Blunt traumatic aortic transection: the endovascular experience

BACKGROUND: Thoracic aortic transection resulting from blunt trauma is usually fatal. It is almost always associated with multiple, complex, nonaortic injuries that could be adversely affected by standard surgical repair of the aorta. Endovascular stenting techniques offer these patients a less physiologically disruptive treatment option. We studied the feasibility and safety of endovascular stent graft placement for treatment of acute traumatic aortic transection. METHODS: Between 1994 and 2001, 9 patients were treated emergently for aortic transections with stent graft placement. The first patient had a custom-made prototype, and the other 8 patients had the Cook-Zenith thoracic stent graft implanted. All were polyester-covered Z-stent construction and deployed through a femoral 20- to 24-F delivery sheath. RESULTS: Stent graft placement successfully sealed the aorta in all patients. One patient died as a result of a cerebrovascular accident. One patient required a brachial thrombectomy to relieve arm ischemia. The remaining eight patients were alive and without complications during the follow-up period (mean 21 months). CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular repair for acute aortic transection is a safe, effective, and timely treatment option. It may be the treatment of choice in patients with extensive associated injuries.     

Endovascular repair of a distal thoracic aortic transection in association with traumatic burst fracture

We present an endovascular repair of aortic transection at distal thoracic level due to traumatic burst fracture. The association of blunt aortic transections and thoracic burst fractures is very rare. Contemporary preferred treatment approach is endovascular aortic repair, because of low mortality rates. The aortic repair procedure should be performed before spinal stabilization surgery. In this case report, we present a 49-year-old male patient with blunt traumatic descending thoracic aortic transection, treated by endovascular aortic repair. In conclusion, the emergent endovascular repair is a preferable method to treat the traumatic distal thoracic aortic transection.     

Timing of endovascular repair of blunt traumatic thoracic aortic transections

BACKGROUND: Patients with blunt traumatic thoracic aortic transection (BTTAT) just distal to the takeoff of the left subclavian artery typically have concomitant injuries that make open emergent surgical repair highly risky. Over the past decade, endovascular repair of the injured thoracic aorta with commercially available and custom-made covered stents has developed as a viable option, with reported decreases in short-term morbidity and mortality. If active extravasation of contrast from the injured thoracic aorta is not appreciated on chest computed tomography scan, other concurrent injuries of the head, abdomen, and extremities can often be repaired with careful control of blood pressure. The timing of endovascular repair of the traumatic thoracic aortic transection, however, often comes into question, particularly with the presence of fever, pneumonia, or bacteremia. We sought to identify a time frame during which endovascular repair of BTTAT could safely be performed. METHODS: Age, concomitant injuries, time from trauma to repair, type of device, and major outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: Over a 5-year period (January 2000 to March 2005), 51 patients presented with BTTAT. Twenty-seven (52.9%) patients with BTTAT died shortly after arrival. Of the remaining 24, 9 underwent emergent open repair, with 1 intraoperative death. Two delayed open repairs were performed. Thirteen patients with BTTAT underwent delayed endovascular repair. Successful endovascular repair of BTTAT was performed in all 13 patients, with no intraoperative deaths. Seven patients were treated with commercial devices and six with custom-made covered stents. None of the repairs was performed emergently. The timing of repair ranged from 1 day to 7 months (median, 6 days), and all patients were treated aggressively with beta-blockade before surgery. One patient was discharged from the hospital and underwent elective repair at a later date. Three patients died in the postoperative period (30 days): two from multisystem organ failure and one from iliac artery complications encountered at the time of device deployment. The remaining 10 patients were successfully discharged to a rehabilitation facility. CONCLUSIONS: The opportunity to successfully perform endovascular repair of BTTAT may be possible many days after the initial injury in the hemodynamically stable trauma patient.     

