Retrospective clinical study on the notable efficacy and related factors of infliximab therapy in a rheumatoid arthritis management group in Japan: one-year clinical outcomes (RECONFIRM-2)

Biologics targeting TNF have brought about a paradigm shift in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and infliximab, anti-TNF-α chimeric monoclonal antibody, was marketed in 2003 in Japan. We previously reported on the RECONFIRM study, a retrospective clinical study on the efficacy of infliximab therapy in a RA management group in Japan, where we evaluated the clinical response after 22 weeks of the therapy in 258 patients. The study reported here was aimed at reconfirming the clinical efficacy of the infliximab therapy and demographic factors related to the efficacy over a 54-week study period in 410 RA patients in the same study group. Infliximab was infused according to the domestically approved method, and the clinical response was evaluated following 54 weeks of infliximab therapy using the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria. Disease activity was assessed by DAS28-CRP (Disease Activity Score including a 28-joint count/C-reactive protein). Infliximab was discontinued in 24.4% of the 410 patients at 54 weeks and 9.3% and 8.1% discontinued the therapy due to adverse events and inefficiency, respectively. Average DAS28-CRP decreased from 5.5 at week 0 to 3.1 at week 54 after the therapy. Patients in remission and those showing low-, moderate-, and high-disease activity changed from 0.0, 1.0, 9.0 and 90.0%, respectively, at the start of the study to 27.6, 11.7, 34.4 and 26.3%, respectively, at week 54. Younger age, RF-negativity and low scores of DAS28-CRP showed significant correlations with remission at week 54. EULAR response criteria—good, moderate, and no response to infliximab—were 37.0, 41.7 and 21.2%, respectively. In conclusion, we reconfirmed the clinical efficacy of infliximab and demographic factors related to the efficacy over a 54-week study period in 410 Japanese patients with RA using DAS28-CRP and EULAR response criteria.     

Retrospective clinical study on the notable efficacy and related factors of infliximab therapy in a rheumatoid arthritis management group in Japan (RECONFIRM)

This study aims to reconfirm the clinical efficacy and related factors of infliximab therapy, the first biological agent introduced to Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Data of 351 RA patients with infliximab were collected retrospectively from three major centers for management of rheumatic diseases in Japan. Infliximab was infused according to the approved method, and the clinical response was evaluated following 22 weeks of infliximab therapy in 258 patients using the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria. DAS28-CRP (Disease Activity Score including a 28-joint count/C-reactive protein) with a threshold of 4.1 or 2.7 for the high or low disease activity cut-off was also used. A total of 90.3% of patients exhibited high disease activity before infliximab therapy. After 22 weeks of infliximab therapy, the proportions of patients exhibiting high activity, moderate activity, low activity, or in clinical remission were 27.9%, 33.3%, 10.9%, or 27.9%, respectively, thereby indicating good overall efficacy of infliximab therapy. A good or moderate overall response to therapy was achieved in 84.5% of patients. Male sex, rheumatoid factor (RF) negativity, low CRP, lower swollen joint count and a low prednisolone dose were significantly related to the clinical response. Furthermore, male sex, older age, and a high tender joint count had a significant correlation with treatment discontinuation as a result of adverse reactions. In conclusion, we have reconfirmed the effectiveness of infliximab in Japanese patients with RA by using DAS28-CRP and EULAR response criteria. These data will facilitate more efficacious use of this expensive biological agent in the daily practice of rheumatology in Japan. An erratum to this article is available at .     

Effectiveness of adalimumab for rheumatoid arthritis in patients with a history of TNF-antagonist therapy in clinical practice

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who previously discontinued tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists for any reason in clinical practice. METHODS: ReAct (Research in Active Rheumatoid Arthritis) was a large, open-label trial that enrolled adults with active RA who had previously been treated with traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs or biological response modifiers. Patients self-administered adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneously every other week for 12 weeks and were allowed to enter an optional long-term extension phase. Measures of adalimumab effectiveness included American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria, Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) and the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ DI). RESULTS: Of 6610 patients, 899 had a history of etanercept and/or infliximab therapy; these patients experienced substantial clinical benefit from adalimumab treatment. At week 12, 60% of patients had an ACR20 and 33% had an ACR50 response; 76% had a moderate and 23% had a good EULAR response. In addition, 12% achieved a DAS28 < 2.6, indicating clinical remission, and 13% achieved a HAQ DI score <0.5. The allergic adverse event rate, regardless of relationship to adalimumab, was 6.5/100-patient-years (PYs) in previously TNF-antagonist-exposed patients and 4.3/100-PYs in TNF-antagonist-naive patients. A multiple regression analysis indicated no statistically significantly increased risk of serious infections in patients who received prior TNF antagonists compared with TNF-antagonist-naive patients. CONCLUSION: In typical clinical practice, adalimumab was effective and well-tolerated in patients with RA previously treated with etanercept and/or infliximab.     

