颗粒松质骨压紧植骨全髋关节置换术治疗创伤性髋关节炎的疗效

目的探讨颗粒松质骨压紧植骨全髋关节置换术(THA)治疗髋臼骨折继发创伤性髋关节炎的疗效。方法1998年12月-2005年5月,对15例髋臼骨折继发创伤性髋关节炎患者行颗粒松质骨压紧植骨THA,所有患者髋臼假体均采用骨水泥固定,颗粒骨均取自体骨,术后24h后开始被动活动,3个月后开始全负重锻炼。临床随访采用Harris髋关节评分(HSS)系统评分,对任何原因引起髋臼假体翻修均视为临床失败。根据Conn等影像学评价法观察颗粒骨长人情况,根据DeLee的三区法测量臼杯、骨水泥与移植骨间的界面宽度,臼杯的移位程度则依据其相对于泪点间线的距离而定。结果14例患者获得平均4．3年(1．0-7．5年)随访,HHS评分由术前平均42分(10-62分)提高到随访结束时平均84分(58-98分)。1例髋部有轻度疼痛,无患者行翻修手术。大部分髋部恢复了其正常的旋转中心,仅有2例高出对侧0．8 mm。大多数患者影像学表现稳定,2例在Ⅰ区和Ⅲ区出现进行性增宽的透亮带,1例在Ⅲ区出现非进行性增宽的透亮带。1例臼杯假体在术后7年出现明显移位(6 mm),但并没有行翻修手术。结论颗粒骨压紧植骨技术作为一种生物学髋臼重建方法,其联合THA治疗髋臼骨折后继发创伤性关节炎伴髋臼缺损的疗效令人满意,能够恢复髋关节的正常解剖和功能活动。     

植骨技术结合金属网杯重建髋臼骨缺损在全髋关节置换术中的应用

 目的 评估植骨技术结合金属网杯重建髋臼骨缺损在全髋关节置换术中的应用价值。方法 2008年1月至2011年11月,采用植骨技术结合金属网杯重建全髋关节置换术中髋臼骨缺损32例(32髋),男23例,女9例;年龄51~76岁,平均66岁。初次全髋关节置换6例,翻修26例。PaproskyⅡB型骨缺损12例,采用打压植骨结合钛网重建;ⅡC型骨缺损13例,采用打压植骨结合钛网重建7例、打压植骨结合金属加强杯重建6例;ⅢA型骨缺损7例,采用结构植骨+打压植骨结合带翼金属加强杯重建6例、双层打压植骨结合钛网及金属加强杯重建1例。疗效通过影像学Gill金属网杯松动评定标准和Harris髋关节评分进行评估。结果 全部病例获得随访,随访时间12~25个月,平均22个月。术后12个月Harris髋关节评分由术前(44.00±11.71)分提高至(78.41±9.32)分;优24例、良4例、可4例,优良率87.5%。3例出现髋臼旋转中心轻度移位,1例发生脱位,其余28例未发生固定物松动、下沉及植骨吸收。结论 根据髋臼缺损Paprosky分型选择钛网或金属加强杯结合打压植骨或结构性植骨技术,可以重建髋臼骨缺损,从而提高髋臼杯的稳定性。     

