Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty improves survival in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock

Modest survival benefits have been reported in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock who were treated with early surgical revascularization or thrombolytic therapy. To determine whether coronary angioplasty improves survival, 87 patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, from 1975 to 1985 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients in group 1 (n = 59) were treated with conventional therapy; patients in group 2 (n = 24) were treated with conventional therapy and angioplasty. Extent of coronary artery disease, infarct location, and incidence of multivessel disease were similar between groups. Hemodynamic variables including cardiac index, mean arterial pressure, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure were also similar. The 30-day survival was significantly improved for group 2 patients (50% vs. 17%, p = 0.006). Survival in group 2 patients with successful angioplasty was 77% (10 of 13 patients) versus 18% (two of 11 patients) in patients with unsuccessful angioplasty, (p = 0.006). The findings suggest that angioplasty improves survival in cardiogenic shock compared with conventional therapy with survival contingent upon successful reperfusion of the infarct-related artery.     

Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in octogenarians

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and short- and long-term outcomes of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in octogenarians. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review of clinical series. SETTING: Referral-based university medical center. PATIENTS: Consecutive series of 54 octogenarian patients (mean age, 82.4 years) who had percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty between March 1980 and December 1988. Of these patients, 91% presented with severe angina (Canadian Cardiovascular Society Class III or IV); 59% had unstable angina. Twenty-six patients (48%) had had a previous myocardial infarction and 15 (28%) had had previous coronary artery bypass surgery. Multivessel disease was present in 44 patients (81%). Follow-up ranged from 1 to 50 months (mean, 19 months). INTERVENTION: Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. MEASUREMENTS and MAIN RESULTS: The angiographic success rate was 50 of 54 (93%; 95% CI, 81% to 98%) and the clinical success rate was 49 of 54 (91%; CI, 79% to 97%). Two patients had procedure-related myocardial infarction. Two patients died in the hospital, 1 from cardiac tamponade because of pacemaker perforation and 1 from cardiogenic shock after a myocardial infarction despite successful angioplasty. During the follow-up period 4 patients required bypass surgery, 2 had myocardial infarction, and 7 died (4 deaths were cardiac). Eleven patients (20%) had re-stenosis, 7 of whom were managed with repeat angioplasty, including 1 patient who had four procedures. At follow-up, 42 of 45 survivors (93%) were asymptomatic or had class II angina. The Kaplan-Meier survival for all patients, including those who died in the hospital, was 87% at 1 year and 80% at 3 years. Cumulative freedom from major cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, or coronary bypass surgery) was 81% at 1 year and 78% at 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty can be done in octogenarians with a high rate of angiographic and clinical success, low complication rate, and a favorable long-term (3-year) outcome. As such, it is a treatment option in managing advanced coronary artery disease in this fragile group of patients.     

Primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock on admission.

AIM: To evaluate primary angioplasty results for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock on admission. POPULATION AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 11 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (defined as systolic blood pressure below 80 mmHg and signs of hypoperfusion, despite volume expanders and/or vasopressors infusion) treated with primary angioplasty. Clinical characteristics, angiographic data, hospital outcome and follow-up were analysed. RESULTS: There were ten males (90.9%) with a mean age of 66 years. Eight patients had anterior wall myocardial infarction and three patients had inferior wall myocardial infarction, two of which with extension to the right ventricle. The mean time between symptom onset and angioplasty was 3.5 hours. Three patients had left main coronary artery occlusion; three patients had single vessel disease and five patients had multivessel disease. The angiographic success rate (open infarct-related artery and TIMI III flow) was 90.9% (ten patients). Stent implantation was performed in five patients. Abciximab was given in five patients. In-hospital mortality rate was 36.4% (four patients). The surviving patients had a mean ejection fraction of 43.1% on discharge. In a mean follow-up of 16.2 months, one patient had coronary artery bypass graft and one had stroke. CONCLUSION: Based on published data, our experience with this short series of cases shows that primary angiography should be regarded as a positive option for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.     

