Adjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer in the elderly: competing causes of mortality. International Breast Cancer Study Group

Between 1978 and 1981 we conducted a trial in which adjuvant endocrine therapy consisting of tamoxifen (T = 20 mg/d) and low-dose prednisone (p = 7.5 mg/d) for the duration of one year (p + T), was compared with no adjuvant therapy (observation) in 320 women with operable breast cancer aged 66 to 80 years (median age, 70 years). All patients had axillary lymph node metastases after at least a total mastectomy and axillary clearance. At 96 months median follow-up, 9.1% of the patients died without apparent relapse from cancer. An additional 1.9% had a second malignant neoplastic disease (not breast cancer). The 8-year disease-free survival (DFS) percentages (+/- SE) for the p + T and the observation groups were 36% (+/- 4%), and 22% (+/- 3%), (P = .004). The 8-year overall survival percentages were 49% (+/- 4%) and 42% (+/- 4%), respectively (P = .43). We conclude that despite a large proportion of deaths without relapse of breast cancer, a significant advantage for the p + T group in terms of DFS was demonstrated. We hypothesize that an endocrine therapy of longer duration might have an overall survival benefit in a population of elderly patients.     

Good clinical response of breast cancers to neoadjuvant chemoendocrine therapy is associated with improved overall survival.

BACKGROUND: We present extended follow-up from a prospective randomised trial evaluating the role of neoadjuvant chemoendocrine therapy in the treatment of operable breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 309 women were randomised to primary surgery followed by eight cycles of adjuvant mitoxantrone, methotrexate with tamoxifen (2MT) or 2MT with mitomycin-C (3MT) versus the same regimen for four cycles before followed by four cycles after surgery. For this analysis the median follow-up of patients was 112 months. RESULTS: After 10 years follow-up there is still no statistically significant difference in disease-free survival (DFS) (71% versus 71%) or overall survival (OS) (63% versus 70%) when comparing adjuvant versus neoadjuvant treatment, respectively. Of 144 evaluable patients in the neoadjuvant arm, 74 achieved a good clinical response and 70 patients achieved a poor clinical response. Good responders had a superior DFS (80% versus 64%, P=0.01) and OS (77% versus 63%, P=0.03) compared to poor responders. CONCLUSIONS: At 10 years, neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment continue to have equivalent OS and DFS. Good clinical response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with superior DFS and OS. This supports the use of clinical response of primary breast cancer to neoadjuvant therapy as a surrogate marker of survival benefit.     

Postmastectomy radiotherapy in premenopausal Vietnamese and Chinese women with breast cancer treated in an adjuvant hormonal therapy study

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant postmastectomy radiotherapy (RT) decreases the risk of local recurrence of breast cancer and may increase overall survival (OS). METHODS AND MATERIALS: After mastectomy, 656 premenopausal Vietnamese and Chinese women with clinical Stage II-IIIA breast cancer, in a clinical trial of adjuvant surgical oophorectomy and tamoxifen, were treated with adjuvant RT according to the availability in the institution. The short-term disease recurrence and OS experience of these 656 women were analyzed using univariate and multivariate methods. RESULTS: The 193 patients who did not receive RT differed from the 463 who did in that they had larger tumors and more frequently Grade 3 tumors. With a median follow-up of 3.6 years, in univariate analysis, RT was associated with improved disease-free survival (DFS) (relative risk 0.66; 95% confidence interval 0.49-0.89; p = 0.007) and OS (relative risk 0.71; 95% confidence interval 0.50-1.00; p = 0.051). In multivariate analysis, the relative risk for DFS and OS associated with RT was 0.78 and 0.94, respectively (p = not significant for both). Kaplan-Meier estimates showed better 5-year DFS (72% vs. 59%; p = 0.006) and OS (78% vs. 70%; p = 0.05) rates with RT. CONCLUSION: In the absence of detailed CT planning capacity, adjuvant RT for premenopausal Vietnamese women was associated statistically with short-term improvement in DFS and OS in univariate, but not multivariate, analysis.     

