Similar outcomes between two-stage revisions for infection and aseptic hip revisions

Purpose

Two-stage revision hip arthroplasty using an antibiotic-loaded spacer is the most widely performed procedure for infected hip arthroplasties. The clinical outcome of this type of surgery compared with aseptic joint revision with exchange of femoral and acetabular components is still controversial due to the relative lack of medium- to long-term follow-up. Therefore, we analysed clinical and radiological outcomes of septic two-stage revisions compared with aseptic hip revision surgeries.

Methods

In this retrospective study we assessed 82 consecutive patients who underwent two-stage revision for septic total hip (45 patients) or one-stage aseptic revision arthroplasty (37 patients). The average follow-up was 53 months for the aseptic group and 55 months for the septic group. For clinical evaluation, we used the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the Merle d’Aubigné and Postel score. The postoperative pain level was determined with the visual analogue pain scale.

Results

The surgeries were performed 124 months (aseptic group) and 119 months (septic group) after primary total hip arthroplasty on average. The main indications for aseptic revision surgeries were aseptic loosening (96 %), dislocation (2.2 %), and periprosthetic fracture (2.2 %). In the clinical outcome patients achieved 75.5 points in the aseptic group and 73.4 points in the septic group in the Harris Hip Score. The Merle d’Aubigné and Postel Score revealed 12.5 points for the aseptic group and 13.1 points for the septic group. Mean level of persisting pain was 0.8 (aseptic group) and 0.4 (septic group) on the visual analogue scale (VAS). Overall survival in the aseptic group was 85.6 % at 9.8 years 82.7 % at 10.1 years for the septic group, with a repeat revision rate of 8.1 % and 6.7 %, respectively.

Conclusions

Performing aseptic acetabular and femoral revision hip arthroplasty showed equal clinical outcomes in relation to septic two-stage revision hip surgeries. Our results showed a tendency for better outcome in comparison with the information given in the literature for septic and nonseptic exchange arthroplasties, including a lower rate of re-revisions.

     

Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein: A valuable biomarker in the differentiation between periprosthetic joint infection and aseptic loosening?

Purpose

The pre-operative differentiation between periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and aseptic loosening after total hip (THA) or knee (TKA) arthroplasty is essential for successful therapy and relies in part on the use of molecular markers. The objective of this study was to assess serum levels of lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) as a diagnostic tool for PJI and to compare its accuracy with standard tests.

Methods

One hundred and twenty patients presenting with a painful TKA or TKA with indication for surgical revision were included in this prospective, controlled, clinical trial at a single centre. Pre-operative blood and serum samples were collected and analysed for white blood cell (WBC) count, C-reactive protein (CRP) and LBP. The definite diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection was determined on the basis of clinical, microbiological and histopathological examination.

Results

LBP showed significantly higher values in PJI compared with aseptic loosening (p?p?7 ng/ml. In combination with CRP, the positive predictive value for PJI was at 0.67; negative predictive value with both negative was at 0.77.

Discussion

Patients with PJI have elevated serum levels of LBP when compared with patients with aseptic loosening. The use of LBP in serum appears not to be a more accurate marker than CRP level in serum for detecting PJI. On the basis of these results, we cannot recommend the sole use of LBP for differentiating PJI and aseptic loosening following THA and TKA.     

Impaction bone grafting and a cemented cup after acetabular fracture

Purpose

Patients suffering from post traumatic osteoarthritis of the acetabulum often require a total hip arthroplasty at a relatively young age. Long-term data outcome studies for this population are lacking. We report on the long-term outcome of 20 acetabular fractures in 20 patients treated with impaction bone grafting and a cemented cup after a mean follow-up of 18 years (range, 12–26 years).

Methods

The group consisted of 14 males (70 %) and six females (30 %) with an average age of 53.3 years (range, 35–75 years) at time of surgery. No patients were lost to follow-up. Four patients died and three patients underwent a revision; at review 13 patients were still living with their implant in situ. Survivorship analysis was performed at 20 years follow-up for three endpoints.

Results

Survival rate with endpoint revision for any reason at 20 years postoperative was 74.7 % (95 % confidence interval (CI), 40–91 %), 80.0 % (95 % CI, 41–95 %) for endpoint aseptic loosening, and 63.9 % (95 % CI 32–84 %) for endpoint radiographic failure. Three acetabular components were revised at 14.5, 15.3, and 16.7 years postoperative. Two cups failed for aseptic loosening and one cup failed due to septic loosening. The average postoperative Harris hip score was 82 (range, 56–100).

Conclusion

Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone grafting and the use of a cemented cup after acetabular fracture is an attractive technique with acceptable long-term results and a low complication and re-operation rate.     

The effects of femoral component design on the patello-femoral joint in a PS total knee arthroplasty

Introduction

Anterior knee pain following TKA performed utilizing the PFC Sigma system still represents a cause of failure. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether or not a recent change in the femoral design (PFC Sigma PS) had a positive impact on the patello-femoral complication rate.