Timing and mechanism of in-hospital and late death after primary coronary angioplasty during acute myocardial infarction

The effect of early myocardial reperfusion on patterns of death after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is unknown. Thus, the mechanism and timing of in-hospital and late deaths among a group of 614 patients treated with coronary angioplasty without antecedent thrombolytic therapy for AMI were determined. Death occurred in 49 patients (8%) before hospital discharge. Four patients died in the catheterization laboratory. Death was due to cardiogenic shock in 22 patients, acute vessel reclosure in 5 patients, was sudden in 8 patients and followed elective coronary artery bypass surgery in 8 patients. Cardiac rupture was observed in only 2 patients after failed infarct angioplasty, and did not occur among the 574 patients with successful infarct reperfusion. Intracranial hemorrhage did not occur. Multivariate predictors of in-hospital death included failed infarct angioplasty, cardiogenic shock, 3-vessel coronary artery disease and age greater than or equal to 70 years. During a follow-up period of 32 +/- 21 months (range 1 to 87), 55 patients died. The cause of death was cardiac in 36 patients, including an arrhythmic death in 23 patients and was due to circulatory failure in 13 others. One patient died of reinfarction due to late reclosure of the infarct artery. Actuarial survival curves demonstrated overall survival after hospital discharge of 95 and 87% at 1 and 4 years, respectively. Freedom from cardiac death at 1 and 4 years was 96 and 92%. Multivariate predictors of late death included 3-vessel disease, a baseline ejection fraction of less than or equal to 40%, age greater than 70 years and female gender.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Favorable early and long-term prognosis following coronary bypass surgery therapy for myocardial infarction: results of a multicenter trial. TAMI Study Group

Coronary bypass surgery was performed before hospital discharge on 82 (21%) of 386 consecutive patients enrolled in the Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (TAMI) multicenter trial of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Time from infarct symptom onset to coronary bypass surgery was 7.3 +/- 1.9 hours for 24 patients operated upon on an emergency basis and 9.3 +/- 5.2 days for 58 patients having late in-hospital surgery. There were no operative deaths and five in-hospital deaths in the surgical group, all of which occurred in patients with preoperative cardiogenic shock. Although patients in the surgical group were older (59.7 +/- 10.4 years versus 54.9 +/- 10.2 years; p = 0.03), had more extensive coronary artery disease (42% three-vessel disease versus 11%; p = 0.001), and had a higher incidence of anterior wall myocardial infarction (48% versus 39%; p = 0.02), in-hospital mortality for the surgical group (6%) was similar to that in 301 patients not undergoing surgery (7%) in this trial. For patients discharged from the hospital, mortality at 1 year was 2.5% in the surgical group and 1.8% in patients not having coronary bypass surgery before hospital discharge. At a 1 year follow-up, there were no significant differences in the frequency of cardiac or noncardiac-related hospitalizations or in event-free survival between surgical and nonsurgical groups. The majority of patients in both groups considered themselves to be in excellent or good condition. Coronary bypass surgery can be performed with low morbidity and mortality rates in close temporal association to acute myocardial infarction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Coronary artery surgery in the first 24 hours after myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND: Thrombolysis and angioplasty in the first hours after myocardial infarction minimize necrosis, leading to better early and late survival, but these therapies have limited effect in patients with three-vessel disease and cardiogenic shock. Emergency coronary surgery is an alternative treatment in some cases. AIM: To assess perioperative complications, mortality and long-term survival in patients undergoing coronary surgery within 24 h of myocardial infarction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied 57 patients undergoing surgery within 24 h of the onset of symptoms of myocardial infarction between 1982 and 1998. Multiple vessel disease was present in 31 patients (54%), shock or cardiac arrest in 19 (33%) and coronary angiography complications in 7 (12%). The mean time between onset of symptoms and surgery was 6.32 h. At the beginning of surgery 32 patients (56%) were hemodynamically stable, 15 (26%) were in shock and 10 (17%) were in cardiac arrest. RESULTS: The operative mortality was 0% for those who were hemodynamically stable at the start of surgery and 44% (11 of 25 patients) for those in shock or cardiac arrest.Shock or prior cardiac arrest were associated with higher rates of sternal infection and heart failure and longer hospital stays.Follow-up (mean 67 months) was possible for all remaining patients. The 5- and 10-year survival rates were 89 and 82%, respectively, for patients who were hemodynamically stable at the time of surgery. Five-year survival was 55%, however, for those who underwent surgery in shock or cardiac arrest. The overall rate of freedom from myocardial infarction, angioplasty or reoperation was over 95% at 5 years and over 85% at 10 years of follow-up. Age and shock or cardiac arrest were risk factors for a poor long-term outcome. CONCLUSION: The early and long-term outcome of coronary surgery within 24 h of myocardial infarction is good for patients who are hemodynamically stable when surgery begins. Shock and cardiac arrest are important risk factors for complication and death. Coronary artery bypass grafting is a good treatment option in the first hours after myocardial infarction.     