The midterm results of stent graft treatment of thoracic aortic injuries

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Several publications document the technical feasibility of stent graft repair of aortic transection. We report our mid-term results of endovascular repair of thoracic aortic transections using covered stent grafts and compare this to a cohort undergoing open repair during the same time period to demonstrate the shift in practice pattern at our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who sustained blunt thoracic transection was undertaken. Medical records were examined to identify the clinical outcome of the procedure, and follow-up CT scans were reviewed to document adequate treatment of the transection. Outcome measures include procedure-related mortality, neurological morbidity, and successful immediate and mid-term coverage of the thoracic false aneurysm and absence of graft migration or endoleak. RESULTS: From July, 2000 to October, 2004, 27 patients were identified with descending thoracic aortic transection at our level I trauma center. Fourteen patients were managed nonoperatively, five patients underwent thoracotomy and direct aortic repair, and eight patients underwent endoluminal stent graft repair. Of the endovascular group (n=8), repairs were performed with stacked AneuRx aortic cuffs (Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN) (n = 6), a Gore thoracic aortic stent graft (Thoracic EXCLUDER; W.L. Gore, Flagstaff, AZ) (n=1), or a Medtronic Talent thoracic endograft (Medtronic, Inc.) (n=1). Access for stent graft deployment was the common femoral artery (n=2), iliac artery (n=4), or distal abdominal aorta (n=2). Completion arch aortography and postoperative CT scanning confirmed successful management of the aortic transection in each patient. There were no procedure-related deaths, paraplegia, or stroke. Postoperative complications included a brachial artery thrombosis in one patient as well as an external iliac artery dissection and acute renal failure in a second patient for a complication rate of 37.5%. Two patients died as a result of their injuries unrelated to the stent graft repair. Mean follow-up of 16.6 mo has shown no evidence of endoleak or stent graft migration. Of the open repair group (n=5), one patient died in the operating room during attempted aortic repair, and one patient had a postoperative stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Due to technical success and absence of delayed complications including endoleak and graft migration, stent graft repair of traumatic aortic transection has replaced open aortic repair as the primary treatment modality in the multiply injured trauma patient at our institution. The postoperative complication rate observed in this small series tempers the success to some degree, but the severity of the complications compares favorably with those observed in the open repair group.     

Endovascular management of traumatic ruptures of the thoracic aorta: a retrospective multicenter analysis of 28 cases in The Netherlands

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive endovascular treatment of a traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta is a new strategy in the care of multitrauma patients. We report the experience in The Netherlands with endovascular management of patients with acute traumatic ruptures of the thoracic aorta. METHODS: We reviewed 28 patients with a traumatic thoracic aortic rupture treated with a thoracic aortic endograft between June 2000 and April 2004. All patients underwent treatment at one of the four participating level 1 trauma centers. Data collected included age, sex, injury severity score, type of endovascular graft, endovascular operation time, length of stay, length of stay in the intensive care unit, and mortality. Follow-up data consisted of computed tomographic angiography and plain chest radiographs at regular intervals. RESULTS: All patients (mean age, 40.9 years; SD, 18.5 years) experienced severe traumatic injury, and the mean injury severity score was 37.1 (SD, 7.8). All endovascular procedures were technically successful, and the median operating time for the endovascular procedure was 58 minutes (interquartile range, 47-88 minutes). The overall hospital mortality was 14.3% (n = 4), and all deaths were unrelated to the aortic rupture or stent placement. There was no intervention-related mortality during a median follow-up of 26.5 months (interquartile range, 10-34.6 months). Postoperative data showed no severe endovascular graft- or procedure-related morbidity, except for one patient with an asymptomatic collapse of the endovascular graft during regular follow-up. This was corrected by placing a second graft. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the results of immediate endovascular repair of a traumatic aortic rupture are at least equal to those of conventional open surgical repair. Especially in these multitrauma patients with traumatic ruptures of the thoracic aorta, endovascular therapy seems to be preferable to conventional open surgical repair.     

