Ex vivo response to aspirin differs in stroke patients with single or recurrent events: a pilot study

The dose of aspirin for secondary stroke prevention and the clinical meaning of ex vivo platelet abnormalities are debated. We assessed prospectively 39 noncardioembolic stroke patients in which 300 mg/day aspirin had proved effective (n=24) or ineffective (n=15) to prevent recurrent ischemic events. We evaluated platelet aggregation induced by arachidonic acid, adenosine diphosphate and epinephrine, and the sensitivity of platelets to increasing concentrations of the synthetic thromboxane mimetic U46619. Aggregation studies were repeated while subjects received 300 (study phase 1), and 600 (study phase 2) mg/day aspirin, respectively. Overall, arachidonic acid-induced platelet aggregation was less effectively inhibited during study phase 1 compared to phase 2. Arachidonic acid and epinephrine promoted a stronger platelet aggregation in aspirin nonresponders than in aspirin responders while taking 300 mg/day aspirin. On the other hand, 600 mg/day effectively inhibited platelet function in both clinical groups. A lower sensitivity to thromboxane receptors was also found during phase 1 of the study, although the response was similar between aspirin responders and nonresponders. This pilot study suggests that 300 mg/day aspirin is less effective than 600 mg/day to block the cyclooxygenase pathway in noncardioembolic stroke and, incomplete cyclooxygenase inhibition is associated with recurrent thromboembolic events despite adequate aspirin compliance. It is likely that patients could receive a more efficacious stroke prevention if the dose of aspirin is tailored to individual needs as reflected by laboratory findings.     

Aspirin platelet reactivity on platelet function and clinical outcome in minor stroke or transient ischemic attack

ObjectiveWhether aspirin platelet reactivity affects platelet function and clinical outcomes with different antiplatelet therapies in patients with mild stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) remains unclear. We conducted a subgroup analysis of the PRINCE trial.Materials and methodsPatients with mild stroke or TIA were randomized into aspirin+ticagrelor, or aspirin+clopidogrel groups; aspirin reaction units (ARU) were measured at the baseline and after 7 ± 2 days to assess response to treatment. High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) was defined as ≥550 ARU (poor response to aspirin). The platelet functions of ticagrelor and clopidogrel were measured using the VerifyNow P2Y₁₂ assay for P2Y₁₂ reaction units (PRU); HPR to P2Y₁₂ was defined as >208 PRU (poor response to P2Y₁₂). Clinical outcomes included stroke and clinical vascular and bleeding events after 90 days.ResultsAmong 628 enrolled patients, 69 (11%) were poor aspirin responders. After 7 ± 2 days, the proportion of poor P2Y₁₂ responders for ticagrelor versus clopidogrel significantly reduced in poor (2.6% versus 27.4%) and good (14.3% versus 29.4%) aspirin responders. There were significant interactions between treatment groups, and between treatment groups and aspirin platelet reactivity for poor P2Y₁₂ responders (P = 0.01). After 90 ± 7 days, there were no significant interactions between treatment groups and aspirin platelet reactivity for new stroke risk (good aspirin responders: 5.5% versus 8.8%, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32 to 1.16; P = 0.13; poor aspirin responders: 8.6% versus 8.8%, HR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.20–4.81; P = 0.97; P for interaction = 0.60). Major bleeding was less frequent in poor than good aspirin responders (ticagrelor/aspirin: 0.4%/0%; clopidogrel/aspirin: 1.4%/0%).ConclusionsIn patients with minor stroke or TIA, clopidogrel, and particularly ticagrelor, decreased platelet function in poor versus good aspirin responders. The poor platelet reactivity of aspirin could not sufficiently reduce the risk of recurrent stroke with ticagrelor or clopidogrel; however, HPR (poor aspirin response) may have a protective effect on clinically relevant major bleeding.     