Bisphosphonates as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women worldwide. Emerging results from clinical trials in patients with breast cancer suggest that, in addition to preventing cancer treatment-induced bone loss, bisphosphonates may improve disease-free survival (DFS). Although the first adjuvant studies using the early generation oral bisphosphonate clodronate suggested potential reductions in distant recurrence versus placebo in patients with early breast cancer, subsequent results with clodronate were inconsistent, and oral pamidronate produced no disease recurrence benefits versus chemotherapy alone in this setting. In contrast, addition of the newer bisphosphonate zoledronic acid to adjuvant therapy reduced disease recurrence rates and improved DFS compared with adjuvant endocrine therapy alone in two phase 3 studies in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer. Adjuvant zoledronic acid also significantly improved DFS compared with endocrine therapy alone in premenopausal women with breast cancer. Data from ongoing and future trials will further define the role of bisphosphonates in the adjuvant breast cancer setting.     

Mastectomy and oophorectomy by menstrual cycle phase in women with operable breast cancer

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether the phase of the menstrual cycle in which primary surgical treatment occurs influences disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in premenopausal women with breast cancer. We investigated this question in the context of a clinical trial comparing mastectomy alone with mastectomy plus adjuvant oophorectomy and tamoxifen in premenopausal women with operable breast cancer. METHODS: The date of the first day of the last menstrual period (LMP) was used to estimate the phase of the menstrual cycle when the surgeries were done. Follicular phase was defined as day 1-14 from LMP. Luteal phase was defined as day 15-42 from LMP. DFS and OS statistics were determined and analyzed by Cox proportional hazards ratios and Kaplan-Meier methods. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: We analyzed results for 565 women who reported an LMP within 42 days before surgery. For women in the mastectomy only arm (n = 289), there were no differences in DFS or OS by menstrual cycle phase. For women in the adjuvant treatment arm (n = 276), those whose surgery occurred during the luteal phase (n = 158) had better DFS (relative risk [RR] = 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.32 to 0.96; P =.02) and OS (RR = 0.53; 95% CI = 0.30 to 0.95; P =.03) than those whose surgery occurred during the follicular phase (n = 118). Moreover, women whose surgery occurred during the luteal phase and who received adjuvant therapy had better 5-year DFS than did women whose surgery occurred during the follicular phase (84%; 95% CI = 78% to 90% versus 67%; 95% CI = 58% to 78%; P =.02); they also had better OS (85%; 95% CI = 78% to 92% versus 75%; 95% CI = 66% to 84%; P =.03). CONCLUSIONS: The phase of the menstrual cycle at which surgery was done had no impact on survival for women who received mastectomy only. However, women who received a mastectomy and surgical oophorectomy and tamoxifen during the luteal phase had better outcomes than women who received surgery during the follicular phase.     