Endovascular management of acute blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury: a single center experience

BACKGROUND: Traumatic injury of the thoracic aorta is a life-threatening complication in patients who sustain deceleration or crush injuries. The magnitude of force necessary to cause blunt thoracic aortic injury results in a high proportion of concomitant injuries, posing a significant challenge for prioritizing management. Open surgical mortality is increased in the presence of coexisting head, lung, and abdominal injuries. Spinal cord ischemia may occur following aortic cross-clamping and operative hypotension. Endovascular stent-graft placement offers a safe, effective, and timely treatment option. The aim of this study was to assess our single center experience of endovascular repair following acute blunt traumatic aortic injury. METHODS: Data from thirteen consecutive patients (mean age, 43.2 years; range, 16 to 84 years) with acute blunt traumatic aortic injury treated by endovascular stent-graft insertion between October 2001 and March 2007 was prospectively collected. Demographics, injury characteristics, technique, and complications were recorded. Follow-up data consisted of computed tomographic angiography and plain chest radiography at regular intervals. Mean and median follow-up after stent-graft implantation were 28.9 and 29 months, respectively. RESULTS: All patients underwent endovascular repair within a median of 9 hours from hospital presentation. Two patients underwent carotico-carotid bypass immediately prior to endovascular stenting during a single anesthetic. Stent-graft implantation was technically successful in all patients. No patient required conversion to open surgical repair of the acute blunt traumatic aortic injury. Procedure-related paraplegia was zero. Complications included proximal migration of initial stent-graft in one patient and iliac artery avulsion in another patient with consequent ilio-femoral bypass. The median hospital stay was 17 days. There were no in-hospital deaths. CONCLUSION: Endovascular repair is evolving as the procedure of choice for acute blunt traumatic aortic injury. Treatment of lesions that extend into the aortic arch is feasible with extra-anatomical bypass. In our study, endovascular repair of blunt traumatic aortic injury is a safe procedure with low morbidity and a mortality rate of zero.     

Endograft stenting in the adolescent population for traumatic aortic injuries

Traumatic thoracic aortic transections are uncommon in the pediatric population. These injuries are currently treated by open operative repair via thoracotomies. We present 2 adolescent patients with traumatic thoracic aortic transections who were repaired by endovascular techniques. Both adolescents, aged 16 and 17 years, were in high-speed motor vehicle collisions and presented with multisystem trauma. Patient 1 had a transection of the descending aorta and was repaired with two 23-mm (diameter), 3-cm-long endograft cuffs at 48 hours after injury because of her multiple organ injuries. She was hospitalized for 40 days. Patient 2 had a thoracic aortic transection just distal to the aortic arch. He was repaired within 12 hours of injury with a 24-mm and two 22-mm AneuRx endograft cuffs. He was hospitalized for 8 days. Both patients have recovered without complications at 13 and 21 months, respectively. Endovascular stenting, especially in critically ill patients, allows for definitive treatment of the vascular injury without the need for bypass and reduces the recovery time that is associated with thoracotomies. Short-term recovery and follow-up are encouraging for endovascular stenting in the adolescent population; however, further long-term follow-up is required.     

The role of CT angiography in the diagnosis of blunt traumatic thoracic aortic disruption and unsuspected carotid artery injury

We have replaced aortography and open thoracic surgery to diagnose and treat blunt traumatic thoracic aortic disruption (TTAD) in favor of CT angiography (CTA) and endovascular repair. The purpose of this study is to review our experience with the management and outcomes of TTAD and associated carotid artery injuries. In January 2003, we initiated a protocol that used CTA to evaluate all patients with suspected TTAD from blunt trauma. When TTAD was diagnosed, patients were managed by endovascular repair using abdominal aortic extension cuffs. Twenty-nine patients with TTAD were managed by endovascular repair. In all patients, abdominal endograft extension cuffs successfully excluded the traumatic disruptions. Six (21%) of these patients had concomitant, unsuspected carotid artery injury diagnosed by CTA. One patient had bilateral carotid artery dissections, sustained irreversible brain injury, and died. Four patients with common carotid dissections were successfully treated by anticoagulation and made uneventful recoveries. One patient with a common carotid-innominate artery dissection and pseudoaneurysm underwent endovascular repair. This study indicates that CTA and endovascular repair provide accurate diagnostic and therapeutic results in the management of blunt TTAD. Furthermore, CTA should include arch and cervical views to detect an unsuspected, concomitant carotid artery injury.     