Primary angioplasty for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.

To evaluate the role of primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in cardiogenic shock, 53 patients admitted with the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock were studied. Thirty-five (66.0%) patients received intravenous thrombolytic therapy (streptokinase 15 lac units) and 18 (34.0%) underwent primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. There was no significant difference in the mean age, risk factor profile, presence of prior myocardial infarction, site of myocardial infarction and cardiac enzyme levels at presentation between the two groups. More male patients were present in the group undergoing primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (94.44% vs 68.57%; p = 0.04). The time delay between the onset of symptoms and presentation to the hospital did not differ significantly between the two groups (318.9 vs 320.0 minutes; p = NS). In the primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty group, 17 patients had a single infarct-related artery and one had both left anterior descending and right coronary artery occlusion. Thus in 18 patients, 19 vessels were attempted. Angiographic success (< 50% residual stenosis) was achieved in 15 (78.94%) vessels of which TIMI III flow was achieved in 10 (52.63%) vessels and TIMI II flow in five (26.31%). Intra-aortic balloon pump was needed in five (27.77%) patients undergoing coronary angioplasty. In-hospital mortality was 27.77 percent in patients undergoing primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and 57.14 percent in patients receiving intravenous thrombolytic therapy (p = 0.04). In the thrombolytic therapy group, mortality was higher (85.91%) in patients presenting six hours or later after the onset of symptoms as compared to those presenting in less than six hours of the onset of symptoms (50%). In primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty group, mortality was 21.42 percent in patients with successful and 50 percent in patients with failed angioplasty. Thus, in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock, an aggressive invasive strategy with primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, as compared to intravenous thrombolytic therapy, is helpful in reducing in-hospital mortality.     

Left main intervention revisited: Early and late outcome of PTCA and stenting

We reviewed our experience with 28 unselected, consecutive patients undergoing left main coronary artery (LMCA) angioplasty who had been considered unsuitable for coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). Fourteen patients (50%) had a protected LMCA circulation. Balloon angioplasty was performed in 11 patients (39.3%), and stents were implanted in 17 patients (60.7%). The procedure was elective in 22 patients (78.6%) and acute in the setting of myocardial infarction/cardiogenic shock in (21.4%). The mean follow-up duration was 15.9 ± 12 months. There were 5 early (before hospital discharge) and 4 late deaths (total 32.1%), 1 myocardial infarction (3.6%), 6 repeat angioplasties (21.4%), and 3 subsequent CABG (10.7%). All 5 early deaths occurred in patients with cardiogenic shock and unprotected circulation. The results of our study suggest that when patients have prohibitive surgical risks, elective LMCA angioplasty and/or stenting may be undertaken with a high procedural success rate. However, our data do not support intervention in the presence of acute myocardial infarction/cardiogenic shock. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Diagn. 41:21–29, 1997. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Percutaneous coronary revascularization in patients over eighty: acute and long-term results]

BACKGROUND: As a consequence of prolonged life expectancy the number of older patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease is constantly increasing. The aim of the study was to evaluate procedural success, immediate and long-term outcomes and the predictive factors of prognosis in patients aged > 80 years with high-risk coronary artery disease treated with coronary angioplasty. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we report the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies adopted in patients aged > 80 years admitted to our institution for acute coronary syndrome with or without ST-segment elevation or disabling angina (CCS class 3-4) and the immediate and long-term results of patients treated with coronary angioplasty. RESULTS: A conservative approach was adopted in 180 patients (33%, group 1) out of the total number of 545 patients, while 365 patients (67%, group 2) underwent coronary angiography. Among these, 85% underwent revascularization. Relevant comorbidities were significantly higher in group 1 (59 vs 16%, p < 0.001) while a clinical presentation with ST-elevation myocardial infarction was prevalent in group 2 (15 vs 6%, p = 0.007). The in-hospital mortality was 19% in group 1 and 7.9% in group 2 (p = 0.001). Among 198 patients treated with angioplasty, procedural success was achieved in 93% of cases, with 8% in-hospital mortality. Periprocedural myocardial infarction occurred in 3.3% and major bleeding in 5.6% of patients. At multivariate analysis ST-elevation myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock were significantly related to the in-hospital mortality. At follow-up (mean 25 +/- 13 months) 13 patients died, 9 from cardiac causes and 4 from noncardiac events. Recurrence of ischemia requiring revascularization occurred in 15.9% of cases. Cumulative survival at follow-up was respectively 86% at 1 year and 83% at 5 years, while the event-free survival at 5 years was 59% in the entire group, without any significant difference among patients with multivessel disease in whom a complete vs an incomplete revascularization was performed. The presence of severe comorbidities appeared to be the only predictive factor of unfavorable outcome at long-term follow-up at multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In patients aged > 80 years with symptomatic ischemic heart disease at high risk, the invasive approach was prevalent. Higher mortality rates were found in patients in whom coronary angiography was not performed. Comorbidities represent an important negative prognostic factor, impairing both the possibility of an invasive approach and conditioning an unfavorable outcome of revascularized patients. Coronary angioplasty can be successfully performed even in elderly patients. The in-hospital mortality turns out significantly higher in the setting of an acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction or in cardiogenic shock patients. For patients overcoming the acute phase, high survival rates can be expected at follow-up.     

