Etanercept (ETN) with methotrexate (MTX) is better than ETN monotherapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite MTX therapy: a randomized trial

The superiority of the combination therapy of methotrexate (MTX) and anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) biological agents over anti-TNF monotherapy in MTX-naïve patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been demonstrated. We investigated the efficacy and safety of continuation versus discontinuation of MTX at the commencement of etanercept (ETN) in patients with active RA despite MTX therapy. In total, 151 patients with active RA despite treatment with MTX were randomized to either ETN 25 mg twice a week and MTX 6–8 mg/week (the E + M group) or ETN alone (the E group). Co-primary endpoints included the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) good response rate and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 response rate at week 24. Demographic and clinical features between groups at baseline were similar. The EULAR good response rates were significantly higher in the E + M group (52%) than in the E group (33%) at week 24 (p = 0.0001). Although the ACR50 response rate, one of the co-primary endpoints, and the ACR70 response rate at week 24 were not significantly greater in the E + M group (64 and 38%, respectively) than in the E group (48 and 26%, respectively), the ACR20 response rate was significantly greater in the E + M group (90%) than in the E group (64%; p = 0.0002). Safety profiles were similar for the groups. Thus, MTX should be continued at the commencement of ETN therapy, even in RA patients who show an inappropriate response to MTX.     

Safety and efficacy of combination therapy of iguratimod with methotrexate for patients with active rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to methotrexate: An open-label extension of a randomized,double-blind,placebo-controlled trial

Abstract

Objective. To obtain safety and efficacy data on combination treatment with iguratimod and methotrexate (MTX) in an open-label extension study in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods. Following a 28-week, randomized, double-blind trial of adding iguratimod or placebo to stable MTX therapy, patients entered a 24-week extension. Patients randomized to the iguratimod + MTX group continued treatment. Patients treated with placebo + MTX switched to iguratimod + MTX [the (placebo/iguratimod) + MTX group].

Results. In the iguratimod + MTX group, the rate of 20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20) at week 52 (71.3%) was similar to that at week 24 (69.5%). ACR50, ACR70 and Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index at week 52 significantly improved compared with the values at week 24. In the (placebo/iguratimod + MTX) group, the switch to iguratimod treatment significantly improved ACR20 from 30.7% at week 24 to 72.1% at week 52. Frequent adverse events for 52 weeks in the iguratimod + MTX group were nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract inflammation, stomatitis, lymphocyte decrease, AST increase, ALT increase and blood iron decrease. These adverse events were predominantly mild or moderate in severity. No deaths occurred.

Conclusion. Efficacy and tolerance of iguratimod + MTX therapy was maintained to 52 weeks in patients with active RA with inadequate response to MTX.     

甲氨蝶呤联合环磷酰胺治疗类风湿关节炎随机单盲对照临床研究

目的 评价甲氨蝶呤(MTX)联合环磷酰胺(CTX)及单独应用MTX、单独应用CTX治疗类风湿关节炎(RA)的疗效和安全性.方法 本研究为随机、单盲、对照的临床试验.符合纳入及排除标准的RA患者随机分为单用MTX(10～15 mg/周)、单用CTX(400 mg/2～3周)及MTX联合CTX治疗组(MTX10～15 mg/周+CTX 400 mg/2～3周).疗程24周,在基线、6、12、24周进行疗效及安全性评估.以美国风湿病学会(ACR)疗效评价指标ACR20为主要疗效指标,ACR50、ACR70、欧洲抗风湿联盟(EULAR)疗效指标、疼痛目视模拟测试表(VAS)评分、患者对自身健康状况的总体评估(PGA)、医生总体评价、压痛关节数(TJC)、压痛关节指数(TJI)、肿胀关节数(SJC)、肿胀关节指数(SJI)、健康评估问卷(HAQ)为次要疗效指标.结果 在第24周,MTX+CTX组达ACR20改善的患者比例(81%)高于MTX组(56%)及CTX组(35%),差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).24周时MTX+CTX组达ACR50改善的患者比例高于CTX组(P＜0.05).与MTX组之间差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).在第24周,MTX+CTX组达到EULAR有效的患者比例(77%)高于MTX组(48%)及CTX组(35%),差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).24周时MTX+CTX组在TJC/TJI、SJC/SJI疼痛VAS评分、ESR的改善程度高于MTX组(P＜0.05).在压痛关节数脂数、肿胀关节数/指数、疼痛VAS评分、PGA、医生总体评价、HAQ、ESR的改善程度高于CTX组(P＜0.05).3组之间不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义.结论 MTX联合CTX治疗能显著改善RA的症状、体征和实验室炎性指标,疗效优于单用MTX及单用CTX.两者联合治疗安全耐受性好,与单用MTX及单用CTX相比,并不增加不良反应的发生率.     

