Lepirudin for therapeutic use in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) type II is an antibody mediated severe adverse event to heparin with a paradoxical decrease of platelet count and an increased risk for thromboembolic complications. The antibodies are directed against a neoepitop of platelet factor 4 after its binding to heparin. The incidence of HIT type II is lower with low-molecular-weight heparin compared to unfractionated heparin and lower in not operated patients compared to those after major surgery. In patients with HIT type II alternative anticoagulation has to be performed immediately due to the high thrombogenicity of the antibodies. The recombinant hirudin lepirudin (Refludan) is the anticoagulant drug of choice. A long-term anticoagulation has to be performed depending on the concomitant risk factors, intravenous administration followed by subcutaneous lepirudin overlapping with vitamin K antagonists.     

False-positive tests for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome and systemic lupus erythematosus

Summary.  Background : Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a severe complication of heparin therapy that can be associated with arterial or venous thrombosis and is caused by antibodies against platelet factor 4 (PF4)–heparin complex. Patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) have been reported with positive tests for PF4–heparin complex antibodies by antigen assay. Whether such patients can be treated with heparin is a dilemma. Objectives : To determine the incidence and nature of the HIT immune reaction in patients with APS and/or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods : Antibodies against PF4–heparin complex were assayed by particle gel immunoassay (PaGIA), or enzyme immunoassay (EIA) with or without an excess of heparin. EIA for PF4 alone was also performed. Functional assays for HIT, that is, heparin-induced platelet activation (HIPA) and heparin-induced platelet aggregation, were also performed. Results : In 32 of 42 patients (76.2%) with APS, APS and SLE, SLE, or SLE with antiphospholipid antibodies, EIA IgG or PaGIA for PF4–heparin complex antibodies were positive. Of these 32 samples, 26 (81.3%) tested positive for anti-PF4 antibodies. All 24 samples that were positive for PF4–heparin complex by EIA IgG were also positive for EIA IgG in the presence of heparin excess, and all were negative by the HIPA and heparin-induced platelet aggregation tests. Conclusion : A large proportion of patients with APS and/or SLE give false-positive HIT antigen test results that are presumably related to autoantibodies against PF4, which can be distinguished from true HIT antibodies by EIA for PF4–heparin complexes tested with heparin excess, and by functional assays.     

