Response to antiplatelet therapy is independent of endogenous thrombin generation potential

Background

Thrombin is the most potent platelet activator, and achieves rapid platelet activation even in the presence of antiplatelet therapy. Since activated platelets respond stronger to additional stimuli, the extent of endogenous thrombin generation may in part be responsible for the reported response variability to aspirin and clopidogrel therapy.

Patients and methods

Thrombin generation potential was measured with a commercially available assay, and platelet reactivity was assessed with the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation assay, light transmission aggregometry (LTA), the VerifyNow aspirin and P2Y12 assays, and multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) in 316 patients on dual antiplatelet therapy undergoing angioplasty and stenting.

Results

Peak thrombin, the lag phase and the area under the curve of thrombin generation correlated poorly with on-treatment platelet reactivity by all test systems. High on-treatment residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) in response to arachidonic acid was seen in 33 (10.5%), 41 (13%), and 79 (25.7%) patients by LTA, the VerifyNow aspirin assay, and MEA, respectively. HRPR in response to adenosine diphosphate was seen in 150 (48.1%), 48 (15.3%), 106 (33.7%), and 118 (38.3%) patients by the VASP assay, LTA, the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay, and MEA, respectively. Peak thrombin generation did not differ between patients without and with HRPR by the VASP assay, LTA, the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay and MEA. In the VerifyNow aspirin assay, patients without HRPR had higher peak thrombin generation than patients with HRPR (p = 0.01). Finally, patients without and with high peak thrombin generation exhibited similar on-treatment platelet reactivity by all test systems, and high peak thrombin generation occurred to a similar extent in patients without and with HRPR.

Conclusion

Response to antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel is not associated with thrombin generation potential.     

The influencing factors for clopidogrel-mediated platelet inhibition are assay-dependent

Background

Influencing factors for clopidogrel-mediated platelet inhibition have only been evaluated by one or two different test systems in the same population so far. Since previous studies revealed poor correlations between the various platelet function tests, the identification of influencing variables for clopidogrel response may vary from one test system to the next. We therefore investigated whether the influencing factors for clopidogrel-mediated platelet inhibition depend on the used assay.

Patients and methods

Adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-inducible platelet reactivity was assessed by light transmission aggregometry (LTA), the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay, the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation assay, multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA), and the Impact-R in 288 patients after angioplasty and stenting for cardiovascular disease. By univariate and multivariate regression analyses, we evaluated the impact of age ≥ 75, gender, body mass index (BMI), diabetes, active smoking, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, C-reactive protein, platelet count, creatinine, use of calcium-channel blockers (CCBs), statins, proton pump inhibitors, beta blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor blockers on clopidogrel-mediated platelet inhibition in each test system.

Results

None of the independent influencing variables was consistent through all test systems. Only by LTA and the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay, age ≥ 75 and the use of CCBs were independently associated with higher on-treatment platelet reactivity. Only by the VASP assay and MEA, on-treatment platelet reactivity increased linearly with BMI. Further, only by MEA, residual ADP-inducible platelet reactivity increased linearly with platelet count, whereas an increase in platelet count was independently associated with a decrease in ADP-inducible platelet activation by the Impact-R.

Conclusion

The influencing factors for platelet reactivity during clopidogrel therapy are assay-dependent.     

Impact of the proton pump inhibitors and CYP2C19*2 polymorphism on platelet response to clopidogrel as assessed by four platelet function assays

Background

Previous studies suggested a possible negative interference of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) on clopidogrel’s antiplatelet effect because of the competitive inhibition of the CYP 2C19 isoenzyme. Moreover, carriers of the loss-of-function allele of CYP2C19 polymorphism (CYP2C19*2) display significantly lower responses to clopidogrel. In this study, we investigated the association between CYP2C19*2 genotype, PPI intake and clopidogrel resistance in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and their effect on clinical outcome.

Methods

We recruited 95 patients with CAD receiving chronic clopidogrel therapy in combination with aspirin. Platelet reactivity was simultaneously assessed by INNOVANCE PFA-100 P2Y, ADP-induced light transmission aggregometry (LTA), flow-cytometric vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP)-phosphorylation assay and multiple electrode aggregometry (Multiplate). Cardiovascular outcomes were recorded during 1-year follow-up period.