Randomized comparison of etanercept with usual therapy in an Asian population with active rheumatoid arthritis: the APPEAL trial

Aim: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an important rheumatologic disease in Asia‐Pacific countries, as in other parts of the world. However, limited information is available regarding RA therapy in this region. The Asia‐Pacific Study in Patients to be Treated With Etanercept or an Alternative Listed DMARD (APPEAL) compared efficacy and safety of etanercept (ETN) + methotrexate (MTX) versus usual disease‐modifying anti‐rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) + MTX (reflecting regional practice) in subjects with moderate to severe RA from multiple Asia‐Pacific countries. Method: In this open‐label, active‐comparator, parallel‐design, multicenter study, subjects (n = 300) in the Asia‐Pacific region were randomized to ETN + MTX (n = 197) or DMARD + MTX (n = 103). The primary efficacy endpoint was the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response (ACR‐N) area under the curve (AUC) over 16 weeks. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. At Week 16, ACR‐N AUC indicated a significantly greater response with ETN + MTX compared with DMARD + MTX (mean difference –145.3; P < 0.001). Significantly greater proportions of subjects achieved ACR 20, 50 and 70 responses with ETN + MTX versus DMARD + MTX at Week 16 (P < 0.05). Low Disease Activity Score based on a 28‐joint count (DAS28 < 3.2) was also achieved by significantly more subjects in the ETN + MTX group versus the DMARD + MTX group (P < 0.001). Greater improvements were shown for DAS28, pain visual analogue scale, health assessment questionnaire, and physician and patient global assessments (P < 0.05) for ETN + MTX versus DMARD + MTX. No new safety signals were found. Conclusion: In this Asia‐Pacific population of subjects with moderate to severe RA, ETN + MTX showed superior efficacy versus usual DMARD + MTX regimens, with similar safety profiles.     

A randomized,double‐blind,placebo‐controlled,phase III study of the human anti‐tumor necrosis factor antibody adalimumab administered as subcutaneous injections in Korean rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with methotrexate

Objective: Adalimumab is a fully human, monoclonal, antitumour necrosis factor antibody approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in more than 60 countries. We investigated the efficacy and safety of 40 mg every‐other‐week (eow) subcutaneous injections of adalimumab with methotrexate (MTX) versus placebo with MTX in Korean patients with RA with insufficient responses to MTX. Methods: This was a 24‐week, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, phase III study conducted at six sites in Korea. The primary efficacy endpoint was a 20% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology response criteria (ACR20) at week 24. Secondary endpoints included ACR50, ACR70, and individual ACR components. Beginning at week 18, non‐responders (< 20% reduction in swollen and tender joint counts) could switch to rescue therapy with open‐label adalimumab 40 mg eow. Results: Of the 128 patients enrolled, 65 received adalimumab and 63 received placebo. An ACR20 response at week 24 was achieved by 61.5% of patients receiving adalimumab versus 36.5% receiving placebo (P < 0.01). ACR50 and ACR70 responses were achieved by 43.1% and 21.5% of adalimumab patients versus 14.3% and 7.9% of placebo patients (P < 0.001 and P < 0.05, respectively). Adalimumab significantly improved all seven ACR core components. Statistically significant improvements in ACR20 were observed with adalimumab as early as week 2. Adalimumab was generally well tolerated; there were no significant differences in incidences of adverse events between groups. Conclusions: In Korean patients with RA with insufficient responses to MTX, combination therapy with adalimumab and MTX was more efficacious than placebo and MTX in reducing RA signs and symptoms.     

Rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis refractory to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy: Results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial evaluating primary efficacy and safety at twenty-four weeks

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of treatment with rituximab plus methotrexate (MTX) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had an inadequate response to anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapies and to explore the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rituximab in this population. METHODS: We evaluated primary efficacy and safety at 24 weeks in patients enrolled in the Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Efficacy of Rituximab in RA (REFLEX) Trial, a 2-year, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study of rituximab therapy. Patients with active RA and an inadequate response to 1 or more anti-TNF agents were randomized to receive intravenous rituximab (1 course, consisting of 2 infusions of 1,000 mg each) or placebo, both with background MTX. The primary efficacy end point was a response on the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) at 24 weeks. Secondary end points were responses on the ACR50 and ACR70 improvement criteria, the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, and the European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria at 24 weeks. Additional end points included scores on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Disability Index (DI), and Short Form 36 (SF-36) instruments, as well as Genant-modified Sharp radiographic scores at 24 weeks. RESULTS: Patients assigned to placebo (n = 209) and rituximab (n = 311) had active, longstanding RA. At week 24, significantly more (P < 0.0001) rituximab-treated patients than placebo-treated patients demonstrated ACR20 (51% versus 18%), ACR50 (27% versus 5%), and ACR70 (12% versus 1%) responses and moderate-to-good EULAR responses (65% versus 22%). All ACR response parameters were significantly improved in rituximab-treated patients, who also had clinically meaningful improvements in fatigue, disability, and health-related quality of life (demonstrated by FACIT-F, HAQ DI, and SF-36 scores, respectively) and showed a trend toward less progression in radiographic end points. Rituximab depleted peripheral CD20+ B cells, but the mean immunoglobulin levels (IgG, IgM, and IgA) remained within normal ranges. Most adverse events occurred with the first rituximab infusion and were of mild-to-moderate severity. The rate of serious infections was 5.2 per 100 patient-years in the rituximab group and 3.7 per 100 patient-years in the placebo group. CONCLUSION: At 24 weeks, a single course of rituximab with concomitant MTX therapy provided significant and clinically meaningful improvements in disease activity in patients with active, longstanding RA who had an inadequate response to 1 or more anti-TNF therapies.     

Dose escalation of parenteral methotrexate in active rheumatoid arthritis that has been unresponsive to conventional doses of methotrexate: a randomized, controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether dose escalation of intramuscular (IM) methotrexate (MTX) up to 45 mg/week improves disease control in patients who have active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite receiving conventional doses (15 mg/week) of IM MTX, and to obtain preliminary data on patient tolerability and adverse effects of higher doses of IM MTX. METHODS: Patients >18 years of age who had active RA, defined as a European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) of >3.2, and who had received 15-20 mg/week of oral MTX for at least 2 months were switched (week 0) to 15 mg/week of IM MTX for 6 weeks. Patients whose DAS28 remained >3.2 at both week 4 and week 6 were randomized, in a double-blind manner, either to continue to receive 15 mg/week IM MTX with monthly placebo escalation or to receive escalating doses of IM MTX monthly up to 45 mg/week. The dose of MTX or placebo was escalated every 4 weeks if the DAS28 was >2.5. Safety assessments and determination of the DAS28 were performed every 2 weeks and monthly, respectively. Disease activity parameters from the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) core disease activity set and health status as recorded on the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 12 were determined at baseline (week 0) and final assessment (week 22). The primary outcome was the percentage of patients in each group achieving a target DAS28 of <3.2. Secondary outcomes comprised the percentage of patients whose DAS28 improved by >1.2, the percentage of patients achieving a 20% improvement in the ACR core disease activity measures (ACR20), and the percentage of patients achieving a good response, a moderate response, or no response in accordance with the EULAR response criteria. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients were eligible for entry and were switched from oral MTX to 15 mg/week IM MTX. At baseline, the mean +/- SD DAS28 was 5.6 +/- 0.88; after 6 weeks of IM MTX, the DAS28 had improved by a mean of 0.42 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.15-0.69). At 6 weeks, 54 patients still had a DAS28 of >3.2 and were therefore eligible for randomization. By 22 weeks, 1 patient (3.7%) in each group achieved the primary outcome of a DAS28 <3.2 (95% CI for the difference between the groups -15% to +15%). Five patients (18.5%) in each group showed an improvement of >1.2 in the DAS28 (95% CI for the difference between the groups -18% to +18%). One patient (3.7%) in each group achieved an ACR20 response, but none achieved a good response as defined by the EULAR response criteria. One patient in each group had a serious adverse reaction; minor adverse reactions were more frequently reported in the dose escalation group. CONCLUSION: Switching from oral to parenteral MTX 15 mg/week results in a minor improvement in disease control. For patients with active RA receiving 15 mg/week IM MTX, increasing the dose up to 45 mg/week does not improve disease control. Higher doses of IM MTX were generally well tolerated and not associated with an increase in serious adverse reactions to the drug.     