Adjuvant treatment for early breast cancer: the Ludwig breast cancer studies

The Ludwig Breast Cancer Study Group conducted four concomitant trials involving adjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy. In Ludwig I, adjuvant combination chemotherapy was used with or without prednisone to treat premenopausal and perimenopausal women with metastases in 1-3 axillary lymph nodes. The impact of adding low-dose, continuous prednisone (7.5 mg/day) to an adjuvant, chemotherapy regimen of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) was investigated in a randomized trial of 491 premenopausal and perimenopausal patients with operable breast cancer and metastases in 1-3 axillary lymph nodes. As a consequence of lower hematologic toxicity, a significantly higher dose of CMF could be administered with added prednisone (P less than 0.0001). However, at the 4-year median follow-up, no significant improvement was observed in disease-free survival (DFS) (73% vs. 77%; P = 0.35) or overall survival (OS) (both 86%; P = 0.73). Induced amenorrhea was associated with a longer DFS for younger patients, those who received lower CMF doses, and those with tumors that were estrogen receptor (ER) positive. In Ludwig III, adjuvant therapy was administered to younger postmenopausal women in a study of chemotherapy plus endocrine therapy versus endocrine therapy alone versus mastectomy alone. In this randomized trial of 463 postmenopausal women 65 years of age or younger with axillary node metastases, treatment with the combination of CMF plus low-dose prednisone and tamoxifen (CMFp + T), was compared to endocrine therapy alone (p + T) or to no further treatment after total mastectomy and axillary clearance. At a median follow-up of 4 years, the DFS was 61% for the CMFp + T group, compared with 48% for the p + T group (P = 0.01) and 31% for the observation group (P less than 0.0001). The 4-year OS rates were not statistically different (76%, 67%, and 68%, respectively; P = 0.30). Treatment with CMFp + T reduced local, regional, and distant metastases and was equally effective in improving DFS in patients with ER-positive or ER-negative tumors. In Ludwig II, chemotherapy was given with or without oophorectomy in premenopausal and perimenopausal patients with metastases in 4 or more axillary nodes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Aromatase inhibitor plus ovarian suppression as adjuvant therapy in premenopausal women with breast cancer

The goal of adjuvant hormonal therapy for breast cancer is to prevent recurrence by eradicating micrometastatic disease. Recent studies have shown that the use of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) as adjuvant therapy improves outcomes for postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer compared to adjuvant endocrine therapy with tamoxifen alone. The research question has been raised whether AIs would have similar improvements in disease-free survival (DFS) in premenopausal women with ER-positive breast cancer. Combining 2 phase 3 clinical trials (n = 4,690), Pagani and colleagues randomized premenopausal women with ER-positive early breast cancer to exemestane plus ovarian suppression or tamoxifen plus ovarian suppression for a period of 5 y. After a median follow-up of 68 months, DFS was 91.1% in the AI group and 87.3% in the tamoxifen group. In premenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive early breast cancer, adjuvant treatment with exemestane plus ovarian suppression, as compared with tamoxifen plus ovarian suppression, significantly reduced recurrence.     

Oophorectomy and tamoxifen adjuvant therapy in premenopausal Vietnamese and Chinese women with operable breast cancer.

PURPOSE: In 1992, the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group reported that a meta-analysis of six randomized trials in European and North American women begun from 1948 to 1972 demonstrated disease-free and overall survival benefit from adjuvant ovarian ablation. Approximately 350,000 new cases of breast cancer are diagnosed annually in premenopausal Asian women who have lower levels of estrogen than western women. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1993 to 1999, we recruited 709 premenopausal women with operable breast cancer (652 from Vietnam, 47 from China) to a randomized clinical trial of adjuvant oophorectomy and tamoxifen (20 mg orally every day) for 5 years or observation and this combined hormonal treatment on recurrence. At later dates estrogen- and progesterone-receptor protein assays by immunohistochemistry were performed for 470 of the cases (66%). RESULTS: Treatment arms were well balanced. With a median follow-up of 3.6 years, there have been 84 events and 69 deaths in the adjuvant treatment group and 127 events and 91 deaths in the observation group, with 5-year disease-free survival rates of 75% and 58% (P =.0003 unadjusted; P =.0075 adjusted), and overall survival rates of 78% and 70% (P =.041 unadjusted) for the adjuvant and observation groups, respectively. Only patients with hormone receptor-positive tumors benefited from the adjuvant treatment. In Vietnam, for women unselected for hormone receptor status, a cost-effectiveness analysis suggests that this intervention costs $350 per year of life saved. CONCLUSION: Vietnamese and Chinese women with hormone receptor-positive operable breast cancer benefit from adjuvant treatment with surgical oophorectomy and tamoxifen.     

High p27Kip1 expression predicts superior relapse-free and overall survival for premenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer receiving adjuvant treatment with tamoxifen plus goserelin.

