Effects of pallidotomy and levodopa on walking and reaching movements in Parkinson's disease.

We examined the effects of levodopa and unilateral pallidotomy on quantitative measures of walking and reaching in Parkinson's disease (PD). We also compared quantitative measures of movement with standard clinical rating scales. We used kinematic measures and the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor subscale (subscale III) to evaluate the movement of 10 people with PD. Subjects were tested after withholding PD medications for at least 8 hours and again 30 to 45 minutes after taking the first morning dose of levodopa. They were studied in this manner before unilateral pallidotomy and then 3.5 to 10 months after surgery. The UPDRS motor subscale was performed in each state. Kinematic data were collected as subjects reached to a target and walked. The UPDRS motor subscale ratings were similar to those reported in the literature: pallidotomy improved the overall motor score and the contralateral bradykinesia + rigidity score, but not the gait + posture score. In contrast, kinematic measures demonstrated that levodopa and pallidotomy had different effects on walking and reaching speed. Both treatments improved walking speed, and the effect was additive. Levodopa improved reaching speed before pallidotomy but did not improve it as much after pallidotomy. Additionally, pallidotomy had inconsistent effects on reaching; some subjects were faster and others were slower. The subjects who initially reached more slowly improved after pallidotomy; the subjects who initially reached more normally (faster) worsened after pallidotomy. On the basis of our results, we speculate that basal ganglia output pathways that control walking and reaching may be distinct, such that bilateral projections to the pedunculopontine area influence walking, whereas ipsilateral thalamocortical projections influence reaching.     

Staged unilateral versus bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulator implantation in Parkinson disease.

In 17 consecutive patients with Parkinson disease (PD), bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) stimulators were implanted during staged surgeries. The Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and the Dyskinesia Disability Scale were completed both off and on medication prior to any surgery and also OFF and ON stimulation after each surgery. On-medication UPDRS activities of daily living (ADL) and motor examination scores changed little with unilateral or bilateral stimulation. Off-medication UPDRS motor examination scores improved to similar degrees after each staged STN electrode implantation. Most of the improvements in off-medication ADL scores, dyskinesia scores, complications of therapy, and medication dose reduction occurred after unilateral STN stimulation with smaller improvements after the second operation.     

双侧丘脑底核电刺激对帕金森病患者脑局部糖代谢的影响

目的 研究双侧丘脑底核(subthalamic nucleus,STN)慢性电刺激术(deep brain stimulation,DBS)对晚期帕金森病(Parkinson's disease,PD)患者静止期脑局部糖代谢的影响,并探讨其作用机制。方法 对5例进行双侧STN的DBS治疗的晚期帕金森病患者,分别在术前以及术后1个月电刺激条件下,进行静止期18F-脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)/PET检查和UPDRS运动评分,并通过SPM99统计学软件进行数据分析,比较STN的DBS治疗对脑内代谢的影响。结果 双侧STN的DBS治疗使PD患者临床症状明显改善,同时脑局部糖代谢也发生了明显变化:双侧豆状核、脑干(中脑、脑桥)、双侧顶枕部、运动前区(BA6)及扣带回的脑代谢增加,双侧前额叶底部海马的脑代谢明显减少(P<0.05)。结论 双侧STN的DBS治疗可能通过兴奋STN轴突的方式,使其投射区域的基底上行和下行通路以及相应的皮层高级中枢的代谢改善,从而使PD患者的临床症状改善。     

Unilateral vs. bilateral STN DBS effects on working memory and motor function in Parkinson disease

Bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) can reduce working memory while improving motor function in Parkinson disease (PD), but findings are variable. One possible explanation for this variability is that the effects of bilateral STN DBS on working memory function depend in part on functional or disease asymmetry. The goal of this study was to determine the relative contributions of unilateral DBS to the effects seen with bilateral DBS. Motor (Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale Part III, UPDRS) and working memory function (Spatial Delayed Response, SDR) were measured in 49 PD patients with bilateral STN DBS while stimulators were Both-off, Left-on, Right-on and Both-on in a randomized, double-blind manner. Patients were off PD medications overnight. Effects of unilateral DBS were compared to effects of bilateral STN DBS. Mean UPDRS and SDR responses to Left-on vs. Right-on conditions did not differ (p>.20). However, improvement in contralateral UPDRS was greater and SDR performance was more impaired by unilateral DBS in the more affected side of the brain than in the less affected side of the brain (p=.008). The effect of unilateral DBS on the more affected side on contralateral UPDRS and SDR responses was equivalent to that of bilateral DBS. These results suggest that motor and working memory function respond to unilateral STN DBS differentially depending on the asymmetry of motor symptoms.     

