The efficacy of anatomic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma within Milan criteria: A retrospective single-institution case-matched study

IntroductionStill now, the efficacy of anatomic resection (AR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is controversial. The aim of this study is to examine it in our cohort and detect an optimal indicator for AR.MethodsThe present study included 656 patients with primary HCC within Milan criteria who underwent hepatectomy from 2000 to 2019. Our cohort was divided into AR (n = 378) and non-anatomic resection (NAR) (n = 278) groups, and 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to minimize the effect of potential confounders. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and a preoperative indicator for AR were examined.Results210 patients from each group were well-matched, and preoperative confounding factors were balanced between the two groups. There was no significant difference in RFS and OS between the two groups before (RFS; HR = 0.89 P = 0.25, OS; HR = 1.08 P = 0.64) and after PSM (RFS; HR = 0.93 P = 0.60, OS; HR = 1.07 P = 0.75). Subgroup analysis showed that the survival improvement effect of AR was observed in cases with a fucosylated fraction of alfa-fetoprotein (AFP-L3) > 10% and poorly differentiation (P for interaction <0.05). Moreover, the logistic regression analysis showed that preoperative AFP-L3 > 10% was an independent predictor for poorly differentiation (OR = 2.58, P = 0.03).ConclusionThe efficacy of AR for patients with primary HCC within Milan criteria was not shown. But it was suggested that AFP-L3 > 10% might be a preoperative indicator of AR for HCC within Milan criteria.     

Transarterial chemoembolization <i>vs.</i> liver resection as initial treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma occurring exclusively in caudate lobe: A retrospective propensity matching analysis

Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the caudate lobe is technically challenging. This retrospective study was designed to evaluate the clinical outcome of both superselective transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and liver resection (LR) for HCC occurring exclusively in the caudate lobe. From January 2008 to September 2021, a total of 129 patients were diagnosed with HCC of the caudate lobe. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to analyze the potential clinical factors and established prognostic nomograms with interval validation. Of the total number of patients, 78 received TACE and 51 received LR. The overall survival (OS) rates (TACE vs. LR) at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years were 83.9% vs. 71.0%; 74.2% vs. 61.3%; 58.1% vs. 48.4%; 45.2% vs. 45.2%; and 32.3% vs. 25.0%, respectively. However, subgroup analysis revealed that TACE was superior to LR for treating patients with stage IIb Chinese liver cancer (CNLC-IIb) in the entire cohort (p = 0.002). Interestingly, no difference was found between TACE and LR in the treatment outcomes of CNLC-IIa HCC (p = 0.6). Based on Child-Pugh A and B calculations, TACE tended to lead to a better OS than LR (p = 0.081 and 0.16, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that Child-Pugh score, CNLC stage, ascites, alpha fetoprotein (AFP), tumor size, and anti-HCV are related to OS. Predictive nomograms for 1, 2, and 3 years were performed. Based on this study, TACE may provide a longer OS than liver resection for patients with CNLC-IIb HCC of the caudate lobe. Because this suggestion is limited by the study design and relatively small sample size, additional randomized controlled trials are needed.     

Impact of spontaneous rupture on the survival outcomes after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity matched analysis comparing ruptured versus non-ruptured tumors