Determinants of donor platelet variability when testing for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is a common immune-mediated drug reaction that can be complicated by life-threatening arterial thrombosis. The diagnosis can be confirmed by demonstrating heparin-dependent release of radiolabeled serotonin from washed normal platelets in the presence of patient serum. However, certain serum samples from these patients produce 14C-serotonin release from some but not other normal donor platelets. We investigated this problem of donor platelet variability by studying the reactivities of 10 serum samples from patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with platelets from 10 normal donors (100 serum and platelet combinations). We observed a marked variability in reactivity for patient serum and platelets from normal donors; this initially appeared random. However, closer examination indicated that the reactivities varied hierarchically. Because heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is caused by binding of heparin-dependent IgG to platelet Fc receptors, we examined whether platelet Fc receptor number or function explained the variability in platelet reactivity. We observed that platelet Fc receptor function, as measured by platelet release associated with heat-aggregated IgG, was highly correlated with platelet reactivity to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia serum samples. No significant correlation, however, was found between Fc receptor number and platelet response. Reaction of murine monoclonal antibodies that activate human platelets by means of the platelet Fc receptors was not predictive of platelet reactivity to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia serum.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Antibodies from patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia/thrombosis are specific for platelet factor 4 complexed with heparin or bound to endothelial cells.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia/thrombosis (HITP) is thought to be mediated by immunoglobulins that activate platelets in the presence of pharmacologic concentrations of heparin, but the molecular basis for this relatively common and often serious complication of heparin therapy has not been established. We found that plasma from each of 12 patients with HITP contained high titer (> or = 1:200) antibodies that reacted with immobilized complexes of heparin and platelet factor 4 (PF4), a heparin-binding protein contained in platelet alpha-granules. Recombinant human PF4 behaved similarly to PF4 isolated from platelets in this assay system. Complexes formed at an apparent heparin/PF4 molecular ratio of approximately 1:2 (fresh heparin) and approximately 1:12 (outdated heparin) were most effective in binding antibody. Immune complexes consisting of PF4, heparin, and antibody reacted with resting platelets; this interaction was inhibited by a monoclonal antibody specific for the Fc gamma RII receptor and by excess heparin. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells, known to express heparin-like glycosaminoglycan molecules on their surface, were recognized by antibody in the presence of PF4 alone; this reaction was inhibited by excess heparin, but not by anti-Fc gamma RII. Antibodies reactive with heparin/PF4 were not found in normal plasma, but IgG and IgM antibodies were detected at dilutions of 1:10 (IgG) and 1:50 (IgM) in 3 of 50 patients (6%) with other types of immune thrombocytopenia. These findings indicate that antibodies associated with HITP react with PF4 complexed with heparin in solution or with glycosaminoglycan molecules on the surface of endothelial cells and provide the basis for a new hypothesis to explain the development of thrombocytopenia with thrombosis or disseminated intravascular coagulation in patients sensitive to heparin.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Although adverse reactions to heparin are rare and usually quickly reversible, recent studies have reported a potentially more serious complication occurring in up to 30 percent of patients receiving heparin. This phenomenon, known as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, is believed to be of two distinct types that differ in etiology, clinical onset, and therapeutic ramifications. The most common type is characterized by a mild, transient drop in the platelet count on the second or third day of heparin therapy that generally reverses itself with continued heparin administration. The second type is believed to be the consequence of an immune mechanism or heparin-dependent antibody and may be life-threatening because of an associated thrombosis known as white clot syndrome. This type occurs on the fourth to eighth day of heparin therapy and is signaled by declining platelet count and/or increasing resistance to heparin therapy and eventual development of a clot composed almost entirely of fibrin and platelet aggregates. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is significant in that it is not related to age, sex, blood type, or amount of heparin administered. Because of the absence of known risk factors, all patients receiving heparin should be considered at risk for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

A summary of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is presented. HIT is an adverse drug reaction characterized by thrombocytopenia and a high risk for venous or arterial thrombosis. The frequency of HIT ranges from 1 to 5% of patients receiving heparin with exact frequencies ranging between specific agents. Interestingly, this immune-mediated syndrome is ironically associated with thrombosis, not bleeding, with thrombin formation playing a major role. It is caused by heparin-dependent, platelet-activating antibodies that identifies a self-protein, PF4, bound to heparin that results in an antibody formation. The resulting platelet activation is associated with increased thrombin generation. Typically, the platelet count fall begins 5–10 days after starting heparin, although a rapid platelet count fall can occur in a patient who has antibodies from recent heparin use. Typical causes of HIT as well as the best diagnostic studies and treatment are discussed in this review. HIT was reviewed using a pubmed? search; google scholar? using key words: “Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia”; “heparin”, and “drug AND thrombocytopenia.”     

Testing for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia antibodies

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) has a distinct clinical profile and unique pathogenesis. It is caused by platelet-activating IgG antibodies that recognize multimolecular complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) bound to heparin or certain other polyanions. Although an immune response to PF4/heparin associated with heparin treatment is very common, clinical HIT occurs only among the minority of patients whose antibodies are capable of strongly activating platelets. This explains why certain platelet activation assays and anti-PF4/polyanion immunoassays have high sensitivity for HIT and why diagnostic specificity is highest for those assays that preferentially detect pathogenic antibodies, such as the washed platelet activation assays or immunoassays that detect only IgG antibodies. Negative results obtained in a solid-phase PF4/polyanion immunoassay generally exclude HIT (high negative predictive value), especially in a setting of a low pretest probability. In addition, because the magnitude of a positive test result correlates with greater likelihood of HIT, a Bayesian diagnostic approach that combines pretest probability and the magnitude of a positive test result is recommended. Recent studies suggest that presence of anti-PF4/polyanion antibodies in certain clinical settings confers an adverse prognosis, even without clinically evident HIT. Whether such antibodies impart "forme fruste" HIT or are simply a surrogate marker for a non-HIT adverse risk factor such as inflammation is unresolved.     

