Cost‐effectiveness of hepatitis C–positive donor kidney transplantation for hepatitis C–negative recipients with concomitant direct‐acting antiviral therapy

Pilot studies suggest that transplanting hepatitis C virus (HCV)–positive donor (D+) kidneys into HCV‐negative renal transplant (RT) recipients (R?), then treating HCV with direct‐acting antivirals (DAA) is clinically feasible. To determine whether this is a cost‐effective approach, a decision tree model was developed to analyze costs and effectiveness over a 5‐year time frame between 2 choices: RT using a D+/R? strategy compared to continuing dialysis and waiting for a HCV‐negative donor (D?/R?). The strategy of accepting a HCV+ organ then treating HCV was slightly more effective and substantially less expensive and resulted in an expected 4.8 years of life (YOL) with a cost of ≈$138 000 compared to an expected 4.7 YOL with a cost of ≈$329 000 for the D?/R? strategy. The D+/R? strategy remained dominant after sensitivity analyses including the difference in RT death probabilities or acute rejection probabilities between using D+ vs D? kidney; time that D?/R? patients waited for RT; dialysis death probabilities while waitlisted for RT in the D?/R? strategy; DAA therapy expected cure rate; costs of transplant, immunosuppressives, DAA therapy, dialysis, or acute rejection. The D+/R? strategy followed by treatment with DAA is less costly and slightly more effective compared to the D?/R? strategy.     

The impact of hepatitis C virus donor and recipient status on long-term kidney transplant outcomes: University of Wisconsin experience

Singh N, Neidlinger N, Djamali A, Leverson G, Voss B, Sollinger HW, Pirsch JD. The impact of hepatitis C virus donor and recipient status on long‐term kidney transplant outcomes: University of Wisconsin experience. Abstract: The survival benefit of transplanting hepatitis C (HCV)‐positive donor kidneys into HCV‐positive recipients remains uncertain. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of HCV‐status of the donor (D) kidney on the long‐term outcomes in kidney transplant recipients (R). We evaluated 2169 consecutive recipients of deceased‐donor kidney transplants performed between 1991 and 2007. The following HCV cohorts were identified: D?/R? (n = 1897), D?/R+ (n = 59), D+/R? (n = 118), and D+/R+ (n = 95). Patients were followed for a mean of 6.02 (standard deviation = 4.26) yr. In a mulitvariable Cox‐proportional hazards model, D+/R+ cohort had significantly lower patient survival (adjusted‐hazard ratio [HR] 2.1, 95% CI [1.4–2.9]) with respect to the reference D?/R? group, whereas mortality was not increased in D?/R+ group. The rate of graft loss was increased in both D+/R+ and D?/R+ but was comparable with each other (adjusted‐HR 1.8, 95% CI [1.4–2.5]) vs. adjusted‐HR 2.0, 95% CI [1.4–2.8], respectively). D?/R+ cohort experienced significantly higher rate of rejection (adjusted‐HR 1.7, 95% CI [1.2–2.5]) and chronic allograft nephropathy (adjusted‐HR 2.1, 95% CI [1.2–3.7]). Neither donor nor recipient HCV‐status impacted the risk of recurrent or de novo GN. Transplanting HCV‐positive kidneys as opposed to HCV‐negative kidneys into HCV‐positive recipients provided similar graft survival but compromised patient survival in the long term.     

Excessive immunosuppression as a potential cause of poor survival in simultaneous liver/kidney transplantation for hepatitis C

Appropriate recipient selection of simultaneous liver/kidney transplantation (SLKT) remains controversial. In particular, data on liver graft survival in hepatitis C virus‐infected (HCV+) SLKT recipients are lacking. We conducted a single‐center, retrospective study of HCV+ SLKT recipients (N = 25) in comparison with HCV? SLKT (N = 26) and HCV+ liver transplantation alone (LTA, N = 296). Despite backgrounds of HCV+ and HCV? SLKT being similar, HCV+ SLKT demonstrated significantly impaired 5‐year liver graft survival of 35% (HCV? SLKT, 79%, P = 0.004). Compared with HCV+ LTA, induction immunosuppression was more frequently used in HCV+ SLKT. Five‐year liver graft survival rate for HCV+ SLKT was significantly lower than that for LTA (35% vs. 74%, respectively, P < 0.001). Adjusted hazard ratio of liver graft loss in HCV+ SLKT was 4.9 (95% confidence interval 2.0–12.1, P = 0.001). HCV+ SLKT recipients were more likely to succumb to recurrent HCV and sepsis compared with LTA (32% vs. 8.8%, P < 0.001 and 24% vs. 8.8%, P = 0.030, respectively). Ten HCV+ SLKT recipients underwent anti‐HCV therapy for recurrent HCV; only 1 achieved sustained virological response. HCV+ SLKT is associated with significantly decreased long‐term prognosis compared with HCV? SLKT and HCV+ LTA.     