PURPOSE: To determine the predictive value of p27Kip1 in premenopausal women with early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively examined tumor specimens from 512 patients with breast cancer who were enrolled onto Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG) Trial 5. In this trial, premenopausal, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients with stage I and II disease were randomly assigned to receive either 5 years of tamoxifen plus 3 years of goserelin or six cycles of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil. p27Kip1 expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry, and its association with clinical outcome was determined. Statistical analyses were performed to test for interaction between p27Kip1 status and treatment. RESULTS: High p27Kip1 expression (nuclear p27Kip1 staining in >/= 50% of tumor cells) independently predicted superior relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in both the total study population (RFS: relative risk [RR], 0.53; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.82; P =.004; OS: RR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.58; P <.001) and patients treated with combination endocrine therapy (RFS: RR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.63; P =.001; OS: RR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.53; P =.003). The interaction between p27Kip1 expression and treatment was statistically significant for RFS (P =.04) but not for OS (P =.27). CONCLUSION: High p27Kip1 expression was an independent predictor of responsiveness to hormonal therapy and thus may be useful for the selection of premenopausal women with early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer for adjuvant combination endocrine therapy.     

Adoption and effectiveness of de-escalated radiation and endocrine therapy strategies for older women with low-risk breast cancer

PurposeRecent clinical trials support de-escalation of adjuvant radiation therapy following lumpectomy in some older women with low-risk HR+ breast cancers planning to take endocrine therapy. The adoption of these findings into clinical practice, and the effectiveness of de-escalated therapy in real-world populations, remain under investigation.Materials and methodsWe evaluated use of adjuvant radiation therapy and/or endocrine therapy among older women with T1-2 node-negative, HR+ breast cancer in the United States between 2007 and 2011. The study included patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare linked database and the North Carolina Cancer Information and Population Health Resource database.ResultsRadiation therapy was received by 65.5% of patients, with no decrease over time. Older women and those with T2 (compared to T1) tumors were less likely to receive radiation therapy. In propensity-adjusted analyses, both radiation therapy alone (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.67–0.84) and radiation + endocrine therapy (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.54–0.69) were associated with significantly lower recurrence risk compared to endocrine therapy alone. Non-adherence to endocrine therapy was common (37%) and similar across groups. With a median follow-up of 48 months (range 13–84), we were not able to detect an association of non-adherence with recurrence risk in endocrine therapy-containing treatment arms.ConclusionMost older women with stage I HR+ breast cancers continue to receive radiation, at higher rates than patients with node-negative stage II tumors. These findings suggest that while multiple evidence-based treatment options exist in these patients, improvements are needed to ensure that radiation therapy is applied equitably and rationally.     

Adjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in women with rapidly proliferating node-negative breast cancer

This prospective clinical trial was designed to assess the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy in women with rapidly proliferating node-negative breast cancer. This group has been predicted to have a 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) of 70% without adjuvant chemotherapy. In this study, 449 women with rapidly proliferating breast cancer (91% measured by S-phase fraction and 9% by histochemistry) received adjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) plus tamoxifen for estrogen receptor-positive or progesterone receptor-positive cancer. The 5-year DFS was 90% (+/- 2%) and the 5-year overall survival was 94% (+/- 1%). At a median follow-up of 62 months, the strategy of administering 6 cycles of AC to women with T2 N0 cancer and 3 cycles in those with smaller T1 N0 cancers appeared to eliminate tumor size as a potential prognostic factor. Adjuvant chemotherapy with AC appears effective in reducing recurrence rates for women with rapidly proliferating node-negative breast cancer.     