Twenty-four-week clinical results of adalimumab therapy in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis: retrospective analysis for the best use of adalimumab in daily practice

Abstract

Objective We evaluated patient drug adherence to and efficacy and safety of adalimumab (ADA) based on data collected from approximately 200 patients to retrospectively examine the best use of ADA in Japanese patients with longstanding rheumatoid arthritis (RA) managed in daily practice.

Methods For explorative comparisons, patients were stratified by prior use or no use of biologics (Bio-naïve vs. Bio-switch) and concomitant use (+) or no use (?) of methotrexate (MTX) into four subgroups. The primary efficacy endpoint was extent of improvement in the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) from baseline to 24 weeks assessed as European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) good response. Secondary endpoints included ADA treatment continuation as represented by Kaplan–Meier survival curves and percentages of patients achieving remission as defined by DAS28-ESR <2.6.

Results Overall, mean DAS28-ESR significantly decreased from 5.6 ± 1.2 at baseline to 4.1 ± 1.7 at week 24 (p < 0.0001), and >30 % of patients achieved EULAR good response. Subgroup analyses indicated that patients in the Bio-naïve and MTX (+) subgroup showed the highest EULAR good response rate of 37.3 % at week 24. The three most commonly reported adverse events (AEs) were skin allergies such as injection-site reactions, infections, and respiratory disorders such as interstitial lung lesions and organizing pneumonia.

Conclusion In conclusion, ADA therapy resulted in significant clinical response in established Japanese patients with RA treated in daily practice. It also demonstrated generally good safety and tolerability. It was suggested that the best use of ADA may be in biologically naïve patients with concomitant administration of MTX.     

Adalimumab,a fully human anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha monoclonal antibody,for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in patients taking concomitant methotrexate: the ARMADA trial

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adalimumab (D2E7), a fully human monoclonal tumor necrosis factor alpha antibody, in combination with methotrexate (MTX) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite treatment with MTX. METHODS: In a 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 271 patients with active RA were randomly assigned to receive injections of adalimumab (20 mg, 40 mg, or 80 mg subcutaneously) or placebo every other week while continuing to take their long-term stable dosage of MTX. The primary efficacy end point was the American College of Rheumatology criteria for 20% improvement (ACR20) at 24 weeks. RESULTS: An ACR20 response at week 24 was achieved by a significantly greater proportion of patients in the 20-mg, 40-mg, and 80-mg adalimumab plus MTX groups (47.8%, 67.2%, and 65.8%, respectively) than in the placebo plus MTX group (14.5%) (P < 0.001). ACR50 response rates with the 20-mg, 40-mg, and 80-mg adalimumab dosages (31.9%, 55.2%, and 42.5%, respectively) were significantly greater than that with placebo (8.1%) (P = 0.003, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively). The 40-mg and 80-mg doses of adalimumab were associated with an ACR70 response (26.9% and 19.2%, respectively) that was statistically significantly greater than that with placebo (4.8%) (P < 0.001 and P = 0.020). Responses were rapid, with the greatest proportion of adalimumab-treated patients achieving an ACR20 response at the first scheduled visit (week 1). Adalimumab was safe and well tolerated; comparable numbers of adalimumab-treated patients and placebo-treated patients reported adverse events. CONCLUSION: The addition of adalimumab at a dosage of 20 mg, 40 mg, or 80 mg administered subcutaneously every other week to long-term MTX therapy in patients with active RA provided significant, rapid, and sustained improvement in disease activity over 24 weeks compared with MTX plus placebo.     

A phase 3 randomized,double-blind,multicenter comparative study evaluating the effect of etanercept versus methotrexate on radiographic outcomes,disease activity,and safety in Japanese subjects with active rheumatoid arthritis

Abstract

Objectives The aim of this phase 3, double-blind study was to compare the radiographic and clinical effects of etanercept (ETN) versus methotrexate (MTX) over 52 weeks in Japanese subjects with active rheumatoid arthritis.

Methods The study population comprised 550 subjects with inadequate response to ≥1 disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs who were randomized to treatment groups of ETN 25 mg twice weekly (BIW; n = 182), ETN 10 mg BIW (n = 192), or MTX (≤8.0 mg/week; n = 176).