Chronic inhibition of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson's disease

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) has become a popular treatment option for patients suffering from severe Parkinson's disease (PD). Yet the long-term outcome of subthalamic DBS is unknown. A total of 27 patients suffering from severe PD underwent bilateral stereotactic implantation of high-frequency stimulators in the STN. Before surgery and at least annually after surgery they were examined with the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS). This study presents the results of a mean 30 months (range 23 to 55) follow-up of these patients. We found stable and significant off medication improvement of motor function by DBS (between 40% and 44% in the UPDRS part III). While on medication there was no significant change in the motor function by DBS. UPDRS part III worsened gradually during the follow-up period, suggesting disease progression. Thirty months postsurgery the UPDRS part II (ADL) was still improved by 17%. There was a lasting decrease in fluctuations by more than 50%, and dyskinesias were reduced by about 70%. Freezing was reduced significantly from 2.2 in the UPDRS part II to 1.2 at the endpoint. The daily levodopa-equivalent dose was reduced by 39% at 12 months and by 30% at 30 months after STN stimulator implantation. Subthalamic DBS improves sustainable motor function in patients with severe Parkinson's disease and leads to a lasting reduction of medication. Limitations of this procedure were found for disturbances of speech and swallowing.     

Bilateral subthalamic stimulation effects on oral force control in Parkinson's disease

Dysarthria in Parkinson's disease (PD) consists of articulatory, phonatory and respiratory impairment. Bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) stimulation greatly improves motor disability, but its long-term effect on speech within a large group of patients has not been precisely evaluated. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of bilateral STN stimulation on oral force control in PD. We measured forces of the upper lip, lower lip and tongue in twenty-six PD patients treated with bilateral STN stimulation. Measurements of the articulatory organ force, as well as a motor evaluation using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), were made with and without STN stimulation. Maximal voluntary force (MVF), reaction time (RT), movement time (MT), imprecision of the peak force (PF) and the hold phase (HP) were all improved with STN stimulation during the articulatory force task, as well as the motor examination scores of the UPDRS. It seems that the beneficial STN stimulation-induced effect on articulatory forces persisted whatever the duration of post-surgical follow-up. However, dysarthria evaluated by the UPDRS was worse in two subgroups of patients with a one to two year and three to five year post-surgical follow-up, in comparison with a subgroup of patients with a three month follow-up. STN stimulation has a beneficial long-term effect on the articulatory organs involved in speech production, and this indicates that parkinsonian dysarthria is associated, at least in part, with an alteration in STN neuronal activity. Nevertheless, to confirm the persistence of the beneficial effect of STN stimulation on parkinsonian dysarthria, a longitudinal evaluation is still needed. Received: 2 January 2002, Received in revised form: 27 August 2002, Accepted: 3 September 2002 Correspondence to S. Pinto     

Bilateral deep brain stimulation of subthalamic nucleus STN in the surgical treatment of Parkinson's disease

Dopamine deficiency in the nigrostriatal system leads to a series of changes in the basal ganglia, resulting in an increased neuronal activity of the subthalamic nucleus (STN). Reduction of the STN glutaminergic excitatory effect on the main output structures of the basal ganglia (globus pallidum pars interna GPi and substantia nigra pars reticulata SNr) is accompanied by a marked alleviation of parkinsonian motor sings in the MPTP monkey model of parkinsonism. Also a high-frequency stimulation of STN in the MPTP monkey model of parkinsonism produced the same clinical effect as did lesioning. Due to these observations bilateral deep subthalamic stimulation was introduced in the treatment of PD patients with severe akinetic-rigid form of this disease. Four patients with akinetic-rigid PD form of PD were included in the study. The electrodes for deep brain stimulation were implanted in two separate surgical interventions in every case. The second implantation was performed not earlier than at least 3 months after the first procedure. Evaluations using the UPDRS were conducted before surgery in "on" and "off" conditions and at 3, 6 and 12 months after the bilateral implantation. Bilateral DBS STN seems to be the best stereotactic target in controlling motor symptoms in the "off" condition in the treatment of PD patients with severe symptoms. The technique enables a dramatic reduction in the daily dose of L-dopa.     

Bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation after bilateral pallidotomies in a patient with advanced Parkinson's disease

A 54-year-old man with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) presented to our institution in early 2000. He had undergone a right pallidotomy in 1994, a left pallidotomy in 1996, and bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) electrode implants in 1999. The patient had cervical myelopathy for which he had undergone neck surgery in 1998. We used the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) to evaluate motor performance in four states: combinations of stimulation OFF or ON and medication OFF or ON. There was no significant change in motor UPDRS scores with STN stimulation or with medications. Multiple attempts to optimize stimulation parameters and medication dosages did not result in significant and sustained improvement in activities of daily living or motor performance. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of bilateral STN stimulation after bilateral pallidotomies. The presence of cervical myelopathy and the limited response to anti-Parkinson medications in this patient underscores the importance of patient selection for functional neurosurgery in PD.     

Effect of bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation on balance and finger control in Parkinson's disease

We aimed to quantify the effects of bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) stimulation in Parkinson's disease (PD) on stance and gait ("axial"motor control), and related this to effects on finger movements ("appendicular" motor control). Fourteen PD patients and 20 matched controls participated. Subjects completed several balance and gait tasks (standing with eyes open or closed, on a normal or foam surface; retropulsion test; walking with eyes closed; walking up and down stairs; Get Up and Go test). Postural control was quantified using trunk sway measurements (angle and angular velocity) in the roll and pitch directions. Subjects further performed a pinch grip reaction time task, where we measured isometric grip forces, as well as movement and reaction times. Patients were examined with STN stimulators switched on or off (order randomised across patients), always after a supramaximal levodopa dosage. STN stimulation improved postural control, as reflected by a reduced trunk sway tremor during stance, a reduced duration for all gait tasks, an increased trunk pitch velocity while rising from a chair, and improved roll stability. STN stimulation also improved finger control, as reflected by a reduced time to reach maximum grip force, without altering reaction times and maximum force levels. Improvements in finger control timing did not correlate with reduced task durations during gait. We conclude that STN stimulation affords improvement of postural control in PD, over and above optimal drug treatment. STN stimulation also provides a simultaneous effect on distal and axial motor control. Because improvements in distal and axial motor control were not correlated, we assume that these effects are mediated by stimulation of different structures within the STN.     

Subthalamic nucleus stimulation in tremor dominant parkinsonian patients with previous thalamic surgery

Before the introduction of high frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN), many disabled tremor dominant parkinsonian patients underwent lesioning or chronic electrical stimulation of the thalamus. We studied the effects of STN stimulation in patients with previous ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) surgery whose motor state worsened. Fifteen parkinsonian patients were included in this study: nine with unilateral and two with bilateral VIM stimulation, three with unilateral thalamotomy, and one with both unilateral thalamotomy and contralateral VIM stimulation. The clinical evaluation consisted of a formal motor assessment using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and neuropsychological tests encompassing a 50 point frontal scale, the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale, and the Beck Depression Inventory. The first surgical procedure was performed a mean (SD) of 8 (5) years after the onset of disease. STN implantation was carried out 10 (4) years later, and duration of follow up after beginning STN stimulation was 24 (20) months. The UPDRS motor score, tremor score, difficulties in performance of activities of daily living, and levodopa equivalent daily dose significantly decreased after STN stimulation. Neither axial symptoms nor neuropsychological status significantly worsened after the implantation of the STN electrodes. The parkinsonian motor state is greatly improved by bilateral STN stimulation even in patients with previous thalamic surgery, and STN stimulation is more effective than VIM stimulation in tremor dominant parkinsonian patients.     