IntroductionSpontaneous rupture of HCC (srHCC) is a life-threatening sequela of HCC characterized by a high mortality. Liver resection (LR) is the ideal therapeutic strategy as it not only arrests hemorrhage but also remove the offending tumour. We sought to determine the impact of spontaneous rupture on the survival outcomes of patients after LR by performing a propensity score matched (PSM) analysis comparing patients who underwent LR for srHCC versus non-ruptured (nrHCC).MethodsFrom 2000 to 2015, a total of 67 patients who underwent LR for srHCC which met the study criteria were included. 1:2 PSM was performed comparing 49 of 67 patients with srHCC with 98 nrHCC selected from a cohort of 724 patients who underwent LR during the study period.ResultsMedian survival following LR for srHCC was 21.9 months, while 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) was 43.1% and 19.4% respectively. After 1:2 PSM analysis, there was no significant difference between LR for srHCC (n = 49) versus nrHCC (n-98) in terms of OS [21.9 (interquartile range (IQR), 11.8–44.0 vs 27.4 (IQR, 6.9–57.8) months, HR 1.02, CI 0.63–1.66, p = 0.94], DFS [11.8 (IQR, 5.6–25.6) vs 13.77 (IQR,4.5–34.9) HR 0.74, CI 0.54–1.02, p = 0.06] and length of stay [8 (IQR, 7–11) vs 7 (IQR, 6–10) HR 0.93, CI 0.0.68–1.29), p = 0.68].ConclusionLR for clinically stable patients with srHCC provides survival and recurrence outcomes that are comparable to patients with nrHCC.     

Comparison of anatomic and non-anatomic resections for very early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: The importance of surgical resection margin width in non-anatomic resection

BackgroundThe superiority of anatomic resection (AR) over non-anatomic resection (NAR) for very early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has remained a topic of debate. Thus, this study aimed to compare the prognosis after AR and NAR for single HCC less than 2 cm in diameter.MethodsConsecutive patients with single HCC of diameter less than 2 cm who underwent curative hepatectomy between 1997 and 2017 were included in this retrospective study.ResultsIn total, 159 patients were included in this study. Of these, 52 patients underwent AR (AR group) and 107 patients underwent NAR (NAR group). No significant differences were noted in recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) between the AR and NAR groups (P = 0.236 and P = 0.363, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that low preoperative platelet count and presence of satellite nodules were independent prognostic factors of RFS and OS. Wide surgical resection margin did not affect RFS (P = 0.692) in the AR group; however, in the NAR group, RFS was found to be higher with surgical resection margin widths ≥1 cm than with surgical resection margin widths <1 cm (P = 0.038).ConclusionsPrognosis was comparable between the NAR and AR groups for very early-stage HCC with well-preserved liver function. For better oncologic outcomes, surgeons should endeavor in keeping the surgical resection margin widths during NAR ≥1 cm.     

Association of primary tumor location with long-term oncological prognosis following hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma:A multicenter propensity score matching analysis

PurposeThere is a striking laterality in the site of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with a strong predominance for the right side; however, the impact of primary tumor location on long-term prognosis after hepatectomy of HCC remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effect of primary tumor location on long-term oncological prognosis after hepatectomy for HCC.Patients and methodsData of consecutive patients undergoing curative hepatectomy for HCC between 2008 and 2017 were analyzed. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of left-sided HCC (LS group) and right-sided HCC (RS group) were compared by using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. COX regression analysis was performed to assess the adjusted effect of tumor location on long-term oncological prognosis.ResultsOf the 2799 included patients, 707 (25.3%) and 2092 (74.7%) were in the LS and RS groups, respectively. Using PSM analysis, 650 matched pairs of patients were created. In the PSM cohort, median OS (66.0 vs. 72.0 months, P = 0.001) and RFS (28.0 vs. 51.0 months, P < 0.001) were worse among patients in the LS group compared to individuals in the RS group. After further adjustment for other confounders using multivariable COX regression analyses, HCC located on the left side remained independently associated with worse OS and RFS.ConclusionTumors located on the left side are associated with poorer OS and RFS after hepatectomy for HCC. Careful surgical options selection and frequent follow-up to improve long-term survival may be justified for HCC patients with left-sided primary tumors.     