Immune mechanisms in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: no evidence for immunoglobulin M anti-idiotype antibodies

BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), which is caused by platelet (PLT)-activating immunoglobulin (Ig)G antibodies against platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin complexes, differs from other immune responses seen in immunohematology: IgG antibodies are formed as early as 5 days even without previous heparin exposure; antibodies are remarkably transient (<100 days); HIT is more frequent in postsurgery patients compared with medical patients despite administering the same type and dose of heparin; and increasing evidence implicates autoantibody-like reactivity of anti-PF4/heparin antibodies. We hypothesized that these unusual features could be caused by loss of regulatory anti-idiotype IgM antibodies due to disturbance (e.g., by surgery) of an idiotype–anti-idiotype network.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Sera were obtained prospectively before heparin administration and during the immunization phase of HIT and also from patients with previous HIT after waning of antibodies to nondetectable levels. To detect inhibitory IgM anti-idiotype antibodies, we performed serum coincubation experiments and IgG purification by protein G and size filtration to exclude coprecipitating IgM. Sera (n = 3) containing known anti-PF4/heparin IgG or IgM antibodies and normal sera (n = 20) were processed as controls.
RESULTS: Fifteen preimmune response sera (seroconverting in the PF4/heparin-IgG enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay only [n = 4] or additionally in a PLT activation assay [n = 5] or in both assays plus thrombosis [n = 6]) and four sera of previously immunized patients were included. Neither did the neat sera inhibit binding of anti-PF4/heparin antibodies nor did the purified IgG fractions show enhanced binding to PF4/heparin complexes.
CONCLUSION: The atypical immunologic features of HIT do not appear to be caused by disruption of an idiotype (IgG)–anti-idiotype (IgM) network.     

Heparin is not required for detection of antibodies associated with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia/thrombosis.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), with or without thrombosis, is a common and often serious complication of heparin therapy. Platelet-activating, heparin-induced antibodies characteristic of HIT are thought to be specific for complexes formed between platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin, and such complexes are routinely used for antibody detection. We studied the binding of HIT antibodies to PF4 complexed with heparin fractions of uniform molecular size or linear polyanions other than heparin and found that many compounds other than heparin form complexes with PF4 that are suitable for antibody detection, provided they carry strong negative charges spaced about 0.5 nm apart along the molecular backbone and are of sufficient length to span about 40% of the circumference of the PF4 tetramer. Polyvinyl phosphonate was among the compounds that were equivalent to heparin. Thus neither a polysaccharide chain nor sulfate side groups--the hallmarks of heparin structure--are required for HIT antibody detection. The findings support the view that antibodies associated with HIT are specific for conformational changes that take place in the positively charged PF4 molecule when it reacts with a suitable, linear polyanion.     

Thrombosis and hemorrhage in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in seriously ill patients

Objective Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is the most common form of drug-induced immune-mediated thrombocytopenia. HIT may be aggravated by life-threatening arterial and venous thrombosis and, to a lesser extent, hemorrhagic complications. We investigated the incidence of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications in critically ill patients with the multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and HIT.Design Case-control study.Setting A 33-bed general intensive care unit in a university-affiliated teaching hospital.Patients Twenty consecutive patients with laboratory-proven HIT compared with 20 contemporary, consecutive patients without HIT.Interventions Unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin were replaced by danaparoid sodium in patients with HIT.Measurements and results Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia was proven by a positive platelet aggregation test. The HIT group consisted of 14 males and 6 females aged 65.2±10.8 years (mean ± standard deviation) with APACHE II scores of 26.7±5.4. Thrombocytopenia less than 100×10⁹/l developed within 6.4±7.0 days. In 12 patients thrombocytopenia resolved after discontinuation of unfractionated heparin in 8.8±6.4 days. Arterial and venous thromboembolic complications occurred more frequently in HIT patients than in non-HIT patients (10/20 (50%) versus 0/20 (0%); chi-square p<0.001). Hemorrhagic complications also occurred more frequently in HIT patients than in non-HIT patients (17/20 (85%) versus 7/20 (35%); chi-square p=0.001).Conclusion In critically ill patients with HIT, the incidence of thromboembolic complications and hemorrhagic complications was remarkably high.Electronic Supplementary Material Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-004-2334-1     