A multi-biomarker disease activity score tracks clinical response consistently in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with different anti-tumor necrosis factor therapies: A retrospective observational study

Abstract

Objectives. To assess the ability of a multi-biomarker disease activity (MBDA) score to track clinical response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with different TNF inhibitors.

Methods. The study included 147 patients who had received adalimumab, etanercept, or infliximab for a year or more, during routine clinical care at the University Hospital of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan. MBDA scores and clinical measures of disease activity were evaluated at baseline and, after 24 weeks (N = 84) and 52 weeks of treatment. Relationships between the changes (?) in MBDA score and changes in clinical measures or EULAR response categories were evaluated.

Results. The median disease activity was 5.7 by DAS28-ESR and 64 by MBDA score at baseline, and decreased significantly with treatment. ?MBDA scores over 1 year correlated with ?DAS28-ESR (r = 0.48) and ?DAS28-CRP (r = 0.46). Linear relationships between ?MBDA scores and ?DAS28-ESR or ?DAS28-CRP were not significantly different between TNF inhibitors. The MBDA scores declined significantly more in good responders (median change: –29) than moderate (–21), and more in moderate than in non-responders (+ 2), by the EULAR criteria.

Conclusions. MBDA scores tracked disease activity and treatment response in patients with RA treated with three TNF inhibitors. The relationships between ?MBDA scores and ?DAS28-ESR or ?DAS28-CRP were consistent across the three TNF inhibitor groups.     

Serum progranulin levels in Hispanic rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with TNF antagonists: a prospective,observational study

Since progranulin (PGRN) is a natural ligand of TNF receptors, we assessed whether serum PGRN levels predict and/or reflect responsiveness of RA patients to TNF-antagonist therapy. TNF-antagonist-naïve RA patients (N = 35) were started on TNF-antagonist therapy. At baseline and at follow-up visits, DAS28-ESR, DAS28-CRP, and CDAI were calculated, and venous blood was collected for serum PGRN determination. Disease activity and clinical response were based on EULAR criteria. Baseline serum PGRN levels varied considerably and correlated with ESR and CRP. DAS28-ESR, DAS28-CRP, and CDAI were greater in “PGRN-high” than in “PGRN-low”. Baseline serum PGRN levels did not predict clinical responsiveness to TNF-antagonist therapy. Nevertheless, changes in serum PGRN levels at 274+ days following initiation of TNF-antagonist therapy correlated with changes in ESR, CRP, DAS28-ESR, DAS28-CRP, and CDAI. At this time, DAS28-ESR, DAS28-CRP, and CDAI in PGRN-high and PGRN-low equalized, but serum PGRN levels remained greater in PGRN-high than in PGRN-low. To our knowledge, the present report is the first prospective study to longitudinally assess changes in serum PGRN levels following initiation of TNF-antagonist therapy. Although pre-treatment serum PGRN levels may not predict clinical responsiveness to TNF-antagonist therapy, changes in serum PGRN levels correlate with changes in disease metrics over time. By inference, administration of PGRN may represent an effective therapeutic option for development in RA patients.     

Clinical evaluation of tocilizumab for patients with active rheumatoid arthritis refractory to anti-TNF biologics: tocilizumab in combination with methotrexate

We retrospectively observed the clinical efficacy and safety of tocilizumab (TCZ) in 74 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) at 13 hospitals, without any restrictions on disease duration or stage, treatment history, and other influencing factors. TCZ was infused by the approved method, and disease activity was evaluated every 4 weeks until week 24 using a joint disease activity score (DAS28). Remission and treatment response were categorised using European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) definitions. We also analysed the impact of previous treatment with other biologics and of concomitant methotrexate (MTX) therapy on the efficacy of TCZ. At week 24, the DAS28 had improved from 5.5 to 2.7 and the EULAR remission rate was 55.2%. Good and moderate responses according to the EULAR criteria were obtained in 61 and 36% of the patients, respectively. The biologic-naïve group had a significantly better DAS28 (2.1 vs. 2.8) and a significantly higher “good” response rate (86% vs. 54%) than the biologic-exposed group. Although the TCZ + MTX treatment group and the TCZ monotherapy group had a good response rate of 71 and 48%, respectively, the difference was not significant. Based on these results, we conclude that TCZ is able to significantly alleviate disease symptoms in a wide range of patients with RA in a normal clinical context.     