髋臼内陷症的全髋关节置换术

目的 探讨全髋关节置换术治疗髋臼内陷症的手术操作方法和临床疗效.方法 2003年6月至2008年5月,采用全髋关节置换术治疗髋臼内陷症31例35髋,男16例18髋,女15例17髋;年龄36～71岁,平均52.2岁.手术均采用后外侧入路,股骨头取出困难时采用逆行取出法,分别处理髋臼环和髋臼底,取自体松质颗粒骨修复骨缺损,采用压配方式植入非骨水泥型全髋关节假体.术后1、3、6、12个月门诊随访,以后每年随访1次,随访时采用Harris髋关节评分评估髋关节功能,摄X线片观察假体是否有松动和再次内陷,植骨是否愈合.结果 全部病例随访19～152个月,平均46.5个月.1例患者术后第2天出现右下肢深静脉血栓,经抗凝处理后痊愈;1例术后2个月出现轻度大腿痛,无特殊处理,术后6个月消失,无其他并发症发生.术前Harris髋关节评分平均(48.9±6.5)分,末次随访增至平均(91.2±5.7)分,较术前平均改善42.3分.X线片显示所有假体均获得骨性稳定,无松动和再次内陷,术后平均6个月植骨愈合.结论 对于内陷髋臼,采用不同于普通全髋关节置换的手术技术,外移髋臼至旋转中心,用植骨修复骨缺损,选择非骨水泥型假体重建髋臼,可获得较好的临床效果,髋臼松动和再次内陷发生率低.

Abstract：

Objective To evaluate the clinical outcome of total hip arthroplasty (THA) for protrusio acetabuli. Methods Between 2003 to 2008, 31 patients(35 hips) with protrusio acetabuli were treated with THA, including 16 males (18 hips) and 15 females (17 hips). The age ranged from 36 to 71 years (average age 52.2 years). The femoral heads were moved out with retrograde method when necessary via posterior-lateral hip incision. The acetabular loops and bottoms were prepared respectively. Auto-bone grafting was used to repair acetabular defects and cementless prostheses were planted with press-fit skills. At follow-up visit,the hip functions were evaluated by Harris score. The loosening, re-protrusion and the union of graft bone was judged by X-ray. Results The mean follow-up was 46.5 months (19-152 months). One patient developed DVT on the second day post-operatively who recovered well after anticoagulation treatment. One patient complained of gentle thigh pain which disappeared at 6 months. No other complication was found. The mean Harris scores had improved from 48.9±6.5 pre-operatively to 91.2±5.7 post-operatively. All prostheses acquired bone stabilization with no sign of loosening and re-protrusion and the grafts bone were healed at a mean 6 months according to X-ray. Conclusion THA with acetabular bone grafting and cementless component for protrusio acetabuli have acquired excellent results and prevented loosening and re-protrusio effectively.     

Delayed cementless total hip arthroplasty for neglected dislocation of hip combined with complex acetabular fracture and deficient bone stock

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) for an untreated acetabular fracture is technically challenging and the long-term result is not so favorable. A 45-year-old female patient with untreated column and comminuted posterior wall fracture of the acetabulum was treated in our institution by reconstruction of the posterior wall using iliac strut autograft and plate stabilization of the posterior column with cancellous grafting and cementless THA in a single stage. At 3 years’ follow-up, the patient was independently mobile without limb length discrepancy. Radiological evaluation showed well integrated components and bone grafts. No evidence of aseptic loosening or osteolysis was found. This report aims to emphasize that bony acetabular reconstruction allows the use of primary hip components, which improves prosthesis longevity and preserves bone stock for a future revision.     

颗粒骨打压植骨技术在治疗髋臼骨缺损中的应用

目的介绍颗粒状松质骨打压植骨技术对髋臼骨缺损的重建方法。方法应用该技术对23例髋臼侧假体翻修患者及4例陈旧性髋臼骨折行人工全髋关节置换患者进行植骨,植骨块来源于深低温冰箱梯度降温后的冷冻干燥骨。术后进行临床评估及X线评估。结果术后平均随访3．1年,Harris评分平均提高36分,无1例假体需要再次翻修,有3例在X线上出现髋臼侧透亮带。结论打压植骨技术可以有效治疗髋臼骨缺损,应注重对颗粒松质骨的制备,植骨床的准备及对植骨块的紧密打压和固定。     