Results Of the 550 subjects initially enrolled in the three treatment groups, 21.6 % discontinued the study; a significantly higher proportion of those who withdrew from the study due to lack of efficacy were in the MTX (21.6 %) group compared with the ETN 25 mg (3.3 %) and ETN 10 mg (6.8 %) groups (P < 0.001). Mean change from baseline in the modified total Sharp score at week 52 (primary endpoint) was significantly lower in the ETN 25 mg [3.33; standard error (SE), 0.73] and ETN 10 mg (5.19; SE 0.93) groups than in the MTX group (9.82; SE 1.16; P < 0.0001 vs. either ETN group). Compared with subjects receiving MTX, significantly higher percentages of subjects treated with ETN 25 and 10 mg achieved American College of Rheumatology (ACR) ACR20 and ACR50 response rates at all time points (P < 0.01). ETN was well-tolerated, with no unexpected safety findings.

Conclusions ETN 25 mg BIW and ETN 10 mg BIW slowed radiographic progression and improved clinical outcomes more effectively than MTX in this Japanese population.     

Retrospective clinical study of the efficacy of lower-dose methotrexate and infliximab therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

The objective of this study is to compare the long-term outcomes of infliximab therapy with lower-dose methotrexate (MTX; ≤4 mg per week) and with standard-dose MTX (≥6 mg per week) in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. One hundred thirty-eight patients with refractory RA were treated with intravenous infliximab; 106 patients underwent lower-dose MTX therapy, and 32 patients underwent standard-dose MTX therapy. Treatment responses at 54 weeks or last observation carried forward (LOCF) assessed using the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria were compared between the two groups. Eighty-eight patients (81.1%) in the lower-dose MTX group and 27 patients (84.3%) in the standard-dose MTX therapy completed 54 weeks of infliximab treatment. A EULAR response criteria good and moderate response was seen in 70.9% in the lower-dose group and 74.1% in the standard-dose group. Good and moderate treatment responses at 54 weeks or LOCF were seen in 66.0% in the lower-dose group and 68.7% in the standard-dose group. The outcome in the lower-dose MTX group was not significantly different from that in the standard-dose group. Therapy with MTX and infliximab was effective in Japanese RA patients, regardless of MTX dosage.     

Niclosamide as an adjuvant to etanercept in treatment patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: an 8-week randomized controlled pilot study

This study designed to identify the therapeutic efficacy of niclosamide (NCL) in Iraqi patients suffering from active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were using etanercept (ETN) for more than 3 months and still had high or moderate active RA. One hundred ten patients suffering from active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were using etanercept (ETN) for more than 3 months and still had high or moderate active RA were allocated randomly into two equal groups: one of them treated with 1000 mg/day NCL and the other treated with 1000 mg/day lactose in capsule dosage form. The study duration was 8 weeks. Clinical efficacy of the NCL was measured depending on scoring of the 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28), simple disease activity index (SDAI), clinical disease activity index (CDAI), and Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at the baseline and at the end of the 8-week treatment period. Moreover, blood sample were taken from the patients at baseline and at after 8 weeks of treatment for measurement of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin 1β (IL-1 β), interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α), intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), and E-selectin. At the end of the clinical study, patients had good response to NCL when added to the ETN with a high significant improvement in the SJC, TJC, DAS-28, CDAI, SDAI, and HAQ-DI compared to patients who were received placebo drug. In addition to that, 33% of patients achieved an ACR 20% response (ACR20) on NCL and ETN. Of these, 4% achieved ACR50 and another 4% achieved ACR70 response. While those group treated by placebo + ETN, 5% achieved ACR20 response and no one reached to ACR50 or ACR70 response. Twenty-seven percent of RA patients who have taken the NCL achieved moderate EULAR score while only 17% from the group that taken placebo with ETN achieved moderate response. On the other hand, no significant reduction was found in CRP, ESR, TNF-α, and IL-6, while IL-1 β reduced significantly after treatment with NCL. Treatment with NCL also exerts a significant lowering in the serum level of the E-selectin, ICAM1, and VCAM1 when compared to their value in baseline level. In RA disease, the use of NCL as adjuvant with ETN has resulted in a marked reduction in clinical assessment scoring indices and significantly decreased the E-selectin, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 with marked improvement in the quality of life of patients.     

A randomized,double‐blind,multicenter, controlled clinical trial of chicken type II collagen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Objective

To assess the efficacy and safety of chicken type II collagen (CCII) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) compared with methotrexate (MTX).

Methods

We conducted a prospective, 24‐week, followup, multicenter, double‐blind, controlled study of CCII (0.1 mg/day) versus MTX (10 mg/week) in patients with active RA. Clinical assessments were performed at screening and at 12, 18, and 24 weeks of treatment.