Endovascular repair of traumatic descending thoracic aortic disruptions: should endovascular therapy become the gold standard?

Acute arterial disruptions of the thoracic aorta are rare and often lethal. They are most often due to blunt trauma and occur most commonly just distal to the left subclavian artery origin in the setting of multisystem injuries. The very proximal nature of the lesion in survivors makes open surgical repair hazardous, with mortality rates reaching over 20%. Endovascular therapy is a new and attractive option for the treatment of those challenging patients. Since March 2002, 3 patients with blunt and 1 patient with a stable iatrogenic descending aortic injury were successfully treated at this institution. Spiral computed tomography followed by angiography was used for diagnosis. No preexisting aortic pathology was present. Major associated injuries included unstable thoracic spinal fractures, abdominal solid organ injuries, and hip fractures, making the subjects poor surgical candidates. The Talent Endovascular Graft was deployed via open femoral or iliac artery access under fluoroscopic guidance. All 4 patients underwent successful exclusion of their thoracic pseudoaneurysm with use of the Talent endovascular graft. One patient required partial coverage of the left subclavian artery, and a second patient had an iliac artery stent deployed after traversal of an area of stenosis with the delivery system. There were no cardiac, neurologic, pulmonary, or peripheral vascular complications. Acute aortic disruption, with its associated high surgical morbidity and mortality, is an excellent indication for endovascular therapy to improve patient outcomes. More long-term data are needed on repair durability.     

Blunt traumatic aortic transection: endoluminal repair with commercially available aortic cuffs

Blunt traumatic aortic transection remains a lethal condition. Treatment requires a high index of suspicion, prompt diagnosis, and expedient operative repair. Even in the best of circumstances, morbidity and mortality associated with open surgical repair are high, particularly because of frequent occurrence of other severe associated injuries. Endoluminal aortic stent-graft repair is an accepted treatment option in patients with aneurysm degeneration, and may be an alternative means of managing contained aortic transection. We describe three cases of blunt traumatic thoracic aortic transection treated with commercially available aortic endoluminal stent grafts.     

Outcomes of surgical and endovascular treatment of acute traumatic thoracic aortic injury

BACKGROUND: Acute thoracic aortic injury resulting from blunt trauma is a life-threatening condition. Endovascular therapy is a less invasive treatment modality that may potentially improve patient outcomes. We reviewed our experience with patients who sustained blunt thoracic aortic injuries distal to the left subclavian artery and presented for open surgical or endovascular repair. METHODS: Between August 1993 and August 2006, 62 patients sustained blunt thoracic aortic injuries distal to the origin of the left subclavian artery and proceeded to undergo open surgical (n = 48, 77%), or endovascular repair (n = 14, 23%). Revised trauma score (RTS), injury severity score (ISS), new injury severity score (NISS), individual associated traumatic injuries, as well as operative and postoperative outcomes were compared between open surgical and endovascular groups. RESULTS: Age, gender, race, and mechanism of injury did not differ between open surgical and endovascular groups. Additionally, RTS, ISS, and NISS values were not significantly different. The proportion of patients with sternal fractures (14% vs 0%), or unstable spinal fractures (36% vs 10%) was significantly greater in the endovascular group. Of the patients who received endografts, 93% (n = 13) were evaluated by a cardiothoracic surgeon and assessed to be prohibitive to operative intervention. Endografts utilized included commercially manufactured thoracic endografts (n = 6; 43%) and abdominal aortic endograft components (n = 8; 57%). Forty-one interposition grafts were placed in the open surgical group. Renal complications (32% vs 7%), and urinary tract infections (35% vs 7%) approached significance between surgical and endovascular groups (P = .082 and P = .077, respectively). Intraoperative mortality for the surgical and endovascular groups was 23% and 0%, respectively (P = .056). Endovascular repair was associated with significant reductions in operative time (118 vs 209 minutes), estimated blood loss (77 vs 3180 ml), and intraoperative blood transfusions (0.9 vs 6.1 units). No endoleaks were detected during a mean follow-up of 9.4 months in the endovascular group. CONCLUSION: Endovascular repair of blunt descending thoracic aortic injuries utilizing thoracic or abdominal endographs is a technically feasible modality that is at least equivalent to open therapy in the short term and associated with a lower intraoperative mortality (P = .056). Endovascular therapy has advantages in operative time, operative blood loss, and intraoperative blood transfusions.     