Results

Only platelet reactivity assessed by measuring platelet phosphorylated-VASP demonstrated a significant higher platelet reactivity in carriers of CYP2C19*2 (p = 0.023). The other methods displayed higher - but not statistically significant - platelet reactivity in patients carrying the CYP2C19*2 variant as compared with non-carriers. Patients on PPIs demonstrated almost similar suppression of platelet reactivity in comparison with those not treated with PPIs by all platelet function assays. In logistic regression analysis none of the platelet function assays measurements were related with clinical outcomes. Similarly neither CYP2C19*2 genetic variant nor PPI treatment were associated with adverse clinical events.

Conclusions

PPI co-administration did not influence clopidogrel’s antiplatelet effect on laboratory testing by all platelet function assays used. On the contrary, patients carrying CYP2C19*2 genotype had significantly higher residual platelet reactivity as estimated by VASP-phosphorylation assay.     

CYP2C19*2 and other genetic variants affecting platelet response to clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Introduction

Information regarding any possible additional effect of genetic variants other than CYP2C19*2 on platelet reactivity in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), while on dual antiplatelet therapy, is sparse.

Materials and Methods

Genotyping for CYP2C19*2, CYP2C19*17, CYP2C9*3, CYP2B6*5, ABCB1 and P2RY12 (c.-217 + 2739 T > C) variants was performed in 146 consecutive PCI patients receiving clopidogrel. Platelet reactivity was assessed by the Verify Now P2Y12 point-of-care assay and high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) was defined as a Platelet Reactivity Unit (PRU) ≥ 235.

Results

We identified 65(44.5%) patients with HTPR and 38(26%) carriers of at least one CYP2C19*2 allele, which had higher platelet reactivity compared to non-carriers [least square (LS) mean difference 44.5, 95%CI 15.8-77.3, p = 0.003]. In the entire study population, the presence of at least one CYP2C19*2 or P2RY12 allelic variant was independently associated with HTPR (OR = 3.02, 95%CI 1.16-7.86, p = 0.023 and OR = 3.11, 95%CI 1.03-9.39, p = 0.05 respectively). In CYP2C19*2 non-carriers, carriers of at least one CYP2B6*5 allelic variant had higher platelet reactivity compared to the remainders (LS mean difference 35.6, 95%CI 3.7-67.6, p = 0.03) and the presence of at least one CYP2B6*5 or P2RY12 allelic variant was independently associated with HTPR (OR = 3.26, 95%CI 1.08-9.86, p = 0.04 and OR = 4.27, 95%CI 1.11-16.4, p = 0.04 respectively).

Conclusions

Apart from the CYP2C19*2, other genetic variants involved in clopidogrel metabolism and action like CYP2B6*5 and P2RY12 seem to have an important association with HTPR.     

Factors associated with the failure of clopidogrel dose-adjustment according to platelet reactivity monitoring to optimize P2Y12-ADP receptor blockade

Introduction

Inter-individual variability in clopidogrel responsiveness is dependent on genetic polymorphisms. We aimed to investigate the impact of 3 genetic polymorphisms involved in clopidogrel metabolism on a strategy of dose-adjustment according to platelet reactivity (PR) monitoring.

Materiel and methods

This prospective multicenter study enrolled 498 ACS patients undergoing PCI. PR was measured using the Vasodilator-Stimulated Phosphoprotein index (VASP) and a cut-off value of ≥ 50% defined high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR). Genetic polymorphisms of cytochrome (CYP) 2C19, Paraxonase-1 (PON1) and ABCB1 were determined by allele specific PCR. Dose-adjustment was performed using up-to 3 additional loading doses (LD) of 600 mg clopidogrel in order to obtain a VASP < 50% in patients with HTPR following the first LD.

Results

CYP 2C19 2*polymorphism (p = 0.02), but neither PON1 (p = 0.8) nor ABCB1 genotype (p = 0.9), was significantly associated with HTPR. The dose-adjustment strategy failed in 11% of patients. ABCB1 polymorphism was significantly associated with a failed dose-adjustment (FDA) (p = 0.04). No relation was found between the other genotypes and the efficacy of LD adjustment. In multivariate analysis, BMI and ABCB1 polymorphism were the only factors significantly associated with FDA (p = 0.005 and p = 0.04 respectively).

Conclusion

While CYP 2C19 2* is associated with HTPR after 600 mg of clopidogrel, ABCB1 is responsible for the failure of a strategy of loading dose-adjustment according to PR monitoring. These findings may help to define a therapeutic strategy to optimize anti-platelet therapy in ACS patients undergoing PCI.     