Antiplatelet drugs in ischemic stroke prevention: from monotherapy to combined treatment

Aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) is the most widely studied and prescribed antiplatelet drug for patients at high risk of vascular disease. It affects a single pathway in the platelet activation process and provides incomplete protection against cardiovascular events. Adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonists, by blocking an alternate pathway of platelet activation, are slightly more effective than aspirin in reducing serious vascular events in patients at high risk, with similar results for the subset of transient ischaemic attack/ischaemic stroke patients. Clopidogrel is an effective and safe alternative in patients who do not tolerate aspirin, in diabetics, in hypercholesterolaemic patients, or in those with a previous history of cardiac surgery. Moreover, antiplatelet combination therapy using agents with different mechanisms of action is an attractive preventive approach. In this way, dipyridamole combined with aspirin is being tested in the European/Australian Stroke Prevention in Reversible Ischaemia Trial (ESPRIT) in cerebrovascular disease patients. Clinical and preclinical studies have demonstrated that therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin provides synergistic antiplatelet effects. The Clopidogrel in Unstable Angina to Prevent Recurrent Events (CURE) and PCI-CURE trials demonstrate the benefit of this combination therapy in patients who suffer from unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction treated or not by percutaneous coronary intervention. The relative risk reduction in ischaemic events in long-term use was 20%. This antiplatelet regimen was safe and well tolerated. Currently, this therapeutic option is tested in individuals with ischaemic stroke in the Management of Atherothrombosis with Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients with Recent Transient Ischaemic Attacks or Ischaemic Stroke (MATCH) Trial.     

Effect of therapy on platelet activating factor-induced aggregation in acute stroke

Platelet activating factor, a potent inducer of in vivo platelet activation and thrombosis, has been shown to be excessively active in acute ischemic stroke patients. Therefore, we studied the effect of aspirin/dipyridamole therapy in inhibiting platelet activating factor-induced platelet activation in acute ischemic stroke patients, 23 taking aspirin/dipyridamole and 21 untreated. Aspirin/dipyridamole-treated patients failed to show suppression of platelet activating factor-induced platelet aggregation even though collagen-induced activation was inhibited, suggesting that platelet activating factor acts by cyclooxygenase-independent mechanisms. Failure to suppress cyclooxygenase-independent mechanisms of platelet activation may explain the limited usefulness of current antiplatelet therapy, aspirin in particular, in stroke prevention. The role of selective platelet activating factor antagonists both in isolation and combined with aspirin needs to be investigated for their usefulness in the treatment and prevention of ischemic stroke.     

ADP‐induced platelet aggregation in acute ischemic stroke patients on aspirin therapy

Background and purpose: Aspirin is an important therapeutic regimen to prevent the recurrent ischemic events or death after acute ischemic stroke. In this study, we evaluated the relationship between the extent of adenosine diphosphate (ADP) ‐induced platelet aggregation and outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients on aspirin therapy. Methods: We selected 107 acute ischemic stroke patients who had been prescribed aspirin and evaluated platelet function test by using optic platelet aggregometer test after 5 days of taking it and investigated the prognosis 90 days after ischemic events. Kaplan–Meyer curve was used for survival analysis. Results: After stratification of the subjected patients by tertiles of ADP‐induced platelet aggregation, the events rates were 7.4%, 9.3% and 30.8% (P = 0.023). In multiple logistic regression analysis, old age over 70 years (OR, 13.7; 95% CI, 2.14–88.07; P = 0.001) and the increased ADP‐induced platelet aggregation had independent significance to the risk of primary end‐points after acute ischemic stroke (OR, 1.1; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.20; P = 0.026). Conclusions: This study showed that the increased ADP‐induced platelet aggregation under using aspirin is associated with poor outcome after acute ischemic stroke.     

Role of antiplatelet drugs in the prevention of cardiovascular events

Antiplatelet drugs have an established place in the prevention of vascular events in a variety of clinical conditions, such as myocardial infarction, stroke and cardiovascular death. Both European and American guidelines recommend the use of antiplatelet drugs in patients with established coronary heart disease and other atherosclerotic disease. In high-risk patients, such as those with post-acute myocardial infarction (AMI), ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack, and in patients with stable or unstable angina, peripheral arterial occlusive disease or atrial fibrillation, antiplatelet treatment may reduce the risk of a serious cardiovascular event by approximately 25%, including reduction of non-fatal myocardial infarction by 1/6, non-fatal stroke by 1/4 and cardiovascular death by 1/6. Some data indicate that antiplatelet drugs may also have a role in primary prevention. In people who are aged over 65 years, or have hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, diabetes, obesity or familial history of myocardial infarction at young age, aspirin may reduce both cardiovascular deaths and total cardiovascular events. Aspirin has been studied and used most extensively. It may exert its beneficial effect not only by acting on platelets, but also by other mechanisms, such as preventing thromboxane A₂ (TXA₂)-induced vasoconstriction or reducing inflammation. Indeed, experimental data show that low-dose aspirin may suppress vascular inflammation and thereby increase the stability of atherosclerotic plaque. Moreover, in human studies, aspirin seems to be most effective in those with elevated C-reactive protein levels. Vascular events, however, do occur despite aspirin administration. This may be due to platelet activation by pathways not blocked by aspirin, intake of drugs that interfere with aspirin effect or aspirin resistance. In the CAPRIE (Clopidogrel vs. Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischaemic Events) study, long-term clopidogrel administered to patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease was more effective than aspirin in reducing the combined risk of ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction or vascular death. In the setting of coronary stenting, a double regimen including aspirin and ticlopidine or clopidogrel has proved more effective in the prevention of in-stent thrombosis than aspirin alone. Chronic oral administration of the inhibitors of platelet membrane receptor GP IIb/IIIa has been largely disappointing.     