Risk factors for post‐transplant lymphoproliferative disorder after Thymoglobulin‐conditioned hematopoietic cell transplantation

Epstein‐Barr virus (EBV)‐induced post‐transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) occurs frequently when rabbit antithymocyte globulin (ATG) is used in hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) conditioning. We retrospectively studied 554 patients undergoing ATG‐conditioned myeloablative HCT. Strategies used to minimize mortality due to PTLD were either therapy of biopsy‐diagnosed PTLD in the absence of EBV DNAemia monitoring (n = 266) or prompt therapy of presumed PTLD (based on clinical/radiologic signs and high EBV DNAemia, in the setting of weekly EBV DNAemia monitoring) (n = 199). Both strategies resulted in similar mortality due to PTLD (0.7% vs 1% at 2 years, P = .43) and similar overall survival (63% vs 67% at 2 years, P = .23) even though there was a trend toward higher PTLD incidence with the prompt therapy. Donor positive with recipient negative EBV (D+R?) serostatus was a risk factor for developing PTLD. Older patient age, HLA‐mismatched donor, and graft‐versus‐host disease were not associated with increased risk of PTLD. In summary, in ATG‐conditioned HCT, D+R? serostatus, but not older age, mismatched donor or GVHD is a risk factor for developing PTLD. EBV DNAemia monitoring may be a weak risk factor for developing/diagnosing PTLD; the monitoring coupled with prompt therapy does not improve survival.     

Decreasing frequency and improved outcomes of hepatitis C‐related liver transplantation in the era of direct‐acting antivirals – a retrospective cohort study

Benefit of direct‐acting antivirals (DAA) for hepatitis C virus (HCV) on clinical outcomes is unclear. We examined temporal trends in liver transplant (LT) listings, receipt of LT, re‐LT, and survival between pre‐DAA (2009–2012) and DAA era (2013–2016) using UNOS database. Of 32 319 first adult LT, 15 049 (47%) were performed for HCV. Trends on listing, first LT, and of re‐LT for HCV showed 23%, 20%, and 21% decrease in DAA compared to pre‐DAA era (P < 0.0001). One‐year liver graft and patient survival among HCV LT improved in DAA era (90% vs. 86% and 92% vs. 88%, respectively, P < 0.0001). Non‐HCV LT showed no improvement in survival (89% vs. 89% and 92% vs. 92.4%, P = NS). On cox regression, compared to non‐HCV LTs in DAA era, LT for HCV in pre‐DAA era had worse patient survival (HR 1.56 [1.04–2.35]). The outcome was similar when compared to LTs for HCV in DAA era and for non‐HCV in pre‐DAA era. Burden of HCV‐related LT waitlist and LT is declining in DAA era, with improved post‐transplant outcomes, more so in later than earlier DAA era. Our findings negate recent Cochrane meta‐analysis on DAA therapy and encourage studies to examine HCV clinical outcomes outside LT setting.     

Outcomes of short-duration antiviral prophylaxis for hepatitis C positive donor kidney transplants