One-year follow-up after recombinant tissue plasminogen activator administered to patients with acute myocardial infarction

Of 106 patients seen within 4 h of chest pain with 107 episodes of acute myocardial infarction, nine died before or during hospitalization mainly from cardiogenic shock, and four died during the next year, three were sudden deaths. The 93 survivors were reviewed at a mean of 53 (range 49-70) weeks after infarction. Of these 93, 18 had had attempted angioplasty (successful in 12) and 15 had had coronary artery bypass grafting (including one patient who had coronary artery bypass grafting performed after unsuccessful angioplasty). The remaining 61 patients continued on medical therapy only. During the one-year follow-up two patients suffered reinfarction and a further 22 had one or more cardiac admissions, mostly for chest pain. At review, 22 patients had angina (16 New York Heart Association Grade I or II) and five dyspnoea (all NYHA Grade II). Forty-three patients were taking oral nitrates, 53 were receiving calcium antagonists, 54 were using betablocking agents and 73 used anti-platelet agents. However, many of these patients continued on anti-anginal therapy prophylactically after their myocardial infarction, without continuing chest pain. Thus after recombinant tissue plasminogen activator therapy and following hospital discharge the mortality rate for patients with acute myocardial infarction was four out of 97 (4.1%) and reinfarction rate among survivors was two out of 93 (2.2%). Although the incidence of cardiac symptoms was low this may be partly due to the high incidence of angioplasty and coronary artery grafting, together with the use of anti-anginal agents.     

Multicenter registry of angioplasty therapy of cardiogenic shock: initial and long-term survival

This retrospective multicenter study reviews the role of acute percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in the treatment of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction to determine whether early reperfusion affects in-hospital and long-term survival. From 1982 to 1985, 69 patients were treated with emergency angioplasty to attempt reperfusion of the infarct-related artery. Balloon angioplasty was unsuccessful in 20 patients (group 1) and successful in 49 patients (group 2). Initial clinical and angiographic findings in the groups with unsuccessful and successful angioplasty were similar with respect to age (60.5 +/- 2.3 versus 57 +/- 1.8 years), infarct location (65% versus 65% anterior) and gender (65% versus 67% male). Hemodynamic variables in the two groups, including systolic blood pressure (68 +/- 4.3 versus 73 +/- 1.6 mm Hg), left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (24.4 +/- 2.4 versus 27 +/- 1.0 mm Hg) and initial ejection fraction (28.5 +/- 4% versus 32 +/- 2%), were also similar. Twenty-nine patients received thrombolytic therapy with streptokinase; the overall rate of reperfusion was 34%. Group 1 patients had a short-term survival rate of 20%, compared with 69% in group 2 patients (p less than 0.0005). Thirty-eight patients survived the hospital period and were followed up for 24 to 54 months (mean 32.5 +/- 2.4). Five patients (all in group 2) died during follow-up. The long-term incidence rate of congestive heart failure was 19%, arrhythmia 21%, need for repeat angioplasty 17% and coronary artery bypass grafting 26%. Twenty-four month survival was significantly better in group 2 patients (54%) versus group 1 patients (11%, p = 0.003).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Angioplasty of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery: initial success and long-term follow-up.