Results

A total of 236 RA patients were included; 211 patients (89.4%) completed the 24‐week followup. In both groups there was a decrease in pain, morning stiffness, tender joint count, swollen joint count, Health Assessment Questionnaire score, and investigator and patient assessment of function; all differences were statistically significant. In the MTX group, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C‐reactive protein level decreased. Rheumatoid factor did not change in either group. At 24 weeks, 68.57% of patients in the CCII group and 83.02% in the MTX group met the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20), and 40.95% and 57.54%, respectively, met the ACR50 criteria. The ACR20 and ACR50 response rates in the CCII group were lower than those in the MTX group, and this difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Gastrointestinal symptoms were common in both groups. There were fewer and milder side effects in the CCII group than the MTX group. The difference in incidence of adverse events between the 2 groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

CCII is effective in the treatment of RA. CCII is well tolerated, and the incidence of adverse events of CCII is lower than that of MTX.     

Adalimumab,a fully human anti–tumor necrosis factor α monoclonal antibody,for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in patients taking concomitant methotrexate: The ARMADA trial

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adalimumab (D2E7), a fully human monoclonal tumor necrosis factor α antibody, in combination with methotrexate (MTX) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite treatment with MTX.

Methods

In a 24‐week, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study, 271 patients with active RA were randomly assigned to receive injections of adalimumab (20 mg, 40 mg, or 80 mg subcutaneously) or placebo every other week while continuing to take their long‐term stable dosage of MTX. The primary efficacy end point was the American College of Rheumatology criteria for 20% improvement (ACR20) at 24 weeks.

Results

An ACR20 response at week 24 was achieved by a significantly greater proportion of patients in the 20‐mg, 40‐mg, and 80‐mg adalimumab plus MTX groups (47.8%, 67.2%, and 65.8%, respectively) than in the placebo plus MTX group (14.5%) (P < 0.001). ACR50 response rates with the 20‐mg, 40‐mg, and 80‐mg adalimumab dosages (31.9%, 55.2%, and 42.5%, respectively) were significantly greater than that with placebo (8.1%) (P = 0.003, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively). The 40‐mg and 80‐mg doses of adalimumab were associated with an ACR70 response (26.9% and 19.2%, respectively) that was statistically significantly greater than that with placebo (4.8%) (P < 0.001 and P = 0.020). Responses were rapid, with the greatest proportion of adalimumab‐treated patients achieving an ACR20 response at the first scheduled visit (week 1). Adalimumab was safe and well tolerated; comparable numbers of adalimumab‐treated patients and placebo‐treated patients reported adverse events.

Conclusion

The addition of adalimumab at a dosage of 20 mg, 40 mg, or 80 mg administered subcutaneously every other week to long‐term MTX therapy in patients with active RA provided significant, rapid, and sustained improvement in disease activity over 24 weeks compared with MTX plus placebo.

     

Clinical evaluation of tocilizumab for patients with active rheumatoid arthritis refractory to anti-TNF biologics: tocilizumab in combination with methotrexate

Abstract

We retrospectively observed the clinical efficacy and safety of tocilizumab (TCZ) in 74 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) at 13 hospitals, without any restrictions on disease duration or stage, treatment history, and other influencing factors. TCZ was infused by the approved method, and disease activity was evaluated every 4 weeks until week 24 using a joint disease activity score (DAS28). Remission and treatment response were categorised using European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) definitions. We also analysed the impact of previous treatment with other biologics and of concomitant methotrexate (MTX) therapy on the efficacy of TCZ. At week 24, the DAS28 had improved from 5.5 to 2.7 and the EULAR remission rate was 55.2%. Good and moderate responses according to the EULAR criteria were obtained in 61 and 36% of the patients, respectively. The biologic-naïve group had a significantly better DAS28 (2.1 vs. 2.8) and a significantly higher “good” response rate (86% vs. 54%) than the biologic-exposed group. Although the TCZ + MTX treatment group and the TCZ monotherapy group had a good response rate of 71 and 48%, respectively, the difference was not significant. Based on these results, we conclude that TCZ is able to significantly alleviate disease symptoms in a wide range of patients with RA in a normal clinical context.     