Which subgroup of rheumatoid arthritis patients benefits from switching to tocilizumab versus etanercept after previous infliximab failure? A retrospective study

A retrospective study of 39 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with an inadequate response to infliximab was conducted. The responses of subjects switching from infliximab to tocilizumab (n = 23) were compared to those of subjects switching to etanercept (n = 16). Disease activity was assessed by the Disease Activity Score 28-CRP ([C-reactive protein] DAS28-CRP), the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), and the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI). Twenty-two patients completed 48 weeks of tocilizumab treatment, and 15 patients completed 48 weeks of etanercept treatment. In both treatment groups, 1 patient each discontinued treatment because of lack of efficacy. No serious adverse events occurred during the study, and no patients in either group withdrew due to adverse events. At week 48, there was a significant reduction from baseline in DAS28-CRP, SDAI, and CDAI values after switching to either tocilizumab or etanercept, and there was no significant difference in efficacy, as measured by the DAS28-CRP, SDAI, and CDAI, between the two treatment groups (p = 0.12, 0.76, and 0.86, respectively). These results suggest that safety and tolerability were similar for both treatments. A switch from infliximab to either tocilizumab or etanercept in patients with RA who have not responded to infliximab is a feasible, well-tolerated treatment option.     

Retrospective clinical study of the efficacy of lower-dose methotrexate and infliximab therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

The objective of this study is to compare the long-term outcomes of infliximab therapy with lower-dose methotrexate (MTX; ≤4 mg per week) and with standard-dose MTX (≥6 mg per week) in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. One hundred thirty-eight patients with refractory RA were treated with intravenous infliximab; 106 patients underwent lower-dose MTX therapy, and 32 patients underwent standard-dose MTX therapy. Treatment responses at 54 weeks or last observation carried forward (LOCF) assessed using the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria were compared between the two groups. Eighty-eight patients (81.1%) in the lower-dose MTX group and 27 patients (84.3%) in the standard-dose MTX therapy completed 54 weeks of infliximab treatment. A EULAR response criteria good and moderate response was seen in 70.9% in the lower-dose group and 74.1% in the standard-dose group. Good and moderate treatment responses at 54 weeks or LOCF were seen in 66.0% in the lower-dose group and 68.7% in the standard-dose group. The outcome in the lower-dose MTX group was not significantly different from that in the standard-dose group. Therapy with MTX and infliximab was effective in Japanese RA patients, regardless of MTX dosage.     

Clinical evaluation of tocilizumab for patients with active rheumatoid arthritis refractory to anti-TNF biologics: tocilizumab in combination with methotrexate

Abstract

We retrospectively observed the clinical efficacy and safety of tocilizumab (TCZ) in 74 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) at 13 hospitals, without any restrictions on disease duration or stage, treatment history, and other influencing factors. TCZ was infused by the approved method, and disease activity was evaluated every 4 weeks until week 24 using a joint disease activity score (DAS28). Remission and treatment response were categorised using European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) definitions. We also analysed the impact of previous treatment with other biologics and of concomitant methotrexate (MTX) therapy on the efficacy of TCZ. At week 24, the DAS28 had improved from 5.5 to 2.7 and the EULAR remission rate was 55.2%. Good and moderate responses according to the EULAR criteria were obtained in 61 and 36% of the patients, respectively. The biologic-naïve group had a significantly better DAS28 (2.1 vs. 2.8) and a significantly higher “good” response rate (86% vs. 54%) than the biologic-exposed group. Although the TCZ + MTX treatment group and the TCZ monotherapy group had a good response rate of 71 and 48%, respectively, the difference was not significant. Based on these results, we conclude that TCZ is able to significantly alleviate disease symptoms in a wide range of patients with RA in a normal clinical context.     