The C50T polymorphism of the cyclooxygenase-1 gene and the risk of thrombotic events during low-dose therapy with acetyl salicylic acid

Aspirin prevents thrombotic events by inhibiting platelet cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1), thus reducing thromboxane A2 formation and platelet aggregation. The C50T polymorphism of COX-1 is associated with an impaired inhibition of both thromboxane production and in-vitro platelet aggregation by aspirin. We studied whether this polymorphism is also associated with the risk of clinical thrombotic events in patients using aspirin. We included 496 patients admitted to our Coronary Care Unit for various indications treated with aspirin 80 mg daily. Genotyping for the C50T polymorphism demonstrated that 86.7% of the patients had the common genotype, and 13.3% had the variant (12.5% heterozygous, 0.8% homozygous). Baseline variables were well balanced, except that patients with the common genotype more frequently used aspirin prior to admission compared to those patients with the variant genotype. The composite primary endpoint of myocardial infarction, stroke, and/or cardiovascular death occurred in 98 patients (19.8%). Myocardial infarction occurred in 9.6% of patients, stroke in 1.6%, and cardiovascular death in 12.1%. The unadjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) for the primary endpoint for patients with the variant versus the common genotype was 1.07 (0.62-1.85), p = 0.8. The adjusted hazard ratio was 0.86 (0.49-1.50), p = 0.6. In prior laboratory studies the COX-1 C50T polymorphism was associated with an impaired inhibitory effect of aspirin on thromboxane production and platelet function. However, in this cohort of patients using low-dose aspirin for secondary prevention the polymorphism was not associated with a higher risk of atherothrombotic events.     

A pilot study of resistance to aspirin in stroke patients

Aspirin resistance has been shown to be a significant risk factor for recurrent cardiovascular ischaemic events. However, there are a lack of data correlating aspirin resistance and risk of cerebrovascular ischaemic events. This pilot study aimed to determine the prevalence of aspirin resistance in an Australian stroke population and to correlate aspirin resistance with an increased risk of ischaemic stroke. Fifty patients treated with aspirin for 2 years were tested for aspirin resistance using the Ultegra Rapid Platelet Function Assay (Accumetrics, San Diego, CA, USA) on admission to Royal Melbourne Hospital for ischaemic stroke. The 2-year history of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack (TIA) were assessed. Prevalence of aspirin resistance among our patients was 30%. Univariate analysis suggested a non-significant trend towards increased rate of previous ischaemic stroke or TIA and aspirin resistance (odds ratio, OR=3.88; 95% confidence interval 0.54-29.87; p=0.18). This study shows that aspirin resistance is prevalent within the Australian ischaemic stroke population.     

Aspirin resistance in secondary stroke prevention

BACKGROUND: We investigated the platelet function in stroke patients treated with aspirin [acetylsalicylic acid (ASA)] for secondary stroke prevention during a follow-up period of 1 year. METHODS: In this prospective study 291 patients with first initiated aspirin therapy (300 mg/day) for secondary stroke prevention were included. Platelet aggregation measurements were performed 24 h, 3, 6, and 12 months after starting medication. RESULTS: Twenty-one of 291 patients (7.2%) were identified as primary ASA-non-responders (initial insufficient platelet inhibition) and 4.1% as secondary ASA-non-responders (insufficient platelet inhibition during follow-up). There were no significant differences between ASA-responders and ASA-non-responders concerning age, gender, risk factors, and stroke characteristics. CONCLUSION: Aspirin resistance in stroke patients is not uncommon. The clinical usefulness of routine platelet function tests needs to be proved by further trials.     