Long-term surgical outcomes of Non alcoholic fatty liver disease associated hepatocellular carcinoma

BackgroundThe global burden of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and NAFLD-associated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is steadily rising. We pursued to investigate the results after liver resection for NAFLD-HCC versus hepatitis B virus (HBV)-HCC exploiting Kaplan Meier method, log-rank test and uni/multivariate analysis with the logistic regression models”.MethodsPatients who underwent liver resection for HCC between January 2004 and December 2018 were included. The outcomes of NAFLD-associated HCC were analyzed.ResultsThe prevalence of NAFLD-associated HCC was 8.4%. A significant number of NAFLD patients had no cirrhosis (21 patients; 38.8%). Although NAFLD patients had a significantly better 5-year survival (P = 0.033), NAFLD was not significantly associated with overall survival in multivariate analysis (P = 0.287). However, survival after 5 years declined in NAFLD patients and was similar to HBV. NAFLD was protective against systemic recurrence compared with HBV (P = 0.018), and this was confirmed in multivariate analysis (P = 0.044). Five-year systemic recurrence (P = 0.044) was significantly lower in NAFLD patients and decreased with time from surgery. Multivariate analysis revealed that anatomical liver resection was independently associated with decreased recurrence in NAFLD patients (HR = 0.337; P = 0.033).ConclusionOverall survival is similar between NAFLD-associated HCC and HBV-associated HCC. Despite there being no significant difference between liver function tests, type of surgery performed, liver cirrhosis, size of tumor, number of tumors, pathological factors like satellite nodules and Edmonson Steiner staging, NAFLD-associated HCC shows lower systemic recurrence compared to HBV-associated HCC.     

Liver resection is justified for multinodular hepatocellular carcinoma in selected patients with cirrhosis: A multicenter analysis of 1,066 patients

BackgroundThe role of liver resection for multinodular (≥3 nodules) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear, especially among patients with severe underlying liver disease. We sought to evaluate surgical outcomes among patients with cirrhosis and multinodular HCC undergoing liver resection.MethodsUsing a multicenter database, outcomes among cirrhotic patients who underwent curative-intent resection of HCC were examined stratified according to the presence or absence of multinodular disease. Perioperative mortality and morbidity, as well as overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared between the two groups.ResultsAmong 1066 cirrhotic patients, 906 (85.0%) had single- or double-nodular HCC (the non-multinodular group), while 160 (15.0%) had multinodular HCC (the multinodular group). There were no differences in postoperative 30-day mortality and morbidity among non-multinodular versus multinodular patients (1.8% vs. 1.9%, P = 0.923, and 36.0% vs. 39.4%, P = 0.411, respectively). In contrast, 5-year OS and RFS of multinodular patients were worse compared with non-multinodular patients (34.6% vs. 58.2%, and 24.7% vs. 44.5%, both P < 0.001). On multivariable analyses, tumor numbers ≥5, total tumor diameter ≥8 cm and microvascular invasion were independent risk factors for decreased OS and RFS after resection of multinodular HCC in cirrhotic patients.ConclusionsLiver resection can be safely performed for multinodular HCC in the setting of cirrhosis with an overall 5-year survival of 34.6%. Tumor number ≥5, total tumor diameter ≥8 cm and microvascular invasion were independently associated with decreased OS and RFS after resection in cirrhotic patients with multinodular HCC.     

Real-world role of performance status in surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter study

BackgroundThe Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) categorizes a patient with performance status (PS)-1 as advanced stage of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and surgical resection is not recommended. In real-world clinical practice, PS-1 is often not a contraindication to surgery for HCC. The aim of current study was to define the impact of PS on the surgical outcomes of patients undergoing liver resection for HCC.Methods1,531 consecutive patients who underwent a curative-intent resection of HCC between 2005 and 2015 were identified using a multi-institutional database. After categorizing patients into PS-0 (n = 836) versus PS-1 (n = 695), perioperative mortality and morbidity, overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared.ResultsOverall perioperative mortality and major morbidity among patients with PS-0 (n = 836) and PS-1 (n = 695) were similar (1.4% vs. 1.6%, P = 0.525 and 9.7% vs. 10.2%, P = 0.732, respectively). In contrast, median OS and RFS was worse among patients who had PS-1 versus PS-0 (34.0 vs. 107.6 months, and 20.5 vs. 60.6 months, both P < 0.001, respectively). On multivariable Cox-regression analyses, PS-1 was independently associated with worse OS (HR: 1.301, 95% CI: 1.111–1.523, P < 0.001) and RFS (HR: 1.184, 95% CI: 1.034–1.358, P = 0.007).ConclusionsPatients with PS-1 versus PS-0 had comparable perioperative outcomes. However, patients with PS-1 had worse long-term outcomes as PS-1 was independently associated with worse OS and RFS. Routine exclusion of HCC patients with PS-1 from surgical resection as recommended by the BCLC guidelines is not warranted.     

