 2,211 patients with AMI who underwent PCI at 143 facilities. Demographic, clinical, angiographic, and procedural variables were submitted to statistical analysis to detect the risk factors of adverse outcomes. In-hospital and 1-year mortality rates were 7.1% and 10.9%, respectively. The most important risk factor for in-hospital death was attempted PCI of the left main (LM) coronary artery. Further independent risk factors for death were left ventricular (LV) dysfunction (ejection fraction 相似文献   

Mitral valve surgery in patients with poor left ventricular function

BACKGROUND: Mitral valve surgery for the correction of secondary mitral valve regurgitation (MR) in cardiomyopathy is associated with a poor outcome. Numerous studies have identified a severe left ventricular dysfunction as an indicator for a poor prognosis. The aim of the study was to asses the follow-up after mitral valve surgery and severe left ventricular dysfunction. METHODS: Between 1994 and 2000, 31 patients with mitral regurgitation and a left ventricular ejection fraction of below thirty percent undergoing isolated repair (n = 16) or replacement (n = 15) were investigated. All patients received maximal drug therapy. Twenty-one patients were New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III and 10 were class IV. Follow-up with echocardiography, ECG, and chest x-ray was performed in 87 % of the survivors. The mean duration of follow-up was 39 +/- 16 months. RESULTS: The mean duration of ICU and hospital stay was 3.6 +/- 2.1 days and 8.1 +/- 5.4 days, respectively. The 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates were 91 %, 84 %, and 77 %, respectively. NYHA class improved from 3.3 +/- 0.8 to 2.1 +/- 0.7 at follow-up (p < 0.01). The ejection fraction improved from 23.1 +/- 6.6 % to 36 +/- 6.8 % at follow-up (p < 0.02). Freedom from readmission for heart failure was 85 %, 79 %, and 68 % at 1-, 2-, and 5 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Mitral valve surgery improves left ventricular function and reduces heart failure severity in patients with MR and cardiomyopathy. High-risk mitral valve surgery may be an alternative to heart transplantation in selected patients.     

Predictors of death during 10 years after coronary artery bypass grafting with particular emphasis on age

OBJECTIVES: To describe predictors of death during 10 years of follow-up after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG); to evaluate whether age interacts with the influence of various predictors on outcome; and to compare the mortality during 10 years after CABG with the mortality in an age- and sex-matched control population. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery at Sahlgrenska University Hospital and Scandinavian Heart Centre in G?teborg, Sweden. PARTICIPANTS: All patients from western Sweden who underwent CABG between 1 June 1988 and 1 June 1991 without simultaneous valve surgery and with no previous CABG. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: All-cause mortality during 10 years but more than 30 days after CABG. RESULTS: In all, 2000 patients participated in the survey. The following factors appeared as independent predictors of death: preoperative factors-age, history of congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, history of intermittent claudication, current smoking, degree of left ventricular impairment, valvular disease and duration of angina pectoris; peroperative factors-ventilator time and neurological complications; postoperative factors-arrhythmia, requirement of digitalis and requirement of antidiabetics. There was an interaction between age and history of cerebrovascular disease with a stronger impact on outcome in younger patients. The late (>30 days after CABG) 10-year mortality in the study cohort was 29.6% compared with 25.9% in the control population (P=0.02). CONCLUSION: Among patients who underwent CABG, 13 independent predictors for mortality were found, mainly among preoperative factors but also among peroperative factors, postoperative complications and medication requirement after CABG.     

Clinical outcome 5 years after attempted percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in 427 patients

This study was performed to define the 5 year clinical status of 427 patients who underwent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in 1981. Their mean age was 54 +/- 10 years (+/- 1 SD). Sixty-one percent had unstable angina, 23% had prior myocardial infarction, 86% had one-vessel disease, and 92% had normal left ventricular function. Sixty-seven percent of patients had left anterior descending artery stenosis. Angiographic success was achieved in 84% of patients. Coronary bypass surgery was required in 9.6% of patients, in 5.9% as an emergency procedure. There were no in-hospital deaths. Follow-up at 5 years was 100% complete. There were 15 late deaths (96.3 +/- 1.0% survival), including seven of cardiac cause (98.1 +/- 0.7% cardiac survival). Myocardial infarction occurred in 24 patients (94% freedom from myocardial infarction), coronary bypass surgery was required in 63 (84% freedom from bypass surgery), and 365 patients (85%) were asymptomatic at follow-up. At 5 years, 83 patients (20%) had required an additional PTCA. Unstable angina pectoris and proximal left anterior descending coronary artery stenoses were present in 162 patients. The overall survival and cardiac survival in this subset was 94.4 +/- 1.8% and 98.1 +/- 1.1%, respectively. The excellent survival and low event rates over 5 years in this population support the concept that PTCA is safe and effective for patients with symptomatic angina pectoris, single-vessel disease, and normal left ventricular function.     

Noninvasive screening criteria for enhanced 4-year survival after aortocoronary bypass surgery.