From 1984 to 1987, 537 consecutive patients (mean age 58 years; range 34 to 79) underwent angioplasty for proximal left anterior descending coronary artery disease. The procedure was clinically successful in 516 (96.1%). Procedural complications included myocardial infarction (2.2%; Q wave 0.9%, non-Q wave 1.3%), in-hospital bypass surgery (3%) and death (0.4%). Follow-up was obtained in 534 patients (99.8%) for a mean duration of 44 months (range 8 to 75). Follow-up cardiac catheterization, performed in 391 patients (76%), demonstrated a 39.6% angiographic restenosis rate. Ninety-eight (19%) of the patients with a clinically successful result required additional revascularization for recurrent left anterior descending artery disease by angioplasty (12.8%) or coronary artery bypass grafting (4.7%), or both (1.5%). During follow-up there was a 2.5% incidence rate of myocardial infarction (anterior myocardial infarction 1.6%), and 27 patients (5.2%) died, 14 (2.7%) of cardiac causes. The actuarial 5-year cardiac survival rate was 97%, freedom from cardiac death and myocardial infarction was 94% and freedom from cardiac death, myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass surgery and repeat left anterior descending artery angioplasty was 77%. At last follow-up 76% of patients were free of angina and 88% reported sustained functional improvement. Angioplasty is an effective treatment for proximal left anterior descending coronary artery disease that has a high success rate, low incidence of procedural complications and provides excellent long-term cardiac survival, freedom from cardiac events and sustained functional improvement.     

Direct angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. A review of outcomes in clinical subsets.

PURPOSE: To review the usefulness of angioplasty done early in the course of an acute myocardial infarction without preceding thrombolytic therapy. DATA SOURCES: The English-language literature was searched from 1983 through October 1991 using MEDLINE; bibliographies from selected articles were searched by hand. STUDY SELECTION: Series reporting results for direct angioplasty without preceding thrombolytic therapy were reviewed. Twenty-three articles describing a total of 4368 patients were found. DATA EXTRACTION: After duplicate patient series were eliminated, weighted average short- and long-term mortality rates were calculated for the remaining 2073 patients in 10 series and for selected clinical subsets. RESULTS OF DATA SYNTHESIS: Average hospital mortality for patients with acute myocardial infarction having direct angioplasty was 8.3% (95% Cl, 7.1% to 9.5%). Patients in cardiogenic shock had the highest mortality (44.2%; Cl, 35.9% to 52.5%); patients with one-vessel disease had the lowest (1%; Cl, 0% to 2.3%). For patients in cardiogenic shock, data on direct angioplasty appeared superior to data for similar patients receiving thrombolytic therapy. Although few data exist, a survival advantage was also suggested for patients with a history of previous bypass surgery (hospital mortality, 11.1% [Cl, 4.4% to 17.8%]). CONCLUSIONS: Direct angioplasty has an overall mortality similar to that of thrombolytic therapy. Patients who may benefit more from mechanical revascularization than from thrombolytic therapy include those at increased risk for thrombolytic therapy (uncontrolled hypertension, recent major surgery, cerebrovascular accident, prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation, or bleeding diathesis), and those with cardiogenic shock. The efficacy in several other patient subsets (age greater than 65 years, previous coronary artery bypass grafting, prolonged delay before reperfusion) warrants further study.     

Long-term results after acute percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock

The aim of this study was to determine the long-term outcome in unselected, consecutive patients after acute percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTCA) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock. This involved a follow-up study from a prospectively conducted patient registry in a tertiary referral center. A total of 59 patients (10 female/49 male; median age 62 years (32-91)) with percutaneous transluminal cardiac interventions in primary cardiogenic shock were identified between January 1995 and January 2000. Twenty-two patients (37%) had been resuscitated successfully before intervention. The in-hospital mortality of shock patients was 36% (n=21, median age 68 (47-84)). The median follow-up of survivors was 18.1 (7-57.3) months, during which three further patients died (8%; two because of sudden cardiac deaths, one because of acute reinfarction). Achievement of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow III after acute PTCA (84% in survivors vs. 38% in non-survivors; P<0.001) and the absence of the left main coronary artery (3% survivors vs. 29% non-survivors; P=0.003) as culprit lesion in patients with cardiogenic shock was strongly associated with an improved survival rate. A second cardiac intervention was performed in seven patients (18%). Overall functional capacity of shock survivors was good. At final follow-up, 80% of the survivors were completely asymptomatic. One patient had angina pectoris NYHA II, five patients dyspnoea NYHA class II. Exercise stress-test was performed in 24 of the 38 surviving patients, median exercise capacity was 100% (range 55-113%) of the age adjusted predicted value. In unselected patients with cardiogenic shock due to AMI, treatment with acute PTCA resulted in an in-hospital mortality of 36%, low late mortality and good functional capacity in long-term survivors. TIMI flow grade III after acute PTCA in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock was strongly associated with an improved survival rate whereas the left main coronary artery as culprit lesion was associated with worse outcome.     