Variable platelet response to aspirin in patients with ischemic stroke

BACKGROUND: A large number of patients experience ischemic stroke despite treatment with aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid, ASA). It is not clear whether all of these patients with ischemic stroke respond normally to ASA or are hyporesponsive as assessed by inhibition of aggregation and thromboxane (TX) synthesis. METHODS: We studied the effect of ASA given orally and ASA in vitro on collagen- and arachidonic-acid-induced TX formation and aggregation in platelet-rich plasma of 90 patients with ischemic stroke and 25 healthy control subjects. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were being treated with ASA at the time of stroke. Arachidonic-acid-induced TX formation was not depressed below a predefined threshold of 25 ng/ml in 9 patients. Eight of these however exhibited a normal platelet sensitivity to ASA in vitro, suggesting poor compliance or a pharmacokinetic mechanism of nonresponse. The addition of ASA in vitro did not inhibit arachidonic-acid-induced TX formation below the above threshold in 6 patients (11%) in the group of 53 stroke patients not receiving oral ASA, indicating an impaired response to ASA at the platelet level. Moreover, platelets from stroke patients showed an increased collagen-induced, TX-independent aggregation as compared with those of healthy individuals. CONCLUSION: Different categories of ASA nonresponders can be distinguished in patients with ischemic stroke. These include patients with poor bioavailability or noncompliance, an impaired platelet response to ASA in vitro and an increased, TX-independent hyperreactivity to collagen.     

Effect of increasing doses of aspirin on platelet aggregation among stroke patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Aspirin has been shown to reduce the risk of myocardial infarction and stroke. Some investigators believe that low-dose aspirin inhibits platelet aggregation to the same degree as high-dose aspirin. Our study aimed to assess the effect of increasing doses of aspirin on the degree of platelet aggregation induced by collagen and adenosine diphosphate (ADP) among stroke patients. METHODS: Sixteen poststroke patients were prescribed aspirin at daily doses of 40, 80, 160, 325, 650, and 1,300 mg, each dose to be taken for 14 days (total duration 12 weeks). Platelet aggregation studies using 2 microgram/ml collagen and 2 microM ADP were performed on platelet-rich plasma at baseline and on the 14th day of each dose. RESULTS: Platelet aggregation studies using 2 microgram/ml collagen at the start of treatment and at the 14th day of each dose revealed dose-dependent inhibition by aspirin starting at 40 mg/day, but was optimal at 80- 160 mg/day. ADP-induced platelet aggregation inhibition appears to be dose dependent up to 1,300 mg/day. CONCLUSION: Inhibition of collagen-induced platelet aggregation by aspirin appears to be optimal at 80-160 mg/day, while ADP-induced platelet aggregation inhibition by aspirin appears to be dose dependent up to 1,300 mg/day in our poststroke patients, albeit to a less remarkable degree at higher doses.     

Increased basal platelet activity, plasma adiponectin levels, and diabetes mellitus are associated with poor platelet responsiveness to in vitro effect of aspirin

INTRODUCTION: Aspirin is one of the most effective antiplatelet agents and is now commonly used to prevent vascular events. In some patients, however, recurrent vascular events have been demonstrated despite aspirin therapy. Our objective was to characterize individuals showing poor response to in vitro effect of aspirin, using PFA-100. METHODS: One hundred sixty-eight healthy male subjects were analyzed. We assessed platelet function tests, including PFA-100, whole blood aggregation, and optical platelet aggregation. Also measured were hemostatic and other parameters including von Willebrand factor (VWF:Ag), VWF ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo), soluble vascular adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1), high sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and adiponectin. Poor responders were defined as having a collagen/epinephrine-induced closure time (CEPI-CT) under 250 s with PFA-100 when incubated with 10 microM aspirin, whereas good responders were defined as having a CEPI-CT of more than 250 s. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: PFA-100 tests revealed that 40 subjects (24%) were poor responders (PR) and 128 (76%) were good responders (GR). Poor responsiveness was significantly associated with (1) higher basal platelet activities in PFA-100, as well as in whole blood aggregation and aggregometer;(2) increased level of adiponectin (8.8+/-4.1 micro g/mL [PR] vs 7.3+/-2.9 micro g/mL [GR], p=0.010);and (3) the presence of diabetes mellitus (17.5% [PR] vs 4.7% [GR], p=0.009). Importantly, whereas 24% of the subjects showed insufficient inhibition in PFA-100 when incubated with 10 microM aspirin, almost all subjects showed maximum inhibition with 30 microM aspirin. These observations suggest that higher doses of aspirin might overcome aspirin resistance.     