Trials describing 4- to 12-week courses of direct-acting antiviral drugs (DAAs) to treat hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission from infected donors to uninfected kidney transplant recipients (D+/R− transplants) may be limited in “real-world” application by costs and delayed access to DAAs. We previously reported HCV transmission of 13% among D+/R− transplants with 2- to 4-day pangenotypic sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) perioperative prophylaxis, where one patient with HCV transmission was a nonresponder to first-line full-course DAA. Here, we report new data with a 7-day prophylaxis protocol (N = 50), as well as cumulative treatment and outcome data on all HCV D+/R− transplants (N = 102). Overall, nine patients (9/102; 9%; 95% CI: 5%–16%) developed HCV transmission, with a significant decline noted in the 7-day group (2/50; 4%; 95% CI: 0%–13%) compared with 2- to 4-day prophylaxis (7/52; 13%; 95% CI: 5%–25%). All patients with HCV transmission achieved sustained virologic response post full-course therapy (including one nonresponder from initial trial). A 1:1 matched analysis (N = 102) with contemporary HCV D−/R− transplants (controls) showed that although the pretransplant wait time was significantly shorter for D+/R− compared with D−/R− (mean: 1.8 vs. 4.4 years; p < .001), there were no differences in infections, rejection, development of de novo donor-specific antibody, or transplant outcomes up to 6 months of transplant.     

Interactions between virus‐related factors and post‐transplant ascites in patients with hepatitis C and no cirrhosis: role of cryoglobulinemia

Refractory ascites may appear in liver transplant recipients with recurrence of hepatitis C virus infection, even in the absence of advanced fibrosis. The mechanisms are unclear. The aim was to determine whether post‐transplant cryoglobulinemia could be a predisposing factor for ascites in this population. Retrospective data of 82 liver transplant recipients with HCV recurrence surviving more than 1 year were collected. Cryoglobulinemia was systematically tested after transplantation. All patients had 1‐year protocol biopsy with assessment of sinusoidal distension, perisinusoidal fibrosis, and centrolobular necrosis. Additional biopsies were performed when needed. Fourteen of 82 patients (17%) developed refractory ascites. When ascites appeared, fibrosis was stage F0–F1 in 36% and F2–F3 in 57%. Factors independently associated with post‐transplant ascites were pretransplant refractory ascites (P = 0.001), fibrosis ≥stage 2 at 1 year (P = 0.002), perisinusoidal fibrosis at 1 year (P = 0.02), and positive cryoglobulinemia (P = 0.02). Patients with ascites had a significantly worse prognosis compared to those without ascites. Refractory ascites may occur in liver transplant recipients with HCV recurrence in the absence of advanced fibrosis. The finding that both positive cryoglobulinemia and perisinusoidal fibrosis at 1 year were significantly associated with ascites suggests that liver microangiopathy is involved in the mechanisms of HCV‐related ascites.     

Dynamics of anti‐human leukocyte antigen antibodies after renal transplantation and their impact on graft outcome

The purpose of this study was to sequentially monitor anti‐HLA antibodies and correlate the results with antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR), graft survival (GS), and graft function (GF). We collected sera from 111 kidney transplant recipients on transplant days 0, 7, 14, 30, 60, 90, 180, and 360 and analyzed PRA levels by ELISA. DSAs were analyzed by single‐antigen beads in rejecting kidneys. At pre‐transplant, 79.3% of the patients were non‐sensitized (PRA = 0%) and 20.7% were sensitized (PRA > 1%). After transplant, patients were grouped by PRA profile: no anti‐HLA antibodies pre‐ or post‐transplant (group HLApre?/post?; n = 80); de novo anti‐HLA antibodies post‐transplant (group HLApre?/post+; n = 8); sensitized pre‐transplant/increased PRA post‐transplant (group HLApre+/post↑; n = 9); and sensitized pre‐transplant/decreased PRA post‐transplant (group HLApre+/post↓; n = 14). De novo anti‐HLA antibodies were detected at 7–180 d. In sensitized patients, PRA levels changed within the first 30 d post‐transplant. Incidence of AMR was higher in HLApre?/post+ and HLApre+/post↑ than in HLApre?/post?, and HLApre+/post↓ (p < 0.001) groups. One‐yr death‐censored GS was 36% in group HLApre+/post↑, compared with 98%, 88% and 100% in groups HLApre?/post?, HLApre?/post+, and HLApre+/post↓, respectively (p < 0.001). Excluding first‐year graft losses, GF and GS were similar among the groups. In conclusion, post‐transplant antibody monitoring can identify recipients at higher risk of AMR.     

