Three-Year Follow-Up Study of Retrocolic versus Antecolic Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Background Since 1994, laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) has gained popularity for the treatment of morbid obesity. In analogy to open surgery, the operation was initially performed in a retrocolic fashion. Later, an antecolic procedure was introduced. According to short-term studies, the antecolic technique is favorable. In this study, we compared the retrocolic vs the antecolic technique with 3 years of follow-up. We hypothesized that the antecolic technique is superior to the retrocolic in terms of operation time and morbidity. Methods 33 consecutive patients with retrocolic technique and 33 patients with antecolic technique of LRYGBP were compared, using a matched-pair analysis. Data were extracted from a prospectively collected database. The matching criteria were: BMI, age, gender and type of bypass (proximal or distal). The end-points of the study were: operation time, length of hospital stay, incidence of early and late complications, reoperation rates and weight loss in the followup over 36 months. Results In the retrocolic group, operation time was 219 min compared to 188 min in the antecolic group (P = 0.036). In the retrocolic group, 3 patients (9.1%) developed an internal hernia and 4 patients (12.1%) suffered from anastomotic strictures. In the antecolic group, 2 patients (6.1%) developed internal hernias and in 3 patients (9.1%) anastomotic strictures occurred. Median hospital stay in the retrocolic group was 8 days compared to 7 days in the antecolic group. In the antecolic group, the mean BMI dropped from 46 kg/m2 to 32 kg/m2 postoperatively after 36 months. This corresponds to an excess BMI loss of 66%. In the retrocolic group, we found a similar decrease in BMI from preoperative 45 kg/m2 to 34 kg/m2 after 36 months (P = 0.276). Conclusion The results of our study demonstrate a reduction of operation time and hospital stay in the antecolic group compared to the retrocolic group. No differences between the two groups were found regarding morbidity and weight loss. Taken together, the antecolic seems to be superior to the retrocolic technique.     

Intraoperative Endoscopic Test Resulting in No Postoperative Leaks from the Gastric Pouch and Gastrojejunal Anastomosis in 366 Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypasses

Background: Postoperative leak from the gastric pouch and the anastomosis are leading causes of morbidity and mortality after gastric bypass. Many modalities have been emerging to prevent this complication. 326 consecutive laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypasses (LRYGBP) were analyzed in a two-surgeon practice and found no incidence of leaks from the gastric pouch (GP) and the gastrojejunal anastomosis (GJA) with intraoperative endoscopic testing. Methods: 328 consecutive RYGBP performed in antecolic fashion from March 2003 to January 2004 were analyzed. 326 (99%) were performed laparoscopically. After creating a 15 to 25 cc gastric pouch, integrity of the GP and GJA was tested for leak under saline submersion with endoscopic insufflation and placement of a bowel clamp on the intestinal limb distal to the GJA. Suture repair of apparent leak was performed if needed. Results: Of 326 consecutive LRYGBP utilizing the endoscopic leak test, there was no incidence of leak from the GP or GJA. There was one leak from the jejuno-jejunosotmy which was repaired laparoscopically on postoperative day #1. There was no incidence of leaks in the 2 open RYGBPs. Conclusions: Many "leak prophylaxis" measures have been emerging to prevent this potentially devastating complication. However, checking the GP and GJA with a simple endoscopic test can minimize the incidence of leaks after LRYGBP.     

Antecolic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is not associated with higher complication rates

Since its introduction in 1994, laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) has rapidly gained popularity for the treatment of morbid obesity. Historically, the operation is performed in a retrocolic fashion; however antecolic LRYGB has been advocated as a safe alternative. We reviewed our experience with both techniques. From January 2003 to November 2004, the new UCLA Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery Program performed 341 LRYGBs. In March 2004, our program transitioned from a retrocolic to an antecolic approach for all gastric bypass procedures. Institutional review board approval was obtained, and the data for all patients was collected into a prospective database. The patient characteristics for the two groups were similar. The significant differences between the two groups were average body mass index and the percentage of patients with diabetes and sleep apnea. The complication profiles for the two groups were also similar. There were significant differences between the two groups in the reoperation rate, antecolic 2.0 per cent versus retrocolic 7.8 per cent, and length of stay, antecolic 2.57 versus retrocolic 2.89 days. There were no anastomotic leaks or deaths in either group. Antecolic LRYGB is safe and may be associated with fewer complications. Only long-term weight loss results and complication rates will provide a definitive answer.     