IgG classification of anti-PF4/heparin antibodies to identify patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia during mechanical circulatory support

Commercial immunoassays frequently detect anti-PF4/heparin antibodies during mechanical circulatory support (MCS), but only a small minority of patients develops heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Whereas platelet functional tests can distinguish between platelet-activating and non-platelet-activating antibodies, commercial PF4-dependent immunoassays do not. Between 2003 and 2004, 113 patients were placed on MCS. Blood samples were obtained on postimplant day 5-7 for analyses by antibody assays and the functional heparin-induced platelet activation (HIPA) assay. Three distinct groups of patient sera were identified: platelet-activating anti-PF4/heparin antibodies (n = 10), non-platelet-activating anti-PF4/heparin antibodies (n = 53), and anti-PF4/heparin antibody negative (n = 50). Patients with platelet-activating antibodies had the highest risk for thromboembolic events (P < 0.005), whereas those with non-platelet-activating antibodies did not differ from antibody negative patients (P = 0.369). The enzyme-immunoassay and column agglutination assays, which cover all immunoglobulin classes, demonstrated adequate sensitivity and negative predictive value; yet, both lacked specificity with respect to the platelet-activating antibodies. If all antibody positive patients were further classified by an IgG-specific anti-PF4/heparin enzyme-immuno assay, specificity for platelet-activating antibodies increased. Whereas IgG-specific optical density (OD) values below 1.0 were likely for non-platelet-activating anti-PF4/heparin antibodies, higher values were progressively predictive for pathogenic platelet activation. The probability of the development of clinical HIT also increased steeply. In conclusion, platelet-activating anti-PF4/heparin antibodies are relatively common (about 9%) in patients on MCS and are associated with significantly higher thrombotic event rates. Low IgG-specific OD values (< 1.0) in the enzyme-immunoassay indicate low likelihood for the presence of platelet-activating antibodies. These results justify further validation so that anticoagulation during MCS becomes safer and adequate.     

Fondaparinux for thromboembolic treatment and prophylaxis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

OBJECTIVE: To review literature evaluating the use of fondaparinux for thromboembolic treatment and prophylaxis in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search (1966-February 2006) was conducted using the search terms fondaparinux, heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, and thrombocytopenia to identify English-language articles. Additional sources were identified from bibliographies of select articles and the manufacturer. DATA SYNTHESIS: Fondaparinux, a pentasaccharide that selectively inhibits factor Xa, has been reported to have negligible or no cross-reactivity in vitro with HIT antibodies. Thromboembolic treatment and prophylaxis with fondaparinux in patients with HIT has been described. Three cases reported patients who were successfully treated for thromboembolic events with fondaparinux after developing HIT during therapy with unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). Another report showed positive outcomes using fondaparinux for prophylaxis in a patient who had previously developed HIT after receiving UFH. Moreover, 2 case series, one using fondaparinux for prophylaxis in patients with a previous diagnosis of HIT and the other using fondaparinux for treatment in patients who developed HIT while receiving UFH or LMWH, reported normal platelet counts during fondaparinux treatment. Finally, results of a retrospective review demonstrated that fondaparinux prevented thromboembolic events or recurrent thrombocytopenia in patients with a prior HIT diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Limited data support the use of fondaparinux for thromboembolic treatment or prophylaxis in patients with antibody assay-confirmed HIT who do not have a contraindication for fondaparinux use. Randomized controlled trials have not been published; therefore, questions remain regarding efficacy, safety, optimal doses, treatment duration, and incidence of thromboembolic events when fondaparinux is used in this setting. Prospective trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of fondaparinux in this patient population need to be conducted to answer these questions.     