Addition of cilostazol reduces biological aspirin resistance in aspirin users with ischaemic stroke: a double‐blind randomized clinical trial

Background and purpose: Biological aspirin resistance (AR) has been recognized as an important cause of clinical AR. Recent studies have reported the beneficial effects of cilostazol for the prevention of cardiovascular diseases. This study investigated whether addition of cilostazol to aspirin in ischaemic stroke patients can reduce AR. Methods: In this double‐blind multicenter trial, 244 aspirin users with ischaemic stroke were randomly assigned to receive cilostazol 100 mg twice daily or to placebo. Antiplatelet function was assessed using the VerifyNow? Aspirin system. The primary end‐point was the incidence of AR, which was measured as aspirin resistance unit (ARU) ≥550 after 4‐week treatment. Results: The incidence of AR after treatment in cilostazol group was not significantly different from that in placebo (8.8% vs. 10.9%, P = 0.578). However, AR decreased from 12.8% to 8.8% in cilostazol group, whereas it was not changed in the placebo group. The mean ARU after treatment were also lower in the cilostazol group (456.9 ± 56.0 vs. 470.7 ± 67.2, P = 0.081). Cilostazol addition did not prolong bleeding time. Conclusions: Although this was a negative study, our findings disclosed a trend toward enhanced antiplatelet effects when cilostazol was added to aspirin in ischaemic stroke patients. Combination of aspirin and cilostazol might be a treatment option in the ischaemic stroke patients with AR.     

Investigation of alternative mechanisms of collagen-induced platelet activation by using monoclonal antibodies to glycoprotein IIb-IIIa and fibrinogen

Anti-HuPl-ml (reactive with IIIa) and anti-C2G7 (reactive with the carboxyl terminal of the alpha chain of fibrinogen) were used to investigate platelet aggregation, fibrinogen binding and thromboxane synthesis induced by low dose collagen (LDC) or high dose collagen (HDC) in normal or aspirin treated platelets. Anti-HuPl-ml and anti-C2G7 inhibited LDC induced platelet aggregation almost completely whilst abolishing fibrinogen binding; thromboxane production although reduced, still occurred. Thus LDC activation was dependent on fibrinogen binding to Gp IIIa. Aggregation of platelets induced by HDC was inhibited with anti-C2G7 or anti-HuPl-ml by 15-35% in association with a modest reduction in thromboxane (TxB2) production (with anti-HuPl-ml) and total inhibition of fibrinogen binding. When anti-HuPl-ml was added to aspirin treated platelets, aggregation with HDC although substantially reduced was not totally abolished. Collagen appears to activate platelets in a dose related manner in which there are at least three possible mechanisms via: (i) GpIIb-IIIa and associated fibrinogen binding; (ii) prostaglandin pathway; (iii) an alternate pathway responsible for approximately 20%-30% of platelet aggregation.     

Atherothrombosis: a major health burden

Atherosclerosis involves structural change to the intima and media of medium- and large-sized arteries. Although an atherosclerotic plaque may remain clinically silent, it is prone to disruption, leading to local platelet activation and aggregation. Therefore, the major complication of atherosclerosis is thrombosis, with local occlusion or distal embolism - a generalized disease process known as atherothrombosis. The three main clinical manifestations of atherothrombosis are coronary heart disease (myocardial infarction and angina), peripheral arterial disease and cerebral ischaemia. Atherothrombosis is a leading cause of mortality, and stroke is the leading cause of disability in adults, the second most important cause of dementia and the third most common cause of death in Western countries. Ischaemic stroke accounts for 80% of strokes and atherothrombosis accounts for approximately 20% of all strokes. Criteria for atherothrombotic stroke are evidence of a 50% (or greater) stenosis of a cervical artery and exclusion of other potential causes. The incidence of cerebrovascular events is 2,900 per million inhabitants per year, consisting of 500 transient ischaemic attacks and 2,400 strokes, of which 75% are first-ever stroke. The prevalence of stroke in the same population is 12,000, of which 800 patients (7%) per year have recurrences. The risk of ipsilateral stroke is 5% per year and the risk of a cardiac event is higher at 7%. Besides optimal management of risk factors for atherothrombosis and carotid surgery, antiplatelet therapy is the cornerstone of vascular prevention. In secondary prevention, antiplatelet agents are effective in reducing the risk of further ischaemic events in patients with atherothrombosis. Clopidogrel, a newly licensed ADP receptor antagonist, is the only antiplatelet agent to have demonstrated its superiority versus aspirin for the reduction of major ischaemic events (myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, vascular death) in patients whose initial manifestation of atherothrombosis was one of the three main clinical manifestations of the disease (recent ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction, established peripheral arterial disease).     