全髋关节翻修术中髋臼骨缺损的重建

目的探讨全髋关节置换术（THA）后，翻修术中髋臼骨缺损重建的方法及疗效。方法对81例（84髋）在THA翻修术中处理的髋臼骨缺损患者进行回顾性分析，根据AAOS分型法，Ⅰ型7髋，Ⅱ型56髋，Ⅲ型17髋，Ⅳ型4髋。分别采用大直径非骨水泥假体臼、非骨水泥假体臼＋松质颗粒植骨、骨水泥假体臼＋Cage＋松质颗粒植骨和骨水泥假体臼＋定制型假体＋松质颗粒植骨等方法，对不同类型骨缺损的患者进行修复。术后定期随访，采用Harris方法评估髋关节功能，根据X线片判断假体是否有松动，移植骨是否愈合。结果对本组患者进行术后随访，平均随访45个月（13～118个月）。术后Harris评分平均86．2分，较术前平均改善40．6分。2髋因脱位需进行再翻修，其余效果良好，X线片无假体松动下沉，可见移植骨一宿主骨交界处有连续性小梁骨通过。结论在THA翻修术中，大部分髋臼骨缺损可使用较大型号非骨水泥假体或加松质颗粒植骨进行修复；对于影响假体稳定性的较大缺损，使用骨水泥假体臼＋Cage＋松质颗粒植骨的方法可获得良好效果；定制型假体在处理严重髋臼骨缺损中有独特优势，具有良好的临床应用前景。     

Impaction grafting for acetabular deficiency in total hip arthroplasty for developmental hip dysplasia

The pathological anatomy in neglected developmental dysplasia of the hip often demands some sort of reconstructive surgery to augment the acetabular bone stock during total hip arthroplasty. We have reviewed 11 hips in 10 patients with osteoarthritis secondary to developmental hip dysplasia who underwent cemented total hip arthroplasty using impaction grafting of the acetabulum with a morselized femoral head autograft, to bring the socket down to the anatomical hip center. The mean age at the index procedure was 43.4 years (ranging from 29 to 60 years) and the mean follow-up period was 3.8 years (ranging from 2 to 7 years). Postoperative functional evaluation according to the Merle d'Aubigné and Postel score modified by Charnley revealed very satisfactory results. Radiographic review showed incorporation of all grafts. One socket is radiographically loose. No major complications have been encountered. There have been no reoperations. We believe that acetabular impaction grafting is a valuable alternative in dealing with osteoarthritic hips secondary to developmental hip dysplasia.     

Acetabular bone grafting in primary total hip arthroplasty]

A group of 108 hips in 102 patients (81 females and 21 males; average age: 66.9 years) operated at our Centre between 1989 and 1998 was evaluated. There were 76 hips with idiopathic arthritis, 21 hips with rheumatoid arthritis, 2 hips with post-traumatic lesions and 9 cases of dysplastic arthritis of the hip. Cemented total hip arthroplasty was performed in all cases (62 Weller prostheses, 28 Charnley prostheses, 12 Ultima-Straight prostheses and 6 Centrament prostheses). In the presented material three different kinds of bone grafting were performed: "impaction bone grafting" with autogenous cancellous bone grafts in cases of bone cysts and cavitary lesions (57 cases); augmentation of thin sclerotic or protrusive acetabulums with autogenous cancellous bone grafts with or without allogenous cancellous bone grafts (26 and 16 cases respectively); and reconstruction of the roof of the acetabulum with autogenic cortico-cancellous bone grafts 9 cases). In 17% cases autogenous and allogenous bone grafts were used simultaneously and in 83% autogenous bone grafts only were employed. Acetabular bone grafting was necessary to create proper bone substrate for endoprostheses implantation. Evaluation of results was based on criteria proposed by a joint committee of The Hip Society, SICOT and AAOS. A mean of 83.5% points were achieved in the Harris Hip Score. Aseptic loosening was observed in 15 sockets and 9 stems. Bone grafts didn't heal in 25 hips, of which 14 had loose sockets. These results are comparable to those in primary total hip arthroplasties without acetabular bone grafting. The results in the presented paper support the opinion that acetabular bone grafting is a useful tool in reconstructive surgery of the hip and allows to achieve good results in technically difficult acetabuli.     