Efficacy of reperfusion therapy in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock]

Efficacy of reperfusion therapy was studied in 40 patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated with cardiogenic shock. Among them, 27 were treated with intracoronary thrombolysis (ICT) and/or coronary angioplasty (Group I), and 13 were untreated by reperfusion therapy (Group II). In Group I, reperfusion was successful in 17 (Group Ia). It was unsuccessful in the other 10 (Group Ib). Patients' characteristics such as age, sex, infarct location, previous myocardial infarction, peak creatine kinase, and the extent of coronary artery disease were similar in Groups Ia and Ib. The in-hospital survival rate was significantly higher in Group Ia (76.5% vs 40.0%, p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the average hospital and CCU stays, total or maximal dosage of catecholamines (dopamine and dobutamine), and duration of IABP treatment of the discharged patients between Groups Ia and Ib. Cardiac index under pressure support (IABP, catecholamines, etc) in both Groups did not differ significantly. One patient in Group Ia had re-infarction. However, no patient in either group died during a mean follow-up period of 747 days. Among the surviving patients, 3 (23%) of Group Ia and all (100%) of Group Ib suffered from congestive heart failure. These findings suggested that reperfusion therapy improves the in-hospital survival rate in patients with cardiogenic shock. Therefore, reperfusion therapy may be recommended for cardiogenic shock secondary to acute myocardial infarction.     

Immediate angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: a community hospital's experience

This study describes prospective outcome data from 100 consecutive patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction and treated with immediate angioplasty in a community hospital setting. Successful angioplasty was achieved in 86% of patients with a mean reperfusion time of 77.5 minutes. Only 4 patients did not survive initial hospitalization; three of these initially presented with cardiogenic shock. The survival rate in noncardiogenic shock patients was 98.9%. Four patients underwent repeat angioplasty of the infarct-related artery and 6 patients were referred for coronary artery bypass surgery during initial hospitalization. During the 6 month follow-up, nine patients required repeat hospitalization. Seven of these patients presented with recurrent ischemia; four underwent repeat angioplasty and 3 coronary artery bypass surgery. There were no subsequent deaths or reinfarctions during the 6 month follow-up. The angioplasty success rate and clinical outcomes in this study compare favorably to previous trials performed in select interventional centers and suggest that immediate angioplasty can be the preferred reperfusion therapy in a community hospital setting.     

Coronary angioplasty in emergency treatment of myocardial infarction in a community-hospital setting

From July 1986 through June 1988, 135 consecutive patients with myocardial infarction, including 23 in cardiogenic shock, were treated with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in a community-hospital setting. In 109 (81%) of the cases, angioplasty was successful, resulting in brisk anterograde flow and in residual stenosis of less than 50%. The success rate was 88% (99/112) for patients not in cardiogenic shock and 43% (10/23) for those in shock. During the term of hospitalization, clinically evident total reocclusion occurred in 5 (4%) patients not in shock on presentation (2 of these experienced anterior infarction, and 3 inferior infarction); repeat angioplasty was performed successfully in all 5. No clinical reocclusion was detected in the smaller group of patients admitted in shock. Eleven patients (8%) underwent emergency coronary artery bypass grafting following the coronary angioplasty procedure: 4 for failed angioplasty in the infarct-related artery, and the other 7 for severe triple-vessel disease. Hospital mortality was 0.9% (1/112) for patients not in cardiogenic shock and 52% (12/23) for those admitted in shock, for an overall rate of 10% (13/135). Among patients whose balloon angioplasty was successful, hospital mortality was 0% for those not in shock and 30% (3/10) for those in shock. Among patients whose angioplasty failed, however, mortality was 8% (1/13) for those not in shock and 69% (9/13) for those admitted in shock.     