The cytochrome 2C19*2 and *3 alleles attenuate response to clopidogrel similarly in East Asian patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention

Introduction

Carriage of CYP2C19*2 allele is associated with diminished platelet response to clopidogrel. However, the loss-of-function impact of CYP2C19*3 allele on antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel has not been definitely verified. We conducted this study to compare decreased response to clopidogrel according to carriage of CYP2C19*2 vs. *3 allele.

Materials and methods

The study included 190 consecutive Korean patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention. Light transmittance aggregometry and the VerifyNow P2Y₁₂ assay were used to assess platelet reactivity (PR) at least 12 hours after 300-mg loading of clopidogrel. The cutoff of high on-treatment PR (HPR) was defined as 5 μmol/L ADP-induced PR > 50%. CYP2C19 genotype was analyzed by the SNaPshot method.

Results

Carriers of at least one CYP2C19 variant allele were 115 patients (60.5%), and allelic frequency of CYP2C19*2 and *3 was 30.3% and 6.8%, respectively. PR and the rate of HPR increased proportionally according to the number of CYP2C19 variant allele. Carriage of CYP2C19 variant allele was an only independent predictor of HPR in multivariate analysis. When we compare the effect of allelic carriage, there were no significant differences in platelet measures and the rate of HPR between carriers of CYP2C19*2 and/or *3 allele(s) whether they were intermediate or poor metabolizers.

Conclusion

Carriage of CYP2C19*3 allele is associated with diminished antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel, which may be as potent as the loss-of-function effect of CYP2C19*2 allele.     

Determination of cut-off levels for on-clopidogrel platelet aggregation based on functional CYP2C19 gene variants in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention

Introduction

Carriers of reduced-function CYP2C19 allele on antiplatelet therapy show diminished platelet inhibition and higher rate of clinical risk. The purpose of this study was to determine cut-off levels of VerifyNow P2Y12 system associated with effective inhibition of on-clopidogrel platelet aggregation to predict carriers of CYP2C19 reduced-function allele among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Materials and Methods

We enrolled 202 consecutive patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing PCI and treated with clopidogrel. All patients underwent CYP2C19 genotyping and measurement of residual platelet aggregation by VerifyNow system.

Results

Carriers of CYP2C19 reduced-function allele constituted 131 (65%) of 202 CAD patients. Platelet inhibition measured by P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) and %inhibition was diminished in carriers compared with noncarriers (PRU: 290.0 ± 81.2 vs 217.6 ± 82.4, p < 0.001, %inhibition: 17.9 ± 17.8 vs 35.5 ± 22.8, p < 0.001, respectively). Multiple logistic regression analysis identified PRU and %inhibition as significant predictors of carrier state [odds ratio (OR) 4.95; 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 2.49 to 9.85; p < 0.001, OR 5.55; 95%CI: 2.80 to 10.99; p < 0.001, respectively]. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis showed that PRU and %inhibition were significant predictors of carrier state [area under the curve (AUC) 0.736 (95%CI: 0.664 to 0.808; p < 0.001), AUC 0.727 (95%CI: 0.651 to 0.803; p < 0.001), respectively]. The cut-off levels of PRU and %inhibition were 256 and 26.5% for the identification of carriers.

Conclusions

Our results suggested that the cut-off levels of PRU and %inhibition to discriminate carriers of CYP2C19 reduced-function allele from noncarriers are potentially useful clinically to provide optimal clopidogrel therapy in patients with stable CAD undergoing PCI.     

Genetic and non-genetic factors responsible for antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel in Japanese patients undergoing coronary stent implantation: An algorithm to predict on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity

Introduction

Antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel appear to be affected by various factors including genetic polymorphism. So far, there has been little information about the response of clopidogrel in Asians, whose prevalence of a CYP2C19 loss-of-function (LOF) allele is high.

Methods and Results

We investigated background and clinical factors affecting on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity in Japanese patients undergoing coronary stent implantation (n = 114). In univariate analysis, antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel in a steady state were associated with not only CYP2C19 genotypes but also several factors including dyslipidemia. In addition, we developed an algorithm that can estimate P2Y12 Reaction Units (PRU) in a steady state by multiple regression analysis and evaluated the adequacy of the algorithm by the Akaike Information Criterion.