应用非骨水泥髋臼或金属髋臼支架行髋关节翻修术的临床研究

目的 评估非骨水泥髋臼及金属髋臼支架加植骨修复髋臼骨缺损的效果.方法 我院自2001年9月至2008年9月应用髋臼翻修支架行髋关节翻修术22例(24髋).其中Lima非骨水泥人工翻修髋臼2例(2髋),Kerboull 支架2例(2髋),GAP 髋臼翻修支架18例(20髋).男性6例(6髋),女性16例(18髋).平均年龄62岁(34～79岁).感染性松动2例(2髋),无菌松动20例(22髋).平均随访时间48个月(18～84个月),对其进行临床和影像学评估.Harris评分术前平均为56分(44～75分).结果 末次随访时22例患者Harris评分平均为89分(78～94分).优良率为95.5%(21/22).三种髋臼翻修支架的外展角满意,髋臼旋转中心基本得到了重建.髋臼翻修支架及其聚氯乙烯臼无明显移位,假体周围无透亮线,髋臼植骨愈合良好.结论 应用非骨水泥髋臼或髋臼支架修复髋臼侧巨大骨缺损,重建了髋臼正常旋转中心、提供了翻修假体的初期稳定性、避免了所植骨在血管化时期的过度机械负重,是翻修髋臼巨大骨缺损的可靠方法.     

Impaction allografting and the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device: 35 hips followed for 3-7 years

Background The incidence of acetabular loosening with segmental and cavitatory bone loss increases as the number of total hips implanted increases. Revisionhip arthroplasty using impacted bone graft and an acetabular reinforcement device is one solution to this problem.

Patients and methodsClinically and radiographically, we assessed 35 hips in 33 patients who had undergone revision hip arthroplasty using impaction grafting and the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device. Mean follow-up was 5 (3-7) years.

Results The mean Mayo score preoperatively was 30, which improved to a mean score of 85. Good to excellent clinical results were seen in 25 patients. The 8 individuals scoring below 80 had significantly more comorbid conditions than the others. No acetabular reconstruction required re-revision. Aseptic loosening occurred in 6 patients. Graft resorption occurred in 5 cases, resulting in inferior hook fracture of the Kerboull device. This was noted at a mean of 13 months after surgery. Further follow-up showed this to be non-progressive, with incorporation of the remaining graft to the host bone. These patients all had good to excellent Mayo hip scores.

Interpretation Early results of revision acetabular surgery using impaction grafting and the Kerboull shell in patients with severe osteolysis have shown good functional outcome. However, 6 of 35 patients had radio-graphic evidence of aseptic loosening without progression for 4 years. Long-term follow-up is required to ensure that this loosening does not result in failure.     

Cancellous impaction bone grafting of acetabular defects in complex primary and revision total hip arthroplasty

The reconstruction of major acetabular bone defects during revision, conversion, and primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) is challenging. We reviewed a consecutive series of 168 THAs (108 revisions, 8 conversions, and 52 primary THAs) performed by 1 surgeon (S.B.G.) between 1997 and 2008 using impaction bone grafting for acetabular reconstruction. Autograft, cancellous allograft croutons, and demineralized bone matrix were used to fill bone defects as needed. The acetabular bone deficiency was classified according to the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons: type I, segmental deficiency with significant rim defect; type II, cavitary defects medially or posteriorly; type III, combined cavitary and segmental deficiency; type IV, pelvic discontinuity; and type V, arthrodesis. According to this method, 56 hips had type I, 31 hips had type II, 48 hips had type III, and 27 hips had type IV deficiencies. Of the 168 patients, 19 subsequently died of causes unrelated to the THA, and 11 were lost to follow-up. All patients had at least 2 years of follow-up. Average Harris Hip Score improved from 45.5±17.9 preoperatively to 81.1±16.5 postoperatively (P<.05) for revision THAs, from 40.0±11.3 preoperatively to 85.0±12.8 postoperatively (P<.05) for conversion THAs, and from 42.3±14.9 preoperatively to 85.0±12.0 postoperatively (P<.05) for primary THAs. All impaction grafted bone (allograft, autograft, or a combination) incorporated radiographically, thus restoring bone stock. Complications included 1 early infection, which was managed successfully with debridement and liner exchange, and 2 late infections that were managed successfully with staged revision. Two revisions required subsequent re-revision for late loosening. Two hip dislocations occurred, 1 of which required surgical treatment to place a constrained liner.     

