Antihypertensive drugs and the kidney

In the United States, 50 million Americans are estimated to have hypertension. Over the past several decades, it has become clear that hypertension is both a cause and a consequence of kidney disease. In contrast to the striking decline in mortality rates from both stroke and coronary heart disease, the prevalence of hypertension as a cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has increased such that it is now the second most common cause of ESRD in the United States. Hypertension and proteinuria occur in most patients with chronic kidney disease and are risk factors for faster progression of kidney disease. Antihypertensive agents reduce blood pressure and urine protein excretion and slow the progression of kidney disease. The level of blood pressure achieved and use of renin-angiotensinaldosterone system-blocking agents is critical for delaying progression of renal disease in all ethnic groups.     

Antihypertensive drugs and malignant neoplasia

Analysis of epidemiological, cohort and randomized studies of antihypertensive drugs containing reports of development of malignant neoplasms shows that long term use of some antihypertensive drugs while preventing cardiovascular complications has been associated with increased risk of malignancies. Most convincing evidence exists for association between the use of diuretics and renal cancer. Association between the use of reserpine and breast cancer in women, between atenolol and some types of cancer in elderly men also can not be ruled out. There is no proof of existence of either negative or positive correlation between malignant neoplasia and long-term use of calcium antagonists, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers.     

Antihypertensive drugs and fibrinolytic function

Impaired fibrinolytic function, characterized by increased plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) levels and decreased tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) activity, has been found in patients with hypertension and may account in part for the increased risk of atherosclerosis and its clinical complications in these patients. Failure to correct this prothrombotic state may be one of the possible reasons for the disappointing effect of antihypertensive treatment on the incidence of coronary events. In this regard, data from the literature indicate that different antihypertensive drugs may vary in their influence on fibrinolysis. Scarce and conflicting data exist regarding the effects of diuretics and beta-blockers on the fibrinolytic system. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (ACE-I) have generally been shown to improve the fibrinolytic balance by reducing plasma PAI-1 levels, calcium channel blockers (CCB) have been reported to increase t-PA activity, and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) seem to be neutral in their effect. Interesting data have been reported about the positive impact on fibrinolysis of combining an ACE-I with a CCB, which resulted in a decrease of PAI-1 caused by ACE inhibition, and an increase in t-PA resulting from calcium channel blockade. The positive effect of ACE-I on the fibrinolytic system has been related to: 1) inhibition of angiotensin II, which stimulates PAI-1 expression; 2) inhibition of degradation of bradykinin, a potent stimulus for tPA production; and 3) improvement of insulin sensitivity. The mechanisms underlying the CCB effect on t-PA are less clear, but a direct action of CCB on vascular endothelium has been reported to play a major role. The greater improvement in the fibrinolytic balance because of the combined action of ACE inhibition and Ca antagonism represents a further indication to the use of combinations of ACE-I and CCB in the treatment of hypertension.     

Antihypertensive drugs and diabetic nephropathy

Diabetic nephropathy is the most common cause of endstage renal disease in the United States. Hypertension is a major risk factor that predisposes individuals with diabetes to the development of renal disease and is very common in patients with diabetes. The benefit of blood pressure control on the rate of progression of diabetic nephropathy is being increasingly demonstrated in both type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors have proven renoprotective benefits in human studies, but the results of studies with calcium channel blockers are somewhat inconclusive. The other classes of antihypertensives also may have certain indications in the population of patients with diabetic nephropathy. In this paper we will critically review current strategies for the treatment of hypertension in patients with established diabetic nephropathy.     

Antihypertensive drugs and glucose metabolism

Hypertension plays a major role in the development and progression of micro-and macrovascular disease.Moreover,increased blood pressure often coexists with additional cardiovascular risk factors such as insulin resistance.As a result the need for a comprehensive management of hypertensive patients is critical.However,the various antihypertensive drug categories have different effects on glucose metabolism.Indeed,angiotensin receptor blockers as well as angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors have been associated with beneficial effects on glucose homeostasis.Calcium channel blockers(CCBs)have an overall neutral effect on glucose metabolism.However,some members of the CCBs class such as azelnidipine and manidipine have been shown to have advantageous effects on glucose homeostasis.On the other hand,diuretics andβ-blockers have an overall disadvantageous effect on glucose metabolism.Of note,carvedilol as well as nebivolol seem to differentiate themselves from the rest of theβ-blockers class,being more attractive options regarding their effect on glucose homeostasis.The adverse effects of some blood pressure lowering drugs on glucose metabolism may,to an extent,compromise their cardiovascular protective role.As a result the effects on glucose homeostasis of the various blood pressure lowering drugs should be taken into account when selecting an antihypertensive treatment,especially in patients which are at high risk for developing diabetes.     

Antihypertensive drugs and cognitive function

The increase in life expectancy is associated with a sharp rise in cognitive disorders, particularly after the age of 80 years. The identification and management of risk factors for these invalidating and distressing conditions must be considered a priority. Hypertension has been shown to carry an increased risk not only for cerebrovascular morbidity and mortality, but also for cognitive impairment and dementia. The fact that antihypertensive treatment has been demonstrated to decrease those risks offers a new opportunity to reduce the prevalence of such related disorders and to promote healthy aging.     