Cutaneous dalteparin reactions associated with antibodies of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

OBJECTIVE: To report widespread cutaneous lesions due to low-molecular-weight heparin therapy associated with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), but without evidence of thrombocytopenia, and to review previously reported cases of skin reactions related to heparin therapy. CASE SUMMARY: A 59-year-old white man with a subtotally resected glioblastoma developed febrile neutropenia and pneumonia secondary to chemotherapy. The development of an upper extremity thrombosis, following insertion of a peripherally inserted central venous catheter, was treated with subcutaneous dalteparin. Cutaneous lesions developed distant from the site of injection. The diagnosis of HIT was confirmed despite stable platelet counts. Dalteparin therapy was discontinued immediately, and anticoagulation was maintained with warfarin. The skin lesions resolved without further complications. DISCUSSION: Numerous cases of heparin-induced cutaneous reactions have been reported. The majority of these describe a local reaction at the heparin injection site with or without associated thrombocytopenia. The case presented here is unique in that the observed skin reaction was distant to the injection site and occurred without thrombocytopenia, but with detectable heparin-dependent antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: Although a skin reaction is a rare complication of heparin therapy, it can be a clinical indicator of HIT despite normal platelet counts. Patients who develop skin lesions should have their heparin therapy discontinued and a diagnosis of HIT investigated.     

Prevalence of heparin-induced antibodies in patients with chronic renal failure undergoing hemodialysis

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) type II is a serious complication of heparin therapy. It presents initially as thrombocytopenia, and is associated with thrombosis in 20-50% of the cases. HIT is related to the presence of heparin-induced antibodies (HIA), which show specificity for the PF4-heparin (PF4-H) complex. The FcgammaRIIa receptor has been suggested to participate in the pathogenic mechanism of HIA. Since patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis (HD) are exposed repeatedly to heparin, we studied the prevalence of HIA and their eventual relationship with thrombocytopenia and/or thrombosis, and the possible participation of the FcgammaRIIa polymorphism. We studied 207 patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) undergoing HD. As a control we included 130 blood donors and 28 patients with CRF without HD. The HIA patients were studied with the use of a PF4-H ELISA. Additionally, in some positive cases for the previous test, a 14C- serotonin release assay (14C-SRA) was performed. The polymorphism FcgammaRIIa H/R131 was studied by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with allele-specific primers. Thirty-seven patients (17.9%) undergoing HD presented with HIA. The majority of these antibodies were IgG, IgM, and IgA. The HIA investigated presented specificity against the PF4-H complex, but not against PF4 alone (P<0.001). Twelve out of 22 (54.5%) PF4-H antibodies were positive when tested with the 14C-SRA. The distribution of the FcgammaRIIa polymorphism in patients and healthy controls was 42.6% and 41.6% for H/H131, 41% and 48.9% for the H/R131 isoform, and 16.4% and 9.5% for the R/R131 isoform, respectively. No statistically significant difference in the FcgammaRIIa isoform distribution was found. Twenty-nine out of 156 patients (18.5%) presented thrombocytopenia, and 21/207 (12.4%) had thrombosis of the native vein arterio-venous fistula (AVF). We did not find any statistically significant between HIA and thrombocytopenia or thrombosis. An important proportion of patients with CRF undergoing HD developed HIA, but these cases were not associated with thrombocytopenia or thrombosis of AVF. The frequency of the FcgammaRIIa polymorphism did not statistically differ between HIT type II and normal controls.     

Heparin-associated thrombocytopenia: observations on the mechanism of platelet aggregation

We investigated the mechanism of heparin-mediated platelet aggregation in 11 patients with heparin-associated thrombocytopenia. Severe thrombocytopenia (16,000 to 66,000 platelets/microliters) developed in each patient during heparin therapy, and platelet aggregation occurred in vitro when heparin was added to mixtures of patient plasma and normal platelet-rich plasma. In 10 patients, heparin-initiated platelet aggregation was inhibited by preincubation of mixtures of normal platelet-rich plasma and heparin-associated thrombocytopenia plasma with monoclonal antiglycoprotein Ib antibodies 6D1 or LJ-Ib1. Both antibodies are directed against the von Willebrand factor binding site on glycoprotein Ib and inhibit only ristocetin-induced platelet agglutination. Purified immunoglobulin G (IgG) from patients with heparin-associated thrombocytopenia also supported heparin-induced aggregation, but equivalent amounts of antigen-binding fragments [F(ab')2] did not. We also found that F(ab')2 of LJ-Lb1 did not inhibit heparin-induced platelet aggregation but retained inhibitory activity against ristocetin-induced platelet agglutination. The monoclonal antibody 3G6, directed against the alpha-chain of glycoprotein Ib but not inhibitory of ristocetin-induced platelet agglutination, had no effect on heparin-induced platelet aggregation. Antibodies to von Willebrand factor that inhibit ristocetin-induced platelet agglutination did not inhibit heparin-mediated platelet aggregation, but antibodies to glycoprotein IIb-IIIa blocked aggregation. These data suggest that platelet aggregation in heparin-associated thrombocytopenia may be initiated by an interaction between patient IgG, heparin, and the platelet surface. Platelet activation appears to be mediated by a platelet surface crystallizable fragment (Fc) receptor.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a general review.