Trends in Internal Hernia Incidence After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Background Internal hernia is a known complication after gastric bypass, especially when performed laparoscopically. The aim of this study was to see when internal hernias occur in relation to weight loss and time course after surgery. Furthermore, we wish to examine the impact of Roux limb positioning ante- versus retrocolic and whether switching to running versus interrupted closure of the mesenteric defects created at surgery made any difference. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients undergoing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery (LRYGB) who developed symptomatic internal hernia requiring operative intervention between January 1, 2000 and September 15, 2006. Results Fifty-four internal hernias occurred in 2,572 patients, an incidence of 2.1%. The site of internal hernias varied: 25 (1%), transverse mesocolon; 22 (0.8%), enteroenterostomy; 7 (0.3%), Peterson’s space. The mean time to intervention for an internal hernia repair was 413 ± 46 days and average % excess body weight loss (%EBWL) in this period was 59 ± 3.3. Subgroup analysis demonstrates internal hernia incidence to be 2 in 357 (0.6%) in antecolic Roux versus 52 in 2,215 (2.4%) in retrocolic Roux limb (odds ratio = 4, P < 0.05). Continuous closure versus interrupted stitching of mesenteric defects does not seem to alter the incidence of internal hernias. Conclusion This study demonstrates that the majority of internal hernias occur after a significant (>50%) EBWL. Furthermore, the antecolic approach is associated with a much reduced incidence of internal hernia.     

Internal hernia after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

BACKGROUND: Internal hernia (IH) is a technical complication of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) that can have severe consequences. Little has been written on characterizing this complication. Antecolic Roux limb passage has been suggested to be safe without defect closure. METHODS: The records of 785 patients who underwent LRYGBP (136 antecolic, 649 retrocolic) between 1998 and 2003 were reviewed. In our early experience (n = 107), we used a retrocolic technique without defect closure. RESULTS: Twenty patients underwent surgical intervention for IH. The median interval between LRYGBP and symptom onset was 303 days (range, 25 to 1642 days). Abdominal pain was uniformly present, and 63% of patients developed nausea and/or vomiting. Exploratory laparoscopy was attempted in 94% of patients; conversion was necessary in 33%. A total of 21 IHs were identified (13 Petersen's, 5 mesocolic, 2 jejunojejunal, and 1 adhesion-related hernia). No nonviable bowel was identified, and no deaths occurred. A retrocolic technique involving closure of all defects resulted in the lowest rate of hernias (3/542; 0.55%) compared with the antecolic (12/136; 8.81%; P < .0001) and early retrocolic techniques (6/107; 5.6%; P < .0002). CONCLUSION: IH can occur long after gastric bypass surgery, and a low threshold for reoperation is crucial to avoid gut infarction. A retrocolic technique with defect closure appears to afford the lowest risk of IH. The lower incidence of IH in other series after antecolic technique likely results from a less aggressive detection and management approach, because our nonclosure technique could not differ from that of other authors. All defects must be closed to minimize the risk of hernia, whether antecolic or retrocolic.     

Laparoscopic antecolic Roux-En-Y gastric bypass with closure of internal defects leads to fewer internal hernias than the retrocolic approach

Background  Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery reportedly has a higher rate of postoperative internal hernias than open bypass surgery. Even with closure of mesenteric defects, hernias occur in up to 9% of cases. To minimize this complication, an antecolic antegastric approach to anastomosis of the Roux limb and gastric pouch has been used. Whereas the retrocolic retrogastric technique creates three mesenteric defects, the antecolic approach produces only two: Petersen’s defect and the jejunojejunostomy. The rate of internal hernias was compared among patients undergoing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery using the retrocolic and antecolic approaches. Methods  The experience of a single surgeon from August 2001 to September 2005 was reviewed. Only Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedures were included. Patients were followed for a minimum of 18 months postoperatively. The retrocolic approach was used for 274 patients and the antecolic approach for 205 patients. All defects were closed at the time of surgery. With the antecolic approach, Petersen’s defect was closed from the root of the mesentery of the Roux limb and the transverse colon mesentery up to the transverse colon. Results  Of the 274 patients, 7 (2.6%) experienced a symptomatic internal hernia with the retrocolic retrogastric technique. No internal hernias were reported among the 205 patients treated with the antecolic antegastric method. Chi-square analysis showed that an antecolic approach was associated with a decreased rate of internal hernias (p < 0.025). Of 479 patients, 35 (7%) underwent diagnostic laparoscopy without any internal hernia found. Of these patients, 15 were found to have cholelithiasis and subjected to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Conclusions  The antecolic antegastric approach to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is associated with fewer postoperative hernias than the retrocolic retrogastric approach. The frequency of hernias using either technique is low if meticulous attention is paid to closure of all mesenteric defects. Presented at the 2007 Society of American Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) meeting in Las Vegas, SS16: Outcomes, Presentation: S097, Sunday 22 April 2007     