Prospective study of methotrexate treatment for rheumatoid arthritis treated legitimately according to the government recommended 8 mg/week dose

Abstract

Clinical squeal of the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis patients with methotrexate (MTX) according to the Japanese government recommended dose of 8 mg/week was evaluated prospectively. A total of 176 patients with active RA attending Konan Kakogawa Hospital and Kobe University Hospital were enrolled. Patients’ profile at the start of study was Class 2.0 ± 1.1 and X-ray stage 2.6 ± 1.0. The effects of MTX treatment were evaluated by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) core set, disease activity score of 28 joints (DAS28), and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria. A modified Sharp method was used to evaluate the radiographs. The improvement in the clinical signs and symptoms of the ACR core set was maintained for a 24-month period (p < 0.05). The ACR20/50/70 and DAS28 were also improved at the 12- and 24-month assessments. However, 82 of 130 patients (63.5%) were found to be nonresponders at 24 months of MTX therapy, as evaluated by EULAR response criteria. The X-ray study showed that joint destruction progressed despite the treatment. Thus, long-term MTX treatment performed in accordance with the Japanese 8 mg/week regimen appears to be favorable in terms of the signs and symptoms of RA; however, it is clearly insufficient for and cannot halt the progression of rheumatic joint destruction.     

Rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis refractory to anti–tumor necrosis factor therapy: Results of a multicenter,randomized, double‐blind,placebo‐controlled,phase III trial evaluating primary efficacy and safety at twenty‐four weeks

Objective

To determine the efficacy and safety of treatment with rituximab plus methotrexate (MTX) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had an inadequate response to anti–tumor necrosis factor (anti‐TNF) therapies and to explore the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rituximab in this population.

Methods

We evaluated primary efficacy and safety at 24 weeks in patients enrolled in the Randomized Evaluation of Long‐Term Efficacy of Rituximab in RA (REFLEX) Trial, a 2‐year, multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, phase III study of rituximab therapy. Patients with active RA and an inadequate response to 1 or more anti‐TNF agents were randomized to receive intravenous rituximab (1 course, consisting of 2 infusions of 1,000 mg each) or placebo, both with background MTX. The primary efficacy end point was a response on the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) at 24 weeks. Secondary end points were responses on the ACR50 and ACR70 improvement criteria, the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, and the European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria at 24 weeks. Additional end points included scores on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Fatigue (FACIT‐F), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Disability Index (DI), and Short Form 36 (SF‐36) instruments, as well as Genant‐modified Sharp radiographic scores at 24 weeks.

Results

Patients assigned to placebo (n = 209) and rituximab (n = 311) had active, longstanding RA. At week 24, significantly more (P < 0.0001) rituximab‐treated patients than placebo‐treated patients demonstrated ACR20 (51% versus 18%), ACR50 (27% versus 5%), and ACR70 (12% versus 1%) responses and moderate‐to‐good EULAR responses (65% versus 22%). All ACR response parameters were significantly improved in rituximab‐treated patients, who also had clinically meaningful improvements in fatigue, disability, and health‐related quality of life (demonstrated by FACIT‐F, HAQ DI, and SF‐36 scores, respectively) and showed a trend toward less progression in radiographic end points. Rituximab depleted peripheral CD20+ B cells, but the mean immunoglobulin levels (IgG, IgM, and IgA) remained within normal ranges. Most adverse events occurred with the first rituximab infusion and were of mild‐to‐moderate severity. The rate of serious infections was 5.2 per 100 patient‐years in the rituximab group and 3.7 per 100 patient‐years in the placebo group.

Conclusion

At 24 weeks, a single course of rituximab with concomitant MTX therapy provided significant and clinically meaningful improvements in disease activity in patients with active, longstanding RA who had an inadequate response to 1 or more anti‐TNF therapies.

     

Golimumab,a new human anti–tumor necrosis factor α antibody,administered intravenously in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: Forty‐eight–week efficacy and safety results of a phase III randomized,double‐blind,placebo‐controlled study

Objective

To assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous administration of golimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods

Adult patients with RA in whom disease activity was persistent despite treatment with methotrexate (MTX) at a dosage of 15–25 mg/week for ≥4 weeks were randomized to receive intravenous infusions of placebo plus MTX or intravenous infusions of golimumab at a dose of 2 mg/kg or 4 mg/kg, with or without MTX, every 12 weeks through week 48. Patients with <20% improvement in the swollen and tender joint counts could enter early escape and receive additional active treatment (week 16) or could have their dose regimen adjusted (week 24). The primary end point was the proportion of patients achieving a 50% response according to the American College of Rheumatology improvement criteria (ACR50) at week 14.