Materials and methods

A consecutive series of 100 TKA using the PFC Sigma PS system was followed prospectively for a minimum of 3 years. All patellae were replaced and a standard lateral release was never performed. Radiographic analysis following the Knee Society Score (KSS) included antero-posterior weight-bearing, lateral and bilateral axial radiographs. TKA rotational alignment was recorded at the final follow-up in 30 consecutive knees by performing a CT evaluation.

Results

Good to excellent clinical results according to the KSS were achieved in 94 % of the knees. Survival without need of reoperation for any reason was 98 % at 3 years minimum follow-up; two reoperations were done for removal of fibromatous intra-articular tissue (“Clunk syndrome”). There were no revisions for septic or aseptic loosening of the components. The mean ROM improved from 104° preoperatively to 115° (97°–132°) postoperatively: postoperative flexion was 120° or more in 58 % of the knees. Severe anterior knee pain was present in 9 % of patients. Radiographic evaluation showed 90 knees with a tibio-femoral anatomical axis between 8° and 2° of valgus (±3° from the intraoperative goal). CT evaluation of 30 consecutive knees showed that the femoral component positioning in relationship to the trans-epicondylar axis had only 2.80° of external rotation (±2.10°) with respect to a planned external rotation of 3°. This difference was statistically significant.

Conclusions

Although the PFC Sigma PS system provides good and predictable results for tricompartmental arthritis of the knee, anterior mechanism complications still represent a reason for dissatisfaction in a substantial group of patients.     

Are the Outcomes of Revision Knee Arthroplasty for Flexion Instability the Same as for Other Major Failure Mechanisms?

Background

Aseptic loosening, infection, and flexion instability have emerged as the leading etiologies for revision after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Although studies have reported improved outcomes after revision TKA, the relative functional and clinical outcomes of patients revised for flexion instability and other failure etiologies have not been extensively reported. The aim of the study was to compare the functional and patient-reported outcomes of revision TKA for the common failure etiologies.

Minimum ten-year results of a 28-mm metal-on-metal bearing in cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients fifty years of age and younger

Purpose

Concerns have been raised in relation to metal-on-metal (MoM) articulations with catastrophic soft-tissue reactions due to metal debris. We reviewed how small head MoM articulations perform in primary uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) in young patients at a minimum of ten years.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated the clinical and radiographic results of the first 100 consecutive primary cementless THAs using the 28-mm Metasul MoM articulation in 91 patients younger than 50 years of age at the time of surgery.

Results

After 13 years, survival for the endpoint revision due to any reason was 90.9 % and 98.9 % for revision due to aseptic implant loosening. The cumulative incidence of MoM related revisions was 1.2 %. Small proximal femoral osteolysis was found in 18 % of hips. No acetabular osteolysis or loosening was detected. Two hips showed signs of femoral neck impingement with severe damage to the neck.

Conclusions

Early in the second decade, MoM-associated complications were rare using the 28-mm Metasul articulation, and aseptic loosening was not a major mode of failure in this cohort of young patients.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic Level IV.     

The aetiology of total knee arthroplasty failure influences the improvement in knee function

Background

Some indications for revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA), e.g. arthrofibrosis, have been identified to yield inferior results. The aim of this study was to analyse the results of revision TKA according to aetiology of TKA failure.

Patients and methods

The results of 97 consecutive revision TKA in 97 patients stratified according to the aetiology of primary TKA failure (periprosthetic infection, aseptic loosening, instability and arthrofibrosis), were compared using the Knee Society Score (KSS). The effect of patient age, gender, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, interval to revision and the occurrence of complications on the outcome were also analysed.

Results

After a mean follow-up of 29 months, the KSS had significantly improved in all patient groups (p < 0.001). The analysis of variance among patient groups depicted no significant differences between preoperative KSS (p = 0.618) and postoperative KSS (p = 0.915), while the magnitude of pre- to postoperative improvement showed significant differences between the groups (p = 0.006). The aetiology of primary TKA failure had an independent influence on pre- to postoperative improvement (p = 0.014). Of the other factors analysed, only the ASA classification had an independent impact on postoperative KSS (p = 0.045).

Conclusion

The aetiology of TKA failure has an effect on the improvement in knee function from revision TKA. As no difference was observed between patient groups postoperatively, similar clinical results can be expected independent of the aetiology of primary TKA failure.     

Reconstruction of the rotation center of the hip after oblong cups in revision total hip arthroplasty

Background

The preoperative bone defect and the reconstruction of the center of rotation of the hip are critical in acetabular revision surgery. Uncemented oblong cups are employed in order to manage these issues. We analyzed the clinical results and rates of revision of two different uncemented oblong cups, the reconstruction of the center of rotation of the hip, as well as the rate of radiological loosening and possible risk factors.