Partial hepatectomy vs. transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for multiple hepatocellular carcinomas of BCLC-B stage: A meta-analysis of high-quality studies

Background/aimThe Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) recommends that transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) are indicated in patients with multiple hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) of BCLC-B stage. However, partial hepatectomy (PH) has increasely performed in these patients. The purpose of this meta-analyses is to illustrate the comparative survival benefits of PH and TACE for patients with multiple HCCs of BCLC-B stage.MethodElectronic databases were systematically searched for eligible studies that compared PH and TACE performed in patients with multiple HCCs of BCLC-B stage. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were reviewed systematically. The reported data were aggregated statistically using the RevMan5.3 software. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoint were the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates, postoperative 30-day mortality and postoperative complications.ResultsA total of seven high-quality studies (one randomized controlled trial [RCT], six propensity-score matching (PSM) nonrandomized comparative trials [non-RCTs] that met the inclusion criteria, which comprised of 2487 patients (1245 PH and 1242 TACE) in the meta-analysis. When compared with the TACE group, the PH group had a significantly higher OS (HR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.48–1.84; P = 0.26; I² = 22%) and 1-, 3-, 5-year survival rates (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.59–2.41; P = 0.0005; I² = 75%; P < 0.00001; OR, 2.92; 95% CI, 1.94–4.42; P = 0.0001; I² = 78%; P < 0.00001; OR, 2.60; 95% CI, 2.17–3.11; P = 0.13; I² = 44%; P < 0.00001; respectively). Survival benefits persisted across sensitivity and subgroup analyses; High heterogeneity remained after sensitivity and subgroup analyses for 3-year survival rates.ConclusionPH can provide more survival benefit for patients with multiple HCCs of BCLC-B stage compared with TACE.     

Long-term outcomes of deceased donor liver transplantation in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with portal vein tumor thrombus: A multicenter study

BackgroundThe incidence of portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) has been reported to be as high as approximately 10%–40% in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The long-term prognosis of deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) in HCC patients with PVTT remains unknown.MethodsData of 961 HCC patients who underwent DDLT between 2015 and 2018 in six centers were analyzed. Based on the Milan criteria (MC) and Cheng's classification of PVTT, the patients were divided into 4 groups: within MC, beyond MC without PVTT, type 1 PVTT, and type 2 PVTT groups.Results489 (50.9%) were within the MC, 296 (30.8%) beyond the MC but without PVTT, 83 (8.6%) type 1 PVTT, and 93 (9.7%) type 2 PVTT. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that type 1 or 2 PVTT patients with alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) ≤ 100 ng/mL had overall survival (OS) similar to that of patients within the MC (P = 0.957), and superior OS (P = 0.003 and 0.009) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (P = 0.038 and <0.001) than those of patients beyond the MC and PVTT patients with AFP > 100 ng/mL. Multivariable Cox-regression analysis identified type 1 and 2 PVTT to be independent risk factor for RFS [hazard ratio (HR) 1.523 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.162–1.997, P = 0.002], but not for OS (HR 1.283, 95%CI 0.922–1.786, P = 0.139).ConclusionHCC patients with type 1 or 2 PVTT may be acceptable candidates for DDLT. To achieve better outcomes, preoperative AFP levels should be seriously considered when selecting patients with PVTT for DDLT.