Traumatische thorakale Aortenruptur

Traumatic aortic rupture is a life-threatening injury which is frequently associated with blunt thoracic trauma or found coincidentally in heavily traumatized patients. Depending on the degree of disruption of the damaged aortic wall, vascular injury is associated with a high primary mortality rate and a significant risk of secondary aortic rupture. Early clinical signs which may indicate a ruptured thoracic aorta are left sided thoracic pain, reduced ventilation, tachycardia and dyspnoe as well as hypotension in the lower extremities. The primary aim for emergency treatment is to maintain vital organ function and to hemodynamically stabilize the patient. Surgical treatment was previously performed by either direct aortic suture or segmental alloplastic graft interposition using the clamp and sew technique with or without extra-anatomic shunts or extracorporeal circulation. However, endovascular stent graft implantation has now become another treatment option for traumatic aortic rupture. According to the reported data and our own experience there is increasing evidence that endovascular aortic repair might become the treatment of choice for patients with traumatic aortic rupture, with the option of an early, less invasive intervention thus avoiding thoracotomy. Regular follow-up is necessary to detect possible stent graft migration or leakage which could require additional endovascular or open surgical re-interventions.     

Surgical versus endovascular treatment of traumatic thoracic aortic rupture

OBJECTIVES: Blunt traumatic thoracic aortic rupture is a life-threatening surgical emergency associated with high mortality and morbidity. The recent development of endovascular stent-graft prostheses offers a potentially less invasive alternative to open chest surgery, especially in patients with associated injuries. We sought to compare the results of conventional surgical repair and endovascular treatment of traumatic aortic rupture in a single center. METHODS: From July 1998 to January 2004, 20 patients with acute blunt traumatic aortic rupture underwent treatment at our institution. All patients had a lesion limited to the isthmus, and associated injuries. Initial management included fluid resuscitation, treatment of other severe associated lesions, and strict monitoring of blood pressure. Eleven patients (9 men, 2 women; mean age, 32 years) underwent surgical repair, including direct suturing in 6 patients and graft interposition in 5 patients. Ten patients were operated on with cardiopulmonary support (left bypass with centrifugal pump, n = 2; extracorporeal circulation, n = 8). The delay between trauma and surgery was 2.6 days (range, 0-21 days). Nine patients (8 men, 1 woman; mean age, 32 years) underwent endovascular treatment with commercially available devices (Excluder, n = 2; Talent, n = 7). In all patients 1 stent graft was deployed. In 2 patients the left subclavian artery was intentionally covered with the device. The delay between trauma and endovascular treatment was 17.8 days (range, 1-68 days). RESULTS: One patient in the surgical group (9.1%) died during the intervention. Three surgical complications occurred in 3 patients (27%), including left phrenic nerve palsy (n = 1), left-sided recurrent nerve palsy (n = 1), and hemopericardium 16 days after surgery that required a repeat intervention (n = 1). No patient in this group had paraplegia. In the endovascular group successful stent-graft deployment was achieved in all patients, with no conversion to open repair. No patient died, and no procedure-related complications, including paraplegia, occurred in this group. Control computed tomography scans obtained within 7 days after endovascular treatment showed exclusion of pseudoaneurysm in all cases. Length of follow-up for endovascular treatment ranged from 3 to 41 months (mean, 15.1 months). Computed tomography scans obtained 3 months after endovascular treatment showed complete disappearance of pseudoaneurysm in all patients. CONCLUSION: In the treatment of blunt traumatic thoracic aortic rupture, the immediate outcome in patients who receive endovascular stent grafts appears to be at least as good as observed after conventional surgical repair. Long-term follow-up is necessary to assess long-term effectiveness of such management.     