Usefulness of coronary angioplasty in asymptomatic patients

Of 6,545 patients who had elective coronary angioplasty procedures performed over a 7.5-year period from June 1980 through December 1987, 114 (1.7%) never had symptoms of myocardial ischemia. Exercise-induced silent myocardial ischemia was documented before angioplasty in 94% of these asymptomatic patients. Angioplasty was successful in 87%, whereas emergency coronary artery bypass grafting was required in 4%, and a further 2% had myocardial infarctions after the procedures. The remaining 7% had unsuccessful angioplasty procedures but experienced no in-hospital cardiac events. The follow-up period after hospital discharge averaged 43 +/- 20 months (range 5 to 93). There were no deaths. In the group of 99 patients with initially successful angioplasty procedures the follow-up interval ranged from 5 to 92 months. During that period, 7 patients underwent coronary bypass surgery, 4 patients had myocardial infarction and 30 patients had repeat angioplasty procedures for restenosis. The cumulative probability of event-free survival over 5 years for the group with successful angioplasty was: 100% freedom from death, 95% freedom from myocardial infarction, 87% freedom from myocardial infarction or coronary bypass surgery and 61% freedom from myocardial infarction, coronary bypass surgery or repeat angioplasty. Thus, coronary angioplasty performed in 114 asymptomatic patients, most with exercise-induced silent myocardial ischemia, achieved very good primary success and was accompanied by low cardiac event rates and no deaths over several years of patient follow-up.     

Emergency coronary surgery after transluminal angioplasty. Immediate results and long-term outcome of 100 operations]

The increasing application of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) requires evaluation of emergency coronary artery surgery for complications of this procedure. In a consecutive series of 2,576 angioplasties performed between April 1980 and January 1990, 100 patients (82 men and 18 women, average age 54 +/- 10 years, 3.9%) underwent emergency coronary artery surgery because of complications. The artery involved was the left anterior descending artery in 81% of cases. The causal lesion was a dissection and/or thrombus in 95% of cases; 85% of patients were referred for surgery with acute myocardial infarction. The average delay before surgery was 110 +/- 15 minutes (interval between coronary occlusion and starting cardiopulmonary bypass) and 155 coronary grafts were implanted (1.5 per patient). The hospital mortality was 19%; the infarction rate was 57%. The left ventricular ejection fraction decreased from 63 +/- 10% (preoperatively) to 52 +/- 9% (postoperatively), p less than 0.001. Hospital mortality was significantly related to three factors, old age, unstable angina before PTCA, and cardiogenic shock or the necessity for external cardiac massage. In the subgroup of patients developing cardiogenic shock (n = 7) or requiring external cardiac massage during transfer to the operating theatre (n = 16) the mortality was 44%. Among the 81 survivors, the global 7 year survival rate was 96% (Kaplan-Meier) with 3 cardiac deaths, 2 other patients developing myocardial infarction and 4 undergoing repeat angioplasty. After an average follow-up of 55 +/- 38 months, 80% of patients are asymptomatic, 34% have no antianginal drugs and 73% of those who were previously employed have returned to work.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: the use of coronary angioplasty and the integration of the new support devices into patient management.

Conventional therapy for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction continues to be associated with a high in-hospital mortality rate. Hemodynamic support with new mechanical devices and emergency coronary revascularization may alter the long-term prognosis for patients with this complication. Between July 1985 and March 1990, 68 patients presented to the University of Michigan with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock. Interventions performed included thrombolytic therapy (46%), intraaortic balloon pump counterpulsation (70%), cardiac catheterization (86%), coronary angioplasty (73%), emergency coronary artery bypass grafting/ventricular septal defect repair (15%), Hemopump insertion (11%), percutaneous cardiopulmonary support (4%) and ventricular assist device (3%). The 30-day survival rate was significantly better in patients who had successful angioplasty of the infarct-related artery than in patients with failed angioplasty (61% vs. 7%, p = 0.002) or no attempt at angioplasty (61% vs. 14%, p = 0.003). This difference was maintained over the 1-year follow-up period. The only clinical variable that predicted survival was age less than 65 years. The early use of the new support devices in 10 patients was associated with death in 8 (80%), but this poor outcome may reflect a selection bias for an especially high risk population. Collectively, these recent data continue to suggest that emergency revascularization with angioplasty may reduce the mortality rate, but further study is required to define optimal utilization and integration of new support devices.