Renal Transplantation With Final Allocation Based on the Virtual Crossmatch

Solid phase immunoassays (SPI) are now routinely used to detect HLA antibodies. However, the flow cytometric crossmatch (FCXM) remains the established method for assessing final donor–recipient compatibility. Since 2005 we have followed a protocol whereby the final allocation decision for renal transplantation is based on SPI (not the FCXM). Here we report long‐term graft outcomes for 508 consecutive kidney transplants using this protocol. All recipients were negative for donor‐specific antibody by SPI. Primary outcomes are graft survival and incidence of acute rejection within 1 year (AR <1 year) for FCXM+ (n = 54) and FCXM? (n = 454) recipients. Median follow‐up is 7.1 years. FCXM+ recipients were significantly different from FCXM? recipients for the following risk factors: living donor (24% vs. 39%, p = 0.03), duration of dialysis (31.0 months vs. 13.5 months, p = 0.008), retransplants (17% vs. 7.3%, p = 0.04), % sensitized (63% vs. 19%, p = 0.001), and PRA >80% (20% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.001). Despite these differences, 5‐year actual graft survival rates are 87% and 84%, respectively. AR <1 year occurred in 13% FCXM+ and 12% FCXM? recipients. Crossmatch status was not associated with graft outcomes in any univariate or multivariate model. Renal transplantation can be performed successfully, using SPI as the definitive test for donor–recipient compatibility.     

Live donor liver transplantation with older donors: Increased long‐term graft loss due to HCV recurrence

Using our prospectively collected database all adult hepatitis C virus (HCV)‐positive patients receiving an adult‐to‐adult LDLT between October 2000 and May 2014 were identified. Outcome of LDLT with grafts from younger (<50 years=128) vs older donors (≥50 years=31) was compared. Post‐transplant graft function, postoperative complications and incidence of HCV recurrence were evaluated. Long‐term graft and patient survival was calculated. No difference in graft function was observed between younger and older grafts. Overall complications were similar between both groups. The severity of complications determined by the Dindo‐Clavien score was similar. Graft loss from HCV recurrence was significantly less frequent in younger grafts (18% vs 62%, P = 0.001). Young vs older livers had a trend toward improved 1‐, 5‐, and 10‐year graft survival (89% vs 87%, 77% vs 69%, 70% vs 55%, P = 0.096), while patient survival was comparable between both groups (91% vs 90%, 78% vs 69%, 71% vs 60%, P = 0.25). In conclusion, LDLT with older vs younger grafts are more frequently associated with long‐term graft loss due to HCV recurrence. Differences in graft survival might be more prominent with prolonged (≥5‐year) follow‐up. Living donor‐recipient matching is particularly important for younger HCV‐positive recipients.     

Impact of EGF,IL28B,and PNPLA3 polymorphisms on the outcome of allograft hepatitis C: a multicenter study

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is accelerated following liver transplantation (LT). Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) near the epidermal growth factor (EGF) (rs4444903), IL28B (rs12979860), and PNPLA3 (rs738409) loci are associated with treatment response, fibrosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma in non‐transplant hepatitis C, but allograft population data are limited. We sought to determine the role of these SNPs in 264 patients with HCV who underwent LT between 1990 and 2008. Genotypes were determined from donor wedge/allograft biopsies and recipient explants. Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess time to cirrhosis, liver‐related death, and retransplantation, adjusting for donor age and sustained virological response (SVR). Over a median follow‐up of 6.3 yr, a trend toward increased progression to graft cirrhosis was observed among recipients of an EGF non‐AA vs. AA donor liver (adjusted HR 2.01; 95% CI 0.93–4.34; p = 0.08). No other genotypes predicted cirrhosis development or graft survival. The CC IL28B variant in both recipients and donors was associated with increased rate of SVR (R‐CC/D‐CC 8/12[67%], R‐non‐CC/D‐CC or R‐CC/D‐non‐CC 23/52[44%], R‐non‐CC/D‐non‐CC 12/45[27%], p linear trend = 0.009). Recipient EGF, IL28B, and PNPLA3, and donor IL28B and PNPLA3 genotypes do not predict adverse outcomes in HCV LT recipients. A potential association exists between donor EGF genotype and cirrhosis.     