病灶清除植骨保留髋臼假体的翻修术治疗假体周围局灶性骨溶解

目的 探讨病灶清除植骨保留髋臼假体的翻修术治疗全髋关节置换(total hip arthroplasty,THA)术后稳定固定的髋臼假体周围局灶性骨溶解的疗效.方法 2006年3月至2009年3月,THA术后髋臼假体稳定固定的假体周围局灶性骨溶解患者23例(23髋),男13例,女10例;年龄39～54岁,平均46.6岁.23例均为非骨水泥髋臼.初次THA至诊断髋臼假体周围骨溶解的时间为4.6～7.4年,平均5.5年.术前HarTis髋关节评分74分.手术经腹股沟入路,行髂骨内板开窗,清除髋臼骨溶解病灶、同种异体颗粒骨植骨;经后外侧人路更换聚乙烯内衬、股骨头假体,保留髋臼假体.翻修术后1、3、6、12个月及之后每年随访1次,以髋关节Harris评分评价临床疗效,摄X线片、CT扫描观察植骨区愈合、新发骨溶解病灶及假体移位情况.结果 16例获得随访,随访时间8～38个月,平均28个月.末次随访时Harris髋关节评分86～100分,平均93.8分.16例植骨区成骨均良好,12例植骨区完全被周围骨爬行替代,髋臼假体固定好,无髋臼假体松动及移位,无新发髋臼假体周围骨溶解,无异位骨化、脱位、深静脉血栓形成及感染等并发症.结论 清除病灶植骨、保留髋臼假体、更换聚乙烯内衬和股骨头假体的翻修术可有效减少聚乙烯磨损颗粒产生,避免骨溶解病灶进展导致的假体松动,近期随访结果良好.     

Vancomycin-supplemented impacted bone allografts in infected hip arthroplasty. Two-stage revision results

Bone allografts can store and release high levels of vancomycin. We present our results of a two-stage treatment for infected hip arthroplasty with acetabular and femoral impaction grafting using vancomycin-loaded allografts. We treated 29 patients (30 hips) by removal of the implants, meticulous debridement, parenteral antibiotic therapy and second-stage reconstruction using vancomycin-supplemented impacted bone allografts and a standard, cemented Charnley femoral component. The mean follow-up was 32.4 months (24 to 60). Infection control was obtained in 29 cases (re-infection rate of 3.3%; 95% confidence interval 0.08 to 17) without evidence of progressive radiolucent lines, demarcation or graft resorption. One patient had a further infection ten months after revision caused by a different pathogen. Associated post-operative complications were one traumatic periprosthetic fracture at 14 months, a single dislocation in two hips and four displacements of the greater trochanter. Vancomycin-supplemented allografts restored bone stock and provided sound fixation with a low incidence of further infection.     

Impaction allografting and the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device

Background The incidence of acetabular loosening with segmental and cavitatory bone loss increases as the number of total hips implanted increases. Revisionhip arthroplasty using impacted bone graft and an acetabular reinforcement device is one solution to this problem.

Patients and methodsClinically and radiographically, we assessed 35 hips in 33 patients who had undergone revision hip arthroplasty using impaction grafting and the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device. Mean follow-up was 5 (3–7) years.