Increased platelet sensitivity among individuals with aspirin resistance - platelet aggregation to submaximal concentration of arachidonic acid predicts response to antiplatelet therapy

Aspirin 'resistance' (AR) is a phenomenon of uncertain etiology describing decreased platelet inhibition by aspirin. We studied whether (i) platelets in AR demonstrate increased basal sensitivity to a lower degree of stimulation and (ii) platelet aggregation with submaximal stimulation could predict responses to aspirin. Serum thromboxane B(2) (TxB(2)) levels and platelet aggregation with light transmission aggregometry (LTA) were measured at baseline and 24 hours after 325 mg aspirin administration in 58 healthy subjects. AR was defined as the upper sixth of LTA (> or = 12%) to 1.5 mM AA. Baseline platelet aggregation with submaximal concentrations of agonists [ADP 2 microM, arachidonic acid (AA) 0.75 mM, collagen 0.375 and 0.5 microg/ml] was greater in AR subjects compared with non-AR subjects, but not with higher concentrations (ADP 5 microM and 20 microM, AA 1.5 mM and collagen 1 microg/ml). Post-aspirin platelet aggregation was elevated in AR subjects with both submaximal and maximal stimulation. Baseline and post-aspirin serum TxB(2) were higher in AR subjects and decreased further with ex-vivo COX-1 inhibition, suggesting incompletely suppressed COX-1 activity. Pre-aspirin platelet aggregation to 0.75 AA demonstrated a dichotomous response with 29/58 subjects having aggregation < or = 15% and 29/58 subjects having aggregation > or = 75%. In the high aggregation group 28% had AR compared to 6% in the non-AR group (p = 0.04). In conclusion, platelets in AR subjects demonstrate increased basal sensitivity to submaximal stimulation, which could predict responses to antiplatelet therapy.     

Prevalence of clopidogrel non-responders among patients with stable angina pectoris scheduled for elective coronary stent placement

Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel decreases the rate of stent thrombosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, despite intensified antiplatelet treatment, up to 4.7% of the patients undergoing coronary stenting develop thrombotic stent occlusion, suggesting incomplete platelet inhibition due to clopidogrel resistance. We evaluated the percentage of clopidogrel non-responders among 105 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing elective PCI. All patients were treated regularly with aspirin 100 mg/d and received a loading dose of 600 mg clopidogrel followed by a maintenance dose of 75 mg/d before PCI. Clopidogrel non-responders were defined by an inhibition of ADP (5 and 20 Mol/L) induced platelet aggregation that was less than 10% when compared to baseline values 4 h after clopidogrel intake. Semi-responders were identified by an inhibition of 10 to 29%. Patients with an inhibition over 30% were regarded as responders. We found that 5 (ADP 5 Mol/L) to 11% (ADP 20 Mol/L) of the patients were non-responders and 9 to 26% were semi-responders. Among the group of non-responders there were two incidents of subacute stent thrombosis after PCI. We conclude that a subgroup of patients undergoing PCI does not adequately respond to clopidogrel, which may correspond to the occurrence of thromboischemic complications. Point-of-care testing may help to identify these patients who may then benefit from an alternative antiplatelet therapy.     