Results

The primary study end point was not met (at week 14, an ACR50 response was observed in 21% of the patients treated with golimumab plus MTX compared with 13% of the patients treated with placebo plus MTX [P = 0.051]). By week 24, significantly more patients treated with golimumab plus MTX had achieved an ACR50 response. Differences in the proportion of patients achieving an ACR50 response between the group receiving golimumab monotherapy and the group receiving placebo plus MTX were not significant at either week 14 (16% versus 13%) or week 24 (10% versus 9%). At week 48, the proportions of patients achieving ACR20 and ACR50 responses were highest among those who had received golimumab 4 mg/kg plus MTX (70% and 48%, respectively). Concomitant treatment with MTX was associated with a lower incidence of antibodies to golimumab. The most commonly reported adverse events through week 48 were infections (48% of patients treated with golimumab with or without MTX and 41% of patients receiving placebo plus MTX).

Conclusion

The primary end point was not met. However, intravenously administered golimumab plus MTX appears to have benefit in the longer‐term reduction of RA signs/symptoms in MTX‐resistant patients, with no unexpected safety concerns.

     

Comparison of combination therapies in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: leflunomide-anti-TNF-alpha versus methotrexate-anti-TNF-alpha

To compare the efficacy and safety of leflunomide (LEF)-anti-TNF-alpha combination therapy to methotrexate (MTX)-anti-TNF-alpha combination therapy in a group of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We have recruited 120 patients with RA with a high disease activity despite being treated with MTX (15 mg/week) or LEF (20 mg/die) for 3 months, without side effects. In each of these patients, therapy with either MTX or LEF was continued and randomly combined with an anti-TNF-alpha drug: etanercept, infliximab, or adalimumab. Patients were assessed at study entry and at 4, 12, and at 24 weeks. The efficacy endpoints included variations in the DAS28-ESR and the ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 responses. At each visit, any side-effect was recorded. There were no statistically significant differences in the DAS28 variations and in the ACR responses between the two groups or among the six subgroups. The number of discontinuation due to the appearance of serious side effects was higher, but not statistically significant, in the LEF-anti-TNF-alpha group than in the MTX-anti-TNF-alpha group. Other adverse events that did not necessitate the discontinuation of therapy occurred much more frequently in patients treated with MTX than in those treated with LEF. Anti-TNF-alpha drugs can be used in combination not only with MTX, but also with LEF, with the same probability of achieving significant clinical improvement in RA patients and without a significantly greater risk of serious adverse events. In contrast, it seems that combination therapy with LEF-anti-TNF-alpha is more readily tolerated than combination therapy with MTX-anti-TNF-alpha.     

A novel predictor of clinical response to methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a pilot study of in vitro T cell cytokine suppression

OBJECTIVE: Methotrexate (MTX) is an important drug for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis; however, there is variation in the clinical response. MTX inhibits T cell cytokine production, with significant interindividual variability in the dose required. We investigated if the variability in clinical response was related to variability in the in vitro assay. METHODS:Patients with disease modifying antirheumatic drug-naive, active RA [1982 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria] seen from September 2005 through January 2006 were enrolled. MTX was started at 10 mg/week and increased monthly by 2.5 mg/week. Baseline whole-blood cultures were set up with anti-CD3, anti-CD28, and increasing doses of MTX. Supernatants were harvested at 96 hours and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma), and interleukin 10 (IL-10) concentrations were estimated by ELISA. The dose of MTX (ID50) required for 50% suppression of production of cytokines and the change in Disease Activity Score-28 (DeltaDAS) at 4 months were noted. RESULTS: T cell stimulation resulted in significant increase in cytokine release, and addition of MTX led to a dose-dependent suppression of all 3 cytokines. There was significant negative correlation of DeltaDAS with ID50 values for TNF-alpha (R = -0.62, p < 0.01) and IFN-gamma (R = -0.43, p = 0.04). At 4 months, EULAR moderate and ACR 20% responses were achieved by 13 and 16 patients, respectively. EULAR moderate response could be predicted using ROC curves for TNF-alpha (sensitivity 93%, specificity 86%) and IFN-gamma (60% specificity, 71% sensitivity). ACR response was correctly predicted in 14 of 16 ACR 20% responders and in all ACR 50% and ACR 70% responders. CONCLUSION: An in vitro TNF-alpha suppression assay may help predict clinical response to MTX in RA.