Antihypertensive drugs and central blood pressure

Recent evidence suggests that central blood pressure is a more important determinant of cardiovascular risk than brachial pressure. Interestingly, antihypertensive drugs exert different effects on brachial and central pressure. Traditional β-blockers, such as atenolol, appear to have an adverse impact on central pressure, despite lowering brachial pressure. This may help to explain the results of recent large outcome studies using atenolol. Further research is required to clarify whether other antihypertensive agents lower central pressure beyond the effects observed on brachial pressure.     

Antihypertensive drugs and sympathetic nervous system

Several studies have demonstrated that essential hypertension is accompanied by sympathetic activation, which contributes to blood pressure elevation. Sympathetic activation also has adverse consequences in hypertensive patients beyond initiating blood pressure elevation. There is evidence that neural vasoconstriction has metabolic effects in skeletal muscle, impairing glucose delivery to muscles. In the liver, retarding of post prandial clearance of lipids contributes to hyperlipidemia. Cardiac sympathetic activation is a probable cause of sudden death in hearth failure. A trophic effect of sympathetic activation on cardiovascular growth is also likely, contributing to the development of left ventricular hypertrophy. Consequently, one of the major aims of antihypertensive therapy should be to attenuate sympathetic tone. It is possible that, among the antihypertensive drugs available, those inhibiting the sympathetic nervous system might best reduce cardiovascular risk.     

Antihypertensive drugs and reversing of endothelial dysfunction in hypertension

Essential hypertension is associated with impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation and is caused mainly by production of oxygen free radicals that can destroy nitric oxide (NO), impairing its beneficial and protective effects on the vessel wall. Antihypertensive drugs can improve or restore endothelium-dependent vasodilation depending on their ability to counteract the mechanisms that impair endothelial function. Although treatment with atenolol gives negative results in peripheral subcutaneous and muscle microcirculation, acute nebivolol exerts a modest vasodilating effect in the forearm circulation. Whether this compound can activate NO production in essential hypertensive patients is controversial. Calcium entry blockers, particularly the dihydropyridine-like drugs, can reverse impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation in different vascular districts, including the subcutaneous, epicardial, and peripheral arteries and forearm circulation. In the forearm circulation, nifedipine and lacidipine can improve endothelial dysfunction by restoring NO availability. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, however, seem to improve endothelial function in subcutaneous, epicardial, and renal circulation, but are ineffective in potentiating the blunted response to acetylcholine in the forearm of patients with essential hypertension. Finally, recent evidence suggests angiotensin II receptor antagonists can restore endothelium-dependent vasodilation t acetylcholine in subcutaneous, but not in the forearm muscle, microcirculation. However, treatment with an angiotensin II receptor antagonist can improve basal NO release and decrease the vasoconstrictor effect of endogenous endothelin-1.     

Antihypertensive drugs inhibit hypertension-associated aortic DNA synthesis in the rat

The effect of antihypertensive drug treatment on aortic DNA synthesis was examined in rats with two-kidney, one clip renal hypertension and in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). In two-kidney, one clip hypertensive rats, hypertension developed over a 2-week period. Four days after clipping the renal artery, during the onset of hypertension, there was an increase in aortic DNA synthesis. Aortic DNA synthesis was also increased 3 weeks later, when hypertension had been established. Captopril, hydralazine, and verapamil were each able to prevent the increase in aortic DNA synthesis and the rise in blood pressure when given throughout the first 5 days of the developing phase of hypertension, or when given to rats with established hypertension. Drug treatment of sham-operated rats had no significant effect on DNA synthesis, although blood pressure was decreased. There were no differences in blood pressure or aortic DNA synthesis in 4-week-old SHR, as compared with age-matched Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) controls or normal Wistar rats. At 17 weeks of age, when hypertension was established, aortic DNA synthesis was significantly enhanced in the SHR. Captopril or hydralazine treatment was able to reduce blood pressure and DNA synthesis to levels seen in the WKY. At 21 weeks of age, DNA synthesis in the SHR had declined to the same levels as in the WKY. Captopril, hydralazine, and verapamil may have a common ability to reduce intracellular calcium and therefore inhibit DNA synthesis. In support of this, ouabain treatment, which increases intracellular calcium by inhibiting the Na+-K+ pump, produced a significant increase in the rate of DNA synthesis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Obesity drugs and the heart

Appetite suppressant-related pulmonary hypertension and valvular heart disease are established disorders. Currently, the mechanism of these disorders is not certain. An estimated 6 million Americans and 70 million persons worldwide have been exposed to fenfluramine and dexfenfluramine. The clinical significance and long-term prognosis of cardiovascular effects and, thus, the potential public health effect of these disorders are not known. Longitudinal studies are required to further evaluate these disease processes. In addition, although isolated cases of regression of pulmonary hypertension and valve disease have been reported after the cessation of appetite suppressant therapy, the natural history remains uncertain.