Cytomegalovirus mismatch still negatively affects patient and graft survival in the era of routine prophylactic and preemptive therapy: A paired kidney analysis

The impact of cytomegalovirus (CMV) serostatus on kidney transplant outcomes in an era when CMV prophylactic and preemptive strategies are used routinely is not clearly established. Using United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data, recipients with first deceased donor kidney transplant (≥18 years, 2010‐2015) were stratified into 4 groups in the main cohort: CMV‐seronegative donor (D?)/CMV‐seronegative recipient (R?), CMV‐seropositive donor (D+)/R?, D+/CMV‐seropositive recipient (R+), and D?/R+. In a paired kidney cohort, we identified 2899 pairs of D? kidney transplant with discordance of recipient serostatus (D?/R? vs D?/R+) and 4567 pairs of D+ kidney transplant with discordance of recipient serostatus (D+/R? vs D+/R+). In the main cohort, D+/R? was associated with a higher risk of graft failure (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.17, P = .01), all‐cause mortality (HR = 1.18, P < .001), and infection‐related mortality (HR = 1.38, P = .03) compared with D?/R?. In the paired kidney analysis, D+/R? was an independent risk factor for all‐cause mortality (HR = 1.21, P = .003) and infection‐related mortality (HR = 1.47, P = .04) compared with D+/R+. No difference in graft loss between D+/R? and D+/R+. CMV mismatch is still an independent risk factor for graft loss and patient mortality. The negative impact of D+/R? serostatus on mortality persists after fully matching for donor factors.     

Transplantation of kidneys from hepatitis C‐positive donors into hepatitis C virus‐infected recipients followed by early initiation of direct acting antiviral therapy: a single‐center retrospective study

The availability of direct acting antiviral agents (DAA) has transformed the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. The current study is a case series that reports the outcomes from a cohort of twenty‐five HCV‐infected ESRD patients who received a kidney from an anti‐HCV‐positive deceased organ donor followed by treatment with DAAs in the early post‐transplant period. Time to transplantation and the efficacy of DAA therapy as measured by sustained viral response at 12 weeks were assessed. The median waiting time from original date of activation on the United Network Organ Sharing (UNOS) waiting list until transplantation was 427 days; however, the median time from entering the patient into UNet^sm for a HCV‐positive offer until transplantation was only 58 days. The 25 patients were started on antiviral treatment early post‐transplant (median 125 days) and 24 of 25 (96%) achieved a sustained virologic response at 12 weeks. Tacrolimus dose adjustments were required during antiviral treatment in 13 patients to maintain therapeutic levels. Accepting a kidney from an anti‐HCV‐positive deceased donor shortened the waiting time for HCV‐infected kidney transplant candidates. We recommend that kidneys from anti‐HCV‐positive donors should be considered for transplant into HCV‐infected recipients followed by early post‐transplant treatment with DAA agents.     

Early reduced liver graft survival in hepatitis C recipients identified by two combined genetic markers

HLA and IL‐28B genes were independently associated with severity of HCV‐related liver disease. We investigated the effects of these combined genetic factors on post‐transplant survival in HCV‐infected recipients, aiming to provide new data to define the optimal timing of novel antiviral therapies in the transplant setting. HLA‐A/B/DRB1 alleles and IL‐28B rs12979860 (C > T) polymorphism frequencies were determined in 449 HCV viremic recipients and in their donors. Median follow‐up was 10 years; study outcome was graft survival. HLA‐DRB1*11 phenotype and IL‐28B C/C genotype were significantly less frequent in recipients than donors (27.8% vs. 45.9% and 27.4% vs. 44.9%, respectively, P < 0.00001). Ten‐year graft survival was better in patients with HLA‐DRB1*11 (P = 0.0183) or IL‐28B C/C (P = 0.0436). Conversely, concomitant absence of HLA‐DRB1*11 and IL‐28B C/C in 228 (50.8%) predicted worse survival (P = 0.0006), which was already evident at the first post‐transplant year (P = 0.0370). In multivariable Cox analysis, absence of both markers ranked second as risk factor for survival (HR = 1.74), following donor age ≥ 70 years (HR = 1.77). In the current era of direct‐acting antiviral agents, the negative effects of this common immunogenetic profile in HCV‐infected recipients could be most effectively neutralized by peri‐transplant treatment. This should be particularly relevant in countries where elderly donors represent an unavoidable resource.     