Two thousand one men with coronary heart disease (CHD) who were enrolled in the Exercise Testing Registry of the Seattle Heart Watch had symptom-limited maximal exercise tests at the initial clinical examination and follow-up surveillance of subsequent mortality for 4.1 +/- 1.6 years. When subdivided into three mutually exclusive subgroups, 636 patients did not have exertional myocardial ischemia, left ventricular dysfunction or cardiomegaly; 885 without cardiomegaly had only exertional ischemia; 480 had left ventricular dysfunction by either cardiomegaly and/or two noninvasive exertional criteria, with or without exertional myocardial ischemia. Three hundred thirty-one men had aortocoronary bypass surgery, while 1670 remained unopened for at least 4 years. Only 34% of the operated patients who had left ventricular dysfunction, as defined, showed a marked improvement in 4-year survival rates (p less than 0.01). Differences in the annual CHD mortality rates in relation to surgical treatment in the other two groups were not statistically significant. Restricting the analysis to a subset of patients who had invasive studies did not alter the conclusion. Accordingly, we suggest the use of noninvasive criteria to aid preliminary screening of patients for invasive studies and surgical treatment.     

The influence of surgery on the natural history of angiographically documented left ventricular aneurysm: the Coronary Artery Surgery Study

Coronary artery bypass surgery with or without aneurysmectomy has been used to treat patients with angiographically defined left ventricular aneurysm. To evaluate whether surgery benefits such patients, we analyzed the data from 1131 patients who were enrolled in the registry of the Coronary Artery Surgery Study. Four hundred sixty-seven patients underwent bypass surgery, of which 238 also had left ventricular resection, and 30 had resection alone. The overall operative mortality was 7.9%; the operative mortality was 7% for bypass alone compared with 9% for bypass surgery plus left ventricular resection (NS). Long-term survival by life-table analysis was similar for both medically and surgically treated patients (69% vs 67%, respectively). Cox survival analysis identified congestive heart failure score, duration of chest pain, extent of coronary disease, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, age, and surgical therapy as important predictors of outcome. Patient subsets that showed improved survival with surgical therapy after adjustment for inequities in baseline characteristics were patients with three-vessel disease and those patients in moderate- and high-risk subgroups. Surgical therapy significantly reduced symptoms of angina and use of cardiac medications but the incidence of recurrent infarction was similar for both therapies.     

Comparison of coronary artery bypass grafting versus medical therapy on long-term outcome in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (a 25-year experience from the Duke Cardiovascular Disease Databank)

In this observational treatment comparison in a single center over 25 years, we sought to assess long-term outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) or medical therapy in patients with heart failure, coronary artery disease, and left ventricular systolic dysfunction. The benefit of CABG compared with medical therapy alone in these patients is a source of continuing clinical debate. This analysis considered all patients with New York Heart Association class II or greater symptoms, 1 or more epicardial coronary vessels with a > or = 75% stenosis, and a left ventricular ejection fraction <40% who underwent an initial cardiac catheterization at Duke University Medical Center from 1969 to 1994. Patients were classified into the medical therapy group (n = 1,052) or CABG group (n = 339) depending on which therapy they received within 30 days of catheterization. Cardiovascular event and mortality follow-up commenced on the day of CABG, or at catheterization plus 8 days (the mean time to CABG) for the medical therapy arm. A Cox proportional-hazards model was employed to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics. In the first 30 days from baseline, there was an interaction between treatment strategy and number of diseased vessels. Unadjusted, event-free, and adjusted survival strongly favored CABG over medical therapy after 30 days to >10 years regardless of the extent of coronary disease (p <0.001). Thus, regardless of the severity of coronary disease, heart failure symptoms, or ventricular dysfunction, CABG provides extended event-free and survival advantage over medical therapy alone in patients with an ischemic cardiomyopathy.     

Long-term follow-up of survivors of prehospital sudden cardiac death treated with coronary bypass surgery

Although coronary artery bypass surgery is beneficial to patients with severe coronary artery disease, its role in preventing the recurrence of prehospital cardiac arrest in patients is not clear. In this article, we report on the long-term follow-up of 49 survivors of prehospital coronary arrest who had coronary artery bypass surgery. Prior to their prehospital cardiac arrest, 14% of the patients had a history of unstable angina. Coronary angiograms obtained after prehospital cardiac arrest showed that 71% of the patients had three-vessel coronary artery disease and 6% had single-vessel disease. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 45%. There were four postoperative deaths; three were caused by pump failure, and one was caused by refractory ventricular arrhythmias. After a maximum follow-up period of 102 months (mean of 55.4 months), there were seven cardiac deaths; five of the patients died of recurrent ventricular fibrillation, and two patients' deaths were related to refractory heart failure. Actuarial analyses of the 49 patients showed that the probability of survival at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, and 5 years was 92%, 92%, 89%, 82%, and 72%, respectively. After surgery, 35 of the 45 patients who were discharged from the hospital were asymptomatic, and 23 of the 32 patients who were employed when their prehospital cardiac arrest occurred returned to their employment. We concluded that coronary artery bypass surgery is beneficial to certain survivors of prehospital sudden death. After surgery, most patients are asymptomatic and capable of returning to their employment and the recurrence of prehospital sudden death is low.     

CABG in the elderly: the Glasgow experience

One hundred and eleven patients over the age of 65 years who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting in Glasgow between 1980 and 1985 were compared with 548 younger patients, who had coronary artery bypass surgery over a similar period of time. The elderly group had a higher prevalence of females, pre-operative unstable angina, left main coronary artery disease and depressed left ventricular function. There were no significant differences between the two groups in operative morbidity or mortality and angina was abolished or improved in 93% of the elderly patients at follow-up. Coronary artery surgery has an important role in the management of angina in elderly patients.