Conclusions

We revealed several factors influencing on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity in Japanese patients. We also succeeded in developing an algorithm that estimates PRU in a steady state, although it is uncertain whether the algorithm can be applied to other populations.     

Impact of P2Y12-ADP receptor polymorphism on the efficacy of clopidogrel dose-adjustment according to platelet reactivity monitoring in coronary artery disease patients

Introduction

High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) after clopidogrel loading dose (LD) is associated with a high risk of thrombotic events after percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI). We have demonstrated that HTPR could be overcome in the majority of cases using LD adjustment resulting in an improved clinical outcome. However this strategy failed in nearly 10% of patients with HTPR. We aimed to determine if P2Y12-ADP receptor polymorphisms were associated with failed dose adjustment.

Materiel and method

Forty-three patients undergoing PCI were included in this prospective study. A VASP index ≥ 50% after a 600 mg LD of clopidogrel defined HTPR. Dose adjustment was performed according to PR monitoring to reach a VASP index < 50%. Genetic polymorphism of the P2Y12-ADP receptor was determined by direct sequencing.

Results

Patients with successful dose-adjustment (SDA) (n = 33) and failed (FDA) (n = 10) dose-adjustment groups were compared. The 2 groups were similar in terms of cardiovascular risk factors including diabetes mellitus (SDA vs FDA: 42 vs 20%; p = 0.3). The prevalence of the H2 allele of the P2Y12-ADP receptor was also similar between the 2 groups (p = 0.3). The H2 allele was found in 6 patients which are all included in the SDA group. After the first 600 mg loading dose of clopidogrel, patients carrying at least one H2 allele had similar VASP index compared to those carrying two copies of the wild type allele (H1) (SDA vs FDA: 44.9 ± 14.9 vs 43.5 ± 10%; p = 0.8).

Conclusion

The present study suggests that the H2 allele of the P2Y12-ADP receptor is not involved in clopidogrel failed dose adjustment according to platelet reactivity monitoring.     

Genetic determinants of high on-treatment platelet reactivity in clopidogrel treated Chinese patients

Introduction

Cytochrome P450 (CYP), ATP-binding cassette transporters (ABCB1), and paraoxonase-1 (PON1) play crucial roles in clopidogel absorption and bioactivation. Genetic polymorphisms in these genes have been associated with the variability of the response to clopidogrel, however their contribution to high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) in clopidogrel treated Chinese patients is less known.

Materials and methods

Five-hundred Chinese-Han patients treated with clopidogrel for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) were consecutively recruited from the Department of Geriatric Cardiology, General Hospital of Chinese People’s Liberation Army, from September 2010 to September 2012. We assessed the relations of CYP2C19*2 (rs4244285), CYP2C19*3 (rs4986893), CYP2C19*17 (rs12248560), PON1Q129R (rs662) and ABCB1C3435T (rs1045642) to the platelet aggregation after 5 days maintenance dose of clopidogrel administration, and the risk for HPR. The cutoff of HPR was defined as 20 μmol/L adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet aggregation > 50%.

Results

Both CYP2C19*2 and *3 alleles were significantly associated with higher platelet aggregation after 5 days maintenance dose of clopidogrel administration (P < 0.00001and P = 0.042, respectively). The platelet aggregation in carriers of at least one CYP2C19 loss-of-function allele (*2 or *3, accounted for 58% of the study population) was obviously higher than that in non-carriers (P < 0.00001). Patients with the CYP2C19*2 allele had a higher risk of HPR than those with the CYP2C19 wild-type genotype [adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 1.56; 95% confidence interval(CI), 1.04–2.33, P = 0.03]. The carriers of at least one CYP2C19 loss-of-function allele could also predict significantly greater risk of HPR compared with non-carriers (adjusted HR1.79,95% CI: 1.33–2.4,P = 0.003). However, the carriage of CYP2C19*3 alone could not predict the risk of HPR significantly (adjusted HR, 1.5; 95% CI: 0.83–3, P = 0.16). Significant relation of CYP2C19*17, PON1Q129R and ABCB1C3435T to the platelet aggregation was not found.

Conclusion

In clopidogrel treated Chinese patients with ACS, carriers of at least one CYP2C19 loss-of-function allele could predict greater risk of HPR, with the impact mainly attributing to CYP2C19*2. Neither ABCB1 nor PON1 genotype could influence the antiplatelet response of clopidogrel in the cohort of Chinese patients.     