Deep brain stimulation of both subthalamic nucleus and internal globus pallidus restores intracortical inhibition in Parkinson's disease paralleling apomorphine effects: a paired magnetic stimulation study.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the effect of bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) and internal globus pallidus (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS) on intracortical inhibition (ICI) in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS: The activity of intracortical inhibitory circuits was studied in 4 PD patients implanted with stimulating electrodes both in STN and GPi by means of paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation, delivered in a conditioning-test design at short (1-6 ms) interstimulus intervals (ISI). The effect of apomorphine on the same PD patients was also investigated. RESULTS: We observed that implanted PD patients showed a significant increase in ICI during either bilateral STN or GPi DBS at 3 ms ISI, and during bilateral STN DBS at 2 ms ISI in comparison to their off DBS condition. The same statistical improvement was observed during apomorphine infusion at 3 and 2 ms ISI. In each condition, the electrophysiological changes were associated with a significant clinical improvement as measured by the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor examination. CONCLUSIONS: These results are consistent with the hypothesis that basal ganglia DBS can mimic the effects of pharmacological dopaminergic therapy on PD patients cortical activity. We propose that in PD patients, the basal ganglia DBS-induced improvement of ICI may be related to a recovery in modulation of thalamo-cortical motor pathway.     

Temporal changes in movement time during the switch of the stimulators in Parkinson's disease patients treated by subthalamic nucleus stimulation

OBJECTIVE: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is a very effective therapy for the advanced phase of Parkinson's disease (PD). The functional inhibition of this nucleus is responsible for a significant improvement of cardinal motor symptoms of PD. The aim of the study was the assessment of the effectiveness of STN DBS on bradykinesia by the analysis of movement time (MT) in 2 conditions: with the stimulators turned on ('stim-on') or off ('stim-off'). METHODS: After pharmacological wash-out, 10 patients submitted to bilateral STN DBS were studied with an MT analyser in 3 phases: stim-on, stim-off and stim-on again, in order to establish the time course of MT lengthening, the posteffect duration and the latency of the effect of STN DBS. MT data were then compared with the UPDRS motor scores. RESULTS: After turning off the stimulators, MT progressively increases, reaching a plateau after about 30 min, which then lasts for the subsequent observation time (2 h). A significant elongation is achieved after the first 5 min. Upon pulse generator activation, MT shows a dramatic shortening, already significant after 2 min. Moreover, we observed a significant correlation between MT and the severity of PD, higher with bradykinesia than with rigidity or tremor. CONCLUSION: Our findings show a relevant effect of STN DBS on MT, a parameter strongly related to bradykinesia. This study confirms the effectiveness of STN inhibition on the whole parkinsonian triad, suggesting that this target can be considered a proper choice for the surgical treatment of advanced PD.     

脑深部电刺激治疗帕金森病的程控

目的探讨丘脑底核脑深部电刺激术治疗帕金森病(PD)的手术方法和脉冲发生器程控调节。方法自2000年1月～2004年2月用脑深部电刺激丘脑底核(STN)治疗帕金森病61例,其中单侧30例,双侧31例。采用磁共振扫描结合微电极记录技术进行靶点定位。术后用帕金森病评定量表(UPDRS)运动评分评价刺激效果。结果61例PD患者术后随访6～36个月,平均11．3个月。脉冲发生器开启时,在“关”状态下,UPDRS运动评分改善率45．2％;在“开”状态下,UPDRS运动评分改善率20．7％,未发现任何并发症。结论脑深部刺激(DBS)能有效控制帕金森病患者的症状,手术并发症少,术后可根据患者的症状调节参数,丘脑底核(STN)已成为治疗帕金森病的最佳靶点。     

Bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation improves balance control in Parkinson's disease