Liver allografts from hepatitis C positive donors can offer good outcomes in hepatitis C positive recipients: a US National Transplant Registry analysis

Organ donors are screened for the hepatitis C antibody (anti‐HCV) and those with positive tests can be used under extended criteria donation. However, there is still a question of long‐term organ viability. The aim of this study was to assess the long‐term outcomes of anti‐HCV positive (HCV+) liver grafts. The US Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network Scientific Registry was reviewed for the period from April 1994 to February 6, 2008 and 56 275 liver transplantations were analyzed. In total, there were 19 496 HCV+ recipients and 934 HCV+ donors. Patient and graft survival were assessed accounting for both donor and recipient anti‐HCV status. Multivariable proportional hazards survival models were developed to adjust for factors known to affect post‐transplant survival. With anti‐HCV negative (HCV?) recipient/HCV? donor as the reference, the adjusted hazard ratio for death was similar for HCV+ recipient/HCV? donor compared with HCV+ recipient/HCV+ donor (1.176 vs. 1.165, P = 0.91). Our results suggest that HCV+ liver donors do not subject the HCV+ recipient to an increased risk for death over the HCV? donor, keeping in mind that careful donor and recipient selection is critical for the proper use of these extended criteria donors.     

Outcome of induction immunosuppression for liver transplantation comparing anti‐thymocyte globulin,daclizumab, and corticosteroid

In addition to standard corticosteroid induction, anti‐thymocyte globulin (ATG) or daclizumab as induction immunosuppression has been reported for liver transplantation. However, the effects and long‐term outcomes of antibody induction therapy are not well known, especially for hepatitis C (HCV). The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database was utilized to analyze 16 898 adult primary liver transplant patients who received ATG alone (n = 452), ATG and steroids (ATG + S) (n = 1758), daclizumab alone (n = 683), or steroid alone (n = 14 005), listed as induction immunosuppression. Graft and patient survival, and donor and recipient factors for survival were analyzed for HCV and all liver diseases. For patients with HCV, ATG + S had significantly inferior graft survival compared with daclizumab (P = 0.01) and steroids (P = 0.03). The Cox proportional hazards model also showed that ATG + S was a marginal risk factor for graft failure (P = 0.05). On the other hand, for patients with all the liver diseases, graft and patient survival were not significantly different between induction regimens. ATG induction appeared to be preferentially used in patients with renal dysfunction, with improvement in renal function after liver transplantation. Thus, ATG induction can be used for patients with renal dysfunction in non‐HCV diseases. Daclizumab induction achieved satisfactory short‐term and long‐term outcomes of liver transplantation in all the liver diseases including HCV disease.     

Accepting hepatitis C virus–infected donor hearts for transplantation: Multistep consent,unrealized opportunity,and the Stanford experience

The current mismatch between supply and demand of organs has prompted transplant clinicians to consider innovative solutions to broaden the donor pool. Advancements of direct‐acting antiviral agent (DAA) therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV) have allowed entertaining the use of viremic donor organs in nonviremic recipients. In this report, we describe the evolution of HCV treatment, ethics and informed consent, cost‐effectiveness of HCV medications in treating acute HCV post‐transplantation, and the Stanford experience with two HCV‐viremic donor heart transplantations. We describe excellent short‐term outcomes post–heart transplantation with HCV NAT‐positive organs. The availability of this therapy may expand the donor pool. While we await larger‐scale clinical data on the effectiveness and safety of DAA therapy in patients after heart transplantation, many transplant centers have already started accepting organs from HCV‐infected donors, balancing the unknown long‐term risks versus the benefits of shorter wait times and expansion of the donor pool. Protocols and multidisciplinary teams are needed to effectively communicate risk to potential recipients, to ensure timely DAA access, and to implement appropriate clinical follow‐up in order to achieve excellent clinical outcomes and to maximize the donor pool by utilizing HCV‐infected organs for heart transplantation.     