Infliximab treatment for rheumatoid arthritis, with dose titration based on the Disease Activity Score: dose adjustments are common but not always sufficient to assure sustained benefit

BACKGROUND: Randomised controlled trials have shown that treatment with anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents is effective in refractory rheumatoid arthritis (RA). OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of anti-TNF in a general unselected group of patients with refractory RA. METHODS: 68 patients with active RA despite treatment with disease modifying antirheumatic drugs were studied during 12 infliximab infusions. Infliximab (3 mg/kg/infusion) was given every 8 or 6 weeks. Clinical efficacy was assessed by the Disease Activity Score (DAS) index (44 joints). Dose adjustments were based on residual disease activity (DAS score >2.4). The primary end points were the percentage of patients achieving good or moderate response by the EULAR response criteria and the proportion of patients requiring dose adjustment. RESULTS: 20 (29%) patients discontinued treatment owing to side effects, early inefficacy, or other considerations. Among the patients who continued treatment, 27 (56%) and 32 (67%) were responders on the 6th and 12th infliximab infusion, respectively. In the same patients, disease activity gradually improved without modifications in the initial dosing in 10 (21%), whereas in 38 (79%) the dose of infliximab and/or methotrexate was increased. Intensification of treatment led to a significant decrease in the mean DAS score in this group (from 5.27 just before dose modification to 4.54 before the 12th infusion, p<0.002). The EULAR response category improved in only 10/38 (26%), however. CONCLUSIONS: In this initial observational study of patients with RA treated with recommended doses of infliximab, adjustments in treatment were common but not always sufficient to maintain adequate disease control. Longitudinal controlled trials are needed to define the optimal dose escalation in patients with suboptimal response.     

Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) using C-reactive protein underestimates disease activity and overestimates EULAR response criteria compared with DAS28 using erythrocyte sedimentation rate in a large observational cohort of rheumatoid arthritis patients in Japan

OBJECTIVES: To compare disease activity and the improvement of disease activity evaluated between by Disease Activity Score 28 using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) and by DAS28 using C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Data from 3073 RA patients registered in the large cohort database (NinJa: National Database of Rheumatic Diseases by iR-net in Japan) of 2003 was used to calculate DAS28-ESR and DAS28-CRP and disease activities were evaluated. Improvements in disease activities were also evaluated according to the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria in 1482 RA patients whose DAS28-ESR and DAS28-CRP could be calculated from data for both 2002 and 2003. RESULTS: The mean value of DAS28-CRP (3.59, SD 1.25) was significantly smaller than that of mean DAS28-ESR (4.31, SD 1.32) (p < 0.0001). The number of patients who satisfied the criteria of remission was 297 (9.7%) in DAS28-ESR versus 705 (22.9%) in DAS28-CRP and the number of patients with high disease activity was 842 (27.4%) versus 357 (11.6%) for DAS28-ESR and DAS28-CRP, respectively; there was a significant difference between the two (p < 0.0001). Change of respective DAS28 was significantly correlated (DeltaDAS28-ESR -0.05, SD 1.14 versus DeltaDAS28-CRP -0.10, SD 1.10) (p < 0.0001); however, the number of "good response" patients was significantly different (p < 0.03) between DAS28-ESR (97 patients, 6.5%) and DAS28-CRP (136 patients, 9.2%). CONCLUSIONS: DAS28-CRP significantly underestimated disease activity and overestimated the improvement in disease activity compared with DAS28-ESR. DAS28-CRP should be evaluated using different criteria from that for DAS28-ESR.     

Clinical outcome in patients with rheumatoid arthritis switched to tocilizumab after etanercept or infliximab failure

The present study retrospectively assessed the efficacy of tocilizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who failed to respond to treatment with etanercept or infliximab. A retrospective study of 33 RA patients who did not respond to etanercept or infliximab was conducted. Responses of subjects switching from etanercept to tocilizumab (n?=?17) were compared with those switching from infliximab to tocilizumab (n?=?16). Treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs before the switch, especially methotrexate (MTX), was maintained. Disease activity was assessed by the Disease Activity Score 28-C Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP), the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), and the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI). Patients who switched from etanercept were significantly less likely to have used MTX and were significantly older than patients who switched from infliximab. In both groups, there was a significant reduction from baseline in DAS28-CRP, SDAI, and CDAI values at 24 weeks with no significant differences between groups. However, at week 52, DAS28-CRP, SDAI, and CDAI values in the group switched from etanercept were significantly worse than those in the group switched from infliximab. All patients switched from infliximab were using MTX. In the evaluation between patients who switched from etanercept monotherapy, etanercept plus MTX, and infliximab plus MTX, a significant improvement from baseline was seen in DAS28-CRP, SDAI, and CDAI for all patients at 24 weeks with no significant differences between groups. Disease activity was maintained at 52 weeks in the group that switched from etanercept plus MTX and infliximab plus MTX. However, the efficacy of tocilizumab was decreased in the group that switched from etanercept monotherapy. Switching from etanercept plus MTX or from infliximab plus MTX to tocilizumab plus MTX improved response to therapy, but switching from etanercept monotherapy to tocilizumab monotherapy did not improve response to therapy.     