Routine Upper Gastrointestinal Gastrografin® Swallow after Laparoscopic Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass

Background: Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) swallow radiographs following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) may detect an obstruction or an anastomotic leak. The aim of our study was to determine the efficacy of routine imaging following LRYGBP. Methods: Radiograph reports were reviewed for 201 consecutive LRYGBP operations between April 1999 and June 2001. UGI swallow used Gastrografin?, static films, fluoroscopic video, and a delayed image at 10 minutes. Mean values with one standard deviation were tested for significance (P<0.05) using the Mann-Whitney U test statistic. Results: Of 198 available reports, UGI detected jejunal efferent (Roux) limb narrowing (n=17), partial obstruction (n=12), anastomotic leak (n=3), complete bowel obstruction (n=3), diverticulum (n=1), hiatal hernia (n=1), and proximal Roux limb narrowing (n=1). A normal study was reported in 160 cases (81%). Partial obstruction resolved without intervention. Complete obstruction required re-operation. Compared to 6 patients who developed delayed leaks, early identification of a leak by routine UGI swallow resulted in a shorter hospital stay (mean 7.7±1.5 days vs 40.2±12.3 days, P<0.03). Conclusions: Early intervention after UGI swallow may lessen morbidity. Routine UGI swallow following LRYGBP does not obviate the importance of close clinical follow-up.     

Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass: Development of Technique,Respiratory Function,and Long-Term Outcome

Background: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) is the preferred operation for the treatment of morbid obesity by many surgeons. Hereby we present the process by which laparoscopic RYGBP (LRYGBP) developed at our institution. Methods: Perioperative morbidity was recorded from 150 consecutive morbidly obese patients operated upon by RYGBP from August 1994 to March 2002. The first 76 consecutive patients have been followed up to 5 years postoperatively. A subgroup of 40 patients was recruited to evaluate the postoperative lung function in a randomized study between receiving and not receiving prophylactic chest physiotherapy. Results: In the whole series, there were 4 conversions to open surgery, 5 leaks, 12 postoperative bleedings and 1 intestinal obstruction. 1 patient succumbed after developing acute dilatation of the bypassed stomach. Respiratory function deteriorated significantly in all patients in the early postoperative period, irrespective if given physiotherapy. During the follow-up period, 3 patients developed mechanical obstruction of the Roux limb. Another patient had a perforated ulcer at the proximal pouch. Weight reduction averaged 70% of excess body weight at 2 years after surgery. Conclusions: LRYGBP is an effective treatment for morbid obesity. During the initial development, we experienced a number of serious complications. The complication rate decreased over time. Postoperative lung function was markedly impaired, but there were no beneficial effects of chest physiotherapy. Long-term weight loss after LRYGBP seems to be comparable to what has been reported after open RYGBP.     

A Reduction in Delayed Gastric Emptying by Classic Pancreaticoduodenectomy with an Antecolic Gastrojejunal Anastomosis and a Retrogastric Omental Patch

Background  Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) continues to be a major cause of morbidity following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). A change in the method of reconstruction following PD was instituted in an attempt to reduce the incidence DGE. Methods  Patients undergoing PD from January 2002 to December 2008 were reviewed and outcomes determined. Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) with a retrocolic duodenojejunal anastomosis (n = 79) or a classic PD with a retrocolic gastrojejunostomy (n = 36) was performed prior to January 2008. Thereafter, a classic PD with an antecolic gastrojejunal anastomosis and placement of a retrogastric vascular omental patch was undertaken (n = 36). Results  A statistically significant decrease in DGE was noted in the antecolic group compared to the entire retrocolic group (14% vs 40%; p = 0.004) and compared to patients treated by classic PD with a retrocolic anastomosis alone (14% vs 39%; p = 0.016). On multivariate analysis, the only modifiable factor associated with reduced DGE was the antecolic technique with an omental patch, odds ratio (OR) 0.3 (confidence interval (CI) 0.1–0.8) p = 0.022. Male gender was associated with an increased risk of DGE with OR 2.3 (CI 1.1–4.8) p = 0.026. Conclusion  A classic PD combined with an antecolic anastomosis and retrogastric vascular omental patch results in a significant reduction in DGE.     