Profile of prognostic factors in 1022 Indian women with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy

PURPOSE: The outcome of breast cancer treatment can vary in different geographic and ethnic groups. A multivariate analysis was performed for various prognostic factors in 1022 Indian women with pathologic Stage I-II breast cancer treated between 1980 and 2000 with standard breast-conserving therapy with or without systemic adjuvant therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: At a mean follow-up of 53 months, the outcomes studied were local failure, locoregional failure, and distant failure, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: The median pathologic tumor size was 3 cm (range, 1-5 cm), and axillary lymph node metastasis was present in 39% of women. The actuarial 5- and 10-year OS and DFS rate was 87% and 77% and 76% and 68%, respectively. Lymphovascular emboli or invasion (LVI) was the strongest independent adverse factor for all failure and survival (local failure, hazard ratio 2.85; 95% confidence interval, 1.68-4.83; OS; hazard ratio, 2.01, 95% confidence interval, 1.35-2.99). Lymph node metastasis was also an independent adverse factor for local failure, locoregional failure, distant failure, DFS, and OS (hazard ratio, 1.55, 95% confidence interval, 1.04-2.30). Age < or =40 years increased the incidence of local recurrence, and patients with inner quadrant tumors had inferior DFS. The incidence of LVI was significantly greater in women with lymph node metastases than in node-negative women (p < 0.001) and in women with Grade 3 tumors than in those with Grade 1 or 2 tumors (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: In Indian women, LVI was the strongest independent prognostic factor for OS, DFS, and local recurrence, irrespective of nodal status and systemic adjuvant treatment. Although LVI may not be a contraindication for BCT, as has been proposed by certain groups, it is necessary to define its role in prospective studies in determining local and systemic treatment.     

Identification of early breast cancer patient cohorts who may benefit from lapatinib therapy

In resource-constrained environments many patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)+ early breast cancer are currently not offered adjuvant anti-HER2 therapy. For patients who might be able to receive the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) lapatinib (e.g. after patent expiration), it is important to identify subgroups of patients for whom anti-HER2 TKI therapy could be beneficial.To do this, we used data from 2489 patients with centrally confirmed HER2+ disease enrolled in the adjuvant Tykerb Evaluation After Chemotherapy (TEACH) trial, investigating the effect of lapatinib in patients with HER2+ early breast cancer not treated with trastuzumab. We performed subgroup analyses and number-needed-to-treat (NNT) calculations using patient and tumour associated predictors.Hormone receptor negative (HR−) patients on lapatinib had a significantly prolonged disease-free survival (DFS) compared to HR− patients on placebo (hazard ratio 0.64, P = 0.003). For patients with HR– disease, starting treatment with lapatinib ≤1 year from diagnosis improved DFS by 12.1% [2.1–22.1] at 2 years and 15.7% [4.1–27.2] at 5 years. Depending on lymph node status and time since diagnosis the NNT for recurrence (at 5 years) was between 5.9 (node positive patients <1 year from diagnosis) and 15.9. These numbers are in range with numbers reported for up-front adjuvant trastuzumab for HR unselected patients (e.g. 15.6 for DFS at 4 years in HERA).In a subgroup analysis of the adjuvant TEACH trial, we show that anti-HER2 monotherapy with a TKI is beneficial as adjuvant therapy in a subgroup of patients. NNT in HER2+ HR– patients are in range with those reported from up-front adjuvant trastuzumab trials.     

Hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha expression predicts a poor response to primary chemoendocrine therapy and disease-free survival in primary human breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha (HIF-1alpha) tumor expression in predicting the response to epirubicin and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with breast cancer enrolled in a single institution trial of primary anthracycline and tamoxifen therapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The expression of HIF-1alpha was assessed by immunohistochemistry in 187 patients with T(2-4) N(0-1) breast cancer enrolled in a randomized trial comparing four cycles of single agent epirubicin versus epirubicin + tamoxifen as primary systemic treatment. All patients postoperatively received four cycles of the four weekly i.v. CMF regimen (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil). Patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive primary tumors also underwent 5 years of treatment with adjuvant tamoxifen. Carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) was also scored as a marker of HIF activity. RESULTS: Overall response to therapy progressively decreased with increasing tumor HIF-1alpha (P < 0.05), and HIF-1alpha was an independent predictor of response (P < 0.048). HIF-1alpha expression was also associated with a significantly shorter DFS (P < 0.02) in all patients and in ER-positive but not in ER-negative patients. Furthermore, CAIX positivity conferred a significantly shorter DFS (P = 0.02) compared with CAIX-negative tumors in patients with HIF-1alpha-negative tumors. CONCLUSIONS: HIF-1alpha expression in patients with breast cancer is a marker of poor therapy response and outcome, especially in ER-positive patients. The combination of two hypoxia markers has greater utility than assessing just one, and patients with hypoxia markers in their tumors may be suitable for administration of drugs that reduce HIF-1alpha expression and increase oxygen delivery to the tumor bed before starting neoadjuvant therapies.     