Impact of point-of-care testing for CYP2C19 on platelet inhibition in patients with acute coronary syndrome and early dual antiplatelet therapy in the emergency setting

Aims

Only limited data exist about the role of point of care CYP2C19 testing in the acute setting in the early phase of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Therefore, the present study was designed to investigate the impact of CYP2C19 loss-of–function point-of-care (POC) genotyping in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and treated with dual antiplatelet therapy in the emergency setting.

Methods and Results

137 subjects with ACS scheduled for percutaneous coronary intervention were consecutively enrolled. Pre- and on-treatment platelet aggregation was assessed by multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) after stimulation with adenosine diphosphate (ADP). Patients were loaded according to current guideline adherent indications and contraindications for use of P2Y₁₂ inhibitors in ACS. POC genotyping for CYP2C19*2 was performed in the emergency room after obtaining a buccal swab using the Spartan RX CYP2C19 system and obtaining patient’s informed consent. Prasugrel and ticagrelor treated patients had significantly lower PR compared to clopidogrel-treated patients. The benefits of prasugrel and ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel treated patients in terms of platelet inhibition were more pronounced in CYP2C19*2 carriers. Non-carriers showed similar inhibition regardless of particular P2Y₁₂ inhibitor treatment. Statistical analyses adjusting for factors associated with response (e.g. smoking) revealed that CYP2C19*2 allele carrier status and loading with different type of P2Y12 receptor blockers were significant predictors of on-treatment platelet reactivity in the early phase of ACS.

Conclusion

The results of this pilot study of treatment of patients in the early phase of ACS indicate that CYP2C19*2 POC genotyping might help to identify patients at risk with poor response to clopidogrel treatment, thereby benefiting from reloading and switching to alternative P2Y₁₂ receptor inhibition.     

A comparison of three platelet function tests in ischemic stroke patients with antiplatelet therapy

Predicting the effectiveness of antiplatelet drugs is critical to precision antiplatelet therapy. However, there is a lack of an acceptable method, although there are a variety of methods for detecting platelet function. In this study, we compared three major platelet function tests to assess their performance and found better methods for platelet function evaluation after aspirin or clopidogrel treatment in ischemic stroke patients by comparative study. A total of 249 ischemic stroke patients were enrolled who were treated with aspirin or clopidogrel or both. Three platelet function tests including light transmittance aggregometry (LTA), thromboelastography (TEG), platelet function analyzer (PFA) were performed as well as CYP2C19 genotype determination. Correlation analyses and kappa statistics were used. All three methods were effective in evaluating aspirin function. However, only LTA and TEG had good correlation and consistency (r = -0.37, kappa = 0.634). TEG-ADP was the least sensitive for clopidogrel, as the platelet inhibition ratio did not differ between the clopidogrel-user group and the control (P = 0.074), while LTA and PFA were sensitive (P ＜ 0.001). Correlations between platelet assays were poor for clopidogrel (the absolute value of r range from 0.13 to 0.35) and so was the agreement (Kappa from 0.232 to 0.314). LTA and PFA have a good correlation with CYP2C19 genotyping (P = 0.034 and 0.014). In conclusion, all three tests were able to evaluate aspirin effect, LTA-AA and TEG-AA had a good correlation. TEG perform badly for clopidogrel effect detection. The fair-to-modest agreement among assays indicated further study was indispensable.     

Paraoxonase-1 activity affects the clopidogrel response in CYP2C19 loss-of-function carriers

Background

The impact of paraoxonase-1 (PON1) activity on the response to clopidogrel may differ in patients treated with drug-eluting stents (DES) in association with CYP2C19 loss-of-function (LOF) polymorphisms.

Methods

This study included 112 Japanese patients receiving clopidogrel (75 mg/day) and aspirin (100 mg/day) who underwent optical coherence tomography (OCT) examination 9 months after DES implantation. The CYP2C19 genotype was analyzed and LOF carriers (*1/*2, *1/*3, *2/*2, *3/*3, *2/*3) were identified. At the 9-month follow-up, platelet reactivity was determined by measuring the P2Y12 reactivity unit (PRU) using a VerifyNow P2Y12 assay, PON1 activity was evaluated and intra-stent thrombus was evaluated by OCT.