Intraoperative endoscopic pneumatic testing for gastrojejunal anastomotic integrity during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Background Gastrojejunal anastomotic leaks remain a major source of morbidity following laparoscopic gastric bypass. Intraoperative pneumatic testing has been offered as a method to reduce the incidence of this complication. This study's purpose was to assess the efficacy of intraoperative pneumatic testing during laparoscopic gastric bypass, to evaluate the types of air leaks detected, and to develop an algorithm for management that takes into account air leak categorization and drainage. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on the initial 257 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric bypass by a single surgeon over a 36-month period. The gastrojejunostomy was constructed using a linear stapler technique. All patients underwent intraoperative endoscopic pneumatic testing with a clamp applied to the Roux limb. All patients underwent water-soluble upper gastrointestinal radiography on the first postoperative day. Results Patients were divided based on the pneumatic testing results into groups for data analysis: persistent air leak (group 1), non-reproducible air leak (group 2), and no air leak (group 3). The overall age (41.7±9.3 years), body mass index (BMI) (47.3±6.4 kg/m²), conversion rate (2%), and length of stay (1.9±2.0 days) were not statistically different among groups (p>0.05). In group 1, the air leak site was repaired, and 11 (92%) were drained. In group 2, the air leak site could not be identified, and all 12 (4.7%) were treated by drainage alone. In group 3, drains were placed in 12 (5.2%) due to difficult construction of the gastrojejunostomy. Overall postoperative gastrointestinal leak rate was 0.78%. No postoperative clinical or radiological gastrointestinal leaks occurred within the region tested pneumatically. Intraoperative complications related to pneumatic testing occurred in 1 (0.39%) patient. Conclusions Intraoperative pneumatic testing of the gastrojejunal anastomosis is a safe and rapid means of evaluating anastomotic integrity. Application of this technique permitted timely repair of flawed anastomoses, thereby averting potential postoperative leaks.     

Water-soluble upper GI based on clinical findings is reliable to detect anastomotic leaks after laparoscopic gastric bypass

Anastomotic leak after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LGB) is a major complication that must be recognized and treated early for best results. There is controversy in the literature regarding the reliability of upper GI series (UGI) in diagnosing leaks. LGB was performed in patients meeting NIH criteria for the surgical treatment of morbid obesity. All leaks identified at the time of surgery were repaired with suture and retested. Drains were placed at the surgeon's discretion. Postoperatively, UGI was performed by an experienced radiologist if there was a clinical suspicion of leak. From September 2001 until October 2004, a total of 553 patients (age 40.4 +/- 9.2 years, BMI 48.6 +/- 7.2) underwent LGB at UAB. Seventy-eight per cent (431 of 553) of patients had no clinical evidence suggesting anastomotic leak and were managed expectantly. Twenty-two per cent (122 of 553) of patients met at least one inclusion criteria for leak and underwent UGI. Four of 122 patients (3.2%) had a leak, two from anastomosis and two from the perforation of the stapled end of the Roux limb. No patient returned to the operating room without a positive UGI. High clinical suspicion and selectively performed UGI based on clinical evidence is reliable in detecting leaks.     

Antecolic versus retrocolic alimentary limb in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) has become the most common surgical treatment for morbid obesity. Intestinal obstruction and internal hernias are complications more commonly observed after LRYGB than after open RYGB. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of these complications in patients who had undergone LRYGB using an antecolic versus a retrocolic technique. METHODS: From August 2001 to August 2005, LRYGB was performed in 754 patients. The retrocolic and antecolic technique was used in 300 and 454 consecutive patients, respectively. The mean patient age was 37 +/- 10 years, and 552 of the patients (73%) were women. The mean preoperative body mass index was 41.3 +/- 5 kg/m2. The median follow-up was 16 months. RESULTS: During follow-up, 36 patients (4.7%) underwent surgical exploration secondary to intestinal obstruction. This complication was observed in 28 (9.3%) and 8 (1.8%) patients in the retrocolic and antecolic technique groups, respectively (P <.001). In the retrocolic technique group, an internal hernia developed in 24 patients compared with 3 patients in the antecolic technique group. On multivariate analysis, the retrocolic technique was identified as a risk factor (P <.001). CONCLUSION: A greater incidence of intestinal obstruction and internal hernia was observed in the retrocolic technique group than in the antecolic technique group undergoing LRYGB. The results of our study have shown that the use of the retrocolic technique is a risk factor for intestinal obstruction after LRYGB.     