Burdens and benefits of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil and tamoxifen for elderly patients with breast cancer: the International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial VII.

PURPOSE: Information on the tolerability and efficacy of adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy for older women is limited. We studied these issues using the data collected as part of the International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial VII. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Postmenopausal women with operable, node-positive breast cancer were randomized to receive either tamoxifen alone for 5 years (306 patients) or tamoxifen plus three consecutive cycles of classical cyclophosphamide (100 mg/m(2) orally days 1 to 14), methotrexate (40 mg/m(2) intravenous days 1 and 8), and fluorouracil (600 mg/m(2) intravenous days 1 and 8) every 28 days (CMF; 302 patients). The median follow-up was 8.0 years. RESULTS: Among the 299 patients who received at least one dose of CMF, women 65 years of age or older (n = 76) had higher grades of toxicity compared with women less than 65 years old (n = 223) (P =.004). More women in the older age group compared with the younger women experienced grade 3 toxicity of any type (17% v 7%, respectively), grade 3 hematologic toxicity (9% v 5%, respectively), and grade 3 mucosal toxicity (4% v 1%, respectively). Older patients also received less than their expected CMF dose compared with younger postmenopausal women (P =.0008). The subjective burdens of treatment, however, were similar for younger and older patients based on quality-of-life measures (performance status, coping, physical well-being, mood, and appetite). For older patients, the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 63% for CMF plus tamoxifen and 61% for tamoxifen alone (hazards ratio [HR], 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65 to 1.52; P =.99). For younger patients, the corresponding 5-year DFS rates were 61% and 53% (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.91; P =.008), but the test for heterogeneity of CMF effect according to age group was not statistically significant. The reduced effectiveness of CMF among older women could not be attributed to dose reductions according to dose received. CONCLUSION: CMF tolerability and effectiveness were both reduced for older patients compared with younger postmenopausal node-positive breast cancer patients who received tamoxifen for 5 years. The development and evaluation of less toxic and more effective chemotherapy regimens are required for high-risk elderly patients.     

The role of irradiation of the internal mammary lymph nodes in high-risk stage II to IIIA breast cancer patients after high-dose chemotherapy: a prospective sequential nonrandomized study.

PURPOSE: This phase II single-institution prospective, nonrandomized trial investigates high-dose adjuvant chemotherapy and locoregional radiotherapy in patients with breast cancer. We compared the outcome of patients in this study treated with radiotherapy fields including the internal mammary nodes (IMN) to a group of patients who did not receive IMN irradiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 100 patients with high-risk stage II-III breast cancer received doxorubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy, stem-cell support, and locoregional radiotherapy. The radiotherapy included electron-beam irradiation to the IMN. For 20 months during the study, no electron-beam facility was available and we were unable to deliver the IMN irradiation as planned to 33 patients. The remaining 67 patients (32 treated before and 35 treated after this period) received IMN irradiation. Patients with receptor-positive tumors received tamoxifen for 5 years. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 77 months for all of the patients, disease-free survival (DFS) was significantly prolonged in patients receiving IMN radiation compared to those without IMN radiation (73% v 52%; P =.02). A trend was seen for overall survival (OS; 78% v 64%; P =.08). Cox regression multivariate analysis found IMN radiotherapy to be significant both for DFS and OS. Estrogen receptor positivity was also significant for DFS. There was no treatment related mortality. CONCLUSION: In patients with high-risk stage II to III breast cancer, the inclusion of the IMN in the radiotherapy field was associated with a statistically significant increase in DFS and a borderline increase in OS.     