Results The mean Mayo score preoperatively was 30, which improved to a mean score of 85. Good to excellent clinical results were seen in 25 patients. The 8 individuals scoring below 80 had significantly more comorbid conditions than the others. No acetabular reconstruction required re-revision. Aseptic loosening occurred in 6 patients. Graft resorption occurred in 5 cases, resulting in inferior hook fracture of the Kerboull device. This was noted at a mean of 13 months after surgery. Further follow-up showed this to be non-progressive, with incorporation of the remaining graft to the host bone. These patients all had good to excellent Mayo hip scores.

Interpretation Early results of revision acetabular surgery using impaction grafting and the Kerboull shell in patients with severe osteolysis have shown good functional outcome. However, 6 of 35 patients had radio-graphic evidence of aseptic loosening without progression for 4 years. Long-term follow-up is required to ensure that this loosening does not result in failure.     

Die Hakendachschale in der Revision schwieriger gelockerter Hüftprothesenpfannen

The long-term results of acetabular revision after total hip arthroplasty (THA) with the use of a reinforcement ring with hook were evaluated. The study included 57 cases of surgery dating back 10 years or more. Of a total of 54 patients (57 operated hips), 18 patients (19 hips) died during the 10-year period and 2 patients (2 hips) were completely lost to follow-up. At the time of the revision surgery, the mean age of the remaining 34 patients (36 hips) was 62.5 years (range: 47-80). A THA revision was done in 25 cases and an acetabular revision only in 11 cases. The most common acetabular defect was a combined segmental and cavitary defect (n = 19), and in three cases there was pelvic discontinuity. Autologous or homologous cancellous bone grafts were used to fill acetabular cavities in 17 hip joints. Structured bone grafts, predominantly homologous bone, were used in ten cases for acetabular reconstruction. At a mean follow-up of 11.4 years (range: 10-14.5) three hip joints (8%) had undergone further revision. The revisions were done for aseptic loosening of the acetabular component in two cases and a septic loosening of both components in one case. Three further cases (8%) revealed signs of acetabular loosening. Two of these three patients were symptomatic but refused further revision surgery. In the 33 unrevised hip joints, a good or excellent clinical result with a d'Aubingé score of more than 14 points was found in 30 cases (92%). Osseous acetabular reconstruction with the use of a reinforcement ring leads to favorable results compared to other techniques. In the authors' opinion, this technique is preferable to those using oversized cups without osseous reconstruction of the acetabulum.     

Acetabular revision with impacted morselized cancellous bone graft and a cemented cup in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: three to fourteen-year follow-up

BACKGROUND: Acetabular revision in patients with rheumatoid arthritis is often difficult because of the poor quality and quantity of the acetabular bone stock. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the midterm clinical and radiographic outcomes of acetabular revision with use of an impaction bone-grafting technique and a cemented polyethylene cup. METHODS: Thirty-five consecutive acetabular revisions were performed with impaction bone-grafting and use of a cemented cup in twenty-eight patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The average age at the revision was fifty-seven years. The minimum duration of follow-up of all reconstructions that were still functioning or that were followed until the time of death was three years (mean, 7.5 years; range, three to fourteen years). No patient was lost to follow-up, but five patients (six hips) died before the time of the review. The acetabular bone defects were classified as cavitary in twelve hips and as combined segmental-cavitary in twenty-three. RESULTS: The five patients (six hips) who died had been doing well at the time of their latest follow-up. Of the remaining patients, six (six hips) had a repeat revision. The average Harris hip score of the living patients with a surviving implant at the time of follow-up was 82 points, and there was no or only mild pain in twenty-one of the twenty-three hips. Radiographic analysis of all twenty-nine hips that had not been revised showed loosening in one hip and a nonprogressive radiolucent line in one zone in two others. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a prosthetic survival rate, with aseptic loosening as the end point, of 90% at eight years. CONCLUSION: Acetabular revision with impaction bone-grafting and a cemented cup in patients with rheumatoid arthritis had acceptable results at an average of 7.5 years postoperatively.     