Predictors, Treatment, and Outcomes of Gastrojejunostomy Stricture after Gastric Bypass for Morbid Obesity

Background The aims of this study were to determine the rate of gastrojejunostomy (GJ) stricture following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP), the independent predictors of stricture, and clinical outcomes with and without a stricture. Methods Univariate and multivariate analysis of peri-operative and outcomes data were prospectively collected from 379 morbidly obese patients who underwent consecutive open or laparoscopic RYGBP from January 2003 to August 2006. Predictors studied were age, gender, BMI, co-morbidities, surgical technique (hand-sewn vs linear stapler vs 21-mm vs 25-mm circular stapler; open vs laparoscopic; retrocolic retrogastric vs antecolic antegastric Roux limb course, and Roux limb length), and surgeon experience. Outcomes studied consisted of occurrence of GJ strictures, technical details and outcomes after endoscopic therapy, and excess weight loss (EWL) at 12 months. Results 15 patients (4.1%) developed a GJ stricture. The use of a 21-mm circular stapler was identified as the only independent predictor of a GJ stricture (odds ratio 11.3; 95% CI 2.2-57.4, P = 0.004). Endoscopic dilation relieved stricture symptoms in all patients (60% one dilation only). There was no significant difference in %EWL at 12 months between the patients with a stricture (median EWL 54%, IQR 49 – 63) vs those without a stricture (median EWL 61%, IQR 49-73, P = 0.33). Conclusion The rate of GJ strictures is 4.1%. The use of a 21-mm circular stapler is the only independent predictor of GJ stricture. Endoscopic dilation relieved symptoms in all patients.Weight loss is independent of the anastomotic technique used and occurrence of a GJ stricture.     

Does the position of the alimentary limb in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery make a difference?

Intestinal obstruction and other complications have been reported following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery. There is controversy of whether the alimentary limb should be placed in the retrocolic or antecolic position. A retrospective analysis was performed on 444 patients undergoing RYGB surgery for morbid obesity during a six year period. During operation, the surgeon chose the positioning of the 75-cm alimentary limb based upon technical consideration (the presence of adhesions from prior surgical procedures, thickness of the transverse mesocolon and mobility of the small bowel mesentery). Group A (216) patients had placement of the Roux limb anterior to the transverse colon, and group B (228) patients had placement of the limb through an opening created in the transverse mesocolon. The average age was 40 years (range 19–64) and the body mass index ranged from 40 to 75 kg/m². Patients were followed for 24–86 months (mean 36 months). Any patients lost to follow-up were excluded. The average age of patients in the study was 40 years (range 19–64 years). Patients in both groups were similar in their body mass index and demographic characteristics. Group A had 16 patients (7.4%) that had early intolerance to enteral intake, compared to 13 patients in group B (5.7%, P>0.05). Thirteen patients required reoperation for intestinal obstruction (seven patients in group A and six patients in group B (P>0.05). Development of anastomotic stricture occurred in one patient (0.5%) in group A and three patients (1%, P>0.05) in group B. There were no differences in mean operating room times, hospital length of stay, and excess weight lost. No other complications during the follow-up period were attributed to the position of the alimentary limb. Placement of the Roux limb in the antecolic position is may be technically more feasible in some patients and does not appear to be associated with more complications. It avoids the risk of an internal hernia through the transverse and does not appear to be associated with feeding difficulties in the early or late postoperative period. Presented at the Plenary Session at the Forty-Seventh Annual Meeting of The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Los Angeles, May 20–25, 2005.     