Results

Of the 112 Japanese patients, 75 were LOF carriers (67.0%). The patients were divided into tertiles according to the PON1 activity (tertile 1; < 230 U/L, tertile 2; 230–283 U/L, tertile 3; > 283 U/L). In the VerifyNowP2Y12 analysis, tertile 1 had a higher PRU than tertiles 2 and 3 in LOF carriers, and there was no difference among tertiles in non-carriers. The highest incidence of intra-stent thrombus was observed in tertile 1 followed by tertiles 2 and 3 in LOF carriers, whereas there was no such difference in non-carriers. Multivariate analysis revealed that LOF carriers and PON1 activity tertile 1 were independent predictors of intra-stent thrombus in all patients. In LOF carriers, tertile 1 was the only independent predictor for intra-stent thrombus.

Conclusion

Low PON1 activity is associated with a low response to clopidogrel and a high frequency of intra-stent thrombus only in LOF carriers.     

A comparison of the antiplatelet effects of prasugrel and high-dose clopidogrel as assessed by VASP-phosphorylation and light transmission aggregometry

Platelet inhibition as measured by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) and light transmission aggregometry (LTA) have shown concordance following dosing of clopidogrel. No reports have directly compared the VASP assay and LTA at the levels of P2Y(12) blockade after loading doses (LDs) of prasugrel or high dose clopidogrel (600 and 900 mg). The aim was to compare the VASP assay and LTA during the loading dose phase of a comparative study of prasugrel and clopidogrel. Prasugrel 60 mg LD/10 mg maintenance dose (MD) and clopidogrel 300 mg/75 mg and 600 mg/75 mg LD/MD regimens were compared in a 3-way crossover study in 41 healthy, aspirin-free subjects. Each LD was followed by seven daily MDs and a 14-day washout period. P2Y(12) receptor blockade was estimated using the VASP assay, expressed as platelet reactivity index (VASP-PRI). Platelet aggregation was assessed by light transmission aggregometry (20 and 5 microM ADP). Twenty-four hours after prasgurel 60 mg or clopidogrel 300 mg and 600 mg, respectively, VASP-PRI decreased from approximately 80% to 8.9%, 54.7%, and 39.0%, and maximal platelet aggregation (MPA) decreased from approximately 79% to 10.8%, 42.7%, and 31.2%, with an overall VASP:MPA correlation of 0.88 (p < 0.01). VASP assay responses after the clopidogrel LDs showed a wider range of values (300 mg: 0-93%; 600 mg: 0-80%) than prasugrel (0-13%); MPA responses followed a similar trend. Pearson's correlation suggested a strong agreement between VASP and LTA (20 microM ADP) for MPA (r = 0.86, p < 0.0001). VASP and LTA demonstrated concordance across the response range of P2Y(12) receptor blockade following thienopyridine LDs.     

Platelet reactivity evaluated with the VASP assay following ticagrelor loading dose in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Background

The level of platelet reactivity (PR) inhibition obtained after P2Y12-ADP receptor antagonist loading dose (LD) is associated with the ischemic and bleeding risk following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in acute coronary syndromes (ACS).

Objective

We aimed to evaluate the level of PR inhibition achieved by a 180 mg LD of ticagrelor and the rate of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) in ACS patients undergoing PCI.

Methods

We performed a multicentre prospective observational study enrolling ACS patients undergoing PCI. Patients were included if they were admitted for ST-elevation myocardial infarction or non ST-elevation ACS. To assess PR, a VASP index was measured at least 6 and within 24 hours following a 180 mg LD of ticagrelor. HTPR was defined as a VASP index ≥ 50%.

Results

One hundred and fifteen patients were included: 31.3% of STEMI, 49.6% of NSTEMI and 19.1% of unstable angina. Following ticagrelor LD the mean VASP index was 17 ± 14%. However the response to ticagrelor was not uniform with a small inter-individual variability: inter quartile range: 7.6–22.8% and a rate of HTPR of 3.5%. A high number of patients, 65.6%, had a VASP index < 16%. None of the baseline characteristics of the study population was associated with PR. In addition, PR was similar in STEMI, NSTEMI and unstable angina (p = 0.9).

Conclusion

In ACS patients the level of PR inhibition achieved by a 180 mg loading dose of ticagrelor is not uniform and the rate of HTPR is 3.5%. A high proportion of patients exhibited a VASP index < 16%.     