BACKGROUND: Parkinson's disease (PD), the most common basal ganglia degenerative disease, affects balance control, especially when patients change balance strategy during postural tasks. Bilateral chronic stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is therapeutically useful in advanced PD, and reduces the motor signs of patients. Nevertheless, the effects of STN stimulation on postural control are still debatable. AIMS: To assess the impact of bilateral STN stimulation on balance control in PD and to determine how basal ganglia related sensorimotor modifications act on neurosensorial organisation of balance and motor postural programming. METHODS: Twelve subjects aged 45-70 years underwent unified Parkinson's disease rating scale motor (part III) clinical tests, static and dynamic posturography, including sensory organisation and adaptation tests, shortly before and six months after bilateral implantation of electrodes into the STN. RESULTS: The postoperative static test showed an improvement in postural control precision both in eyes open and eyes closed conditions. The dynamic test highlighted the decreased number of falls and the ability of the patients to develop more appropriate sensorimotor strategies when stimulated. The sensory organisation test showed an improvement of equilibrium score and, thus, a better resolution of sensorial conflicts. CONCLUSIONS: STN stimulation allowed a reduction in rigidity and therefore an improvement in the ability to use muscular proprioception as reliable information, resulting in vestibulo-proprioceptive conflict suppression. STN stimulation has a synergistic effect with levodopa for postural control. Accordingly, non-dopaminergic pathways could be involved in postural regulation and STN stimulation may influence the functioning of these pathways.     

Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus: effectiveness in advanced Parkinson's disease patients previously reliant on apomorphine

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease previously reliant on apomorphine as their main antiparkinsonian medication. METHODS: Seven patients with motor fluctuations despite optimal medical treatment given as predominantly apomorphine infusion (n=6), or intermittent apomorphine injections (n=1) underwent bilateral STN DBS using frameless stereotactic surgery. Standard assessments of parkinsonism and motor fluctuations, using Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) were performed before and six months after surgery. Assessments were performed both on and off medication, and postoperative with the stimulators switched on and off. RESULTS: Bilateral STN DBS improved motor scores (UPDRS III) by 61% when off medication (p<0.05). Clinical fluctuations (UPDRS IV items 36-39) were reduced by 46.2% (p<0.05). Total daily apomorphine dose was reduced by 68.9% (p<0.05) and apomorphine infusion via a pump was no longer required in four patients. There were no operative complications. Two patients required treatment for hallucinations postoperatively but there was no significant change in mini-mental state examination. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced Parkinson's disease, previously reliant on apomorphine, bilateral STN DBS is an effective treatment to reduce motor fluctuations and enable a reduction in apomorphine use.     

OFF-off rebound dyskinesia in subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation of Parkinson's disease.

A 61-year-old man with Parkinson's disease (PD), motor fluctuations, and dyskinesias underwent bilateral implantation of deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes in the subthalamic nucleus (STN). One month after surgery, DBS was optimized to bilateral monopolar settings at the most proximal electrode just superior to the STN, which improved motor fluctuations and dyskinesias. At several postoperative evaluations off medications overnight, both stimulators were turned off and within 60 seconds he developed severe dyskinesias. When the stimulators were turned back on, the dyskinesias soon resolved. This article is a first report of a unique pattern of rebound-type dyskinesia that occurred in the off medication state produced by stopping STN DBS.     

Lack of motor symptoms progression in Parkinson's disease patients with long-term bilateral subthalamic deep brain stimulation

To evaluate the long-term progression of motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients treated with subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS), we retrospectively analyzed data from 50 PD patients with bilateral STN-DBS. Clinical records at baseline and at several yearly intervals were reviewed. The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating scale (UPDRS) was performed preoperatively after withholding medications for at least 12 hr (OFF) and after taking the usual dose of levodopa. Postoperative evaluations were completed in four clinical states: OFF medications—stimulators OFF (OFF/OFF); OFF medications—stimulators ON; ON medications—stimulators OFF; and ON medications—stimulators ON. The UPDRS motor scores OFF/OFF were virtually unmodified up to 5 years when compared with preoperative OFF scores. There was no significant difference between OFF/OFF score variations from baseline in patients with shorter (<11 years) and longer PD duration at the time of surgery. No consistent deterioration from untreated baseline was noted for each UPDRS motor subscore (tremor, rigidity, bradykinesia, and axial). Untreated PD motor scores did not worsen over time in patients undergoing STN-DBS, suggesting that there is no progression of motor severity. These results could be explained either by a natural stabilization of PD motor symptoms after many years or neuroprotective properties of STN-DBS.     