Obesity Surgery Results Depending on Technique Performed: Long-Term Outcome

Background  Many techniques have excellent results at 2 years of follow-up but some matters regarding their long-term efficacy have arisen. This is why bariatric surgery results must be analyzed in long-term follow-up. The aim of this study was to extend the analysis over 5 years, evaluating weight loss, morbidity, and mortality of the surgical procedures performed. Methods  This was a retrospective cohort study of the different procedures for morbid obesity practiced in our Department of Surgery for morbid obesity. The results have been analyzed in terms of weight loss, morbidity improvement, and postoperative morbidity (Bariatric Analysis And Reporting Outcome System). Results  One hundred twenty-five patients were operated on open vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG), 150 patients of open biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) of Scopinaro, 100 patients of open modified BPD (common limb 75 cm; alimentary limb 225 cm), and 115 patients of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP). Mean follow-up was: VBG 12 years, BPD 7 years, and LRYGBP 4 years. An excellent initial weight loss was observed at the end of the second year of follow-up in all techniques, but from this time an important regain of weight was observed in VBG group and a discrete weight regain in LRYGBP group. Only BPD groups kept excellent weight results so far in time. Mortality was: VBG 1.6%, BPD 1.2%, and LRYGBP 0%. Early postoperative complications were: VBG 25%, BPD 20.4%, and LRYGBP 20%. Late postoperative morbidity was: protein malnutrition 11% in Scopinaro BPD, 3% in Modified BPD group, and no cases reported either in VBG group or LRYGBP group; iron deficiency 20% VBG, 62% Scopinaro BPD, 40% modified BPD, and 30.5% LRYGBP. A 14.5% of VBG group required revision surgery to gastric bypass or to BPD due to 100% weight regain or vomiting. A 3.2% of Scopinaro BPD with severe protein malnutrition required revision surgery to lengthen common limb to 100 cm. A 0.8% of LRYGBP required revision surgery to distal LRYGBP (common limb 75 cm) due to 100% weight regain. Conclusions  The most complex bariatric procedures increase the effectiveness but unfortunately they also increase morbidity and mortality. LRYGBP is safe and effective for the treatment of morbid obesity. Modified BPD (75–225 cm) can be considered for the treatment of superobesity (body mass index > 50 kg/m²), and restrictive procedures such as VBG should only be performed in well-selected patients due to high rates of failure in long-term follow-up.     

Management of Anastomotic Leaks After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Background Anastomotic leaks after bariatric surgery carry high morbidity and mortality. We aimed to describe our experience of the diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks in patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric bypass in a single institution. Methods Of 1,200 patients who underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with manual gastrojejunal anastomosis for morbid obesity from January 2002 to January 2007, we retrospectively analyzed 59 patients with anastomotic leak. The location of the leak, day of diagnosis, diagnostic methods, clinical manifestations, treatment modalities, associated complications, and length of hospital stay were analyzed. Results Leaks were located as follows: 67.8% in the gastrojejunostomy, 10.2% in the gastric pouch, 3.4% in the excluded stomach, 5.1% in the jejunojejunal anastomosis, 3.4% in the gastrojejunostomy plus pouch, 3.4% in the pouch plus excluded stomach, and 6.8% in undetermined sites. Routine upper gastrointestinal series revealed contrast extravasation in nine patients (15.3%). Leaks were asymptomatic at diagnosis in 29 patients (49.2%). Surgical reintervention was carried out in 23 patients, and conservative treatment was provided in the remaining 36. Transfer to the intensive care unit was required in 11 patients, with five deaths (0.4%). Conclusion In our experience, most anastomotic leaks can be managed with conservative measures alone. In many patients, abdominal drains are effective in the management of leaks, obviating the need for reintervention. Nasoenteral nutrition was effective in the non-operative management of gastrojejunal leaks in patients without signs of systemic toxicity.     

Small bowel obstruction after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

BACKGROUND: Despite the proliferation of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP), postoperative bowel obstructions still occur from mesocolonic constrictions, internal hernias, and anastomotic strictures. Obstructed patients do not present with a characteristic history and physical. Therefore, radiographic studies including upper gastrointestinal films and computed tomography are essential for diagnosing these unique obstructive etiologies after LRYGBP. METHODS: From February 2000 to December 2000, 115 patients underwent standard LRYGBP at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation. Retrocolic anastomoses were performed on all patients. Defects at the mesocolon and mesomesentery were closed with interrupted, nonabsorbable sutures. All patients underwent upper gastrointestinal study on the first postoperative day. RESULTS: Six patients developed small bowel obstructions postoperatively. Five of these patients required reexploration. The obstructive etiologies were two mesocolonic constrictions, three internal herniations, and one massive clot at the gastrojejunostomy. Repair of the mesocolonic constrictions involved incising the transverse mesocolon vertically to create a larger window for the Roux limb. Internal herniations were reduced, and defects were reclosed with nonabsorbable sutures. The patient with an obstructive clot was treated endoscopically. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these 6 patients, we have altered our technique to antecolic placement of the Roux limb. This technique requires division of the omentum and additional mobilization of the Roux limb mesentery in order to decrease tension at the gastrojejunostomy. Since initiating these changes and closing all iatrogenic defects, we have not experienced further early small bowel obstructions.     