Prognostic significance of tumor grade in clinical trials of adjuvant therapy for breast cancer with axillary lymph node metastasis

The prognostic significance of histologic tumor grade has been evaluated in 1537 women entered into the Ludwig Trials I-IV of adjuvant therapy for node-positive breast cancer. Tumor grade was determined on histologic review of primary tumor sections by two central review pathologists using a modification of the Bloom and Richardson grading system. The 5-year overall survival rates (+/- SE) were: Grade 1, 86% +/- 2; Grade 2, 70% +/- 2; and Grade 3, 57% +/- 2 (P less than 0.0001). This survival difference was seen in both premenopausal (P less than 0.0001) and postmenopausal (P less than 0.0001) women. Significant differences in disease-free survival (DFS) by tumor grade were also observed (P less than 0.0001). The tumor grade determined by the 75 contributing local clinic pathologists was also highly significant for predicting DFS and overall survival. Tumor grade remained a statistically significant prognostic factor for DFS (P less than 0.0001) and overall survival (P less than 0.0001) in multivariate analyses controlling for nodal status, tumor size, estrogen receptor status, menopausal status, age, peritumoral vessel invasion, and treatment assigned. In postmenopausal patients for whom adjuvant treatment was compared with no adjuvant therapy, the prognostic significance of tumor grade was modified by the effect of treatment. The presence of vessel invasion by primary tumor cells was a stronger predictor of early recurrence than was increasing tumor grade in postmenopausal patients who received no adjuvant therapy. The higher failure rates for patients with high-grade tumors was due to a larger number of failures in regional and visceral sites. Tumor grade can be determined by any pathologist and allows for selection of a subpopulation of breast cancer patients at high risk for early mortality.     

Prognostic factors in patients with isolated recurrences of breast cancer (stage IV-NED)

Background: One to 10% of women with metastatic breast cancer have a recurrence of their disease as an isolated lesion (local, regional, or distant) which may be treated by surgical resection, irradiation, or both. These are patients with stage IV breast cancer with no evidence of disease, or stage IV-NED. Because natural history and prognostic factors for patients with stage IV-NED are poorly determined, we decided to evaluate a group of patients with stage IV-NED treated at a single institution.Patients and methods: Ninety-six patients with isolated recurrence of stage IV breast cancer were analyzed retrospectively. Treatment of loco-regional or distant recurrence was surgery in 18 patients and surgery plus irradiation in 78 patients. Seventy-nine patients received systemic therapy after loco-regional treatment (24 chemotherapy and 55 hormonotherapy). Prognostic factors were analyzed and correlated with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).Results: Five-year DFS and OS for the whole group were 29% and 49% respectively. On the univariate analysis, patients without axillary nodal involvement at the time of mastectomy had significantly greater 5-year DFS and OS than patients with nodal involvement (51% vs. 14% and 70% vs. 34% respectively, p< 0.05). DFS was also significantly better for patients receiving systemic therapy after local treatment (31% vs. 19%). On the multivariate analysis, absence of nodal involvement and systemic therapy were associated with longer DFS (p = 0.044 and p = 0.008, respectively) and OS (p = 0.009 and p = 0.011, respectively). None of the other factors analyzed including menopausal status, T-stage, number of involved nodes, receptor status, adjuvant therapy, sites of first recurrence, or time from mastectomy to first recurrence had a predictive value for DFS and OS.Conclusion: Patients with stage IV-NED have poor prognosis due to early development of metastatic disease. Absence of axillary nodal involvement at the time of mastectomy and systemic therapy following local management is associated with improved DFS and OS. These results suggest that systemic therapy after local treatment in stage IV-NED is indicated. Poor prognosis in patients with previous nodal involvement warrants new approaches.     