Endovascular management of blunt abdominal aortic injury

The endovascular management of blunt aortic injuries is being used more frequently in the trauma patient. Traumatic aortic injuries usually occur in the descending thoracic aorta near the origin of the left subclavian artery. Many reports in the literature demonstrate the efficacy of endovascular repair of blunt thoracic aortic injury. We report here an unusual case of abdominal aortic dissection secondary to blunt abdominal trauma following a fall. The patient also had associated intra-abdominal injuries requiring bowel resection and repair of small bowel mesenteric lacerations. He was treated with a bifurcated abdominal endograft with an excellent result after the initial operation was performed to treat the bowel injuries.     

Anterior approach to traumatic mid aortic arch transection

The majority of nonpenetrating traumatic injuries to the thoracic aorta are fatal. Survivors of aortic transection tend to have injuries occurring at the isthmus. We report a rare, blunt traumatic complete transection of the mid aortic arch between the innominate and left common carotid arteries diagnosed by multidetector computed tomography of the chest. The repair was approached anteriorly and required aortic arch replacement.     

Endovascular treatment in diseases of the descending thoracic aorta: 6-year results of a single center

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate endovascular treatment in diseases of the descending thoracic aorta. Material and methods: This study was designed as a single center's (university hospital) experience. Over a 6-year period (1995 to 2001), thoracic endografts were placed in 74 patients with a diseased descending thoracic aorta who were at high risk for conventional open surgical repair: 34 had atherosclerotic aneurysms, six had posttraumatic aneurysms, 14 had type B dissection with aneurysmal dilatation of the false lumen, 12 had isthmic transections from blunt trauma, five had thoracoabdominal aneurysms (treated with a combined procedure), two had aortic coarctation, and one had an aortobronchial fistula. Twenty-six procedures (35.1%) were conducted as emergencies, and 48 (64.9%) were elective. The feasibility of endovascular treatment and sizing of stent grafts were determined with preoperative spiral computed tomography and intraoperative angiography. RESULTS: Endovascular operations were completed successfully in all 74 patients; postprocedural conversion to open repair was necessary in three cases. The overall 30-day mortality rate was 9.5% (seven deaths). Temporary neurologic deficits developed in two patients; not one patient had permanent paraplegia. The primary endoleak rate was 20.3% (15 patients). The mean follow-up period was 22 months (range, 3 to 72 months). Five deaths occurred in the follow-up period, and three patients needed secondary conversion to open repair 2, 3, and 14 months after initial endografting. CONCLUSION: Endoluminal treatment in diseases of the thoracic descending aorta is feasible and may offer results as good as the open method.     

Endovascular repair of aortic rupture.

OBJECTIVES: To report a single centre experience with endovascular repair of ruptures of the descending thoracic and abdominal aorta. DESIGN: Retrospective non-randomised study in a university hospital. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between February 1997 and October 2002, endovascular repair of the aorta was performed on 125 occasions. In 20 cases, this was done as an emergency (nine ruptured infrarenal aortic aneurysms and 11 descending thoracic aortic ruptures). All patients underwent spiral computed tomographic angiography to assess the feasibility of endovascular repair and the size of the endoprosthesis. RESULTS: Endovascular repair was successfully completed in all patients. Primary conversion to open repair was not necessary. Postoperative 30-day mortality was 5/20 (25%). There were major complications in 12/20 patients. No ruptures of the aneurysms occurred postoperatively. No primary endoleaks occurred, but in 4/20 (20%) secondary surgical interventions were required after a median follow-up of 12 months (range 1-42 months). CONCLUSION: Our early experience shows the feasibility of this technique with early results that compare favourably to those of emergency open repair. Further studies are required to assess the long-term efficacy.     