Materials and methods

Forty-five patients (46 hips) underwent acetabular revision surgery using two different uncemented oblong cups. We assessed the clinical results and the survival rate for revision and aseptic loosening. Intraoperative bone loss was classified according to Paprosky, and acetabular reconstruction was assessed according to Ranawat. The mean follow-up was 7.2 years (range 4–11 years).

Results

There were four re-revisions (three due to aseptic loosening); the survival rate for re-revision due to aseptic loosening was 60.1 % at seven years. The mean distance between the center of the femoral head prosthesis and the approximate center of the femoral head improved from 21.5 to 10.2 mm. Thirteen cups showed radiological loosening; the survival rate for radiological loosening at seven years was 40.54 %. A smaller postoperative horizontal distance was correlated with cup loosening.

Conclusions

Although optimal acetabular reconstruction can be achieved by using oblong uncemented cups in revision hip surgery, the clinical and radiological results are not encouraging. Excessive medialization of the cup may increase the rate of loosening.     

Periprosthetic Joint Infection Is the Main Cause of Failure for Modern Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 11,134 Knees

Background

Although large series from national joint registries may accurately reflect indications for revision TKAs, they may lack the granularity to detect the true incidence and relative importance of such indications, especially periprosthetic joint infections (PJI).

Questions/purposes

Using a combination of individual chart review supplemented with New Zealand Joint Registry data, we asked: (1) What is the cumulative incidence of revision TKA? (2) What are the common indications for revising a contemporary primary TKA? (3) Do revision TKA indications differ at various followup times after primary TKA?

Methods

We identified 11,134 primary TKAs performed between 2000 and 2015 in three tertiary referral hospitals. The New Zealand Joint Registry and individual patient chart review were used to identify 357 patients undergoing subsequent revision surgery or any reoperation for PJI. All clinical records, radiographs, and laboratory results were reviewed to identify the primary revision reason. The cumulative incidence of each revision reason was calculated using a competing risk estimator.

Results

The cumulative incidence for revision TKA at 15 years followup was 6.1% (95% CI, 5.1%–7.1%). The two most-common revision reasons at 15 years followup were PJI followed by aseptic loosening. The risk of revision or reoperation for PJI was 2.0% (95% CI, 1.7%–2.3%) and aseptic loosening was 1.2% (95% CI, 0.7%–1.6%). Approximately half of the revision TKAs secondary to PJI occurred within 2 years of the index TKA (95% CI, 0.8%–1.2%), whereas half of the revision TKAs secondary to aseptic loosening occurred 8 years after the index TKA (95% CI, 0.4%–0.7%).

Conclusions

In this large cohort of patients with comprehensive followup of revision procedures, PJI was the dominant reason for failure during the first 15 years after primary TKA. Aseptic loosening became more important with longer followup. Efforts to improve outcome after primary TKA should focus on these areas, particularly prevention of PJI.

Level of Evidence

Level III, therapeutic study.

     

Uncemented vs Cemented Cruciate Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With Body Mass Index Greater Than 30

Background

Aseptic loosening of cemented and uncemented tibial components continues to be a source of implant failure after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the obese population. There is limited literature reviewing uncemented cruciate retaining (CR) components in the obese population.

Long-term survival and radiological results of the Duracon™ total knee arthroplasty

Purpose

The aim of this study was to analyse the long-term (>ten years) survival rate and radiological results of the Duracon TKA.

Methods

Between 1992 and 1999 159 Duracon TKA were implanted at our institution. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for the endpoints exchange, addition or removal of any component for any reason, revision due to aseptic loosening and mechanical failure was performed. Radiological long-term (>ten years) follow-up (FU) analysis was performed according to the Knee Society Radiographic Evaluation and Scoring System.

Results

Mean age at surgery was 74.3 years, 28 % were male, and 89 % had primary osteoarthritis as diagnosis. Mean FU for survival analysis was 10.9 years (SD 4.2). A total of 58 % of the patients died during follow-up. Three patients (2.1 %) were lost to follow-up and five TKA (3.1 %) were revised. After ten years the mean survival was 97.7 %, 99.4 % and 98.3 % for the aforementioned endpoints, respectively. Mean radiological FU was 11.8 years (SD 2.3). We found no significant change in alignment of the components or axis over time. Progressive radiolucencies were found in nine TKA (17 %), mainly around the tibial component (95 %).

Conclusion

The Duracon TKA showed excellent long-term survival comparable to data from national registers and to other successful designs. Radiological changes found on plain radiographs were scarce after almost 12 years of radiological follow-up indicating good implant stability.     

Cementless vs Cemented Tibial Fixation in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background

The ideal fixation for modern tibial components in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial with uncertainty on whether cementless implants can yield equivalent outcomes to cemented fixation in early follow-up.