Role of the estrogen receptor coactivator AIB1 (SRC-3) and HER-2/neu in tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer

BACKGROUND: AIB1 (SRC-3) is an estrogen receptor (ER) coactivator that, when overexpressed in cultured cells, can reduce the antagonist activity of tamoxifen-bound ERs. Signaling through the HER-2 receptor pathway activates AIB1 by phosphorylation. To determine whether high AIB1 expression alone or together with HER-2 reduces the effectiveness of tamoxifen in breast cancer patients, we quantified expression of AIB1 and HER-2 in tumors from breast cancer patients with long-term clinical follow-up who received either no adjuvant therapy or adjuvant tamoxifen therapy after breast cancer surgery. METHODS: AIB1 and HER-2 protein levels in tumors from 316 breast cancer patients were determined using western blot analysis. Molecular variables (e.g., expression of AIB1, ER, progesterone receptor, p53, Bcl-2), tumor characteristics, and patient outcome were assessed using Spearman rank correlation. Disease-free survival (DFS) curves were derived from Kaplan-Meier estimates, and the curves were compared by log-rank tests. The effect of AIB1 on DFS adjusted for other prognostic factors was assessed by multivariable analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: High AIB1 expression in patients not receiving adjuvant tamoxifen therapy was associated with better prognosis and longer DFS (P =.018, log-rank test). In contrast, for patients who did receive tamoxifen therapy, high AIB1 expression was associated with worse DFS (P =.049, log-rank test), which is indicative of tamoxifen resistance. The test for interaction between AIB1 expression and tamoxifen therapy was statistically significant (P =.004). When expression of AIB1 and HER-2 were considered together, patients whose tumors expressed high levels of both AIB1 and HER-2 had worse outcomes with tamoxifen therapy than all other patients combined (P =.002, log-rank test). CONCLUSIONS: The antitumor activity of tamoxifen in patients with breast cancer may be determined, in part, by tumor levels of AIB1 and HER-2. Thus, AIB1 may be an important diagnostic and therapeutic target.     

Breast conservation therapy for invasive breast cancer in Ashkenazi women with BRCA gene founder mutations

BACKGROUND: Germline mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. Whether women with breast cancer who have inherited mutations in these genes have a different outcome after breast conservation therapy than women with "sporadic" cancer is unresolved. Consequently, we compared the outcomes after breast conservation therapy in Ashkenazi women with or without germline mutations in BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 (hereafter called BRCA). METHODS: We studied 305 women of Ashkenazi Jewish descent undergoing breast-conserving treatment for 329 invasive breast cancers. We reviewed their clinical records, retrieved their archival tissue samples, and tested those samples for the founder mutations BRCA1 185delAG, BRCA1 5382insC, and BRCA2 6174delT. Genetic results were linked to clinical data and outcomes by univariate and multivariate analyses. All Pvalues are two-sided. RESULTS: We detected mutations in BRCA genes in 28 of 305 women. Women with BRCA mutations were more likely to be diagnosed with cancer before the age of 50 years (P<.001) and to have lymph node involvement (P =.04). Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence was more common in women with BRCA mutations, although this did not reach statistical significance (relative risk [RR] = 1.79; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.64-5.03). Women with mutations were more likely to develop contralateral breast cancer (RR = 3.50; 95% CI = 1.78-8.74; P =.001). Distant disease-free survival was shorter in women with mutations (66.2% versus 84.3% at 10 years; P =.05), as was breast cancer-specific survival (71.9% versus 87.2% at 10 years; P =.02). Tumor stage and nodal status, but not mutation status, were predictive of distant disease-free and breast cancer-specific survival in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Women with BRCA founder mutations are at increased risk for breast cancer-related events after breast conservation. However, mutation status is not an independent predictor of survival and should not influence decisions regarding adjuvant therapy. The increased contralateral breast cancer risk in women heterozygous for BRCA mutations mandates careful surveillance.