Endovascular repair of a traumatic infrarenal aortic transection: a case report and review

Blunt abdominal aortic trauma occurs in up to 0.04% of all nonpenetrating traumas. Although uncommon, mortality from this injury ranges from 18% to 37%. Seat belt injury is associated with almost 50% of reported blunt abdominal aortic traumas. The authors present the case of a 21-year-old man, a restrained passenger who was involved in a high-speed motor vehicle accident. In the emergency room, he had obvious evidence of lap-belt injury. His peripheral pulses were normal and there was no pulsatile abdominal mass. Computer tomography (CT) revealed a large amount of free intraperitoneal fluid throughout with signs of mesenteric avulsion and fracture/dislocation of T11-T12. The patient underwent an exploratory laparotomy. Right hemicolectomy and resection of small bowel was performed. CT angiography revealed an aortic transection and surrounding pseudoaneurysm 2 cm above the aortic bifurcation. The patient returned to the operating room for endovascular repair. Via a right femoral cutdown, a 14 mm x 5.5 cm stent-graft was placed across the distal abdominal aorta. Follow-up arteriogram revealed complete obliteration of the pseudoaneurysm without evidence of leak. There were no complications related to the aortic stent-graft in the postoperative period. The patient was discharged in good condition. As this case demonstrates, endovascular repair of traumatic aortic injury is feasible and may represent an improved treatment in certain settings.     

Rapid diagnosis of thoracic aortic transection using intravenous digital subtraction angiography

Rupture of the thoracic aorta associated with blunt trauma remains a frequently lethal injury. Although increasing numbers of patients with ruptured aortas are surviving to reach the hospital, the in-hospital mortality attending this injury remains high. Death due to transected aorta has been related to a delay in diagnosis. In an attempt to decrease the time necessary for diagnosis of this injury, we studied 50 patients using intravenous digital subtraction angiography (IVDSA) and conventional biplane angiography. We found that IVDSA was significantly faster than conventional biplane angiography, and that when IVDSA films are of diagnostic quality, they are sufficient to reliably demonstrate the presence of traumatic aortic transection. Our study was too small to establish whether IVDSA is a sufficiently sensitive test to exclude aortic injury. Further studies in this area need to be performed.     

Endovascular treatment of traumatic ruptures of the thoracic aorta

Rupture of the thoracic aorta after a blunt traumatic accident is a life-threatening event. This injury is instantly fatal in about 80% of the victims, and half of those who initially survive the incident will die during the first day, if left untreated. Before 1997, patients were treated with an open repair, but the conventional surgical approach carries a high mortality and morbidity rate. Graft interposition and cross-clamping of the aorta are responsible for a high paraplegia rate. Despite the fact that active distal perfusion of the aorta lowers the incidence of neurological deficit, the timing of these extensive procedures in the severely injured multi-trauma patient is difficult. The endovascular repair of a traumatic thoracic aortic rupture has gained rapid acceptance as a better alternative. This minimally invasive procedure has a median operating time of <1 h, and it can be done during the same session in which other life-threatening injuries are repaired. There is no need for a thoracotomy or single lung ventilation, blood loss is minimal and systemic heparinization is not required. So far, no spinal cord ischemia has been described for the endovascular repair. Besides numerous advantages, a few problems can be expected. The narrow aortic diameter of these young trauma-victims, combined with a steep aortic arch, makes the adaptation of the endograft along the inner curvature sometimes difficult. Because the smallest endograft usually exceeds the narrow aortic diameter, only excessively oversized devices can be used, which explains the high type I endoleak encountered in the published series. No randomized studies are yet available comparing the open with the endovascular technique, but the initial results of the endovascular repair seem promising and lower mortality and morbidity rates are documented. Long-term outcome are lacking so far, but are needed to address the durability of the procedure. Further research and development should concentrate on the problems we have seen with steep and narrow aortic arches, and devices with more flexible curves and smaller diameters should become available in the near future.