Do rheumatoid arthritis patients in clinical practice benefit from switching from infliximab to a second tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitor?

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of switching to a second biological drug in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. METHODS: Since 2000, Danish RA patients (n = 1021) receiving biological therapy have been registered in the nationwide DANBIO database. The first and second treatment series of patients, who switched therapy before 2005 (n = 235), were analysed for their reasons for switching, Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28), DAS28 improvement, European League against Rheumatology (EULAR) response and drug survival. Most patients switched from infliximab to etanercept or adalimumab. RESULTS: Median survivals for switchers' first/second treatment were 37/92 weeks (all patients' first treatment 119 weeks). Reasons for switching were lack of efficacy (LOE; 109 patients), adverse events (AE; 72), other reasons (54). If patients experienced AE to the first drug, 15% had AE to the second. Median DAS28 improvements in first/second treatment at 3 months were: LOE switchers 1.1/1.6; AE switchers 1.5/0.8. In LOE switchers, a good/moderate EULAR response was more prevalent during the second treatment course than during the first (63% versus 54%, p = 0.02). AE switchers achieved similar EULAR responses to both treatments (59% versus 50%, p = 0.38). CONCLUSION: LOE switchers had a better clinical response to the second treatment. AE switchers responded equally well to both treatments, with a low risk of discontinuing the second drug as a result of AE. Drug survival of the switchers' second biological therapy was higher than of the first, but lower than that of non-switchers. No difference between various sequences of drugs were found. Danish post-marketing data thus support that RA patients may benefit from switching biological therapy.     

Discontinuation of infliximab in rheumatoid arthritis patients in clinical remission

Abstract

Biologic drugs are effective but are also expensive, and it is difficult to evaluate the duration of treatment. Infliximab, an anti-TNFα antibody, suppresses arthritic activity and inhibits bone destruction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Here, we document that infliximab could be discontinued after clinical remission in RA patients. Among 172 patients with RA who reached clinical remission following infliximab (3 mg/kg) and methotrexate (MTX, >6 mg/w), nine patients with sustained remission discontinued it. Clinical assessment was based on a disease activity score (DAS) that included a 28-joint count/erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR). The disease was assessed before and after the start of infliximab treatment, and concomitant drug treatment—in the order of corticosteroid, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) other than MTX—was gradually discontinued. We considered patients for discontinuation of infliximab treatment after remission (DAS28-ESR < 2.6) had been sustained for more than 24 weeks. The nine patients able to discontinue treatment were all females, with a mean age of 53.8 years; eight patients were at stage I or II. The mean duration of disease was 28.7 months, and these patients were on corticosteroid treatment equivalent to a mean of 2.28 mg prednisolone (PSL). These nine patients all met the remission standard—that DAS28-ESR < 2.6 for ≥24 weeks) —and so their treatment with concomitant drugs was discontinued. After the discontinuation of infliximab, the mean period of sustained remission was 14.2 months and the longest period was 29 months. The duration of disease was significantly shorter and the points from Steinbrocker’s stage-classification were significantly lower in the infliximab-discontinued group than in the infliximab-continued group. Strategic reductions and/or discontinuations of concomitant treatment were performed in RA patients who attained clinical remission (DAS28 < 2.6) through treatment with infliximab and MTX. Nine patients successfully discontinued infliximab after maintaining clinical remission for more than 24 weeks. After infliximab was discontinued, clinical remission and suppression of joint destruction were maintained with MTX alone, especially in early RA patients.     