Response to antiviral therapy in liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C viral infection: a single center experience

Jain A, Sharma R, Ryan C, Safadjou S, Kashyap R, Mantry P, Maliakkal B, Orloff M. Response to antiviral therapy in liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C viral infection: a single center experience.
Clin Transplant 2010: 24: 104–111. © 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S.   Abstract: 
Introduction:  Recurrence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in hepatic allograft is a major concern after successful liver transplant (LTx).
Aim:  To examine the response rate to pegylated interferon (PEG–IFN) and ribavirin in post-LTx patients with HCV recurrence.
Patients and methods:  Between January 2003 and September 2006, 60 patients with biopsy proven HCV recurrence (46 males and 14 females) received PEG–IFN 2a (n = 40) or IFN 2b (n = 20) with ribavirin. All patients were followed until July 2007.
Results:  Fourteen patients (23.3%) tolerated antiviral therapy for less than six months and 10 (16.7%) discontinued therapy between six and 11 months. PEG–IFN dose was reduced in 21 (35%) patients and ribavirin dose was reduced in 16 (26.7%) patients. Overall, 55% patients achieved end of treatment response (EOT) and 35% sustained virological response (SVR). Mean Hepatitis Activity Index and Fibrosis Score pre-therapy was 5.8 ± 1.9 and 1.7 ± 1.3 and post-therapy, it was 4.4 ± 2.1 and 2.4 ± 1.6, respectively. Overall, three yr patient and graft survival was 73.9% and 69.2%, respectively. The patients with SVR had significantly lower viral load compared with other groups (p = 0.028).
Conclusion:  PEG–IFN and ribavirin therapy achieved 55% EOT and 35% SVR; 60% patients tolerated therapy. Biochemical response was observed in all groups of patients irrespective of virological response.     

Five‐Year Outcomes in Living Donor Kidney Transplants With a Positive Crossmatch

Renal transplant candidates with high levels of donor‐specific anti‐HLA antibodies have low transplantation rates and high mortality rates on dialysis. Using desensitization protocols, good short‐term outcomes are possible in “positive crossmatch kidney transplants (+XMKTx)”, but long‐term outcome data are lacking. The aim of the current study was to determine actual 5‐year graft outcomes of +XMKTx. We compared graft survival and the functional and histologic status of 102 +XMKTx to 204 ?XMKTx matched for age and sex. Actual 5‐year death‐censored graft survival was lower in the +XMKTx group (70.7% vs. 88.0%, p < 0.01) and chronic injury (glomerulopathy) was present in 54.5% of surviving grafts. Graft survival was higher in recipients with antibody against donor class I only compared with antibody against class II (either alone or in combination with class I) (85.3% vs. 62.6%, p = 0.05) and was similar to ?XMKTx (85.3 vs. 88.0%, p = 0.64). Renal function and proteinuria ranged across a wide spectrum in all groups reflecting the different histological findings at 5 years. We conclude that when compared to ?XMKTx, +XMKTx have inferior outcomes at 5 years, however, almost half of the surviving grafts do not have glomerulopathy and avoiding antibodies against donor class II may improve outcomes.     

The impact of direct‐acting antiviral agents on liver and kidney transplant costs and outcomes

Direct‐acting antiviral medications (DAAs) have revolutionized care for hepatitis C positive (HCV+) liver (LT) and kidney (KT) transplant recipients. Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients registry data were integrated with national pharmaceutical claims (2007‐2016) to identify HCV treatments before January 2014 (pre‐DAA) and after (post‐DAA), stratified by donor (D) and recipient (R) serostatus and payer. Pre‐DAA, 18% of HCV+ LT recipients were treated within 3 years and without differences by donor serostatus or payer. Post‐DAA, only 6% of D‐/R+ recipients, 19.8% of D+/R+ recipients with public insurance, and 11.3% with private insurance were treated within 3 years (P < .0001). LT recipients treated for HCV pre‐DAA experienced higher rates of graft loss (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] _1.341.85_2.10, P < .0001) and death (aHR _1.471.68_1.91, P < .0001). Post‐DAA, HCV treatment was not associated with death (aHR _0.340.67_1.32, P = .25) or graft failure (aHR _0.320.64_1.26, P = .20) in D+R+ LT recipients. Treatment increased in D+R+ KT recipients (5.5% pre‐DAA vs 12.9% post‐DAA), but did not differ by payer status. DAAs reduced the risk of death after D+/R+ KT by 57% (_0.190.43_0.95, P = .04) and graft loss by 46% (_0.270.54_1.07, P = .08). HCV treatment with DAAs appears to improve HCV+ LT and KT outcomes; however, access to these medications appears limited in both LT and KT recipients.