Unfractionated heparin is widely used for numerous clinical situations. A well-known adverse effect of heparin exposure is thrombocytopenia. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is a clinicopathologic syndrome that can be associated with severe complications and significant mortality. The pathophysiology of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia includes an immune-mediated reaction to heparin that activates platelets and results in an acquired hypercoagulability. Diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia should incorporate clinical signs and symptoms and laboratory testing for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia antibodies. Therapy should include discontinuation of heparin, initiation of a direct thrombin inhibitor, and eventually therapy with warfarin (only after the platelet count is at least 100 x 10(9)/L).     

肝素诱导的血小板减少症的临床研究

目的 观察应用肝素治疗患者肝素诱导的血小板减少症(HIT)发病情况,探索血小板计数监测HIT的可行性及HIT抗体检测对HIT诊断的意义.方法 对在血管外科应用普通肝素(UFH)治疗的145例患者进行临床观察,于应用UFH治疗前及治疗后进行血小板计数、HIT抗体ELISA检测及肝素诱导的血小板聚集试验(HIPA)等实验室检测.结果 145例患者中血小板减少40例(27.6%),HIT抗体阳性59例(40.7%),HIPA阳性26例(17.9%),诊断HIT 24例(16.5%),其中发生HIT并血栓形成综合征(HITTS)5例(发病率3.4%,占HIT患者的20.8%).多数HIT患者(15例,62.5%)血小板减少与HIT抗体阳性、HIPA阳性同时发生.24例HIT患者的血小板计数均在停用UFH后3～6 d恢复到正常或达到用UFH前水平.结论 通过动态监测血小板计数、联合HIT抗体ELISA法检测及HIPA,可以早期诊断HIT,及时停用UFH,换用抗凝剂,HITTS的发生率有望进一步下降,减少致残、死亡的发生.

Abstract：

Objective To observe the incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in patients received unfractionated heparin ( UFH ) treatment, and explore the feasibility of monitoring HIT by platelet counts, as well as the significance of HIT-antibody test in HIT diagnosis. Methods 145 patients received UFH treatment in Vascular Surgery Department were studied. Before and after the UFH treatment,platelet counts, HIT-antibody ELISA test and heparin-induced platelet aggregation (HIPA) were tested.Results Among the 145 patients, thrombocytopenia occurred in 40 ( 27.6% ) cases, HIT-antibody ELISA test positive in 59(40.7% ) cases, HIPA test positive in 26( 17.9% ) cases. The HIT was diagnosed in 24 (16.5%) cases, and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (HITTS) occurred in 5( 3.4% in all cases, and 20.8% in HIT patients). In HIT patients, 15 patients (62.5%) were thrombocytopenia, HITantibody positive and HIPA test positive. Platelet counts in all of the 24 patients recovered to normal or level before UFH treatment in 3 -6 days after heparin withdrawal therapy. Conclusion HIT can be early diagnosed by monitoring platelet counts, HIT-antibody ELISA test and HIPA test. Withdrawal of heparin therapy in time and use of alternative anticoagulant, HITTS rate might be expected to decline further.     