人工全髋关节置换术中非感染性髋臼骨缺损的治疗策略

目的探讨人工全髋关节置换术在治疗非感染性髋臼骨缺损中的应用。方法 2000年1月至2010年1月间40例非感染性髋臼骨缺损初次行全髋关节置换患者,其中CroweⅢ、Ⅳ型先天性髋关节脱位18例,髋关节感染后融合14例,陈旧性髋臼骨折8例。内移髋关节旋转中心17例,结构性植骨13例,颗粒松质骨打压植骨10例;有14例应用钛网,9例重建钢板,7例加强杯固定。术前术后进行临床评估及X线评估。结果本组手术全部成功,术后无感染发生。本组40例患者随访8～42个月,平均（10.4±2.1）个月,随访时无假体松动,关节无疼痛,患者对手术结果满意,髋关节功能较术前明显改善,术前平均Harris评分为（58.4±6.1）分,术后为（88.6±3.1）分;术后平均Harris评分较术前提高明显,两者比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论对非感染性髋臼节段性和混合性骨缺损进行大块植骨并辅以颗粒骨,并选用牢固的钉板系统固定,将髋臼重建在真臼位置,并尽量采用非骨水泥型臼杯,通过不同的重建方法可以获得良好的髋关节功能。     

Mid-term Follow-up of the Direct Anterior Approach in Acetabular Revision Hip Arthroplasty Using a Reconstruction Cage With Impaction Grafting

BackgroundSevere acetabular bone loss is often treated with reconstruction cages and impaction grafting using allograft bone. Accurate implant positioning is crucial for successful clinical and radiological outcomes. The direct anterior approach (DAA) is a standard approach for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) that is being used more frequently for revision THA. The aim of this study was to report midterm clinical and radiological outcomes of acetabular revision arthroplasty using the DAA to address large acetabular defects by using a reconstruction cage and impaction grafting.MethodsAcetabular cup revisions were performed in 64 patients (64 hips) with severe acetabular bone loss. All patients received reconstruction cages with impaction grafting via the DAA. The stem was also revised in 22 patients. Complications, radiological, and functional outcomes were assessed.ResultsSix of the 64 patients were revised at a mean follow-up of 27.6 months (range, 11-84 months), two each for implant failure, infection, and recurrent dislocation. One hip showed the radiological failure of the implant, but the patient was asymptomatic and was not revised. The median Western Ontario McMasters Osteoarthritis Score (WOMAC) for the cohort overall improved significantly (P < .01) by the latest follow-up compared with preoperative scores.ConclusionGood midterm outcomes can be obtained with the DAA for acetabular cup revisions done to address severe acetabular bone loss by using reconstruction cages and impaction grafting. The number of complications was within the expected range for this type of revision procedure at midterm follow-up, and dislocation rates were low.     

人工全髋关节翻修术中骨缺损的处理

目的研究全髋关节翻修术中骨缺损的处理方法。方法1990年12月至1999年6月对16例一期行金属-聚乙烯假体全髋关节置换术失败患者行全髋关节翻修术。处理髋臼骨缺损的方式包括：（1）髂骨填充骨缺损（3例）,（2）骨水泥填充骨缺损（5例）,（3）异体颗粒骨打压植骨结合金属网重建髋臼（8例）,后两种方式均属骨水泥型。16例行全髋关节翻修术患者全部行髋臼翻修,其中10例同时行股骨柄翻修。所有患者均进行临床和影像学随访。结果所有患者均获得随访,随访时间4．1～7．7年,平均5．9年。Harris评分由全髋关节翻修术前的范围,62-75分,平均68分,升至术后的90—94分,平均91分。随访中均未出现假体旁透亮线、假臼杯水平或垂直移位和骨溶解等征象。共有4例出现并发症,包括异位骨化2例,脱位2例,无一例发生感染。结论有效修复髋臼骨缺损,进行髋部骨性结构的重建,是全髋关节翻修术成败的关键。