A multicenter study of leukocytapheresis in rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of leukocytapheresis (LCAP) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) that is refractory to disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), we conducted a prospective, multicenter, open-label clinical trial.METHODS:We enrolled 38 active RA patients, including 32 patients who showed an inadequate response to > or = 2 DMARDs and 6 patients with rapidly progressive RA. All patients continued drug therapy and were treated with 5 LCAP sessions conducted at 1-week intervals. The clinical response was evaluated at baseline before starting LCAP and at 4 weeks after the completion of all the LCAP sessions using the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria and the 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28) of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR).RESULTS:Of the 35 patients who fulfilled the study's eligibility criteria, 24 (69%), 10 (29%), and 23 (66%) patients achieved 20% (ACR20), 50% (ACR50), and DAS28-C-reactive protein (CRP) EULAR improvement, respectively. The mean DAS28-CRP score of the 35 patients decreased significantly from 5.99 +/- 0.92 at baseline to 4.54 +/- 1.39 after treatment. Comparison analysis of the ACR20 responders and non-responders to LCAP revealed that 22 of 24 responders (92%) concomitantly received methotrexate, whereas significantly fewer, that is, 6 of 11 non-responders (55%) received methotrexate. Less frequent and transient mild-to-moderate adverse events, including nausea and headache, were seen in 12 of 189 LCAP sessions (6.3%).CONCLUSION:These results demonstrate the usefulness of LCAP in combination with DMARDs, particularly methotrexate, as an effective and safe treatment for refractory RA.     

Efficacy and safety of switching from infliximab to adalimumab: a comparative controlled study

OBJECTIVE: To describe the efficacy and safety of adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had previously discontinued infliximab treatment. METHODS: 24 patients with RA who discontinued treatment with infliximab (switchers) were treated with adalimumab (40 mg every 2 weeks, subcutaneously) for 12 months. The results were compared with those for 25 patients with RA receiving adalimumab who had not previously used an anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitor (controls). Disease activity was measured with the 28 joint count Disease Activity Score (DAS28), and clinical response with the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% response criteria. RESULTS: At baseline there were no differences in demographic, clinical, and laboratory features between the two groups. After 12 months' adalimumab treatment, clinical improvement was similar in both groups. More specifically, ACR 20% response criteria were achieved by 18/24 (75%) switchers and by 19/25 (76%) subjects in the control group. Four switchers discontinued the study-two because of adverse events and two because of lack of efficacy, while three control patients discontinued the study-one because of lack of efficacy and two owing to side effects. CONCLUSION: Adalimumab is a well tolerated and effective treatment for patients with RA, even when infliximab has been discontinued.     

Therapy of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: outcome of infliximab failures switched to etanercept

OBJECTIVE: The role of alternative tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist therapies in the context of failure of initial TNF antagonist therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has yet to be clearly defined. The goal of this study was to determine the efficacy of etanercept in patients who failed to respond to infliximab. METHODS: Ninety-five patients with RA who failed to respond to infliximab and methotrexate were treated with etanercept (with continuation of concomitant methotrexate). Thirty-four patients never achieved a response to infliximab (primary nonresponse), 38 had an initial response to infliximab but relapsed (secondary nonresponse), and 23 demonstrated toxicity. Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28), European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response, and American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response were determined after 12 weeks of etanercept. RESULTS: After 12 weeks of etanercept, 38% of patients achieved an ACR 20% response (ACR20) on etanercept. Of these, 24% and 15% achieved ACR50 and ACR70 responses, respectively. In the primary infliximab nonresponse group, 42%, 30%, and 15% achieved ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 responses, respectively; the percentages for the secondary nonresponse group were 34%, 21%, and 14%, respectively. Significant DAS28 reductions were observed in the entire cohort and nonresponse subtype groups. Sixty-one percent of the cohort achieved either a moderate or good EULAR score (67% of primary and 56% of secondary infliximab failures). No toxicity was observed in patients who stopped infliximab due to intolerance; 19 of 23 continued etanercept after week 12. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that etanercept is effective in patients who fail to respond to infliximab and suggests a higher response in patients who have never had a response to infliximab.     

Infliximab and leflunomide combination therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: an open-label study

OBJECTIVE: To study the safety and efficacy of infliximab plus leflunomide combination therapy in adult rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Twenty patients with active RA received leflunomide 100 mg for 3 days followed by 20 mg daily for 32 weeks. At week 2 all patients started infliximab 3 mg/kg, and received a further four infusions at weeks 4, 8, 16 and 24. RESULTS: Adverse events led to 11 patients being withdrawn before the end of the study. The commonest adverse event was pruritis associated with an eczematous rash. Other serious reactions included infliximab infusion reactions in four patients and Stevens-Johnson syndrome in one. There was no relationship between the serum concentration of A77 1726, the active metabolite of leflunomide, and adverse events. The mean Disease Activity Score (DAS28) fell from 7.18 at week 0 to 5.18 (P<0.0001, paired t-test) at week 4 and remained between 3.85 and 4.85 up to week 32. In those patients remaining on treatment, more than 80% achieved an ACR20 response from week 8 to week 28, and up to 46% achieved an ACR70 response. CONCLUSION: Infliximab plus leflunomide combination therapy appears to be highly efficacious in the treatment of adult RA. However, widespread use may be limited by adverse events, which were common and in some cases severe.     