Micropouch Gastric Bypass: Indications for Gastrostomy Tube Placement in the Bypassed Stomach

Background: Since 1994 we have performed the "micropouch" gastric bypass (MGB) procedure for morbid obesity. In our MGB operation, the transected gastric reservoir is limited to the cardia of the stomach. The Roux and biliopancreatic limbs measure 200 and 150 cm, respectively; radiographic or endoscopic access to the bypassed stomach is therefore excluded. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 1,120 MGB operations revealed that 33 patients (2.9%) developed a potentially life-threatening postoperative complication requiring emergency re-operation or prolonged hospitalization. Complications included anastomotic leaks, fascial dehiscence, gastroenteric obstructions, peptic ulcers, and pancreatitis. Each complication was analyzed to determine if gastrostomy tube (G-tube) placement at the time of gastric bypass could have affected complication outcome or obviated the need for repeat laparotomy. Results: In 19 patients (1.6% of total cohort), G-tube placement would have significantly affected complication outcome. In four instances, it would have prevented emergency re-operation. Conclusions: Routine gastrostomy tube placement at the time of gastric bypass is not necessary in all patients. For patients who are at high risk for a gastro-enteric obstruction or an anastomotic leak, G-tube placement is recommended and is often therapeutic.     

Linear stapler technique may be safer than circular in gastrojejunal anastomosis for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a meta-analysis of comparative studies

The technique of choice for gastrojejunostomy (GJ) during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) for morbid obesity is controversial. We performed a meta-analysis comparing linear versus circular stapler technique to evaluate this issue. A systematic literature search was performed. Primary outcomes were gastrojejunal leak and stricture. Secondary outcomes were operative time, length of hospital stay, post-operative bleeding, wound infection, marginal ulcers and estimated weight loss. Eight studies involving 1,321 patients were retrieved and included in the present study. A significantly decreased risk of GJ stricture was observed after using linear versus circular stapler (RR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.12–0.93; p = 0.04). Wound infection risk (RR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.22–0.67; p = 0.0008) and operative time (MD, −24.18; 95% CI, −35.31, −13.05; p < 0.0001) were significantly reduced by using linear stapling. No significant differences were observed in the other outcome end-points. The use of the linear stapler compared with circular stapler for GJ during LRYGB for morbid obesity may be associated with a reduced risk of anastomosis stricture and wound infection, as well as with a shorter operative time.     

Conservative Management of Anastomotic Leaks after 557 Open Gastric Bypasses

Background: One of the most serious complications after gastric bypass is an anastomotic leak. In a prospective surgical protocol for the management of this complication, the authors determined the incidence of anastomotic leaks Methods: From August 1999 to January 2005, 557 patients with morbid obesity were submitted to laparotomic resectional gastric bypass. In all patients a left drain was placed during surgery. All patients had a radiological study with liquid barium sulphate on the 5th postoperative day. After the occurrence of an anastomotic leak, the daily output of the leak was carefully measured. Results: 12 patients developed an anastomotic leak at the gastrojejunostomy. All were managed medically, with antibiotics if necessary, enteral or parenteral feeding and frequent control by imaging procedures. In 8 patients, the left drain was maintained in situ up to 43 days after surgery. In 4 patients, the drain had been removed between the 5th and 8th days after surgery after a normal radiologic study, but had to be inserted under radiological control 2-3 weeks after the gastric bypass. Daily output increased significantly the second week after surgery, and the leak closed at a mean of 30 days after surgery. One patient of the 12 (8%) died 32 days after surgery from septic shock, without any abdominal collection secondary to the leak. Conclusion: The occurrence of an anastomotic leak is nearly 2% after gastric bypass. The majority of them can be managed medically, without the need for a reoperation, due to the fact that there is no acid production in the small gastric pouch and there is no intestinal reflux due to the long Roux loop.