阿司匹林与氯吡格雷双联对TIA患者凝血功能的影响

目的探讨阿司匹林与氯吡格雷双联对短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)患者血小板聚集率和纤维蛋白原的影响。方法100例短暂性脑缺血发作患者随机分为2组,在常规控制血压、血糖、血脂等基础上,治疗组给予阿司匹林联合氯吡格雷治疗,对照组给予阿司匹林,其中阿司匹林100mg/d,氯吡格雷75mg/d。观察2组血小板聚集率与纤维蛋白原相关指标及临床疗效。结果治疗7~14d后,与对照组比较,治疗组血小板聚集率显著改善(P0.05),纤维蛋白原水平下降更显著(P0.05);治疗组临床疗效显著优于对照组(P0.05)。2组均未出现严重出血并发症。结论阿司匹林与氯吡格雷双联治疗短暂性脑缺血发作可改善患者血小板聚集率,降低纤维蛋白原水平,临床疗效显著。     

Future perspectives for optimizing oral antiplatelet therapy

Secondary prevention of stroke and other manifestations of atherothrombosis is essential if the burden of disease associated with these events is to be reduced. Therefore, it is important to identify patients most likely to benefit from antiplatelet therapy. There is a good rationale for combining antiplatelet agents with different modes of action, since different signalling pathways contribute to platelet activation. Based on the promising results obtained with an adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonist-aspirin combination in coronary stenting, several additional trials with clopidogrel plus aspirin are ongoing. They include CURE (Clopidogrel in Unstable angina to prevent Recurrent Events, in unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction) and COMMIT (in acute myocardial infarction), which compare clopidogrel with placebo in patients receiving aspirin, and CREDO (Clopidogrel for Reduction of Events During extended Observation), a 1-year treatment follow-up to the clopidogrel arms of the CLASSICS trial (Clopidogrel Aspirin Stent International Cooperative Study). Planned trials with clopidogrel in neurology include SPS3 (Secondary Prevention of Small Subcortical Strokes, in patients with symptomatic lacunar stroke), and MATCH (Management of Atherothrombosis with Clopidogrel in High-risk patients, in patients with stroke or transient ischaemic attack plus one additional risk factor), which will compare the efficacy of clopidogrel plus aspirin versus clopidogrel in reducing important ischaemic events. Combination therapy with an oral glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist plus aspirin has so far been less promising. Trials of three compounds--orbofiban, xemilofiban and sibrafiban--in combination with aspirin for secondary prevention in cardiac patients have reported increased mortality compared with aspirin alone. A similar effect was seen when sibrafiban monotherapy was compared directly with aspirin alone. Trials of newer oral GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors are under way or are planned. The combination of dipyridamole plus aspirin appears to be superior to aspirin alone for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke or transient ischaemic attack; the effectiveness of this combination is being further investigated in ESPRIT (European/Australian Stroke Prevention in Reversible Ischaemia Trial).     

Aspirin treatment influences platelet-related inflammatory biomarkers in healthy individuals but not in acute stroke patients

Objectives

Platelet-leukocyte aggregation is believed to contribute to acute thrombotic events. While the effect of aspirin on platelet-to-platelet aggregation is well established, the impact of the drug on pro-inflammatory platelet function remains equivocal. Thus we investigated the effect of aspirin on selected platelet-related inflammatory biomarkers in both acute ischaemic stroke patients and healthy volunteers.

Methods

Using five-colour flow cytometry the platelet surface expression of CD62P and CD40L and subpopulations of leukocyte-platelet aggregates were assessed in 63 acute stroke patients and 40 healthy volunteers at baseline and after a 10-day period of aspirin intake at a daily dose of 150 mg. Simultaneously the plasma levels of soluble CD62P and CD40L, serum level of TxB₂, and whole blood impedance platelet aggregation under arachidonic acid (AA) stimulation were investigated.

Results

No differences in values of studied platelet-related inflammatory biomarkers in both resting platelets and those activated with TRAP after 10-day treatment with aspirin were confirmed in stroke subjects. In healthy individuals the resting platelet expression of CD62P, plasma level of soluble CD62P and percentage of circulating monocyte-platelet aggregates were lower after the aspirin intake period (P = 0.009; P = 0.04; P = 0.004, respectively). In both studied groups serum level of TxB₂ and platelet aggregation under AA stimulation were lower than before treatment (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Despite effective inhibition of COX-1-dependent platelet aggregation, aspirin does not influence the platelet α-granule-derived inflammatory mediators and monocyte-platelet aggregation in acute stroke subjects, although it does in healthy individuals.