Discontinuation of infliximab in rheumatoid arthritis patients in clinical remission

Biologic drugs are effective but are also expensive, and it is difficult to evaluate the duration of treatment. Infliximab, an anti-TNFα antibody, suppresses arthritic activity and inhibits bone destruction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Here, we document that infliximab could be discontinued after clinical remission in RA patients. Among 172 patients with RA who reached clinical remission following infliximab (3 mg/kg) and methotrexate (MTX, >6 mg/w), nine patients with sustained remission discontinued it. Clinical assessment was based on a disease activity score (DAS) that included a 28-joint count/erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR). The disease was assessed before and after the start of infliximab treatment, and concomitant drug treatment—in the order of corticosteroid, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) other than MTX—was gradually discontinued. We considered patients for discontinuation of infliximab treatment after remission (DAS28-ESR < 2.6) had been sustained for more than 24 weeks. The nine patients able to discontinue treatment were all females, with a mean age of 53.8 years; eight patients were at stage I or II. The mean duration of disease was 28.7 months, and these patients were on corticosteroid treatment equivalent to a mean of 2.28 mg prednisolone (PSL). These nine patients all met the remission standard—that DAS28-ESR < 2.6 for ≥24 weeks) —and so their treatment with concomitant drugs was discontinued. After the discontinuation of infliximab, the mean period of sustained remission was 14.2 months and the longest period was 29 months. The duration of disease was significantly shorter and the points from Steinbrocker’s stage-classification were significantly lower in the infliximab-discontinued group than in the infliximab-continued group. Strategic reductions and/or discontinuations of concomitant treatment were performed in RA patients who attained clinical remission (DAS28 < 2.6) through treatment with infliximab and MTX. Nine patients successfully discontinued infliximab after maintaining clinical remission for more than 24 weeks. After infliximab was discontinued, clinical remission and suppression of joint destruction were maintained with MTX alone, especially in early RA patients.     

Analysis of efficacy and safety of multiple intravenous infusion of anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha monoclonal antibody (Remicade) combined with methotrexate compared with sodium aurothiomalate and intramuscular depot methylprednisolone in rheumatoid arthritis

The objective of the paper was compare the effects and tolerability of combined therapy of multiple intravenous infusions of anti-tumour necrosis factor-alfa (TNF-alfa) monoclonal antibody (Remicade) with methotrexate versus treatment with sodium aurothiomalate and intramuscular depot methylprednisolone in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We investigate also the interval necessary to obtain the improvement in both treatment groups. 36 patients commencing intramuscular sodium aurothiomalate therapy with intramuscular depot methylprednisolone acetate at weeks 0, 4, 8 and 12 in addition to chrysotherapy were compared in retrospective analysis with 32 patients starting with multiple intravenous infusions of infliximab, anti-TNF-alfa monoclonal antibody (Remicade) and methotrexate at a stable dose. Patients were assessed by composite clinical score (DAS 28) and C-reactive protein during 22 weeks of therapy. At week 2 and 6 a significantly greater percentage of infliximab-treated than gold-treated RA patients achieved improvement in each clinical measurement of disease activity. At 22 week of treatment moderate and good response according to EULAR criteria was achieved in 91% of infliximab-treated patients and 58% gold treated patients (p < 0.001). Adverse events were more frequently observed in infliximab-treated patients, but only gold-treated patients discontinued treatment because adverse events (2 patients due to proteinuria, 2 patients due to mucocutaneous changes and one patient due to leucopenia). The higher percentage of adverse events in infliximab-treated patients was caused mainly by the occurrence of infusion reactions (23 reactions out of 160 infusions); most of them were mild (somnolentia and headache) and transient. Viral infections (including herpes simplex and zoster) were more common in patients treated with infliximab and methotrexate. Combination therapy of infliximab and methotrexate is more effective in reducing clinical and biochemical disease activity than gold with methylprednisolone treatment in RA patients during 22 weeks of treatment, especially in the first 6 weeks.