Assays for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Tests for the presence of heparin-dependent antibodies (heparin-Ig) have evolved in parallel with improved understanding of the pathophysiology of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). The first group of tests relied upon platelet aggregation or activation. Among tests in this group, the serotonin release assay has been reported to demonstrate the best performance characteristics. However, this test has not been widely adopted outside a few specialized laboratories owing to its complexity and need for radioactive materials. As a result, the less sensitive and specific platelet aggregation test is more commonly used for the diagnosis of heparin-Ig. The literature suggests that test sensitivity can be improved by the use of the patient’s own platelets, platelets from selected donors known to be reactive in the assay, or washed platelets. Test specificity has been enhanced by the use of two point assays that include neutralization of the reaction by a high dose of heparin. A second group of assays have focused on detection of heparin-dependent binding of immunoglobulins to the platelet membrane. Most of these tests are hampered by the fact that platelets in patients with suspected HIT and in conditions that are in the differential diagnosis of HIT frequently express high levels of platelet-associated immunoglobulin. The most recent tests for heparin-Ig are based on the recognition that patient antibodies are directed against the heparin-PF4 complex. This has led to the development of the PF4/heparin EIA assay. Because whole platelets are not used in this assay, problems related to under-reactivity or nonspecific reactivity are avoided. In addition, the ability of the test to predict clinical complications may be improved because the test can distinguish IgM from IgG heparin-Ig. Currently the laboratory diagnosis of heparin-Ig remains inexact. The sensitivity and specificity of laboratory assays cannot be firmly established. Much like the diagnosis of the phospholipid syndrome — where use of both the cardiolipin EIA and the lupus anticoagulant test offer overlapping advantages — the combination of the heparin-PF4 EIA plus either a test of platelet activation or a heparin-dependent antibody binding assay may prove to be a more sensitive and specific approach to the diagnosis of heparin-Ig. Despite the progress that has been made in the area of laboratory diagnosis of heparin-Ig, further improvement is needed. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is not rare and may be associated with devastating morbidity as well as mortality. Low-molecular-weight heparins usually cross-react with heparin-Ig. Therapy with Org 10172 appears to be the most promising alternative for patients with HIT. Because the clinical diagnosis is uncertain in sick hospitalized patients, further improvements in laboratory assays for heparin-Ig allowing earlier and more accurate diagnosis of patients at risk for HIT will be welcome.     

An anesthesia provider's perspective of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a pathology manifested as clinically induced destruction of platelets. There are 2 forms of HIT, type I and type II; type II is the more serious. HIT type I is a transient, non-immune-mediated form manifesting with mild thrombocytopenia. Type II is a drug-induced, immune-mediated syndrome that may cause life- or limb-threatening thromboembolic events. Induction of general anesthesia for a person with HIT type II is no different from that for a person in the general population. Treatment modalities vary only if heparin will be used during the case. The initial indicator of HIT is decreased platelet count, with or without thrombosis. Clinical criteria and advanced serological testing are available for the definitive diagnosis of HIT. Clinical suspicion of HIT remains key to early cessation of heparin (all routes) and initiation of alternative treatments.     

Thrombin generation and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Summary.  Background : Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a severe complication of heparin therapy. IgG antibodies targeting the platelet factor 4-heparin complex activate platelets and generate microparticles with procoagulant activity. Objectives : To determine whether the thrombin generation assay is capable of detecting procoagulant activity induced by patient platelet-poor plasma (PPP) in donor platelet-rich plasma (PRP). Patients and methods : We explored two groups of patients; group 1 ( n  = 23): patients with a positive clinical and biological diagnosis of HIT; group 2 ( n  = 25): patients with a negative clinical and biological diagnosis of HIT. Mixtures of donor PRP and patient PPP (1:1) were incubated either with unfractionated heparin 0.2 U mL⁻¹ or with physiological saline. Thrombin generation was assessed by calibrated thrombinography. The effect of heparin on the mixtures was evaluated according to the ratio of the values with and without heparin (wH/woH) of the five thrombogram parameters. Results : With low heparin concentrations, plasma of group 1 activates donor platelets and generates procoagulant activity. A set of three ratios outside the cut-off values corresponds to the 'HIT thrombogram profile', characterized by a highly specific aspect of the thrombogram wH in relation to the thrombogram woH. None of the group 2 patients presented a HIT thrombogram profile. The results of thrombinography correlate well with the results of the platelet aggregation test. Conclusion : Our studies illustrate the central paradox of HIT, namely enhancement of thrombin generation in the presence of heparin. The HIT thrombogram profile as it is defined in this study can detect the procoagulant activity of HIT IgG antibodies.