A randomised study comparing the antiplatelet and antinflammatory effect of clopidogrel 150 mg/day versus 75 mg/day in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction and poor responsiveness to clopidogrel: Results from the DOUBLE study

Introduction

The antiplatelet effect of standard or increased clopidogrel doses in patients with ST- segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) has never been studied. In this study we compared the antiplatelet effect of a 75 mg daily maintenance dose of clopidogrel with 150 mg in patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Materials and methods

Fifty-four patients with STEMI undergoing PCI were randomly allocated to receive either 75 mg/day clopidogrel (group 1) or 150 mg/day (group 2) for 1 month. Platelet function, measured by 5 different assays, was determined at 3 time points: 38 ± 8 hours after the procedure, 1 week and 1 month after randomization.

Results

In group 1, mean ± SD platelet reactivity index (PRI) measured with the VASP assay was 57.7 ± 15.7% and 46.9 ± 15.7% at 1 week and 1 month, respectively, compared to 38.8 ± 15.7% and 34.9 ± 12.6% in group 2 (p = 0.0001). Same results were observed for light transmittance aggregometry, whole blood aggregometry and VerifyNow, but not for thromboelastometry. In contrast to what may be expected, the 75 mg daily maintenance dose took longer than 1-week to provide the full clopidogrel antiplatelet effect. Furthermore, patients in group 2 had a nearly 50% reduction in C-reactive protein levels both at 1 week and 1 month.

Conclusion

In patients with STEMI and poor responsiveness to clopidogrel a 150 mg daily maintenance dose of clopidogrel is associated with a significant reduction of platelet aggregation and a trend towards reduced inflammation.     

Utility of whole blood impedance aggregometry for the assessment of clopidogrel action using the novel Multiplate analyzer--comparison with two flow cytometric methods

Background

Non-responsiveness to anti-platelet therapy has been reported and has been linked to the occurrence of adverse events. No standard method to monitor clopidogrel efficacy is available at present. We aimed at comparing the utility of whole blood impedance aggregometry for the assessment of clopidogrel action using the novel Multiplate® analyzer with two flow cytometric methods.

Methods

Platelet function was determined before and after the initiation of clopidogrel therapy (300 mg loading dose, followed by 75 mg qd) in 40 patients (observational study). Furthermore, 77 patients and 77 referents with and without clopidogrel treatment (75 mg qd) were evaluated (case control study). Platelet function was assessed by Multiplate® ADP and ADP + PG tests, by P-selectin (CD62P) expression, and by vasodilator stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation status.

Results

The observational study revealed that platelet reactivity decreased significantly after clopidogrel administration with all 4 methods (p < 0.001 for each). In the case control study the median values of all 4 tests were significantly higher in the referents without clopidogrel treatment than in the patients on clopidogrel therapy (p < 0.001 for each). Applying test specific lower reference limits as criterion for the differentiation between responders and non-responders to clopidogrel treatment, 57% of the patients on clopidogrel therapy were classified as non-responders with the Multiplate® ADP test, 38% with the Multiplate® ADP + PG test, 55% with the P-selectin assay, 9% with the PLT VASP/P2Y12 assay.

Conclusions

The VASP phosphorylation assay appeared to be advantageous for the assessment of clopidogrel action compared to the Multiplate® ADP + PG test, the P-selectin assay, and the Multiplate® ADP test (listed in descending order). However, our method comparison study underscores the critical nature of the dependence of results on the techniques used in specific studies, and it remains to be elucidated which method correlates best with the occurrence of adverse events.     

Baseline platelet size is increased in patients with acute coronary syndromes developing early stent thrombosis and predicts future residual platelet reactivity. A case-control study

Introduction

Pre-procedural predictors of early stent thrombosis (ST) and future response to platelet inhibitors are in demand. We sought to evaluate the impact of baseline platelet indices on the occurrence of early ST and future residual platelet reactivity.

Materials and methods

Hundred and eight patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in whom stents were implanted were included: 36 consecutive ST cases and 72 matched controls. Platelet indices assessed with flow cytometry before stent implantation were retrieved from the department's data base. Residual platelet reactivity specific to aspirin (aspirin reaction units-ARU) and clopidogrel (P2Y12 reaction units-PRU) was assessed prospectively with VerifyNow^® under dual antiplatelet treatment.