High-frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus selectively decreases central variance of rhythmic finger tapping in Parkinson's disease

Timing is central to all motor behavior, especially repetitive or rhythmic movements. Such complex programs are underpinned by a network of motor structures, including the cerebellum, motor cortex, and basal ganglia. Patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) are impaired in some aspects of timing behavior, presumably as a result of the disruption to basal ganglia function. However, direct evidence that this deficit is specifically due to basal ganglia dysfunction is limited. Here, we sought to further understand the role of the basal ganglia in motor timing by studying PD patients with implanted subthalamic nucleus (STN) electrodes. Patients performed a synchronization-continuation tapping task at 500ms and 2000ms intervals both off and on therapeutic high frequency stimulation of the STN. Our results show that the mean tap interval was not affected by STN stimulation. However, in the un-stimulated state variability of tapping was abnormally high relative to controls, and this deficit was significantly improved, even normalized, with stimulation. Moreover, when partitioning the variance into central and peripheral motor components according to the Wing and Kristofferson model (1973), a selective reduction of central, but not motor, variance was revealed. The effect of stimulation on central variance was dependent on off-stimulation performance. These results demonstrate that STN stimulation can improve rhythmic movement performance in PD through an effect on central timing. Our experimental approach strongly implicates the STN, and more generally the basal ganglia, in the control of timing stability.     

Effect of bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation on parkinsonian gait

Clinical reports show that bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) stimulation is effective in improving parkinsonian gait. Quantitative analysis of the efficacy of STN stimulation on gait is of interest and can be carried out using a commercially available stride analyser. Ten parkinsonian patients (5 men, 5 women) with a mean age of 55.8, SD 9.6 years were included in our study. They had a mean duration of Parkinson's disease (PD) of 13.3, SD 4.5 years and a motor examination score (part III of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale) (UPDRS) of 43, SD 13 in off-stimulation off-drug condition. All the patients had bilateral chronic STN stimulation which had started from 3 to 36 months before the study. Patients were evaluated in off-drug and on-drug conditions both with and without stimulation. We analysed the principal gait measures: velocity, cadence, stride length, gait cycle, duration of single and double limb support. The clinical parkinsonian signs were evaluated with the part III of the UPDRS. In the off-drug condition, STN stimulation significantly (p < 0.05) improved velocity and stride length. The effect was similar to that of levodopa. When STN stimulation was switched on at the best of the levodopa induced effect, no further improvement was observed. The UPDRS motor score was significantly (p < 0.001) decreased after both stimulation and levodopa. In conclusion, STN stimulation is effective on parkinsonian gait.     

Deep brain stimulation for the treatment of Parkinson's disease: subthalamic nucleus versus globus pallidus internus

OBJECTIVES: Deep brain stimulation of the basal ganglia has become a promising treatment option for patients with Parkinson's disease who have side effects from drugs. Which is the best target-globus pallidus internus (GPi) or subthalamic nucleus (STN)-is still a matter of discussion. The aim of this prospective study is to compare the long term effects of GPi and STN stimulation in patients with severe Parkinson's disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Bilateral deep brain stimulators were implanted in the GPi in six patients and in the STN in 12 patients with severe Parkinson's disease. Presurgery and 3, 6, and 12 months postsurgery patients were scored according to the CAPIT protocol. RESULTS: Stimulation of the STN increased best Schwab and England scale score significantly from 62 before surgery to 81 at 12 months after surgery; GPi stimulation did not have an effect on the Schwab and England scale. Stimulation of the GPi reduced dyskinesias directly whereas STN stimulation seemed to reduce dyskinesias by a reduction of medication. Whereas STN stimulation increased the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS) motor score, GPi stimulation did not have a significant effect. Fluctuations were reduced only by STN stimulation and STN stimulation suppressed tremor very effectively. CONCLUSION: Stimulation of the GPi reduces medication side effects, which leads to a better drug tolerance. There was no direct improvement of bradykinesia or tremor by GPi stimulation. Stimulation of the STN ameliorated all parkinsonian symptoms. Daily drug intake was reduced by STN stimulation. The STN is the target of choice for treating patients with severe Parkinson's disease who have side effects from drugs.