Results

Platelet size reported as mean platelet volume (MPV) or proportion of large platelets (LPLT) was significantly higher in ST cases compared with controls (10.4, 95% confidence intervals [CI], 10.1-10.8 vs. 9.7, CI, 9.5-9.9, P = 0.0004 and 35.8, CI, 34.2-37.3 vs. 33.3, CI, 32.2-34.3, P = 0.007, respectively). Dual aspirin and clopidogrel poor-responsiveness was diagnosed significantly more often in ST cases than in controls (19.6% vs. 1.4%, P = 0.004), whereas no difference was observed for single aspirin or clopidogrel poor-responsiveness. A strong correlation was found between MPV and both, ARU (r = 0.66, P < 0.0001) and PRU (r = 0.55, P < 0.0001). Similarly, higher LPLT was associated with higher ARU (r = 0.47, P < 0.0001) and PRU (r = 0.38, P = 0.0001).

Conclusions

Baseline platelet size is increased in patients with ACS developing early ST and correlates with future residual platelet reactivity under aspirin and clopidogrel therapy. Dual but not isolated aspirin or clopidogrel poor-responsiveness appears to be associated with early ST.     

P2Y12 platelet reactivity after thrombolytic therapy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Introduction

Thrombolysis, as reperfusion therapy for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), induces a pro-thrombotic status with enhanced platelet activity; this study aims to evaluate P2Y12 platelet reactivity and response to clopidogrel in the post-thrombolysis scenario.

Materials and Methods

Observational, prospective study, including consecutive patients with elective angiography after thrombolytic therapy for STEMI. Every patient received antiplatelet therapy with loading doses of 250 mg aspirin and 300 mg clopidogrel on admission followed by 100 mg aspirin and 75 mg clopidogrel daily. P2Y12-dependent platelet reactivity (expressed in P2Y12-Reaction Units, PRU) was assessed with VerifyNow® device on admission, daily after thrombolysis and pre-angiography.

Results

41 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Median time between thrombolysis and angiography was 2,5 days (IQR 1,8-4,1). Post-treatment platelet reactivity (PPR) showed poor correlation with time on clopidogrel treatment (r2 = 0.04) and reached a maximum value of 274 ± 84 PRU during the first 24 h after thrombolysis (Day + 1 determination). After this, values showed a progressive reduction until the point of angiography (249 ± 82 PRU), without significant differences between consecutive time-points (p = 0,549).Inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) assessed as a percentage of P2Y12 receptor blockage was poor, increasing gradually from 0 ± 4% on admission to 11 ± 6% the day of the angiography (p = 0,001). 71,4% of patients showed PPR ≥ 208 PRU during angiography.

Conclusions

Platelet reactivity, as assessed by post-treatment P2Y12 mediated reactivity, is heightened after thrombolytic therapy during STEMI management. In this scenario, standard doses of clopidogrel did not achieve significant inhibition of ADP-mediated platelet reactivity.     

Platelet function profiles in the elderly: results of a pharmacodynamic study in patients on clopidogrel therapy and effects of switching to prasugrel 5 mg in patients with high platelet reactivity

Studies specifically designed to assess clopidogrel response in the elderly as well as treatment alternatives to improve platelet inhibition in this high-risk population are lacking. This study aimed to define pharmacodynamic (PD) profiles, including high platelet reactivity (HPR) rates, among elderly patients on maintenance clopidogrel therapy and to assess the PD effects of prasugrel 5 mg/day in elderly with HPR. This was a prospective observational PD study enrolling consecutive ≥ 75-year-old patients on maintenance clopidogrel therapy (75 mg/day) who were tested for clopidogrel response by the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay and light transmittance aggregometry (LTA). HPR rates were estimated using multiple definitions. HPR patients identified by the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay [P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) ≥ 230] were switched to prasugrel 5 mg/day, and platelet function testing was performed after 15 days of treatment. PD testing was completed in 100 patients. The HPR prevalence varied between 25% and 32%, depending on the definition used. A PRU ≥ 230 was observed in 25 patients; of these, 20 switched to prasugrel 5 mg/day. This resulted in significant reduction in PRU mean values (279.8 ± 45.1 vs. 171.7 ± 65.2, p=0.0002) with an absolute between-treatment difference of 108.1 (95% confidence intervals 75.2-140.9). Accordingly, switching to prasugrel 5 mg/day overcame HPR in most (80%) patients. Consistently, all LTA measures were significantly lower after prasugrel compared with clopidogrel. In conclusion, a considerable proportion of elderly patients exhibit HPR while on standard clopidogrel therapy. Switching to 5 mg/day prasugrel in elderly patients with HPR is associated with enhanced platelet inhibition and overcomes HPR in the majority of these patients.